Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5203_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
51 Мб
Скачать
280
W. Jing et al.
28.1% at 12months and 20.0% at 24months. At the same periods, the degrees of seizure reduction were 68.6%, 57.8%, 46.9%, and 20.0%, respectively. Seizure reduc­tion was higher with clobazam comedication. In Dravet and Lennox- Gastaut patients,
70.0% had 50% seizure reduction at 3months compared with 22.0% in patients with other epilepsies, in whom the degrees of seizure reduction at 3months were 80.0% and 65.9%, respectively. The ndings suggest that cannabidiol is a treatment option in children and young adults with severe refractory epilepsy outside of Dravet and Lennox–Gastaut syndromes. Clobazam comedication increases seizure reduction.
Roberto Caraballo etal. [825] presented eight patients with West syndrome who were refractory to ASMs, and who were treated with cannabidiol-enriched cannabis oil as add-on therapy. After a follow-up of between 6 and 13months, a 75–99% decrease in seizure frequency was observed in two patients, a 50–74% decrease was observed in two, a less than 50% decrease was observed in three, and no changes in seizure fre­quency were seen in the remaining patient. The index of EEG abnormalities improved between 20% and 80% in seven patients concurrently with the reduction in seizures.
A prospective cohort study [826] found that in children with drug-resistant epi­leptic encephalopathies (DEEs), treatment with CBD-enriched medical cannabis as an adjuvant therapy induced reductions in seizure frequency. At the end of a median follow-up of 20months, 78% of the children had a 50% decrease in seizure fre­quency and 47.5% had a >75% decrease. Seven patients (11.9%) were seizure-free. Adverse effects were mostly mild or moderate. CBD was discontinued in 17 patients (28.8%) due to lack of response to treatment, increased seizure frequency, intoler­ance to the drug, or poor compliance. It was indicated that in children with drug­resistant DEEs, long-term treatment with CBD-enriched medical cannabis was found to be safe, well tolerated, and effective as an adjuvant therapy to antiseizure therapy.
Real World Research onCannabidiol
Katri Silvennoinen [827] described real-world experience with cannabidiol (CBD) in adults with Dravet Syndrome (DS). Adults with genetically conrmed DS had CBD added to existing therapy, titrated up to 20mg/kg, as tolerated. The primary outcome measure was percentage reduction in convulsive seizures. Secondary out­come measures included changes in myoclonic seizures, and in cognition and qual­ity of life as assessed by the Caregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC), and incidence of adverse events (AEs). Eighteen adults (median age 27.5years) were included. Median follow-up was 176days. 17.6% of patients had a >30% reduction in number of convulsive seizures. AEs occurred in all patients, the most common being transaminitis (52.9%). Behavioral AEs led to discontinuation in 3/18 patients, including a seizure-free responder. In 7/18 patients, CBD was stopped due to lack of effect. 8/18 continued on treatment. Improvements in Caregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC) were reported in 41.2% and 47.1% of patients by physicians and families, respectively. 17.6% achieved sufcient reduction in convulsive seizure frequency.
2 Antiseizure Medications
281
Safety ofCannabidiol
The main adverse reactions of cannabidiol included drowsiness, decreased appetite and diarrhea, followed by elevated serum transaminase levels. To determine the effect of cannabidiol on liver biochemical markers, Paul B Watkins et al. [828] evaluated changes in liver-related markers in healthy adults who received therapeu­tic daily doses of CBD for approximately 3.5 weeks. Seven participants (44%) experienced peak serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values greater than the upper limit of normal (ULN). For ve participants (31%), the value exceeded 5 × ULN, thereby meeting the international consensus criteria for drug-induced liver injury. There was no correlation between transaminase level elevations and baseline characteristics, CYP2C19 genotype, or CBD plasma concentrations. All ALT level elevations above the ULN began within 2–4weeks of initial exposure to CBD.The authors concluded that healthy adults consuming CBD may experience elevations in serum ALT levels consistent with drug-induced liver injury. Clinicians should be alert to this potential effect of CBD.
However, a safety study of repeated use of different doses (1, 2, 4, or 12mg/kg) of plant-derived CBD in healthy adult beagles found that the dogs tolerated repeated administration well, with no clinically meaningful changes in measured safety out­comes. Adverse events were mild in severity. Relative to placebo administration, CBD administration at 12 mg/kg/day resulted in more gastrointestinal adverse events (mainly hypersalivation) and signicantly higher serum alkaline phosphatase activity. Total systemic exposure to CBD increased on a dose-dependent basis fol­lowing both acute (rst dose) and chronic (28days) administration [829].
Giselda Cabral-Pereira et al. [830] examined the behavioral and molecular effects of acute and chronic intraperitoneal administrations of VPA (300mg/kg) and CBD (100mg/kg) on the GASH/Sal audiogenic seizures (a reliable experimental model of generalized tonic–clonic seizures in response to intense sound stimula­tion). They found that acute and chronic CBD treatments have no signicant adverse effects on body weight, hematological parameters, and liver function, although locomotor activity was reduced.
In addition to the above common adverse reactions, Ifrah Zawar et al. [831] described two cases of exacerbation of eyelid myoclonia in Jeavons Syndrome (JS) patients, which correlated with CBD use and resolved after CBD discontinuation. These cases highlight that caution should be practiced when using CBD for JS as it can potentially worsen eyelid myoclonia.
Preclinical Research onCannabidiol
Effects onSeizures inEpileptic Animals
Frías-Soria CL etal. [832] evaluated the effects of cannabidiol use alone or in com­bination with antiseizure drugs on the expression of recurrent generalized seizures in a rat model. The results revealed that cannabidiol did not modify the expression
282
W. Jing et al.
of the 3-mercaptopropionic acid (MP)-induced seizures but reduced the prevalence of status epilepticus (SE) in both experimental groups. Phenytoin decreased the expression of major seizures but did not modify the prevalence of SE.Cannabidiol combined with phenytoin did not modify these effects. Phenobarbital diminished the expression of major seizures, an effect more evident when combined with can­nabidiol. In contrast, CBD use in association with appropriate antiseizure drugs reduces the severity and prevalence of generalized seizures.
Merrick S Fallah etal. [833] assessed the efcacy of cannabidiol (CBD) and 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) for suppressing focal and secondarily generalized seizures in an amygdala-kindling rat. It was found that CBD alone produced a par­tial suppression of both generalized seizures and focal seizures. THC alone also produced partial suppression of generalized and focal seizures, but doses of 10mg/ kg and above produced hypolocomotion. The addition of a low dose of THC to CBD (15:1) has antiseizure properties in the amygdala-kindling model. The addi­tion of small amounts of THC greatly improves the effectiveness of CBD.A combi­nation of CBD and THC might be useful for the management of focal impaired awareness seizures (FIASs).
Antiepileptic Mechanisms ofCannabidiol
José Carlos Pastrana-Trejo etal. [834] evaluated the effects on the posttranslational modication (PTM) of histones H3K4Me3, H3K9ac, H3K9Me2, H3K27Me3, and H3K36Me2 levels in the cerebral cortex, hypothalamus and pons of CBD-treated rats. It was found that CBD increased the PTM levels on the histones H3K4Me3, H3K9ac, and H3K27Me3in the cerebral cortex. In addition, in the hypothalamus, CBD decreased the contents of H3K9ac. In the pons, CBD-treated rats showed a signicant decline on the PTM levels of H3K4Me3. The study showed that CBD induced differential effects in levels of PTMs on the histones H3K4Me3, H3K9ac, H3K9Me2, H3K27Me3, and H3K36Me2in several brain regions.
Willian Lazarini-Lopes etal. [835] studied the effects of chronic CBD adminis­tration in chronic models of seizures. Chronic CBD administration twice a day attenuated brainstem tonic–clonic seizures, prevented limbic recruitment, and sup­pressed limbic kindled seizures. Additionally, CBD prevented chronic neuronal hyperactivity, suppressing FosB immunostaining in the brainstem (inferior collicu­lus and periaqueductal gray matter) and forebrain (basolateral amygdala nucleus and piriform cortex), structures associated with tonic–clonic and limbic seizures, respectively. Chronic seizures increased cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1R) immu­nostaining in the hippocampus and in the BLA, while CBD administration pre­vented changes in CB1R expression induced by the AuK. The results strongly suggested chronic CBD anticonvulsant and antiepileptogenic effects associated with reduced chronic neuronal activity and modulation of CB1R expression.
Giselda Cabral-Pereira etal. [830] examined acute and chronic CBD administration in a hamster model of hereditary auditory convulsion, and found that chronic treatment with CBD caused abnormal mRNA expression levels for Trpv1, Adora1, Slc29a1, and Cnr1 genes. The study constituted a basis on which to develop further studies on the pharmacological effects of CBD and its interactions with other anticonvulsants.
2 Antiseizure Medications
283
Claudia Taborda Gómez etal. [836] performed experiments in the laboratory showing that CBD has an inhibitory role on P-glycoprotein excretory function, highly related to RE. CBD is considered a multitarget drug that could act throughout the canonical endocannabinoid receptors (CB1-CB2) or multiple noncanonical pathways. Since CB2 is expressed mainly in immune cells, they hypothesized that CBD treatment could alter the activity of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) in a similar way to microglia/macrophages and other circu­lating leukocytes. In vitro, CBD induced PMN cytoplasmatic vacuolization and proapoptotic nuclear condensation associated with a signicantly decreased viability in a concentration- dependent manner, while low CBD concentration decreased PMN viability in a time-dependent manner. At a functional level, CBD reduced the chemotaxis and oxygen consumption of PMNs related with superoxide anion production, while the singlet oxygen level was increased, sug­gesting oxidative stress damage. These results are in-line with the well-known CBD anti-inammatory effect and support a potential immunosuppressor role on PMNs that could promote an eventual defenseless state during chronic treat­ment with CBD in RE.
Zhang HB. etal. [837] used a uorescence-based thallium ux assay and found enhancement of ux through heterologously expressed human Kv7.2/7.3 channels by CBD.Patch-clamp recordings showed that CBD acts at submicromolar concentra­tions to shift the voltage dependence of Kv7.2/7.3 channels in the hyperpolarizing direction. The potent enhancement of Kv2/7.3 channels by CBD may contribute to its effectiveness as an antiseizure medication by reducing neuronal hyperexcitability.
2.2.2 Fenuramine
2.2.2.1 Characteristics oftheDrug
[Name of chemical] Fenuramine
[Chemical structure formula]
[Molecular formula] C12H16F3N
[Molecular weight] 231.257
[Indications for use] It is indicated for the treatment of seizures associated with
Dravet syndrome and Lennox–Gastaut syndrome in patients 2years of age and older.
[Specicatication] Oral solution: 2.2mg/mL fenuramine; 360mL/bottle.
284
W. Jing et al.
[Dosage]
The initial starting and maintenance dosage is 0.1mg/kg twice daily, which can be increased weekly based on efcacy and tolerability. The maximum daily maintenance dosage of fenuramine is 0.35mg/kg twice daily (maximum daily dosage of 26mg).
Dose adjustment is required in patients taking concomitant stiripentol plus clo­bazam: the maximum daily maintenance dosage of fenuramine is 0.2mg/kg twice daily (maximum daily dosage of 17mg).
Dosage adjustment is recommended in patients taking strong CYP1A2 or CYP2D6 inhibitors, with severe renal impairment, or with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment.
[Adverse reactions]
The most common adverse reactions (incidence at least 10% and greater than pla­cebo) in patients with Dravet Syndrome were decreased appetite, somnolence, seda­tion, lethargy, diarrhea, constipation, abnormal echocardiogram, fatigue, malaise, asthenia, ataxia, balance disorder, gait disturbance, blood pressure increase, drool­ing, salivary hypersecretion, pyrexia, upper respiratory tract infection, vomiting, decreased weight, fall, status epilepticus.
The most common adverse reactions (incidence at least 10% and greater than placebo) in patients with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome were diarrhea, decreased appe­tite, fatigue, somnolence, and vomiting.
2.2.2.2 Clinical Application andBasic Research
Fenuramine (3-trifurimethyl-n-ethylamphetamine) is a derivative of amphetamine that primarily affects serotonin neurotransmitter levels [838]. Fenuramine (FFA) was ini­tially used as an antidepressant and later as an appetite suppressant, but was withdrawn from the market in 1997 due to incidence of valvular heart disease and pulmonary hypertension in patients taking doses up to 220mg/kg/day of fenuramine [839842].
However, the oral solution of fenuramine was approved by the Food and Drug Administration of the United States and the European Union for the treatment of seizures associated with Dravet syndrome on June 25, 2020 and on December 21, 2020, respectively, completing the “new life of an old drug” [843]. On March 28, 2022, the FDA approved the drug for the treatment of seizures associated with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome (LGS). Since 2021, international research on fenura­mine in the treatment of epilepsy has made signicant progress.
Fenuramine forDravet Syndrome
Sullivan etal. [844] analyzed longitudinal data from two phase 3 studies to calculate the numbers needed to treat (NNT) with fenuramine to achieve “clinically mean­ingful” (50%) or “profound” (75%) monthly convulsive seizure frequency (MCSF) reductions in patients with Dravet syndrome (DS). In Study 1, NNTs to achieve
2 Antiseizure Medications
285
50% and 75% MCSF reduction were 1.8 and 2.1 at 0.7mg/kg/day fenuramine. In Study 2, these NNTs were 2.0 and 3.1, respectively. These results were seen as early as weeks 6–7 and were sustained through weeks 14–15.
They concluded that in both trials, one in every two to three DS patients treated with fenuramine achieved a reduction in the number of episodes of 50% or 75% compared to placebo. Respondent analysis and NNTs can provide important information for clinical decision-making, supplementing the average number of individuals achieving meaningful levels of improvement in MCSF.
To investigate the association between reduced seizure frequency and daily executive function (EF) dose in children and young adults on fenuramine adju­vant therapy, Bishop etal. [845] performed a postmortem analysis of data from patients 5–18years of age with DS who were enrolled in a randomized, placebo­controlled Phase 3 clinical trial. A minimum 1year fenuramine Open Label Extension (OLE) study was subsequently completed. They found that a reduction of 50% in the daily frequency of attacks in 78% of patients. Overall, there was a signicant correlation between change in MCSF and change in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) 2T scores for emotional regula­tion index (ERI) (p=0.008). The 50% MCSF reduction group was signicantly more likely to achieve clinically meaningful improvement in ERI (p=0.002) and in cognitive regulation index (CRI) (p=0.001) than the <50% MCSF reduction group. In summary, in children and young adults with DS, the magnitude of reduc­tion in MCSF after long-term treatment with adjunctive fenuramine was associ­ated with clinically meaningful levels of improvement in everyday EF.Seventy-eight percent of children and young adults treated with adjunctive fenuramine for 1year in the OLE study achieved a 50% reduction in MCSF, for a magnitude of efcacy associated with a signicantly greater likelihood of expe­riencing clinically meaningful improvement in emotion regulation and cognitive regulation.
Strzelczyk et al. [846] conducted a multicenter, retrospective, observational study to describe the efcacy, tolerability, and retention of fenuramine (FFA). Patients received add-on therapy with oral FFA gradually titrated to a target dose between 0.13 and 0.7 mg/kg/day. Overall, 78 patients with DS (median age=8.0years, range=2.1–46; 53% female) were treated with FFA for a median duration of 255.5days (range=31–572). Responder rates (50% reduction; n=78) and seizure freedom rates at 3months were 68% and 14% for total seizures, respec­tively, and 67% and 23% for generalized tonic–clonic seizures. Responder rates were consistent at 6 and 12months (n=66 and n=43, respectively). Median sei­zure days per month signicantly decreased from 10 (range = 0.5–30) to 3 (range=0–30) in the 3-month period before and after FFA treatment (p<0.001). Signicantly fewer patients reported at least one episode of status epilepticus (28% vs. 14% patients before and after FFA initiation, p=0.005). During FFA treatment, 35 patients (45%) were able to discontinue a concomitant ASM.At the last follow­ up date, 66 (85%) patients remained on treatment with FFA.The most common adverse events were somnolence (36%), decreased appetite (22%), and ataxia (8%). Forty-eight patients (62%) were reported to have a meaningful global clinical
286
W. Jing et al.
improvement. They concluded that fenuramine signicantly reduced the number of seizures and was well tolerated, providing valuable information for real-world practice.
Sullivan etal. [847] analyzed data from two phase 3 placebo-controlled trials of fenuramine adjuvant therapy for DS.They enrolled patients aged 2–19years who were randomized to receive placebo or the addition of fenuramine (Study 1:
0.7mg/kg/day or 0.2 mg/kg/day; In Study 2: 0.4 mg/kg/day and stepentol). The proportion of patients who never reached baseline seizure frequency was greater with fenuramine than with placebo (Study 1: fenuramine 0.7mg/kg/day, 60%; fenuramine 0.2mg/kg/day, 31%; placebo, 13%; Study 2: fenuramine 0.4mg/kg/ day, 58%; placebo, 2%). Median time-to-nth seizure was longer after fenuramine than after placebo (p<0.001). The longest duration of convulsive seizure-free days was increased in fenuramine groups versus the placebo group (p<0.05). The most common adverse events included decreased appetite, pyrexia, upper respiratory tract infection, diarrhea, and fatigue. The results demonstrate that fenuramine sig­nicantly reduces day-to-day seizure burden in patients with DS, providing pro­longed periods of convulsive seizure-free days, which may reduce the physical and emotional disease toll while improving health-related QOL for patients and caregivers.
Evidence-Based Medical Research onFenuramine intheTreatment ofEpilepsy
Zhang etal. [840] searched the Web of Science, MEDLINE (Ovid and PubMed), Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google. A meta-analysis of randomized placebo­controlled trials for the treatment of Dravet syndrome in the Scholar database obtained data from 206 patients receiving fenuramine, which showed that fenu­ramine was an effective antiseizure agent for the treatment of Dravet syndrome in children.
Fenuramine forCDKL5 Deciency Disorder Epilepsy
CDKL5 Deciency Disorder (CDD) is an X-linked drug-resistant neurogenetic disorder characterized by global developmental delays and hard-to-control sei­zures. Devinsky etal. [848] studied six CDD patients (ve women); the efcacy of fenuramine in the treatment of CDD was evaluated in 83% of patients whose seizures had failed with 5–12 ASMs or other treatments. The median age at enrollment was 6.5 years (range 2–26 years). They found that fenuramine reduced the median seizure frequency of ve patients with tonic–clonic seizures by 90% (range 86–100%). Two patients experienced a 50–60% reduction in the frequency of the episodes. One patient had reduced numbers of myoclonic sei­zures. They believe fenuramine may be a promising antiseizure drug for the treatment of CDD.
2 Antiseizure Medications
287
Basic Research ofFenuramine intheTreatment ofEpilepsy
Parthena etal. [849] examined the modulatory activity of fenuramine on the S1R­mediated antiamnesic response in mice using combination analyses. Fenuramine and norfenuramine, racemate and isomers, were combined with either the S1R agonist PRE-084 or the S1R-acting neuroactive steroids pregnenolone sulfate (PREGS), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), or progesterone.
They reported that fenuramine racemate or (+)-fenuramine, in the 0.1–1mg/ kg dose range, attenuated the dizocilpine-induced learning decits in spontaneous alternation and passive avoidance, and showed low-dose synergies in combination with PRE-084. These effects were blocked by the S1R antagonist NE-100. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate or PREGS attenuated dizocilpine-induced learning decits in the 5–20mg/kg dose range. Cotreatments at low doses between steroids and fenuramine or (+)-fenuramine were synergistic. Progesterone blocked fen­uramine’s effect. Finally, fenuramine and (+)-fenuramine effects were pre­vented by the addition of the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY-100635 or the 5-HT2A antagonist RS-127445, but not by the 5-HT1B/1D antagonist GR 127935 or the 5-HT2C antagonist SB 242084, conrming a 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptor involvement in the drug effect on memory.
They therefore conrmed the positive modulation of fenuramine racemate or dextroisomer on S1R and showed that, under physiological conditions, the drug potentiated the low-dose effects of neuroactive steroids and endogenous S1R modu­lators. The latter are potent modulators of the excitatory/inhibitory balance in the brain, and their levels must be considered in the antiepileptic action of fenuramine.

References

1. Tchicaloff M, Pennetti F. [Therapeutic results with a new antiepileptic, tegretol]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1963;93:1664–6.
2. Spillane JD.The treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: preliminary experience with “tegretol”. Practitioner. 1964;192:71–7.
3. Donner M, Frisk M.Carbamazepine treatment of epileptic and psychic symptoms in children and adolescents. Ann Paediatr Fenn. 1965;11(2):91–7.
4. Fernandez VE. [Pharmacology of carbamazepine]. Rev Neuropsiquiatr. 1967;30(3):273–89.
5. Redpath TH, Gayford JJ.The side effects of carbamazepine therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1968;26(3):299–303.
6. Mastroianni G, Ascoli M, Gasparini S, etal. Therapeutic approach to difcult-to-treat typical absences and related epilepsy syndromes. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2021;14(11):1427–33.
7. Santalucia R, Vilain C, Soblet J, etal. Carbamazepine efcacy in a severe electro-clinical presentation of SLC13A5-epilepsy. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2022;9(7):1095–9.
8. Vickery PB, Tillery EE, DeFalco AP. Intravenous carbamazepine for adults with seizures. Ann Pharmacother. 2018;52(3):285–9.
9. Kacirova I, Grundmann M, Brozmanova H.Therapeutic monitoring of carbamazepine and its active metabolite during the 1st postnatal month: inuence of drug interactions. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;137:111412.
288
10. Xu W, Chen YL, Zhao Y, etal. A clinical study of toxication caused by carbamazepine abuse in adolescents. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:3201203.
11. Kohlmann P, Stillhart C, Kuentz M, etal. Investigating oral absorption of carbamazepine in pediatric populations. AAPS J. 2017;19(6):1864–77.
12. Miyata-Nozaka Y, Tan HJ, Wong SW, etal. CYP3A5 genetic variants and their associations with carbamazepine and valproic acid response in Malaysian epileptic patients. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021;59(1):8–16.
13. Welzel T, Ziesenitz VC, Weber P, etal. Drug-drug and drug-food interactions in an infant with early-onset SCN2A epilepsy treated with carbamazepine, phenytoin and a ketogenic diet. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;87(3):1568–73.
14. Berghuis B, Hulst J, Sonsma A, etal. Symptomatology of carbamazepine- and oxcarbazepine­induced hyponatremia in people with epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2021;62(3):778–84.
15. Pan CW, Yu CH, Liao DL. Carbamazepine-induced hypersensitivity syndrome in chronic schizophrenia. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2013;35(5):575.e9–e10.
16. Hamed SA, Oseilly AM.Cochlear function in adults with epilepsy and treated with carbam­azepine. Audiol Neurootol. 2018;23(1):63–72.
17. Xu C, Pan L, Zhang Y, etal. Assessing carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine-associated Stevens­Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis: data mining the public version of the FDA adverse event reporting system. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75(8):e14273.
18. Wong CSM, Yap DYH, Ip P, etal. HLA-B*15:11 status and carbamazepine-induced severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions in HLA-B*15:02 negative Chinese. Int J Dermatol. 2022;61(2):184–90.
19. Ohta K, Okanishi T, Kanai S, etal. Stimulus-induced focal motor seizure in a pediatric patient with carbamazepine overdose. Brain Dev. 2022;44(10):765–8.
20. Baylis S, Costa-Pinto R, Hodgson S, etal. Combined hemoperfusion and continuous veno­venous hemoltration for carbamazepine intoxication. Blood Purif. 2022;51(9):721–5.
21. Ran D, Wang N, Bao F, etal. Carbamazepine-induced follicular mucinosis-like drug erup­tion. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2022;88(6):826–8.
22. Perrott S, Khan QI, Counsell CE, etal. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy asso­ciated with carbamazepine-induced immune dysfunction and recovery after carbamazepine cessation. BMJ Case Rep. 2023;16(7):e255119.
23. Chang BL, Liu JR, Chang SH, etal. Impact on carbamazepine usage and cutaneous adverse reactions before and after the reimbursement of HLA-B*1502 genotyping in Taiwan, 2000-2017: a nationwide longitudinal study. Epilepsia. 2023;64(10):2679–89.
24. Demir I, Adiguzel A.Assessment of vestibulo-ocular reex with video head impulse test in epilepsy patients undergoing carbamazepine monotherapy. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023;27(17):8013–8.
25. Kong FC, Ma CL, Lang LQ, etal. Association of xenobiotic receptor polymorphisms with carbamazepine response in epilepsy patients. Gene. 2021;771:145359.
26. Simeone TA, Heruye SH, Kostansek J, etal. Carbamazepine reduces sharp wave-ripple com­plexes and exerts synapse-specic inhibition of neurotransmission in exvivo hippocampal slices. Brain Sci. 2021;11(6):787.
27. Zhang ML, Chen XL, Bai ZF, etal. ABCB1 c.3435C > T and EPHX1 c.416A > G polymor­phisms inuence plasma carbamazepine concentration, metabolism, and pharmacoresistance in epileptic patients. Gene. 2021;805:145907.
28. Zhang Y, Chen Z, Shi Y, etal. Revealing the sorption mechanisms of carbamazepine on pris­tine and aged microplastics with extended DLVO theory. Sci Total Environ. 2023;874:162480.
29. Jaruthamsophon K, Thomson PJ, Hammond S, et al. Characterization of drug-specic CD4(+) T-cells reveals possible roles of HLA class II in the pathogenesis of carbamazepine hypersensitivity reactions. Chem Res Toxicol. 2023;36(5):757–68.
30. Karlov VA, Vlasov PN, Kozhokaru AB, et al. [The efcacy and tolerability of extended release carbamazepine in adult patients with new-onset epilepsy using epileptiform activity index]. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2021;121(3):31–8.
W. Jing et al.
2 Antiseizure Medications
31. Yip VLM, Pertinez H, Meng X, et al. Evaluation of clinical and genetic fac­tors in the population pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;87(6):2572–88.
32. Kacirova I, Grundmann M, Brozmanova H.Carbamazepine and carbamazepine-epoxide concentrations in mothers, colostrum, and breastfed newborns: comparison with concen­trations determined during delivery and in the mature milk period. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;151:113176.
33. Fujita Y, Murai M, Muraki S, etal. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of drug-drug inter­actions between perampanel and carbamazepine using enzyme induction model in epileptic patients. Ther Drug Monit. 2023;45(5):653–9.
34. Gul A, Mehreen S.Effect of carbamazepine on emotional intelligence and mindfulness in patients with partial epilepsy. J Pak Med Assoc. 2021;71(4):1103–6.
35. Lee JTC, Shanina I, Chu YN, etal. Carbamazepine, a beta-cell protecting drug, reduces type 1 diabetes incidence in NOD mice. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):4588.
36. Bai Z, Jia K, Chen G, etal. Carbamazepine induces hepatotoxicity in zebrash by inhibition of the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Environ Pollut. 2021;276:116688.
37. Di Stefano G, De Stefano G, Leone C, etal. Real-world effectiveness and tolerability of carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine in 354 patients with trigeminal neuralgia. Eur J Pain. 2021;25(5):1064–71.
38. Shewell LK, Day CJ, De Bisscop X, etal. Repurposing carbamazepine to treat gonococcal infection in women: oral delivery for control of epilepsy generates therapeutically effective levels in vaginal secretions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023;67(1):e0096822.
39. Hamanaka K, Miyoshi K, Sun JH, et al. Amelioration of a neurodevelopmental disor­der by carbamazepine in a case having a gain-of-function GRIA3 variant. Hum Genet. 2022;141(2):283–93.
40. Wang X, Ao X, Zhang T, etal. Ultraviolet-light-emitting-diode activated monochloramine for the degradation of carbamazepine: kinetics, mechanisms, by-product formation, and toxicity. Sci Total Environ. 2022;806(Pt 4):151372.
41. Candeloro M, Eikelboom JW, Chan N, etal. Carbamazepine, phenytoin, and oral anticoagu­lants: drug-drug interaction and clinical events in a retrospective cohort. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022;6(2):e12650.
42. Wentland L, Downs C, Fu E.Comparison of signal enhancement strategies for carbamaze­pine detection in undiluted human saliva using an electrochemical sensor with stencil-printed carbon electrodes. Anal Methods. 2022;14(32):3103–14.
43. Chan H, Li Q, Wang X, etal. Vitamin D(3) and carbamazepine protect against Clostridioides difcile infection in mice by restoring macrophage lysosome acidication. Autophagy. 2022;18(9):2050–67.
44. Bonaccorso A, Gigliobianco MR, Lombardo R, et al. Nanonized carbamazepine for nose-to-brain delivery: pharmaceutical formulation development. Pharm Dev Technol. 2023;28(2):248–63.
45. Suwabe S, Tagami T, Ogawa K, etal. Improved drug transfer into brain tissue via the “nose­to- brain” approach using suspension or powder formulations based on the amorphous solid dispersion technique. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2023;185:137–47.
46. Mogavero MP, Ferri R, Marelli S, etal. Polysomnographic features associated with clonaz­epam and melatonin treatment in isolated REM sleep behavior disorder: time for new thera­peutic approaches? CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024;30(2):e14569.
47. Cloos JM.The treatment of panic disorder. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2005;18(1):45–50.
48. Chouinard G.The search for new off-label indications for antidepressant, antianxiety, anti­psychotic and anticonvulsant drugs. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2006;31(3):168–76.
49. Aurora RN, Zak RS, Maganti RK, etal. Best practice guide for the treatment of REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD). J Clin Sleep Med. 2010;6(1):85–95.
50. Khouzam HR.Identication and management of tardive dyskinesia: a case series and litera­ture review. Postgrad Med. 2015;127(7):726–37.
289