Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5203_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
51 Мб
Скачать
180
W. Jing et al.
damage processes. Transgenic mice expressing elevated levels of α2δ-1 developed neuropathic pain even in the absence of nerve damage. Therefore, the analgesic effect of gabapentin is thought to be due to inhibition of the calcium current by its binding to the α2δ-1 subunit, which leads to a reduction in postsynaptic excitability. However, gabapentin has not been shown to consistently inhibit the Ca2+ cur­rent [477].
To date, other mechanisms of analgesia are thought to exist [478]: (1) Gabapentin inhibits the accumulation of α2δ-1 expression at the terminus of the presynaptic dorsal horn and reduces the response to pain stimuli; (2) α2δ-1 can enhance the release of neurotransmitters when calcium inow decreases, and gabapentin can affect pain perception by inhibiting α2δ-1-mediated neurotransmitter release; (3) analgesic effects are mediated by the facilitation of descending noradrenergic inhi­bition, the inhibition of descending serotonergic facilitation and cortical mecha­nisms affecting the limbic system; and (4) gabapentin inhibits the formation of new excitatory synapses by blocking the binding of astrocyte-derived thromboreactive proteins to α2δ-1. (5) The uptake of glutamate is stimulated by excitatory amino acid transporters. (6) The inammatory response is inhibited after injury. (7) Modulation of the affective component of pain.
Other Applications ofGabapentin
In addition to treating focal epilepsy and neuropathic pain, gabapentin can also be used to treat restless leg syndrome, hiccups, drug withdrawal, and other conditions. Persistent hiccups have a signicant impact on quality of life and can be a barrier to stroke recovery. Chlorpromazine, the rst-line treatment for intractable hiccups, has a sedative effect and may negatively affect participation in rehabilitation. Studies have reported that gabapentin is effective in the treatment of hiccups in both the general population and the poststroke population. The therapeutic dose ranges from 100mg each time, three times a day, to 400mg each time, twice a day, and the dura­tion of treatment ranges from 2days to 5.5weeks [479].
Gabapentin may assist in benzodiazepine withdrawal treatment. A retrospective study of 172 patients who developed benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms showed that patients who received gabapentin as a benzodiazepine-assisted treatment took less benzodiazepines and had a shorter hospital stay than did a control group who did not receive gabapentin as a benzodiazepine-assisted treatment. This suggests that gabapentin can be used as an adjunct therapy for patients withdrawing from treatment with benzodiazepines [480].
Gabapentin has protective effects on the myocardium and can reduce ischemia– reperfusion injury, which may be related to the activation of PI3K/Akt in the myo­cardium and the upregulation of GABAARδ in the spinal cord [481].
Gabapentin can improve sleep quality in patients with sensory nervous sys­tem diseases. A meta-analysis showed that compared with the placebo group, the gabapentin group had a signicantly lower degree of sleep disturbance, improved sleep quality, and a lower incidence of more than 5 awakenings at night [482].
2 Antiseizure Medications
2.1.2.5 Pregabalin
Drug Characteristics
[Chemical name] (S)-3-(aminomethyl)-5-methylhexanoic acid
[Chemical structure]
181
[Molecular formula] C8H17NO
2
[Molecular weight] 159.23
[Indications]
Treatment of adult patients with focal epileptic seizures (with or without secondary generalized seizures).
[Specication] 75mg, 150mg
[Dosage]
The therapeutic dose of pregabalin is 150–600mg/day. The starting dose is 150mg/ day, which is taken two to three times daily. According to the patient’s response and tolerance, the dose can be increased to 300mg/day after 1week, and then 1week later, the dose can be increased to the maximum dose of 600mg/day, which can be taken on an empty stomach or with food.
[Adverse reactions] The most common adverse reactions are dizziness and drows­iness. Other common adverse reactions include dry mouth, edema, blurred vision, weight gain and abnormal thinking.
Clinical Application andBasic Research
Historical Evolution ofPregabalin
Pregabalin (PGB) is a gabapentinoid that is structurally similar to the inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). It was approved in the United States and the European Union in 2004 as an added medicine for adults with focal epi­lepsy. Since then, it has been approved for the treatment of focal epilepsy in children older than 4years in the United States but has not been approved for pediatric use in the European Union. PGB primarily binds to presynaptic voltage-gated calcium channels on the α-2-δ subunit to reduce the release of excitatory neurotransmitters, thereby exerting antiseizure effects.
182
W. Jing et al.
Pregabalin Monotherapy forFocal Epilepsy
Zhao etal. [483] designed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the effec­tiveness and safety of different ASMs in the treatment of focal epilepsy, which included 11 pregabalin-related randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The results showed that the efcacy of PGB on focal seizures was relatively high. Compared with patients treated with topiramate and oxcarbazepine, patients treated with PGB had the lowest risk of headache and nausea, although the risk of dizziness, drowsi­ness and fatigue increased. However, the overall risk of adverse events was low.
French etal. [484] evaluated the efcacy of PGB in the treatment of focal epi­lepsy by designing with historical controls converted to monotherapy. A total of 161 patients whose disease was poorly controlled by their original antiseizure drugs were included in the study. Finally, 148 patients received 600mg/day or 150mg/day pregabalin (4:1) in randomized double-blind monotherapy for 20weeks (8-week conversion and 12-week monotherapy periods). The results showed that the rate of epilepsy-related withdrawal in the 600mg/day PGB group was 27.5%, which was signicantly lower than that in the historical control group (74% and 68%, respec­tively) (p= 0.001). This nding suggests that PGB is effective for treating focal epilepsy as monotherapy. In addition, eight patients taking 600mg/day PGB and two patients taking 150mg/day PGB achieved seizure-free status, and the overall safety was consistent with that of previous trials. The authors concluded that prega­balin monotherapy is safe and effective in patients with poorly controlled focal seizures.
To explore an effective and safe monotherapy regimen for newly diagnosed adult patients with focal epilepsy, Kwan etal. [485] conducted a double-blinded, random­ized, noninferiority study comparing pregabalin and lamotrigine. A total of 660 patients with new-onset epilepsy from 105 medical centers were randomly assigned to the treatment groups (330 to pregabalin, 330 to lamotrigine). The initial doses of 150mg/day PGB and 100mg/day LTG were administered orally twice a day. As needed, the maximum doses were increased to 600mg/day PGB and 500mg/day LTG within 4weeks and were maintained for 52weeks. Overall, 622 patients com­pleted the entire therapy (314 with PGB, 308 with LTG). Compared with those in the LTG group, fewer patients in the PGB group achieved 6months or more without seizures (52% vs. 68%). Dizziness (17% vs. 14%), drowsiness (9% vs. 4%), fatigue (8% vs. 6%), and weight gain (6% vs. 2%) were more common in the PGB group. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar between the two groups. The authors speculated that PGB was similarly tolerable to LTG but might not be as effective as LTG in treating newly diagnosed focal seizures in adults.
Bruin etal. [486] analyzed a total of 66 studies to determine the effectiveness and tolerability of ASMs in the treatment of glioma-related epilepsy. The results showed that phenytoin had the highest seizure-free rate after 6months of monotherapy. After 12months, pregabalin and levetiracetam monotherapy showed the greatest efcacy. In addition, levetiracetam was most effective at reducing seizures by ≥50% at 6 and 12months of treatment. However, phenytoin and pregabalin showed the highest treatment failure rates at 12months. Based on limited evidence, the authors
2 Antiseizure Medications
183
speculated that levetiracetam, phenytoin and pregabalin monotherapy would be effective in glioma patients with epilepsy, with levetiracetam showing the lowest treatment failure rate compared to the other ASMs studied.
Pregabalin intheTreatment ofGeneralized Tonic–Clonic Seizures
In a randomized, double-blinded, multicenter study [487] of 219 patients with gen­eralized tonic–clonic seizures, 75, 72, and 72 patients were randomized to receive 5mg/kg/day pregabalin, 10mg/kg/day pregabalin, or placebo, respectively. There were 15, 11, and 6 patients who discontinued 5mg/kg/day, 10mg/kg/day, and pla­cebo, respectively, due to adverse events (10.7%, 6.9%, and 5.6%, respectively). The results showed that there was no signicant change in the average 28-day sei­zure rate or response rate among the three groups. The most common AEs (≥10%) were dizziness, headache, and somnolence, most of which were mild or moderate. Therefore, pregabalin is not recommended for the treatment of generalized tonic– clonic seizures.
Pregabalin intheTreatment ofRefractory Epilepsy
Pregabalin is an effective add-on treatment for focal seizures. The guideline sum­mary recommends that pregabalin can effectively reduce the frequency of seizures in adults with refractory focal epilepsy (Grade A) [488]. To evaluate the efcacy and tolerability of pregabalin as an add-on treatment for drug-resistant focal epilepsy, two groups [489, 490] conducted a systematic review of nine randomized controlled trials. The results showed that pregabalin, as an add-on treatment for refractory focal epilepsy, was signicantly more effective than placebo in reducing seizures by 50% or more and attaining seizure freedom. Furthermore, there was a certain dose– response relationship. Doses ranging from 150 to 600mg/day were effective. As the dose increased from 300 to 600mg/day, the chance of a response doubled, but toler­ability issues occurred at higher doses. Compared with patients taking lamotrigine, patients taking pregabalin were more likely to have a 50% or greater reduction in seizure rates, but there was no signicant difference in seizure-free status between patients taking each of the two drugs. Compared with those taking levetiracetam, there was no signicant difference in the 50% or greater reduction in seizure rates among patients taking pregabalin, but there was a relatively lower seizure-free rate in patients who received an addition of pregabalin. However, the trials included in this review were short in duration. Longer-term trials are needed to inform clinical decisions.
To compare the efcacy of a new generation of antiseizure drugs in the treatment of refractory epilepsy, Viteva etal. [491] conducted an open, prospective study in which 1259 epilepsy patients participated and 47 patients received pregabalin. The average age of these patients was 34.43±1.65years. The average duration of epi­lepsy was 19.96 ± 1.54 years. In addition, the average treatment dose was
333.51±1.47mg/day. Comparative analysis of the dynamic reduction in seizure severity showed that treatment with PGB reduced seizure severity and frequency to
184
W. Jing et al.
a greater extent than treatment with oxcarbazepine or topiramate, but the retention rate was signicantly lower. In addition, at the sixth month of treatment, patients who received PGB had a greater incidence of adverse reactions (25.5%). The authors speculated that pregabalin had a good dynamic improvement effect on the severity and frequency of seizures. It was mainly effective for patients with focal epilepsy, but its tolerability was lower than that of other ASMs.
Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-HS) is usu­ally poorly controlled with antiseizure drugs. Androsova etal. [492] conducted a study on the efcacy, tolerability and retention rate of different ASMs in the treat­ment of MTLE-HS.For comparison, a total of 3249 trials were included, with a total of 767 patients. There were 73 patients who received PGB.The results showed that most (92.1%) of the PGB was added as a third drug, with an average maximum dose of 300mg/day and an average treatment time of 10±9.8months. Compared with CBZ and levetiracetam, only 4.7% of patients were seizure free after 12months of PGB treatment. The therapy failure rate was 41.9%. The incidence of adverse reactions was high (27.4%), and the most common adverse reactions were drowsi­ness and weight gain. In addition, the retention rate of PGB was the lowest (40%). The authors held that PGB had no obvious advantage in treating seizures in patients with MTLE-HS.
Pregabalin intheTreatment ofRefractory Status Epilepticus
There is currently insufcient evidence to support the effectiveness of PGB in the treatment of refractory and superrefractory status epilepticus [493]. It is recom­mended to combine pregabalin with high-level anesthetics such as propofol, mid­azolam, thiopental, and ketamine [494].
Novy etal. [495] reported that a clear electroclinical response was observed in 5 of 11 RSE patients treated with PGB. This effect was obvious 24 h after PGB administration. Possible reactions were noted on three occasions when PGB was combined with other antiseizure drugs. The remaining three patients had no obvious response after PGB administration. The response of PGB in the treatment of focal SE appeared to be better than that of generalized convulsive SE.
Swisher etal. [496] administered a combination of intravenous phenytoin (PHT), levetiracetam (median dose of LEV, 3000 mg/day), and oral pregabalin (median dose of PGB, 375mg/day) for RSE in 23 patients with primary or metastatic brain tumors. The results showed that SE in 16 patients (70%) stopped on average 24h after the addition of the third antiseizure drug. No related adverse reactions occurred. These ndings suggest that the combination of PHT, LEV, and PGB may be safe and efcient for the treatment of RSE in patients with brain tumors.
Another retrospective study [497] included 21 patients with frequent nonconvul­sive seizures (NCSs) and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). The patients were treated with PGB at an average therapeutic dose of 342mg/day. Ultimately, 11 patients (52%) achieved an electroclinical response. This result suggests that PGB was more effective for halting NCS (nine patients, 82%) than for preventing NCSE (two patients, 18%). Additionally, seizures were halted in 67% of brain tumor
2 Antiseizure Medications
185
patients. However, none of the patients (four patients) with anoxic injury responded to PGB.In addition, PGB was well-tolerated by most patients after treatment, with only two patients experiencing dizziness and sedation. These ndings suggest that pregabalin may be a safe option as an add-on treatment for critically ill patients with nonconvulsive seizures and nonconvulsive status epilepticus when conventional therapy fails.
Pregabalin inSpecial Populations withEpilepsy
Mann etal. [498] used video electroencephalography (VEEG) monitoring to evalu­ate the efcacy and safety of pregabalin as an add-on treatment for focal epilepsy in children (1month to 4years old). They randomized 175 pediatric patients (mean age 28.2months, 59% male) at a 2:1:2 ratio to receive 7mg/kg/day pregabalin, 14mg/kg/day pregabalin or placebo. The results showed that compared with that in the placebo group (n=53, P=0.022), the 24-h seizure rate was 35% lower in the PGB 14mg/kg/day (n=28) group. However, the seizure rate in the PGB 7mg/kg/ day (n=59) group did not signicantly improve. In addition, the most common AEs in the PGB 7mg/kg/day, 14mg/kg/day, and placebo treatment groups were somno­lence (11.3%, 17.6%, and 5.7%, respectively) and upper respiratory tract infection (7.0%, 11.8%, and 11.4%, respectively). The severity of all AEs was mild to moder­ate. The authors considered that 14mg/kg/day pregabalin could signicantly reduce the rate of focal seizures in children. Pregabalin at 7mg/kg/day and 14mg/kg/day was generally safe and well tolerated in children aged 1month to 4years.
To better understand the efcacy and tolerability of pregabalin as an add-on treatment for focal seizures in children (4–16 years old), Antinew et al. [499] designed a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study. A total of 295 children (mean age 10.2years, 55% male) were randomized to receive PGB 2.5mg/ kg/day (n=104), PGB 10mg/kg/day (n=97), or placebo (n=94). The treatment was double-blinded and lasted for 12weeks (dose escalation for 2weeks, xed dose for 10weeks). The data showed that the 28-day seizure rate of children in the 10mg/ kg/day PGB group was signicantly lower than that in the placebo group (19.9%, P=0.0185). The 2.5mg/kg/day PGB group showed no signicant improvement in seizure frequency (P=0.2577). In addition, the response rate of the PGB 10mg/kg/ day group (40.6%, P=0.0068) was signicantly better than that of the PGB 2.5mg/ kg/day group (29.1%, P = 0.26) and placebo group (22.6%). Common adverse events (10%) in the 10mg/kg/day PGB, 2.5mg/kg/day PGB, and placebo groups included somnolence (25.8%, 17.3%, 13.8%), weight gain (13.4%, 3.8%, 4.3%) and increased appetite (10.3%, 6.7%, 4.3%). The authors concluded that 10mg/kg/ day PGB effectively reduced the frequency of focal seizures in children and was well tolerated.
Chan etal. [500] used population pharmacokinetics (PK) and exposure-response (ER) relationships to summarize data related to pregabalin concentration and ef­cacy. They analyzed and compared the relationship between pregabalin exposure and ER in children and adults with focal epilepsy. Population PK simulations showed that for children aged 4–16years and weighing 30kg, 2.5–10mg/kg/day
186
W. Jing et al.
PGB was required to achieve steady-state exposure concentrations similar to those of adult patients receiving approved doses of 150–600mg/day. For children aged 4–16 years weighing <30 kg, 3.5–14 mg/kg/day PGB was required to achieve equivalent exposure. The ndings support the guidance of PGB dosing provided in the guidelines. Pediatric patients (4–16years old) weighing <30kg should receive a 40% higher dose of PGB per kilogram of body weight than patients weighing 30kg to achieve similar exposure.
Regarding the study of pregabalin in the treatment of women, a population-based cohort study was conducted through population registries (2005–2016) in four Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden). This research exam­ined the association between prenatal exposure to pregabalin and the risk of adverse delivery and postpartum neurodevelopmental outcomes. The results showed that prenatal exposure to pregabalin was not associated with low birth weight, prematu­rity, small gestational age, low Apgar score, microcephaly, autism spectrum disor­der or intellectual disability. The increased risk of any major congenital malformations and ADHD was unlikely to be greater than 1.8 [501].
Effect ofPregabalin onElectroencephalography
Parekh etal. [502] described a rare case of PGB-induced triphasic waves (TWs). The patient was a 74-year-old man with diabetes-related peripheral neuropathy. He had a history of chronic kidney disease and long-term use of PGB (75mg, twice daily). For pain relief within 8h, the patient received 450mg of PGB and subse­quently developed altered mental status, somnolence and disorientation. Bedside EEG showed continuous TWs with slow background activity, ruling out nonconvul­sive status epilepticus. Forty-eight hours after the discontinuation of PGB, the patient was conscious and alert. Seventy-two hours later, the repeat EEG did not show any TWs. On the fth day after admission, the patient’s mental status fully recovered. The authors determined that this case was acute reversible toxic enceph­alopathy caused by PGB overdose. Continuous TWs on EEG were successfully treated by drug withdrawal. Therefore, clinicians should use PGB with caution, especially in patients who have impaired renal function and are older.
Anand etal. [503] provided a detailed description of PGB-associated TW cases. The patient was a 41-year-old woman who had received PGB for long-term treat­ment of neuropathic pain. Three days before admission, the patient developed som­nolence, disorientation and abnormal mental status. Renal function tests revealed renal failure. Brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed periventricular and sub­cortical white matter lesions (diabetic-related). EEG showed generalized periodic discharges with a triphasic morphology and a waveform with three main phases: a positive, sharp transient wave followed by a negative wave of relatively low ampli­tude. Discharges were bilaterally synchronized, occurred at a frequency of 1–2s, and were not affected by lorazepam administration. The combined consideration was toxic encephalopathy secondary to renal insufciency. Three days after the discontinuation of PGB and intravenous uids, the patient’s mental status improved signicantly. She was discharged, oriented and able to follow commands. A repeat
2 Antiseizure Medications
187
electroencephalogram showed improvement. The authors suggested that TWs resolved without improvement in renal function, further supporting pregabalin tox­icity as the cause of triphasic waves and encephalopathy. Underlying subcortical white matter lesions might be a precipitating factor in the evolution of tripha­sic waves.
Side Effects ofPregabalin
Most of the adverse reactions caused by pregabalin are mild to moderate in a dose­dependent manner. They mainly occur in the rst 2weeks of initial treatment, with drowsiness and dizziness being the most common. The risk of weight gain increased to 14% for patients receiving 600mg/day [504]. With rapid or abrupt discontinua­tion of PGB, symptoms such as insomnia, nausea, headache, anxiety, nervousness, irritability, hyperhidrosis, and diarrhea may occur. The long-term use of PGB can lead to physical dependence. There is a risk of abuse associated with its use, particu­larly in patients taking opioids or with a history of substance abuse. Baftiu etal. [505] described 593 reports of PGB-related adverse effects. The most common adverse effects included dizziness, weight gain, somnolence, withdrawal syndrome, fatigue, and rash.
Serotonin syndrome (SS) is a potentially fatal clinical syndrome caused by drugs with serotonergic properties. Prakash etal. [506] conducted a systematic review of case reports of SS associated with antiseizure drugs. Of the 76 patients enrolled, seven patients with SS were exposed to pregabalin at a median dosage of 150mg/ day. In four of these studies, there was a temporal association between PGB intake and the occurrence of SS.All patients with pregabalin-induced SS were also treated with another serotonergic agent. The main manifestations of SS induced by PGB include confusion, agitation, hallucinations, tremors, myoclonus, sweating, nausea, diarrhea, fever, hypertension, etc. The authors noted a need to be alert to the possi­ble incidence of SS induced by PGB, especially in patients taking another seroto­nergic drug at the same time.
Serious cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) mainly include Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and drug rash with eosino­philia and systemic symptoms (DRESS). Shukla etal. [507] performed a retro­spective analysis of clinical and epidemiological data on SCAR induced by ASMs. Among the patients with drug-related skin and subcutaneous tissue adverse events, 54.1% were female with SJS/TEN/DRESS, 75% of whom were adults (>18years old). Nearly 64% of drug-related SCARs were severe and resulted in patient death (3.5%), life-threatening conditions (11.5%) or hospitalization/pro­longed hospitalization (43.5%). The data from this study showed that pregabalin caused 213 (1.1%) SCAR events in the Asian population and was associated with a signicantly increased risk of SCARs in the Asian population (n = 68, P<0.0001). It is one of the most common antiseizure drugs that leads to SCARs in the Asian population.
Hamed etal. [508] explored the frequency and type of sexual dysfunction (SD) caused by PGB and its relationship with duration of use. A total of 75 patients were
188
W. Jing et al.
included, 31 (41.33%) of whom developed PGB-related SD.The patients presented with erectile dysfunction (n = 16, 51.61%), anorgasmia (n = 10, 32.26%), and decreased libido (n=11, 35.48%). SD mainly occurred within a few weeks at low therapeutic doses of PGB (50–100mg/day). Its severity was independent of dose. SD improved after several weeks of PGB discontinuation. The authors concluded that although SD is not a common adverse effect of PGB, it is important for clini­cians to discuss sexual function with patients and ask about the impact of PGB on sexual function.
Basic Research onPregabalin
Sobral etal. [509] investigated the effects of PGB and β-caryophyllene (a cannabi­noid receptor subtype 2 agonist) on pentylenetetrazol (PTZ)-induced seizures in rats. Adult male Wistar rats received β-caryophyllene (100mg/kg), PGB (40mg/ kg), or a combination of the two before PTZ (60mg/kg). Animals were monitored by video-EEG to measure the latency of myoclonic seizures, the latency of tonic– clonic seizures, the duration of tonic–clonic seizures, and the total seizure score. They assessed glial brillary acidic protein (GFAP) release and the expression lev­els of erythroid-associated Factor 2 (Nrf2), c-fos, and 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NT) in the frontal cortex. This study revealed that treatment with β-caryophyllene combined with PGB increased the latency of PTZ-induced myoclonic and tonic–clonic sei­zures and decreased the durations of tonic–clonic seizures and overall seizure score. Additionally, lower expression levels of GFAP, c-Fos, and 3-NT were observed in animals treated with β-caryophyllene and PGB. The authors suggested that β-caryophyllene and PGB may have synergistic effects on controlling PTZ- induced seizures.
Qureshi et al. [510] evaluated the combined antiseizure effect of pregabalin (PGB) and nimodipine (NMD) in a mouse model of acute seizures. The study showed that the combination of pregabalin and nimodipine treatment had a signi­cant protective effect on death at a dose of 30±2.5mg/kg. In addition, protection against mortality was highly signicant at doses ranging from 35± 5 mg/kg to 55±15mg/kg. This effect was superior to that of PGB, showing a synergistic effect. The authors speculated that NMD and PGB had synergistic anticonvulsant effects. However, clinical studies are needed to determine the effectiveness of this combina­tion in humans.
Imran et al. [511] described the effects of PGB on changes in abundance of acetylcholine-related energy metabolites and oxidative stress during SE.The results showed that acetylcholine (ACh) release increased by a factor of six to eight, glu­cose levels increased by 30%, lactate levels increased by a factor of four, extracel­lular glycerol concentrations increased by a factor of 10, and isoprostane levels increased by a factor of more than 20 after SE.Two hours after the administration of pilocarpine, pregabalin (100mg/kg) was injected intraperitoneally, and the sei­zures eventually stopped. Within 60–120min, the release of ACh decreased. The lactate/pyruvate ratio and glycerol and isoprostane levels were also signicantly reduced. The authors noted that ACh release in the hippocampus was closely related
2 Antiseizure Medications
189
to seizures in SE.This effect was attenuated upon regression of SE. Pregabalin treatment terminated seizures in a rat model of SE and attenuated cholinergic and metabolic changes within 2h.
Pregabalin intheTreatment ofPain
Tong etal. [512] evaluated the efcacy and safety of pregabalin for treating spinal cord injury (SCI)-related neuropathic pain. A total of eight RCTs involving four interventions (pregabalin, gabapentin, CBZ, and amitriptyline) were included in this study. Analysis of the results showed that according to the average pain inten­sity after treatment, the treatments in order of efcacy were pregabalin, gabapentin, amitriptyline, CBZ and placebo. Based on the proportion of patients who discontin­ued therapy due to adverse reactions, the order of drugs from highest to lowest was pregabalin, amitriptyline, CBZ, gabapentin and placebo. In addition, ve studies described the overall incidence of related adverse reactions, with pregabalin, gaba­pentin, and placebo representing the order of drugs from highest to lowest. The authors concluded that for patients with SCI-related neuropathic pain, pregabalin was most effective for relieving pain, while gabapentin performed better in terms of safety.
Onakpoya etal. [513] conducted a meta-analysis of the benets and disadvan­tages of pregabalin for treating neuropathic pain. A total of 28 trials (6087 partici­pants) were reviewed. The types of neuropathic pain explored included diabetic peripheral neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, sciatica (radicular pain), poststroke pain and SCI-related pain. The results showed that patients taking pregabalin reported a signicant reduction in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores com­pared to those taking the placebo (p<0.00001). The sleep disturbance score of the NRS was signicantly reduced (p<0.00001). However, the risk of adverse events signicantly increased (p<0.00001). Treatment was more likely to be discontin­ued due to adverse events (p<0.00001). The authors suggested that pregabalin may be benecial for certain symptoms of neuropathic pain. However, the increased risk of adverse events and associated discontinuation should be considered.
To understand the analgesic effects of pregabalin on chronic neuropathic pain in adults, Derry etal. [514] reviewed 45 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 11,906 participants for 2–16weeks of treatment. Postherpetic neuralgia, painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy, and mixed neuropathic pain accounted for the majority (85%). Treatment groups for the drug pregabalin were divided into those receiving 150, 300 and 600mg and compared with the placebo group. Research suggested that pregabalin is effective for treating postherpetic neuralgia, diabetes-related neuralgia and mixed or unclassied posttraumatic neuropathic pain but not for treating HIV-related neuralgia. There is insufcient evidence for the efcacy of PGB in treating central neuropathic pain. It had substantial effects on some patients. A subset of patients achieved moderate improvement. However, many patients do not achieve obvious effects or even stopped treatment.