Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5203_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgments
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1.4.3.1 Electrical Stimulation Kindling Model
- •1.4.2 Acute Epilepsy Models
- •1.4.2.1 Maximal Electroshock Seizure Model
- •1.4.2.3 Acute Pentylenetetrazol-Induced Seizure Model
- •1.4.2.4 Local Penicillin Model
- •1.4.3 Chronic Epilepsy Models
- •1.4.3.2 Kindling Model
- •1.4.3.3 Optogenetic Kindling Model
- •1.4.4 Poststatus Epilepticus Models
- •1.4.5 Genetic Models
- •1.4.5.1 Rodent Animal Models
- •Absence Seizure Models
- •1.4.5.2 Nonrodent Animal Models
- •Baboon Photosensitive Epilepsy Model
- •1.4.6.1 Posttraumatic Epilepsy Models
- •Fluid Percussion Injury Model
- •Controlled Cortical Impact Model
- •Impact Acceleration Model
- •1.4.6.2 Poststroke Epilepsy Models
- •1.4.6.3 Postinfection Epilepsy Models
- •1.5.1 Voltage-Gated Ion Channel Modulation Mechanism
- •1.5.1.1 Blocking Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels
- •1.5.1.2 Blocking Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels
- •1.5.1.3 Voltage-Gated Potassium Channel Enhancement
- •1.5.2 Blocking Excitatory Neurotransmission
- •1.5.4 Improving Neuronal GABAergic Inhibitory Function
- •1.5.4.3 Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
- •1.5.5 Other Mechanisms
- •1.5.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •2.1 Commonly Used Antiseizure Medications
- •2.1.1 First-Generation Antiseizure Medications (ASMs)
- •2.1.1.1 Carbamazepine
- •Drug Characteristics
- •2.1.1.2 Clonazepam
- •Drug Characteristics
- •Other Studies
- •2.1.1.3 Ethosuximide
- •Drug Characteristics
- •Other Studies
- •2.1.1.4 Phenobarbital
- •Drug Characterization
- •2.1.1.5 Primidone
- •Drug Characteristics
- •2.1.1.6 Valproic Acid
- •Drug Characteristics
- •Mental Illness
- •Migraine Prevention
- •Ischemic Stroke
- •Tumors
- •Others
- •Hepatic Impairment
- •Hyperammonemia (HA)
- •Dyskinesia
- •Others
- •Summary
- •2.1.1.7 Phenytoin Sodium
- •Drug Characteristics
- •Other Research
- •2.1.1.8 Nitrazepam
- •Drug Characteristics
- •Other Studies
- •2.1.2 Second-Generation Antiseizure Drugs
- •2.1.2.1 Lamotrigine
- •General Characteristics
- •Historical Evolution
- •Adverse Effects
- •Cutaneous Adverse Effects
- •Hematological Adverse Effects
- •Cardiovascular Adverse Effects
- •Miscellaneous
- •Fundamental Research
- •2.1.2.2 Levetiracetam
- •Drug Characteristics
- •Preclinical Research
- •2.1.2.3 Topiramate
- •Topiramate-Related Adverse Reactions
- •2.1.2.4 Gabapentin
- •Drug Characteristics
- •Preclinical Research
- •2.1.2.5 Pregabalin
- •Drug Characteristics
- •2.1.2.6 Clobazam
- •Drug Characteristics
- •2.1.2.7 Felbamate
- •Drug Characteristics
- •Evidence-Based Medical Research Regarding Felbamate
- •Other Studies Involving Felbamate
- •2.1.2.8 Vigabatrin
- •Drug Characteristics
- •Historical Evolution
- •Evidence-Based Medical Research
- •Side Effects
- •Basic Research
- •Other Research
- •2.1.2.9 Zonisamide
- •Drug Characteristics
- •2.1.3 Third-Generation Antiseizure Medications
- •2.1.3.1 Lacosamide
- •Medicinal Features
- •Recent Fundamental Research
- •Adverse Effects
- •Serum Concentrations
- •2.1.3.2 Perampanel
- •Other Studies
- •2.1.3.3 Brivaracetam
- •Evidence-Based Medical Research
- •Drug Characteristics
- •Historical Development
- •Evidence-Based Medical Research
- •Basic Research
- •Other Research
- •2.1.3.5 Tiagabine (TGB)
- •Drug Characteristics
- •Historical Development
- •Evidence-Based Medical Research
- •Side Effects
- •Basic Research
- •Other Research
- •2.2 New Antiseizure Medications under Study
- •2.2.1 Cannabidiol
- •2.2.1.1 Drug Characteristics
- •References
- •3.1.4 Discontinue Anti-Seizure Medications
- •3.3.6 Pharmacokinetic Changes
- •3.4.1.1 Physiological Stage
- •3.4.1.2 Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Ovarian Axis
- •3.4.1.3 Menstrual Cycle
- •3.5.1 Introduction
- •3.5.5 Conclusions
- •3.6 Acute Symptomatic Epileptic Seizures
- •3.6.2 Historical Evolution
- •3.6.4 Epidemiological Investigation
- •3.6.5 Clinical Manifestations
- •3.6.6 Predictor
- •3.7.4.2 Serotonin Transferrin
- •3.7.4.3 Night Monitoring
- •3.7.4.4 Others
- •References
- •4.1.1.1 Focal Onset Seizures
- •4.1.1.2 Generalized-Onset Seizures
- •Generalized-Onset Tonic, Clonic, or Atonic Seizures
- •Generalized-Onset Myoclonic Seizures
- •Myoclonic-Atonic Seizures
- •Epileptic Spasms
- •Absence Seizures
- •4.2.3.1 Pretreatment Assessment
- •4.2.3.4 First-Line Anti-seizure Medications
- •4.3.1.2 Epidemiology
- •4.3.1.5 Drug Selection
- •4.3.2.2 Epidemiology
- •4.3.3.1 Epidemiology
- •4.3.3.2 Pathophysiological Mechanism
- •4.3.4.2 Pathologic Typing
- •Historical Evolution
- •Molecular Pathological Characterization
- •4.3.4.4 Pathogenic Mechanisms
- •Glial Cell Dysfunction
- •Extrasynaptic Mechanisms
- •4.3.4.5 Treatment
- •Other Medications
- •4.3.5.1 Epidemiological Information.
- •4.3.5.2 Pathogenesis
- •4.3.5.3 Clinical Manifestations
- •4.3.5.4 Anti-seizure Medications
- •4.3.6.1 Rasmussen Encephalitis
- •4.3.6.2 Anti-GAD65-Associated Epilepsy
- •4.3.6.3 Paraneoplastic Antibody-Associated Epilepsy
- •4.3.7.1 Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy
- •Pathogenic Mechanisms
- •Treatment
- •4.3.7.2 Metabolic Encephalopathy
- •Hepatic Encephalopathy
- •4.3.7.3 Uremic Encephalopathy
- •Pathogenic Mechanisms
- •Treatment
- •4.3.7.4 Pulmonary Encephalopathy
- •Pathogenic Mechanisms
- •Treatment
- •4.3.7.5 Autoimmune-Related Encephalopathy
- •Hashimoto’s Encephalopathy
- •Pathogenic Mechanisms
- •Treatment
- •Lupus Encephalopathy
- •Pathogenic Mechanisms
- •Treatment
- •4.3.7.6 Toxic Encephalopathy
- •Carbon Monoxide Poisoning
- •Pathogenic Mechanisms
- •Treatment
- •Chronic Alcoholic Encephalopathy
- •Pathogenic Mechanisms
- •Treatment
- •4.3.7.7 Heroin-Induced Spongiform Leukoencephalopathy
- •Pathogenic Mechanisms
- •Treatment
- •4.3.7.8 Radiation Encephalopathy
- •Pathogenic Mechanisms
- •Treatment
- •4.3.8.1 Epidemiology
- •4.3.8.3 Anti-seizure Medication Selection
- •4.4.1.1 Historical Evolution
- •4.4.1.2 Epidemiology
- •4.4.1.5 Treatment
- •4.4.1.6 Prognosis
- •4.4.2.1 Historical Evolution
- •4.4.2.2 Epidemiological Investigation
- •Other Manifestations
- •4.4.2.6 Treatment
- •References

180
W. Jing et al.
damage processes. Transgenic mice expressing elevated levels of α2δ-1 developed
neuropathic pain even in the absence of nerve damage. Therefore, the analgesic
effect of gabapentin is thought to be due to inhibition of the calcium current by its
binding to the α2δ-1 subunit, which leads to a reduction in postsynaptic excitability.
However, gabapentin has not been shown to consistently inhibit the Ca2+ current [477].
To date, other mechanisms of analgesia are thought to exist [478]: (1) Gabapentin
inhibits the accumulation of α2δ-1 expression at the terminus of the presynaptic
dorsal horn and reduces the response to pain stimuli; (2) α2δ-1 can enhance the
release of neurotransmitters when calcium inow decreases, and gabapentin can
affect pain perception by inhibiting α2δ-1-mediated neurotransmitter release; (3)
analgesic effects are mediated by the facilitation of descending noradrenergic inhibition, the inhibition of descending serotonergic facilitation and cortical mechanisms affecting the limbic system; and (4) gabapentin inhibits the formation of new
excitatory synapses by blocking the binding of astrocyte-derived thromboreactive
proteins to α2δ-1. (5) The uptake of glutamate is stimulated by excitatory amino
acid transporters. (6) The inammatory response is inhibited after injury. (7)
Modulation of the affective component of pain.
Other Applications ofGabapentin
In addition to treating focal epilepsy and neuropathic pain, gabapentin can also be
used to treat restless leg syndrome, hiccups, drug withdrawal, and other conditions.
Persistent hiccups have a signicant impact on quality of life and can be a barrier to
stroke recovery. Chlorpromazine, the rst-line treatment for intractable hiccups, has
a sedative effect and may negatively affect participation in rehabilitation. Studies
have reported that gabapentin is effective in the treatment of hiccups in both the
general population and the poststroke population. The therapeutic dose ranges from
100mg each time, three times a day, to 400mg each time, twice a day, and the duration of treatment ranges from 2days to 5.5weeks [479].
Gabapentin may assist in benzodiazepine withdrawal treatment. A retrospective
study of 172 patients who developed benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms showed
that patients who received gabapentin as a benzodiazepine-assisted treatment took
less benzodiazepines and had a shorter hospital stay than did a control group who
did not receive gabapentin as a benzodiazepine-assisted treatment. This suggests
that gabapentin can be used as an adjunct therapy for patients withdrawing from
treatment with benzodiazepines [480].
Gabapentin has protective effects on the myocardium and can reduce ischemia–
reperfusion injury, which may be related to the activation of PI3K/Akt in the myocardium and the upregulation of GABAARδ in the spinal cord [481].
Gabapentin can improve sleep quality in patients with sensory nervous system diseases. A meta-analysis showed that compared with the placebo group,
the gabapentin group had a signicantly lower degree of sleep disturbance,
improved sleep quality, and a lower incidence of more than 5 awakenings at
night [482].

2 Antiseizure Medications
2.1.2.5 Pregabalin
Drug Characteristics
[Chemical name] (S)-3-(aminomethyl)-5-methylhexanoic acid
[Chemical structure]
181
[Molecular formula] C8H17NO
2
[Molecular weight] 159.23
[Indications]
Treatment of adult patients with focal epileptic seizures (with or without secondary
generalized seizures).
[Specication] 75mg, 150mg
[Dosage]
The therapeutic dose of pregabalin is 150–600mg/day. The starting dose is 150mg/
day, which is taken two to three times daily. According to the patient’s response and
tolerance, the dose can be increased to 300mg/day after 1week, and then 1week
later, the dose can be increased to the maximum dose of 600mg/day, which can be
taken on an empty stomach or with food.
[Adverse reactions] The most common adverse reactions are dizziness and drowsiness. Other common adverse reactions include dry mouth, edema, blurred vision,
weight gain and abnormal thinking.
Clinical Application andBasic Research
Historical Evolution ofPregabalin
Pregabalin (PGB) is a gabapentinoid that is structurally similar to the inhibitory
neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). It was approved in the United States
and the European Union in 2004 as an added medicine for adults with focal epilepsy. Since then, it has been approved for the treatment of focal epilepsy in children
older than 4years in the United States but has not been approved for pediatric use
in the European Union. PGB primarily binds to presynaptic voltage-gated calcium
channels on the α-2-δ subunit to reduce the release of excitatory neurotransmitters,
thereby exerting antiseizure effects.

182
W. Jing et al.
Pregabalin Monotherapy forFocal Epilepsy
Zhao etal. [483] designed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the effectiveness and safety of different ASMs in the treatment of focal epilepsy, which
included 11 pregabalin-related randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The results
showed that the efcacy of PGB on focal seizures was relatively high. Compared
with patients treated with topiramate and oxcarbazepine, patients treated with PGB
had the lowest risk of headache and nausea, although the risk of dizziness, drowsiness and fatigue increased. However, the overall risk of adverse events was low.
French etal. [484] evaluated the efcacy of PGB in the treatment of focal epilepsy by designing with historical controls converted to monotherapy. A total of 161
patients whose disease was poorly controlled by their original antiseizure drugs
were included in the study. Finally, 148 patients received 600mg/day or 150mg/day
pregabalin (4:1) in randomized double-blind monotherapy for 20weeks (8-week
conversion and 12-week monotherapy periods). The results showed that the rate of
epilepsy-related withdrawal in the 600mg/day PGB group was 27.5%, which was
signicantly lower than that in the historical control group (74% and 68%, respectively) (p= 0.001). This nding suggests that PGB is effective for treating focal
epilepsy as monotherapy. In addition, eight patients taking 600mg/day PGB and
two patients taking 150mg/day PGB achieved seizure-free status, and the overall
safety was consistent with that of previous trials. The authors concluded that pregabalin monotherapy is safe and effective in patients with poorly controlled focal
seizures.
To explore an effective and safe monotherapy regimen for newly diagnosed adult
patients with focal epilepsy, Kwan etal. [485] conducted a double-blinded, randomized, noninferiority study comparing pregabalin and lamotrigine. A total of 660
patients with new-onset epilepsy from 105 medical centers were randomly assigned
to the treatment groups (330 to pregabalin, 330 to lamotrigine). The initial doses of
150mg/day PGB and 100mg/day LTG were administered orally twice a day. As
needed, the maximum doses were increased to 600mg/day PGB and 500mg/day
LTG within 4weeks and were maintained for 52weeks. Overall, 622 patients completed the entire therapy (314 with PGB, 308 with LTG). Compared with those in
the LTG group, fewer patients in the PGB group achieved 6months or more without
seizures (52% vs. 68%). Dizziness (17% vs. 14%), drowsiness (9% vs. 4%), fatigue
(8% vs. 6%), and weight gain (6% vs. 2%) were more common in the PGB group.
The overall incidence of adverse events was similar between the two groups. The
authors speculated that PGB was similarly tolerable to LTG but might not be as
effective as LTG in treating newly diagnosed focal seizures in adults.
Bruin etal. [486] analyzed a total of 66 studies to determine the effectiveness and
tolerability of ASMs in the treatment of glioma-related epilepsy. The results showed
that phenytoin had the highest seizure-free rate after 6months of monotherapy.
After 12months, pregabalin and levetiracetam monotherapy showed the greatest
efcacy. In addition, levetiracetam was most effective at reducing seizures by ≥50%
at 6 and 12months of treatment. However, phenytoin and pregabalin showed the
highest treatment failure rates at 12months. Based on limited evidence, the authors

2 Antiseizure Medications
183
speculated that levetiracetam, phenytoin and pregabalin monotherapy would be
effective in glioma patients with epilepsy, with levetiracetam showing the lowest
treatment failure rate compared to the other ASMs studied.
Pregabalin intheTreatment ofGeneralized Tonic–Clonic Seizures
In a randomized, double-blinded, multicenter study [487] of 219 patients with generalized tonic–clonic seizures, 75, 72, and 72 patients were randomized to receive
5mg/kg/day pregabalin, 10mg/kg/day pregabalin, or placebo, respectively. There
were 15, 11, and 6 patients who discontinued 5mg/kg/day, 10mg/kg/day, and placebo, respectively, due to adverse events (10.7%, 6.9%, and 5.6%, respectively).
The results showed that there was no signicant change in the average 28-day seizure rate or response rate among the three groups. The most common AEs (≥10%)
were dizziness, headache, and somnolence, most of which were mild or moderate.
Therefore, pregabalin is not recommended for the treatment of generalized tonic–
clonic seizures.
Pregabalin intheTreatment ofRefractory Epilepsy
Pregabalin is an effective add-on treatment for focal seizures. The guideline summary recommends that pregabalin can effectively reduce the frequency of seizures
in adults with refractory focal epilepsy (Grade A) [488]. To evaluate the efcacy and
tolerability of pregabalin as an add-on treatment for drug-resistant focal epilepsy,
two groups [489, 490] conducted a systematic review of nine randomized controlled
trials. The results showed that pregabalin, as an add-on treatment for refractory
focal epilepsy, was signicantly more effective than placebo in reducing seizures by
50% or more and attaining seizure freedom. Furthermore, there was a certain dose–
response relationship. Doses ranging from 150 to 600mg/day were effective. As the
dose increased from 300 to 600mg/day, the chance of a response doubled, but tolerability issues occurred at higher doses. Compared with patients taking lamotrigine,
patients taking pregabalin were more likely to have a 50% or greater reduction in
seizure rates, but there was no signicant difference in seizure-free status between
patients taking each of the two drugs. Compared with those taking levetiracetam,
there was no signicant difference in the 50% or greater reduction in seizure rates
among patients taking pregabalin, but there was a relatively lower seizure-free rate
in patients who received an addition of pregabalin. However, the trials included in
this review were short in duration. Longer-term trials are needed to inform clinical
decisions.
To compare the efcacy of a new generation of antiseizure drugs in the treatment
of refractory epilepsy, Viteva etal. [491] conducted an open, prospective study in
which 1259 epilepsy patients participated and 47 patients received pregabalin. The
average age of these patients was 34.43±1.65years. The average duration of epilepsy was 19.96 ± 1.54 years. In addition, the average treatment dose was
333.51±1.47mg/day. Comparative analysis of the dynamic reduction in seizure
severity showed that treatment with PGB reduced seizure severity and frequency to

184
W. Jing et al.
a greater extent than treatment with oxcarbazepine or topiramate, but the retention
rate was signicantly lower. In addition, at the sixth month of treatment, patients
who received PGB had a greater incidence of adverse reactions (25.5%). The
authors speculated that pregabalin had a good dynamic improvement effect on the
severity and frequency of seizures. It was mainly effective for patients with focal
epilepsy, but its tolerability was lower than that of other ASMs.
Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-HS) is usually poorly controlled with antiseizure drugs. Androsova etal. [492] conducted a
study on the efcacy, tolerability and retention rate of different ASMs in the treatment of MTLE-HS.For comparison, a total of 3249 trials were included, with a
total of 767 patients. There were 73 patients who received PGB.The results showed
that most (92.1%) of the PGB was added as a third drug, with an average maximum
dose of 300mg/day and an average treatment time of 10±9.8months. Compared
with CBZ and levetiracetam, only 4.7% of patients were seizure free after 12months
of PGB treatment. The therapy failure rate was 41.9%. The incidence of adverse
reactions was high (27.4%), and the most common adverse reactions were drowsiness and weight gain. In addition, the retention rate of PGB was the lowest (40%).
The authors held that PGB had no obvious advantage in treating seizures in patients
with MTLE-HS.
Pregabalin intheTreatment ofRefractory Status Epilepticus
There is currently insufcient evidence to support the effectiveness of PGB in the
treatment of refractory and superrefractory status epilepticus [493]. It is recommended to combine pregabalin with high-level anesthetics such as propofol, midazolam, thiopental, and ketamine [494].
Novy etal. [495] reported that a clear electroclinical response was observed in 5
of 11 RSE patients treated with PGB. This effect was obvious 24 h after PGB
administration. Possible reactions were noted on three occasions when PGB was
combined with other antiseizure drugs. The remaining three patients had no obvious
response after PGB administration. The response of PGB in the treatment of focal
SE appeared to be better than that of generalized convulsive SE.
Swisher etal. [496] administered a combination of intravenous phenytoin (PHT),
levetiracetam (median dose of LEV, 3000 mg/day), and oral pregabalin (median
dose of PGB, 375mg/day) for RSE in 23 patients with primary or metastatic brain
tumors. The results showed that SE in 16 patients (70%) stopped on average 24h
after the addition of the third antiseizure drug. No related adverse reactions occurred.
These ndings suggest that the combination of PHT, LEV, and PGB may be safe
and efcient for the treatment of RSE in patients with brain tumors.
Another retrospective study [497] included 21 patients with frequent nonconvulsive seizures (NCSs) and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). The patients
were treated with PGB at an average therapeutic dose of 342mg/day. Ultimately, 11
patients (52%) achieved an electroclinical response. This result suggests that PGB
was more effective for halting NCS (nine patients, 82%) than for preventing NCSE
(two patients, 18%). Additionally, seizures were halted in 67% of brain tumor

2 Antiseizure Medications
185
patients. However, none of the patients (four patients) with anoxic injury responded
to PGB.In addition, PGB was well-tolerated by most patients after treatment, with
only two patients experiencing dizziness and sedation. These ndings suggest that
pregabalin may be a safe option as an add-on treatment for critically ill patients with
nonconvulsive seizures and nonconvulsive status epilepticus when conventional
therapy fails.
Pregabalin inSpecial Populations withEpilepsy
Mann etal. [498] used video electroencephalography (VEEG) monitoring to evaluate the efcacy and safety of pregabalin as an add-on treatment for focal epilepsy in
children (1month to 4years old). They randomized 175 pediatric patients (mean
age 28.2months, 59% male) at a 2:1:2 ratio to receive 7mg/kg/day pregabalin,
14mg/kg/day pregabalin or placebo. The results showed that compared with that in
the placebo group (n=53, P=0.022), the 24-h seizure rate was 35% lower in the
PGB 14mg/kg/day (n=28) group. However, the seizure rate in the PGB 7mg/kg/
day (n=59) group did not signicantly improve. In addition, the most common AEs
in the PGB 7mg/kg/day, 14mg/kg/day, and placebo treatment groups were somnolence (11.3%, 17.6%, and 5.7%, respectively) and upper respiratory tract infection
(7.0%, 11.8%, and 11.4%, respectively). The severity of all AEs was mild to moderate. The authors considered that 14mg/kg/day pregabalin could signicantly reduce
the rate of focal seizures in children. Pregabalin at 7mg/kg/day and 14mg/kg/day
was generally safe and well tolerated in children aged 1month to 4years.
To better understand the efcacy and tolerability of pregabalin as an add-on
treatment for focal seizures in children (4–16 years old), Antinew et al. [499]
designed a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study. A total of 295
children (mean age 10.2years, 55% male) were randomized to receive PGB 2.5mg/
kg/day (n=104), PGB 10mg/kg/day (n=97), or placebo (n=94). The treatment
was double-blinded and lasted for 12weeks (dose escalation for 2weeks, xed dose
for 10weeks). The data showed that the 28-day seizure rate of children in the 10mg/
kg/day PGB group was signicantly lower than that in the placebo group (19.9%,
P=0.0185). The 2.5mg/kg/day PGB group showed no signicant improvement in
seizure frequency (P=0.2577). In addition, the response rate of the PGB 10mg/kg/
day group (40.6%, P=0.0068) was signicantly better than that of the PGB 2.5mg/
kg/day group (29.1%, P = 0.26) and placebo group (22.6%). Common adverse
events (≥10%) in the 10mg/kg/day PGB, 2.5mg/kg/day PGB, and placebo groups
included somnolence (25.8%, 17.3%, 13.8%), weight gain (13.4%, 3.8%, 4.3%)
and increased appetite (10.3%, 6.7%, 4.3%). The authors concluded that 10mg/kg/
day PGB effectively reduced the frequency of focal seizures in children and was
well tolerated.
Chan etal. [500] used population pharmacokinetics (PK) and exposure-response
(ER) relationships to summarize data related to pregabalin concentration and efcacy. They analyzed and compared the relationship between pregabalin exposure
and ER in children and adults with focal epilepsy. Population PK simulations
showed that for children aged 4–16years and weighing ≥30kg, 2.5–10mg/kg/day

186
W. Jing et al.
PGB was required to achieve steady-state exposure concentrations similar to those
of adult patients receiving approved doses of 150–600mg/day. For children aged
4–16 years weighing <30 kg, 3.5–14 mg/kg/day PGB was required to achieve
equivalent exposure. The ndings support the guidance of PGB dosing provided in
the guidelines. Pediatric patients (4–16years old) weighing <30kg should receive
a 40% higher dose of PGB per kilogram of body weight than patients weighing
≥30kg to achieve similar exposure.
Regarding the study of pregabalin in the treatment of women, a population-based
cohort study was conducted through population registries (2005–2016) in four
Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden). This research examined the association between prenatal exposure to pregabalin and the risk of adverse
delivery and postpartum neurodevelopmental outcomes. The results showed that
prenatal exposure to pregabalin was not associated with low birth weight, prematurity, small gestational age, low Apgar score, microcephaly, autism spectrum disorder or intellectual disability. The increased risk of any major congenital
malformations and ADHD was unlikely to be greater than 1.8 [501].
Effect ofPregabalin onElectroencephalography
Parekh etal. [502] described a rare case of PGB-induced triphasic waves (TWs).
The patient was a 74-year-old man with diabetes-related peripheral neuropathy. He
had a history of chronic kidney disease and long-term use of PGB (75mg, twice
daily). For pain relief within 8h, the patient received 450mg of PGB and subsequently developed altered mental status, somnolence and disorientation. Bedside
EEG showed continuous TWs with slow background activity, ruling out nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Forty-eight hours after the discontinuation of PGB, the
patient was conscious and alert. Seventy-two hours later, the repeat EEG did not
show any TWs. On the fth day after admission, the patient’s mental status fully
recovered. The authors determined that this case was acute reversible toxic encephalopathy caused by PGB overdose. Continuous TWs on EEG were successfully
treated by drug withdrawal. Therefore, clinicians should use PGB with caution,
especially in patients who have impaired renal function and are older.
Anand etal. [503] provided a detailed description of PGB-associated TW cases.
The patient was a 41-year-old woman who had received PGB for long-term treatment of neuropathic pain. Three days before admission, the patient developed somnolence, disorientation and abnormal mental status. Renal function tests revealed
renal failure. Brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed periventricular and subcortical white matter lesions (diabetic-related). EEG showed generalized periodic
discharges with a triphasic morphology and a waveform with three main phases: a
positive, sharp transient wave followed by a negative wave of relatively low amplitude. Discharges were bilaterally synchronized, occurred at a frequency of 1–2s,
and were not affected by lorazepam administration. The combined consideration
was toxic encephalopathy secondary to renal insufciency. Three days after the
discontinuation of PGB and intravenous uids, the patient’s mental status improved
signicantly. She was discharged, oriented and able to follow commands. A repeat

2 Antiseizure Medications
187
electroencephalogram showed improvement. The authors suggested that TWs
resolved without improvement in renal function, further supporting pregabalin toxicity as the cause of triphasic waves and encephalopathy. Underlying subcortical
white matter lesions might be a precipitating factor in the evolution of triphasic waves.
Side Effects ofPregabalin
Most of the adverse reactions caused by pregabalin are mild to moderate in a dosedependent manner. They mainly occur in the rst 2weeks of initial treatment, with
drowsiness and dizziness being the most common. The risk of weight gain increased
to 14% for patients receiving 600mg/day [504]. With rapid or abrupt discontinuation of PGB, symptoms such as insomnia, nausea, headache, anxiety, nervousness,
irritability, hyperhidrosis, and diarrhea may occur. The long-term use of PGB can
lead to physical dependence. There is a risk of abuse associated with its use, particularly in patients taking opioids or with a history of substance abuse. Baftiu etal.
[505] described 593 reports of PGB-related adverse effects. The most common
adverse effects included dizziness, weight gain, somnolence, withdrawal syndrome,
fatigue, and rash.
Serotonin syndrome (SS) is a potentially fatal clinical syndrome caused by drugs
with serotonergic properties. Prakash etal. [506] conducted a systematic review of
case reports of SS associated with antiseizure drugs. Of the 76 patients enrolled,
seven patients with SS were exposed to pregabalin at a median dosage of 150mg/
day. In four of these studies, there was a temporal association between PGB intake
and the occurrence of SS.All patients with pregabalin-induced SS were also treated
with another serotonergic agent. The main manifestations of SS induced by PGB
include confusion, agitation, hallucinations, tremors, myoclonus, sweating, nausea,
diarrhea, fever, hypertension, etc. The authors noted a need to be alert to the possible incidence of SS induced by PGB, especially in patients taking another serotonergic drug at the same time.
Serious cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) mainly include Stevens-Johnson
syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS). Shukla etal. [507] performed a retrospective analysis of clinical and epidemiological data on SCAR induced by ASMs.
Among the patients with drug-related skin and subcutaneous tissue adverse
events, 54.1% were female with SJS/TEN/DRESS, 75% of whom were adults
(>18years old). Nearly 64% of drug-related SCARs were severe and resulted in
patient death (3.5%), life-threatening conditions (11.5%) or hospitalization/prolonged hospitalization (43.5%). The data from this study showed that pregabalin
caused 213 (1.1%) SCAR events in the Asian population and was associated with
a signicantly increased risk of SCARs in the Asian population (n = 68,
P<0.0001). It is one of the most common antiseizure drugs that leads to SCARs
in the Asian population.
Hamed etal. [508] explored the frequency and type of sexual dysfunction (SD)
caused by PGB and its relationship with duration of use. A total of 75 patients were

188
W. Jing et al.
included, 31 (41.33%) of whom developed PGB-related SD.The patients presented
with erectile dysfunction (n = 16, 51.61%), anorgasmia (n = 10, 32.26%), and
decreased libido (n=11, 35.48%). SD mainly occurred within a few weeks at low
therapeutic doses of PGB (50–100mg/day). Its severity was independent of dose.
SD improved after several weeks of PGB discontinuation. The authors concluded
that although SD is not a common adverse effect of PGB, it is important for clinicians to discuss sexual function with patients and ask about the impact of PGB on
sexual function.
Basic Research onPregabalin
Sobral etal. [509] investigated the effects of PGB and β-caryophyllene (a cannabinoid receptor subtype 2 agonist) on pentylenetetrazol (PTZ)-induced seizures in
rats. Adult male Wistar rats received β-caryophyllene (100mg/kg), PGB (40mg/
kg), or a combination of the two before PTZ (60mg/kg). Animals were monitored
by video-EEG to measure the latency of myoclonic seizures, the latency of tonic–
clonic seizures, the duration of tonic–clonic seizures, and the total seizure score.
They assessed glial brillary acidic protein (GFAP) release and the expression levels of erythroid-associated Factor 2 (Nrf2), c-fos, and 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NT) in the
frontal cortex. This study revealed that treatment with β-caryophyllene combined
with PGB increased the latency of PTZ-induced myoclonic and tonic–clonic seizures and decreased the durations of tonic–clonic seizures and overall seizure score.
Additionally, lower expression levels of GFAP, c-Fos, and 3-NT were observed in
animals treated with β-caryophyllene and PGB. The authors suggested that
β-caryophyllene and PGB may have synergistic effects on controlling PTZ- induced
seizures.
Qureshi et al. [510] evaluated the combined antiseizure effect of pregabalin
(PGB) and nimodipine (NMD) in a mouse model of acute seizures. The study
showed that the combination of pregabalin and nimodipine treatment had a signicant protective effect on death at a dose of 30±2.5mg/kg. In addition, protection
against mortality was highly signicant at doses ranging from 35± 5 mg/kg to
55±15mg/kg. This effect was superior to that of PGB, showing a synergistic effect.
The authors speculated that NMD and PGB had synergistic anticonvulsant effects.
However, clinical studies are needed to determine the effectiveness of this combination in humans.
Imran et al. [511] described the effects of PGB on changes in abundance of
acetylcholine-related energy metabolites and oxidative stress during SE.The results
showed that acetylcholine (ACh) release increased by a factor of six to eight, glucose levels increased by 30%, lactate levels increased by a factor of four, extracellular glycerol concentrations increased by a factor of 10, and isoprostane levels
increased by a factor of more than 20 after SE.Two hours after the administration
of pilocarpine, pregabalin (100mg/kg) was injected intraperitoneally, and the seizures eventually stopped. Within 60–120min, the release of ACh decreased. The
lactate/pyruvate ratio and glycerol and isoprostane levels were also signicantly
reduced. The authors noted that ACh release in the hippocampus was closely related

2 Antiseizure Medications
189
to seizures in SE.This effect was attenuated upon regression of SE. Pregabalin
treatment terminated seizures in a rat model of SE and attenuated cholinergic and
metabolic changes within 2h.
Pregabalin intheTreatment ofPain
Tong etal. [512] evaluated the efcacy and safety of pregabalin for treating spinal
cord injury (SCI)-related neuropathic pain. A total of eight RCTs involving four
interventions (pregabalin, gabapentin, CBZ, and amitriptyline) were included in
this study. Analysis of the results showed that according to the average pain intensity after treatment, the treatments in order of efcacy were pregabalin, gabapentin,
amitriptyline, CBZ and placebo. Based on the proportion of patients who discontinued therapy due to adverse reactions, the order of drugs from highest to lowest was
pregabalin, amitriptyline, CBZ, gabapentin and placebo. In addition, ve studies
described the overall incidence of related adverse reactions, with pregabalin, gabapentin, and placebo representing the order of drugs from highest to lowest. The
authors concluded that for patients with SCI-related neuropathic pain, pregabalin
was most effective for relieving pain, while gabapentin performed better in terms
of safety.
Onakpoya etal. [513] conducted a meta-analysis of the benets and disadvantages of pregabalin for treating neuropathic pain. A total of 28 trials (6087 participants) were reviewed. The types of neuropathic pain explored included diabetic
peripheral neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, sciatica (radicular pain), poststroke
pain and SCI-related pain. The results showed that patients taking pregabalin
reported a signicant reduction in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores compared to those taking the placebo (p<0.00001). The sleep disturbance score of the
NRS was signicantly reduced (p<0.00001). However, the risk of adverse events
signicantly increased (p<0.00001). Treatment was more likely to be discontinued due to adverse events (p<0.00001). The authors suggested that pregabalin
may be benecial for certain symptoms of neuropathic pain. However, the
increased risk of adverse events and associated discontinuation should be
considered.
To understand the analgesic effects of pregabalin on chronic neuropathic pain
in adults, Derry etal. [514] reviewed 45 randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
with a total of 11,906 participants for 2–16weeks of treatment. Postherpetic
neuralgia, painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy, and mixed neuropathic pain
accounted for the majority (85%). Treatment groups for the drug pregabalin
were divided into those receiving 150, 300 and 600mg and compared with the
placebo group. Research suggested that pregabalin is effective for treating
postherpetic neuralgia, diabetes-related neuralgia and mixed or unclassied
posttraumatic neuropathic pain but not for treating HIV-related neuralgia. There
is insufcient evidence for the efcacy of PGB in treating central neuropathic
pain. It had substantial effects on some patients. A subset of patients achieved
moderate improvement. However, many patients do not achieve obvious effects
or even stopped treatment.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
