Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5776_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
119Arterial Pathology
Valdueza et al., Neurosonology and Neuroimaging of Stroke: A Comprehensive Reference, Second Edition (ISBN 978-3-13-141872-2), copyright © 2017 Thieme Medical Publishers
All rights reserved. Usage subject to terms and conditions of license.
Area reduction [%]
96846436
600
500
400
300
200
100
Blood volume flow (mL/min)
0 0
Diameter reduction [%]
Fig. A5.34 Mathematical fl ow model in ICA stenosis (Spencer’s
curve). Theoretical relationship of stenosis grade (assessed by diameter and area measurements) and systolic blood fl ow velocity
(blue line) within the stenosis. In very high-grade stenosis velocity
values drop, and they further decrease in near-occlusion. Note the
blood volume fl ow (red line) values remain constant until a 70–80%
diameter reduction, defi ning the start of a hemodynamic relevant
stenosis. (Adapted from Spencer and Reid 1979.)
300
200
Flow velocity (cm/s)
100
100806040200
in the region with maximal lumen reduction from the inner border zone of the wall. The grade of stenosis is calculated from the relation of the total vessel diameter (D
and the minimal stenosis diameter:
Grade (%) = D
stenosis/Dtotal
× 100
total
Area: Unlike DSA but similar to CTA and (with some restrictions) to MRI, duplex ultrasound allows measurement and calculation of the grade of stenosis from the
vessel’s cross-sectional area, a parameter which correlates
best with results derived from postoperative histologic
planimetric analysis (Alexandrov et al 1993, Eckstein et al
2001). It is the true relevant anatomic parameter for the
measured fl ow velocities according to the physics of fl ow.
Area measurement is also independent of the morphological confi guration of the stenosis, while the diameter
approach only measures correctly in the case of a cylindrical stenosis. The grade of stenosis is calculated from
the relation of the total vessel area (A
stenosis diameter (A
Grade (%) = A
stenosis
):
stenosis/Atotal
) and the minimal
total
× 100
Examples of both diameter and area measurements are
given in Fig. A5.32. Although assessed in exactly the same
vessel segment, the two methods yield diff erent results. The
diameter calculation (D
in a 62% stenosis, the area calculation (A
= 10.1 mm2) in 81% stenosis. This phenomenon can
A
stenosis
also be described mathematically (Fig. A5.33). Depending
= 9 mm, D
total
= 3.4 mm) results
stenosis
= 52.4 mm2,
total
on the type of stenosis (axisymmetric or asymmetric) the
nonlinear relation between area and diameter varies in favor
of diameter or area (Spencer and Reid 1979). Up to now all
major clinical trials with catheter angiography as the main
method have used the diameter approach, so it will currently continue to be the preferred method of assessment. In the
future, however, the area method recommended for duplex
sonography in the 1990s (de Bray and Glatt 1995) will probably gain importance, particularly considering the increasing use of the CTA technique, with which it is also possible
to perform exact planimetric cross-sectional measurements
(Bartlett et al 2007).
Direct Hemodynamic Assessment
Hemodynamic eff ects can be observed using the color
mode of the ultrasound system. The color signal not only
reveals the regions with preserved fl ow but also gives in-
formation about fl ow direction (antegrade or retrograde
fl ow). Furthermore, a color-aliasing phenomenon may indicate the presence of raised fl ow velocities, such as those
caused by a stenosis of at least medium grade. However,
the main source of hemodynamic information is provided by the Doppler spectrum analysis, from which several
parameters can be derived.
Blood Flow Velocity: Blood fl ow velocity values, i.e., the
maximal systolic velocity (also referred to as peak velocity), maximal end-diastolic fl ow velocity, or the mean fl ow
velocity, are derived from the Doppler spectrum (for further details see Chapter 3, “Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity”).
)
Their assessment may reveal normal, raised, or reduced
values. Vessel narrowing is directly correlated with increased fl ow velocities but this relation is not linear over
the whole range of stenosis grades. In very high-grade
stenosis and near-occlusion, fl ow velocity drops to normal
or below normal values, as demonstrated in the Spencer’s
curve (Fig. A5.34). According to this curve, which was
developed to describe fl ow properties in a straight vessel
without bifurcation and an axisymmetric stenosis, the initial increase in fl ow velocity compensates the lumen re-
duction to maintain a constant blood fl ow volume. With a
stenosis of 70% (which correspond to an area reduction of
90%) or more, the blood fl ow volume drops despite a fur-
ther increase of fl ow velocity. When the stenosis reaches
~85% the blood fl ow velocity also starts to fall. The same
velocity may therefore be seen in a 60% stenosis as in a 90%
stenosis (rising or falling shoulder of the curve). To assess
the grade of stenosis correctly it is crucial to consider the
pre- and poststenotic waveforms as well as the presence of
collateral vessel activation. These indirect signs are of paramount importance for confi dent grading of stenoses. Note
that the defi nition of a hemodynamically relevant stenosis
refers to the decreased blood volume fl ow and not to an
increased blood fl ow velocity; this term should therefore
be used only for a stenosis of at least 70–80%.
The Spencer’s curve was mainly developed to predict
arterial hemodynamics in a proximal ICA stenosis, and
has several limitations. For instance, it applies to short and
a x i s y m m e t r i c c o n c e n t r i c s t e n o s e s , w h e r e a s p a t i e n t s w i t h
macroangiopathic lesions usually reveal irregular, eccentric stenoses of diff ering lengths. Atherosclerotic stenoses
are usually short compared with stenoses caused by vessel
dissection or arteritis. Long-segmented stenoses will be
underestimated as high fl ow velocities are usually missed

120 5 Vascular Pathology
Valdueza et al., Neurosonology and Neuroimaging of Stroke: A Comprehensive Reference, Second Edition (ISBN 978-3-13-141872-2), copyright © 2017 Thieme Medical Publishers
All rights reserved. Usage subject to terms and conditions of license.
Fig. A5.35 Increased fl ow in the VAs in bilateral ICA occlusion.
Left: Ce-MRA, anterior MIP, showing bilateral ICA occlusion (ar-
rowheads) and a bilaterally pronounced VA signal (arrows). Right:
Duplex sonography, longitudinal plane, color-mode image and
corresponding Doppler spectrum analysis: Turbulent fl ow and in-
creased fl ow velocities in the right V2-VA, diameter 3.9 mm, fl ow
velocity 93/44 cm/s (top) and in the left V2-VA, diameter 4.1 mm,
fl ow velocity 108/48 cm/s (bottom). Identical fl ow patterns were
observed in the intracranial VAs and BA. Note, the mild poststenotic and turbulent fl ow aspect results from the increased VA fl ow.
in such conditions. Also, Spencer’s model implies straight
vessel walls resembling a channel: However, the major site
of stenotic lesions in extracranial brain-supplying vessels is
the proximal ICA which has a physiologic proximal widening, the carotid bulb. The carotid bulb is rarely absent but
has a highly variable diameter ranging from normal to pseudo-aneurysmatic dilation doubling the normal ICA diameter
(see also Chapter 2, “Extracranial Arterial Anatomy” under
“General Arterial Anatomy”). Because of this physiologic dilation a nonlaminar fl ow, even with partly retrograde fl ow
components, is the usual duplex ultrasound appearance and
should not be misinterpreted. A bulb stenosis of ~30% may
therefore not reduce the intraluminal diameter compared
with that of the distal ICA segment and may even “normalize” the fl ow signal by showing fl ow that is now laminar. A
50% stenosis would also not alter waveform and velocities
and a local 80% stenosis might not lead to any hemodynamic
compromise. The carotid bulb therefore makes interpretation of velocity data somehow diffi cult. The good news is
that all the other brain-supplying vessels follow the prediction of the Spencer’s curve better, as they normally do not
have a bulb equivalent. According to the model a 50% stenosis should double blood fl ow velocities and a 70% stenosis
should lead to a fourfold increase in velocity. Despite these
and other shortcomings, sonographers should use the Spencer’s curve as the basic tool to understand hemodynamics
and the consequences of brain-supplying artery stenosis.
It is important to know that raised fl ow velocities are
not limited to lumen reductions. For example, a global
velocity increase may be observed in hemodilution and
anemia to compensate for the loss of oxygen transporters, or in increased blood volume fl ow (hyperperfusion)
which may be seen in the early phase following severe
head trauma, in the subacute phase after subarachnoid
hemorrhage, or in general hypoxia. In all these conditions
fl ow velocities are globally increased. Segmental hyper-
A
Fig. A5.36 Doppler spectra, obtained from follow-up transcranial insonation of the MCA in a patient with severe hypoxia.
(A) Normal blood fl ow and fl ow velocity. (B) Hyperperfusion—note
the increased fl ow velocities as well as the reduced pulsatility.
(C) Hypoperfusion—note the reduced fl ow velocity as well as the
increased pulsatility resembling an extracranial fl ow signal (“no
brain, no fl ow”).
B
C
perfusion and concomitant raised fl ow velocities are ob-
served in extra- and intracranial collateral fl ow pathways
in steno-occlusive disorders, e.g., in the anterior (ACoA) or
posterior (PCoA) communicating arteries or extracranially
in the neck vessels in occlusions of other major vessels. For
example, in bilateral VA occlusion an increased blood fl ow
and a corresponding increase in fl ow velocity is expected in
one or both ICAs (see also Case 41). Contrarily and more evidently, in bilateral ICA occlusion raised blood fl ow and fl ow
velocity may be observed in the extra- and intracranial segments of the VAs and the BA (Fig. A5.35; see also Case 12).
Similar fi ndings will be encountered in feeding vessels of ar-
teriovenous angiomas or dural fi stulas (see also Case 34 and
Case 40). In all these cases the diastolic fl ow velocity will
be disproportionately high, indicating a loss of peripheral
resistance and dilation of the low-resistance vessels. Conversely, global low fl ow velocities can be observed if the he-
matocrit is high (Brass et al 1988), in severe cardiac output
failure, in generalized dilated intracranial vessels—usually in
long-standing arterial hypertension—or in the chronic state
after severe head trauma or hypoxia. Regional fl ow velocity
reductions may indicate hemodynamically relevant occlusive processes proximal or distal to the measurement site.
All the above-mentioned conditions obviously hinder a simple interpretation of velocity ratios. A sophisticated analysis
therefore needs a critical overview of all accessible direct
and indirect ultrasound fi ndings. Furthermore, the optimal
time for insonation must also be considered. In the fi rst
hours of severe global cerebral hypoxia, a distinct reduction
of cerebral blood fl ow and consequently of blood fl ow ve-
locity occurs. Subsequently a reactive hyperemic phase can
be observed, comprising generally increased fl ow velocities
as well as reduced pulsatility. If the hypoxia leads to massive
brain tissue necrosis, such as in persistent vegetative state,
the chronic phase may reveal low fl ow velocities and a high
pulsatility similar to the profi les seen in the ECA. A similar

121Arterial Pathology
Valdueza et al., Neurosonology and Neuroimaging of Stroke: A Comprehensive Reference, Second Edition (ISBN 978-3-13-141872-2), copyright © 2017 Thieme Medical Publishers
All rights reserved. Usage subject to terms and conditions of license.
Fig. A5.37 CCT and TCCS in chronic MCA infarc tion. Left: CCT
scan, axial planes showing a residual almost complete territorial
MCA infarction. Right: TCCS (transtemporal approach), right-sided
insonation, midbrain plane, color-mode image and Doppler spectrum analysis of the M1-MCA: Reduced fl ow velocity of 58/15 and
increased PI of 1.84 in the aff ected side (top) compared with the
contralateral M1-MCA (insonated via the same side) with normal
fl ow velocity of 68/28 mm/s and PI of 1.07 (bottom).
phenomenon occurs after large territorial infarctions in the
involved arteries (Fig. A5.36, Fig. A5.37, Fig. A5.38).
Blood fl ow velocity measurement in the brain-supplying
arteries crucially depends on the angle of correction as this
greatly aff ects the fi nal velocity measurement (for further
details see Chapter 1, “Doppler Shift and Flow Velocity” under “Ultrasound Principles,” and Chapter 3, “Cerebral Blood
Flow Velocity” under “Parameters of Cerebral Hemodynamics”). In nonpathologic vessels angle correction should preferentially be done parallel to the vessel walls, which usually
corresponds to the fl ow stream visualized in the color mode.
In a stenosed vessel the fl ow may diff er from the anatomic
course of the vessel due to eccentric stenoses. Here, the angle should be corrected according to the fl ow stream (also
called the “jet”). A Doppler angle greater than 60° should be
avoided as it may lead to velocity overestimation. This problem particularly occurs in V2-VA insonation as the vessel
course is practically at a 90° angle in relation to the ultrasound beam, which already causes problems in the colormode visualization of fl ow. We recommend improving the
insonation angle by mild angulation of the probe into the
soft neck tissue. Intracranially, nonoptimal insonation angles occur during the insonation of the A2-ACA, PCoA, and
the transitional zone between the proximal and the distal
P2-PCA, as well as during coronal transtemporal insonation
of distal ICA and BA.
Velocity Ratios: As discussed earlier, fl ow velocity meas-
urements give only surrogate information about blood
fl ow. Under physiologic conditions cerebral blood fl ow
and fl ow velocities are well correlated. In pathologic
conditions, high velocities may still refl ect normal blood
fl ow (e.g., in nonhemodynamically relevant stenosis),
decreased blood fl ow (e.g., in hemodynamically relevant
stenosis), and even increased blood fl ow (e.g., in hyper-
perfusion). High velocities might even be caused by a
mixture of stenosis and hyperperfusion which may be
A
C
Fig. A5.38 MRI and TCCS in complete MCA infarction. (A) 3D TOFMRA, coronal view, indicating proximal MCA occlusion (arrow).
(B) MRI, T2-weighted image, axial view. M1-MCA fl ow void with
reduced diameter compared with the contralateral side (arrow)
indicating residual fl ow. (C–E) TCCS, transtemporal approach, ax-
ial midbrain plane, color-mode and corresponding Doppler spectra. (C) Normal PRF and color gain TCCS settings easily depicting
the main stems of the contralateral MCA, both ACAs, and PCAs.
Ipsilateral proximal MCA vessel sheath is visible within the lateral
fi ssure but M1-MCA is missed (arrow), wrongly suggesting occlusion. (D,E) Reduced PRF and increased color gain result in aliasing
of color signals (“dirty image”) now showing a proximal MCA color
signal (arrow) and a fl ow signal with low fl ow velocities (15/6 cm/s).
B
D
E
observed in the subacute phase after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) (simultaneous presence of hyperperfusion
and vasospasm). In addition to pure velocity measurements, velocity ratios comparing homologous vessels on
both sides or intra- and prestenotic or intra- and poststenotic signals on the ipsilateral side may be of help.
ICA/CCA Index: The index is calculated from the maximal systolic fl ow velocity within the ICA stenosis
(V
ICA syst stenosis
within the ipsilateral CCA (V
that is independent of general blood fl ow alterations,
) and the maximal systolic fl ow velocity
). It is a parameter
CCA syst
but it only works if the CCA is itself not aff ected by ath-
erosclerotic vessel wall changes.
ICA/CCA index = V
ICA syst stenosis/VCCA syst
ICA/ICA Index: The index is calculated from the maximal
systolic fl ow velocity within the ICA stenosis (V
ICA syst stenosis
)

122 5 Vascular Pathology
Valdueza et al., Neurosonology and Neuroimaging of Stroke: A Comprehensive Reference, Second Edition (ISBN 978-3-13-141872-2), copyright © 2017 Thieme Medical Publishers
All rights reserved. Usage subject to terms and conditions of license.
200
150
100
50
BA
DCBA
DC
Fig. A5.39 Top: Schematic of fl ow pattern in a normal and in an in-
creasingly stenosed blood vessel. Bottom: Corresponding Doppler
spectra: (A) Preserved systolic window in the unaff ected vessel (ar-
row); (B) Turbulent fl ow with spectral broadening and disappearing
systolic window but still normal velocity; (C) Turbulent fl ow with in-
creased velocity indicating a higher grade of stenosis; (D) Severe turbulent fl ow with retrograde fl ow components and high fl ow velocity.
and the maximal systolic fl ow velocity of the contra-
lateral (unaff ected) ICA (V
ICA/ICA index = V
ICA syst contralateral
ica syst stenosis/VICA syst contralateral
).
It only works if the contralateral ICA shows normal fl ow
profi les. Flow velocity measurement should not be per-
formed in the carotid bulb but in a straight segment of
the unaltered ICA. Because of this limitation the ICA/
ICA index is not commonly used. The angle-corrected
intrastenotic fl ow velocities of the ICA may be compared
with the fl ow velocities of the distal ICA. To get reliable
values the poststenotic fl ow signals should not be dis-
turbed and a suffi cient length of the distal ICA must be
visualized to use angle correction. This index resembles
the Lindegaard Index (LI) which is widely used after SAH
(see also Case 33). As with the LI, a high ICA/ICA index
indicates a more severe stenosis (Alexandrov 2013).
Flow Profi le Alterations—Spectral Broadening: Doppler
spectrum analysis of normal blood fl ow classically reveals
a laminar fl ow characterized by a systolic window, which
means that the highest velocity is in the center of the vessel and the lowest at its wall, best seen in the systolic phase
as an “empty” area below the systolic peak. Turbulent fl ow
is observed when blood starts to form eddy currents. Turbulence starts early but is usually seen as a progressive
d i s a p p e a r a n c e o f t h e s y s t o l i c w i n d o w a t a l o c a l d i a m e t e r
reduction of ~50%. Turbulence may also be present without
pathologic meaning near sharp changes of fl ow direction,
e.g., in vessel bifurcations and loops. Because of their short
lengths and smaller sizes this is more often observed in the
intracranial arteries and especially in the carotid siphon
(Fig. A5.39). Experienced ultrasonographers can also iden-
tify turbulence by hearing a disturbed audio signal. In very
Fig. A5.40 Musical murmurs. (A) TCD Doppler spectrum of a highgrade M1-MCA stenosis (peak systolic fl ow velocity >300 cm/s).
Note the mirror-image parallel strings as the visual correlate of a
musical murmur. (B–D) TCCS Color-mode images and Doppler
spectra: (B) Transtemporal approach, midbrain plane showing
a high-grade P1-PCA stenosis; (C) Transtemporal approach,
midbrain plane demonstrates a functional stenosis at the ACoA;
(D) Transtemporal approach, posterior coronal plane showing a highgrade basilar artery stenosis.
high-grade stenosis a harmonic phenomenon, the so-called
musical murmur, can be observed. Acoustically it resembles
a bird call and is therefore also frequently called the “seagull
cry” or “goose cry.” In the Doppler spectrum, mirror-image
parallel strings or bands can be observed (see Fig. A5.40 and
Video
A5.7). The phenomenon presumably results from
harmonic frequencies, generated from regular vibrations of
the vessel walls caused by the increased blood fl ow veloci-
ties. Musical murmurs are usually observed in intracranial
stenosis. A recent study reporting on 66 musical murmurs
found 94% of murmurs occurring in intracranial vessels and
6% in extracranial vessels (Lin et al 2006). In 88% of cases
a high-grade stenosis was detected. In the remaining cases,
the musical murmur was found mainly in the communicating intracranial arteries. Here the musical murmur indicates
a “functional stenosis,” when blood fl ow is too high for the
size of the ACoA or PCoA. As a rule of thumb it can be postulated that whenever a musical murmur is detected in one
of the communicating arteries, even if the maximal fl ow ve-
locities are not clearly increased, a proximal steno-occlusive
process has to be present.
Spectral broadening and musical murmurs, however,
are additional and not exclusive criteria for stenosis. They
depend on the grade as well as the confi guration of the
stenosis and are not mandatory.
Indirect Hemodynamic Assessment
In any case of a suspected or known stenosis, not only the
intrastenotic fl ow signal but also the waveforms from ves-
sel segments proximal and more importantly distal to a
stenosis (prestenotic and poststenotic fl ow pattern) must
be analyzed. This distinguishes between stenoses with or
without a hemodynamic eff ect (Fig. A5.41 and Fig. A5.42).
If the poststenotic fl ow of an ICA stenosis is not visualized
extracranially, the C6-ICA and OA may be analyzed for validation of its hemodynamic relevance (Fig. A5.43). By defi ni-
tion, stenoses are hemodynamically relevant if they cause a

123Arterial Pathology
Valdueza et al., Neurosonology and Neuroimaging of Stroke: A Comprehensive Reference, Second Edition (ISBN 978-3-13-141872-2), copyright © 2017 Thieme Medical Publishers
All rights reserved. Usage subject to terms and conditions of license.
AT
AT
Fig. A5.41 Left: Contrast-enhanced MRA, coronal MIP showing a severe extracranial hemodynamically relevant high-grade
90% ICA stenosis. Note the signal void at the stenosis and the
collapse of the poststenotic segment of the ICA due to the
drop of pressure and reduced volume fl ow. Right: Extracranial
duplex, longitudinal view. Doppler spectrum analysis in poststenotic ICA, fl ow velocity 26/5 cm/s (top), intrastenotic ICA,
fl ow velocity 360/105 cm/s (middle) and prestenotic CCA, fl ow
v e l o c i t y 3 8 / 1 2 c m / s ( bottom). Note the increased pulsatility
in the prestenotic CCA and the distinctly delayed systolic fl ow
a c c e l e r a t i o n i n t h e p o s t s t e n o t i c I C A .
A
B
Fig. A5.42 Extracranial duplex of a hemodynamically relevant ICA
stenosis. Longitudinal view, color-mode image, and Doppler spectrum analysis. Top: Shortly after the stenosis (arrow) a serrated fl ow
signal indicates relevance of the stenosis. The acceleration time
(AT) is normal: 50 milliseconds. Bottom: Insonation further distal
reveals an obvious poststenotic fl ow pattern with prolonged AT
(120 milliseconds). For further reading on the AT see below.
A
B
C
C
D
Fig. A5.43 (A) Extracranial duplex, longitudinal view. Doppler
spectrum analysis showing a proximal ICA stenosis (fl ow velocity:
414/181 cm/s). (B) TCCS, color-mode image and corresponding
Doppler spectrum analysis, transtemporal axial insonation, lower
pontine plane. Poststenotic fl ow pattern and reduced fl ow velocity
in the C6-ICA (24/13 cm/s). (C) TCCS, transorbital approach, colormode image and corresponding Doppler spectrum analysis reveal-
Fig. A5.44 Flow pattern distal to a hemodynamically relevant
VA ste nosi s. ( A) Increased fl ow velocity in a distal V1-VA stenosis
(257/46 cm/s). (B) Turbulent fl ow in the proximal V2-VA between
C5 and C6 (69/17 cm/s). (C) Mild poststenotic fl ow pattern in the
mid V2-VA between C3 and C4 (108/34 cm/s, AT 136 milliseconds).
(D) Apparent poststenotic fl ow pattern in V3-VA (53/23 cm/s, AT
200 milliseconds).
ing an OA fl ow signal similar to C6-ICA (15/6 cm/s).

124 5 Vascular Pathology
Valdueza et al., Neurosonology and Neuroimaging of Stroke: A Comprehensive Reference, Second Edition (ISBN 978-3-13-141872-2), copyright © 2017 Thieme Medical Publishers
All rights reserved. Usage subject to terms and conditions of license.
1
2
3
4
5
Fig. A5.45 TCCS, Doppler spectrum analysis of normal M1-MCA
(1) and moderate (2,3) to severe (4) and pseudo-venous (5) poststenotic fl ow pattern.
reduced blood volume fl ow and poststenotic pressure drop.
According to the Spencer’s curve discussed earlier, this occurs if the diameter is decreased by more than 70–80% or
the cross-sectional area is reduced by 90–95%. Archie and
Feldtman (1981) found similar results, suggesting that relevant blood fl ow reduction of 40% begins at 75% diameter
stenosis or 94% area stenosis. Considering waveform appearance together with fl ow velocities will therefore help to
recognize a hemodynamically relevant stenosis.
Note that the terminology for pre- and poststenotic
fl ow signals is not well standardized. In this book, we use
the terms pre- and poststenotic fl ow pattern for detecta-
ble proximal or distal fl ow signal alterations in stenoses
and occlusions.
The prestenotic fl ow pattern comprises a mostly nor-
mal systolic fl ow velocity and always a normal rise in
systolic fl ow. However, distal fl ow obstruction leads to
raised peripheral resistance, reduced prestenotic diastolic fl ow, and subsequently raised pulsatility. In cases with
an unclear cause of the distal fl ow obstruction (occlusion
or stenosis) but highly pulsatile fl ow signals, the term
“high-resistance fl ow pattern with increased pulsatility”
might be more appropriate.
A poststenotic fl ow pattern requires a relevant proximal
obstruction of at least 70–80%, which then leads to the phenomenon of delayed systolic acceleration. For assessment of
a poststenotic fl ow pattern, the insonation has to be per-
formed at a certain distance from the stenosis to avoid signal artifacts caused by severe turbulence. The poststenotic
fl ow may also become more obvious in the run of a vessel
with a long course. This can also be observed in proximal
VA st en os es w he n t he V 2 s eg m en t r ev ea ls no o bv io us d elayed systolic increase, but this becomes evident in its V3
or V4 segments (Fig. A5.44). A reduced blood fl ow results
in a compensatory dilatation of the resistance vessels to
avoid downstream hypoperfusion. As a consequence the total arterial cross-sectional area increases, with subsequent
reduction of the peripheral resistance causing a raised diastolic fl ow component and reduced pulsatility. For these
Fig. A5.46 TCCS, Doppler spectrum analysis of normal M1-MCA
and M1-MCA of a patient with an ipsilateral ICA occlusion revealing typical signs of a poststenotic fl ow pattern. Top: Reduced blood
fl ow velocity 42/24 cm/s versus 137/44 cm/s. Middle: Prolonged
acceleration time (AT) 120 milliseconds versus 56 milliseconds.
Bottom: Reduced pulsatility index (PI 0.59 versus 0.88).
fl ow patterns, terms such as “blunted fl ow,” “low-resistance
fl ow,” “tardus parvus waveform” or, in case of distinct al-
terations, “venous-like fl ow” can be used (Fig. A5.45). The
delayed systolic acceleration (delayed upstroke/upslope) as
integral part of the poststenotic fl ow pattern can be quan-
tifi ed by the acceleration time (AT), measured from the
onset of systole to the fi rst peak systole. The AT is widely
used in renal artery stenosis to diagnose hemodynamically signifi cant diseases, with 70 ms generally considered as
the cut-off . An AT of >100 ms has a sensitivity of 32% and a
specifi city of 100% in diagnosing a hemodynamically rele-
vant renal stenosis (Motew et al 2000). AT analysis may also
be of interest in neurosonology, but here its use is not yet
well established. In clinical practice a visual comparison of
homologous vessel segments appears to be adequate.
Besides delayed systolic fl ow acceleration and a con-
comitantly increased diastolic fl ow, reduced fl ow velocities
are usually present as signs of a hemodynamically compromised poststenotic fl ow (
Fig. A5.46). R
educed or nor
mal
fl ow velocities help to distinguish real poststenotic fl ow
from similar patterns which may be seen in hyperperfused
vessels like feeders of dural arteriovenous fi stulas and ar-
teriovenous malformations (AVMs) or otherwise normal
vessels that serve as collaterals in major vessel occlusions
(see Fig. A5.35). General low-resistance fl ow patterns in all
brain-supplying arteries may be also seen in severe aortic
valve stenosis.
To obtain the greatest diagnostic certainty in everyday
clinical practice, we recommend that signals in an assumed
stenosis should be obtained from all three vessel segments
(prestenotic, intrastenotic, and poststenotic) whenever possible. The above criteria are of special signifi cance
when performing serial measurements over long periods
to detect disease progression. For instance, if initially absent indirect hemodynamic criteria develop over time, an
increase of the stenosis to a range of at least 80% is likely.
Assessment of only intrastenotic fl ow velocities alone is
problematic, as velocities may even decrease with increasing grade of stenosis (see the Spencer’s curve, Fig. A5.34).

ICA
Valdueza et al., Neurosonology and Neuroimaging of Stroke: A Comprehensive Reference, Second Edition (ISBN 978-3-13-141872-2), copyright © 2017 Thieme Medical Publishers
All rights reserved. Usage subject to terms and conditions of license.
125Arterial Pathology
ECA
Fig. A5.47 Left: Contrast-enhanced MRA, coronal MIP showing an
ICA stenosis. The ICA was considered to reveal only wall irregularities.
Top r igh t: Extracranial duplex, color-mode image, cross-sectional
plane: Area reduction according to a 65% stenosis (left), diameter
reduction according to a 50% stenosis (right). Bottom right: Color-
mode image and corresponding Doppler spectrum analysis revealing
a nonturbulent fl ow with normal velocities of 72/22 cm/s.
Ultrasound Criteria of Occlusions
Direct Morphologic Assessment
Extracranial B-mode duplex ultrasound may reveal complete fi lling of the vessel lumen with thrombotic material
of varying echogenicity (see Video
A5.8). In chronic
occlusion, precise vessel identifi cation and diff erentiation
of the vessel lumen might be diffi cult. A fresh thrombotic
occlusion usually presents with hypoechoic thrombotic
material. In contrast to a recent occlusion, a chronic occlusion may demonstrate a reduction or loss of vessel distensibility which defi nes variation of diameter during the
systolic and diastolic phase (Alexandrov 2013). B-mode
insonation alone, however, is not suffi cient for diagnosis
of occlusion. It should always be combined with colormode and Doppler spectrum analysis.
Direct Hemodynamic Assessment
Occlusions result in a complete absence of color-fl ow
signal, even after adjustment for very low fl ow signals
(lowest PRF and increased color gain settings). Doppler
spectrum analysis reveals no fl ow signal. In cases with a
proximal vessel stump, a distinctly reduced, alternating
fl ow pattern with a short systolic peak and a small retrograde fl ow component (“stump signal” or “to-and-fro
signal”) can be found. Diagnostic certainty may be increased by using intravenously administered ultrasound
contrast agents. On transcranial insonation, a missing
fl ow signal does not necessarily imply occlusion. For example, the P1-PCA segment might be absent due to P1
hypo- or aplasia in case of a fetal-type PCA. The A1-ACA
segment might also be missing in distinct hypo- or aplasia. In these circumstances, indirect hemodynamic criteria might help to distinguish normal anatomic variants
from pathologic fi ndings.
Fig. A5.48 Distal ICA stenosis. Color-mode, longitudinal plane,
composed image. Aliasing and lumen reduction is visible ~2 cm
distal of the ICA bifurcation (arrow) indicating ICA stenosis. Doppler spectrum reveals increased velocities (top left: 265/87 cm/s).
The proximal ICA itself showed low velocities (bottom right:
18/6 cm/s).
fl ow profi les proximal and distal to the occlusion (see also
“Ultrasound Criteria of Stenoses” above). Because of the
ability of collateral vessels to bypass occlusions, their detection and consideration of their capacity is of paramount
importance in the acute and chronic state after stroke (for
further details see also “Collateral Pathways” below).
Extracranial Pathology
Extracranial Anterior Circulation
ICA Stenosis
Auscultation with the stethoscope can be considered as
an inadequate screening method as it detects only 25% of
ICA stenoses and has a high number of false-positive fi nd-
ings: 10% are not confi rmed by conventional angiography
(Ziegler et al 1971).
Since a variety of alternative invasive, less invasive, and
noninvasive imaging methods are available that permit visualization of vessel pathology in vivo, the evaluation of ICA
pathology and grading of ICA stenosis has been and remains
a matter of extensive debate. A special anatomic variant of
the ICA which hinders a simple interpretation of stenoses in
each modality, unlike other brain-supplying arteries, is the
variable widening of the carotid bulb. ICA stenoses of atherosclerotic origin are mainly located just at this site, which is
explained by the nonlinear fl ow at the bifurcation. In meth-
ods primarily outlining the intraluminal patency a relevant
bulb stenosis may be underestimated. In particular, homogeneous noncalcifi ed plaques may have a smooth surface and
may be completely overlooked in catheter or MR angiography (Fig. A5.47). Precise analysis of vessel lumen reduction
within this region is therefore a challenge for all currently
available imaging methods. ICA dissections usually alter the
ICA in its more distal parts but atherosclerotic lesions may
also aff ect the ICA at more atypical distal sites (Fig. A5.48).
Indirect Hemodynamic Assessment
In occlusion, the same criteria as for hemodynamically relevant high-grade stenoses can be applied for the analysis of
Grading of ICA Stenosis by Digital Subtraction Angiography
Evaluation of stenoses and occlusions has so far been

126 5 Vascular Pathology
Valdueza et al., Neurosonology and Neuroimaging of Stroke: A Comprehensive Reference, Second Edition (ISBN 978-3-13-141872-2), copyright © 2017 Thieme Medical Publishers
All rights reserved. Usage subject to terms and conditions of license.
ICAECA
D
C
B
A
CCA
Fig. A5.49 Schematic of an ICA stenosis, similar to the images
derived from DSA. Illustration of three angiographic methods to
determine the grade of ICA stenosis. Note that the ECST method
uses an “eyeball” estimate of the nonvisible outer wall of the ICA
at the carotid bulb (dashed gray line). Comparative analysis of the
three methods yielded a linear relationship, allowing an estimated
conversion.
NASCET
(D – B) / D x 100%
ECST
(C – B) / C x 100%
CC
(A – B) / A x 100%
Conversion
NASCET (%) =
(ECST – 40%) / 0.6
(CC – 40%) / 0.6%
dominated by the fi rst available method: conventional
angiography. Several important clinical trials have been
based on angiographic data, the results of which form the
basis for current treatment decisions in carotid stenosis. The
European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST Collaborative Group
1991) and the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET Collaborators 1991) compared
medical treatment and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in
patients with diff erent grades of symptomatic ICA stenosis.
They found that patients with stenoses between 70% and
95% signifi cantly benefi t from the surgical intervention.
However, the two studies used diff erent approaches to de-
termine the grade of stenosis. The NASCET study used the
diameter of the unaff ected distal ICA and the narrowest
stenosis diameter for calculation of stenosis (distal grade of
stenosis). The ECST used the stenosis diameter and the estimated diameter of the nonvisualized outer walls of the ICA
stenosis (local grade of stenosis). A third method, defi ning
the grade of stenosis between the stenosis diameter and the
proximal unaff ected CCA (CC method) has not yet been used
in a large clinical trial (de Bray and Glatt 1995) (Fig. A5.49).
Currently treatment decisions on whether or not to perform
CEA rely on the NASCET and ECST data. Although numerically identical, a 70% NASCET ICA stenosis is not equal to a
70% ECST ICA stenosis. Rothwell and co workers compared
NASCET and ECST grades of stenosis and found a linear correlation which allows an estimated conversion between the
two approaches (Rothwell et al 1994):
NASCET (%) = (ECST − 40%)/0.6
The same relationship can be applied to the CC criteria:
NASCET (%) = (CC − 40%)/0.6
CBA
Fig. A5.50 DSA, selective CCA injection, lateral view. (A–C) Po-
tential error in ICA stenosis estimation using the ECST method.
Diff erent estimates of the presumed carotid sinus will result in a
calculated grade of stenosis increasing from A to C. Diameter of
stenosis: 3.3 mm. Diameter of the carotid bulb, assessed by duplex
ultrasound: 9.2 mm. Resulting degree of stenosis: 64%, best corresponding to the estimate in C.
(Al exa nd rov et a l 199 3) . The N AS CET a ppro ach i s una ble to
account for low-grade stenosis as a 40% ECST stenosis equals
0% NASCET, and, for example, a 30% ECST stenosis translates
to an absurd –17% NASCET stenosis. The ECST approach,
on the other hand, relies on an “eyeball” estimation of the
presumed carotid bulb diameter, which has the potential for
considerable error (Fig. A5.50 and Fig. A5.51). To reduce this
error some authors use the carotid stenosis index, which is
largely based on a publication by Williams and Nicolaides,
who found a fi xed carotid bulb to proximal CCA ratio of 1.2
in 96% of 61 angiograms of presumably normal carotid bifurcations (Williams and Nicolaides 1987). Use of this ratio
certainly improved the comparability between both angiographic methods but did not improve their diagnostic accuracy. In fact other studies found an ICA/CCA ratio ranging
from 0.7 to 1.4 (Rothwell et al 1994). A CTA approach has
questioned a fi xed ICA/CCA ratio (Bartlett et al 2007).
Considering these shortcomings, it is surprising that
DSA has so far remained the diagnostic gold standard
with which all other methods have to compete. The relevance of extended meta-analyses which try to analyze
sensitivity and specifi city values for the less invasive
methods (duplex ultrasound, MRA, CTA) in comparison to
DSA (Patel et al 2002, Wardlaw et al 2006a) is also questionable. As with all other nonangiographic methods,
the duplex ultrasound fi ndings have to be “imported”
into the angio graphic scales. Continuous-wave Doppler
sonography, in contrast, can no longer be recommended
because of its low diagnostic accuracy. For instance, in a
comparative Doppler and angiographic study that aimed
to identify patients with ICA stenoses >60% (NASCET criteria), the Doppler technique yielded 41% false-positive
results (Qureshi et al 2001). For further details, see Case 1.
Following this conversion, a 70% ECST ICA stenosis is equivalent to a 50% NASCET stenosis. Despite this correlation and
the positive fi ndings in the above two clinical studies, both
approaches have considerable methodological problems
Grading of ICA Stenosis by Duplex Ultrasonography
Duplex ultrasonography allows the grading of ICA stenosis
according to the ECST or NASCET criteria, so ultrasound reports should always specify the classifi cation system used.

127Arterial Pathology
Valdueza et al., Neurosonology and Neuroimaging of Stroke: A Comprehensive Reference, Second Edition (ISBN 978-3-13-141872-2), copyright © 2017 Thieme Medical Publishers
All rights reserved. Usage subject to terms and conditions of license.
ICA
ECA
Fig. A5.51 Extracranial duplex corresponding to the DSA in Fig. A5.50.
(A) B-mode image, longitudinal plane: Large, mildly hypoechoic
structure in the carotid bulb as well as at the ECA origin. (B) Color-
mode, cross-sectional plane: Following the ECST criteria, the diameter
of the vessel (9.2 mm) and the residual lumen (3.3 mm) are assessed,
resulting in a 64% stenosis. (C) Color-mode, longitudinal plane: Clear
delineation of the remaining perfused lumen and confi rmation of
the plaque extension. (D) Doppler spectrum analysis. Flow velocity
185/102 cm/s, indicating local stenosis, grade 60–70%.
BA
ICA
ECA
DC
The ultrasound technique works at its best if the local
grade of stenosis is assessed, i.e., if the ECST grades are
measured by direct analysis of cross-sectional area or lumen reduction. The most confi dent results can be achieved
in low and moderate stenoses with up to 50% lumen reduction (Fig. A5.52). The distal ICA lumen, required for
NASCET grading, is usually diffi cult to assess. However, the
NASCET criteria have become the current base for clinical
decision-making worldwide. The Neurosonology Research
Group of the World Federation of Neurology (NSRG) has
therefore proposed adapted duplex criteria, which are able
to defi ne stenoses according to the NASCET system by us-
ing a multiparametric approach (von Reutern et al 2012).
With increasing grade of stenosis there is a shift of importance from B-mode imaging to velocity measurements and
fi nally hemodynamic parameters. To achieve this goal, all
morphologic as well as direct (fl ow velocities) and indirect
hemodynamic information (collateral fl ow, poststenotic
fl ow pattern) needs to be considered by also including orbital and intracranial fl ow parameters. In the following, we
present our recommendations for the grading of ICA stenoses which are mainly based on the NSRG criteria.
B-mode and color-mode imaging, especially in the
cross-sectional plane, are the most important parameters
in low-grade bulb stenoses <50% as usually no obvious
velocity increase is present (see Fig. A5.11). Here we rec-
ommend describing the lumen reduction in local grades
and to start diagnosing a stenosis from a 30% narrowing
onwards, stepwise in 10% steps up to a 50% stenosis. The
calculated stenosis according to the NASCET criteria may
additionally be reported. In a local stenosis between 50%
and 60% (NASCET 15–35%), the main criterion is a velocity increase without indirect signs of collateral fl ow or of
poststenotic fl ow pattern. In local stenoses of more than
80% (NASCET 70%), indirect hemodynamic criteria are the
dominant parameters demonstrating a collateral fl ow via
alternative pathways (retrograde ophthalmic fl ow, cross-
BA
ECA ECA
pICA
DC
dICA dICA
Fig. A5.52 Extracranial duplex, color-mode image, cross-sectional
plane, ICA bulb stenosis. (A,B) ICA bulb with a diameter reduction
from 10.8 mm to 4.6 mm leading to a 57% local stenosis (A) and an
area reduction from 32.7 mm
stenosis (B). (C,D) Distal ICA on the same side with a diameter of
6 mm and an area of 28.9 mm
NASCET of 23%.
2
to 15.9 mm2 which results in a 51%
2
resulting in a stenosis according to
pICA
fl ow via ACoA or PCoA or leptomeningeal collateral fl ow),
and/or a poststenotic fl ow pattern characterized by a pro-
longed AT and/or decreased pulsatility index (PI) in the
distal ICA, and/or a prestenotic fl ow pattern in the CCA
with increased pulsatility. A comparison with the unaff ect-
ed side by eyeball estimate is necessary to prove a pre- or
poststenotic fl ow pattern. The ICA/CCA, ICA
or ICA
lateral
ond-line criteria. However, these are less frequently used
intrastenotic
/ICA
indices may be useful as sec-
poststenotic
ipsilateral
/ICA
contra-
in our daily routine and their importance should not be
overestimated. This means, in case of confl icting fi ndings,
fi rst-line criteria (one or more signs of a hemodynamic
compromise, such as collaterals or a poststenotic fl ow pat-
tern) overrule second-line criteria such as the above-mentioned ratios. If a collateral fl ow is clearly documented, a
hemodynamically relevant stenosis is proven irrespective
of the measured intrastenotic fl ow velocity.
For exact grading, the highest velocity within a stenosis should be identifi ed. Depending on the confi guration
of the stenosis this point can be at its origin (most frequent location) but also more distal, as often seen in case
of dissections. In most cases a direct assessment of the
highest velocities is possible; however, evaluation may be
hindered or may even be impossible if severe plaque calcifi cation and subsequent acoustic shadowing are pres-
ent. The latter is found in up to 7% of cases (Polak et al
1989) (Fig. A5.53). A deeply located vessel or an angulated
vessel course may also impair the visualization of a stenosis. Velocity measurements should be performed with
the lowest possible angle of correction (see also Chapter
1, “Doppler Shift and Flow Velocity” under “Ultrasound
Principles”), following the jet of the fl ow and not the ana-
tomic course of the aff ected vessel (Fig. A5.54). If present,
prestenotic fl ow alterations in the distal CCA are easily
detectable (Fig. A5.55). Extracranial measurements distal to the stenosis are often hindered if the bifurcation
is near the mandible or if the stenosis extends over a

128 5 Vascular Pathology
Valdueza et al., Neurosonology and Neuroimaging of Stroke: A Comprehensive Reference, Second Edition (ISBN 978-3-13-141872-2), copyright © 2017 Thieme Medical Publishers
All rights reserved. Usage subject to terms and conditions of license.
A
B
Fig. A5.53 Extracranial duplex, color-mode image, longitudinal
view. (A,B) Examples of a distinct acoustic shadowing phenomenon
caused by calcifi ed ICA plaques impeding assessment of ICA fl ow.
Shortly distally a fl ow signal can be detected (B).
long segment distance. In some of these cases, the distal
extra cranial ICA can be assessed in the axial plane. Unfortunately in this plane the angle of insonation is not well
defi ned and reliable velocity measurement cannot be
performed. However, spectrum analysis may still be suffi cient to identify a poststenotic fl ow pattern and some-
times there are also perivascular color artifacts, mainly
during systole, surrounding the stenotic vessel (the “confetti eff ect;” see also Fig. A1.45). Alternatively, the fl ow
pattern of the intracranial ICA below the communicating
arteries, preferably at the C6-ICA segment (Fig. A5.56,
top), or the OA if anterograde and not activated as a collateral vessel itself (Fig. A5.57) may show a poststenotic fl ow pattern, illustrating the hemo dynamic relevance
of an extracranial ICA stenosis. The ipsilateral MCA and
ACA may also be analyzed. However, in their assessment
it has to be considered that collateral fi lling might have
already occurred via ACoA, PCoA, and/or OA, and the observed MCA and ACA waveforms might no longer reveal
the poststenotic ICA fl ow pattern (Fig. A5.56, bottom). In
the case of a collateral fl ow via the PCoA, the ACA might
show a more distinct poststenotic fl ow pattern compared
with the MCA which can be best explained by a functioning ACoA and a patent contralateral A1-ACA ensuring fl ow to both ACA territories (Fig. A5.58). A synopsis
of recommended duplex ultrasound criteria for grading
of a proximal ICA stenosis considering the multiparametric approach of morphology, direct and indirect fl ow
parameters based on the NSRG criteria (von Reutern et
al 2012) is given in Fig. A5.59. Particularly important are
the threshold values which defi ne an ICA stenosis >50%
according to the NASCET criteria. The NSRG recommended using the relatively low USA threshold values (see below). However, they also added an analysis of data from
fi ve DSA-correlated studies including 977 stenoses, which
together revealed higher average peak systolic fl ow ve-
locities. Interestingly, the latter are closely equivalent to
the threshold values usually used in European countries.
BA
Fig. A5.54 Extracranial duplex, color-mode image, longitudinal
plane. Image of a high-grade ICA stenosis with lumen reduction
and color-aliasing at the stenosis. Direction of the fl ow stream
(“jet”) and vessel course is not equivalent, complicating the
e x a c t p l a c e m e n t o f t h e a n g l e c o r r e c t i o n . ( A) Inappropriate angle
correction placement following the vessel course (398/197 cm/s).
(B) Preferred placement following the fl ow jet within the stenosis
resulting in a diff erent velocity (270/128 cm/s).
Fig. A5.55 Assessment of pre- and poststenotic blood fl ow in the
CCA, proximal ICA, and distal ICA. Left: Dop pler sp ect ra in unaff ect-
ed vessels. Right: Flow patterns in a >80% ICA stenosis (ECST criteria): Prestenotic fl ow pattern in the CCA with reduced fl ow velocity
and increased pulsatility (bottom), intrastenotic elevated fl ow ve-
locity and spectral broadening (middle), poststenotic fl ow pattern
in the distal ICA with reduced fl ow velocity, pulsatility and delayed
systolic fl ow acceleration (top). Note the distal ICA collapse.
It seems therefore more reasonable to use these average
velocities as threshold values for grading of ICA stenosis
in addition to the indispensable indirect hemodynamic
marker. The 90% grade according to NASCET (95% according to ECST) represents the specifi c fi ndings in near-oc-
clusion. Ultrasound reports should always state the classifi cation system used. This approach, including a grading
in 10% steps, is used in many European centers and is well
accepted as it has been shown to be a reliable approach if
applied by experienced sonographers (Dippel et al 1997).
In North America the intracranial and intraorbital fl ow
parameters are normally not analyzed and therefore the
grading of ICA stenosis is mainly based on intrastenotic
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
