Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5776_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
53 Мб
Скачать
119Arterial Pathology
Area reduction [%]
96846436
600
500
400
300
200
100
Blood volume flow (mL/min)
0 0
Diameter reduction [%]
Fig. A5.34 Mathematical fl ow model in ICA stenosis (Spencer’s curve). Theoretical relationship of stenosis grade (assessed by di­ameter and area measurements) and systolic blood fl ow velocity (blue line) within the stenosis. In very high-grade stenosis velocity values drop, and they further decrease in near-occlusion. Note the blood volume fl ow (red line) values remain constant until a 70–80% diameter reduction, defi ning the start of a hemodynamic relevant stenosis. (Adapted from Spencer and Reid 1979.)
300
200
Flow velocity (cm/s)
100
100806040200
in the region with maximal lumen reduction from the in­ner border zone of the wall. The grade of stenosis is calcu­lated from the relation of the total vessel diameter (D and the minimal stenosis diameter:
Grade (%) = D
stenosis/Dtotal
× 100
total
Area: Unlike DSA but similar to CTA and (with some re­strictions) to MRI, duplex ultrasound allows measure­ment and calculation of the grade of stenosis from the vessel’s cross-sectional area, a parameter which correlates best with results derived from postoperative histologic planimetric analysis (Alexandrov et al 1993, Eckstein et al
2001). It is the true relevant anatomic parameter for the measured fl ow velocities according to the physics of fl ow. Area measurement is also independent of the morpho­logical confi guration of the stenosis, while the diameter approach only measures correctly in the case of a cylin­drical stenosis. The grade of stenosis is calculated from the relation of the total vessel area (A stenosis diameter (A
Grade (%) = A
stenosis
):
stenosis/Atotal
) and the minimal
total
× 100
Examples of both diameter and area measurements are given in Fig. A5.32. Although assessed in exactly the same vessel segment, the two methods yield diff erent results. The diameter calculation (D in a 62% stenosis, the area calculation (A
= 10.1 mm2) in 81% stenosis. This phenomenon can
A
stenosis
also be described mathematically (Fig. A5.33). Depending
= 9 mm, D
total
= 3.4 mm) results
stenosis
= 52.4 mm2,
total
on the type of stenosis (axisymmetric or asymmetric) the nonlinear relation between area and diameter varies in favor of diameter or area (Spencer and Reid 1979). Up to now all
major clinical trials with catheter angiography as the main method have used the diameter approach, so it will current­ly continue to be the preferred method of assessment. In the future, however, the area method recommended for duplex sonography in the 1990s (de Bray and Glatt 1995) will prob­ably gain importance, particularly considering the increas­ing use of the CTA technique, with which it is also possible to perform exact planimetric cross-sectional measurements (Bartlett et al 2007).
Direct Hemodynamic Assessment
Hemodynamic eff ects can be observed using the color mode of the ultrasound system. The color signal not only reveals the regions with preserved fl ow but also gives in- formation about fl ow direction (antegrade or retrograde ow). Furthermore, a color-aliasing phenomenon may in­dicate the presence of raised fl ow velocities, such as those caused by a stenosis of at least medium grade. However, the main source of hemodynamic information is provid­ed by the Doppler spectrum analysis, from which several parameters can be derived.
Blood Flow Velocity: Blood fl ow velocity values, i.e., the maximal systolic velocity (also referred to as peak veloci­ty), maximal end-diastolic fl ow velocity, or the mean fl ow velocity, are derived from the Doppler spectrum (for fur­ther details see Chapter 3, “Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity”).
)
Their assessment may reveal normal, raised, or reduced values. Vessel narrowing is directly correlated with in­creased fl ow velocities but this relation is not linear over the whole range of stenosis grades. In very high-grade stenosis and near-occlusion, fl ow velocity drops to normal or below normal values, as demonstrated in the Spencer’s curve (Fig. A5.34). According to this curve, which was developed to describe fl ow properties in a straight vessel without bifurcation and an axisymmetric stenosis, the in­itial increase in fl ow velocity compensates the lumen re- duction to maintain a constant blood fl ow volume. With a stenosis of 70% (which correspond to an area reduction of 90%) or more, the blood fl ow volume drops despite a fur- ther increase of fl ow velocity. When the stenosis reaches ~85% the blood fl ow velocity also starts to fall. The same velocity may therefore be seen in a 60% stenosis as in a 90% stenosis (rising or falling shoulder of the curve). To assess the grade of stenosis correctly it is crucial to consider the pre- and poststenotic waveforms as well as the presence of collateral vessel activation. These indirect signs are of par­amount importance for confi dent grading of stenoses. Note that the defi nition of a hemodynamically relevant stenosis refers to the decreased blood volume fl ow and not to an increased blood fl ow velocity; this term should therefore be used only for a stenosis of at least 70–80%.
The Spencer’s curve was mainly developed to predict arterial hemodynamics in a proximal ICA stenosis, and has several limitations. For instance, it applies to short and a x i s y m m e t r i c c o n c e n t r i c s t e n o s e s , w h e r e a s p a t i e n t s w i t h macroangiopathic lesions usually reveal irregular, eccen­tric stenoses of diff ering lengths. Atherosclerotic stenoses are usually short compared with stenoses caused by vessel dissection or arteritis. Long-segmented stenoses will be underestimated as high fl ow velocities are usually missed
120 5 Vascular Pathology
Fig. A5.35 Increased ow in the VAs in bilateral ICA occlusion. Left: Ce-MRA, anterior MIP, showing bilateral ICA occlusion (ar-
rowheads) and a bilaterally pronounced VA signal (arrows). Right: Duplex sonography, longitudinal plane, color-mode image and corresponding Doppler spectrum analysis: Turbulent fl ow and in- creased fl ow velocities in the right V2-VA, diameter 3.9 mm, fl ow velocity 93/44 cm/s (top) and in the left V2-VA, diameter 4.1 mm, ow velocity 108/48 cm/s (bottom). Identical fl ow patterns were observed in the intracranial VAs and BA. Note, the mild poststen­otic and turbulent fl ow aspect results from the increased VA fl ow.
in such conditions. Also, Spencer’s model implies straight vessel walls resembling a channel: However, the major site of stenotic lesions in extracranial brain-supplying vessels is the proximal ICA which has a physiologic proximal widen­ing, the carotid bulb. The carotid bulb is rarely absent but has a highly variable diameter ranging from normal to pseu­do-aneurysmatic dilation doubling the normal ICA diameter (see also Chapter 2, “Extracranial Arterial Anatomy” under “General Arterial Anatomy”). Because of this physiologic di­lation a nonlaminar fl ow, even with partly retrograde fl ow components, is the usual duplex ultrasound appearance and should not be misinterpreted. A bulb stenosis of ~30% may therefore not reduce the intraluminal diameter compared with that of the distal ICA segment and may even “normal­ize” the fl ow signal by showing fl ow that is now laminar. A 50% stenosis would also not alter waveform and velocities and a local 80% stenosis might not lead to any hemodynamic compromise. The carotid bulb therefore makes interpreta­tion of velocity data somehow diffi cult. The good news is that all the other brain-supplying vessels follow the predic­tion of the Spencer’s curve better, as they normally do not have a bulb equivalent. According to the model a 50% steno­sis should double blood fl ow velocities and a 70% stenosis should lead to a fourfold increase in velocity. Despite these and other shortcomings, sonographers should use the Spen­cer’s curve as the basic tool to understand hemodynamics and the consequences of brain-supplying artery stenosis.
It is important to know that raised fl ow velocities are not limited to lumen reductions. For example, a global velocity increase may be observed in hemodilution and anemia to compensate for the loss of oxygen transport­ers, or in increased blood volume fl ow (hyperperfusion) which may be seen in the early phase following severe head trauma, in the subacute phase after subarachnoid hemorrhage, or in general hypoxia. In all these conditions ow velocities are globally increased. Segmental hyper-
A
Fig. A5.36 Doppler spectra, obtained from follow-up tran­scranial insonation of the MCA in a patient with severe hypoxia. (A) Normal blood fl ow and fl ow velocity. (B) Hyperperfusion—note the increased fl ow velocities as well as the reduced pulsatility. (C) Hypoperfusion—note the reduced fl ow velocity as well as the increased pulsatility resembling an extracranial fl ow signal (“no brain, no fl ow”).
B
C
perfusion and concomitant raised fl ow velocities are ob- served in extra- and intracranial collateral fl ow pathways in steno-occlusive disorders, e.g., in the anterior (ACoA) or posterior (PCoA) communicating arteries or extracranially in the neck vessels in occlusions of other major vessels. For example, in bilateral VA occlusion an increased blood fl ow and a corresponding increase in fl ow velocity is expected in one or both ICAs (see also Case 41). Contrarily and more ev­idently, in bilateral ICA occlusion raised blood fl ow and fl ow velocity may be observed in the extra- and intracranial seg­ments of the VAs and the BA (Fig. A5.35; see also Case 12). Similar fi ndings will be encountered in feeding vessels of ar- teriovenous angiomas or dural fi stulas (see also Case 34 and Case 40). In all these cases the diastolic fl ow velocity will be disproportionately high, indicating a loss of peripheral resistance and dilation of the low-resistance vessels. Con­versely, global low fl ow velocities can be observed if the he- matocrit is high (Brass et al 1988), in severe cardiac output failure, in generalized dilated intracranial vessels—usually in long-standing arterial hypertension—or in the chronic state after severe head trauma or hypoxia. Regional fl ow velocity reductions may indicate hemodynamically relevant occlu­sive processes proximal or distal to the measurement site. All the above-mentioned conditions obviously hinder a sim­ple interpretation of velocity ratios. A sophisticated analysis therefore needs a critical overview of all accessible direct and indirect ultrasound fi ndings. Furthermore, the optimal time for insonation must also be considered. In the fi rst hours of severe global cerebral hypoxia, a distinct reduction of cerebral blood fl ow and consequently of blood fl ow ve- locity occurs. Subsequently a reactive hyperemic phase can be observed, comprising generally increased fl ow velocities as well as reduced pulsatility. If the hypoxia leads to massive brain tissue necrosis, such as in persistent vegetative state, the chronic phase may reveal low fl ow velocities and a high pulsatility similar to the profi les seen in the ECA. A similar
121Arterial Pathology
Fig. A5.37 CCT and TCCS in chronic MCA infarc tion. Left: CCT scan, axial planes showing a residual almost complete territorial MCA infarction. Right: TCCS (transtemporal approach), right-sided insonation, midbrain plane, color-mode image and Doppler spec­trum analysis of the M1-MCA: Reduced fl ow velocity of 58/15 and increased PI of 1.84 in the aff ected side (top) compared with the contralateral M1-MCA (insonated via the same side) with normal ow velocity of 68/28 mm/s and PI of 1.07 (bottom).
phenomenon occurs after large territorial infarctions in the involved arteries (Fig. A5.36, Fig. A5.37, Fig. A5.38).
Blood fl ow velocity measurement in the brain-supplying
arteries crucially depends on the angle of correction as this greatly aff ects the fi nal velocity measurement (for further details see Chapter 1, “Doppler Shift and Flow Velocity” un­der “Ultrasound Principles,” and Chapter 3, “Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity” under “Parameters of Cerebral Hemodynam­ics”). In nonpathologic vessels angle correction should pref­erentially be done parallel to the vessel walls, which usually corresponds to the fl ow stream visualized in the color mode. In a stenosed vessel the fl ow may diff er from the anatomic course of the vessel due to eccentric stenoses. Here, the an­gle should be corrected according to the fl ow stream (also called the “jet”). A Doppler angle greater than 60° should be avoided as it may lead to velocity overestimation. This prob­lem particularly occurs in V2-VA insonation as the vessel course is practically at a 90° angle in relation to the ultra­sound beam, which already causes problems in the color­mode visualization of fl ow. We recommend improving the insonation angle by mild angulation of the probe into the soft neck tissue. Intracranially, nonoptimal insonation an­gles occur during the insonation of the A2-ACA, PCoA, and the transitional zone between the proximal and the distal P2-PCA, as well as during coronal transtemporal insonation of distal ICA and BA.
Velocity Ratios: As discussed earlier, fl ow velocity meas- urements give only surrogate information about blood ow. Under physiologic conditions cerebral blood fl ow and fl ow velocities are well correlated. In pathologic conditions, high velocities may still refl ect normal blood ow (e.g., in nonhemodynamically relevant stenosis), decreased blood fl ow (e.g., in hemodynamically relevant stenosis), and even increased blood fl ow (e.g., in hyper- perfusion). High velocities might even be caused by a mixture of stenosis and hyperperfusion which may be
A
C
Fig. A5.38 MRI and TCCS in complete MCA infarction. (A) 3D TOF­MRA, coronal view, indicating proximal MCA occlusion (arrow). (B) MRI, T2-weighted image, axial view. M1-MCA fl ow void with reduced diameter compared with the contralateral side (arrow) indicating residual fl ow. (C–E) TCCS, transtemporal approach, ax- ial midbrain plane, color-mode and corresponding Doppler spec­tra. (C) Normal PRF and color gain TCCS settings easily depicting the main stems of the contralateral MCA, both ACAs, and PCAs. Ipsilateral proximal MCA vessel sheath is visible within the lateral ssure but M1-MCA is missed (arrow), wrongly suggesting occlu­sion. (D,E) Reduced PRF and increased color gain result in aliasing of color signals (“dirty image”) now showing a proximal MCA color signal (arrow) and a fl ow signal with low fl ow velocities (15/6 cm/s).
B
D
E
observed in the subacute phase after subarachnoid hem­orrhage (SAH) (simultaneous presence of hyperperfusion and vasospasm). In addition to pure velocity measure­ments, velocity ratios comparing homologous vessels on both sides or intra- and prestenotic or intra- and post­stenotic signals on the ipsilateral side may be of help.
ICA/CCA Index: The index is calculated from the max­imal systolic fl ow velocity within the ICA stenosis (V
ICA syst stenosis
within the ipsilateral CCA (V that is independent of general blood fl ow alterations,
) and the maximal systolic fl ow velocity
). It is a parameter
CCA syst
but it only works if the CCA is itself not aff ected by ath- erosclerotic vessel wall changes.
ICA/CCA index = V
ICA syst stenosis/VCCA syst
ICA/ICA Index: The index is calculated from the maximal systolic fl ow velocity within the ICA stenosis (V
ICA syst stenosis
)
122 5 Vascular Pathology
200
150
100
50
BA
DCBA
DC
Fig. A5.39 Top: Schematic of fl ow pattern in a normal and in an in- creasingly stenosed blood vessel. Bottom: Corresponding Doppler spectra: (A) Preserved systolic window in the unaff ected vessel (ar- row); (B) Turbulent fl ow with spectral broadening and disappearing systolic window but still normal velocity; (C) Turbulent fl ow with in- creased velocity indicating a higher grade of stenosis; (D) Severe tur­bulent fl ow with retrograde fl ow components and high fl ow velocity.
and the maximal systolic fl ow velocity of the contra- lateral (unaff ected) ICA (V
ICA/ICA index = V
ICA syst contralateral
ica syst stenosis/VICA syst contralateral
).
It only works if the contralateral ICA shows normal fl ow profi les. Flow velocity measurement should not be per- formed in the carotid bulb but in a straight segment of the unaltered ICA. Because of this limitation the ICA/ ICA index is not commonly used. The angle-corrected intrastenotic fl ow velocities of the ICA may be compared with the fl ow velocities of the distal ICA. To get reliable values the poststenotic fl ow signals should not be dis- turbed and a suffi cient length of the distal ICA must be visualized to use angle correction. This index resembles the Lindegaard Index (LI) which is widely used after SAH (see also Case 33). As with the LI, a high ICA/ICA index indicates a more severe stenosis (Alexandrov 2013).
Flow Pro le Alterations—Spectral Broadening: Doppler spectrum analysis of normal blood fl ow classically reveals a laminar fl ow characterized by a systolic window, which means that the highest velocity is in the center of the ves­sel and the lowest at its wall, best seen in the systolic phase as an “empty” area below the systolic peak. Turbulent fl ow is observed when blood starts to form eddy currents. Tur­bulence starts early but is usually seen as a progressive d i s a p p e a r a n c e o f t h e s y s t o l i c w i n d o w a t a l o c a l d i a m e t e r reduction of ~50%. Turbulence may also be present without pathologic meaning near sharp changes of fl ow direction, e.g., in vessel bifurcations and loops. Because of their short lengths and smaller sizes this is more often observed in the intracranial arteries and especially in the carotid siphon (Fig. A5.39). Experienced ultrasonographers can also iden- tify turbulence by hearing a disturbed audio signal. In very
Fig. A5.40 Musical murmurs. (A) TCD Doppler spectrum of a high­grade M1-MCA stenosis (peak systolic fl ow velocity >300 cm/s). Note the mirror-image parallel strings as the visual correlate of a musical murmur. (B–D) TCCS Color-mode images and Doppler spectra: (B) Transtemporal approach, midbrain plane showing a high-grade P1-PCA stenosis; (C) Transtemporal approach, midbrain plane demonstrates a functional stenosis at the ACoA; (D) Transtemporal approach, posterior coronal plane showing a high­grade basilar artery stenosis.
high-grade stenosis a harmonic phenomenon, the so-called musical murmur, can be observed. Acoustically it resembles a bird call and is therefore also frequently called the “seagull cry” or “goose cry.” In the Doppler spectrum, mirror-image parallel strings or bands can be observed (see Fig. A5.40 and
Video
A5.7). The phenomenon presumably results from
harmonic frequencies, generated from regular vibrations of the vessel walls caused by the increased blood fl ow veloci- ties. Musical murmurs are usually observed in intracranial stenosis. A recent study reporting on 66 musical murmurs found 94% of murmurs occurring in intracranial vessels and 6% in extracranial vessels (Lin et al 2006). In 88% of cases a high-grade stenosis was detected. In the remaining cases, the musical murmur was found mainly in the communicat­ing intracranial arteries. Here the musical murmur indicates a “functional stenosis,” when blood fl ow is too high for the size of the ACoA or PCoA. As a rule of thumb it can be pos­tulated that whenever a musical murmur is detected in one of the communicating arteries, even if the maximal fl ow ve- locities are not clearly increased, a proximal steno-occlusive process has to be present.
Spectral broadening and musical murmurs, however, are additional and not exclusive criteria for stenosis. They depend on the grade as well as the confi guration of the stenosis and are not mandatory.
Indirect Hemodynamic Assessment
In any case of a suspected or known stenosis, not only the intrastenotic fl ow signal but also the waveforms from ves- sel segments proximal and more importantly distal to a stenosis (prestenotic and poststenotic fl ow pattern) must be analyzed. This distinguishes between stenoses with or without a hemodynamic eff ect (Fig. A5.41 and Fig. A5.42). If the poststenotic fl ow of an ICA stenosis is not visualized extracranially, the C6-ICA and OA may be analyzed for vali­dation of its hemodynamic relevance (Fig. A5.43). By defi ni- tion, stenoses are hemodynamically relevant if they cause a
123Arterial Pathology
AT
AT
Fig. A5.41 Left: Contrast-enhanced MRA, coronal MIP show­ing a severe extracranial hemodynamically relevant high-grade 90% ICA stenosis. Note the signal void at the stenosis and the collapse of the poststenotic segment of the ICA due to the drop of pressure and reduced volume fl ow. Right: Extracranial duplex, longitudinal view. Doppler spectrum analysis in post­stenotic ICA, fl ow velocity 26/5 cm/s (top), intrastenotic ICA, ow velocity 360/105 cm/s (middle) and prestenotic CCA, fl ow v e l o c i t y 3 8 / 1 2 c m / s ( bottom). Note the increased pulsatility in the prestenotic CCA and the distinctly delayed systolic fl ow a c c e l e r a t i o n i n t h e p o s t s t e n o t i c I C A .
A
B
Fig. A5.42 Extracranial duplex of a hemodynamically relevant ICA stenosis. Longitudinal view, color-mode image, and Doppler spec­trum analysis. Top: Shortly after the stenosis (arrow) a serrated fl ow signal indicates relevance of the stenosis. The acceleration time (AT) is normal: 50 milliseconds. Bottom: Insonation further distal reveals an obvious poststenotic fl ow pattern with prolonged AT (120 milliseconds). For further reading on the AT see below.
A
B
C
C
D
Fig. A5.43 (A) Extracranial duplex, longitudinal view. Doppler spectrum analysis showing a proximal ICA stenosis (fl ow velocity: 414/181 cm/s). (B) TCCS, color-mode image and corresponding Doppler spectrum analysis, transtemporal axial insonation, lower pontine plane. Poststenotic fl ow pattern and reduced fl ow velocity in the C6-ICA (24/13 cm/s). (C) TCCS, transorbital approach, color­mode image and corresponding Doppler spectrum analysis reveal-
Fig. A5.44 Flow pattern distal to a hemodynamically relevant VA ste nosi s. ( A) Increased fl ow velocity in a distal V1-VA stenosis (257/46 cm/s). (B) Turbulent fl ow in the proximal V2-VA between C5 and C6 (69/17 cm/s). (C) Mild poststenotic fl ow pattern in the mid V2-VA between C3 and C4 (108/34 cm/s, AT 136 milliseconds). (D) Apparent poststenotic fl ow pattern in V3-VA (53/23 cm/s, AT 200 milliseconds).
ing an OA fl ow signal similar to C6-ICA (15/6 cm/s).
124 5 Vascular Pathology
1
2
3
4
5
Fig. A5.45 TCCS, Doppler spectrum analysis of normal M1-MCA (1) and moderate (2,3) to severe (4) and pseudo-venous (5) post­stenotic fl ow pattern.
reduced blood volume fl ow and poststenotic pressure drop. According to the Spencer’s curve discussed earlier, this oc­curs if the diameter is decreased by more than 70–80% or the cross-sectional area is reduced by 90–95%. Archie and Feldtman (1981) found similar results, suggesting that rel­evant blood fl ow reduction of 40% begins at 75% diameter stenosis or 94% area stenosis. Considering waveform ap­pearance together with fl ow velocities will therefore help to recognize a hemodynamically relevant stenosis.
Note that the terminology for pre- and poststenotic ow signals is not well standardized. In this book, we use the terms pre- and poststenotic fl ow pattern for detecta- ble proximal or distal fl ow signal alterations in stenoses and occlusions.
The prestenotic fl ow pattern comprises a mostly nor- mal systolic fl ow velocity and always a normal rise in systolic fl ow. However, distal fl ow obstruction leads to raised peripheral resistance, reduced prestenotic diastol­ic fl ow, and subsequently raised pulsatility. In cases with an unclear cause of the distal fl ow obstruction (occlusion or stenosis) but highly pulsatile fl ow signals, the term “high-resistance fl ow pattern with increased pulsatility” might be more appropriate.
A poststenotic fl ow pattern requires a relevant proximal obstruction of at least 70–80%, which then leads to the phe­nomenon of delayed systolic acceleration. For assessment of a poststenotic fl ow pattern, the insonation has to be per- formed at a certain distance from the stenosis to avoid sig­nal artifacts caused by severe turbulence. The poststenotic ow may also become more obvious in the run of a vessel with a long course. This can also be observed in proximal VA st en os es w he n t he V 2 s eg m en t r ev ea ls no o bv io us d e­layed systolic increase, but this becomes evident in its V3 or V4 segments (Fig. A5.44). A reduced blood fl ow results in a compensatory dilatation of the resistance vessels to avoid downstream hypoperfusion. As a consequence the to­tal arterial cross-sectional area increases, with subsequent reduction of the peripheral resistance causing a raised di­astolic fl ow component and reduced pulsatility. For these
Fig. A5.46 TCCS, Doppler spectrum analysis of normal M1-MCA and M1-MCA of a patient with an ipsilateral ICA occlusion reveal­ing typical signs of a poststenotic fl ow pattern. Top: Reduced blood ow velocity 42/24 cm/s versus 137/44 cm/s. Middle: Prolonged acceleration time (AT) 120 milliseconds versus 56 milliseconds. Bottom: Reduced pulsatility index (PI 0.59 versus 0.88).
ow patterns, terms such as “blunted fl ow,” “low-resistance ow,” “tardus parvus waveform” or, in case of distinct al-
terations, “venous-like fl ow” can be used (Fig. A5.45). The delayed systolic acceleration (delayed upstroke/upslope) as integral part of the poststenotic fl ow pattern can be quan- tifi ed by the acceleration time (AT), measured from the onset of systole to the fi rst peak systole. The AT is widely used in renal artery stenosis to diagnose hemodynamical­ly signifi cant diseases, with 70 ms generally considered as the cut-off . An AT of >100 ms has a sensitivity of 32% and a specifi city of 100% in diagnosing a hemodynamically rele- vant renal stenosis (Motew et al 2000). AT analysis may also be of interest in neurosonology, but here its use is not yet well established. In clinical practice a visual comparison of homologous vessel segments appears to be adequate.
Besides delayed systolic fl ow acceleration and a con- comitantly increased diastolic fl ow, reduced fl ow velocities are usually present as signs of a hemodynamically compro­mised poststenotic fl ow (
Fig. A5.46). R
educed or nor
mal ow velocities help to distinguish real poststenotic fl ow from similar patterns which may be seen in hyperperfused vessels like feeders of dural arteriovenous fi stulas and ar- teriovenous malformations (AVMs) or otherwise normal vessels that serve as collaterals in major vessel occlusions (see Fig. A5.35). General low-resistance fl ow patterns in all brain-supplying arteries may be also seen in severe aortic valve stenosis.
To obtain the greatest diagnostic certainty in everyday clinical practice, we recommend that signals in an assumed stenosis should be obtained from all three vessel segments (prestenotic, intrastenotic, and poststenotic) whenev­er possible. The above criteria are of special signifi cance when performing serial measurements over long periods to detect disease progression. For instance, if initially ab­sent indirect hemodynamic criteria develop over time, an increase of the stenosis to a range of at least 80% is likely. Assessment of only intrastenotic fl ow velocities alone is problematic, as velocities may even decrease with increas­ing grade of stenosis (see the Spencer’s curve, Fig. A5.34).
ICA
125Arterial Pathology
ECA
Fig. A5.47 Left: Contrast-enhanced MRA, coronal MIP showing an ICA stenosis. The ICA was considered to reveal only wall irregularities. Top r igh t: Extracranial duplex, color-mode image, cross-sectional plane: Area reduction according to a 65% stenosis (left), diameter reduction according to a 50% stenosis (right). Bottom right: Color- mode image and corresponding Doppler spectrum analysis revealing a nonturbulent fl ow with normal velocities of 72/22 cm/s.
Ultrasound Criteria of Occlusions
Direct Morphologic Assessment
Extracranial B-mode duplex ultrasound may reveal com­plete fi lling of the vessel lumen with thrombotic material of varying echogenicity (see Video
A5.8). In chronic
occlusion, precise vessel identifi cation and diff erentiation of the vessel lumen might be diffi cult. A fresh thrombotic occlusion usually presents with hypoechoic thrombotic material. In contrast to a recent occlusion, a chronic oc­clusion may demonstrate a reduction or loss of vessel dis­tensibility which defi nes variation of diameter during the systolic and diastolic phase (Alexandrov 2013). B-mode insonation alone, however, is not suffi cient for diagnosis of occlusion. It should always be combined with color­mode and Doppler spectrum analysis.
Direct Hemodynamic Assessment
Occlusions result in a complete absence of color-fl ow signal, even after adjustment for very low fl ow signals (lowest PRF and increased color gain settings). Doppler spectrum analysis reveals no fl ow signal. In cases with a proximal vessel stump, a distinctly reduced, alternating ow pattern with a short systolic peak and a small ret­rograde fl ow component (“stump signal” or “to-and-fro signal”) can be found. Diagnostic certainty may be in­creased by using intravenously administered ultrasound contrast agents. On transcranial insonation, a missing ow signal does not necessarily imply occlusion. For ex­ample, the P1-PCA segment might be absent due to P1 hypo- or aplasia in case of a fetal-type PCA. The A1-ACA segment might also be missing in distinct hypo- or apla­sia. In these circumstances, indirect hemodynamic crite­ria might help to distinguish normal anatomic variants from pathologic fi ndings.
Fig. A5.48 Distal ICA stenosis. Color-mode, longitudinal plane, composed image. Aliasing and lumen reduction is visible ~2 cm distal of the ICA bifurcation (arrow) indicating ICA stenosis. Dop­pler spectrum reveals increased velocities (top left: 265/87 cm/s). The proximal ICA itself showed low velocities (bottom right: 18/6 cm/s).
ow profi les proximal and distal to the occlusion (see also “Ultrasound Criteria of Stenoses” above). Because of the ability of collateral vessels to bypass occlusions, their de­tection and consideration of their capacity is of paramount importance in the acute and chronic state after stroke (for further details see also “Collateral Pathways” below).
Extracranial Pathology
Extracranial Anterior Circulation
ICA Stenosis
Auscultation with the stethoscope can be considered as an inadequate screening method as it detects only 25% of ICA stenoses and has a high number of false-positive fi nd- ings: 10% are not confi rmed by conventional angiography (Ziegler et al 1971).
Since a variety of alternative invasive, less invasive, and noninvasive imaging methods are available that permit vis­ualization of vessel pathology in vivo, the evaluation of ICA pathology and grading of ICA stenosis has been and remains a matter of extensive debate. A special anatomic variant of the ICA which hinders a simple interpretation of stenoses in each modality, unlike other brain-supplying arteries, is the variable widening of the carotid bulb. ICA stenoses of ather­osclerotic origin are mainly located just at this site, which is explained by the nonlinear fl ow at the bifurcation. In meth- ods primarily outlining the intraluminal patency a relevant bulb stenosis may be underestimated. In particular, homoge­neous noncalcifi ed plaques may have a smooth surface and may be completely overlooked in catheter or MR angiogra­phy (Fig. A5.47). Precise analysis of vessel lumen reduction within this region is therefore a challenge for all currently available imaging methods. ICA dissections usually alter the ICA in its more distal parts but atherosclerotic lesions may also aff ect the ICA at more atypical distal sites (Fig. A5.48).
Indirect Hemodynamic Assessment
In occlusion, the same criteria as for hemodynamically rel­evant high-grade stenoses can be applied for the analysis of
Grading of ICA Stenosis by Digital Subtraction Angiography
Evaluation of stenoses and occlusions has so far been
126 5 Vascular Pathology
ICAECA
D
C
B
A
CCA
Fig. A5.49 Schematic of an ICA stenosis, similar to the images derived from DSA. Illustration of three angiographic methods to determine the grade of ICA stenosis. Note that the ECST method uses an “eyeball” estimate of the nonvisible outer wall of the ICA at the carotid bulb (dashed gray line). Comparative analysis of the three methods yielded a linear relationship, allowing an estimated conversion.
NASCET (DB) / D x 100%
ECST (CB) / C x 100%
CC (AB) / A x 100%
Conversion NASCET (%) = (ECST – 40%) / 0.6
(CC – 40%) / 0.6%
dominated by the fi rst available method: conventional angiography. Several important clinical trials have been based on angiographic data, the results of which form the basis for current treatment decisions in carotid stenosis. The European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST Collaborative Group
1991) and the North American Symptomatic Carotid End­arterectomy Trial (NASCET Collaborators 1991) compared medical treatment and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with diff erent grades of symptomatic ICA stenosis. They found that patients with stenoses between 70% and 95% signifi cantly benefi t from the surgical intervention. However, the two studies used diff erent approaches to de- termine the grade of stenosis. The NASCET study used the diameter of the unaff ected distal ICA and the narrowest stenosis diameter for calculation of stenosis (distal grade of stenosis). The ECST used the stenosis diameter and the esti­mated diameter of the nonvisualized outer walls of the ICA stenosis (local grade of stenosis). A third method, defi ning the grade of stenosis between the stenosis diameter and the proximal unaff ected CCA (CC method) has not yet been used in a large clinical trial (de Bray and Glatt 1995) (Fig. A5.49). Currently treatment decisions on whether or not to perform CEA rely on the NASCET and ECST data. Although numeri­cally identical, a 70% NASCET ICA stenosis is not equal to a 70% ECST ICA stenosis. Rothwell and co workers compared NASCET and ECST grades of stenosis and found a linear cor­relation which allows an estimated conversion between the two approaches (Rothwell et al 1994):
NASCET (%) = (ECST 40%)/0.6
The same relationship can be applied to the CC criteria:
NASCET (%) = (CC 40%)/0.6
CBA
Fig. A5.50 DSA, selective CCA injection, lateral view. (A–C) Po- tential error in ICA stenosis estimation using the ECST method. Diff erent estimates of the presumed carotid sinus will result in a calculated grade of stenosis increasing from A to C. Diameter of stenosis: 3.3 mm. Diameter of the carotid bulb, assessed by duplex ultrasound: 9.2 mm. Resulting degree of stenosis: 64%, best corre­sponding to the estimate in C.
(Al exa nd rov et a l 199 3) . The N AS CET a ppro ach i s una ble to account for low-grade stenosis as a 40% ECST stenosis equals 0% NASCET, and, for example, a 30% ECST stenosis translates to an absurd –17% NASCET stenosis. The ECST approach, on the other hand, relies on an “eyeball” estimation of the presumed carotid bulb diameter, which has the potential for considerable error (Fig. A5.50 and Fig. A5.51). To reduce this error some authors use the carotid stenosis index, which is largely based on a publication by Williams and Nicolaides, who found a fi xed carotid bulb to proximal CCA ratio of 1.2 in 96% of 61 angiograms of presumably normal carotid bi­furcations (Williams and Nicolaides 1987). Use of this ratio certainly improved the comparability between both angio­graphic methods but did not improve their diagnostic ac­curacy. In fact other studies found an ICA/CCA ratio ranging from 0.7 to 1.4 (Rothwell et al 1994). A CTA approach has questioned a fi xed ICA/CCA ratio (Bartlett et al 2007).
Considering these shortcomings, it is surprising that DSA has so far remained the diagnostic gold standard with which all other methods have to compete. The rel­evance of extended meta-analyses which try to analyze sensitivity and specifi city values for the less invasive methods (duplex ultrasound, MRA, CTA) in comparison to DSA (Patel et al 2002, Wardlaw et al 2006a) is also ques­tionable. As with all other nonangiographic methods, the duplex ultrasound fi ndings have to be “imported” into the angio graphic scales. Continuous-wave Doppler sonography, in contrast, can no longer be recommended because of its low diagnostic accuracy. For instance, in a comparative Doppler and angiographic study that aimed to identify patients with ICA stenoses >60% (NASCET cri­teria), the Doppler technique yielded 41% false-positive results (Qureshi et al 2001). For further details, see Case 1.
Following this conversion, a 70% ECST ICA stenosis is equiv­alent to a 50% NASCET stenosis. Despite this correlation and the positive fi ndings in the above two clinical studies, both approaches have considerable methodological problems
Grading of ICA Stenosis by Duplex Ultrasonography
Duplex ultrasonography allows the grading of ICA stenosis according to the ECST or NASCET criteria, so ultrasound re­ports should always specify the classifi cation system used.
127Arterial Pathology
ICA
ECA
Fig. A5.51 Extracranial duplex corresponding to the DSA in Fig. A5.50. (A) B-mode image, longitudinal plane: Large, mildly hypoechoic structure in the carotid bulb as well as at the ECA origin. (B) Color- mode, cross-sectional plane: Following the ECST criteria, the diameter of the vessel (9.2 mm) and the residual lumen (3.3 mm) are assessed, resulting in a 64% stenosis. (C) Color-mode, longitudinal plane: Clear delineation of the remaining perfused lumen and confi rmation of the plaque extension. (D) Doppler spectrum analysis. Flow velocity 185/102 cm/s, indicating local stenosis, grade 60–70%.
BA
ICA
ECA
DC
The ultrasound technique works at its best if the local grade of stenosis is assessed, i.e., if the ECST grades are measured by direct analysis of cross-sectional area or lu­men reduction. The most confi dent results can be achieved in low and moderate stenoses with up to 50% lumen re­duction (Fig. A5.52). The distal ICA lumen, required for NASCET grading, is usually diffi cult to assess. However, the NASCET criteria have become the current base for clinical decision-making worldwide. The Neurosonology Research Group of the World Federation of Neurology (NSRG) has therefore proposed adapted duplex criteria, which are able to defi ne stenoses according to the NASCET system by us- ing a multiparametric approach (von Reutern et al 2012). With increasing grade of stenosis there is a shift of impor­tance from B-mode imaging to velocity measurements and nally hemodynamic parameters. To achieve this goal, all morphologic as well as direct (fl ow velocities) and indirect hemodynamic information (collateral fl ow, poststenotic ow pattern) needs to be considered by also including or­bital and intracranial fl ow parameters. In the following, we present our recommendations for the grading of ICA sten­oses which are mainly based on the NSRG criteria.
B-mode and color-mode imaging, especially in the cross-sectional plane, are the most important parameters in low-grade bulb stenoses <50% as usually no obvious velocity increase is present (see Fig. A5.11). Here we rec- ommend describing the lumen reduction in local grades and to start diagnosing a stenosis from a 30% narrowing onwards, stepwise in 10% steps up to a 50% stenosis. The calculated stenosis according to the NASCET criteria may additionally be reported. In a local stenosis between 50% and 60% (NASCET 15–35%), the main criterion is a veloc­ity increase without indirect signs of collateral fl ow or of poststenotic fl ow pattern. In local stenoses of more than 80% (NASCET 70%), indirect hemodynamic criteria are the dominant parameters demonstrating a collateral fl ow via alternative pathways (retrograde ophthalmic fl ow, cross-
BA
ECA ECA
pICA
DC
dICA dICA
Fig. A5.52 Extracranial duplex, color-mode image, cross-sectional plane, ICA bulb stenosis. (A,B) ICA bulb with a diameter reduction from 10.8 mm to 4.6 mm leading to a 57% local stenosis (A) and an area reduction from 32.7 mm stenosis (B). (C,D) Distal ICA on the same side with a diameter of 6 mm and an area of 28.9 mm NASCET of 23%.
2
to 15.9 mm2 which results in a 51%
2
resulting in a stenosis according to
pICA
ow via ACoA or PCoA or leptomeningeal collateral fl ow), and/or a poststenotic fl ow pattern characterized by a pro- longed AT and/or decreased pulsatility index (PI) in the distal ICA, and/or a prestenotic fl ow pattern in the CCA with increased pulsatility. A comparison with the unaff ect- ed side by eyeball estimate is necessary to prove a pre- or poststenotic fl ow pattern. The ICA/CCA, ICA
or ICA
lateral
ond-line criteria. However, these are less frequently used
intrastenotic
/ICA
indices may be useful as sec-
poststenotic
ipsilateral
/ICA
contra-
in our daily routine and their importance should not be overestimated. This means, in case of confl icting fi ndings, rst-line criteria (one or more signs of a hemodynamic compromise, such as collaterals or a poststenotic fl ow pat- tern) overrule second-line criteria such as the above-men­tioned ratios. If a collateral fl ow is clearly documented, a hemodynamically relevant stenosis is proven irrespective of the measured intrastenotic fl ow velocity.
For exact grading, the highest velocity within a steno­sis should be identifi ed. Depending on the confi guration of the stenosis this point can be at its origin (most fre­quent location) but also more distal, as often seen in case of dissections. In most cases a direct assessment of the highest velocities is possible; however, evaluation may be hindered or may even be impossible if severe plaque cal­cifi cation and subsequent acoustic shadowing are pres- ent. The latter is found in up to 7% of cases (Polak et al
1989) (Fig. A5.53). A deeply located vessel or an angulated vessel course may also impair the visualization of a ste­nosis. Velocity measurements should be performed with the lowest possible angle of correction (see also Chapter 1, “Doppler Shift and Flow Velocity” under “Ultrasound Principles”), following the jet of the fl ow and not the ana- tomic course of the aff ected vessel (Fig. A5.54). If present, prestenotic fl ow alterations in the distal CCA are easily detectable (Fig. A5.55). Extracranial measurements dis­tal to the stenosis are often hindered if the bifurcation is near the mandible or if the stenosis extends over a
128 5 Vascular Pathology
A
B
Fig. A5.53 Extracranial duplex, color-mode image, longitudinal view. (A,B) Examples of a distinct acoustic shadowing phenomenon caused by calcifi ed ICA plaques impeding assessment of ICA fl ow. Shortly distally a fl ow signal can be detected (B).
long segment distance. In some of these cases, the distal extra cranial ICA can be assessed in the axial plane. Unfor­tunately in this plane the angle of insonation is not well defi ned and reliable velocity measurement cannot be performed. However, spectrum analysis may still be suf­ cient to identify a poststenotic fl ow pattern and some- times there are also perivascular color artifacts, mainly during systole, surrounding the stenotic vessel (the “con­fetti eff ect;” see also Fig. A1.45). Alternatively, the fl ow pattern of the intracranial ICA below the communicating arteries, preferably at the C6-ICA segment (Fig. A5.56, top), or the OA if anterograde and not activated as a col­lateral vessel itself (Fig. A5.57) may show a poststenot­ic fl ow pattern, illustrating the hemo dynamic relevance of an extracranial ICA stenosis. The ipsilateral MCA and ACA may also be analyzed. However, in their assessment it has to be considered that collateral fi lling might have already occurred via ACoA, PCoA, and/or OA, and the ob­served MCA and ACA waveforms might no longer reveal the poststenotic ICA fl ow pattern (Fig. A5.56, bottom). In the case of a collateral fl ow via the PCoA, the ACA might show a more distinct poststenotic fl ow pattern compared with the MCA which can be best explained by a func­tioning ACoA and a patent contralateral A1-ACA ensur­ing fl ow to both ACA territories (Fig. A5.58). A synopsis of recommended duplex ultrasound criteria for grading of a proximal ICA stenosis considering the multipara­metric approach of morphology, direct and indirect fl ow parameters based on the NSRG criteria (von Reutern et al 2012) is given in Fig. A5.59. Particularly important are the threshold values which defi ne an ICA stenosis >50% according to the NASCET criteria. The NSRG recommend­ed using the relatively low USA threshold values (see be­low). However, they also added an analysis of data from ve DSA-correlated studies including 977 stenoses, which together revealed higher average peak systolic fl ow ve- locities. Interestingly, the latter are closely equivalent to the threshold values usually used in European countries.
BA
Fig. A5.54 Extracranial duplex, color-mode image, longitudinal plane. Image of a high-grade ICA stenosis with lumen reduction and color-aliasing at the stenosis. Direction of the fl ow stream (“jet”) and vessel course is not equivalent, complicating the e x a c t p l a c e m e n t o f t h e a n g l e c o r r e c t i o n . ( A) Inappropriate angle correction placement following the vessel course (398/197 cm/s). (B) Preferred placement following the fl ow jet within the stenosis resulting in a diff erent velocity (270/128 cm/s).
Fig. A5.55 Assessment of pre- and poststenotic blood fl ow in the CCA, proximal ICA, and distal ICA. Left: Dop pler sp ect ra in unaff ect- ed vessels. Right: Flow patterns in a >80% ICA stenosis (ECST crite­ria): Prestenotic fl ow pattern in the CCA with reduced fl ow velocity and increased pulsatility (bottom), intrastenotic elevated fl ow ve- locity and spectral broadening (middle), poststenotic fl ow pattern in the distal ICA with reduced fl ow velocity, pulsatility and delayed systolic fl ow acceleration (top). Note the distal ICA collapse.
It seems therefore more reasonable to use these average velocities as threshold values for grading of ICA stenosis in addition to the indispensable indirect hemodynamic marker. The 90% grade according to NASCET (95% accord­ing to ECST) represents the specifi c fi ndings in near-oc- clusion. Ultrasound reports should always state the clas­sifi cation system used. This approach, including a grading in 10% steps, is used in many European centers and is well accepted as it has been shown to be a reliable approach if applied by experienced sonographers (Dippel et al 1997). In North America the intracranial and intraorbital fl ow parameters are normally not analyzed and therefore the grading of ICA stenosis is mainly based on intrastenotic