Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5776_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
53 Мб
Скачать
189Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA)
A
C
B
D
Fig. A6.8 Various veno graphy t echni ques. (A) MSCT venography, semitransparent 3D rendering, superoposterior view. Extended superior sinus venous thrombosis is delineated by the tram-track sign (arrows). (B) Contrast-enhanced 3D GE venography (lateral MIP), providing vessel resolution, that closely approximates that of CT venography, superior to 2D TOF-MRV (lateral MIP) in the same patient (C). (D) MSCT venography, semitransparent 3D rendering. Note a cortical venous thrombosis with interruption of a cortical vein (arrow).
Contrast-enhanced (ce) 3D MRA
namic imaging techniques are feasible. Special focus on
k-space data collection can help increasing the signal­The ce-MRA technique was developed because of the methodological limitations of TOF-MRA, caused by sat­uration eff ects, spin dephasing, restricted fi eld of view, and relatively long scan times. This technique is the ba­sic method for assessing extracranial brain-supplying arteries. It requires the use of intravenous gadolinium for vessel visualization, as the signal is based on the in­travascular T1-shortening eff ect of gadolinium. A short TR is chosen, as well as a short scan time, to allow for breath-hold imaging. These prerequisites are met when a FLASH technique is used, spoiling residual transverse magnetization subsequent to signal read-out. To opti­mize signal intensity and avoid venous contamination, proper bolus timing is essential, either by measuring circulation times beforehand or by applying a fl uoro- scopic bolus triggering technique (automated or op­erator-driven). As compared with TOF and PC-MRA, image artifacts are reduced, in-plane (longitudinal) vessel imaging is possible (large fi eld of view), and dy-
to-noise ratio, as the contrast information is located
in the center of the k-space; this information should
be read out early when maximum intravascular bolus
concentration is given (Klingebiel et al 2007, Zhang et
al 2007). Willinek and colleagues (2005) encountered
comparable sensitivity and specifi city of ce 3D MRA
and DSA for assessment of steno-occlusive diseases of
the supra-aortic arteries including the cerebral arterial
circle (circle of Willis). A diagnostic image quality com-
parable with those obtained by using CTA and DSA for
detection of arterial stenoses has been established for
supra-aortic arteries when using ce-MR angiography at
3.0 T (Nael et al 2007). The capacity of ce-MRA for rapid 3D data acquisition
has been exploited for the establishment of time- resolved (4D) MRA, most commonly using time intervals of 1–2 seconds per 3D volume, but also allowing for sub­second scanning rates. Variants of 4D MRA are known as TRICKS (time- resolved imaging of contrast kinetics), TREAT
190 6 Angiographic Techniques in Neuroradiology
A
B
Fig. A6.9 In-plane saturation artifact in TOF-MRA. Although back­ground suppression and signal-to-noise ratio with TOF-MRA (A) are superior to contrast-enhanced 3D FLASH MRA (B), the relevant fi nd- ing of a dissecting sub-basal aneurysm (arrow) of the right ICA after dissection is masked by in-plane saturation eff ects in TOF-MRA.
(time- resolved echo-shared angiography technique), or TWIST (time-resolved angiography with stochastic trajec­tories) (Hadizadeh et al 2014). Generally speaking, these variants diff er with regard to data acquisition of the k-space. Although to some extent these techniques trade off image quality for hemodynamic assessment, it has been shown that in various settings, such as in detecting intracranial and spinal dural arteriovenous fi stulas, they can compete with invasive radiologic techniques (Nishimura et al 2010).
Advantages and Disadvantages
The major craniocervical applications of 3D TOF-MRA as compared with 3D FLASH MRA are determined by their technical specifi cations. In TOF-MRA, commonly used for intracranial MRA, an imaging plane perpendic­ular to the major fl ow direction is essential (see above), thus rendering this technique inappropriate for imag­ing longer vessel segments (e.g., extracranial vessels of the neck). In contrast, the large fi eld of view and rapid data acquisition with ce-3D FLASH MRA not only make it possible to cover the craniocervical vasculature from the aortic arch to the vertex but also allow dynamic (time-resolved) imaging.
TOF- and PC-MRA have the advantage that the use of contrast medium can be avoided, which is of special benefi t for pregnant or breast-feeding patients and pa- tients with severe kidney disease. Nephrogenic systemic
brosis (NSF) related to gadolinium use was fi rst de- scribed in 2006 (Grobner 2006) and prompted the imple­mentation of guidelines for the use of MR contrast media (Thomsen 2009), with a subsequent signifi cant decrease in NSF incidence (Daftari Besheli et al 2014).
An inherent advantage of MRA, as compared with the competing angiographic techniques, is that it does not in­volve exposure to ionizing radiation, another important issue especially in pregnancy and early childhood.
Absolute contraindications to MRI have been defi ned as electronically, magnetically, and mechanically activated implants (such as defi brillators and cardiac pacemakers) as well as ferromagnetic foreign bodies if not encapsulat­ed subcutaneously by fi brous tissue. Relative contraindi- cations are cochlear implants and noncardiac pacemakers (e.g., nerve stimulators or insulin pumps): Recently a new generation of cardiac pacemakers has been introduced and proven to be “conditionally safe,” meaning that MR scanning is considered safe if certain precautions (e.g., a maximum of 1.5 T) are established (Gimbel et al 2013). Lead wires pose a risk because of the potential of current induction in a powerful magnetic fi eld. Most prosthetic heart valves are exposed to a higher stress by cardiac he­modynamics than that exerted by the MR scanner. Oste­osynthetic material is usually anchored, but might cause induction heating. In addition, image quality may be se­verely degraded. The majority of other metallic implants, such as modern surgical clips, do not represent a hazard. Nevertheless, in each individual case the patient has to be thoroughly investigated with respect to these contraindi­cations and guidelines (Chow and Nazarian 2014).
Vas cular sten ts, comm only encou ntered nowa days in elderly patients, have been shown to suff er from defl ec- tion forces that may exceed safety limits in high fi eld scan- ners in an experimental setting (Shellock 2002). However, in patients who are scheduled for MRI several weeks after stent angioplasty, endothelial overgrowth of the implant device makes stent displacement very unlikely. Tattoos and permanent make-up, even without iron constituents, may cause skin burns (Franiel et al 2006) and the patient has to be informed accordingly.
Disadvantages of TOF-MRA are limited spatial resolu­tion and the exaggeration of the degree of stenosis as the
ow within the vessel and not the vessel diameter itself de- nes the signal. Also, TOF-MRA is inappropriate for di er-
entiating a high-grade stenosis or near-occlusion from an occlusion. Another limitation of 3D TOF-MRA with regard to aneurysm assessment is that turbulent intra-aneurysm ow may obscure the pathology or result in underestima­tion of the volume and neck size of the aneurysm (see Fig. A6.9). Nevertheless, especially younger patients with a family history of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) caused by aneurysm are commonly referred to MRA for assess­ment. Limited suitability of 3D TOF-MRA for assessing smaller aneurysms (<3 mm) has also been reported (Mine et al 2015). Good sensitivity for detecting more clinical­ly relevant aneurysms (>3 mm diameter) was reported, although 3-T TOF-MRA performed signifi cantly less well than DSA in terms of aneurysm characterization (neck size, bleb detection, branching arteries).
TOF-MRA is, however, usually the preferred method for analyzing intracranial vessels. The main reason is the
191Computed Tomographic Angiography (CTA)
large fi eld of view (FOV) as well as the coronal slab plane in ce-MRA which is chosen for maximum coverage along the longitudinal course of cervical vessels, thus limiting imaging of the intracranial vasculature. Also, the large FOV decreases spatial resolution and the coronal slab re­stricts coverage of vessels in the sagittal plane (e.g., the parietooccipital arteries).
In the acute SAH setting, limited feasibility for MRA
in patient assessment has been reported (Pierot et al
2013), mostly due to lack of patient compliance. In a recent meta-analysis both TOF-MRA and ce-MRA have been shown to be highly accurate for the detection of any r e c a n a l i z a t i o n i n i n t r a c r a n i a l a n e u r y s m s t r e a t e d w i t h endovascular coil occlusion (van Amerongen et al 2014).
2D-TOF is a technique that has been widely used for
ruling out dural sinus venous thrombosis, but suff ers from inherent image artifacts that may simulate the pa­thology, and must be reliably ruled out (Ayanzen et al
2000). For these reasons, 2D-TOF venography should be replaced by ce-MRV (Klingebiel et al 2007).
Cervicocranial MRA, together with cross-sectional MRI is a proven modality for detecting intramural he­matoma when ICA and/or vertebral artery (VA) dissec­tion is presumed; due to its technique, including image subtraction, vascular pathology close to the skull is easily depicted without interference by bony structures, unlike unsubtracted CTA.
PC-MRA is still in limited use for specifi c indications such as vessel scout scans, fl ow quantifi cation, and thick slab imaging of specifi c vessels (superior sagittal sinus), although providing information about fl ow velocity as well as fl ow direction. Longer scan times, inferior spatial resolution, and increased operator demands when c o m p a r e d w i t h 3 D T O F - M R A a l l r e p r e s e n t d i s a d v a n t a g e s for the daily clinical use of PC-MRA.
Computed Tomographic Angiography (CTA)
Historical Development
CT uses X-rays to generate cross-sectional images derived from serial and digitally postprocessed images taken around a single axis of rotation. The term is derived from the Greek words tomos (slice) and graphien (to write).
X-rays pass through the body, and the diff erence be- tween emitted signal intensity and intensity measured by the detector elucidates the attenuation character­istics within a body plane of interest. To reconstruct the image, an inversion of the Radon transformation is used. Godfrey Hounsfi eld was awarded the Nobel Prize for his work on several prototype CT scanners (Ambrose and Hounsfi eld 1973) together with Allan M. Cormack, a physicist, in 1979. The fi rst CT studies in humans were performed in 1971.
Subsequent technical improvements have led to sever­al generations of scanners, with the introduction of multi­slice CT (MSCT) in 1999 (Hu 1999) as one of the milestones in the history of the technique. Although CT applications for assessment of intracranial vascular pathology were d e s c r i b e d a s e a r l y a s t h e 1 9 7 0 s ( M i c h e l s e t a l 1 9 7 7 ) , i t w a s
A
B
Fig. A6.10 Dual-source CT venogram without (A) and with (B) bone subtraction, lateral projection.
not until the introduction of spiral (also called helical) CT in 1990 by W. Kalendar (Kalendar and Polacin 1991), that this technique was considered as an alternative to conven­tional angiography in selected cases (Napel et al 1992).
The multislice technique has been continuously refi ned from scanners providing 4 detector rows with a minimum collimation of 0.5 mm (resulting in high- resolution z-axis coverage of 2 mm per rotation) to 256 and 320 detector rows (Klingebiel et al 2002, 2008, 2009). The 320-row scanner type (Aquilion ONE, Toshiba Medical Systems) provides high-resolution z-axis coverage of 160 mm, a l l o w i n g f o r w h o l e - b r a i n i m a g i n g b y j u s t o n e g a n t r y r o ­tation. Clinical implications of extensive brain coverage by these modern CT scanners include time-resolved ves­sel and perfusion imaging (4D imaging), wherein the CT data are exploited for dynamic CTA as well as for high­resolution whole-brain perfusion (Klingebiel et al 2009).
The introduction of so-called dual-source (or d u a l - e n e r g y ) C T s c a n n e r s ( D S C T ) i n 2 0 0 6 , p r i m a r i l y f o ­cusing on high temporal resolution for cardiac imaging (Flohr et al 2006), also had an impact on supra-aortic vessel assessment (Fig. A6.10). DSCT uses two X-ray tubes with diff erent voltages and is capable of sepa- rating iodine from bone or metallic artifacts, based on their diff erent absorption spectra. Accordingly, it al- lows for removal of the skull and hard plaques, and it has been proven to correlate well (r = 0.95) with DSA in the assessment of calcifi ed carotid stenosis (Uotani et al 2009). DSCT also appears to be a powerful tool in artifact reduction (e.g., metallic implants) as well as in
192 6 Angiographic Techniques in Neuroradiology
d i ff erentiating intracranial hemorrhage from contrast extravasation (Phan et al 2012).
Technical Aspects
Until the introduction of MSCT into clinical imaging, comprehensive cervicocranial vascular imaging by spiral CT was limited by the heat-load capacity of the X-ray tube as well as by radiation exposure issues. The introduction of multislice CT not only meant multiple row scanning (4, 16, 64, up to 320 rows) instead of just one row, but was also as­sociated with an increased rotational speed (0.5 s/rotation) and improved heat-load capacity. Taken together these qualities permitted comprehensive high-resolution cervi­cocranial vessel assessment from the aortic arch up to the superior sagittal sinus ( Klingebiel et al 2002). Almost simul­taneously, various workstations for postprocessing of the high-image-load delivered by MSCT were introduced into the market. These workstations signifi cantly facilitated 2D as well as 3D rendering of up to ~800 slices (cervicocranial CTA), enabling meaningful condensation of abundant im­age information into just a handful of color-coded photo­realistic image reconstructions. With the introduction of 4D cerebrovascular imaging by 256–320-row scanners, comprehensive stroke imaging protocols (3D cervical CTA, 4D cranial CTA and perfusion imaging) resulted in >8,000 cross-sectional images (Siebert et al 2009). Only dedicated workstations connected to the scanner via local networks are able to postprocess these volumes of data and new con­cepts are required as to how, and which, elements of this abundant study data are transferred to a picture archiving and communication system (PACS).
In terms of radiation exposure, overbeaming and overscanning became important keywords in MSCT. Overbeaming means extending the cone beam beyond the outer borders of activated detectors to avoid criti­cally low doses with respect to image quality in the out­skirts of the detector row. In consequence, the border zone areas were redundantly exposed, causing increased radiation exposure to the patient (Tzedakis et al 2005). Overbeaming is signifi cantly reduced in 64-slice scanner as compared with the 4-slice-scanner generation. This rendered MSCT scanners with a higher number of de­tector rows more suitable for cervicocranial CTA than the basic 4-slice scanners. Overscanning means that to be able to reconstruct the images, the multislice scanner needs an extra rotation at the start and at the end of the spiral scan. For scan lengths of more than 30–35 cm, as in cervicocranial CTA, this eff ect is negligible.
ED fi gures for cervicocranial CTA have been report- ed to range between 4.7 and 5.6 mSv (Cohnen et al 2006, Diekmann et al 2010, Mnyusiwalla et al 2009). Recent CT techniques, using iterative reconstruction, low- voltage, automatic exposure control, and/or high pitch protocols, have led to dose reductions of >50%. ED gures as low as 0.2–0.28 mSv have been demonstrated in cerebral CTA using 80 kVp (G.Z. Chen et al 2015, Sa­barudin et al 2014), as opposed to 1.9 mSv in the study by Cohnen et al (2006).
After ensuring adequate intravenous access by using an 18–20-gauge venous cannula, the patient is connected to a power injector. If possible, the side of minor clinical
interest should be chosen for venous access, as the high in­jection pressure may push contrast medium upward into the cervical vessels, obscuring the contours of the proximal common carotid artery as well as that of the internal ca­rotid artery, especially in patients with venous valvular in­suffi ciency. Usually, the scan is started in one of two ways: (1) A low-dose, dynamic scan is performed at the level of the internal carotid artery and the spiral scan is then initi­ated as soon as the operator detects the arrival of contrast medium at the chosen level; or (2) a so-called “sure start” protocol is used. This protocol usually means that a region of interest is defi ned in the aortic arch or descending aorta, where a predetermined density level automatically trig­gers initiation of the spiral scan. Correct venous line place­ment is still important, even though injection velocities up to 20 mL/s, as required in the initial CTP protocols (Koenig et al 1998) are no longer necessary, due to the widespread use of deconvolution algorithms in CT perfusion imaging (Hoeff ner et al 2004). Routinely, a total of 50–80 mL of contrast medium (nonionic iodinated medium, containing 370 mg/mL iodine) is administered over 20 s, chased by a bolus of 20–30 mL isotonic saline.
Advantages and Disadvantages
Although technical progress has led to a signifi cant de- crease in radiation exposure in all CTA procedures, the indication for CTA has to be carefully weighed against al­ternative imaging techniques for each individual patient, considering especially whether the expected diagnostic information might be obtained by a procedure without ra­diation exposure. Alternate techniques such as ultrasound and MR as well as invasive catheter angiography are avail­able in most major hospitals during normal working hours. However, the majority of stroke patients are critically ill patients beyond reproductive age in whom time-effi cient, operator-independent, comprehensive assessment of the craniocervical vasculature is required 24/7, with as few limitations to vital parameter monitoring as possible. No other modality combines these qualities, making MSCT the undisputed fi rst-line imaging modality in stroke patients (Donahue and Wintermark 2015).
Given technically correct performance of CTA, high intravascular contrast is achieved, ensuring 2D and 3D reconstructions of unprecedented image quality. When time effi ciency is the issue in stroke imaging, the strik- ingly short data acquisition fi gures for comprehensive craniocervical CTA are often mentioned; but the clinical imaging time also includes image data reconstruction, data transfer (local workstation and/or PACS), as well as post­processing before the fi nal radiologic study report can be delivered to the referring neurologist. Thus, time effi ciency in the assessment of stroke patients is not just a matter of the number of detector rows but of appropriate internal network structures and postprocessing facilities.
Contraindications to CTA are the same as those in any iodine-using X-ray study and include impaired renal function, hyperthyroidism, and iodine allergy. Yet, for vi­tal diagnostic purposes, these contraindications might be overcome by either kidney protective measures such as intravenous fl uids, acetylcysteine injection and/or dialysis, thyroid-blocking drugs, or pretreatment with
193Computed Tomographic Angiography (CTA)
antihistaminic drugs as well as intravenous cortisone. Moreover, it has been shown that functional stroke CT (CTA, CT perfusion) did not increase the incidence of con­trast-induced nephropathy (Adalsteinsson et al 2003).
Spatial resolution and vessel-to-background ratio are the decisive factors for delineating small vascular details, e.g., very fi ne vessels in cerebral vasculitis (Fig. A6.11). In a comparative study of DSA and MSCTA the smallest arterial size reliably detected with MSCTA was 0.7 mm, versus 0.4 mm for DSA (Villablanca et al 2007). In a meta-analysis of 50 studies comparing CTA and DSA for aneurysm assessment in SAH patients (Westerlaan et al
2011), the pooled sensitivity and specifi city fi gures for CTA amounted to 98% and 100% (even though most stud­ies used 4-row scanners). Thus, in most centers SAH pa­tients are primarily assessed by CTA (especially outside normal working hours), followed by DSA in negative CTA studies or if necessary for treatment planning. This strat­egy was also shown to be most cost-eff ective (Sailer et al
2014), another important issue in times of limited health­care resources (Fig. A6.12).
Although 4D-CTA carries the highest radiation expo­sure, it has also been shown to deliver abundant clinical relevant information, not only in regard to intracranial vascular malformations, but especially in ischemic stroke: 4D-CTA better defi ned thrombus burden and collateral vessel status (Kortman et al 2015, Siebert et al 2012).
In terms of intracerebral hemorrhage (e.g., hemor­rhagic stroke), the “spot sign” (Fig. A6.13) as detected in CTA has been shown to be a reliable imaging biomarker for hematoma expansion with prognostic and therapeu-
CBA
Fig. A6.12 DSA (A) and MSCTA (B) comparison for aneurysm assessment. Atypical presumptive mycotic aneurysm at the right-sided T-junction level (arrows). Both techniques provide equivalent diagnostic information.
Fig. A6.11 Cerebral vasculitis, frontal projections. DSA, left ICA injection (A), shows multiple ves­sel irregularities (arrows), some of which are more pronounced on MSCTA images (B) or even 3D TOF-MRA (C). MCA stenosis seems exaggerated by TOF-MRA (C), indicating increased stenosis sensitivity but ineffi cient steno- sis grading. Moreover, resolution of detail is clearly inferior to DSA and CTA.
BA
tic implications (Du et al 2014). A higher sensitivity for spot sign detection was described when using CT perfu­sion (Koculym et al 2013).
Both CT and MRI are able to comprehensively assess the craniocervical vasculature and provide all informa­tion necessary for decision-making and therapy planning in stroke patients. Yet, scanner availability, compliance and safety issues, as well as time- and cost-eff ectiveness all speak in favor of CT-based evaluation of acute stroke patients (Hoeff ner et al 2004, Tong et al 2015).
BCA
Fig. A6.13 CTA (A) and plain CT on admission (B), with only CTA showing a “dot sign” (ar­row) within the parenchymal hematoma. (C) Follow-up CT reveals progress of intracrani­al hemorrhage (ICH) into the left lateral ventricle.
Part B Case Histories
Case 1 Right Extracranial Internal Carotid
Artery Stenosis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
Case 2 Free-fl oating Thrombus of the
Left Internal Carotid Artery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205
Case 3 Left Common Carotid Artery Occlusion . . . . . 210
Case 4 Left Temporal Arteriovenous Malformation . . 215
Case 5 Left M1 Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis . . . . . 222
Case 6 Left P2 Posterior Cerebral Artery Stenosis . . . . . 230
Case 7 Cerebral Circulatory Arrest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235
Case 8 Basilar Artery Occlusion in Bilateral
Intracranial V4 Vertebral Artery Stenosis . . . . . 244
Case 9 Moyamoya Disease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251
Case 10 Thrombolysis of M1 Middle Cerebral
Artery Occlusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 260
Case 11 Secondary Occlusion in Left-sided
Extracranial Internal Carotid
Artery Dissection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269
Case 12 Extracranial Bilateral Internal Carotid
Artery and Right Vertebral Artery Occlusion, and Left Vertebral
Artery Stenosis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281
Case 13 Right Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis
in Fibromuscular Dysplasia and Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis
(formerly Wegener’s Granulomatosis) . . . . . . 288
Case 14 Isolated Left Carotid Siphon Stenosis . . . . . . . 295
Case 15 Near-occlusion of the Right and
High-grade Stenosis of the Left
Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery . . . . . . . . 300
Case 16 Giant Cell Arteritis with Bilateral
Intracranial V4 Vertebral Artery Stenosis . . . . . 313
Case 17 Ascending Left Middle Cerebral Artery
Occlusion in an HIV-positive Patient . . . . . . . 320
Case 18 Traumatic Bilateral Internal Carotid and
Vertebral Artery Dissection with Right-sided Embolic Middle Cerebral
Artery Occlusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327
Case 19 Bilateral Extracranial Vertebral Artery
Dissection with Distal Occlusion of the
Right Vertebral Artery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339
Case 20 Right Internal Carotid Artery
Dissection with Fast Recanalization . . . . . . . . 345
Case 21 Mid-basilar Artery Occlusion Due to
Intracranial Dissection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 354
Case 22 Right Mid-part M1 Middle Cerebral
Artery Occlusion with Prominent Early Temporal Branch and Patent
Foramen Ovale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 362
Case 23 Takayasu’s Arteritis with Right-sided
Subclavian Steal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 372
Case 24 Dissection of the Right Extracranial
Internal Carotid Artery and Left M1
Middle Cerebral Artery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380
Case 25 Progressive Right M1 Middle Cerebral
Artery Occlusion Treated with
Extracranial–Intracranial Bypass Surgery . . . . . 388
Case 26 Extracranial Left Vertebral Artery
Dissecting Aneurysm Following
Basilar Artery Stenting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 396
Case 27
Case 28 Subclavian Steal in Left Subclavian
Case 29 Cerebral Venous Thrombosis . . . . . . . . . . . . . 420
Case 30 Multilocular Extra- and Intracranial
Di
use Cerebral Angiomatosis . . . . . . . . . . . . 402
Artery and Right Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion Leading to
Extracranial–Intracranial Bypass Surgery . . . . . 409
Stenoses and Occlusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 427
Case 31 Dissection of the Right Internal Carotid
Artery C6 Segment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 440
Case 32 Right Temporal Hemorrhage in Pial
Arteriovenous Malformation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 444
Case 33 Subarachnoid Hemorrhage after
Rupture of Left Supraophthalmic
Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm . . . . . . . . . 448
Case 34 Right-sided Occipital Dural
Arteriovenous Fistula . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 460
Case 35 Left Distal Vertebral Artery Occlusion
and Right Vertebral Artery Hypoplasia
with Retrograde Basilar Artery Flow . . . . . . . . 470
Case 36 Postpartum Angiopathy (Reversible
Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome) . . . . . . 476
Case 37 Left Anterior Choroidal Artery Infarction
in Left Supraophthalmic Internal Carotid
Artery Occlusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 483
Case 38 Left-sided Amaurosis in Left Central
Retinal Artery Occlusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 489
Case 39 Combined Chronic Right-sided
Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery
and Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion . . . . . . 494
Case 40 Left Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion
and Ipsilateral Arteriovenous Malformation in Infl ammatory
Bowel Disease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500
Case 41 Right Internal Carotid Artery
as the Remaining Patent
Brain-supplying Artery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 509
Case 42 Left Internal Carotid Artery Aplasia as
an Incidental Diagnosis in Optic
Neuritis in Lupus Erythematosus . . . . . . . . . . . 517
Case 43 Sickle Cell Disease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 524
Case 44 Transient Global Amnesia with Left
Hippocampal Diff usion-weighted Lesion and Asymptomatic Right Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction
in High-grade Right M1 Stenosis . . . . . . . . . . 529
Case 45 Bilateral Proximal Vertebral Artery
Stenosis and Bilateral Middle
Cerebral Artery Aneurysm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 535
Case 1
Right Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis
197
Clinical Presentation
A 70-year-old man presented to the emergency depart­ment with a sudden onset of numbness in his left arm. He had a history of cigarette smoking (but had discon­tinued smoking 10 years before admission), arterial hypertension, hyperlipoproteinemia, peripheral arterial occlusive disease with femoral artery stenting several years prior, and a 50% right-sided internal carotid ar­tery (ICA) stenosis (NASCET criteria) diagnosed 1 year prior. The patient was being treated with metoprolol, simvastatin, and aspirin/dipyridamole. His neurologic examination on admission was within normal limits and thrombolysis was therefore not performed.
Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
Initial cranial CT showed no signs of ischemia (not shown).
Suspected Diagnosis
Right-hemispheric transient ischemic attack (TIA) in the right middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory with tran­sient sensory defi cits of the left arm.
Questions to Answer Using Ultrasound Techniques
• Was it possible to confi rm the 50% (NASCET criteria) right ICA stenosis?
• Was there any stenosis progression?
• If so, what was the grade of stenosis?
and comparable on both sides. There were no patholog­ic fi ndings in the left ICA (Fig. B1.1, Fig. B1.2, Fig. B1.3,
Fig. B1.4, Fig. B1.5; see also Video
B1.1).
Contrast-enhanced Harmonic Imaging
For advanced plaque analysis, contrast harmonic im­aging was performed. 1 mL SonoVue was injected intravenously into an antecubital vein and the pat­tern of contrast arrival was analyzed in a longitudinal and cross-sectional imaging plane. Imaging revealed a marked irregular surface within the stenosis with several circumscribed ulcerations which were visible as contrast traces extending into the plaque material (Fig. B1.6 and Video contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging see Chapter 1, “Harmonic Imaging and Ultrasound Contrast Agents” under “Imaging Modalities, Parameters, and Settings.”)
B1.2). (For further reading about
Transcranial Duplex Sonography
All detectable intracranial vessels including the ophthal­mic arteries (OAs) revealed normal and symmetric fl ow signals (not shown).
Conclusion
Nearly unchanged right ICA stenosis of 50–60% according to the NASCET criteria (equaling 70–75% using ECST cri­teria) directly above the carotid bifurcation. The anecho­ic stenotic material was thought to be a smooth-surfaced “soft plaque” and not a fresh, unorganized intravascular thrombus.
Initial Neurosonologic Findings
Extracranial Duplex Sonography
B-mode sonography revealed generalized atherosclerotic vessel wall thickening. The color-fl ow image of the right ICA showed a lumen reduction distal to the carotid bifur­cation caused by a large anechoic mass. Doppler spectrum analysis in the narrowing revealed a raised fl ow velocity of 225/99 cm/s with mild fl ow turbulence. Cross- sectional insonation confi rmed a marked reduction of the vessel di- ameter. Distal of the stenosis, the ICA Doppler spectrum almost normalized (fl ow velocity: 109/33 cm/s). Blood ow in the common carotid arteries (CCA) was regular
MRI
Diff usion-weighted MRI sequences showed an acute right-sided partial territorial MCA infarct of assumed em­bolic origin within the region of the sensory cortex. No old ischemic lesions were seen. MR angiography (MRA) was not performed (Fig. B1.7).
CT Angiography
CT angiography (CTA) showed segmental ICA narrowing with an ulcerated surface directly above the bifurcation. The stenotic segment extended ~2 cm. The calculated
198 Case 1 Right Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis
ICA-L
Fig. B1.1 Extracranial duplex, longitudinal plane. Normal fl ow signal in the left ICA (fl ow velocity 62/22 cm/s).
ICA-R
ICA-R
Fig. B1.2 Extracranial duplex, transversal plane, color-mode image. Cross-sectional imaging of the right ICA with marked segmental narrowing caused by nonechogenic material. Left: Diameter reduc­tion assessment, bulb diameter 8.8 mm, residual perfused diameter
2.1 mm resulting in a calculated 76% local-grade stenosis. Right: Identical image but area reduction assessment, bulb area 55 mm residual perfused area 10 mm
ICA-R
2
, resulting in a calculated 82% stenosis.
2
,
Fig. B1.3 Extracranial duplex, longitudinal plane, color-mode image. Right ICA with lumen narrowing over a distance of ~2 cm. Note the intrastenotic color aliasing phenomenon, indicating local­ly raised fl ow velocity.
grade of stenosis was 73% according to ECST criteria (local stenosis grade) and 54% according to the NASCET criteria (Fig. B1.8, Fig. B1.9, Fig. B1.10). There were no pathologic ndings in the distal ICA or the MCA on the aff ected side.
Fig. B1.4 Extracranial duplex, longitudinal plane. Doppler spec­trum analysis of the right ICA with intrastenotic fl ow velocity of 225/99 cm/s.
terectomy (CEA). Intraoperatively, a soft plaque with an irregular surface was removed (Fig. B1.11). There was no evidence of a fresh thrombus. The operation and postoperative clinical course were uneventful. No further ischemic attacks occurred. Transthoracic echo­cardiography and a 24-hour electrocardiogram (ECG)
Clinical Course
were normal.
Considering the clinical event during best medical treatment, the anechoic high-grade stenosis identi-
Final Diagnosis
ed using ultrasound, and the demarcation of a hyper­acute ischemia in the corresponding distal intracranial vascular territory, a symptomatic stenosis requiring interventional treatment was diagnosed. Two days af­ter admission, the patient underwent carotid endar-
Symptomatic right-sided high-grade ICA stenosis with a lumen reduction of 70–80% (ECST criteria), correspond­ing to 50–60% (NASCET criteria) caused by anechoic plaque.