Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_636_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •Puborectalis Muscle
- •Iliococcygeus Muscle
- •Pubococcygeus Muscle
- •Mesorectum
- •Presacral Fascia
- •Retrosacral Fascia
- •Waldeyer’s Fascia
- •Denonvilliers’ Fascia
- •Lateral Ligaments
- •Anorectal Spaces
- •Perianal Space
- •Intersphincteric Space
- •Submucous Space
- •Ischioanal/Ischiorectal Space
- •Supralevator Space
- •Anal Canal Epithelium
- •Internal Anal Sphincter
- •Conjoined Longitudinal Muscle
- •External Anal Sphincter
- •Perineal Body
- •Pelvic Floor Muscles
- •Retrorectal Space
- •Rectal Blood Supply
- •Superior Rectal Artery
- •Middle Rectal Artery
- •Inferior Rectal Artery
- •Cecum
- •The Appendix
- •Ascending Colon
- •Transverse Colon
- •Descending Colon
- •Sigmoid Colon
- •Rectosigmoid Junction
- •Blood Supply
- •Superior Mesenteric Artery
- •Inferior Mesenteric Artery
- •Venous Drainage
- •Lymphatic Drainage
- •Nervous Innervation
- •Embryology
- •Non-rotation
- •Malrotation
- •Reversed Rotation
- •Omphalocele
- •Internal Hernias
- •Proximal Colon Duplication
- •Meckel’s Diverticulum
- •Hirschsprung’s Disease
- •Anorectal Malformations
- •Anal Stenosis
- •Membranous Atresia
- •Anal Agenesis
- •Anorectal Agenesis
- •Rectal Atresia or “High Atresia”
- •Persistent Cloaca
- •2: Colonic Physiology
- •Colonic Anatomy
- •Introduction
- •Colonic Wall Anatomy
- •Colonic Epithelial Cell Types
- •Colonic Flora
- •Electrolyte Regulation and Water Absorption
- •Short-Chain Fatty Acid Absorption
- •Secretory Role of the Colonic Epithelium
- •Regulation of Electrolyte and Water Absorption and Secretion
- •Colonic Innervation
- •Colonic Motility
- •Cellular Basis of Motility
- •Motility Patterns and Measurement
- •Introduction
- •Normal Continence
- •Rectal Capacity
- •Structural Considerations
- •Normal Defecation
- •Obstructed Defecation
- •Functional Anorectal Pain
- •4: Endoscopy
- •Introduction
- •The Complete Anorectal Examination
- •Patient Position
- •Prone Jackknife
- •Left Lateral
- •Digital Rectal Examination
- •Anoscopy/Proctoscopy
- •Anoscopy
- •Proctoscopy
- •Flexible Endoscopy
- •Flexible Endoscopic Insertion Techniques
- •Torque
- •Dithering/Jiggle
- •Slide-By
- •Special Considerations
- •The Patient Requiring Antibiotics
- •The Anticoagulated Patient
- •Incomplete Colonoscopy
- •Procedure
- •The Endoscopy Suite
- •Instruments
- •Sedation
- •Nitrous Oxide
- •Ketamine
- •Propofol
- •Colonoscopy Technique
- •Anal Intubation
- •Sigmoid Colon
- •Sigmoid-Descending Junction
- •Descending Colon
- •Splenic Flexure
- •Transverse Colon
- •Hepatic Flexure
- •Cecum
- •Patient Position
- •Abdominal Pressure
- •Sigmoidoscopy
- •Colonoscopy
- •Bowel Preparation
- •Ileocecal Valve Intubation
- •Terminal Ileum
- •Alternate Techniques
- •Chromocolonoscopy (Chromoendoscopy)
- •Full-Spectrum Endoscopy
- •Complications
- •Sedation Complications
- •Vasovagal/Cardiac Arrhythmia
- •Pulmonary
- •Procedural Complications
- •Splenic Injury
- •Perforation
- •Post-polypectomy Syndrome
- •Bleeding
- •Infectious Complications
- •Simulation
- •Documentation
- •Quality
- •PillCam Endoscopy
- •Introduction
- •Polypectomy Techniques
- •Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
- •Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
- •Combined Endo-Laparoscopic Surgery (CELS)
- •Major Abdominal Surgery
- •Anorectal Surgery
- •Preoperative Testing
- •Laboratory Studies
- •Electrocardiogram
- •Chest X-ray
- •Initial Workup
- •Who Needs Additional Testing?
- •Preoperative “Optimization”
- •Coronary Stent Management
- •AICD/Pacemaker Management
- •COPD
- •Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)
- •Diabetes
- •Obesity
- •Malnutrition
- •Solid Organ Transplant Recipients
- •Substance Abuse
- •Alcohol
- •Tobacco
- •Opioids
- •Medications
- •Anticoagulation
- •Immunosuppressive Agents
- •Chemotherapy
- •Introduction
- •Preoperative Management
- •Patient Education
- •Intraoperative Pathway
- •Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery
- •Intraoperative Fluid Administration
- •Analgesia
- •Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis
- •Postoperative Recovery
- •Analgesia
- •Intravenous Fluid Management
- •Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis
- •Quality Pathway Evaluation Measures
- •Quality Improvement Measures
- •8: Postoperative Complications
- •Introduction
- •Ureteral Injury
- •Bladder Injury
- •Urethral Injury
- •IV Fluid Management
- •Wound Management
- •Bladder Management
- •Pain Management
- •Academic Medical Center
- •Wound Complications
- •Preoperative Considerations
- •Perioperative Interventions
- •Long-Term Complications
- •Genitourinary Complications
- •Fertility Complications
- •Bowel Dysfunction
- •9: Anastomotic Construction
- •Introduction
- •Surgical Staplers
- •Handsewn Anastomoses
- •Compression Anastomoses
- •Tension
- •Blood Supply
- •Prophylactic Drainage
- •Diversion
- •High-Risk Anastomoses
- •Abdominal Anastomoses
- •Small Bowel Anastomoses
- •Ileocolic Anastomoses
- •Pelvic Anastomoses
- •Stapled Colorectal Anastomoses
- •Handsewn Colorectal Anastomosis
- •Ileorectal Anastomosis
- •Neorectal Reservoirs
- •Handsewn Coloanal Anastomosis
- •Unanticipated Pelvic Anastomosis
- •Inadequate Colonic Length
- •Intraoperative Anastomotic Failure
- •10: Anastomotic Complications
- •Anastomotic Leak
- •Overview
- •Consequences
- •Prevention
- •Diagnosis
- •Treatment
- •Anastomotic Stricture
- •Anastomotic Bleeding
- •Introduction
- •Patient History
- •Levator Syndrome
- •Physical Examination
- •Abdominal Examination
- •Inguinal Examination
- •Digital Rectal Examination
- •Conclusion
- •12: Hemorrhoids
- •Anatomy
- •Etiology
- •Epidemiology
- •Clinical Presentation
- •History
- •Physical Examination
- •Treatment
- •Medical Management
- •Dietary
- •Topical Therapies
- •Oral Therapy
- •Rubber Band Ligation
- •Infrared Photocoagulation
- •Sclerotherapy
- •Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy-Closed Technique
- •Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy Open Technique (Milligan-Morgan)
- •Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy (Circumferential or Whitehead)
- •Urinary Retention
- •Postoperative Hemorrhage
- •Anal Stenosis
- •Postoperative Infection
- •Fecal Incontinence
- •Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy
- •Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization
- •Special Clinical Scenarios
- •Thrombosed External Hemorrhoid
- •Pregnancy
- •Crohn’s Disease
- •Immunocompromised Patients
- •13: Anal Fissure
- •Pathogenesis
- •Non-operative Treatment
- •Healing Rates in Acute Anal Fissure
- •Healing Rates in Chronic Anal Fissure
- •Topical
- •Nitroglycerin
- •Calcium Channel Blockers
- •Botulinum Toxin Type A
- •Operative Treatment
- •Anal Dilation
- •Anal Sphincterotomy (Technique)
- •Outcomes Between Closed and Open Anal Sphincterotomy
- •Extent of Sphincterotomy
- •Fissurectomy
- •Results of Sphincterotomy
- •Fissures Without Anal Hypertonicity
- •Crohn’s Disease
- •Conclusions
- •Pathophysiology
- •Anatomy
- •Etiology
- •Evaluation
- •Physical Examination
- •Imaging
- •Computed Tomography (CT)
- •Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
- •Endoanal Ultrasound (EAUS)
- •Transperineal Sonography (TP-US)
- •Treatment
- •Catheter Drainage
- •Postoperative Management
- •Complications
- •Immediate Postoperative Period
- •Misdiagnosis
- •Special Considerations
- •Necrotizing Anorectal Infection (Fournier’s Gangrene)
- •Diagnosis
- •Treatment
- •Outcomes
- •Anal Fistula
- •Etiology
- •Diagnosis
- •Fistulography
- •Endoanal Ultrasound
- •Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •Treatment
- •Lay-Open Technique (Fistulotomy)
- •Setons
- •Advancement Flap
- •Technique
- •Technique
- •Fibrin Glue
- •Technique
- •Anal Fistula Plug
- •Technique
- •Novel Techniques
- •15: Complex Anorectal Fistulas
- •Introduction
- •Complex or Recurrent Cryptoglandular Fistulas
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Seton
- •Anal Flap
- •Anal Fistula Plug
- •Fibrin Glue
- •Outcomes
- •Seton
- •Advancement Flap
- •Anal Fistula Plug
- •Fibrin Glue
- •Rectourethral Fistulas
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Transanal Approach
- •Posterior Approach
- •Transperineal Approach
- •Transabdominal Approach
- •Outcome
- •Postoperative Fistulas
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Outcome
- •16: Rectovaginal Fistula
- •Obstetric Injury
- •Cryptoglandular Disease
- •Crohn’s Disease
- •Endorectal Repairs
- •Transperineal Repairs
- •Tissue Transposition Repairs
- •Martius Flap
- •Gracilis Muscle Transposition
- •Transvaginal Repairs
- •Transabdominal Repair
- •Alternate Repairs
- •Background
- •Etiology
- •Clinical Presentation/Diagnosis
- •Treatment
- •Non-operative Management
- •Operative/Excisional Management
- •Basic Procedures
- •Complex Procedures
- •Karydakis Flap
- •Cleft Lift Procedure (See Video 17.1)
- •Rhomboid/Limberg Flap (See Video 17.2)
- •Disease Recurrence
- •Hidradenitis Suppurativa
- •Etiology/Presentation/Diagnosis
- •Treatment
- •Medical Therapy
- •Surgical/Excisional Therapy
- •Introduction
- •Irritants
- •Steroid-Inducing Itching
- •Infectious
- •Dermatologic
- •Neoplasms
- •Anorectal Conditions
- •Systemic Diseases
- •Physical Examination
- •Infectious
- •Dermatologic
- •Neoplasms
- •Biochemical Testing
- •Microbiology Testing
- •Patch Testing
- •Anoscopy: Proctoscopy
- •Biopsy
- •Evidence-Based Management
- •Primary Prutitis Ani
- •Secondary Prutitis Ani
- •Infectious
- •Dermatologic
- •Systemic Diseases
- •19: Sexually Transmitted Infections
- •Introduction
- •Perianal or Genital Lesions
- •Proctitis
- •Proctocolitis
- •Enteritis
- •Gonorrhea
- •Epidemiology
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Emerging Antibiotic Resistance
- •Chlamydia
- •Epidemiology
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Lymphogranuloma Venereum
- •Epidemiology
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Treatment
- •Syphilis
- •Epidemiology
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Testing Recommendations
- •Treatment
- •Chancroid
- •Granuloma Inguinale aka Donovanosis
- •Herpes
- •Epidemiology
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Treatment
- •Human Papillomavirus
- •Epidemiology
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Testing
- •Treatment
- •Vaccine
- •Epidemiology
- •Testing
- •Anorectal Issues
- •Molluscum Contagiosum
- •Pubic Lice: Phthirus pubis
- •Scabies
- •20: Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia
- •Introduction
- •Symptoms
- •Epidemiology
- •Screening/Surveillance
- •Diagnosis
- •Treatment
- •Management Strategies
- •Progression
- •Prevention
- •21: Anal Cancer
- •Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- •Anal Melanoma
- •Anal Adenocarcinoma
- •22: Presacral Tumors
- •General Considerations
- •Anatomic Considerations
- •Diagnosis
- •Management
- •Outcomes
- •Chromosomal Instability
- •Microsatellite Instability
- •CpG Island Methylator Phenotype (CIMP)
- •Adenomatous Polyposis Syndromes
- •Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Underlying Genetics
- •Diagnosis
- •CRC Risk
- •FAP Extracolonic Manifestations
- •Management
- •Screening
- •Treatment
- •Colorectal
- •Duodenal Adenomas
- •Desmoid Disease
- •Thyroid Neoplasia
- •MUTYH-Associated Polyposis
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Underlying Genetics
- •Diagnosis
- •CRC Risk
- •Extracolonic Cancer Risk
- •Management
- •Screening
- •Treatment
- •Polymerase Proofreading-Associated Polyposis
- •Hamartomatous Polyposis Syndromes
- •Juvenile Polyposis Syndrome
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Underlying Genetics
- •Diagnosis
- •Management
- •Screening
- •Treatment
- •Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Underlying Genetics
- •Diagnosis
- •Management
- •Surveillance
- •Polypectomy
- •Surgery
- •PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome (PHTS)
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Underlying Genetics
- •Diagnosis
- •CRC Risk Management
- •Serrated Polyposis Syndrome (SPS)
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Underlying Genetics
- •Diagnosis
- •CRC Risk
- •Management
- •Screening
- •Treatment
- •Lynch Syndrome
- •Genotype-Phenotype Correlations
- •Muir-Torre Syndrome (MTS)
- •Turcot’s Syndrome
- •Colorectal Cancer Risk
- •Other LS-Associated Cancer Risk
- •Diagnosis
- •Individual Whose Family Meets Amsterdam Criteria but Does Not Have Any Clinical Phenotype
- •Clinical Management
- •Screening
- •Introduction
- •Recommended Screening Guidelines
- •Screening Cessation
- •Colonoscopy
- •Incomplete Colonoscopy
- •Complications
- •CT Colonography (CTC) or Virtual Colonoscopy
- •Flexible Sigmoidoscopy
- •Complications
- •Fecal Occult Blood Testing (FOBT)/Fecal Immunochemical Testing (FIT)
- •Stool DNA Testing
- •Double-Contrast Barium Enema (DCBE)
- •Surveillance
- •History
- •Adenoma
- •Hamartomas Polyps
- •Early Cancer (T1) Within Polyp
- •Chemoprevention
- •Background
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Preoperative Evaluation
- •Tumor Localization
- •Total Colon Evaluation
- •Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA)
- •Radiographic Evaluation
- •Lymph Node Evaluation
- •Lynch Syndrome Phenotype
- •26: The Surgical Management of Colon Cancer
- •Preoperative Preparation
- •Physiologic Assessment
- •Tumor Localization
- •Surgical Technique
- •Extent of Resection
- •Mesocolic Resection
- •Right Colectomy
- •Open Approach
- •Lateral-to-Medial Approach
- •Posterior (Inferior-to-Superior) Approach
- •Superior to Inferior Approach
- •Medial-to-Lateral Approach
- •Anastomosis
- •Laparoscopic Approach
- •Medial-to-Lateral Approach
- •Posterior (Inferior-to-Superior) Approach
- •Left Colectomy
- •Open
- •Anastomotic Assessment
- •Hand-Assisted Medial-to-Lateral Approach
- •Subtotal Colectomy
- •Open Approach
- •Laparoscopic Approach
- •Total Abdominal Colectomy with Ileorectal Anastomosis
- •Special Circumstances
- •Laparoscopy
- •Obstructing Colon Cancers
- •Perforated Colon Cancers
- •Management of Primary Colon Cancer in the Setting of Distant Metastasis
- •Outcomes for Colon Cancer
- •Short-Term Outcomes
- •Long-Term Outcomes
- •Introduction
- •Total Colon Evaluation
- •Locoregional Imaging
- •Computed Tomography
- •Endorectal Ultrasound
- •T Staging
- •N Staging
- •Magnetic Resonance
- •Whole-Body Imaging
- •Computed Tomography
- •Positron Emission Tomography (PET)
- •28: Rectal Cancer: Neoadjuvant Therapy
- •Introduction
- •Historical Context
- •Postoperative Radiotherapy
- •Preoperative Radiotherapy
- •Radiosensitizing Agents
- •Preoperative Versus Postoperative Radiation
- •Short- Versus Long-Course Preoperative Radiotherapy
- •Choosing Optimal Treatment Regimens
- •The European Approach
- •Selected Adjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy
- •Selective Nonoperative Management
- •Techniques
- •Results
- •Lymphovascular Invasion
- •Tumor Budding
- •Introduction
- •Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
- •31: Proctectomy
- •Pathological Assessment
- •Preoperative Preparation
- •Operative Approaches
- •Open Low Anterior Resection (LAR)
- •Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection
- •Robotic Low Anterior Resection
- •Abdominoperineal Resection (APR)
- •Extralevator or “Cylindrical” APR
- •Special Considerations
- •Distal Margin
- •Coloanal Anastomosis
- •Fecal Diversion
- •Extended Resection
- •Intraoperative Radiation Therapy
- •Flap Closure Following Abdominoperineal Resection
- •Functional Outcomes
- •Oncologic Outcomes
- •Multidisciplinary Rectal Cancer Care
- •32: Rectal Cancer Decision-Making
- •Assessment
- •Early Rectal Neoplasms
- •Local Excision
- •Endoscopically Excised Malignant Polyps
- •Surgical Considerations
- •Intraoperative Decisions
- •Midrectal Cancers
- •Low Rectal Cancers
- •Low Hartmann Resection Versus APR
- •Special Situations
- •Obstructing Rectal Cancer
- •Perforated Rectal Cancer
- •Synchronous Hepatic Metastases
- •33: Colorectal Cancer: Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy
- •Colon Cancer
- •Stage III Colon Cancer
- •Stage II Colon Cancer
- •Rectal Cancer
- •Patients Who Did Not Undergo Neoadjuvant Therapy
- •Patients Who Underwent Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy/Chemoradiotherapy
- •Patients Undergoing Local Excision
- •34: Colorectal Cancer: Surveillance After Curative-Intent Therapy
- •Introduction
- •Physical Examination
- •Laboratory Testing
- •Abdominal Imaging
- •Chest Imaging
- •Colonoscopy
- •Stage 1 Disease
- •Cost
- •Introduction
- •Determining Resectability
- •Multimodal Therapy Including Intraoperative Radiation
- •General Considerations
- •Recurrent Colon Cancer
- •Recurrent Rectal Cancer
- •Recurrences that Extend Anteriorly
- •Resection that Includes Sacrectomy
- •Stage I: Anterior Component
- •Stage II: Posterior Component
- •Stage III: Spinal Reconstructive Component
- •Soft Tissue Reconstruction
- •Recurrent Colon Cancer
- •Recurrent Rectal Cancer
- •Sacropelvic Resections
- •Palliative Approach
- •Introduction
- •Diagnostic Strategies
- •Computed Tomography
- •Positron Emission Tomography (PET)
- •Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
- •Biopsy
- •Multidisciplinary Evaluation
- •Surgical Emergency
- •Self-Expanding Intraluminal Metal Stents
- •Liver-First Strategy
- •Colon-First Strategy
- •Margin Status
- •Other Liver Metastasis Strategies: Hepatic Intra-arterial Chemotherapy/Chemoembolization
- •Pulmonary Metastasis
- •Peritoneal Metastasis
- •Ovarian Metastases
- •Bone
- •Brain
- •Pancreas
- •Adrenal
- •Retroperitoneal Lymph Nodes
- •37: Appendiceal Neoplasms
- •Introduction
- •Epidemiology
- •Epithelial Neoplasms
- •Neuroendocrine Appendiceal Lesions/Carcinoid Tumors
- •Goblet Cell Carcinoids
- •Clinical Features
- •Diagnostic Procedures
- •Medical Management
- •Appendectomy
- •Right Hemicolectomy

Endoscopy
KurtDavis andMichaelA.Valente
4
Key Concepts
• The endoscopic examination is critical for
patients with colorectal complaints and is a
key component of the complete colorectal
examination.
• The anoscopic examination is the best way to
adequately evaluate the anoderm and dentate
line and evaluate for internal and external
hemorrhoids and anal masses.
• Multiple bowel preparation regimens exist,
but regardless which prep is chosen, splitting
the timing into the half the day prior to and
half the day of the procedure results in a better
prep.
• There is no ideal sedation medication, but the
endoscopist must be familiar with the side
effect prole of any medications being used
and be prepared and comfortable with any
reversal agents.
• Adjunctive maneuvers employed with endoscopy serve as the markers between seasoned
experts and novices: these include abdominal
pressure, adjusting position, torqueing, and
dithering.
K. Davis (*)
Department of Surgery, Lousiana State University
Health School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
M. A. Valente
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease
Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
• PillCam endoscopy allows the clinician to
evaluate the small bowel for occult gastrointestinal bleeding, insipient tumors, polyposis
syndromes, or Crohn’s disease.
Introduction
• Endoscopic evaluation of the patient with
colorectal complaints allows the physician to
visually assess the intestinal tract and is key in
the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of
the effectiveness of any therapy.
The Complete Anorectal Examination
• While performing any examination, an anxiety-free and modest environment must be created. This can be accomplished by effective
communication, keeping the patient covered
as much as possible, keeping ancillary personnel in the room to a minimum, and not rushing
through the examination.
• The local examination is an important precursor to any endoscopic examination and consists of proper patient positioning, visual
inspection, and manual palpation of the
anorectal region followed by the digital rectal
examination.
© ASCRS (American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons) 2019
S. R. Steele et al. (eds.), The ASCRS Manual of Colon and Rectal Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01165-9_4
45

46
K. Davis and M. A. Valente
Patient Position
• The choice of patient position may depend on
several variables including available equipment, patient age and comorbid status, and
physician preference.
Prone Jackknife
• The prone jackknife position (knee-chest),
performed with the aid of a specialized proctoscopic table, is commonly employed and
allows for excellent visualization of the
entire anus and perianal and perineal region,
as well as the sacrococcygeal region
Fig. 4.1 Prone
jackknife position.
(Reprinted with
permission, Cleveland
Clinic Center for
Medical Art &
Photography ©2015. All
Rights Reserved)
(Fig.4.1). The table is angled forward gradually so that the patient’s buttocks and
perineum are superior, while the head and
feet are inferior.
Left Lateral
• The left lateral recumbent (Sims’) position is
if a specialty bed is not readily available
(Fig. 4.2) and is well suited for elderly or
debilitated patients. The patient lies on their
left side, the thighs are exed as to form a
90-degree angle with the trunk, and the buttocks project slightly beyond the edge of the
examining table.

4 Endoscopy
Fig. 4.2 Left lateral
(Sims’) position.
(Reprinted with
permission, Cleveland
Clinic Center for
Medical Art &
Photography ©2015. All
Rights Reserved)
47
Inspection andPalpation
• Proper stepwise visual inspection of the
perineum, anal canal, rectum, and vagina
should precede any other examination.
Proper lighting is essential. It is more proper
to delineate – exam ndings should be
described using anatomical location using
the cardinal quadrants (i.e., left lateral, right
anterior, right posterior) as opposed to a
clockface description.
• A great deal of information can be gained
from visualization, and gentle spreading of
the buttocks provides proper exposure.
• The patient is asked to strain (Valsalva maneuver) to help determine and assess for perineal
descent and uterine, vaginal, bladder, or rectal
prolapse.
• Palpation of the anorectal region also gives the
examiner a great detail of information. Gently
touching the anal verge will elicit the anocutaneous reex (anal wink), which is indicative
of an intact pudendal nerve.
Spreading of the anus will help elicit an anal
ssure or ulceration. Palpation of the gluteal
region can help identify an abscess, external
opening of a stulous tract, or possibly a mass.
Digital Rectal Examination
• Digital rectal examination (DRE) provides information regarding potential pathology of the anal
canal, distal rectum, and adjacent organs, as well
as an assessment of the neurological function of
the muscles of fecal continence.

48
K. Davis and M. A. Valente
• There are relative contraindications to performing this portion of the exam such as painful lesions.
• The keys to a successful DRE can be summarized by simple rules: adequate lubrication,
gentleness, and attention to detail.
• After proper communication with the patient,
a well-lubricated index nger is placed across
the anus to lubricate the general area. The ngertip is then gently inserted into the anal
opening. If the patient’s response is an involuntary spasm of the internal sphincter, the
examiner should withdraw their ngertip and
gently try again. Ask the patient to bear down
as to pass a stool, which causes relaxation of
the entire sphincter complex and should facilitate an easy digital insertion.
• The distal rectum and anal canal along with
surrounding structures should be investigated
in an organized and stepwise fashion. Resting
anal tone followed by squeeze tone should be
assessed. Assessment should be made of the
entire circumference of the lumen by gently
sweeping around the entire anus and distal
rectum.
• Anteriorly in a male, the prostate should be
palpated.
• In the female, anteriorly palpate for a
rectocele.
• Posteriorly, the presence of a presacral (retrorectal) mass may be palpated.
• Redundant rectal mucosa may be palpated as
well as a stricture or narrowing. Induration or
a brous cord, representing an internal stulous opening, may also be felt on DRE.The
patient should be asked to perform a Valsalva
maneuver to potentially bring any lesions of
the upper rectum or the rectosigmoid into the
examiners reach.
• If a mass is palpated, it’s size, position, characteristics (sessile, polypoid, ulcerated),
mobility (mobile, tethered, xed), and relationship to other structures (distance from the
anal verge, distance for the anorectal ring)
must be accurately recorded.
• The levator ani/puborectalis muscles can also
be assessed on DRE with evaluation of both
the strength and function of these muscles,
along with any tenderness on direct palpation.
When a patient with good sphincter function
is asked to squeeze these muscles, the examiner’s nger will feel the muscle tighten.
• Additionally, when the examiner pulls posteriorly on these muscles, the anal opening should
gape and then return to normal, representing
an intact reex pathway to the thoracolumbar
spinal cord.
• Immediately prior to any of the endoscopic
procedures described below, a DRE should be
performed.
Anoscopy/Proctoscopy
• The anorectal examination may be followed
with some component of an endoscopic investigation to complete the workup. This may
include anoscopy, proctoscopy, or exible
endoscopy.
• It should be noted that the term proctoscopy
will be used as to describe the rigid scope
implemented to evaluate the rectum and the
distal sigmoid colon. Therefore, “rigid proctosigmoidoscope” or “proctosigmoidoscopy”
will be referred to as “rigid proctoscopy” or
“proctoscopy.” Sigmoidoscopy refers to the
use of the exible sigmoidoscope.
Anoscopy
• Anoscopy is the best way to adequately evaluate the anoderm, dentate line, internal and
external hemorrhoids, papillae, ssures, anal
masses, and distal rectal mucosa.
• The anoscope is a relatively simple instrument
consisting of an obturator, the scope itself, and
a light source (Fig.4.3).
• The anoscope (with obturator in place) is liberally lubricated and gently and gradually
advanced until the instrument is fully inserted
along the anterior-posterior axis of the anus.
• After successful insertion, the obturator is
removed and examination of the anorectum
undertaken. The obturator should then be reinserted while the scope still in the anus, and the

4 Endoscopy
Fig. 4.3 Various beveled anoscopes. From top to bottom:
large Hirschman (short bevel), Buie-Hirschman anoscope
(long bevel), small (pediatric) Hirschman anoscope
anoscope is gently rotated to examine a new
area.
• During the examination, the patient is asked to
strain while the anoscope is withdrawn to
visualize any prolapsing anorectal mucosa or
hemorrhoidal tissue.
• During the anoscopic examination, hemorrhoids may be banded, or biopsies of any suspicious lesions may be obtained.
• Complications of anoscopy are rare but may
include occasional bleeding from hemorrhoids or inadvertently tearing the anoderm.
49
or cotton-tipped swabs can be used to remove
any endoluminal debris or uid or to enhance
visualization (Fig.4.4).
• Proctoscopes are 25 cm in length with three
available luminal diameters (Fig.4.5).
– Disposable plastic and self-lighted procto-
scopes are available.
• The procedure can be performed in either the
prone jackknife or left lateral position as previously described. Pain may occur with
stretching of the rectosigmoid mesentery due
to over insufation of air or the scope hitting
the rectal wall.
• Proctoscopy use has declined but is still
used in the identication and precise localization of rectal lesions or in the evaluation
of rectal bleeding. Contraindications are
Fig. 4.4 Proctoscopy suction catheter and long cottontipped applicators for clearing small amounts of fecal
debris. The cotton-tipped swabs are also used for manipulating the rectal and anal mucosa during anoscopy and
proctoscopy
Proctoscopy
• Rigid proctoscopy is suitable to examine the
rectum, and in some patients, the distal sigmoid colon may also be evaluated. The patient
should receive an enema preparation prior to
the procedure.
• The proctoscope consists of an obturator, the
scope itself, and a light source. A lens is attached
to the external orice of the scope after the obturator is removed. A bellows is attached to the
scope allowing for insufation of air to gain better visualization and negotiation of the scope
proximally through the rectum. A suction device
Fig. 4.5 Proctoscopes. From top to bottom: large proctoscope, length 25cm, diameter 19 mm; standard proctoscope, length 25 cm, diameter 15 mm; pediatric
proctoscope, length 25cm, diameter 11mm

50
K. Davis and M. A. Valente
Fig. 4.6 Turrell-angulated biopsy forceps. A curved
upper jaw allows for 360-degree rotation. A variety of jaw
sizes and types are available
similar to anoscopy and include painful
anorectal conditions.
• After adequate lubrication, while the obturator is
held in place with the right thumb, the instrument
is gently inserted into the anal canal and advanced
approximately 4–5cm in the general direction of
the umbilicus. The scope is then aimed toward
the sacrum and advanced for an additional
4–5cm. The obturator is then removed, and the
viewing lens is placed. Minimal air insufation is
used in order to open the bowel lumen, and gently withdrawing and advancing the scope to
straighten out angulations proximally aid in
achieving successful navigation.
• The proximal extent reached on proctoscopic
examinations averages approximately
17–20 cm and very rarely can the scope be
inserted to its full length.
• The proctoscope is withdrawn and the mucosal surface is examined. Description of any
lesions found includes size of the lesion, the
exact distance from the anal verge, appearance, and location on the bowel wall.
• Several different types of biopsy forceps are
available (Fig.4.6), and biopsies can be done
in the ofce setting with or without the use of
electrocautery. Additionally, polyps or small
lesions can be snared (Fig.4.7) or fulgurated.
Proper suction, electrocautery, and irrigation
devices should be readily available in the
examining room for these purposes (Fig.4.8).
• Serious complications during rigid proctoscopy are rare and include bleeding and
perforation.
Fig. 4.7 Rigid-wire (Frankfelt) snare. This snare allows
for polypectomy or tumor debulking via the anoscope or
proctoscope
Fig. 4.8 Suction catheter/electrocoagulation catheter.
From top to bottom: an insulated catheter for combining
suction and electrocautery and an electrocoagulation
catheter
Anal andRectal Ultrasound
• Endoanal ultrasonography (EUS) is an imaging modality that provides information on the
anatomy and function of pelvic oor structures, anorectal disease processes, and anorectal tumors.
• Advantages of EUS include the relatively
inexpensive cost to perform and its widespread
availability. A disadvantage of EUS is that it is
an operator-dependent test.
• Circumferential assessment of the anal canal
and distal rectum is made possible by a
360-degree rotating transducer that is either a
7 or 10 megahertz (MHz) probe for twodimensional (2D) units or a 13MHz probe for
three-dimensional (3D) units (Fig.4.9).

4 Endoscopy
Fig. 4.9 B-K Medical (Herlev, Denmark) three-dimensional anorectal ultrasound equipment
51
Fig. 4.10 Two-dimensional endoanal ultrasound view of
the U-shaped puborectalis muscle (PR). IASinternal anal
sphincter
• Patients receive an enema prior to testing
which is most commonly performed with the
patient in the left lateral recumbent
position.
• The well-lubricated ultrasound probe is
inserted and slowly advanced and then withdrawn to view the entire area of the anal
canal/rectum (in modern systems, a crystal
moves up and down along the transducer to
acquire images while the probe is held
stationarily).
• The anal canal is divided into three levels on
EUS.
• The upper anal canal is dened by the
U-shaped puborectalis muscle.
• The middle canal has both EAS and IAS muscles visible (this is also where the IAS is at
maximum width).
• The lower anal canal has only the most distal
external sphincter bers (Figs.4.10, 4.11, and
4.12).
• Highly reective tissue on EUS reveals a
hyperechoic (white) image, while poorly
reective tissues are hypoechoic (black).
Fig. 4.11 Two-dimensional ultrasound from the midanal canal. This ultrasound image represents normal,
intact internal anal sphincter (IAS) (hypoechoic) and
external anal sphincter (EAS) (hyperechoic)
• The smooth muscle-based IAS, which has
higher water content, shows up black on
EUS.In post-obstetrical sphincter injuries, the
defect is usually located anteriorly and
encompasses the EAS and may involve the
IAS as well (Fig.4.13).
• The accuracy of EUS compared to surgical
ndings has been reported to be as high as
90%–100%.

52
Fig. 4.12 Threedimensional coronal
view of the upper,
middle, and lower anal
canal. EASexternal anal
sphincter, IASinternal
anal sphincter
K. Davis and M. A. Valente
Fig. 4.13 Anteriorly located defect of both the EAS and
IAS in the mid-anal canal
Flexible Endoscopy
Flexible Endoscopic Insertion Techniques
• The techniques described here are generalizations and guidelines to help navigate the exible endoscope to its completion.
Torque
• The twisting motion applied to the shaft of the
scope by the endoscopist’s right hand is called
torque (Fig.4.14). Torque is an essential technique that allows for a stiffening of the scope
and alters the direction in which the tip deection controls the work.
Tip Deection
• The tip of the endoscope should always be kept
in the middle of the bowel lumen. The techniques of torque, pull/push, and dithering-jiggle will tend to move the tip in several
directions. The endoscopist should bring the
tip back by controlling both the outer and inner
controls with their left hand. With practice, the
endoscopist should be able to control and use
both tip deection control knobs in different
directions with only the thumb of the left hand.
Dithering/Jiggle
• The rapid up-and-down, side-to-side, and toand-fro movements of the shaft of the scope

4 Endoscopy
Fig. 4.14 Torque– a
twisting motion of the
endoscopist’s right hand
to the left
(counterclockwise) or
right (clockwise).
(Reprinted with
permission, Cleveland
Clinic Center for
Medical Art &
Photography ©2015. All
Rights Reserved)
Fig. 4.15 Jiggle
(dithering)– rapid
side-to-side, up-anddown, and to-and-fro
movements of the
endoscope in order to
pleat or “accordion” the
colon onto the scope’s
shaft. (Reprinted with
permission, Cleveland
Clinic Center for
Medical Art &
Photography ©2015. All
Rights Reserved)
53
are referred to as dithering or jiggle (Fig.4.15).
This technique can be combined with torqueing as well as in and out movements of the
scope. The object of this important maneuver
is to pleat the colon onto the shaft of the endoscope in order to shorten the colon and to keep
the scope straight.
Aspiration ofAir andBreath Holding
• As insufation of air accumulates during the
procedure, the colon becomes distended and
elongates. The judicious and cautious use of
air is important during the examination, but
thoughtful and calculated aspiration/suction
of air is an important adjunct insertion
technique.
• Another technique to help the scope around
the exure is the “breath-hold” maneuver.
While negotiating difcult turns and bends
(especially the hepatic and splenic exure),
have the patient take a deep breath in and hold
it. This causes the diaphragm to drop and
pushes the exures over the scope and thereby
allows the scope to pass.

54
Fig. 4.16 Slide-by
technique. The
colonoscope is blindly
pushed around a bend,
guided by the curve of
the scope and the
curvature of the bowel
wall. Slide-by should be
terminated with
excessive patient pain or
blanching of the mucosa
occurs. This technique
should be avoided in
diseased bowel or in the
presence of diverticuli.
(Reprinted with
permission, Cleveland
Clinic Center for
Medical Art &
Photography ©2015. All
Rights Reserved)
K. Davis and M. A. Valente
Slide-By
• The technique of pushing blindly into a turn or
bend with maximum tip deection and without full visualization of the colon lumen to
guide the scope along the curvature of the
bowel wall to advance the scope past the turn
is termed a slide-by technique. This controversial technique should never be used by unsupervised trainees or novice endoscopists due
to the risk of perforation. It should be terminated if there is resistance to forward advancement or the mucosa becomes blanched at the
tip of the scope (Fig.4.16).
Adjunctive Maneuvers forMore
Dicult Examinations
• The adjunctive maneuvers employed with
endoscopy often serve as the markers between
seasoned experts and novices. There are several
different maneuvers including abdominal pressure and other external manipulations provided
by an assistant under the direct supervision of
the endoscopist. In addition it is possible to
adjust the position of the patient to either the
supine or prone positions. There are also commercially produced overtubes, which are seldom required now with the advent of adjustable
stiffness endoscopes. All of these adjunctive
maneuvers are designed to reduce the loop formation of the endoscope or to prevent it from
reforming once it has been reduced. In one
study evaluating the use of ancillary techniques,
directed abdominal pressure was used in 56%
of colonoscopies, while turning to the left and
right was performed in 17 and 23% of exams,
respectively. (7) Like all techniques, however,
they are best learned under the supervision of a
seasoned endoscopist.
• The most likely cause of a difcult examination is the formation of a loop, which makes
further advancement of the scope impossible,
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
