Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_636_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
62 Мб
Скачать
138
K. Umanskiy and N. Hyman
Treatment
• Factors to be considered when deciding on the appropriate management for a patient with an anastomotic leak include patient-specic fac­tors (hemodynamic derangement, physiologic reserve, nutritional status, comorbid compli­cations, initial surgical indications/goals) and features of the leak (location, size of the defect, presence of concomitant tissue ischemia).
• Perhaps the most useful classication in out­lining the principles of management is early versus late presentation.
• Patients with an early leak classically present in the rst week after surgery with signs and symptoms of peritonitis, organ dysfunction associated with sepsis, and hemodynamic instability.
• In this clinical setting, prompt return to the operating room is required (Fig.10.2).
• Patients with an anastomotic leak often pres­ent with signs and symptoms that lead the sur­geon astray and suggest other serious postoperative complications (e.g., pulmonary embolism, myocardial ischemia).
• If the diagnosis is established in the rst few days after the initial surgery, most patients will require operative exploration.
• Intravenous antibiotics and close observation may be appropriate in a few highly selected patients with small, contained leaks that other-
Fig. 10.2 Diffuse peritonitis after major anastomotic disruption
wise appear reasonably well (low colorectal anastomosis, especially if they have a proxi­mal diversion).
• At re-operative surgery, the peritoneal cavity is thoroughly irrigated and appropriate cul­tures obtained.
• In general, patients with a small bowel to small bowel or ileocolic anastomosis are best treated with resection and repeat anastomosis.
• Patients who are hemodynamically unstable may be treated with an ileostomy and end­loop stoma, where the distal end is brought out through the same aperture as the ileostomy (Fig.10.3a–c).
• Anastomosis with proximal loop ileostomy is another alternative to address this situation where primary anastomosis alone is deemed unwise.
• When a colocolic anastomosis breaks down, dividing the anastomosis and creating an end colostomy is usually the most appropriate option.
• Resection with anastomosis and proximal loop ileostomy is an option for hemodynami­cally stable patients.
• Leak after low anterior resection creates challenging management decisions. If the anastomosis is divided and a colostomy cre­ated, then subsequent attempts for another low pelvic anastomosis may be a formidable endeavor.
• When there is no ischemia and the leak is rela­tively small and contained, loop ileostomy and drainage of the anastomosis are usually most appropriate.
• In stable patients with major disruptions, resection with anastomosis and proximal diversion may also be an option.
• The management of anastomotic leaks diag­nosed beyond the rst week to 10days post­operatively usually differs in many important regards from its earlier counterpart.
• Careful imaging including a CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis with intravenous and enteric (including rectal) contrast is typically the key to diagnosis and treatment planning.
• Re-operative surgery is usually unnecessary and will quite often make things worse.
10 Anastomotic Complications
139
a
b
c
Fig. 10.3 End-loop stoma. (a) The bowel is divided, and each end is brought up through the opening. (b) The prox­imal portion is completely matured, while the distal end
• Most patients with late presentations are most often best managed by patience, antibiotics, and percutaneous drainage.
• Both covered stents and vacuum-assisted devices have been used with anecdotal success.
• Nutritional support, using the enteral route whenever possible, should not be neglected.
has only a corner matured. (c) Side and top view of the matured stoma

Anastomotic Stricture

• Anastomotic stricture is a relatively common complication of colorectal or pouch-anal anastomosis, occurring in 3% to 30% of cases.
• The exact pathophysiology underlying anas­tomotic strictures remains unknown, but
140
K. Umanskiy and N. Hyman
ba
Fig. 10.4 (a) Colorectal anastomotic stricture, before dilation. (b) Anastomosis after through the scope balloon dilation
ischemia, incomplete “doughnuts” from sta­pled anastomotic reconstruction, anastomotic leakage, hemorrhage, and radiotherapy are probably contributing factors.
• Symptoms most commonly associated with rectal strictures are increasing constipation and partial large bowel obstruction.
• Asymptomatic patients with a stricture and diverting stoma can be identied based on digital rectal examination or upon radio­graphic or endoscopic evaluation prior to stoma reversal.
• Diagnosis is typically made by imaging (i.e., contrast enema) or endoscopically—the inabil­ity to pass a 12-mm-diameter sigmoidoscope through the anastomotic narrowing.
• Luchtefeld found that stenosis was diag­nosed at 1–6months after surgery in 54% of patients and at more than 6months after sur­gery in 14%.
• Recurrent cancer must be considered as a cause of stricture prior to deciding on the treatment approach.
• Short strictures in low colorectal, coloanal, and ileoanal pouch anastomoses can be treated by simple digital dilation or Hegar dilators with a low rate of restenosis.
• Endoscopic balloon dilatation is the most commonly used method for treatment of short (<1 cm) colonic and colorectal anastomotic
strictures (Fig. 10.4a, b) with success rates that range from 86% to 97%.
• A less frequently used method of bougie dila­tion of anastomotic stricture is accomplished by the radial vector of an axially directed force.
• In a case study, Pietropaolo found balloon dilation more effective than bougie dilation with respect to the proportion of patients suc­cessfully treated in a single session (76.9% vs.
51.8%).
• Recurrent cicatricle strictures may be treated with the combination of incision plus balloon dilation or endoscopic stricturotomy with neo­dymium-yttrium aluminum garnet laser.
• Complications of electrocautery and laser strictureplasty are very low, with only one group reporting a 2.7% technical failure rate.
• Alternatively, transanal endoscopic microsur­gical approach (TEM) strictureplasty with electrocautery or laser can be used.
• Anastomotic strictures that are irregular, markedly angulated, xed, or longer than 1–2 cm in length may not be amenable to endoscopic treatment.
• Re-operative rectal dissection in the presence of scarring from previous operations or from ongoing local sepsis is technically demanding and should not be underestimated.
• Shleigel reported a series of 27 patients who underwent surgical correction of anastomotic
10 Anastomotic Complications
141
stenosis (7 colorectal anastomoses for upper rectal anastomotic strictures and 20 coloanal anastomoses for middle and lower rectal stric­tures). Intestinal continuity was restored in all cases.
• In long segment distal rectal strictures or after failure of local therapy, immediate or delayed coloanal anastomosis through a combined abdominal and perineal approach is recommended.
• A less invasive technique using an end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) stapler may be applied to correct mid- to proximal rectal strictures with or without laparotomy. Prior to stapling, the rectal anastomotic stricture is dilated and assessed by rigid sigmoidoscopy. Long-term results following this technique of stricture resection have been reported as 89–100% return to normal bowel function with a mean follow-up of 12–49months.
• Self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) have been considered for medium-term symptom relief for recalcitrant benign colorectal stric­tures in patients who are otherwise unt for surgery. They associated with a delayed com­plication rate of 38% of cases.
• Diverting ileostomy or colostomy may be the only available treatment option in some cases.

Anastomotic Bleeding

• Anastomotic bleeding following stapled colorectal, colonic, or intestinal anastomosis is usually self-limited complication occurring in up to 5% of anastomoses.
• The risk of postoperative bleeding can be decreased by avoiding the inclusion of meso­colon into the staple line.
• We recommend intraoperative assessment of colorectal anastomoses with intraoperative
exible sigmoidoscopy where an actively bleeding vessel can be visualized and immedi­ate hemostasis achieved by placement sutures under direct inspection, endoscopic injection of 1:200,000 epinephrine, or careful coagulation.
• The optimal treatment choices depend on the site of bleeding, patient factors, and skill of the surgeon or endoscopist.
• Postoperative anastomotic bleeding usually occurs in the rst 9days.
• Initial management includes correction of any associated coagulopathy and transfusion of blood and blood products if necessary.
• Between 2 and 10units of packed red blood cells may be required in the nonoperative treatment of anastomotic bleeding, and hypo­thermia should be avoided.
• For persistent bleeding, colonoscopy allows for direct inspection of the anastomosis and potentially for treatment.
• Submucosal peri-anastomotic injection of up to 10ml of 1:200000 epinephrine in saline has been shown to result in control of anastomotic bleeding.
• Cirocco reported the successful use of electro­coagulation (anastomotic stula that devel­oped in one of six cases may have been related to this technique).
• Endoscopic application of clips is an excellent alternative to coagulation and has been shown to be safe and effective in control of anasto­motic bleeding.
• Briskly bleeding anastomoses may be amena­ble to angiographic localization and emboliza­tion but with the risk of bowel ischemia or infarction by interrupting the distal arterial blood supply.
• Although extremely rare, signicant anasto­motic bleeding after large bowel resection can be severe enough to require reoperation with surgi­cal revision or reconstruction of anastomosis.
Part II
Anorectal Disease
Approach toAnal Pain
AmirL.Bastawrous
11
Key Concepts
• A careful history should direct the diagnosis for patients with anal pain.
• A considerate yet thorough physical exam will usually establish the diagnosis by visualizing pathology or by palpating abnormalities. If not possible in the ofce, then an exam under anesthesia should be performed.
• Imaging is rarely needed to determine the etiology.
• An anal ssure will typically cause sharp anal pain during and after a hard bowel movement.
• The anal pain associated with a thrombosed external hemorrhoid is usually constant and accompanied by a palpable swelling but with­out systemic signs of infection.
• Cancer should always be included in the dif­ferential diagnosis.

Introduction

• Anal and rectal pathologies can be inconve­nient and are commonly debilitating.
• Anal pain is a symptom which encompasses a broad spectrum of diagnoses from the benign and self-limited to the neoplastic and life-threatening.
A. L. Bastawrous (*) Swedish Cancer Institute, Swedish Colon and Rectal Clinic, Seattle, WA, USA e-mail: amir.bastawrous@swedish.org

Patient History

• An experienced colorectal surgeon can often surmise the patient’s diagnosis prior to any examination just by listening to key descrip­tions by the patient.
• Pain characteristics are important [duration, location (intra-anal, external), character (burn­ing, sharp, dull), causative agents (bowel movement, diarrhea, hard stool, exercise, fecal incontinence, drainage), associated signs and symptoms (fever, chills, weight loss, change in bowel habits), and items that provide any relief (warm water bath, bowel movement, topical creams)].
• Elements of the patient history can provide some guidance:
– Diabetes may suggest an anal abscess or
Fournier’s gangrene.
– Inammatory bowel disease may hint at an
anal ssures, stulae, or abscess.
– Iniximab or etanercept use may point to
psoriasis as a cause for pruritus.
– Family history of colorectal cancer may
lead to consideration to rule out rectal cancer.
– Anoreceptive intercourse may raise the
concern about sexually communicable infectious diseases, anal dysplasia, or anal cancer.
© ASCRS (American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons) 2019 S. R. Steele et al. (eds.), The ASCRS Manual of Colon and Rectal Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01165-9_11
145
146
• Finally, one should not be misled by either the patient’s or referring physician’s working diagnosis, which is often inaccurate.
Anal Fissure (Fig.11.1)
• Patients typically describe sharp, “knifelike,” during and immediately after a bowel movement.
• The pain may last for minutes or hours after passing stool.
• Spotting of blood on the toilet paper after wip­ing or dripping into the bowl is common.
Acutely Thrombosed External Hemorrhoid (Figs.11.2 and11.3)
• Patients describe sharp, constant pain follow­ing straining (either with a bowel movement (loose or constipated) or lifting something heavy).
• The pain will coincide with a “bulge” they feel near the anal opening.
• The pain will last all day, usually increasing gradually, and then decrease over the week.
A. L. Bastawrous
Fig. 11.2 Acutely thrombosed external hemorrhoid
Fig. 11.1 Anal ssure
Fig. 11.3 Hemorrhoidal crisis
11 Approach toAnal Pain
Perianal, Perirectal, or Ischiorectal Abscess (Fig.11.4)
• Their history is one of the gradually worsen­ing pressures and pain.
• The pain is constant but worse before and dur­ing a bowel movement.
• They will typically describe fever and chills.
• These patients often refuse to sit due to the pain.
• There can be some similarity of symptoms with patients who have a thrombosed external hemorrhoid, but the primary difference in pre­senting symptoms is the presence of systemic symptoms of infection.
• Inability to urinate is a rarely associated com­plaint, seen most commonly with large abscesses.
Pruritus Ani (Fig.11.5)
• The pain can be described as pain but is often claried to be burning or itching, with some overlap.
• The irritation is nearly universally chronic in nature, occurring in ares and cycles.
147
Fig. 11.5 Pruritus ani
Levator Syndrome
• A lack of tting into a typical pain pattern often makes the diagnosis challenging.
• The pain may be sharp, dull, burning, or achy.
Fig. 11.6 Anal squamous cell carcinoma
• It may be intermittent or constant, may improve with warm water baths, or may be worsened or improved with bowel movement.
• Often the pain is chronic and worse late in the day.
• Some will complain of difculty with evacua­tion of stools.
Anal or Rectal Cancer (Fig.11.6)
• The majority of patients who present with anal pain have benign processes; however, the alert physician will always consider cancer within the differential diagnosis.
• Anal and rectal cancers can present with pain, often with concurrent bleeding and/or change in bowel habits.Fig. 11.4 Perianal abscess
148
• Anal cancer can present more subtly with symptoms overlapping with those of anal s­sure with pain during and after a bowel move­ment along with spotting of blood on the toilet paper.
• There may or may not be an associated mass felt by the patient.

Physical Examination

A. L. Bastawrous
• The regional high yield focus of the examina­tion includes the abdomen; inguinal, perianal skin and soft tissue; buttocks and gluteal cleft; and anal canal and rectum.
Abdominal Examination
• Anal pathology can on occasion manifest with abdominal ndings.
• An obstructing cancer can cause distention or alteration of bowel sounds.
• Metastases can present with hepatomegaly.
• Crohn’s disease patients may be very thin and cachectic if they have both anal disease and bowel manifestations.
Inguinal Examination
• The inguinal examination may identify ade­nopathy in the setting of low rectal adenocarcinoma or anal canal and anal margin squamous cell carcinomas.
• This exam nding has implications for radio­therapy mapping and surveillance of disease regression or recurrence.
Perianal, Gluteal, andIntergluteal Examination
• Patients will appreciate a careful description of the exam as it is performed and an explana­tion of ndings along the way.
Fig. 11.7 Anal stula
Fig. 11.8 Anal stricture
• Visual examination of the perianal skin includes color, scaly skin, thickened folds, masses, secondary openings of stula-in-ano (Fig.11.7), evidence of abscess with swelling or redness, skin tags, and external hemorrhoid enlargement.
• Anal ssure can be diagnosed by visualizing the anoderm with gentle retraction of the but­tocks to evert the anoderm and expose the ssure.
• In the intergluteal cleft, look for sinuses, abscess, and pilonidal pits.
• Anal stenosis can be seen in some patients after anal surgery (Fig.11.8).
• The rare subcutaneous mass may be benign or malignant; an assessment of size, xation, character, rmness, and tenderness is some­times helpful in establishing the diagnosis (Fig.11.9).
11 Approach toAnal Pain
Fig. 11.9 Solitary brous tumor
149
Anorectal Inspection, Anoscopy, andSigmoidoscopy
• An anoscopic examination should be per­formed to identify intra-anal lesions.
• A sigmoidoscopic should be performed to identify rectal lesions.
• Lesions including hemorrhoids, polyps, masses, mucosal inammation, and rare anal melanoma may be seen (Fig.11.10).
Imaging andDiagnostic Testing
• Following the history and examination, one may need to gather additional diagnostic imaging studies:
– CT of the pelvis (mass, pain, or abscess) – Cine-videodefecogram or dynamic MRI of
the pelvis (proctalgia fugax or other pelvic oor disorders)

Digital Rectal Examination

• One should feel for any abnormal anal or dis­tal rectal masses and anal tone:
– If low resting tone, stool seepage may be a
cause for pruritus pain.
– If tone is high and there is twitching of the
anal sphincter, even if there is no visible ssure, a diagnosis of anal ssure disease is likely.
• The tightness of levator muscles should be assessed bilaterally starting at the coccyx; this will often reproduce the pain or pressure of levator spasm.
• The sacral hollow should be examined for pre­sacral masses or cysts.
• The coccyx should be distracted/palpated to assess for coccydynia.
• The prostate should be palpated since prostati­tis may be the cause of anal pain.
• If the pain is too intense and the patient cannot tolerate the exam in the ofce setting, an examination under anesthesia should be sched­uled in the proper clinical circumstances.
Fig. 11.10 Anal melanoma