Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5191_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
68 Мб
Скачать
3 Ischemia/Reperfusion: APotential Cause ofTissue Necrosis
19
Table 3.2 Examples of prevention in IRI-related tissue and skin necrosis—result from clinical trials
Non­IRI models
Acute limb ischemia Free-ap IV lidocaine [38], IV
Abbreviations: IV intravenous; NPWT negative-pressure wound therapy; RIC remote ischemic conditioning
Pharmacological treatments
IV mannitol [31], IV antioxidative vitamin [32]
arginine [39], preconditioning with sevourane [40]
pharmacological
treatments
Controlled
reperfusion
[3336], RIC [37]
RIC [41, 42],
NPWT [43]
3.5 Conclusion andFuture Research
Musculoskeletal tissue IRI can result in local effects ranging from tissue edema to necrosis, leading to systemic effects such as remote organ injury to multi-organ failure. The pathogenesis of IRI is a consequence of cellular oxidative stress and inammatory responses. To prevent IRI, investigators try to block the injuries by remedi­ating oxidative stress and inammation. Several interventions in the form of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments can prevent tis­sue necrosis from IRI.

References

1. Dorweiler B, Pruefer D, Andrasi TB, Maksan SM, Schmiedt W, Neufang A, etal. Ischemia-reperfusion injury: pathophysiology and clinical implications. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2007;33(6):600–12.
2. Apichartpiyakul P, Shinlapawittayatorn K, Rerkasem K, Chattipakorn SC, Chattipakorn N. Mechanisms and interventions on acute lower limb ischemia/reper­fusion injury: a review and insights from cell to clini­cal investigations. Ann Vasc Surg. 2022;86:452–81.
3. Hammersen F, Barker JH, Gidlöf A, Menger MD, Hammersen E, Messmer K. The ultrastructure of microvessels and their contents following ischemia and reperfusion. 1989.
4. Petrasek PF, Walker PM.A clinically relevant small­animal model of skeletal muscle ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Investig Surg. 1994;7(1):27–38.
5. Kuroda Y, Togashi H, Uchida T, Haga K, Yamashita A, Sadahiro M. Oxidative stress evaluation of skel­etal muscle in ischemia-reperfusion injury using
enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):10863.
6. Hollander MR, de Waard GA, Konijnenberg LS, Meijer-van Putten RM, van den Brom CE, Paauw N, et al. Dissecting the effects of ischemia and reper­fusion on the coronary microcirculation in a rat model of acute myocardial infarction. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0157233.
7. Ames A 3rd, Wright RL, Kowada M, Thurston JM, Majno G, Cerebral ischemia. II.The no-reow phe­nomenon. Am J Pathol. 1968;52(2):437–53.
8. Hardy SC, Homer-Vanniasinkam S, Gough MJ.The triphasic pattern of skeletal muscle blood ow in reperfusion injury: an experimental model with impli­cations for surgery on the acutely ischaemic lower limb. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1990;4(6):587–90.
9. Forrest I, Lindsay T, Romaschin A, Walker P.The rate and distribution of muscle blood ow after prolonged ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 1989;10(1):83–8.
10. Celoria G, Zarfos K, Berman J.Effects of acute lower limb ischemia on femoral venous efux. Angiology. 1990;41(6):439–44.
11. Hayashi M, Hirose H, Sasaki E, Senga S, Murakawa S, Mori Y, etal. Evaluation of ischemic damage in the skeletal muscle with the use of electrical properties. J Surg Res. 1998;80(2):266–71.
12. Lejay A, Meyer A, Schlagowski AI, Charles AL, Singh F, Bouitbir J, etal. Mitochondria: mitochondrial par­ticipation in ischemia-reperfusion injury in skeletal muscle. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2014;50:101–5.
13. Youle RJ, van der Bliek AM.Mitochondrial ssion, fusion, and stress. Science. 2012;337(6098):1062–5.
14. Chambers DE, Parks DA, Patterson G, Roy R, McCord JM, Yoshida S, etal. Xanthine oxidase as a source of free radical damage in myocardial ischemia. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1985;17(2):145–52.
15. Gao X, Bi Y, Chi K, Liu Y, Yuan T, Li X, etal. Glycine­nitronyl nitroxide conjugate protects human umbilical vein endothelial cells against hypoxia/reoxygenation injury via multiple mechanisms and ameliorates hind limb ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017;488(1):239–46.
16. McCully JD, Wakiyama H, Hsieh YJ, Jones M, Levitsky S. Differential contribution of necro­sis and apoptosis in myocardial ischemia­reperfusion injury. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004;286(5):H1923–35.
17. Brotzakis PZ, Sacco P, Jones DA, McIntyre DB, Williams R, Adiseshiah M. 31P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of acutely ischaemic limbs: the extent of changes and progress after reconstructive surgery. Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;3(3):271–6.
18. Arató E, Jancsó G, Sínay L, Kürthy M, Lantos J, Ferencz S, et al. Reperfusion injury and inamma­tory responses following acute lower limb revas­cularization surgery. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2008;39(1–4):79–85.
19. Aboo Bakkar Z, Fulford J, Gates PE, Jackman SR, Jones AM, Bond B, etal. Prolonged forearm ischemia attenuates endothelium-dependent vasodilatation and
20
P. Apichartpiyakul et al.
plasma nitric oxide metabolites in overweight middle­aged men. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018;118(8):1565–72.
20. Orrapin S, Orrapin S, Arwon S, Rerkasem K.Predictive factors for post-ischemic compartment syndrome in non-traumatic acute limb ischemia in a lower extremity. Ann Vasc Dis. 2017;10(4):378–85.
21. de Franciscis S, De Caridi G, Massara M, Spinelli F, Gallelli L, Buffone G, et al. Biomarkers in post­reperfusion syndrome after acute lower limb isch­aemia. Int Wound J. 2016;13(5):854–9.
22. Adiseshiah M, Round JM, Jones DA. Reperfusion injury in skeletal muscle: a prospective study in patients with acute limb ischaemia and clau­dicants treated by revascularization. Br J Surg. 1992;79(10):1026–9.
23. Karahalil B, Polat S, Senkoylu A, Bölükbaşi S. Evaluation of DNA damage after tourniquet­induced ischaemia/reperfusion injury during lower extremity surgery. Injury. 2010;41(7):758–62.
24. Moran CG. Reperfusion injury in skeletal muscle: a prospective study in patients with acute limb isch­aemia and claudicants treated by revascularization. Br J Surg. 1993;80(3):401–2.
25. Belkin M, Brown RD, Wright JG, LaMorte WW, Hobson RW 2nd. A new quantitative spectrophoto­metric assay of ischemia-reperfusion injury in skeletal muscle. Am J Surg. 1988;156(2):83–6.
26. Kasepalu T, Kuusik K, Lepner U, Starkopf J, Zilmer M, Eha J, et al. Remote Ischaemic precondition­ing reduces kidney injury biomarkers in patients undergoing open surgical lower limb revascularisa­tion: a randomised trial. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2020;2020:7098505.
27. Saikia KC, Bhattacharya TD, Agarwala V. Anterior compartment pressure measurement in closed frac­tures of leg. Indian J Orthop. 2008;42(2):217–21.
28. Matava MJ, Whitesides TE Jr, Seiler JG 3rd, Hewan­Lowe K, Hutton WC. Determination of the com­partment pressure threshold of muscle ischemia in a canine model. J Trauma. 1994;37(1):50–8.
29. von Keudell AG, Weaver MJ, Appleton PT, Bae DS, Dyer GSM, Heng M, etal. Diagnosis and treatment of acute extremity compartment syndrome. Lancet. 2015;386(10000):1299–310.
30. Gillani S, Cao J, Suzuki T, Hak DJ.The effect of isch­emia reperfusion injury on skeletal muscle. Injury. 2012;43(6):670–5.
31. Shah DM, Bock DE, Darling RC 3rd, Chang BB, Kupinski AM, Leather RP.Benecial effects of hyper­tonic mannitol in acute ischemia—reperfusion inju­ries in humans. Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;4(1):97–100.
32. Rabl H, Khoschsorur G, Petek W.Antioxidative vita­min treatment: effect on lipid peroxidation and limb swelling after revascularization operations. World J Surg. 1995;19(5):738–44.
33. Heilmann C, Schmoor C, Siepe M, Schlensak C, Hoh A, Fraedrich G, et al. Controlled reperfusion versus conventional treatment of the acutely ischemic limb: results of a randomized, open-label, multicenter trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(4):417–27.
34. Beyersdorf F, Sarai K, Mitrev Z, Eckel L, Ihnken K, Satter P.New surgical treatment for severe limb isch­emia. J Investig Surg. 1994;7(1):61–71.
35. Schmidt CA, Rancic Z, Lachat ML, Mayer DO, Veith FJ, Wilhelm MJ.Hypothermic, initially oxygen-free, controlled limb reperfusion for acute limb ischemia. Ann Vasc Surg. 2015;29(3):560–72.
36. Wilhelm MP, Schlensak C, Hoh A, Knipping L, Mangold G, Dallmeier Rojas D, etal. Controlled reper­fusion using a simplied perfusion system preserves function after acute and persistent limb ischemia: a preliminary study. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42(4):690–4.
37. Bailey TG, Birk GK, Cable NT, Atkinson G, Green DJ, Jones H, etal. Remote ischemic preconditioning prevents reduction in brachial artery ow-mediated dilation after strenuous exercise. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2012;303(5):H533–8.
38. Del Rio M, Lopez-Cabrera P, Malagón-López P, Del Caño-Aldonza MC, Castello JR, Provencio M.Effect of intravenous lidocaine on ischemia-reperfusion injury in DIEP microsurgical breast reconstruc­tion. A prospective double-blind randomized con­trolled clinical trial. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021;74(4):809–18.
39. Booi DI, Debats I, Deutz NEP, van der Hulst R. Arginine improves microcirculation in the free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous ap after breast reconstruction: a randomized, double-blind clin­ical trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(6):2216–23.
40. Claroni C, Torregiani G, Covotta M, Sofra M, Scotto Di Uccio A, Marcelli ME, etal. Protective effect of sevourane preconditioning on ischemia-reperfusion injury in patients undergoing reconstructive plastic surgery with microsurgical ap, a randomized con­trolled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2016;16(1):66.
41. Min SH, Choe SH, Kim WS, Ahn SH, Cho YJ.Effects of ischemic conditioning on head and neck free ap oxygenation: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):8130.
42. Kraemer R, Lorenzen J, Kabbani M, Herold C, Busche M, Vogt PM, et al. Acute effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on cutaneous microcircu­lation—a controlled prospective cohort study. BMC Surg. 2011;11:32.
43. Eisenhardt SU, Schmidt Y, Thiele JR, Iblher N, Penna V, Torio-Padron N, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy reduces the ischaemia/reperfusion-associated inammatory response in free muscle aps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(5):640–9.
3 Ischemia/Reperfusion: APotential Cause ofTissue Necrosis
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial­NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc- nd/4.0/), which permits any non­commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if you modied the licensed material. You do not have permission under this license to share adapted material derived from this chapter or parts of it.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
21
Imaging, Vascular Assessment: Extension inDepth andVascular Anomalies
SadanoriAkita, HidekiIshimaru, andMihoNoguchi
4

4.1 Introduction

Vascular anomalies are comprised of two main types: vascular tumors, which include infantile hemangioma and other rare vascular tumors in both children and adults, and vascular malforma­tions [1]. Vascular tumors are differentiated from vascular malformations based on the clinical appearance, imaging, and pathologic characteris­tics [2]. Examples of vascular tumors include infantile hemangioma, congenital hemangioma (rapidly involuting congenital hemangioma (RICH), partially involuting congenital heman­gioma (PICH), or non-involuting congenital hemangioma (NICH)), kaposiform hemangioen-
S. Akita (*) Department of Plastic Surgery, Tamaki-Aozora Hospital, Tokushima, Japan
Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan e-mail: akitas@hf.rim.or.jp
H. Ishimaru Department of Radiological Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
M. Noguchi Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, National Hospital Organization Nagasaki Medical Center, Ohmura, Japan
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Nagano, Japan
dothelioma, tufted angioma, pyogenic granu­loma, and hemangiopericytoma. Diagnosis of vascular malformations involves the use of vari­ous imaging methods that must be correlated with clinical ndings and the purpose of imaging, whether it is for diagnosis, pre- or intra-treatment assessment, or follow-up.
The majority of infantile hemangiomas (IHs) are small and not hazardous and may recede spontaneously in three phases of proliferation, involution, and involuted phases by the age of 7 years or so. However, IH can be alarming if found in life- and function-threatening locations such as the eyelid, orbit, ear, or airway. Treatment is required for ulceration, continued infection, or hemorrhage (Fig.4.1), which are the most com­mon complications of IH.The incidence of ulcer­ation in a referral population is generally reported to be about 16%. A prospective study of 1096 patients showed that the median age at ulceration was 4.0months, which correlates with the end of the proliferative phase [3]. Risk factors for ulcer­ation include segmental morphologic characteris­tics, large size, and mixed supercial and deep subtype. Early white discoloration may suggest impending ulceration [4].
Vascular malformations consist of capillary malformation (CM), venous malformation (VM), lymphatic malformation (LM), and arteriovenous malformation (AVM). Some cases involve a combination of more than one malformation and are categorized as combined vascular
© The Author(s) 2024 L. Téot et al. (eds.), Skin Necrosis, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60954-1_4
23
24
Fig. 4.1 Progression of infantile hemangioma on the right side of the face at 1month in the rst visit (left) and at
1.5years (right). The ulcers in the preauricular, the cheek, and the submandibular areas are healed
S. Akita et al.
malformations or complex syndromes such as Klippel- Trénaunay syndrome (CM+VM+LM) or Parkes Weber syndrome (AVM/or arteriove­nous stula (AVF) + skin pseudo-CM +lymph­edema), which exhibit more systemic signs and symptoms. Skin necrosis is often manifested in severe AVM, LM, combined CM + LM, and minority cases of hemangiomas, such as IH.
4.2 Assessment andImaging Tools
Many imaging tools are able to determine the diagnosis of vascular malformations.
4.2.1 Conventional X-Rays
The conventional plain X-rays outline the mass and the area of the lesions. Sometimes, they also identify the contrasted lesions. Venous malfor­mations (VMs) may be diagnosed when phlebo­liths (vascular or venous stones) are visible on plain X-rays. Bone distortion is often seen in large malformations that have a soft tissue mass effect. Some diffuse and extensive VMs can cause osteolytic lesions and increase the risk of
pathological fractures. AVMs affecting bones can sometimes result in osteolytic lesions due to the presence of periosteal and intraosseous nidus (nest) or large draining venous channels after the nidus.
4.2.2 Duplex Ultrasonography
This imaging is primarily used as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool [5] during the rst clinical visit. It distinguishes between tumors and mal­formations using duplex ultrasonography. It also identies a vascular malformation and pin­points its type. The imaging demonstrates whether the lesion is cystic or tissular, claries the presence or absence of ow, and thus distin­guishes between fast-ow and slow-ow mal­formations (Fig. 4.2). The angiostructure and vessel density can be assessed, but its reliability is not always high. Peak ow velocities and arterial output can be measured in AVMs. In head and neck or extremity AVMs, comparing the arterial output on the normal side to the abnormal contralateral side is crucial for diag­nosis and prognosis, particularly regarding the possibility of cardiac failure, and therefore use­ful for follow-up of AVMs.
4 Imaging, Vascular Assessment: Extension inDepth andVascular Anomalies
Fig. 4.2 Typical duplex ultrasonic examination. Flow patterns and localization of the lesions are depicted (left); ow intensity and pulse are demonstrated (right)
25
4.2.3 Computed Tomography (CT)
This method was previously considered of lim­ited interest, even with enhanced contrast, as it only provides information on whether a lesion is highly vascularized or not. However, precise delineation and diagnosis of soft tissue lesions remain challenging, except for macrocystic LMs, where cysts are clearly depicted. The presence of phleboliths may indicate a diagnosis of venous malformation, as distinctive calcications develop on thrombosis and debris resulting from slow ow. Bony displacement or alteration can also be seen due to long-term compression in both VMs and LMs. Pathologic fractures and absorption may be observed in bone or bone­adjacent AVMs. Currently, the less invasive 4D CT has replaced angiography and can contribute to therapeutic planning and post-therapy assessment.
4.2.4 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
This is the best diagnostic modality for optimal analysis of soft tissue masses, as it provides proper diagnosis, distinguishes between tissular and cystic forms, and delineates fast or slow ves­sel ows. Venous and lymphatic malformations have their own distinct pattern. They appear as hyperintense on T2-weighted spin-echo
sequences and are optimally seen in fat­suppression sequences. T1-weighted and fat­suppression sequences with contrast agents such as gadolinium demonstrate intense enhancement in infantile hemangiomas, while the enhance­ment is inconsistent and progressive on dynamic sequences in VMs. Gadolinium contrast allows for differential diagnosis between VMs and LMs. LMs can be distinguished from VMs as LMs show enhancement only at the margins of the cysts, whereas VMs are clearly and evenly stained.
MRI is necessary before treatment to make decisions about the extent of the lesion and its relationship to neighboring nerves, vessels, and vascular malformation. It is also necessary for the identication and diagnosis of the lesion. In fast-ow vessels, they can be identied as ow voids. MR angiography can conrm the diagno­sis of fast-ow pathology, but it remains insuf­cient for accurately detecting AVMs’ nidus and angiostructures.
4.2.5 Vascular Imaging
This procedure is primarily used for the assess­ment of fast-ow vascular lesions. Angiography is a powerful tool for the pretreatment evaluation of AVMs, particularly in detecting its characteris­tic early venous drainage. The angiostructure of an AVM can be determined by determining its
26
S. Akita et al.
location, arterial supply, draining veins, and rela­tionship with normal neighboring arteries and veins. Angiography is also used for diagnosing quiescent AVMs, which may mimic a capillary malformation. However, with the current advancements in technology, 4D CT imaging can often replace angiography for pretreatment assessment with less invasiveness and greater accuracy.

4.3 Treatment

4.3.1 AVM
In vascular malformations, skin lesions are most commonly seen in AVMs,, which can develop ulcers during their natural clinical course or as a result of post-therapeutic side effects following embolization or sclerotherapy. A practical clini­cal staging system has been proposed for AVMs. This staging, as described by Schobinger, con­sists of four stages: (I) the lesion presents as warm, pink-blue macules; (II) it expands with pulsations, thrills, and bruits; (III) it becomes destructive with pain, hemorrhage, or ulceration; and (IV) it progresses to decompensation and congestive heart failure [6]. Treatment is ideal in stages I and II, but often the lesion goes unno­ticed until stage III, when ulceration is observed
as a clinically destructive sign. With a mean fol­low- up of 4.6years, the cure rate for AVMs was 75% for stage I, 67% for stage II, and 48% for stage III [6]. AVMs can worsen after trauma, hor­monal changes, pregnancy, or puberty. Duplex ultrasonography, as well as clinical signs and symptoms, can assist in the therapeutic decision­making process. However, a more precise and effective evaluation using contrast MRI, 4D CT, and angiography is necessary. While MRI pro­vides information on the spatial relationship between the lesion and surrounding tissue and organs, 4D CT and angiography are most useful for abnormal vascular assessment and therapeu­tic evaluation during embolization, which is often required to eliminate the nidus, ow, pooling, and drainage patterns around the lesion. When the AVM lesion is localized, as is often seen in stage II, and to protect vital organs, surgical removal alone or combined with prior embolization within 24–48h is the preferred rst choice. If the defect is large, reconstruction will follow [7]. If the lesion is extensive and destructive (stage III) and the margin of the lesion is unclear, controlled reduction of the lesion should be considered. Embolization to control ow supply and drainage and subsequent percutaneous transcutaneous ultrasonic-guided sclerotherapy within 24–48 h may result in sufcient reconstruction of the wound bed (Fig.4.3).
4 Imaging, Vascular Assessment: Extension inDepth andVascular Anomalies
a
27
Fig. 4.3 (a) A 30-year-old male with capillary malforma- tion and arteriovenous malformation (CM-AVM) in his right face including the ear. Skin discoloration and bulg­ing in the right face due to CM-AVM are seen with minor pinhole wounds. (b) The imaging data of MRI, 4D CT, and ultrasonic demonstrated multiple in-ow vessels with enlarged venous pouches. (c) After second selective embolization, the nidus and the abnormality are con-
trolled, but the tissue necrosis is seen. (d) At day 13, both necrotic tissue and exposed embolizing agents were excised, and the ear was reconstructed. (e) At 9 months after the nal reconstruction, the angiogram and MRI imaging improved. (f) The patient demonstrated a satis­factory appearance, and no bruit or thrill is observed in the right face
28
S. Akita et al.
b
Fig. 4.3 (continued)
c
4 Imaging, Vascular Assessment: Extension inDepth andVascular Anomalies
Direct puncture
29
d
Fig. 4.3 (continued)