Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5191_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
68 Мб
Скачать
282
S. Akita
have a history of skin injury, 25% have experi­enced blunt trauma, and 70% have at least one chronic disease. Half of all cases of necrotizing fasciitis occur in one lower limb and 30% in one upper limb.

44.3 Symptom

The early stage of necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is difcult to diagnose due to its nonspecic signs, such as swelling, erythema, and pain in the affected site, which can resemble non-severe soft tissue infections like cellulitis and erysipe­las. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MR) may help differentiate necrotizing fasci­itis from non-necrotizing infections by measur­ing the thickness and detecting the presence of low signal intensity in the deep fascia on fat­suppressed T2-weighted images, as well as the presence of non-enhancing areas in the deep fascia or involvement of three or more compart­ments in one limb [5]. NF is often accompanied by severe pain at onset, proportional to the physical ndings [4].
44.4 Clinical Course andFeatures ofNecrotizing Fasciitis
NF is a rapidly progressive and destructive bacte­rial infection affecting supercial and deep soft tissues, including the skin, subcutaneous tissue, fascia, and muscle. Within hours to days, the infec­tion can progress from a seemingly benign skin lesion to a highly mortal condition (Fig. 44.1). Many clinical studies have reported that rapid and deep enough surgical debridement of infected tis­sue within 12–24h from the onset of the original clinical manifestation is crucial for saving lives [4]. The bacterial infection spreads along the fas­cial and peri-ligamental planes, and excision of adjacent muscles or deep tissue is required. The fascia, with its loose brous connective tissue and neurovascular structures, provides a little anatomic barrier against the dissemination of pathogens. GAS proliferates in sterile sites and rapidly attacks acute inammatory cells, resulting in severe tissue damage, which is compounded by potent prote­ases and degenerative virulent factors expressed by invading GAS and host-released polymorpho­nuclear (PMN) leukocytes (Fig.44.2).
44 Infection Context: Necrotizing Fasciitis
283
Fig. 44.1 A 66-year-old female, over years of medica­tion of oral steroid (15mg prednisolone) due to idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). Sudden onset of group A streptococcal necrotizing fasciitis in her right calf
Fig. 44.2 Severe tissue damage deep to the fascia by invading group A streptococci and host-releasing poly­morphonuclear (PMN) leukocytes (arrows)
(right), ipsilateral thigh and inguinal lymph node inam­mation (middle), and contralateral calf pigmentation largely due to ITP and continued hemorrhage (right)
44.5 Diagnosis andTests
44.5.1 Physical Diagnosis
The odds ratios (ORs) between necrotizing fasci­itis and non-severe soft tissue infections for fever, tachycardia, and hypotension are 3.4 (1.6–7.4),
4.5 (1.7–11.8), and 2.6 (1.1–6.0), respectively
[6]. The likelihood of the presence of bullae in NF compared to non-severe soft tissue infections is 3.5 (1.0–11.9). Six percent of NF cases have skin necrosis, while only 2% of non-severe soft tissue infections have it. Initially, NF presents with erythematous and ecchymotic skin lesions,
284
S. Akita
which quickly evolve into bleeding bullae, indi­cating that deep blood vessels in the fascia or muscle compartments have become occluded. The presence of bullae is therefore crucial for the clinical diagnosis of NF.Ludwig’s angina (in the submandibular space) and Fournier’s gangrene (in the scrotum, penis, or vulva) are variants of NF and often exhibit an explosive and aggressive clinical course.
44.5.2 Laboratory Tests
The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score was developed to pro­vide diagnostic clues for NF. A retrospective study suggests that a score of 6 or higher is highly indicative of NF, with a 92% positive predictive value and a 96% negative predictive value [7]. The LRINEC score is useful for categorizing patients into risk groups for NF.

44.6 Treatment

44.6.1 Medical Therapy
The broad-spectrum antibiotics should be empiri­cally and immediately administered to suspected NF patients, as they may cover common sus­pected pathogens. The rst-line antimicrobial agents for necrotizing fasciitis are listed in Table44.1. In type I (polymicrobial) infections, the selection of an antimicrobial should be based on the patient’s medical history, Gram staining, and culture results. Coverage against anaerobes is important in type I infections, and metronida­zole, clindamycin, beta-lactams with a beta­lactamase inhibitor, or carbapenems are typically chosen. For patients who have been exposed to antibiotics previously, initial empirical therapy should take into account broader coverage against Gram-negative pathogens. Ampicillin-sulbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, ticarcillin-clavulanate, newer cephalosporins, or carbapenems are poten­tial options. In type II (monomicrobial) infec­tions, the most common causative pathogen is group A Streptococcus, but sometimes
Table 44.1 Treatment of necrotizing fasciitis, rst-line antimicrobial agent
Mixed infection Streptococcus infection Ampicillin-sulbactam Penicillin
or plus
Piperacillin­tazobactam plus S. aureus infection Clindamycin Cefazolin plus Vancomycin (for resistant
Ciprooxacin Clindamycin Imipenem/cilastatin Clostridium infection Meropenem Clindamycin Cefotaxime Penicillin
plus
Metronidazole
or
Clindamycin
Clindamycin
strains)
methicillin- susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can also be present. The use of tetracyclines and third-generation cephalosporins is crucial in managing Vibrio infections. The sys- temic antibiotic therapy for NF may continue for 4–6weeks, as the deep-seated infection is estab­lished. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is a desirable option for neutralizing streptococcal toxins.
44.6.2 Surgical Therapy
Early and wide and deep enough surgical debride­ment is the mainstay treatment for NF and leads to better mortality compared to those who under­went surgery with a delay of a few hours [8]. When NF is suspected, the patient should be brought to the operating room for extensive sur­gical debridement. All infected tissue should be completely removed until there is no further evi­dence of infection. If further debridement is required, the patient should be returned to the operating room immediately. In this context, the use of articial dermis after debridement is use­ful because it does not result in the loss of the patient’s own tissue and makes it easier for “second- look” surgery or secondary reconstruc­tion [9] (Fig.44.3).
44 Infection Context: Necrotizing Fasciitis
285
Fig. 44.3 Immediate (within 2h from the onset) thorough debridement up to the fascia (left), temporal coverage with articial dermis (middle), and 6years after secondary split-thickness skin grafting (right)

References

1. Davies HD, McGeer A, Schwartz B, Green K, Cann D, Simor AE, Low DE. Invasive group A strep­tococcal infections in Ontario, Canada. Ontario group A streptococcal study group. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:547–54.
2. Carapetis JR, Steer AC, Mulholland EK, Weber M.The global burden of group A streptococcal soft­tissue diseases. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:685–94.
3. Olsen RJ, Musser JM. Molecular patho­genesis of necrotizing fasciitis. Annu Rev Pathol. 2010;5:1–31. https://doi.org/10.1146/
annurev- pathol- 121808- 102135.
4. Kaul R, McGeer A, Low DE, Green K, Schwartz B. Population-based surveillance for group A strep­tococcal necrotizing fasciitis: clinical features, prog-
nostic indicators, and microbiologic analysis of seventy-seven cases. Ontario Group A streptococcal study. Am J Med. 1997;103:18–24.
5. Vinh DC, Embil JM.Rapidly progressive soft tissue infections. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:501–13.
6. Frazee BW, Fee C, Lynn J, Wang R, Bostrom A, Hargis C, Moore P.Community-acquired necrotizing soft tissue infections: a review of 122 cases present­ing to a single emergency department over 12 years. J Emerg Med. 2008;34:139–46.
7. Wong C, Wang Y.The diagnosis of necrotizing fasci­itis. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2005;18:101–6.
8. McHenry CR, Piotrowski JJ, Petrinic D, Malagoni MA.Determinants of mortality for necrotizing soft­tissue infections. Ann Surg. 1995;221:558–63.
9. Akita S, Tanaka K, Hirano A.Lower extremity recon­struction after necrotizing fasciitis and necrotic skin lesions using a porcine-derived skin substitute. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59:759–63.
286
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial­NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc- nd/4.0/), which permits any non­commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if you modied the licensed material. You do not have permission under this license to share adapted material derived from this chapter or parts of it.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
S. Akita
Part VI
Surgical Context of Skin Necrosis
Introduction toSkin Necrosis inSurgical Context
LucTéot
45
Skin necrosis creates a local situation potentially leading to a spreading infection with vital conse­quences. Surgical debridement remains an issue as most of the surgeons may have concerns to introduce a septic patient in an OR which is not devoted to septic situations.
However, surgeons wiling to interfere more with skin necrosis may adopt recommendations concerning the post-debridement sequence lead­ing to coverage and nal closure.
Some wound situations need a surgeon involvement, particularly when a small orice is hiding a large cavity or when there is a prolonged undermining or an apparent stula with no skin exit (Figs.45.1, 45.2, and 45.3).
Surgeons should understand the risk of spread­ing infection and the need for an adapted inter­vention depending on the local wound geomorphometrics but also on the general status of the patient and particularly on the vascular status.
In vascular leg ulcers, the degree of arteriopa­thy should be recognized with clinical signs (absence of pedal pulses), evaluated by ABPI (normal between 0.8 and 1.2), Doppler, and toe pressure and sent to a revascularization proce­dure by a vascular surgeon when needed.
In diabetic foot ulcers, some situations of skin
necrosis are more frequently encountered:
– A distal necrosis involving a digit which does
not cause huge difculties.
– A part of the forefoot or a medial or lateral
part of the foot where a collaboration between the avascular surgeon and the plastic/orthope­dic surgeon is needed.
– A large infected cavity may develop with a
limited entry usually located in a distal inter­digital web. This situation requires inserting an instrument in the cavity to check how long the cavities are and in which direction (dorsal, plantar, lateral aspect of the foot). A coun­terincision is recommended by some authors, allowing to drain efciently in a Seton mode (one entry, one exit) using wires or thin drain­ages. The drainage may limit the inner pres­sure and spreading infection, a factor of progressing tissue destruction.
The chapters presented in this part give an overview of the proposed surgical procedures concerning the different surgical strategies (Fig.45.1) or exposing hidden pockets or drain­ing subcutaneous cavities (Figs.45.2 and 45.3).
L. Téot (*) Department of Plastic Surgery, Burns and Wound Healing, Montpellier University Hospital, Hôpital La Colombière, CICAT Occitanie, Montpellier Cedex 5, France e-mail: l-teot@chu-montpellier.fr
© The Author(s) 2024 L. Téot et al. (eds.), Skin Necrosis, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60954-1_45
289
retention
excision
exposure
contraction
Long blindcavity: poor dr
e
using a scalpel
dressing
absorption
Fig. 45.1 The “deroong” procedure consists in remov­ing the cover of a poorly drained cavity prior to apply any type of dressing. This procedure allows to guarantee a full
ainage
Open thedistalend
Fig. 45.2 Cavity wounds: drainage strategies
contact between the dressing and the edges of the wound, a prerequisite to start the granulation tissue formation and the contraction of the wound
Double entrywound Drains shouldbeleftinsid
Fig. 45.3 emergency drainage in infected DFU reduces the purulent liquid pressure inside the wound and limits tissular damages
45 Introduction toSkin Necrosis inSurgical Context
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial­NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc- nd/4.0/), which permits any non­commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if you modied the licensed material. You do not have permission under this license to share adapted material derived from this chapter or parts of it.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
291

Skin Necrosis Over Osteosynthetic Material

CamilleRodaix
46

46.1 Introduction

Skin necrosis is a frequent complication in the management of traumatized extremity, particu­larly in the case of open fracture.
The treatment of open fracture is not the pur­pose of this chapter and will not be discussed here.
A prolonged period of hardware exposure ulti­mately leads to contamination, and then the goal of treatment is to prevent infection of hardware and underlying bone.
The traditional management of soft tissue defects and exposed hardware includes irrigation and debridement, intravenous antibiotics, and likely removal of the hardware. Obviously, preser­vation of the hardware would be the optimal goal to maintain stability and optimal reduction [1].
Skin necrosis covering osteosynthetic mate­rial can be divided into two groups: on the one hand that which happened early after the surgery because of soft tissue injury (contused or crushed) or too tensile strength in stitched and on the other hand that when a deep infection induces skin necrosis, early or later after the surgery.
In all cases, skin necrosis had to be removed, and bone and hardware had to be covered with soft tissue.
C. Rodaix (*)
Department of Surgery, Montpellier Regional University Hospital, Montpellier, France
Orthopedic surgery, Polyclinique st Roch, Montpellier, France

46.2 Postoperative Skin Necrosis

In this case, skin necrosis is initially a soft tissue complication but can lead to a bone infection.
This is often seen in lower limb trauma with open or closed fracture. Skin necrosis appears because of a combination of soft tissue injuries (direct contusion, soft tissue degloving, displaced fracture fragments, articular dislocation, com­partment syndrome), vascular injuries (hema­toma, ischemia), early infection, and surgery (strength stitches, skin undermining, surgical approach).
46.2.1 Debridement
Those wounds require aggressive irrigation and debridement. This involves excision of all necrotic, devitalized, and contaminated tissue and bone as well as incisions for additional expo­sure and drainage [2] and had to be repeated every 24–48 h to ensure that all necrotic and devitalized tissue had been removed.
The aim of debridement is to prevent the risk of bacterial proliferation and to remove debris and necrotic tissue.
Many different techniques are available. Mechanical methods include water-jet dissection (Versajet hydrosurgery system [3]) or coblation technology (ArthroCare). Consensus on irriga­tion technique and additives (bacitracin, antisep­tics, surfactants, or non-sterile soap) still remains
© The Author(s) 2024 L. Téot et al. (eds.), Skin Necrosis, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60954-1_46
293