Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5191_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
68 Мб
Скачать

Arterial Leg Ulcers

JosefAschwanden, JurgHafner, VincenzoJacomella, andSeverinLäuchli
48

48.1 Introduction

Leg ulcers are not a diagnosis but a symptom of many different diseases. In this chapter, we will describe leg ulcers caused by arterial disease. However, many other causes should be consid­ered in refractory ulceration on the lower extrem­ity such as venous disease, neuropathy, and miscellaneous causes like vasculitis, malignancy, and autoimmune disease and even rare causes like pyoderma gangrenosum [1], thromboangiitis obliterans, or arterial-venous malformation. Martorell hypertensive ischemic leg ulcers [2] as part of the arterial causes are not discussed here as they are described in another chapter. Very often, the ulcers of the lower leg result from a combination of factors [3]. Therefore, it is impor­tant to rule out arterial insufciency even when other causes or clinical signs are present. For example, about 15% of all leg ulcers are of a mixed arterial-venous origin [46]. We postulate that every patient with ulceration on the lower leg should receive an arterial workup, not only because a concomitant arterial disease may delay healing but also because of the underlying sys­temic process (arteriosclerosis) for which the
J. Aschwanden · J. Hafner · S. Läuchli (*) Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland e-mail: Severin.laeuchli@usz.ch
V. Jacomella Department of Angiology, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
patient might prot from an appropriate systemic therapy [7, 8].
48.2 Epidemiology andClassication
Chronic ulceration of the lower leg can result from several underlying factors as mentioned above. The most common cause is venous insuf­ciency in about 75%, followed by ulcers of mixed venous and arterial (15%) and those of pri­marily arterial (4%) origin [4, 5]. Arterial leg ulcers are caused by an oxygen decit in the tis­sue resulting from reduced tissue blood perfusion due to occlusion of the arterial lumen. The most common cause for this occlusion is peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) due to an arte­riosclerotic process. Generalized arteriosclerosis is therefore the most common cause not only of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease but also of peripheral vascular disease. The preva­lence of PAOD in the general population varies between 7% and 21% [9]. It is related to age, gen­der, and denition of PAOD (by the cutoff value of the ankle-brachial index (ABI) and/or the pres­ence of symptoms). The Fontaine stages classify the clinical appearance of PAOD (Table 48.1). Before progressing to a clinically symptomatic stage such as intermittent claudication or even critical limb ischemia, PAOD is typically asymp­tomatic for several years. Approximately 23% of all patients are asymptomatic, and this is proba-
© The Author(s) 2024 L. Téot et al. (eds.), Skin Necrosis, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60954-1_48
305
306
J. Aschwanden et al.
Table 48.1 Fontaine classication for PAOD
Stage I Asymptomatic Stage II Intermittent claudication
Walking distance: IIA >200m, with no disablement IIB <200m with disablement Stage III Resting pain Stage IV Peripheral necrosis/gangrene
bly one reason that PAOD stage I seems to be underestimated [8]. Sometimes, symptoms can also be masked by reduced walking distance due to other reasons or by polyneuropathy secondary to diabetes. In stage II with intermittent claudica­tion as the main symptom, rest pain is normally missing. Stage III ischemic rest pain is typically a nocturnal pain. Approximately 15–20% of patients with intermittent claudication will progress to critical ischemia. The distinction between arterial insufciency and critical isch­emia is not clearly outlined in the literature, and critical limb ischemia occurs only in a minority of patients with PAOD [10]. In 1996, the Second European Consensus [11] outlined criteria for the diagnosis of chronic critical limb ischemia: recal­citrant rest pain or distal necrosis of more than 2weeks’ duration in the presence of (A) a sys­tolic ankle pressure (AP) 50mmHg or less, (B) a systolic toe pressure of 30mmHg or less, or (C) a transcutaneous oxygen pressure (tcPO2) of 10mmHg or less. In the last few years, the thresh­old for critical ischemia has been raised several times. Necrotic ulceration occurs in stage IV, usually on the toes or the back of the feet, but can also occur in stage II after trauma or in combina­tion with chronic venous disease and is then gen­erally considered a “complicated” stage IIB. In fact, the majority of arterial ulcers occur in “com­plicated” stage IIB on the lateral lower leg and do
not match the criteria for critical ischemia. The angiosome concept is one possible explanation for the occurrence of nonhealing ulcers above the threshold of critical ischemia. It was rst described by reconstructive plastic surgeons in 1987 [12]. They divided the tissue into specic three-dimensional sectors of the body supplied by specic arteries and veins, named angiosomes. Each angiosome therefore consists of a topo­graphically specic arteriosome and correspond­ing venosome supply, which build block systems of perfusion. Neighboring angiosomes are linked by numerous communicating vessels, so-called choke vessels. In ischemic conditions, these interconnections between adjacent angiosomes create a very effective compensatory system in non-atherosclerotic and nondiabetic limbs [13]. In atherosclerotic or other changes of the large collateral vessels, such as those typically accom­panying diabetic arterial disease below the knee and end-stage renal disease (ESRD), this natural “rescue system” between adjacent angiosomes may be jeopardized.

48.3 Clinical Findings

The typical localization for arterial leg ulcers is the lateral malleolar region for PAOD stage IIB (Fig. 48.1), whereas distal arterial necrosis (PAOD stage IV) is usually localized in the foot and toe region (Fig. 48.2). Arterial leg ulcers often have irregular edges and/or a “punched­out” appearance. The ulcer base is usually poorly developed with a grayish granulation tissue. Signs of chronic venous disease are missing except in mixed ulcers. Painful and necrotic areas are the typical appearance for all ischemic ulcers.
48 Arterial Leg Ulcers
Fig. 48.1 Typical arterial leg ulcer on the lateral malleo­lar aspect of the lower leg (PAOD complicated stage IIB)
Fig. 48.2 Distal arterial necrosis due to PAOD stage IV

48.4 Diagnosis

The rst test to rule out arterial insufciency should be the palpation of the pedal pulses. It should be mentioned that the dorsalis pedis pulse
307
Table 48.2 Doppler ankle-brachial ratio [15]
0.91–1.4 Normal, if under exercise no ABI loss
0.5–0.85 PAOD, claudication (mild to moderate disease); a wound can heal
<0.5 Severe PAOD, threat of tissue and limb loss >1.4 May be due to diabetes, Mönckeberg disease,
renal disease
is missing in about 10% of individuals and the palpation of the posterior tibial pulse may be dif­cult due to swelling or presence of ulceration caused by a concomitant chronic venous insuf­ciency. If a pulse is palpable, we can assume that the ankle pressure is >100mmHg [14] and wound healing should be possible. If no pulses can be detected, noninvasive vascular testing should always be performed.
As a fast and simple test, the ankle-brachial index (ABI) can be measured very easily with a cheap and simple continuous-wave (CW) Doppler probe (8–10mMHz). The ABI is dened as the systolic ankle pressure divided by the sys­tolic arm pressure and is considered an accurate and reliable marker of symptomatic and asymp­tomatic PAOD (Table48.2). Signicant arteriop­athy is normally dened as an ABI <0.91 and an ABI <0.5 as severe arterial insufciency [16]. The ABI measurement can therefore identify patients at risk of any systemic atherothrombotic events even in an asymptomatic stage. Identication of asymptomatic PAOD also leads to intensied targeted prophylactic anti­atherothrombotic treatment that can reduce mor­bidity and mortality as mentioned above [8].
To recognize critical ischemia, the measure­ment of ankle systolic pressure is the most accu­rate test. If the pressure is below the level of critical limb ischemia as dened with an ankle systolic pressure <50mmHg [11], leg ulcers will only heal in 20% of cases, and aggressive revas­cularization therapy should be performed [17]. In contrast, a systolic pressure over 70mmHg can nearly exclude arterial insufciency as a cause for the ulcers. If the arteries are not compressible, i.e., the ABI is higher than 1.4 or the difference of the measured pressure between ankle and arm exceeds 75 mmHg, calcication of the arteries should be considered. In these cases, a toe sys-
308
J. Aschwanden et al.
Table 48.3 Use of noninvasive vascular tests to predict the presence of underlying severe arteriopathy [18]
Noninvasive avascular testing Findings
Pedal pulses Present Unlikely
Absent Possible Ankle systolic pressure With ulcer <50–70mmHg Possible Without ulcer, with rest pain Toe systolic pressure >50mmHg Unlikely
tcPO
2
a
Proceed with further, noninvasive vascular tests to con­rm or rule out severe arteriopathy especially if clinical evolution is poor
>70mmHg Unlikely
<30–50 Likely
<50mmHg Likely >30mmHg Unlikely <30mmHg Likely
Severe arteriopathy
a
a
tolic pressure or a tcPO2 measurement should be performed. In cases of Mönckeberg mediacalci­nosis, the pole test technique can also give further information concerning the critical ischemia of the lower limbs. A toe systolic pressure lower than 50mmHg or a tcPO2 lower than 30mmHg is diagnostic for critical ischemia (Table 48.3). If the tcPO2 is over 30mmHG, a wound can heal. Ultrasonic duplex scanning or arteriography can localize the arterial lesion but cannot make any statement about the severity of the arterial dis­ease. In contrast, it is a very good surveillance tool after an invasive intervention or as rst-step screening in order to evaluate an invasive proce­dure. The gold standard to investigate PAOD is still angiography, especially when an interven­tion is planned. Recently, magnetic resonance angiography has emerged as a noninvasive imag­ing modality without the risks associated with conventional angiography (e.g., arterial puncture, plaque embolization, and contrast-induced nephropathy).

48.5 Treatment

The arteriosclerotic process as a systemic prob­lem needs an interdisciplinary approach. The common arteriosclerotic risk factors should be treated aggressively (Table48.4). Whenever pos­sible, revascularization should be attempted by
Table 48.4 Risk factors for arteriosclerosis and PAOD
Hypertension Diabetes Elevated cholesterol, especially low-density lipoprotein Smoking
angioplasty or vascular surgery. This is the only effective therapeutic option to allow wound heal­ing when ischemic necrosis is present. Furthermore, it often provides the most efcient pain relief. If revascularization by interventional or surgical means is not possible, intravenous application of iloprost can ameliorate the situa­tion, but this is often limited by side effects (e.g., hypotension, headaches). Exercise also plays an important role in improving the maximal walking distance and thus increasing the blood perfusion. Adjuvant medical treatment with antithrombotic or rheological agents can improve the outcome [19].
For the local therapy, the common principles of modern wound care should be applied. Sharp surgical debridement is of foremost importance to remove the bioburden, which can delay wound healing. However, as arterial ulcers often reach to deeper structures, it should be performed by sur­geons or wound care experts with adequate train­ing. Enzymatic debridement and biosurgery with maggots can be viable alternatives. Local wound infection can be treated with wound antiseptics or silver dressings; if signs of systemic infection are present, systemic antibiotics have to be utilized.
The choice of wound dressing must take into consideration the amount of exudation and necro­sis and the phase of wound healing. Generally, occlusive dressings should be avoided, as their main mode of action, a local increase of CO2 ten­sion, is not desirable for ischemic ulcers and the detection of wound infection could be delayed. Semiocclusive dressings can be utilized with cau­tion, if granulation tissue exceeds necrotic areas and there are no signs of wound infection. The type of wound dressing does not signicantly inuence healing times [20, 21]. Therefore, the choice of wound dressing should be guided by patient-centered concerns such as exudate man­agement and pain control [22]. Wound pain is one of the main concerns of patients [23].
48 Arterial Leg Ulcers
309
Dressings that avoid desiccation of the wound and which do not traumatize the wound when the dressing is changed are therefore ideal.
Arterial leg ulcers can show a very protracted healing time, especially if surgical or interven­tional revascularization is not possible. In these cases, advanced methods often have to be uti­lized, such as acellular matrices, keratinocyte cultures, or growth factors. In many instances, split-thickness skin grafts can improve the wound pain immediately and accelerate healing, even if the wound bed does not show sufcient granula­tion for a full graft take.

References

1. Pannier F, Rabe E.Differential diagnosis of leg ulcers. Phlebology. 2013;28(Suppl. 1):55–60.
2. Hafner J, Nobbe S, Partsch H, Lauchli S, Mayer D, Amann-Vesti B, et al. Martorell hypertensive isch­emic leg ulcer: a model of ischemic subcutaneous arteriolosclerosis. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146:961–8.
3. Fukaya E, Margolis DJ.Approach to diagnosing lower extremity ulcers. Dermatol Ther. 2013;26:181–6.
4. Koerber A, Schadendorf D, Dissemond J.Genese des Ulcus cruris. Hautarzt. 2009;60:483–8.
5. Läuchli S, Bayard I, Hafner J, Hunziker T, Mayer D, French L.Unterschiedliche Abheilungsdauer und Häugkeit der Hospitalisation bei Ulcus cruris ver­schiedener Ursachen. Hautarzt. 2013;64(12):917–22.
6. Ghauri AS, Nyamekye I, Grabs AJ, Farndon JR, Poskitt KR.The diagnosis and management of mixed arterial/venous leg ulcers in community-based clinics. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1998;16:350–5.
7. van Kuijk JP, Flu WJ, Poldermans D.Risk factors and peripheral arterial disease; a plea for objective mea­surements. Atherosclerosis. 2011;214:37–8.
8. Hayoz D, Bounameaux H, Canova CR. Swiss Atherothrombosis Survey: a eld report on the occur­rence of symptomatic and asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease. J Intern Med. 2005;258:238–43.
9. Alzamora MT, Fores R, Baena-Diez JM, Pera G, Toran P, Sorribes M, etal. The peripheral arterial dis­ease study (PERART/ARTPER): prevalence and risk factors in the general population. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:38.
10. Hafner J, Schaad I, Schneider E, Seifert B, Burg G, Cassina PC.Leg ulcers in peripheral arterial disease
(arterial leg ulcers): impaired wound healing above the threshold of chronic critical limb ischemia. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;43:1001–8.
11. Anon. Second European Consensus Document on chronic critical leg ischemia. Circulation. 1991;84:IV1–26.
12. Taylor GI, Palmer JH.The vascular territories (angio­somes) of the body: experimental study and clinical applications. Br J Plast Surg. 1987;40:113–41.
13. Attinger CE, Evans KK, Bulan E, Blume P, Cooper P. Angiosomes of the foot and ankle and clinical implications for limb salvage: reconstruction, inci­sions, and revascularization. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:261S–93S.
14. Christensen JH, Freundlich M, Jacobsen BA, Falstie­Jensen N.Clinical relevance of pedal pulse palpation in patients suspected of peripheral arterial insuf­ciency. J Intern Med. 1989;226:95–9.
15. Ray SA, Buckenham TM, Belli AM, Taylor RS, Dormandy JA.The nature and importance of changes in toe-brachial pressure indices following percutane­ous transluminal angioplasty for leg ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1997;14:125–33.
16. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, Nehler MR, Harris KA, Fowkes FG.Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg. 2007;45(1):S5–67.
17. Wütschert R, Bounameaux H. Quantication de l’insufsance artérielle des membres inférieurs: méthodes et applications. Med Hyg. 1998;56:137–40.
18. Hafner J, Ramelet AA, Schmeller W, Brunner UV.Management of leg ulcers. Curr Probl Dermatol. 1999;27:4–7.
19. Coccheri S, Palareti G, Fortunato G.Antithrombotic drugs in peripheral obliterative arterial diseases. Haemostasis. 1994;24:118–27.
20. Chaby G, Senet P, Vaneau M, Martel P, Guillaume JC, Meaume S, etal. Dressings for acute and chronic wounds: a systematic review. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143:1297–304.
21. Nelson EA, Bradley MD. Dressings and topical agents for arterial leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(1):CD001836.
22. Gottrup F, Apelqvist J, Price P.Outcomes in controlled and comparative studies on non-healing wounds: rec­ommendations to improve the quality of evidence in wound management. J Wound Care. 2010;19:237–68.
23. Woo KY, Sibbald RG. The improvement of wound­associated pain and healing trajectory with a com­prehensive foot and leg ulcer care model. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009;36:184–91. quiz 92–3
310
J. Aschwanden et al.
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial­NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc- nd/4.0/), which permits any non­commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if you modied the licensed material. You do not have permission under this license to share adapted material derived from this chapter or parts of it.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Prevention ofSkin Necrosis inCosmetic Medicine
HuguesCartier, LeonieSchelke, andPeterVelthuis
49

49.1 Introduction

Aesthetic medicine is a constantly evolving eld, which includes minimally invasive treatments, i.e., considered as nonsurgical.
Nevertheless, the current evolution makes some procedures more intrusive.
Most of the patients treated are healthy people looking for an aesthetic improvement, so the treatments performed must be as safe as possible.
This treatment cannot be done without a medi­cal diagnosis, a precise history, informed infor­mation, and a choice of treatment options to be weighed against a benet-risk ratio.
49.1.1 Aesthetic Procedures
49.1.2 Filling Products
Filling products play a signicant role in aes­thetic medicine. The rheology of the products has not stopped evolving over the last 20 years. Fortunately, nonabsorbable products such as sili-
H. Cartier (*) Saint-Jean Dermatologic Center, Arras, France
L. Schelke · P. Velthuis Dermatology Department, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands e-mail: leonie.schelke@cutaneous.org; p.velthuis@
erasmusmc.nl
cone, Gore-Tex, and acrylamides have been banned in Europe.
At present, four types of products that inte­grate well into the cutaneous and subcutaneous tissue and that are slowly resorbable can be iden­tied: hyaluronic acid, calcium hydroxyapatite, polycaprolactone, and polylactic acid, which is in the form of powder to be diluted in sterile water.
Of these four lling or collagen stimulation products, only hyaluronic acid can be dissolved rapidly with hyaluronidase in case of complica­tions (such as bad placement, accumulation of product, associated infection, sterile inamma­tory reaction, or vascular occlusion).
The major complication is vascular occlusion or compression. At best, they cause cutaneous and subcutaneous suffering that is resolved thanks to the contiguous arterial network. At worst, they cause extensive and deep necrosis in the vascularized area. Cases of occlusion of the central retinal artery with loss of ocular function due to migration of the product in the blood­stream are fortunately rare compared to the num­ber of injections performed every day in the world but nevertheless regularly reported and published.
Vascular complication can occur at any time, especially since needles or ne cannulas are used that can easily perforate an artery. The reason for this is simple: even though all doctors who per­form injections of lling products must know the facial anatomy, injections are done blindly. We do have the blood aspiration test technique, but it
© The Author(s) 2024 L. Téot et al. (eds.), Skin Necrosis, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60954-1_49
311
312
H. Cartier et al.
is far from reliable. To date, only ultrasound imaging, a dynamic, noninvasive examination to be used prior to injection, can supply an answer, but it requires training, a certain amount of dex­terity, and adequate equipment. The world of aes­thetics is discovering this technique, which cannot guarantee to ban this complication but contributes to reducing this risk [1].
Venous embolisms rarely cause skin suffering at rst because they are diluted in the general vas­cular system. However, there have been reports of cavernous sinus thrombosis in facial injections and pulmonary embolism in genital or gluteal injections with massive quantities of ller.
The cutaneous signs of arterial vascular com­plications are with important variations:
– Immediate pain like a cramp – Immediate or delayed blanching extending as
a livedoid pattern
– Progressive cyanosis of the skin that may look
like bruises but may not be declining but
ascending
– Pustules, inammation that may resemble the
false vesicular eruptions of herpes or shingles
– Cyanotic suffering with extensive tissue
necrosis depending on the vascular territory
49.1.3 Lifting Eect or Collagen
Stimulation by Threads
A distinction is made between absorbable and nonabsorbable threads. In themselves, the threads only cause a conned inammation around them. Depending on their characteristics, the threads can also pull the skin to give this tensor effect.
Intrinsically, they do not cause skin necrosis, but a cutaneous or subcutaneous injury. This tear­ing of the tissues during their introduction under the skin by needles of varying lengths induces microtrauma, even more so since they are armed with small spines allowing for better xation and maintenance over time. Avoid combination with radiofrequency to stimulate neocollagenesis because it induces more exaggerated inamma­tory responses such as development of nodular panniculitis and adipocyte necrosis [2].
Moreover, the number of threads accumulated under the skin can cause vascular breaches and poor tissue integration. We have seen cutaneous suffering and even necrosis, particularly on the nose.
49.1.4 Laser andEBD
In general, the effect of lasers and EBD treatment is mediated by controlled damage to tissue. After this, regeneration occurs that should lead to an improved appearance [3].
49.1.4.1 Ablative Lasers
Ablative lasers are represented by the CO2 laser and the erbium-YAG laser.
They cause vaporization of the epidermis and middle dermis in resurfacing mode. In fraction­ated mode, ablative lasers cause micro-wells that perforate the skin to a depth of up to 3.5 mm. This is a focused necrosis that forms just around the well due to the brutal heating of the skin tis­sue. This is normally a controlled burn if the energy delivered and the density of the points that are juxtaposed are not too high. The higher these two parameters are, the greater the thermal trauma. The burn is then uncontrollable, leading to skin necrosis and consequently to vicious, anged, and hypochromic scars.
The skin structure plays a key role because the tissue regeneration is induced by this skin vapor­ization and the thermal effect. Thus, the healing process is very variable depending on the type of the skin, its age, and density in pilosebaceous appendages and in vascular network that contrib­utes to it. Outside the face, the risk of burning is increased since densities of these structures are much less.
49.1.4.2 Non-ablative Thermal Lasers
Non-ablative lasers induce a thermal effect that is supposed to regenerate the dermis. There are numerous devices, fractionated or not. If too much heat is accumulated, the effect of the laser radia­tion can cause skin suffering up to the point of skin necrosis. This is nevertheless rare and related to a bad use or an error of parameterization.
49 Prevention ofSkin Necrosis inCosmetic Medicine
313
49.1.4.3 Vascular Lasers
We distinguish the KTP laser, the pulsed dye laser, the vascular diode, the yellow laser, the pulsed lights with vascular lter, and the long­pulse Nd-YAG laser.
Vascular lasers are characterized by wave­lengths that are preferentially absorbed by the redness of the skin. It is important to distinguish skin redness from inammation, which is rarely a good indication for vascular lasers.
In fact, all vascular lasers cause inammation that should not be added to an already existing inammation.
This inammation causes an edema that will vary according to the type of laser and its photon energy setting, the size of the vascular target to be destroyed, and the intrinsic drainage of the skin in each case or according to the site treated.
In addition, depending on the type of laser and the adjustment of emission time and energy, a purpura can be seen in the presence of purple spots that will fade in 5–10 days.
The burn is the consequence of an excessive accumulation of energy with a dispersion of the heat that is not well done. We can therefore have a surface epidermolysis, which is to say a blow­out or a real cutaneous necrosis which will leave a hypochromic scar.
On tanned or self-tanning skin or for a photo­type above III on the Fitzpatrick scale, there is an increased risk of burning and reactive hyperpigmentation.
Special mention should be made of the long­pulse Nd-YAG laser, which delivers very high light energy and should be used with caution, as it induces the most dermal necrosis with system­atic scarring.
49.1.4.4 Pigment Lasers
A distinction is made between hair removal lasers and those used to erase sunspots or tattoos. The wavelengths are identical, but it is the emission time of the laser beam that will change.
For tattoos, we can only use picosecond or nanosecond lasers. The energy delivered must be high enough to burst the tattoo pigment and dis­solve it progressively. Other pigment lasers
deliver their photonic energy in milliseconds. If these are used for tattoos, they will systemati­cally cause skin necrosis by deep burning. Indeed, the instantaneous accumulation of dermal pig­ment in tattoos is so important and brutal that the skin does not have time to disperse the heat.
For laser hair removal, the laser radiation fol­lows the hair like an electric current follows a conducting wire. The heat accumulation causes its destruction, but if the skin is tanned, covered with self-tanner or on phototype beyond IV on the Fitzpatrick scale, then the photons will also be absorbed by the skin surface which by itself becomes a target and causes a surface burn, from epidermolysis to dermolysis. And thus, at best a hypochromia and at worst a burn will occur which will be deep enough to leave denitive hypochromic scars. In these cases, Nd-YAG long-pulse lasers or hair removal diodes are rec­ommended, unlike alexandrite and pulsed light lasers.
For sunspots, all these lasers can be used, and it is only a question of setting and wavelength. The spots will turn into small supercial scabs that will disintegrate in a few days without leav­ing any trace. A deeper burn is in most cases sec­ondary to a bad use of the device.
49.1.4.5 Radiofrequency
Radiofrequency is an electric current that dis­perses heat according to its operating mode. Contact with a handpiece that is swept over the skin surface accumulates local heat and causes tissue remodeling. Fractional radiofrequency aims to place contact microelectrodes on the sur­face of the skin to induce dermal-epidermal micro-bulges and nally radiofrequency with microneedles. The microneedles penetrate the skin up to 4mm deep; they are protected up to the tip or not, depending on the device.
The electrical effect causes skin coagulation, tissue, and vascular damage, which is supposed to regenerate the skin. Too long an emission time, too much energy, and repetition of passages can cause tissue damage. From the spike scar to the loss of skin substance by dermal-epidermal burn, everything is possible but rare.
314
H. Cartier et al.
49.1.5 EBD
49.1.5.1 LEDs
The diodes juxtaposed on a panel are athermal. The mode of operation therefore does not cause skin necrosis unless they are used to activate a photosensitizing substance. In this case, they contribute to cause it. LEDs emit in the visible spectrum and therefore do not contain UV radiation.
49.1.5.2 High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU)
Focused ultrasound concentrates its energy on a focal point at 1.5mm, 3mm, 4.5mm, 6mm, or more. The sudden rise in temperature causes coagulation and punctual necrosis in the form of aligned micro-points. Paresis due to nerve dam­age has been seen.
Used to obtain a rming and tensing effect on the oval of the face, it is necessary to multiply the lines of points to obtain a result. The closer the lines of stitches are to each other, the more skin suffering is induced.
Skin burns are rare unless the handpiece is not applied correctly to the skin.
49.1.5.3 Cryolipolysis
Cryolipolysis is based on the freezing of a vol­ume of skin and fat caught in a vacuum cham­ber. The combination of cold, up to 12°C, and suction to x the volume to be melted by destroying the adipocytes has proved its medi­cal interest with numerous publications to sup­port it. Nevertheless, many devices have appeared on the world market of aesthetic med­icine and aesthetic centers of nondoctors. Medical ability is necessary to avoid complica­tions such as thermal burns caused by the cold. Cases of surface burns and even skin necrosis of the bedsore type have even been reported. They are much more frequent when the tem­perature descent is not progressive, when the skin contact interface has been forgotten or is not conrmed for this use, or when the duration of the cold and the suction force is not adapted to the volume of the fat mass.
49.1.6 Peelings
49.1.6.1 Epidermal Peel
The leader in epidermal peels is glycolic acid. All its exfoliating agents can give epidermolysis, rarely deeper burns.
49.1.6.2 Medium andDeep Dermal Peels
They are essentially represented by trichloroace­tic acid and phenol associated with croton oil. These peels are of varying concentrations and pH. They aim at provoking a dermal-epidermal regeneration. Incorrect use, i.e., too many appli­cations and too high a concentration, can cause serious burns with permanent scarring. Learning to use them is essential to set limits to their use.
It should be remembered that healthy skin serves as a natural protection, if one causes skin breaches.
49.1.7 Other Injectable Active
Ingredients
Mesotherapy with unsuitable products can cause skin necrosis at the injection site, as can deoxy­cholate, a chemical agent designed to destroy localized fatty areas.

49.2 Complications

Complications are multiple but essentially inammatory, scarring, and infectious.
49.2.1 Inammation
andPigmentation
The inammation caused by all the techniques mentioned above is a normal phenomenon that is the consequence of any trauma. This normal pro­cess is gradually reduced, but if it persists, it can cause a resurgence of pigment on the surface, hypersensitivity, or sensitive skin. It is mainly embarrassing but does not lead to tissue destruc­tion but can give way to brosis.