Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5191_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
68 Мб
Скачать
194
K. Zarchi et al.
Secondary lesions include cutaneous ulcer­ations, pyogenic granulomas, and hypertrophic scars, with the latter appearing as indurated plaques or linearly ropelike scars. In contrast to closed comedones, which never occur in HS-affected areas, multiple, big, open comedones (the so-called tombstone comedones) may be seen in previously active areas.
Biopsies are rarely needed as the diagnosis is based on the clinical presentation; nonetheless, in some cases, differentiation from other skin dis­eases, such as pyoderma gangrenosum and cuta­neous Crohn’s disease, might be difcult and require histopathological investigations. The characteristic histological ndings include fol­licular hyperplasia and hyperkeratosis, local inltration of inammatory cells, formation of sinus tracts, and presence of necrosis. Microbiological examinations most frequently fail to identify pathogens [2].
Fig. 27.1 Hurley stage II characterized by recurrent nod­ules and abscesses, formation of sinus tracts, and scarring. At this stage, zone with normal skin remains
Fig. 27.2 Hurley stage III characterized by diffuse involvement of the area with multiple interconnected sinus tracts
tiple interconnected sinus tracts (Fig.27.2) [4]. The majority of patients suffer from mild disease corre­sponding to stages I and II, while a smaller propor­tion progresses to severe disease which usually predominates in hospital populations.

27.3 Pathophysiology

The folliculo-pilosebaceous unit is the primary focus of the pathologic processes involved in hidradenitis suppurativa. The etiology of HS is multifactorial, encompassing genetic and envi­ronmental factors, lifestyle, hormonal status, and microbiota. These factors lead to immune activa­tion around the terminal hair follicles and hyper­keratosis (thickening of the horny layer) in the infundibulum. Different theories have been pro­posed to explain the pathogenesis. These include the suggestion of an immune response dysfunc­tion, as it has been proposed that the disease is a result of an inappropriate immunologic response to the normal skin ora, similar to the pathogenic processes involved in Crohn’s disease. Indeed, elevated levels of proinammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-1β, and involvement of the interleu­kin- 12–interleukin-23 pathway have been shown [2, 5].
Further, the lack of expression of human beta­defensin- 2, an important antimicrobial peptide of the innate immune system against Gram-negative bacteria, in HS lesions supports this theory.
27 Hidradenitis Suppurativa
195
However, the histopathological ndings in early disease and investigations of basal membrane zone in the folliculo-pilosebaceous unit point towards a structural defect in the sebofollicular junction as the possible main cause [6]. It is hypothesized that mechanical trauma makes the structurally defective folliculo-pilosebaceous unit release keratin and other mediators, thereby triggering inammation and inducing tissue destruction and necrosis.
The possibility of HS being a defect in wound healing has also been discussed. It has been hypothesized that whereas breaches of the follic­ular epithelium are common following infections or physical trauma, the perpetuation of the subse­quent inammatory process which could lead to HS is not. It may, therefore, be speculated that a disturbed wound-healing process following the inammatory stage occurs as a major factor in HS.This theory is supported by the detection of highly elevated levels of matrix metalloprotein­ase- 2 in keratinocytes, broblasts, sweat glands, and hair follicles in lesional HS skin, indicating dysregulated tissue repair and reconstruction fol­lowing unspecic tissue damage [7].

27.4 Treatment

Treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa is often a challenge [8]. By the time the diagnosis is made, most patients have been treated with short-term antibiotic regimens for several years without experiencing any effect, as the lesions are com­monly misinterpreted as furunculosis or common abscesses. Establishing a strong alliance with the patient, attempting to restore the patient’s faith in the doctor-patient relationship, and explaining the uctuating nature of the disease are highly benecial in minimizing the risk of low patient compliance. This is especially important in the case of resistant disease, where several therapeu­tic approaches might be carried out until the one or the combination inducing sufcient improve­ment is found.
Mild disease is often managed with topical therapy, such as topical clindamycin, or occa­sional intralesional glucocorticoid injections.
However, in case of moderate to severe disease, topical agents are inadequate and systemic ther­apy is usually indicated. Systemic treatment options include oral antibiotics with immuno­modulatory properties such as tetracycline, doxy­cycline, clindamycin, and rifampicin; antiandrogenic therapies; and systemic immuno­suppressive therapy, including tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors [1, 2]. Adalimumab was the rst FDA- and EMA-licensed biologic agent for the management of moderate to severe HS. Immunomodulation targeting IL-1, IL-12/ Th1, and IL-23/Th17 pathways is rapidly becom­ing the cornerstone of therapy for moderate to severe HS.
In elements refractory to medical treatment and in the presence of scarred lesions, surgery, nonetheless, is a mainstay of therapy. Surgical approaches include exteriorization (“deroong” of sinus tract, abscesses, and cysts [Fig. 27.3]) and surgical excision of lesional skin, with radi­cal excisions being associated with lower recur­rence rates. Alternatively, destruction of lesional hair-bearing skin is achieved using ablative CO2 laser [9]. The surgical and ablative laser approaches are based on the removal/destruction of the cutaneous structures involved in the dis­ease, thereby causing open wounds requiring clo­sure or management.
Primary suture, skin graft, or ap reconstruc­tion can be used to close the wounds depending on the extent of procedure, or closure may be achieved by secondary intention. Generally, sec-
Fig. 27.3 “Deroong” of a sinus tract
196
K. Zarchi et al.
ondary intention healing is recommended for all but the smallest excisions. A comparison of skin grafting versus closure by secondary intention using foam dressing in patients undergoing bilat­eral excision revealed that skin grafting led to more rapid healing; however, closure by second­ary intention provided good cosmetic results and avoided the need for immobilization and a pain­ful donor side and was preferred by the patients [10]. Long-term evaluation of healing by secondary intention suggests acceptable to excel­lent outcome qualities.
Secondary healing requires suitable bandag­ing for periods of up to 12weeks. Since the dis­ease affects concave surfaces of the body, it presents a practical challenge. Appropriate non­adherent dressings, such as foams, silicone­coated dressings, alginates, and hydrocolloids, are generally better suited to convex surfaces. Bandage type may be adjusted during the healing process as per normal practice; for example, the initial combination of a saline gel and a silicone dressing may be gradually replaced by silicone dressing and ultimately a simple bandage to pro­tect the nal epithelialization of the wound. Individual adjustments may need to be per­formed, and once the wound is fully covered by granulation tissue, some patients prefer to avoid bandages all together. This non-recommended patient behavior most likely reects the patients’ experience with chronic suppurating preopera­tive lesions.
Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) may be used to promote angiogenesis of the underlying subcu­taneous tissue, reduce bacterial counts, and stabi­lize skin grafts. VAC has been successfully used in the treatment of large postoperative wounds.
lems to the patients such as pain, tenderness, visible scars, suppuration, and malodor; hence, therapeutic decisions should address all those issues. Effective bandaging represents one of the challenges. Bandages should provide a secure and comfortable barrier against malodor­ous leakage and be absorbent to prevent macera­tion of the skin, easy to use, and inexpensive [11, 12]. Currently, no bandage meets all these requirements, and the available solutions are, therefore, combinations of products that are both expensive and difcult to apply to inverse area. As a consequence, patients are often forced to turn towards alternative and inexpensive solu­tions such as sanitary pads, which are not designed for this purpose (Fig.27.4). The mor­bidity due to HS is such that this issue of adju­vant therapy warrants more attention by healthcare providers than it currently receives. It is strongly recommended to address the practi­cal problems of this hitherto neglected group of patients by providing appropriate attention to improved adjuvant therapy.

27.5 Adjuvant Therapy

Although the primary aim of therapy remains the elimination or a substantial reduction in the inammatory activities and the excision of severely involved lesional skin, providing adju­vant therapy throughout the disease course is necessary to improve the patients’ quality of life. The disease presents many practical prob-
Fig. 27.4 Many HS patients are forced to use sanitary pads due to the lack of inexpensive appropriate dressings
27 Hidradenitis Suppurativa
197

27.6 Conclusion

Although HS is an inammatory skin disease, wound care is important in the treatment. Adjuvant therapy is an important aspect of this highly disturbing disease, because it provides both safe symptom management and patient empowerment. Most patients are left to their own initiatives due to lack of appropriate dressing materials, and when patients present in wound care clinics for treatment, they constitute a chal­lenge for many.

References

1. Jemec GB. Clinical practice. Hidradenitis suppura­tiva. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(2):158–64.
2. Sabat R, Jemec GB, Matusiak L, Kimbal AB, Prens E, Wolk K. Hidradenitis Suppurativa. Nat Rev. 2020;6:18.
3. Von der Werth JM, Jemec GB.Morbidity in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol. 2001;144:809–13.
4. Hurley H. Dermatologic surgery, principles and practice. In: Roenigk RK, Roenigk HH, editors. Dermatologic surgery, principles and practice. NewYork: Marcel Dekker; 1989. p.729–39.
5. van der Zee HH, de Ruiter L, van den Broecke DG, Dik WA, Laman JD, Prens EP. Elevated levels of
tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-10 in hidradenitis suppurativa skin: a ratio­nale for targeting TNF-α and IL-1β. Br J Dermatol. 2011;164(6):1292–8.
6. Danby FW, Jemec GB, Marsch WC, von Laffert M. Preliminary ndings suggest hidradenitis suppu­rativa may be due to defective follicular support. Br J Dermatol. 2013;168(5):1034–9.
7. Mozeika E, Pilmane M, Nürnberg BM, Jemec GB.Tumour necrosis factor-alpha and matrix metal­loproteinase- 2 are expressed strongly in hidradenitis suppurativa. Acta Derm Venereol. 2013;93(3):301–4.
8. Zarchi K, Dufour DN, Jemec GB. Successful treat­ment of severe hidradenitis suppurativa with anakinra. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(10):1192–4.
9. Hazen PG, Hazen BP.Hidradenitis suppurativa: suc­cessful treatment using carbon dioxide laser exci­sion and marsupialization. Dermatologic Surg. 2010;36(2):208–13.
10. Morgan WP, Harding KG, Hughes LE.A comparison of skin grafting and healing by granulation, following axillary excision for hidradenitis suppurativa. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1983;65(4):235–6.
11. Chopra D, Anand N, Brito S, Coutts P, George R, Kimball A, Kirsner RS, Alavi A and Lev-Tov Hadaar. Wound Care for patients with hidradenitis suppura­tiva : recommendations of an international panel of experts, J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023;89(6):1289-1292.
12. Ragozo NM, Masson R, Gillenwater TJ, Hsiao JL SVY. Emerging treatment and the clinical trial land­scape for hidradenitis suppurativa—Part II: pro­cedural and wound care therapies. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023;13:1699–720.
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial­NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc- nd/4.0/), which permits any non­commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if you modied the licensed material. You do not have permission under this license to share adapted material derived from this chapter or parts of it.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Martorell Hypertensive Ischemic Ulcer

SylvieMeaume andHesterColboc
28
Martorell hypertensive ischemic ulcer, also called necrotic angiodermatitis (NA), represents a par­ticular type of leg ulcer with a specic clinical presentation, histopathological appearance, and therapeutic management. Its origin is indepen­dent of an underlying venous or arterial pathol­ogy, but, on the other hand, it is linked to the deleterious action of arterial hypertension on the cutaneous microvascularization. NA was men­tioned for the rst time in 1945 by Martorell, a Spanish cardiologist who described the rst clini­cal cases and observed the relationship with arte­rial hypertension [1].

28.1 Epidemiology

NA is not an exceptional condition (9–15% of leg ulcers) [24] but is often overlooked and poses problems of differential diagnosis with calciphy­laxis, pyoderma gangrenosum, and certain vascu­litis. The female sex seems predominant (61–70%) [2, 3] with an age usually above 60years [2, 4]. Hypertension is present in nearly 100% of cases, diabetes in 30–50%, and chronic smoking in 20% of cases [4].
S. Meaume (*) · H. Colboc Department of Geriatric and wound care, Rothschild University Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France e-mail: sylvie.meaume@aphp.fr

28.2 Etiopathogenesis

The pathophysiology of NA is not fully eluci­dated at present. The invivo vascularization of NA was compared to that of arterial ulcers using a scintigraphic method [5]. Lower tissue perfu­sion than in patients with arterial disease has been identied and explained by increased arte­riolar resistance. This hypoperfusion would be responsible for local ischemia and necrosis.
In another pathogenetic hypothesis, NA would be a “cutaneous vascular accident” caused by hypotensive episodes in patients on poly­medicated therapy for their arterial hypertension and with a pathological arteriolar network [6].
Finally, other authors put forward a hypothe­sis of paradoxical hypercoagulation phenomena, in a context of anticoagulation with antivitamin K [4].

28.3 Clinical Diagnosis

NA has a characteristic monomorphic clinical expression, but there is a diagnostic delay of sev­eral weeks. It has a sudden post-traumatic onset in 25–50% of cases [3, 4]. The onset is a purplish macula, a bulla, or a hemorrhagic crust with a purpuric periphery, which rapidly transforms into a supercial necrotic plaque with characteristic jagged and livedoid inammatory edges of vari­able sizes between 10 and 20cm2 (Fig.28.1). The extension of this supercial ulcer is rapid
© The Author(s) 2024 L. Téot et al. (eds.), Skin Necrosis, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60954-1_28
199
200
ab
Fig. 28.1 (a) NA in the early stage of necrosis (b) NA with central wound and peripheric necrosis
S. Meaume and H. Colboc
The preferential location of the NA is the lower third of the leg. The lesions can be single or multiple, and sometimes bilateral and symmetri­cal. Variable inammatory outbreaks with ser­piginous ulcerative extension may follow one another with the appearance of satellite elements. Changes in position, lowering of the limb, rest, or elevation, do not relieve the pain, which is an important semiological element. A deep evolu­tion with necrosis of the subcutaneous tissues down to the muscle fascia and exposure of the
Fig. 28.2 Characteristic livedoid skin around NA necrosis
tendons is possible but rare, mainly the Achilles’ tendon (13% of patients) [3]. Distal arteriopathy is not usually hemodynamically signicant but can accompany NA in 40% of cases as comorbid­ity. Chronic venous insufciency can be associ­ated in 25–40% of cases and has to be managed with compression bandages if ankle-brachial pressure index is correct [4]. Spontaneous evolu­tion of NA is towards stabilization and then regression centripetal. A scar is sometimes visi­ble after spontaneous regression of the lesions.

28.4 Histopathology

Fig. 28.3 NA : extensive supercial necrosis
(Figs.28.2 and 28.3). The ulcers are spontane­ously hyperalgic and usually require quick trans­fer to a hospital to manage pain. The painful character with paroxysms is an essential element of the diagnosis.
Biopsy is not mandatory if the clinical diagnosis is certain [2]. The histological picture is not spe­cic but allows a diagnostic orientation. Above all, it makes it possible to eliminate a differential diagnosis. It is recommended to perform a skin biopsy in an area of normal skin at the periphery
ab
28 Martorell Hypertensive Ischemic Ulcer
201
Fig. 28.4 Histopathology of NA, hematoxylin–eosin– saffron stained: (a) arteriolosclerosis with reduction of lumen of subcutaneous arterioles in NA. (b)
of the ulceration and at the level of the area of necrosis. If a biopsy is performed in the necrosis, deep and extensive hemorrhagic crust associated with arteriolar and venular thrombosis can be observed. If a peri-ulcer biopsy is performed, it shows unspecic thickening of the media of small-caliber arterioles and muscular arteries in the dermis and hypodermis (arteriolosclerosis of dermal vessels) (Fig.28.4).
Arteriolosclerosis with asymmetrical brous intimal thickening, here associated to calcication of the internal elastic lamina and media (courtesy of Dr Moguelet)
nation with neutrophil-rich dermal inltration and signs of vasculitis. Any mechanical cleansing is prohibited due to the phenomena of pathergy.
Calciphylaxis, also called calcium arteriolop­athy, is a rare pathology associated with high morbidity that most often appears in the context of end-stage chronic renal failure in a dialysis or transplant patient. It is characterized by the asso­ciation of vascular calcications related to a phosphocalcic imbalance, with cutaneous necro­sis. The clinic is marked by the appearance of
28.5 Dierential Diagnoses
indurated and painful livedoid plaques with live­doid purpura and deep central necrosis within the
NA poses problems of differential diagnosis with other vascular diseases. Diagnosis is usually based on the characteristic clinical appearance in the absence of underlying venous or arterial etiol­ogy, except in cases where these conditions may be associated. Extreme pain and skin necrosis exclude the diagnosis of venous ulcer, and the absence of claudication and supercial trophic disorders is not in favor of an arterial ulcer.
Pyoderma gangrenosum is differentiated from NA by the presence of peripheral purulent pits, sunken “mined” edges, and cribriform scars, as well as a characteristic histopathological exami-
plaques. Cutaneous lesions have a predilection for regions rich in adipose tissue such as the abdomen and the root of the thighs in the proxi­mal form of uremic calciphylaxis. Less com­monly, they appear on the legs, constituting the distal form of uremic calciphylaxis [3]. A variant of non-uremic calciphylaxis has been described, in the absence of renal or parathyroid pathology, but is on the other hand often associated with two cardiovascular risk factors: arterial hypertension and diabetes. Patients may have other serious comorbidities such as cancers or hepatic cirrho­sis. The clinic is also marked by extensive, deep,
202
bc
ab
S. Meaume and H. Colboc
and hyperalgesic necrotic lesions of the abdomen, breasts, or thighs. Treatment is difcult, and mor­tality is high: 40–60% of cases [3].
The other differential diagnoses are thrombos­ing conditions (cryoglobulinemia, antiphospho­lipid syndrome, thrombophilia, etc.), cutaneous vasculitis, and infectious or drug-induced ulcers.

28.6 Evolution

The evolution can be marked by successive out­breaks with recurrences in 60–80% of cases. These occur in other territories or on the contra­lateral limb. The local prognosis is on the other hand rather favorable, with the rate of amputation being less than 1%.
28.7 Treatment ofNA
1. The use of analgesics is essential not only for
the comfort of the patient but also for a better realization of the care. Although skin grafting
remains the main means of relieving the patient, the patient should generally be admin­istered WHO level II or III analgesics as soon as possible. The use of morphine is often nec­essary and must be quickly instituted. Neuropathic analgesic treatments can be asso­ciated (pregabalin, tricyclic antidepressants) because of the neuropathic component associ­ated with the pain of NA.Faced with pain that is resistant to conventional medical treat­ments, the use of nitrous oxide at the time of care and the use of nerve blocks via a perineu­ral catheter may be necessary.
2. Skin grafts (Figs.28.5 and 28.6) currently repre- sent the “gold standard” of NA treatment. This benecial therapeutic effect of skin grafting was described in 1995 [7]. This involves pinch skin graft or mesh graft, performed after mechanical or autolytic debridement of necrotic tissue. They must be carried out as soon as possible when the diagnosis is evoked. The common results obtained on the grafts in the NA conrm the effectiveness on pain with analgesic withdrawal in 8days, disappearance of the peripheral pur-
a
Fig. 28.5 Pinch graft procedure: (a) preparation of the donor site (inner side of the thigh) and of the material. (b) Grafts harvesting. (c) Grafts placement
Fig. 28.6 Evolution of pinch graft on a typical NA. (a) Before pinch graft. (b) Day 4 pinch grafts
28 Martorell Hypertensive Ischemic Ulcer
203
plish halo in 8 days, and complete healing in 30–45 days on average. This effectiveness is demonstrated if the transplants are early and repeated (ref à ajouter) [3, 8, 9].
3. Wound care, as an alternative treatment of NA, is centered on the autolytic debridement of the cutaneous necrosis, and using suitable dressings such as hydrogels, irrigoabsorbents, alginates, or hydrobers, depending on the degree of exudate and the quality of the sur­rounding skin of the wound, can be proposed.
Strong to very strong local topical corticoste- roids used around the ulcer on the inamed
areas in the absence of signs of local infection are prescribed in order to reduce the extension of the lesion. Electrostimulation techniques have been proposed in the NA.They allow a debridement of necrotic and brinous wounds and above all have an analgesic effect [10]. Negative-pressure therapy has been proposed pre- or post-skin graft [3]. However, medical measures alone only allow healing in 6% of cases according to Hafner et al. [3] and 10–25% of cases according to Senet [11], which underlines the fundamental role of skin grafting in the treatment of NA.

28.8 Other Treatments

The preventive measures of NA essentially con­cern the control of arterial pressure, which should not vary too much over time. In case of associa­tion with venous insufciency, compression ban­dage must be associated. It also stabilizes the grafts and often allows faster healing. Cessation of smoking and nonselective beta-blockers is often recommended [2].

28.9 Conclusion

NA is a non-exceptional cause of leg ulcer but too often overlooked and often leads to late diagno­sis. It is a very painful arteriolar ulcer, difcult to
treat and which has a negative impact on the patient’s quality of life. Management is based on pain management, blood pressure control, and mechanical or autolytic debridement followed by skin grafting.

References

1. Martorell F. Las ulceras supramaleolares por arte­riolitis de las grandes hipertensas. Actas (Reunion Cientica Cuerpo Facultad). Instituto Policlinico Barcelona. 1945;1(1):6–9.
2. Vuerstaek JDD, Reeder SWI, Henquet CJM, H. a. M.Neumann. Arteriolosclerotic ulcer of Martorell. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010;24(8):867–74.
3. Hafner J, Nobbe S, Partsch H, Läuchli S, Mayer D, Amann-Vesti B, Speich R, Schmid C, Burg G, French LE. Martorell hypertensive ischemic leg ulcer: a model of ischemic subcutaneous arteriolosclerosis. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146(9):961–8.
4. Nicol P, Bernard P, Nguyen P, Durlach A, Perceau G. Retrospective study of hypertensive leg ulcers at Reims university hospital: epidemiologi­cal, clinical, disease progression data, effects of vitamin K antagonists. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2017;144(1):37–44.
5. Duncan HJ, Faris IB.Martorell’s hypertensive isch­emic leg ulcers are secondary to an increase in the local vascular resistance. J Vasc Surg. 1985;2(4):581–4.
6. Saadallah S, Couillet D, Richard M, Vaisse B, Guillaume JC, Grob JJ, etal. L’angiodermite nécro­tique, un « accident vasculaire cutané » par hypoten­sion brutale sur une artériolopathie hypertensive ? Étude ouverte prospective preliminaire. Annales de Dermatologie et Venereologie. 2000;127:4S8-9.
7. Lazareth I, Priollet P. Necrotic angiodermatitis: treatment by early cutaneous grafts. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1995;122(9):575–8.
8. Dagregorio G, Guillet G.A retrospective review of 20 hypertensive leg ulcers treated with mesh skin grafts. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006 Feb;20(2):166–9.
9. El Khatib K, Danino A, Rzin A, Malka G. Necrotic angiodermatitis: evaluation of an early skin graft treatment. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2009;54(6):567–70.
10. Leloup P, Toussaint P, Lembelembe JP, Célérier P, Maillard H. The analgesic effect of electrostimula­tion (WoundEL®) in the treatment of leg ulcers. Int Wound J. 2015;12(6):706–9.
11. Senet P, Vicaut E, Beneton N, Debure C, Lok C, Chosidow O. Topical treatment of hypertensive leg ulcers with platelet-derived growth factor­ BB: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Dermatol. 2011;147(8):926–30.
204
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial­NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc- nd/4.0/), which permits any non­commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if you modied the licensed material. You do not have permission under this license to share adapted material derived from this chapter or parts of it.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
S. Meaume and H. Colboc