Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_6012_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
93 Мб
Скачать
Chapter 2 Applied Anatomy of the Spine 33
within the spinal canal have engendered much argument, however, particularly concerning the segmental range of the individual nerve ramications.
In illustrations based on dissections, Bogduk and col­leagues44 and Parke52 agreed that each nerve supplies two intervertebral discs via superiorly and inferiorly directed branches—the inferiorly directed branch ramifying over the dorsum of the disc at the level of entry and the longer, supe­riorly directed branch coursing along the edge of the posterior longitudinal ligament to reach the disc of the next superior level (Fig. 2.20). Dissections identify mainly the larger rami­cations. Smaller bers are usually localized with staining techniques. Conventional methods of staining using silver or lipotrophic stains have given controversial results, however, because of a lack of specicity.
Groen and colleagues,53 using a highly specic acetyl­cholinesterase staining method on large cleared sections of fetal human spines, resolved many conicts concerning the
1
2
3
4
5
12
11
10
FIG. 2.20 Schema of major intraspinal distribution of dorsal central
branches of segmental vertebromedullary arteries and distribution and source of the sinuvertebral nerves. The pattern of the nerve shown entering the superior foramen is derived from the data provided by Groen and colleagues.53 Dotted lines show a composite of the variant ranges (arrows indicate two or more segments) and ramications tabulated by these authors. The nerve entering the inferior foramen shows the extent and distribution described in previous reports. 1, Dorsal root ganglion. 2, Rami communicantes. 3, Sinuvertebral nerve and its origin according to Groen and colleagues. 4, Autonomic ganglion. 5, Nerve to anterior longitudinal ligament. 6, Spinal nerve roots. 7, Sinuvertebral nerve arising from distal pole of ganglion (thought to be its most common source before report of Groen and colleagues). 8, Dorsal primary ramus of spinal nerve. 9, Ventral primary ramus of spinal nerve. 10, Arteries entering basivertebral sinus to supply cancellous bone. 11, Descending dorsal central branch of vertebromedullary (spinal) artery. 12, Ventral branch of vertebromedullary artery.
6
7
8
9
ramications of the nerves supplying spinal structures. ey found that, in contrast to most previous reports, the human sinuvertebral nerves were almost exclusively derivatives of the rami communicantes close to their connections with the spinal nerves. ese origins were fairly consistent throughout the length of the thoracolumbar sympathetic trunk, but in the cervical region they were also derived from the perivascular plexus of the vertebral artery.
Five sinuvertebral nerves have been observed passing into one intervertebral foramen. Typically, the group consists of one thick nerve (perhaps the one seen in most conventional dissections) and several ne bers. e thick, or predominant, sinuvertebral nerve is oen absent, however, in the upper cervical and sacral regions. e major sinuvertebral element enters the foramen ventral to the spinal ganglion and gives o some ne branches at this point. As the nerve enters the spinal canal, the major branch usually divides into rami that course in approximation to the distribution of the posterior central branches of the segmental artery, with a long ascending element and a shorter descending one. From these branches, one to three coiled rami supply the ventral dura.
e acetylcholinesterase technique used by Groen and colleagues53 made it possible to delineate details of the plexus of the posterior longitudinal ligament. e work of these authors supports the idea that the posterior longitudinal ligament is highly innervated by an irregular plexiform dis­tribution of bers that have a greater density in the ligament expansions dorsal to the discs. ese authors were able to note the primary direction, length, and “termination area” of the branches of a single segmental sinuvertebral nerve. ey classied the variations of individual nerves as follows: (1) ascending one segment, (2) descending one segment, (3) dichotomizing toward one segment caudal and one segment cranial or horizontal, (4) ascending two or more segments, and (5) descending two or more segments (see Fig. 2.20). e existence of the latter two categories, although they are not as common as the others, shows that the sinuvertebral nerve can supply more than two adjacent segmental levels. A basis for the poor pain localization of an oending disc may be related to the generous distribution possible in the individual sinuvertebral nerve. e large totomounts treated with acetyl­cholinesterase also showed that the patterns of sinuvertebral nerve distribution to the posterior longitudinal ligament did not display signicant regional variations apart from an expected pronounced diminution in the plexus density in the immovable lower sacral region.
e posterior longitudinal ligament is highly innervated with complex encapsulated nerve endings and numerous low­myelinated free nerve endings (Fig. 2.21). e lateral expan­sion of the posterior longitudinal ligament extends through the intervertebral foramen covering all the dorsal and most of the dorsolateral aspects of the disc. e elevation of this thin, highly innervated strap of connective tissue may provide a signicant component of the pain manifest in acute disc protrusions.
e probable range of diverse functions of the sinuvertebral nerve may be indicated by the analysis of its cross-sectional composition. Stained preparations taken from a section near
SECTION
I
34 BASIC SCIENCE
AB
FIG. 2.21 Photomicrographs of nerve endings in posterior longitudinal ligament of a dog. (A) Section of
ligament dorsal to a lumbar intervertebral disc. The dark area is the central strap of the ligament, and the light area is the thin lateral expansion over the dorsum of the disc. These ne nerve endings are characteristic of those in known nociceptors. (B) Complex nerve ending from posterior longitudinal ligament. This type of ending is believed to be a transducer of mechanical deformation for postural senses. (Methylene blue vital tissue stain: [A], ×300; [B], ×500.)
the nerve origin show many small myelinated bers, although some myelin sheaths are greater than 10 µm in diameter.54 Many of the smaller bers are postganglionic eerents from the thoracolumbar autonomic ganglia that mediate the smooth muscle control of the various vascular elements within the spinal canal, and many of the larger bers are involved in proprioceptive functions. Concerning the latter, Hirsch and colleagues
46,55
found numerous complex encapsulated nerve endings in the posterior longitudinal ligament (see Fig. 2.21B). It is assumed that these may be associated with the larger myelinated bers whose postganglionic axons enter the cord to mediate postural reexes because similar bers in the cervi­cal region of cats have been shown to be important in tonic neck reexes.56 It seems, however, that the smaller bers making up the bulk of the sinuvertebral nerve are aerents, associated with simple, nonencapsulated, or “free” nerve endings that are generally regarded as nociceptive (see Fig.
2.21A).
e fact that the sinuvertebral nerve carries pain bers has been amply shown by clinical and laboratory experimentation. Direct stimulation of tissues known to be served by the nerve elicits back pain in humans. Pedersen and colleagues54 showed that stimulation of these tissues in decerebrate cats resulted in blood pressure and respiratory changes similar to those elic­ited by noxious stimuli to known pain receptors in other areas of the body.
Disagreement exists over whether the anulus itself is inner­vated and, if so, how extensively. e classic work of Hirsch and colleagues55 claimed that nerve endings are only in the dorsal aspect of the most supercial layer of the anulus, and these presumably are from branches of the same nerve bers that innervate the overlying expansions of the posterior lon­gitudinal ligament.
Pedersen and colleagues,54 Stilwell,57 and Parke52 have failed to show nerve endings in the anulus. Because the connective
of nerve endings, Parke52 assumed that their disruption could account for discogenic pain. Inappropriate methodology may
account for the failure to show intradiscal nerves. Malinsky,49 Bogduk and colleagues,
44,45
and Yoshizawa and colleagues58
published accounts showing nerve bers in the outer lamina
of the anulus. is work has now been supported by the highly specic acetylcholinesterase method of Groen and colleagues.
53
Most descriptions of the sinuvertebral nerve indicate that the major meningeal bers to the spinal dura are distributed to its ventral surface.59 e median dorsal dural surface has been regarded as virtually free of nerve bers, a convenience that permits its painless penetration during needle puncture. Although Cyriax60 claimed that irritation of the ventral dura during protrusion of the nucleus may contribute to discogenic pain, a sucient distortion of the nerve bers on the movable or unattached dura does not seem likely. e coiled congura­tion of these dural contributions of the sinuvertebral nerve, noted by Groen and colleagues,61 may indicate a compensation to permit a degree of dural movement without placing traction on these nerves.
Parke and Watanabe62 observed that the ventral lower lumbar dura is oen xed to the ventral canal surface by numerous connective tissue bers, most rmly xed at the margins of the lower lumbar discs. ese apparently acquired adhesions are not to be confused with the ligaments of Hofmann, which are normal straps of tissue connecting the dura to the ventral canal surface that have been obliquely positioned by the developmental cranial traction of the dura and its contents. is observation has been supported by a series of dissections by Blikra,63 who was seeking a rationale for lower lumbar intradural disc protrusions. His analysis showed that in some cases the dura may be suciently xed to the ventral surface of the canal, particularly at the L4–L5 level, for protruding nucleus material to rupture the ventral dura. Parke and Watanabe,62 by microscopic analysis of sec­tions of the dura that had been forcibly freed from these adhesions overlying the fourth or h lumbar disc, showed disruption of the nerve bers bound in the adhesion. In the numerous cases in which such adhesions are present, the
Chapter 2 Applied Anatomy of the Spine 35
forceful elevation of the dura by a disc protrusion may provide an adjunctive source of the discogenic pain.

Spinal Motion Segment

e inclusion of all articular tissue, the overlying spinal muscles, and the segmental contents of the vertebral canal and intervertebral foramen into a single functional and anatomic unit was rst suggested by Junghanns. “motor” segment, this unit represents a useful concept that stresses the developmental and topographic interdependence between the brous structures that surround the intervertebral foramen and the functioning of the structures that pass through it. Although the 23 or 24 individual motion segments must be considered in relation to the spinal column as a whole, no congenital or acquired disorder of a single major compo­nent of a unit can exist without aecting rst the functions of the other components of the same unit and then the functions of other levels of the spine.
Although Junghanns64 dened the unit primarily in terms of the movable structures making up the intervertebral articu­lations, a logical, if not necessary, extension of the motion segment concept should include some aspect of the vertebral elements. DePalma and Rothman66 included both adjacent vertebrae in their illustration of the unit, but depiction of the unit concept is improved by incorporating only the opposing superior and inferior halves of each vertebra, eliminating redundancy (see Fig. 2.16). In visualizing the motion segment unit as a musculoskeletal complex surrounding a correspond­ing level of nervous structures, it must be realized that the intervertebral disc and the facets are but two of the articula­tions involved. e interosseous brous connections that include the interspinous, intertransverse, costovertebral, and longitudinal ligaments and the ligamentum avum are variet­ies of syndesmoses.
64,65
Originally called the

Nutrition of the Intervertebral Disc

Most descriptive accounts of the intervertebral disc dismiss the subject of its vascular nutrition with a brief mention of the general agreement that the normal adult disc is avascular. e demonstrable truth of this statement may give the impression that the substance of the disc is inert biologically. Experimen­tal evidence has indicated that the normal disc tissue is quite vital and has a demonstrable rate of metabolic turnover. contrast to the nonvascular cartilage in the diarthroses, the cellular elements of the disc cannot receive the blood-borne nutrients through the mediation of the synovial uid but must rely on a diusional system with the vessels that lie adjacent to the disc. Diusion is also the mechanism for removal of products of metabolism from the disc, such as lactic acid.
e qualitative and quantitative aspects of the diusional nutrition of the disc have been studied. vascular plexus of the anulus and the vessels adjacent to the hyaline cartilage of the bone-disc interface provide the two sources for the diusion of metabolites into the disc. Although
68-72
e peripheral
67,68
In
69
the interface shows an average permeability of 40%, there is a decreasing centrifugal gradient that starts with an 80% perme­ability at the center. Because diusion is the major mechanism
that carries small solutes through the disc matrix, the two main parameters aecting this ow are the partition coecient, which denes the equilibrium between the solutes within the plasma and the solutes within the disc, and the diusion coef- cient, which characterizes the solute mobility.
e partition coecient varies with the size and charge of the solute particle. Small uncharged solutes show a near­equilibrium between their plasma and intradiscal concentra­tions, but because the disc matrix has a predominantly negative charge, anionic solutes have a lower intradiscal concentration in relation to the plasma, whereas the reverse is true for posi­tively charged solutes, whose intradiscal concentration is greater than that of the plasma. Because the range of these eects depends on the concentration of the xed, negatively charged, larger molecular aggregates (proteoglycans), the partition coecient is regionally variable within the disc matrix and especially pronounced in the inner annular lamel­lae and nucleus, where the concentration of proteoglycans is the highest.
Solute mobility (the diusion coecient) within the disc is slower than in the plasma because the presence of solids in the form of collagen and proteoglycans impedes diusional pro­gress. Without regard to charge, the diusion coecient within the disc is 40% to 60% of free diusion within water, and mobility is greatest in the inner anulus and nucleus where the water concentrations are the highest.
Because of the regional dierentials in the densities of the xed charges within the disc, the two vascular sources for disc nutrition vary in their signicance in the supply of certain solutes. With respect to the small uncharged particles, there is little dierence in the transport potential of either the periph­eral or the endplate vascular routes, but because of the greater collective negative charge within the central substances of the disc (from proteoglycans), the interface vasculature is a greater source of cationic solutes, whereas the anions would gain easier access through the peripheral vessels.
e eect of uid “pumping” under changes in the load applied to the disc is minimal with respect to the transport of small solutes because the matrix has a low hydraulic perme­ability relative to their higher rates of diusion. With regard to the larger solutes, however, the pumping may have a more substantial eect.
Metabolic turnover, as indicated by proteoglycan synthesis in discs in dogs, is variable according to age within the range of 2 to 3 years. It is roughly equivalent to that of articular cartilage. e central disc tissues have a low oxygen tension and a high concentration of lactic acid, indicating that the inner disc cell respiration is primarily anaerobic. Because this type of respiration is heavily dependent on glycolytic energy requirements, the interface vasculature must deliver the needed glucose to maintain the central disc cell viability.
Because this interface exchange is precariously dependent on the integrity of the ne vasculature subjacent to the carti­laginous endplate, any change from the optimal state occa­sioned by age-dependent vagaries in the intrinsic vertebral
SECTION
I
36 BASIC SCIENCE
Lumb
PCB
vasculature may partly explain the marked predisposition to degenerative changes characteristic of the aging disc. Calci­cation and sclerosis of the endplate decrease permeability and contact area with the disc space, further contributing to disc degeneration. MRI studies following the movement of contrast medium into the disc have demonstrated a decreased ability of a degenerated disc to accept solutes, both in speed and quantity.
69

Blood Supply of the Vertebral Column

VA
&
DC
CC
IC
Cerv
Thor
e descriptions and terminology of the nutritional vessels of the vertebrae vary considerably in anatomy texts. In general, the texts illustrate and discuss the vascularity of a typical tho­racic or lumbar vertebra, with a lack of agreement on such basic issues as to whether the vertebral body does73 or does not74 receive an anterior supply. In addition, discussions of the vascularization of the atypical (craniocervical, cervical, and sacral) vertebral regions are either supercial or entirely lacking. Much of the information presented here is the result of a de novo investigation by Parke and colleagues,77 and the terminology ascribed to the vessels is derived from a selection of what seem to be the most descriptive names previously used in the literature.
75-77
Despite the fact that regional variations may at rst seem to thwart the perception of a common pattern of vertebral vascularization, the homologous origin of all vertebral ele­ments nevertheless provides a certain constancy. From a segmental artery, or its regional equivalent, each vertebra receives several sets of nutritional vessels, which consist of anterior central, posterior central, prelaminar, and post­laminar branches. e rst and last of these are derived from vessels external to the vertebral column, whereas the posterior central and prelaminar branches are derived from spinal branches that enter the intervertebral foramina and supply the neural, meningeal, and epidural tissues as well. In the mid-spinal region, the internal arteries (i.e., the posterior central and prelaminar branches) provide the greater part of the blood supply to the body and vertebral arch, but recip­rocal arrangements may occur, particularly in the cervical region.
is general pattern of the vasculature is best shown in the area between the second thoracic and h lumbar vertebrae, where the segments are associated with paired arteries that arise directly from the aorta (Fig. 2.22). Typically, each seg­mental artery leaves the posterior surface of the aorta and follows a dorsolateral course around the middle of the vertebral body. Near the transverse processes, it divides into a lateral (intercostal or lumbar) and a dorsal branch. e dorsal branch runs lateral to the intervertebral foramen and the articular processes as it continues backward between the transverse processes eventually to reach the spinal muscles. Because the segmental artery is closely applied to the anterolateral surface of the body, its rst spinal derivatives are two or more anterior central branches that directly penetrate the cortical bone of the body and that may be traced radiologically into the spon­giosa (Figs. 2.23 and 2.24). e same region of the segmental
LUA
IS
&
MS
Sacr
AB
FIG. 2.22 (A) Anteroposterior and (B) lateral radiographs of spine of an
8-month fetus injected with nely divided barium sulfate. Traditional regional subdivisions of the spine are indicated on the left, and regional arteries that provide the segmental branches to the individual vertebrae are shown on the right. The upper cervical region is supplied by vertebral and deep cervical arteries (VA & DC), the lower cervical and upper two thoracic segments are supplied by the costocervical trunk (CC), and the remaining thoracic vertebrae receive intercostal vessels (IC). The lumbar arteries (LUA) supply their regional vertebrae, and the sacral segments are provided with branches from lateral sacral (LS) and middle sacral (MS) arteries.
DB
T6
IA
FIG. 2.23 Ventral radiograph of section through T6 of a specimen from a
6-year-old child injected with barium sulfate. The intercostal arteries (IA) give rise to dorsal branches (DB) that provide spinal branches to the vertebral canal and posterior branches to the arch and dorsal musculature. The posterior central branches (PCB) are well shown as they send vessels into the vertebral body. Fine anterior central and anterior laminar and posterior laminar vessels can be seen. Note the neurocentral synchondrosis.
artery also supplies longitudinal arteries to the anterior longi­tudinal ligament (Fig. 2.25).
Aer the segmental artery divides into its dorsal and
lateral branches, the dorsal component passes lateral to the intervertebral foramen, where it gives o the spinal branch that provides the major vascularity to the bone and contents of the vertebral canal. is branch may enter the foramen as a
PLB
PCB
ACB
LA
ALB
Chapter 2 Applied Anatomy of the Spine 37
SECTION
T10
LB
NB
L2
FIG. 2.24 Vertical radiograph of section through lumbar vertebra of a
6-year-old child. The vascularity of the lumbar vertebra may be regarded as the archetypal pattern from which other regions evolved variations. The segmental lumbar artery (LA) gives rise to numerous anterior central branches that penetrate the cortical bone of the body. The spinal branch (SB) sends prominent posterior central branches to the dorsum of the body, whereas the dorsal branch (DB) supplies the anterior (ALB) and posterior (PLB) laminar branches. Neural branches (NB) follow the nerve roots to the cord. In this section, the arteria radicularis magna is seen as a neural branch on the right side. ACB, anterior central branches; LB, lumbar branches; PCB, posterior central branches.
T10
PCB
NB
L2
FIG. 2.25 Lateral view of lumbar vertebra shown in Fig. 2.24. Longitudinal
anastomoses of posterior central branches (PCB) can be appreciated, and the disposition of neural branches (NB) is claried. The lumbar arteries also supply small longitudinal branches to the anterior longitudinal ligament.
DB
SB
single vessel, or it may arise from the dorsal segmental branch as numerous independent rami. In either case, it ultimately divides into a triad of posterior central, prelaminar, and intermediate neural branches. e posterior central branch passes over the dorsolateral surface of the intervertebral disc and divides into a caudal and a cranial branch, which supply the two adjacent vertebral bodies.
PCB
ARM
L2
FIG. 2.26 Anteroposterior arteriogram of lower thoracic and upper lumbar
vertebrae in a 6-year-old child. The interlocking anastomotic pattern formed by the posterior central branches (PCB) and the manner in which four branches converge over the center of the dorsum of the body of each vertebra are well shown. The arteria radicularis magna (ARM), which forms a major contribution to the anterior spinal artery of the cord, can be seen arising at L2.
Coursing in the same plane as the posterior longitudinal ligament, these branches vascularize the ligament and the related dura before entering the large concavity in the central dorsal surface of the vertebral body. e dorsum of each vertebral body is supplied by four arteries derived from two intervertebral levels. As these vessels tend to converge toward the dorsal central concavity, where they are cross-connected with their bilateral counterparts, their connections with other vertebral levels give the appearance of a series of rhomboid anastomotic loops (Fig. 2.26) that illustrate the extent of col­lateral supply to a single vertebra.
e prelaminar branch of the spinal artery follows the inner surface of the vertebral arch, giving ne penetrating
nutrient branches to the laminae and ligamenta ava, while also supplying the regional epidural and dorsal tissue. e neural branches that enter the intervertebral foramen with the above-described vessels supply the pia-arachnoid complex and the spinal cord itself. In the fetus and the adult, the neural or radicular branches are not segmentally uniform in their size or occurrence. Although all spinal nerves receive ne twigs to their ganglia and roots, the major contributions to the cord are found at irregular intervals. Several larger radicular arter­ies may be discerned in the cervical and upper thoracic regions, but the largest, the arteria radicularis magna (artery of Adamkiewicz76), is an asymmetrical contribution from one of the upper lumbar, or lower thoracic, segmental arteries. It travels obliquely upward with a ventral spinal root to join the anterior spinal artery in the region of the conus medullaris. Radicular contributions to the dorsal spinal plexus may usually be distinguished by their more tortuous course (see Figs. 2.25 and 2.26).
I
38 BASIC SCIENCE
Aer the dorsal branch of the segmental artery has pro­vided the vessels to the intervertebral foramen, it passes between the transverse processes, where it gives o a ne spray of articular branches to the joint capsule of the articular processes. Immediately distal to this point, it divides into dorsal and medial branches; the larger, dorsal branch ramies in the greater muscle mass of the erector spinae, whereas the medial branch follows the external contours of the lamina and the spinous process. is postlaminar artery supplies the musculature immediately overlying the lamina and sends ne nutrient branches into the bone. e largest of these branches penetrates the lamina through a nutrient foramen located just dorsomedial to the articular capsule.

Regional Variations in Spinal Vasculature

Only vertebrae that are related to the aorta have access to direct segmental branches. e cervical, upper thoracic, and sacral regions have dierent patterns in their segmental supply that aect to various extents the arrangements of the ner vessels. In an arteriogram of the entire fetal spine (see Fig.
2.22), it can be seen that the greater part of the cervical region
is supplied by the vertebral arteries and the deep cervical arteries. An intermediate area that usually includes the lower two cervical and upper two thoracic vertebrae is supplied by costocervical branches of the subclavian artery that are of variable pattern and oen bilaterally dissimilar. From T2 to L3, the typical segmental arrangement prevails, but in the sacral area lateral sacral branches of the hypogastric artery and middle sacral branches assume the function of supporting the nutritional vasculature to the vertebral elements.
Cervical Region
C1
A
1
10
C2
C3
11
1
6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
3
5
e general patterns of the arterial supply with respect to the typical cervical vertebrae are schematically represented in
Figs. 2.27A and 2.28.77 e vertebral arteries represent a lateral
longitudinal fusion of the original segmental vessels and provide a ventrally coursing anterior central artery and a medially directed posterior central artery to each subaxial vertebral element. e anterior spinal plexus is best developed in the cervical region, where it exhibits a rectangular mesh of vessels in which the transverse members (anterior central arteries) run along the upper ventral edges of their respective intervertebral discs. e conspicuousness of this plexus reects the fact that it also serves the cervical prevertebral muscula­ture. e thyrocervical and costocervical trunks assist in the lower cervical region, and the upper cervical part of the plexus receives contributions from the ascending pharyngeal arteries (Fig. 2.29).
Atlantoaxial Complex
With their complex phyletic and developmental history, the components of the atlantoaxial articulation display the most atypical vascular pattern of all the vertebrae. Although the odontoid process represents the denitive centrum of the rst
11
B
FIG. 2.27 (A) Schema of arterial supply to bodies of the upper cervical
vertebrae and the odontoid process. Numerical designations apply to the same structures in (B). 1, Hypoglossal canal passing meningeal artery. 2, Occipital artery. 3, Apical arcade of odontoid process. 4, Ascending pharyngeal artery giving collateral branch beneath anterior arch of atlas. 5, Posterior ascending artery. 6, Anterior ascending artery. 7, Precentral and postcentral arteries to typical cervical vertebral body. 8, Anterior spinal plexus. 9, Medullary branch of vertebral artery; radicular, prelaminar, and meningeal branches are also found at each level. 10, Collateral to ascending pharyngeal artery passing rostral to anterior arch of atlas. 11, Left vertebral artery.
cervical vertebra, it develops and remains as a projecting process of the axis that is almost completely isolated from the rest of the atlas by synovial joint cavities. Its xed position
relative to the rotation of the atlas and the adjacent sections of the vertebral arteries prevents formation of major vascular­ization by direct branches at its corresponding segmental level.
Chapter 2 Applied Anatomy of the Spine 39
PLB
SB
C4
ACB
FIG. 2.28 Vertical radiograph of section through fourth cervical vertebra of
a 6-year-old child, showing vascularity. The deep cervical artery (DC) provides the posterior laminar branches (PLB). Vertebral arteries show numerous anastomoses with other cervical arteries and send spinal branches (SB) that form posterior central branches (PCB) of the body and anterior lamina branches of the arch. Anterior central branches (ACB) may arise independently from the vertebral arteries (VA).
T1
FIG. 2.29 Arteriogram of cervical and upper thoracic regions of the
6-year-old spine seen in Figs. 2.23 and 2.24. The vertebral artery ( VA) and deep cervical branch (DC) of the costocervical trunk (CC) supply segmental branches to each vertebra. The costocervical artery also typically supplies T1 and T2, but in this case T2 receives a high intercostal (IC) branch on the left side.
DC
PCB
VA
VA
DC
CC
IC
One might assume that the nutrition of the dens would easily be accomplished by interosseous vessels derived from the spongiosa within the supporting body of the axis. It is axiomatic, however, that the vascular patterns of bones were developmentally established to supply the original ossication centers within the nonvascular cartilage matrices, and despite the eventual obliteration of the separating cartilage, the original patterns of vascularity generally prevail throughout life. e transient cartilaginous plate, which represents an incipient
intervertebral disc between the atlas and axis, does not calcify until the latter half of the rst decade and eectively prevents
the development of any signicant vascular communication between the axis centrum and the odontoid process. Occa­sionally, noncalcied remnants of this plate may persist in adults; although there may be a stable union between the two elements, a radiolucent area may suggest a fracture nonunion or a “false” os odontoideum.
In light of the foregoing facts, it was not unexpected that the investigations of Schi and Parke78 revealed that the odontoid process was supplied primarily by pairs of anterior and posterior central branches that coursed upward from the surfaces of the body of the axis and were derived from the vertebral arteries at the level of the foramen of the third cervi­cal nerve. e posterior ascending arteries are the larger members of these two sets of vessels and usually arise inde­pendently from the posteromedial sides of their respective vertebral arteries. e individual artery enters the vertebral canal through the foramen between the second and third vertebrae and trifurcates on the dorsum of the axis body. e typical posterior central perforators course medially passing deep to the posterior longitudinal ligament (called the tecto- rial membrane in the craniocervical region) to penetrate into the spongiosa of the axis. A small descending branch anasto­moses distally with vessels of the next lower segment.
e major part of the posterior ascending artery crosses the dorsal surface of the transverse ligament of the atlas about
1.5 mm lateral to the neck of the odontoid process (see Fig.
2.27). Dorsal to the alar ligament, it sends an anterior anasto-
motic branch over the cranial edge of this ligament to form collateral connections with the anterior ascending artery. e posterior ascending artery continues on a medial course to meet its opposite counterpart and forms the apical arcade that arches over the apex of the odontoid process.
e smaller anterior ascending arteries arise from the anteromedial aspect of the vertebral arteries and pass to the ventral surface of the axis body. Fine medial branches send perforators into the substance of the vertebral body and meet in a median anastomosis typical of the anterior central branches of the lower cervical region. e rostral continuance of the anterior ascending arteries brings them dorsal to the anterior arch of the atlas. Here each artery sends numerous ne perforators into the anterolateral surfaces of the neck of the odontoid process and terminates in a spray of vessels that supply the synovial capsule of the median atlantoaxial joint.
Fine branches from the anterior and posterior ascending arteries also assist in the nutrition of the syndesmotic relations of the atlantoaxial and craniovertebral articulations. e main blood supply to the atlanto-occipital joint is provided by a complex of vessels derived from the vertebral and occipital arteries.
Collateral vessels pass over and under the anterior arch of the atlas to anastomose with the apical arcade and ascending arteries.79 ese are derived from some component of the external carotid system. ese vessels are branches of the ascending pharyngeal artery, which has a nearly ubiquitous distribution in the upper pharyngeal region and sends a branch along the inner aspect of the carotid sheath that, on
SECTION
I
40 BASIC SCIENCE
reaching the base of the skull, becomes recurrent and descends deep to the prevertebral fascia to supply the upper prevertebral cervical muscles and anastomose with the anterior spinal plexus. Numerous small-bore vessels that descend from the rim of the foramen magnum to anastomose with the apical arcade are derivatives of a meningeal branch of the occipital artery that enters the skull through the hypoglossal canal (see
Fig. 2.27). Its descending branches supply the periforaminal
dura, the tectorial membrane and alar and apical ligaments, and the ne anastomoses to the arcade.

Sacroiliolumbar Arterial System

From the second thoracic vertebra to the fourth lumbar ver­tebra, the spine and its regionally related structures are sup­plied by pairs of segmental arteries that are direct branches of the aorta. Because the aorta terminates in a bifurcation ventral to the fourth lumbar vertebral body, the vertebrae and the associated tissues caudad to this point rely on an arterial complex derived mostly from the internal iliac (hypogastric) arteries. is “sacroiliolumbar system” consists of contribu­tions from the fourth lumbar artery, the iliolumbar artery, and the middle and lateral sacral arteries.
With the increasing use of percutaneous approaches to the lower lumbar discs, this infra-aortic system of vessels has assumed some surgical signicance, particularly because, in contrast to the conventional segmental supply to the more superior vertebrae, its major components are longitudinally related to the dorsolateral surfaces of the discs most frequently involved in these procedures.
Fourth Lumbar Arteries
e peculiarities of the sacroiliolumbar system of arteries may best be understood if compared with the pattern of distribu­tion of the typical aortic segmental branches. e ramications of the fourth lumbar arteries were selected for this purpose because they not only exemplify the conventional segmental distribution, but oen are involved in the nutrition of the next lower segments by variable contributions to the iliolumbar vessels. ese vessels oen may be twice the caliber of their more cephalad homologues because of a greater muscular and intersegmental distribution.
As depicted in Figs. 2.30 and 2.31, the distribution of the major ramications is similar to that of the thoracic segmental vessels, with the exception of additional branches that supply the psoas and quadratus lumborum muscles. e lateral muscular branch (equivalent of the thoracic intercostals) may be quite large at the fourth lumbar level, where, in contrast to the other lumbar laterals, it passes anterior, rather than poste­rior, to the quadratus lumborum. It then continues to supply the lower posterolateral abdominal wall as it courses superior to the crest of the ilium. As can be seen in Fig. 2.30, it may be equivalent in size to the iliac branch of the iliolumbar artery. Its position superior to the crest indicates that it is more likely to be encountered by percutaneous instrumentation than the latter vessel.
79
1
18
2
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
FIG. 2.30 Distribution and major variations of sacroiliolumbar system of
arteries that supply the vertebrae and their associated structures inferior to the fourth lumbar vertebra. These patterns of the vessels were derived from radiographs of perinatal specimens and dissections of adults and drawn against a tracing of the lumbosacral region taken from a left anterior oblique radiograph of a man. The aorta lies to the left of center as it approaches the bifurcation ventral to the fourth lumbar vertebra. This schema shows the more frequent arrangement of the sacroiliolumbar system on the right side of the illustration, where the iliolumbar vessel (7) has a single origin from the dorsum of the posterior division of the (removed) internal iliac artery. The left side shows the common variation where the iliac artery and the lumbar artery (14) are derived separately. The middle sacral artery (16) is in its typical position, and the anastomotic contribution from the fourth lumbar artery (4) shows its most frequent form. 1, Aorta. 2, Musculocutaneous branch of third lumbar artery. 3, Muscular branch to posterior abdominal wall. 4, Anastomotic contribution of fourth lumbar artery to sacroiliolumbar system. 5, Lumbar branch of iliolumbar artery. 6, Iliac branch of iliolumbar artery. 7, Iliolumbar artery. 8, Left lateral sacral artery. 9, Posterior division of internal iliac artery. 10, Superior and inferior gluteal arteries. 11, External iliac artery. 12, Anterior (visceral) division of internal iliac artery. 13, Internal iliac artery. 14, Variant origin of lumbar branch of iliolumbar artery from lateral sacral artery. 15, Common iliac artery. 16, Middle sacral artery. 17, Left fourth lumbar segmental artery. 18, Left second lumbar segmental artery.
10
9
3
4
5
6
7
8
e dorsal musculocutaneous branch of the fourth lumbar artery is equivalent in distribution to other thoracolumbar segmental arteries. It usually has a medial branch that supplies the external aspects of the facet joints and neural arch com­ponents and the transversospinal group of muscles and a lateral branch to the transversocostal group of the erector spinae. e vertebromedullary (spinal) branches of the fourth lumbar artery are also similar to those of other segmental arteries (see Fig. 2.24). ey are a group of vessels of variable caliber that may generally be sorted into three divisions: (1) the ventral periosteal and osseous branches that supply the posterior longitudinal ligament, the periosteum, and the
Chapter 2 Applied Anatomy of the Spine 41
ASA
L2
L5
DRA
FIG. 2.31 Anteroposterior radiograph of spine from a perinatal cadaver
injected with barium sulfate. The aorta and common iliac vessels have been removed before radiography. This specimen shows considerable variation between the two sides of the sacroiliolumbar system. On the right, a small lumbar branch and a descending branch from the fourth lumbar artery (4LA) enter the L5-S1 intervertebral foramen. On the left, there is no lumbar branch, and a descending branch of the L4 artery supplies all of the vessels to the L5-S1 foramen. The middle sacral artery is also absent, and other branches of the system supply its domain. The radicular branches of the vertebromedullary vessels supply the distal radicular arteries (DRA) and reveal the positions of the lower ends of the lumbosacral nerve roots. AMM, Arteria medullaris magna; ASA, anterior spinal artery; IIA, internal iliac artery; ILA, iliolumbar artery.
AMM
4LA
ILA
IIA
A major peculiarity of the fourth lumbar artery is its pro­clivity toward providing a relatively large, caudally directed intersegmental branch that arises near the level of the inter­vertebral foramen and becomes reciprocally involved with the lumbar branch of the iliolumbar artery. When this latter vessel is small or absent, the descending branch of the fourth lumbar artery may be suciently large to provide the predominant nutritional system to two vertebral segments caudad to its origin (see Figs. 2.30 and 2.31).
Iliolumbar Artery
As opposed to the mostly visceral distribution of the anterior division of the internal iliac (hypogastric) artery, the posterior division is essentially a somatic artery giving rise to gluteal, iliolumbar, and lateral sacral branches. e iliolumbar artery most frequently is the rst branch of this dorsal division. It is
directed dorsosuperiorly, passing close to the ventrolateral surface of the rst sacral vertebral segment. It courses superi­orly, dorsal to the obturator nerve and ventral to the lumbo­sacral trunk. Lateral to the inferior margin of the L5-S1 disc, the iliolumbar artery usually divides into a laterally directed iliac artery and an ascending lumbar artery. e rst of these crosses the sacroiliac joint to reach the iliac fossa of the pelvis, where it courses inferior to the iliac crest and usually deep to the muscle to provide muscular branches to the iliac muscle and articular twigs to the acetabulum and eventually anasto­moses with the deep circumex branch of the femoral artery.
e lumbar artery ascends posterolateral to the L5-S1 disc, still between the obturator nerve and the lumbosacral trunk, to provide the vertebromedullary vessels to the L5-S1 inter­vertebral foramen (Fig. 2.32; also see Figs. 2.30 and 2.31). In most cases, a branch of this vessel continues rostrally to anastomose with the descending branch of the fourth lumbar artery. e lumbar branch of the iliolumbar artery provides regional branches to the psoas and quadratus lumborum muscles.
SECTION
I
cancellous bone of the vertebral body; (2) the radiculo­medullary division that provides the irregularly located medullary arteries of the cord and the constant distal radicular arteries to all the roots; and (3) the dorsal division that sup­plies ne articular branches to the deep aspects of the facet joints and the periosteum of the deep surfaces of the laminae and their associated ligaments. e rst two divisions usually originate from a common branch of the segmental artery and enter the intervertebral foramen just rostral to their respective vertebral pedicle and ventral to the dorsal root ganglion, whereas the dorsal division arises from the musculocutaneous branch of the segmental artery and enters the foramen dorsal to the nerve components. All the vertebromedullary branches may provide ne branches to the spinal dura.
e aortic segmental arteries course around their respec­tive vertebral body at its narrowest circumference and are positioned almost equidistant between the adjacent discs. ese parts of the arterial distribution are relatively safe from instrumentation properly positioned to enter the discs.
Sacral Arteries
Lateral Sacral Arteries
Lateral sacral arteries usually form the second branch of the dorsal division of the internal iliac arteries and course down the pars lateralis on each side of the sacrum. Opposite the sacral foramina, they give o medial branches that dorsally enter the foramina. Aer providing the typical vertebromed­ullary derivatives, their dorsal muscular branches exit through the dorsal sacral foramina to supply the sacral origins of the erector spinae muscles.
Middle Sacral Artery
e middle sacral artery is an unpaired vessel that is the last branch of the aorta, usually derived from its dorsal median surface just above the carina of the bifurcation (Fig. 2.33; also see Fig. 2.30). It descends down the ventral surface of the anterior longitudinal ligament over the fourth and h lumbar
42 BASIC SCIENCE
MSAISA HA
L5
MSA
HA
S1
LS
PA
FIG. 2.32 Anteroposterior arteriogram of sacral region in a 7-year-old child.
The lateral sacral arteries (LS) can be seen coming from the hypogastric vessels (HA). The middle sacral artery (MSA) is atypical in this specimen because it stops at S1. Just anterior to the coccyx, the coccygeal bodies (CB) are indicated as small knots of arteriovenous anastomoses. Pudendal arteries (PA) are well injected.
SG
CB
bodies and down the ventral sacrum to terminate at the sacrococcygeal junction in a vascular glomus (sacrococcygeal body) in tail-less mammals or continues ventral to the coc­cygeal (caudal) vertebrae in tailed mammals as the caudal artery. In humans, this is a variable vessel, being totally absent in some cases or replaced by a branch of one of the lateral sacral arteries. Where it is a signicant component of the
sacroiliolumbar system, its rst lateral branches on the ventral surface of the h lumbar body may entirely replace this seg­ment’s contributions from the iliolumbar or fourth lumbar vessels and provide its osseous, muscular, and vertebromedul­lary requirements.
Where it is conspicuously present in the sacral region, the middle sacral artery may also contribute a vertebromedullary branch to each anterior sacral foramen. When it is absent, these ventral sacral territories are provided with segmental medial branches from the lateral sacral arteries.
Functional Signicance
e sacroiliolumbar system, despite its complexity and seem­ingly endless combinations of reciprocal substitutions, supplies the lower lumbosacral elements of the spine and the inferior half of the lumbosacral spinal nerve roots (cauda equina) and the back musculature inferior to the L4 level. It is also a major contributor to the vasa nervorum of the lumbosacral plexus. e distal radicular arteries dene the positions of the lum­bosacral roots (see Fig. 2.25). Although signicant medullary branches to the spinal cord are seldom found below L4, they do occur, and from the preceding descriptions it is obvious why the ligation of both internal iliac arteries during radical cystoprostatectomy can result in spinal cord ischemia.
80
S2
S3
FIG. 2.33 Radiograph of horizontal section through sacroiliac joint. The
natural curvature of the sacrum provided oblique sections through segments 2, 3, and 4. The hypogastric artery (HA) gives o the lateral sacral artery (LSA) that sends anastomotic branches to join the middle sacral artery (MSA); from these, the sacral segments receive the penetrating anterior central branches. The dorsal branches pass into the anterior sacral foramina to provide posterior, central, neural, and prelaminar branches. The dorsal branches leave through the posterior sacral foramina to supply the muscles and posterior laminar branches.
S4

Venous System of the Vertebral Column

An external plexus and an internal plexus of veins are associ­ated with the vertebral column. e distribution of the two systems roughly coincides with the areas served by the external and internal arterial supplies. e external venous plexus also consists of an anterior and a posterior set of veins. e small anterior external plexus is coextensive with the anterior central arteries and receives tributaries that perforate the anterior and lateral sides of the vertebral body.
e more extensive posterior external veins drain the regions supplied by posterior (muscular and postlaminar) branches of the segmental artery. e posterior external veins form an essentially paired system, which lies in the two verte­brocostal grooves, but has cross anastomoses between the spinous processes. It is a valveless venous complex that receives the draining segmental tributaries of the internal veins through the intervertebral foramina and communicates ultimately with the lumbar and intercostal tributaries of the caval and azygos system. e posterior external plexus becomes most extensive in the posterior nuchal region, where it receives the intraspinous tributaries via the vertebral veins and drains into the deep cervical and jugular veins.