Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_6012_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Contributors
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgment
- •From Neural Tube to Spinal Cord
- •Development of the Costal Elements
- •Development of the Intervertebral Disc
- •Spinal Ligament Development
- •Development of Specialized Vertebral Regions
- •Occipitocervical Complex
- •Atlantoaxial Complex
- •Sacrum
- •Genetic Control of Spinal Segmentation
- •1 Development of the Spine
- •Early Embryologic Spine Precursors: Day 17 to Week 4
- •From Somites to Spinal Column
- •Precartilaginous (Mesenchymal) Stage: Weeks 4 and 5
- •Cartilaginous Stage: Weeks 6 and 7
- •Fate of the Notochord
- •Links Between Fly and Human
- •Congenital Syndromes: Genetic Evidence of Segmentation in Humans
- •Klippel-Feil Syndrome
- •Caudal Dysplasias
- •Acknowledgment
- •Key References
- •References
- •2 Applied Anatomy of the Spine
- •Vertebrae
- •Pars Interarticularis
- •Regional Characteristics
- •Cervical Vertebrae
- •Atlantoaxial Complex
- •Thoracic Vertebrae
- •Lumbar Vertebrae
- •Sacral Vertebrae
- •Coccyx
- •Arthrology of the Spine
- •Articulations of the Vertebral Arches
- •Special Articulations
- •Articulations of the Vertebral Bodies
- •Intervertebral Disc
- •Nucleus Pulposus
- •Anulus Fibrosus
- •Regional Variations of the Disc
- •Spinal Ligaments
- •Anterior Longitudinal Ligament
- •Posterior Longitudinal Ligament
- •Relationships of the Roots of the Spinal Nerves
- •Intervertebral Foramen
- •Lumbosacral Nerve Root Variations
- •Innervation of the Spine
- •Spinal Motion Segment
- •Nutrition of the Intervertebral Disc
- •Blood Supply of the Vertebral Column
- •Regional Variations in Spinal Vasculature
- •Cervical Region
- •Atlantoaxial Complex
- •Sacroiliolumbar Arterial System
- •Fourth Lumbar Arteries
- •Iliolumbar Artery
- •Sacral Arteries
- •Lateral Sacral Arteries
- •Middle Sacral Artery
- •Venous System of the Vertebral Column
- •Blood Supply of the Spinal Cord
- •Anterior Spinal Artery
- •Lateral Spinal Arteries of the Cervical Cord
- •Intrinsic Vascularity of the Spinal Cord
- •Intrinsic Venous Drainage of the Spinal Cord
- •Vascularization of the Spinal Nerve Roots
- •Functional Anatomy of the Spine
- •Biomechanics of the Intervertebral Disc
- •Acknowledgments
- •Key References
- •References
- •Cross-Bridge Cycle
- •Muscle Fiber Types
- •Fiber Type Distribution of Paraspinal Muscles
- •Muscle Injury
- •Muscle Architecture
- •Experimental Determination of Skeletal Muscle Architecture
- •Interplay of Muscle Architecture and Moment Arm
- •Summary
- •Key References
- •References
- •Anatomy and Architecture of Spinal Musculature
- •Intrinsic Spinal Muscles in the Lumbar, Thoracic, or Cervical Spine
- •Splenius Capitis and Cervicis
- •Semispinalis Capitis and Cervicis
- •Longus Capitis and Colli
- •Suboccipital Muscles
- •Extrinsic Muscles Linking Vertebrae or Skull to the Shoulder Girdle or Rib Cage
- •Implications of Spinal Muscle Anatomy and Architecture for Motor Control
- •Fascicle Length Changes With Posture
- •Moment Arm Changes With Posture
- •References
- •Normal Disc
- •Disc Anatomy
- •Cartilaginous Endplates
- •Nucleus Pulposus
- •Anulus Fibrosus
- •Blood Supply, Nutrition, and Innervation
- •Blood Supply
- •Nutrition
- •Innervation
- •Disc Composition
- •Water
- •Macromolecules
- •Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
- •Degeneration
- •Implications of Spinal Muscle Anatomy and Architecture for Injury and Pain
- •Muscle Injury Resulting From Eccentric Contraction
- •Muscles Altering Load Distribution in Other Anatomic Structures
- •Summary
- •Key References
- •Matrix Macromolecule Changes
- •Cellular Changes
- •Structural Changes
- •Neovascularization and Sensory Nerve Innervation
- •Etiology of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
- •Aging
- •Genetic Predisposition
- •Nutrition
- •Environmental Factors
- •Facet Joints, Ligaments, and Vertebral Bodies
- •Facet Joints
- •Ligaments
- •Vertebral Bodies
- •References
- •6 Biomechanics of the Spinal Motion Segment
- •Assessing the Biomechanics of the Spinal Motion Segment
- •Physical Charcteristics of the Spine Structures
- •Support Structures
- •Disc
- •Spinal Ligaments
- •Tissue Load Characteristics
- •Mechanical Degeneration: Tissues at Risk
- •In Vitro Spine Biomechanics
- •Motion Characteristics (Kinematics) of the Spinal Motion Segments
- •Axis of Rotation
- •Motion Coupling
- •Neutral Zone Limits
- •Load Tolerance of the Spinal Motion Segments
- •Muscle and Tendon Strain
- •Ligament and Bone Tolerance
- •Contact Force Tolerance
- •Compression
- •Shear
- •Torsion
- •Flexion and Extension
- •Lateral Motion
- •In Vivo Spine Biomechanics
- •Overview
- •Quantitative Assessment of in Vivo Spinal Motion
- •Overall Spine Kinematics (Extrinsic Measurements)
- •Spine Kinematics (Intrinsic Measurements)
- •Quantitative Assessment of in Vivo Spinal Loading
- •In Silico Modeling in the Spine
- •The System
- •Summary
- •Key References
- •References
- •Chronic Experimental Nerve Root Compression
- •Spinal Stenosis: Experimental-Clinical Correlation
- •Mechanical Nerve Root Deformation and Pain
- •Neuropathologic Changes and Pain
- •Nucleus Pulposus and Sciatic Pain
- •Other Consequences of Herniated Nucleus Pulposus
- •Chemical Components of Nucleus Pulposus
- •Cytokines as Mediators of Nerve Dysfunction and Pain
- •Clinical Use of Cytokine Inhibitors for Treatment of Sciatica
- •Summary
- •Key References
- •References
- •Introduction to Genetics
- •Chromosomes and DNA
- •Genetic Variations
- •Mutations and Polymorphisms
- •Terminology and Types of Disease
- •Gene Mapping
- •Linkage Analysis
- •Association Studies
- •Newer Technologies
- •Interpretation of Results
- •Disc Degeneration Genetics
- •Scoliosis Genetics
- •Early-Onset Scoliosis and Congenital Scoliosis
- •Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
- •Conclusions and the Future
- •Key References
- •References
- •9 Twin Studies
- •Critical Importance of Phenotype
- •Disc Degeneration
- •Modic Changes
- •Schmorl’s Nodes and Endplate Defects
- •Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
- •Exposure-Discordant Twin Studies of Disc Degeneration
- •Cohort and Matched Case-Control Studies of Back Pain
- •Summary
- •Key References
- •References
- •10 Outcomes Research for Spinal Disorders
- •Need for Outcomes Research
- •Measuring Outcomes in Spinal Disorders
- •Importance of Study Design in Outcomes Research
- •Understanding Threats to Study Validity
- •Chance
- •Bias
- •Confounding
- •Randomized Controlled Trials
- •Observational Cohort Studies
- •Case-Control Studies
- •Case Series
- •Levels of Evidence
- •Key Points
- •Key References
- •References
- •11 Finite Element Analysis
- •Introduction
- •Finite Element Modeling of the Spine
- •Low Back Pain
- •Modeling of the Lumbar Spine
- •Vertebral Body and Posterior Bone
- •Intervertebral Disc
- •Apophyseal (Facet) Joint
- •Ligaments
- •Validation of the Lumbar Model
- •Finite Element Model of the Cervical Spine
- •Conversion of CT and MRI Scans to 3D Solid Model
- •Meshing
- •Finite Element Analysis (Using Abaqus Version 6.11)
- •Vertebral Body and Posterior Bone
- •Facet Joints
- •Intervertebral Disc and Luschka’s Joints
- •Ligaments
- •Application of the Finite Element Model of the Spine
- •Clinical Application of the Finite Element Models of the Spine
- •Conclusion
- •Key References
- •References
- •Biomedical Factors and the Medical History
- •Red Flags: What Not to Miss
- •Historical Features of the Presenting Complaint
- •Axial Versus Radicular Pain
- •Patient Demographics
- •Past Medical History
- •Family History
- •Yellow Flags: Predictors of Poor Outcome in the Patient’s History
- •Obtaining a Psychosocial History
- •Additional Assessment Tools
- •Physical Examination
- •Observation
- •Palpation
- •Neurologic Examination
- •Special Tests and Provocative Maneuvers
- •Nonorganic Signs
- •Additional Orthopaedic Assessment
- •Summary
- •Key Points
- •Key References
- •References
- •13 Spine Imaging
- •Modalities
- •Radiographs
- •Myelography
- •Computed Tomography
- •Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •Routine Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •Magnetic Resonance Myelography
- •Magnetic Resonance Neurography
- •Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow Imaging
- •Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
- •Magnetic Resonance Imaging Safety and Patient Issues
- •Spinal Angiography
- •Discography
- •Nuclear Medicine Examinations
- •Imaging Artifacts
- •Pathology
- •Degenerative Disc Disease
- •Intervertebral Disc
- •Degenerative Endplate Changes
- •Lumbar Stenosis
- •Facet Disease
- •Instability
- •Cervical Radiculopathy and Myelopathy
- •Postoperative Imaging
- •Epidural Fibrosis and Disc Herniations
- •Stenosis
- •Arachnoiditis
- •Infection
- •Intramedullary Lesions
- •Neoplasms
- •Intradural Extramedullary Lesions
- •Extradural Lesions
- •Bone Marrow Imaging
- •Spinal Cysts
- •Trauma
- •Hemorrhage
- •Key Points
- •Key References
- •References
- •14 Electrodiagnostic Examination
- •Pathophysiology
- •General Concepts of Electrodiagnostic Examination
- •Nerve Conduction Studies
- •Motor Nerve Conduction Studies
- •Sensory Nerve Conduction Studies
- •Late Responses (H Responses and F Waves)
- •Needle Electrode Examination
- •Insertional Phase
- •At-Rest Phase
- •Activation Phase
- •Recruitment
- •Morphology
- •Electrodiagnostic Findings in Radiculopathy
- •Nerve Conduction Studies
- •Routine Studies
- •Late Responses
- •Needle Electrode Examination
- •Determining Duration of Radiculopathy: Acute Versus Chronic
- •Determining Severity of Radiculopathy
- •Cervical Radiculopathy
- •Thoracic Radiculopathy
- •Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
- •Electrodiagnostic Findings of Other Spine-Related Disorders
- •Cauda Equina Syndrome
- •Lumbar Canal Stenosis
- •Myelopathy
- •Postlaminectomy Electrodiagnostic Findings
- •Cervical Root Avulsion
- •Acknowledgments
- •Key Points
- •Key References
- •References
- •Intraoperative Monitoring of the Spinal Cord
- •Somatosensory-Evoked Potential Monitoring
- •Generators of the Somatosensory-Evoked Potential Responses
- •Motor-Evoked Potential Monitoring
- •Clinical Use of Intraoperative Monitoring
- •Pedicle Screw Stimulation
- •Summary
- •Pearls
- •Pitfalls
- •Key Points
- •Key References
- •References
- •16 Targeting Pain Generators
- •Diagnostic Analgesic Injections as Reference Standard
- •Testing Protocols for Diagnostic Injections
- •Confounding Factors
- •Sedation
- •Biopsychosocial Factors
- •Posterior Compartment: Zygapophyseal Joint and Sacroiliac Joint
- •Zygapophyseal Joint
- •Pathophysiology of Zygapophyseal Joint Pain
- •Rationale for Control Blocks in Diagnostic Zygapophyseal Joint Intraarticular and Medial Branch Blocks
- •Diagnostic Accuracy
- •Lumbar Spine: Zygapophyseal Joint Syndrome
- •History
- •Lumbar Zygapophyseal Joint Pain
- •Zygapophyseal Joint Pain Referral Maps
- •Predictive Value
- •Cervical Spine Zygapophyseal Joint Syndrome
- •History
- •Cervical Zygapophyseal Joint Pain
- •Thoracic Spine
- •Summary
- •Sacroiliac Joint
- •Pathophysiology
- •Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical History and Physical Examination for Sacroiliac Pain
- •Diagnostic Accuracy of Imaging
- •Diagnostic Accuracy of Sacroiliac Joint Injections
- •Predictive Value
- •Summary
- •Middle Compartment: Selective Nerve Root Blocks
- •Radicular Pain and the Role of Selective Nerve Root Blocks
- •History
- •Diagnostic Accuracy of Selective Nerve Root Blocks
- •Sensitivity
- •Predictive Value
- •Technical Considerations and Potential Pitfalls
- •Confounding Factors
- •Summary
- •Pearls and Pitfalls
- •Key Points
- •Key References
- •References
- •17 Discography
- •Clinical Context
- •Discography Technique
- •Criteria for Positive Test
- •Diagnostic Injections and Modulation of Pain Perception in Axial Pain Syndromes
- •Adjacent Tissue Injury
- •Local Anesthetic
- •Tissue Injury and Nociception in Adjacent or Same Sclerotome
- •Chronic Pain Syndromes
- •Narcotic Analgesia and Habituation
- •Depression, Anxiety, and Somatic Distress
- •Social Imperatives
- •Social Disincentive
- •Summary
- •Evidence for Validity and Usefulness of Provocative Discography
- •Validity of Discography
- •Discographic Injections in Previously Operated Discs
- •Validity of Concordance Report
- •Discography in Subjects With Minimal Low Back Symptoms
- •Pressure-Sensitive Injections and Discography Validity
- •Evidence That Discography in Clinical Practice May Improve Outcomes
- •Clinical Outcome as a Gold Standard in Provocative Discography
- •Complications
- •Conclusions Regarding Provocative Discography
- •Pearls
- •Pitfalls
- •Key Points
- •Key References
- •References
- •Surgical Anatomy
- •Surface Anatomy and Skin
- •Osseous Anatomy and Bony Articulation
- •Ligaments
- •Intervertebral Discs
- •Neural Elements
- •Vascular Structures
- •Musculature
- •Fascial Layers
- •Triangles of the Neck
- •Surgical Approaches
- •Anterior Approaches to Upper Cervical Spine
- •Transoral Technique
- •Complications
- •Anteromedial Retropharyngeal Technique
- •Anterolateral Retropharyngeal Technique
- •Complications
- •Anterior Exposure of Lower Cervical Spine
- •Anteromedial Approach
- •Anterolateral Approach
- •Complications
- •Anterior Approach to Cervicothoracic Junction
- •Sternal-Splitting Approach
- •Transthoracic Approach
- •Complications
- •Posterior Approaches
- •Posterior Approach to Upper Cervical Spine
- •Posterior Approach to Lower Cervical Spine
- •Posterior Approach to Cervicothoracic Junction
- •Complications
- •Pearls
- •Pitfalls
- •Key Points
- •Key References
- •References
- •Surgical Approaches to the Anterior Thoracic Spine
- •Low Anterior Cervical and High Transsternal Approach
- •Transpleural Transthoracic Third Rib Resection
- •Thoracotomy (Anterior) Approach to the Thoracic Spine
- •Endoscopic Anterior Approach to the Thoracic Spine
- •Anterior Anatomy of the Thoracolumbar Junction
- •Anterior Approach to the Thoracolumbar Spine
- •Posterior Anatomy of the Thoracic Spine
- •Posterior Approaches to the Thoracic Spine
- •Posterior Approach for Decompressive Laminectomy and Fusion
- •Transpedicular Approach
- •Costotransversectomy
- •Lateral Extracavitary Approach
- •Minimally Invasive Approaches to the Thoracic and Thoracolumbar Spine
- •Key Points
- •Low Anterior Cervical and High Transsternal Approach
- •Transpleural Transthoracic Third Rib Approach
- •Thoracotomy (Anterior) Approach to the Thoracic Spine
- •Endoscopic Anterior Approach to the Thoracic Spine
- •Anterior Approach to the Thoracolumbar Spine
- •Posterior Approach for Decompressive Laminectomy and Fusion
- •Transpedicular Approach
- •Costotransversectomy
- •Lateral Extracavitary Approach
- •Minimally Invasive Approaches
- •Key References
- •References
- •Selection of Approach to the Lumbar Spine
- •Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach to the Spine
- •Technique
- •Complications
- •Posterior Approach to the Lumbar Spine
- •Technique
- •Posterolateral Approach to the Lumbar Vertebral Bodies
- •Technique
- •Pearls
- •Pitfalls
- •Key Points
- •Key References
- •References
- •21 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
- •History
- •Indications
- •Advantages
- •Contraindications
- •Technique
- •Anatomic Considerations
- •Lumbar Plexus
- •Vascular Anatomy
- •High Iliac Crest/Lumbosacral Junction
- •Scoliosis
- •Thoracolumbar Junction
- •Thoracic Spine
- •Complications
- •Outcomes
- •Summary
- •Key References
- •References
- •Anatomic Considerations in Spinal Pain
- •Zygapophyseal Joint (Facet Joint)
- •Sacroiliac Joint
- •Intervertebral Disc
- •Ligaments of the Spine
- •Nerve Root
- •Cervical Spine Injections
- •Procedure: Cervical Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection
- •Procedure: Cervical Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection
- •Procedure: Cervical Medial Branch Blocks and Radiofrequency Ablation
- •Lumbar Spine Injections
- •Procedure: Lumbar Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection
- •Procedure: Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection
- •Procedure: Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection
- •Procedure: Lumbar Zygapophyseal Joint Injections (Facet Joint)
- •Procedure: Lumbar Medial Branch Blocks and Radiofrequency Ablation
- •Procedure: Sacroiliac Joint Injection
- •Summary
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Background
- •Anatomy
- •Pathology
- •Diagnosis
- •Clinical History
- •Physical Examination
- •Role of Imaging
- •Diagnostic Injection
- •Summary
- •References
- •Nonsurgical Treatment
- •Medication Management
- •Physical Therapy
- •Pelvic Bracing
- •Sacroiliac Joint Injection
- •Radiofrequency Ablation
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Open Surgery
- •Minimally Invasive Surgery
- •Outcomes From Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
- •Complications From Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
- •Minimally Invasive Surgical Fusion Technique
- •Summary
- •References
- •25 Back Pain in Children and Adolescents
- •Introduction
- •History
- •Physical Examination
- •Diagnostic Studies
- •Radiographs
- •Bone Scan
- •Computed Tomography
- •Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •Laboratory Tests
- •Muscle Strain
- •Disc Herniation
- •Apophyseal Ring Fracture/Slipped Vertebral Apophysis
- •Vertebral Fractures
- •Developmental Disorders
- •Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis
- •Scheuermann Kyphosis
- •Lumbar Scheuermann Disease
- •Idiopathic Scoliosis
- •Syringomyelia
- •Tethered Spinal Cord
- •Idiopathic Juvenile Osteoporosis
- •Discitis
- •Vertebral Osteomyelitis
- •Ankylosing Spondylitis and Rheumatologic Conditions
- •Hematologic Conditions
- •Sickle Cell Anemia
- •Neoplasms
- •Aneurysmal Bone Cysts
- •Osteoid Osteoma
- •Osteoblastoma
- •Eosinophilic Granuloma/Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis
- •Malignant Tumors
- •Leukemia
- •Vertebral Malignant Tumors
- •Spinal Metastasis
- •Spinal Cord Tumors
- •Nonorthopaedic Causes of Pain
- •Psychosomatic Pain (Conversion Reaction)
- •Key Points
- •Use of Diagnostic Tests
- •Likely Diagnoses Based on Age
- •References
- •26 Congenital Scoliosis
- •Embryology
- •Normal Development
- •Associated Anomalies
- •Genetic Etiology
- •Environmental Etiology
- •Failures of Formation
- •Failures of Segmentation
- •Mixed Deformity
- •Natural History
- •Location
- •Progression of Curvature by Deformity Type and Location
- •Assessment of Patient
- •Physical Examination
- •Associated Anomalies
- •Imaging
- •Radiographs
- •Computed Tomography
- •Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •Treatment
- •Nonoperative
- •Operative
- •Posterior Spine Fusion
- •Combined Anterior and Posterior Spine Fusion
- •Convex Hemiepiphysiodesis
- •Hemivertebra Excision
- •Osteotomies
- •Vertebral Column Resection
- •Guided Growth Procedures
- •Conclusion
- •Key Points
- •Key References
- •References
- •27 Idiopathic Scoliosis
- •Epidemiology
- •Etiology
- •Genetics
- •Natural History
- •Evaluation
- •History and Physical Examination
- •Radiographic Evaluation
- •Treatment Options
- •Observation
- •Bracing and Casting
- •Operative Intervention
- •Surgical Techniques
- •Upper and Lower Instrumented Vertebra Selection
- •Selective Fusions
- •Adjuncts to Correction
- •Direct Vertebral Rotation
- •Osteotomies
- •Minimally Invasive Techniques
- •Postoperative Care
- •Complications
- •Summary
- •Pearls and Pitfalls
- •Key Points
- •Key References
- •References
- •28 Neuromuscular Scoliosis
- •General Principles
- •Natural History and Associated Complications
- •Treatment Principles
- •Nonoperative Treatment
- •Medical Treatment
- •Spinal Muscular Atrophy
- •Cerebral Palsy
- •Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
- •Genetic and Family Counseling
- •Bracing

Chapter 7 Nerve Root Pain in Disc Herniation and Spinal Stenosis 123
patients with obvious symptoms of disc herniation but with
no visible herniation at radiologic examination or surgery.
54,55
e potential of nucleus pulposus material to induce pain has
also been indicated in clinical studies that showed that noncontained herniations (the nucleus pulposus was in contact
with the epidural space) were much more painful and had a
more pronounced straight-leg raising test result than contained herniations.
56-58
Studies on rats using pain behavior assessment indicated
that the nucleus pulposus is involved in pain production.
Pain behavior in this context refers to response thresholds
to thermal and mechanical stimulation. e role of the
various anatomic components of the nerve root complex for
the production of spinal pain was further elucidated by
Cavanaugh and colleagues31 and Weinstein and colleagues.32
Other studies33 suggest a dose-response relationship between
pain behavior and the amount of nucleus pulposus material
in the epidural space. e combination of nucleus pulposus
herniation and mechanical injury produces pain.33 is observation is consistent with the neuropathologic understanding
of pain and the consequences of combined mechanical and
inammatory injury to nerve bers that are superimposed to
increase the number of bers injured and the corresponding
increase in proinammatory cytokines.
40,41
ese experimental studies on pain behavior suggest that
the presence of nucleus pulposus has sensitized the nerve
tissue. Minor compression of peripheral nerves is not painful,
and touching of a normal nerve root during local anesthesia is
not painful.59 Touching of a nerve root exposed to a disc herniation oen reproduces the sciatic pain, however.59 Although
the combination of a mechanical component and the presence
of nucleus pulposus seems to be a prerequisite to produce
changes in the in vivo situation, more recent neurophysiologic
studies have shown that the mere application of nucleus
pulposus may induce increased neuronal pain transmission.
60
e spinal dura mater is known to contain nerve endings,
and stimulation of the dura has been suggested as a mechanism for sciatic pain.
42,59,61,62
Irritation or stimulation of the
dura as one important factor for sciatica is an interesting
theory that could explain many clinical features. One may
assume that the dura is segmentally innervated, the sensory
nerves travel in a caudal-lateral direction, and the dura is
drained to the corresponding nerve root by the nerve of
Luschka.63 Stimulation of the dura at a point where dorsolateral disc herniations appear (1 in Fig. 7.3) might be recorded
by the corresponding nerve root. At this location, the irritation
may spread medially to the contralateral segment, producing
bilateral symptoms, or laterally, producing symptoms from
levels above. Similarly, a lateral disc herniation (2 in Fig. 7.3)
could produce symptoms in the lower level.
If the pain of the straight-leg raising test is the result of dura
irritation owing to friction to the herniated mass, one may
consider the phenomenon of crossed straight-leg raising to be
based on simultaneous stimulation of the contralateral dura.
Such a “radiculitis” or “local meningitis” probably could be
regarded as similar to peritonitis. When there is peritonitis,
there is usually a reectory muscle contraction present over
the aected area. An analogue for this local meningitis could
2
FIG. 7.3 Suggested area of innervation by one recurrent sinuvertebral
nerve (nerve of Luschka). Disc herniation at location 1 may be recorded by
the same nerve and by the nearby innervation areas, laterally and
contralaterally, as indicated by arrows. At location 2, lateral disc herniation of
disc one level below may aect same nerve root but also root one level
below, located medial to this root, as indicated by arrows. A, Thecal sac; B,
dorsal root ganglion; C, intervertebral disc. (From Olmarker K. The
experimental basis of sciatica. J Orthop Sci. 1996;1:230-242.)
A
B
C
be the reectory ipsilateral contraction of the spinal muscles,
producing the “sciatic scoliosis” or lateral bending of the spine
at the level of herniation.
Other Consequences of Herniated Nucleus Pulposus
Histologic observations have indicated that nerve root changes
caused by nucleus pulposus are focal and mainly found in the
center of the nerve roots, resembling a mononeuritis simplex
that is induced by nerve infarction secondary to embolism of
the intraneural vessels.
Jayson and colleagues
venous outow from the nerve roots owing to periradicular
vascular changes, one must consider vascular impairment as
one factor.
e inammatory components of nucleus pulposus may be
involved in vascular and rheologic phenomena, such as coagulation, and may be involved in nerve root vascular embolism.
It has been observed that the presence of nucleus pulposus
may induce thrombus formation in microvessels.49 Inammatory mediators may also exert a direct eect on the myelin
sheaths, as indicated by an electron microscopic study of nerve
roots exposed to autologous nucleus pulposus in the pig.44
ere were signicant injuries of Schwann cells with vacuolization and disintegration of Schmidt-Lanterman incisures,
which closely resembles the injury pattern of inammatory
43,44
Particularly in view of the work of
64,65
indicating an impairment of the
SECTION
I

124 BASIC SCIENCE
nerve disease.
66,67
As previously described, epidural application of nucleus pulposus induces an increase of the vascular
permeability and a subsequent reduction of the blood ow in
the adjacent nerve roots, which suggests vascular impairment
as being of pathophysiologic importance.
It has also been suggested that because the nucleus pulposus
is avascular and “hidden” from the systemic circulation, a
presentation of the nucleus pulposus could result in an autoimmune reaction directed to antigens present in the nucleus
pulposus and that bioactive substances from this reaction may
injure the nerve tissue.
68-75
e work of Li and colleagues76
has demonstrated that there are autoimmune reactions not
only to the disc but also to components from the nerve tissue
that are released as the result of injury, such as basic myelin
proteins. Another study also assessed the presence of immune
complexes in herniated disc tissue obtained at surgery as an
indicator of immunoactivation.77 Immunoglobulin G (IgG)
was found in close relation to the disc cells in herniated disc
material. No IgG was found, however, in the residual disc that
was evacuated at the time of surgery. No immune complexes
were found in control disc material obtained at spine surgery
for other causes than pain.
Chemical Components of Nucleus Pulposus
e nucleus pulposus is composed mainly of proteoglycans,
collagen, and cells.
gained the most attention and has been suggested to have a
direct irritating eect on nerve tissue.
gen nor the cells have previously been suggested to be of
pathophysiologic importance. More recent studies of the cells
of the nucleus pulposus have shown, however, that these cells
are capable of producing metalloproteinases such as collagenase or gelatinase and interleukin (IL)-6 and prostaglandin E2
and do so spontaneously in culture.
Substances such as IgG, hydrogen ions, nitric oxide, and
phospholipase A2 have also been suggested to be responsible
for the pathophysiologic reactions.
produced by the disc cells that has similar pathophysiologic
eects as nucleus pulposus is tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α.
78,79
e proteoglycan component has
74,80,81
Neither the colla-
74,82-86
Another substance
87
Cytokines as Mediators of Nerve Dysfunction and Pain
TNF is known to be a regulatory proinammatory cytokine
that has specic biologic eects and the ability to upregulate
and act synergistically with other cytokines such as IL-1β
and IL-6.
and upregulated by Schwann cells at the site of nerve injury91;
this is followed by release and upregulation of TNF in many
other endoneurial cells, including endothelial cells, broblasts,
and mast cells. is local production of TNF is the stimulus
that results in macrophage attraction to the injury site,39
which contributes massively to the concentration of proin-
ammatory cytokines in the injured tissue. Several studies
have shown that blocking TNF production or delaying the
invasion of macrophages to the site of nerve injury results
88-90
Immediately aer nerve injury, TNF is released
in reduced or delayed neuropathologic change and reduced
hyperalgesia.
52,92
TNF is known to induce axonal and myelin injury similar
96,98,103,104
93-99
intra-
and to
to that observed aer nucleus pulposus application,
vascular coagulation,
102
it y.
TNF is also known to be neurotoxic
induce painful behavioral changes
activity when applied locally.
100-102
and increased vascular permeabil-
93,105
94,104
and ectopic nerve
TNF is sequestered in a
membrane-bound form and is activated aer shedding by
certain enzymes. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are
particularly important in this regard. MMP-9 and MMP-2 are
upregulated immediately aer a nerve injury.
106
MMPs process
the inactive, membrane-bound form of TNF and its receptors
to the biologically active form and are directly associated with
breakdown of the blood-brain and blood-nerve barriers.
MMP-9 and TNF receptors are also retrogradely transported
from the site of nerve injury to the corresponding dorsal root
ganglion and spinal cord,
107
where they may have a direct role
in gene regulation. is may relate to the observation that cell
membranes of disc cells are sucient to mediate the nucleus
pulposus–induced eects.
TNF induces activation of endothelial adhesion molecules
such as intercellular and vascular cell adhesion molecules,
adhering circulating immune cells to the vessel walls (Fig.
88,108,109
7.4).
As a consequence of the TNF-induced increased
vascular permeability, these cells migrate into the endoneurial
space where the axons are located. e cells release their content
of TNF and other cytokines, which may induce accumulation
of ion channels locally in the axonal membranes.
110-112
e
channels may allow for an increased passage of sodium and
potassium, which may result in spontaneous discharges and
in discharges of ectopic impulses aer mechanical stimula-
tion. TNF by itself can cause spontaneous electrical activity in
A-delta and C nociceptors.
104
Such discharges, whether they
come from a pain ber or a nerve ber transmitting other
sensory information, are interpreted as pain by the brain.
Previous studies have also indicated that local application of
nucleus pulposus may disintegrate the myelin sheath
also a known eect of TNF.
113
is injury could also contribute
42,43
; this is
to the formation of ectopic impulses and to the sensitization
to mechanical stimulus. Experimental and clinical studies
have shown that nerve root compression and disc herniation
can induce increased concentrations of neurolament in the
cerebrospinal uid.
114,115
Increased levels of serum antibodies
against one or more nervous system–associated glycosphingolipids have been shown in patients with sciatica and disc
herniation, indicating a possible autoimmune response.
116
More recent work regarding molecular events in the pathophysiology of neuropathic pain has suggested a potential role
of TNF for inducing allodynia.
94,117,118
TNF may mediate the
formation of allodynia in the dorsal root ganglion and at the
spinal cord level because of its local upregulation, which
occurs via a positive feedback loop caused by TNF itself. is
cycle seems to be broken by a direct eect of TNF on the
upregulation of antiinammatory cytokines such as IL-10,
which eventually leads to a reduction of TNF and the physiologic balance of proinammatory and antiinammatory
cytokines. Such regulation seems to be induced by mechanical

TNF
C
Pain and nerve dysfunction
Aggregation of
Endoneurial capillary
Chapter 7 Nerve Root Pain in Disc Herniation and Spinal Stenosis 125
3)
1) Adhesion of
circulating WBCs
thrombocytes
and formation of
a thrombus
SECTION
I
A
FIG. 7.4 Suggested mechanism of action for tumor necrosis factor (TNF). (A) TNF from cells of herniated
nucleus pulposus enters endoneurial capillaries and activates endothelial adhesion molecules. (B) Circulating
white blood cells (WBCs) adhere to vessel walls (1) and extravasate from capillaries out among axons owing to
TNF-induced increase in vascular permeability (2). TNF also induces accumulation of thrombocytes that form
intravascular thrombus (3). (C) There is local release of TNF from extravasated WBCs among axons that induce
myelin injury, accumulation of sodium channels, and allodynia in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and at the
spinal cord level. Thrombus, together with edema owing to increased permeability, induces nutritional decit in
the nerve root. Local eects of TNF and nutritional decit may induce pain and nerve dysfunction. CAM, cell
adhesion molecule; VCAM, vascular cell adhesion molecule. (From Olmarker K, Myers R, Kikuchi S, et al.
Pathophysiology of nerve root pain in disc herniation and spinal stenosis. In: Herkowitz H, Dvorak J, Bell G, et al,
eds. The Lumbar Spine. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004:11-30.)
Activation of adhesion
molecules (ICAM, VCAM)
Local release of TNF
Myelin injury
Accumulation of
Na-like channels
Induction of allodynia
in DRG and spinal cord
B
Decreased blood flow and
increased permeability
Nutritional deficit
2) Extravasation
of WBCs
Thrombus
injury to peripheral parts of the axons and by a direct eect
of TNF exposure and further enhances the impression that
TNF may be an important mediator of neuropathic pain. TNF
is a potent activator of cells; because it is retrogradely transported from the site of nerve injury to the dorsal root ganglion
and spinal cord, it may be this proinammatory stimulus that
activates central glia and neurons.
107
Apart from directly aecting the endoneurially located
axons, TNF may also indirectly interfere with the axons by
compromising the nutritional transport. TNF can induce
intravascular coagulation aer local application
the local blood ow in the intraneural capillaries.
119
; this reduces
54
TNF was found in disc cells and there is evidence that
elevated levels of TNF and its receptor, TNFR1. In herniated
lumbar discs correlated with the chronicity of postoperative
sciatic pain.
120
Specic TNF inhibitors, such as a monoclonal
antibody to TNF (iniximab) and a soluble TNF receptor
(etanercept) can inhibit pathophysiologic dysfunction. It has
been shown that iniximab may attenuate immunoreactivity
of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and may prevent neurologic and histologic changes in dorsal root ganglion in rats
aer experimental disc herniation.
121
More recent studies
reinforce the potential utility of cytokine inhibition in treating
the inammatory hyperalgesia induced by nucleus pulposus
and spinal nerve injury.
123
122
Application of certain cytokines to intraspinal nerves may
also increase the somatosensory neural response.
124
Discharges
from wide-dynamic-range neurons aer stimulation of a recep-
tor eld of a dorsal root ganglion exposed to nucleus pulposus
increased signicantly aer application. is increase may be
related to the sensitization of the sensory system caused by
proinammatory cytokines and the production of low-grade
spontaneous electrophysiologic activity in nociceptors by
104
TNF,
which by itself is an important factor that contributes
to sensitization. Administering an antibody specic for TNF
eciently inhibited this eect. An in vivo study assessing
changes in spontaneous behavior clearly showed that changes
induced by the combined action of mechanical deformation

126 BASIC SCIENCE
and disc incision were markedly inhibited by intraperitoneal
injection of a monoclonal antibody specic for TNF.
55
TNF seems to be an important mediator for the observed
eects on nerve function and for pain induced by local application of nucleus pulposus. Additional support for this
hypothesis comes from previous work that showed that
blockade of TNF upregulation in macrophages by thalidomide92 and downregulation of TNF by IL-10 administration
reduced the magnitude and duration of hyperalgesia aer
nerve injury. Because cytokine interactions are complex, other
cytokines such as IL-1β and IL-6 may be involved as well.
Because these cytokines are induced by TNF, as well as inducing TNF, their role is complex.
e possible role of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in
nerve root pathophysiology and experimental disc herniation
has been analyzed.
125
e appearance and distribution of
macrophages and TNF in the dorsal root ganglion of rats aer
experimental disc herniation and the relationship between
nerve growth factor and pain behavioral changes have been
described.
126
It has also been shown that disc-related cytokines
can inhibit axonal outgrowth from dorsal root ganglion cells
in vitro.
127
Clinical Use of Cytokine Inhibitors for Treatment of Sciatica
On the basis of the experimental ndings that TNF may mimic
nucleus pulposus–induced nerve dysfunction and pain, pilot
clinical trials regarding the possible use of TNF inhibition
for the treatment of sciatica were initiated. Karppinen and
colleagues
for TNF (iniximab [Remicade]) to 10 volunteers waiting
for surgery for radiologically veried disc herniations with
severe sciatica. In this open-label study, iniximab reduced
pain assessed by visual analog scale by 50% at 1 hour aer
infusion. Aer 2 weeks, 60% of the patients were pain free.
At 3 months aer the single infusion, 90% were pain free. No
adverse drug reactions were noted, and no patients required
surgery. A 1-year follow-up
iniximab showed that the benecial eect of a single infusion
of 3 mg/kg of iniximab for disc herniation–induced sciatica
was sustained in most patients. e authors also noted that
iniximab did not seem to interfere with spontaneous resorption of disc herniations.
the form of a soluble TNF receptor (etanercept [Enbrel]) by
three subcutaneous injections to 10 patients with severe sciatica. e patients had a 70% reduction of leg pain assessed
by visual analog scale 10 days aer starting the treatment. At
6 weeks, the reduction was 83%. e results were statistically
signicantly better than for 10 patients treated with three
intravenous injections of methylprednisolone.
leagues,
the TNF inhibitor etanercept was eective. e investigators
randomly assigned 24 patients with subacute radiculopathy
into three groups each consisting of eight patients. e patients
in each group received either 2, 4, or 6 mg on two occasions,
128
administered a monoclonal antibody specic
129
of the 10 patients treated with
Genevay and colleagues
130
administered a TNF inhibitor in
In one randomized study published by Cohen and col-
131
treatment of sciatica by local epidural injections of
and two of the eight patients were saline controls. All
etanercept-treated patients had signicant improvement 1
month aer treatment compared with saline-treated patients
regarding leg and back pain. e eects persisted 6 months
aer treatment in all but one patient. e authors concluded
that “etanercept holds promise as a treatment for lumbosacral
radiculopathy.”
131
Genevay and colleagues
132
published the
results of a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
on the use of the TNF inhibitor adalimumab (Humira) subcutaneously injected in 31 patients with severe, acute sciatica
caused by disc herniation. Two injections were given 7 days
apart; 30 control patients received placebo injections in the
same manner. e results showed that there was a signicantly
more favorable evolution of leg pain in the adalimumab group
than in the placebo group, but the eect size was relatively
small. ere were twice as many patients in the adalimumab
group who fullled the criteria for “responders,” and there
were signicantly fewer surgical discectomies in this group
compared with the placebo-treated controls.
e issue of anti-TNF therapy for human sciatica remains
complex. In spite of encouraging basic science studies in
experimental animals, its ecacy and utility in humans
remains unsettled.
positive results in animals and humans,
center, randomized trial by Cohen et al.
133
While there continues to be reports of
134
a second multi-
135
of 84 adults with
lumbosacral radiculopathy revealed only a short-term relief
for some of their patients. Issues of experimental design and
placebo eects complicate the interpretation of the results.
Indeed, this point is emphasized by Williams et al.,
119
who
performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of biologic
treatments targeting TNF-α for sciatica and concluded that
there was insucient evidence to recommend these agents
when treating sciatica. ey concluded, however, that additional studies are warranted.
Taken together, these observations indicate a potential
clinical eect of TNF inhibition in the treatment of sciatica.
It is unconrmed although provocative that early treatment
with TNF inhibition seems superior to late antiinammatory treatment by nonsteroidal antiinammatory drugs,
methylprednisolone, or even morphine in many patients. We
suggest that it is more ecient to target the responsible media-
tors of neuropathic pain early and directly before additional
dysfunction occurs than to treat a patient with conventional
antiinammatory drugs aer the neuropathic pain state has
fully developed. Sciatica has a neuropathic pain component,
and nonspecic antiinammatory medication and morphine
are less ecient in such conditions. Further studies must be
undertaken, however, before any denite conclusions regarding the ecacy of anti-TNF therapy for the treatment of
sciatica may be drawn.
Summary
e pathophysiology of sciatica is complex, with numerous substances and mechanisms acting at various levels of
the neural axis. ese mechanisms have attracted attention of basic scientists, and numerous studies looking into

Chapter 7 Nerve Root Pain in Disc Herniation and Spinal Stenosis 127
neuroimmunologic events have provided important insights
into the pathophysiologic mechanisms of the human disease
state. e intervertebral disc has certain biologic eects
that contribute directly to these pathophysiologic processes.
Epidural application of nucleus pulposus induces structural
and functional changes that relate closely to sciatica. e
nucleus pulposus also sensitizes nerve roots, producing a
painful condition. ese experimental observations correlate
with the clinical impression that preoperative touching of
nerve roots that have been exposed to disc herniation under
local anesthesia reproduces the sciatic pain and that surgical
removal of the mechanical compression of the nerve root oen
relieves symptoms.
e biologic substance of importance in the pathogenesis
of painful radiculopathy seems clearly at this stage of understanding to be TNF-α. e activation and upregulation of this
ubiquitous proinammatory cytokine produces acute pain and
neuropathologic changes associated with chronic pain states.
TNF stimulates broblast scar formation in a vicious cycle
whereby the local presence of TNF stimulates other cells to
upregulate this cytokine. Initiation of this cycle by the leakage
of TNF from herniated nucleus pulposus produces a cascade of
tissue injury, scar formation, and local pain. Superimposition
of mechanical injury to the nerve root in this environment
exacerbates the neural immune insult, causing macrophagemediated wallerian degeneration with signicant increases in
TNF concentrations. We suggest that these combined events
explain the problem of sciatica. Although the pathophysiology
of sciatica is far more complex than one might rst suspect,
future research is certain to reveal substances and mechanisms
of importance to the induction of symptoms in sciatica, and
such research would provide a basis for improved diagnosis
and treatment of this common disorder.
KEY REFERENCES
1. Mixter WJ, Barr JS. Rupture of the intervertebral disc with
involvement of the spinal canal. N Engl J Med. 1934;211:
210-215.
This article is about the discovery of the herniated disc.
2.
Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Nordborg C. Autologous nucleus
pulposus induces neurophysiologic and histologic changes in
porcine cauda equina nerve roots. Spine. 1993;18:1425-1432.
This study demonstrated the injurious eects of autologous nucleus
pulposus.
3.
Kawakami M, Weinstein JN, Chatani K, et al. Experimental lumbar
radiculopathy. Behavioral and histologic changes in a model of
radicular pain after spinal nerve root irritation with chromic gut
ligatures in the rat. Spine. 1994;19:1795-1802.
This early study examined nerve root pain in an experimental model.
4.
Olmarker K, Myers RR. Pathogenesis of sciatic pain: role of
herniated nucleus pulposus and deformation of spinal nerve
root and dorsal root ganglion. Pain. 1998;78:99-105.
This study was the rst to examine nerve root pain induced by
nucleus pulposus in an autologous system.
5.
Olmarker K, Larsson K. Tumor necrosis factor alpha and
nucleus-pulposus-induced nerve root injury. Spine.
1998;23:2538-2544.
This study linked a specic molecule to the pathophysiology of
sciatica.
6. Williams NH, Lewis R, Din NU, et al. A systematic review and
meta-analysis of biologic treatments targeting tumor necrosis
factor alpha for sciatica. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:1921-1935.
This review article summarizes current concepts regarding anti-TNF
therapy for sciatica.
REFERENCES
1. Mixter WJ, Barr JS. Rupture of the intervertebral disc with
involvement of the spinal canal. N Engl J Med. 1934;211:
210-215.
2. Gelfan S, Tarlov IM. Physiology of spinal cord, nerve root and
peripheral nerve compression. Am J Physiol. 1956;185:217-229.
3. Sharpless SK. Susceptibility of spinal nerve roots to
compression block: the research status of spinal manipulative
therapy. In: Goldstein M, ed. NIH Workshop: NINCDS
Monograph. 1975:155-161.
4. Olmarker K, Holm S, Rosenqvist AL, et al. Experimental
nerve root compression: a model of acute, graded
compression of the porcine cauda equina and an analysis of
neural and vascular anatomy. Spine. 1991;16:61-69.
5. Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Holm S, et al. Eects of experimental
graded compression on blood ow in spinal nerve roots: a
vital microscopic study on the porcine cauda equina. J Orthop
Res. 1989;7:817-823.
6. Sunderland S. e nerve lesion in the carpal tunnel. J Neurol
Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1976;39:615-626.
7. Rydevik B, Holm S, Brown MD, et al. Diusion from the
cerebrospinal uid as a nutritional pathway for spinal nerve
roots. Acta Physiol Scand. 1990;138:247-248.
8. Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Hansson T, et al.
Compression-induced changes of the nutritional supply to the
porcine cauda equina. J Spinal Disord. 1990;3:25-29.
9. Rydevik B, Lundborg G. Permeability of intraneural
microvessels and perineurium following acute, graded
experimental nerve compression. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg.
1977;11:179-187.
10. Myers RR, Murakami H, Powell HC. Reduced nerve blood
ow in edematous neuropathies: a biomechanical mechanism.
Microvasc Res. 1986;32:145-151.
11. Rydevik B, Lundborg G, Nordborg C. Intraneural tissue
reactions induced by internal neurolysis: an experimental
study on the blood-nerve barrier, connective tissues and
nerve bres of rabbit tibial nerve. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg.
1976;10:3-8.
12. Garn SR, Cohen MS, Massie JB, et al. Nerve-roots of
the cauda equina: the eect of hypotension and acute
graded compression on function. J Bone Joint Surg Am.
1990;72:1185-1192.
13. Pedowitz RA, Garn SR, Massie JB, et al. Eects of magnitude
and duration of compression on spinal nerve root conduction.
Spine. 1992;17:194-199.
14. Rydevik BL, Pedowitz RA, Hargens AR, et al. Eects of
acute, graded compression on spinal nerve root function and
structure: an experimental study of the pig cauda equina.
Spine. 1991;16:487-493.
15. Olmarker K, Lind B, Holm S, et al. Continued compression
increases impairment of impulse propagation in experimental
compression of the porcine cauda equina. Neuroorthopaedics.
1991;11:75-81.
16. Delamarter RB, Bohlman HH, Dodge LD, et al. Experimental
lumbar spinal stenosis: analysis of the cortical evoked
potentials, microvasculature, and histopathology. J Bone Joint
Surg Am. 1990;72:110-120.
SECTION
I

128 BASIC SCIENCE
17. Corneord M, Sato K, Olmarker K, et al. A model for chronic
nerve root compression studies: presentation of a porcine
model for controlled, slow-onset compression with analyses
of anatomic aspects, compression onset rate, and morphologic
and neurophysiologic eects. Spine. 1997;22:946-957.
18. Corneord M, Olmarker K, Farley DB, et al. Neuropeptide
changes in compressed spinal nerve roots. Spine.
1995;20:670-673.
19. Konno S, Olmarker K, Byrod G, et al. Intermittent cauda
equina compression: an experimental study of the porcine
cauda equina with analyses of nerve impulse conduction
properties. Spine. 1995;20:1223-1226.
20. Takahashi K, Miyazaki T, Takino T, et al. Epidural pressure
measurements: relationship between epidural pressure
and posture in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine.
1995;20:650-653.
21. Konno S, Yabuki S, Sato K, et al. A model for acute,
chronic, and delayed graded compression of the dog
cauda equina: presentation of the gross, microscopic, and
vascular anatomy of the dog cauda equina and accuracy
in pressure transmission of the compression model. Spine.
1995;20:2758-2764.
22. Porter RW, Ward D. Cauda equina dysfunction: the
signicance of two-level pathology. Spine. 1992;17:9-15.
23. Lundborg G. Structure and function of the intraneural
microvessels as related to trauma, edema formation, and
nerve function. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975;57:938-948.
24. Parke WW, Watanabe R. e intrinsic vasculature of the
lumbosacral spinal nerve roots. Spine. 1985;10:508-515.
25. Petterson CA, Olsson Y. Blood supply of spinal nerve roots:
an experimental study in the rat. Acta Neuropathol (Berl).
1989;78:455-461.
26. Corneord M, Takahashi K, Matsui Y, et al. Impairment
of nutritional transport at double-level cauda equina
compression: an experimental study. Neuroorthopaedics.
1992;11:107-112.
27. Schönström N, Bolender NF, Spengler DM, et al. Pressure
changes within the cauda equina following constriction
of the dural sac: an in vitro experimental study. Spine.
1984;9:604-607.
28. Schönström NS, Bolender NF, Spengler DM. e
pathomorphology of spinal stenosis as seen on CT scans of
the lumbar spine. Spine. 1985;10:806-811.
29. Takahashi K, Kagechika K, Takino T, et al. Changes in
epidural pressure during walking in patients with lumbar
spinal stenosis. Spine. 1995;20:2746-2749.
30. Howe JF, Loeser JD, Calvin WH. Mechanosensitivity of dorsal
root ganglia and chronically injured axons: a physiological
basis for the radicular pain of nerve root compression. Pain.
1977;3:25-41.
31. Cavanaugh JM, Ozaktay AC, Yamashita T, et al. Mechanisms
of low back pain: a neurophysiologic and neuroanatomic
study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;335:166-180.
32. Weinstein J, Pope M, Schmidt R, et al. Neuropharmacologic
eects of vibration on the dorsal root ganglion: an animal
model. Spine. 1988;13:521-525.
33. Omarker K, Myers RR. Pathogenesis of sciatic pain: role of
herniated nucleus pulposus and deformation of spinal nerve
root and dorsal root ganglion. Pain. 1998;78:99-105.
34. Olmarker K, Nutu M, Storkson R. Changes in spontaneous
behavior in rats exposed to experimental disc herniation
are blocked by selective TNF-alpha inhibition. Spine.
2003;28:1635-1641.
35. Myers R, Shubayev VI, Campana WM. Neuropathology of
painful neuropathies. In: Sommer C, ed. Pain in Peripheral
Nerve Disease. Basel: Karger; 2001:8-30.
36. Powell HC, Myers RR. Pathology of experimental nerve
compression. Lab Invest. 1986;55:91-100.
37. Myers RR, Yamamoto T, Yaksh TL, et al. e role of focal
nerve ischemia and wallerian degeneration in peripheral
nerve injury producing hyperesthesia. Anesthesiology.
1993;78:308-316.
38. Sommer C, Galbraith JA, Heckman HM, et al. Pathology
of experimental compression neuropathy producing
hyperesthesia. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1993;52:223-233.
39. Stoll G, Jander S, Myers RR. Degeneration and regeneration
of the peripheral nervous system: from Augustus Waller’s
observations to neuroinammation. J Peripher Nerv Syst.
2002;7:13-27.
40. Myers R, Wagner R, Sorkin LS. Hyperalgesic action of
cytokines on peripheral nerves. In: Watkins LR, Maier SF, eds.
Cytokines and Pain. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag; 1999:133-157.
41. Myers RR, Heckman HM, Powell HC. Axonal viability and
the persistence of thermal hyperalgesia aer partial freeze
lesions of nerve. J Neurol Sci. 1996;139:28-38.
42. Rydevik B, Brown MD, Lundborg G. Pathoanatomy and
pathophysiology of nerve root compression. Spine. 1984;
9:7-15.
43. Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Nordborg C. Autologous nucleus
pulposus induces neurophysiologic and histologic changes
in porcine cauda equina nerve roots. Spine. 1993;18:
1425-1432.
44. Olmarker K, Nordborg C, Larsson K, et al. Ultrastructural
changes in spinal nerve roots induced by autologous nucleus
pulposus. Spine. 1996;21:411-414.
45. Kayama S, Konno S, Olmarker K, et al. Incision of the
anulus brosus induces nerve root morphologic, vascular,
and functional changes: an experimental study. Spine.
1996;21:2539-2543.
46. Byrod G, Otani K, Brisby H, et al. Methylprednisolone
reduces the early vascular permeability increase in spinal
nerve roots induced by epidural nucleus pulposus application.
J Orthop Res. 2000;18:983-987.
47. Yabuki S, Kikuchi S, Olmarker K, et al. Acute eects of
nucleus pulposus on blood ow and endoneurial uid
pressure in rat dorsal root ganglia. Spine. 1998;23:2517-2523.
48. Byrod G, Rydevik B, Nordborg C, et al. Early eects
of nucleus pulposus application on spinal nerve root
morphology and function. Eur Spine J. 1998;7:445-449.
49. Olmarker K, Blomquist J, Stromberg J, et al. Inammatogenic
properties of nucleus pulposus. Spine. 1995;20:665-669.
50. Takino T, Takahashi K, Miyazaki T, et al. Immunoreactivity of
Nucleus Pulposus. 1995 Presented at International Society for
the Study of the Lumbar Spine, Helsinki, Finland.
51. Kawakami M, Tamaki T, Matsumoto T, et al. Role of
leukocytes in radicular pain secondary to herniated nucleus
pulposus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;376:268-277.
52. Myers RR, Heckman HM, Rodriguez M. Reduced
hyperalgesia in nerve-injured WLD mice: relationship
to nerve ber phagocytosis, axonal degeneration, and
regeneration in normal mice. Exp Neurol. 1996;141:
94-101.
53. Kawakami M, Matsumoto T, Hashizume H, et al. Epidural
injection of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor attenuates pain-related
behavior following application of nucleus pulposus to the
nerve root in the rat. J Orthop Res. 2002;20:376-381.

Chapter 7 Nerve Root Pain in Disc Herniation and Spinal Stenosis 129
54. Macnab I. Negative disc exploration: an analysis of the causes
of nerve-root involvement in sixty-eight patients. J Bone Joint
Surg Am. 1971;53:891-903.
55. Crock HV. Observations on the management of failed spinal
operations. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1976;58:193-199.
56. Jonsson B, Stromqvist B. Clinical appearance of contained
and noncontained lumbar disc herniation. J Spinal Disord.
1996;9:32-38.
57. Ito T, Takano Y, Yuasa N. Types of lumbar herniated disc and
clinical course. Spine. 2001;26:648-651.
58. Nygaard OP, Mellgren SI, Osterud B. e inammatory
properties of contained and noncontained lumbar disc
herniation. Spine. 1997;22:2484-2488.
59. Kuslich SD, Ulstrom CL, Michael CJ. e tissue origin of
low back pain and sciatica: a report of pain response to tissue
stimulation during operations on the lumbar spine using
local anesthesia. Orthop Clin North Am. 1991;22:
181-187.
60. Anzai H, Hamba M, Onda A, et al. Epidural application of
nucleus pulposus enhances nociresponses of rat dorsal horn
neurons. Spine. 2002;27:E50-E55.
61. Olmarker K, Rydevik B. Pathophysiology of sciatica. Orthop
Clin North Am. 1991;22:223-234.
62. El-Mahdi MA, Abdel Latif FY, Janko M. e spinal nerve root
“innervation,” and a new concept of the clinicopathological
interrelations in back pain and sciatica. Neurochirurgia
(Stuttg). 1981;24:137-141.
63. Edgar MA, Nundy S. Innervation of the spinal dura. J Neurol
Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1966;29:530-534.
64. Hoyland JA, Freemont AJ, Jayson MI. Intervertebral foramen
venous obstruction: a cause of periradicular brosis? Spine.
1989;14:558-568.
65. Cooper RG, Freemont AJ, Hoyland JA, et al. Herniated
intervertebral disc-associated periradicular brosis and
vascular abnormalities occur without inammatory cell
inltration. Spine. 1995;20:591-598.
66. Dalcanto MC, Wisniewski HM, Johnson AB, et al. Vesicular
disruption of myelin in autoimmune demyelination. J Neurol
Sci. 1975;24:313-319.
67. Hahn AF, Gilbert JJ, Feasby TE. Passive transfer of
demyelination by experimental allergic neuritis serum. Acta
Neuropathol (Berl). 1980;49:169-176.
68. Bisla RS, Marchisello PJ, Lockshin MD, et al.
Auto-immunological basis of disk degeneration. Clin Orthop
Relat Res. 1976;121:205-211.
69. Bobechko WP, Hirsch C. Auto-immune response to nucleus
pulposus in the rabbit. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1965;47:
574-580.
70. Gertzbein SD, Tile M, Gross A, Falk R. Autoimmunity in
degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine. Orthop Clin
North Am. 1975;6:67-73.
71. Gertzbein SD. Degenerative disk disease of the lumbar
spine: immunological implications. Clin Orthop Relat Res.
1977;129:68-71.
72. Gertzbein SD, Tait JH, Devlin SR. e stimulation
of lymphocytes by nucleus pulposus in patients with
degenerative disk disease of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop
Relat Res. 1977;123:149-154.
73. LaRocca H. New horizons in research on disc disease. Orthop
Clin North Am. 1971;2:521-531.
74. Naylor A. e biophysical and biochemical aspects of
intervertebral disc herniation and degeneration. Ann R Coll
Surg Engl. 1962;31:91-114.
75. Geiss A, Larsson K, Rydevik B, et al. Autoimmune properties
of nucleus pulposus: an experimental study in pigs. Spine.
2007;32:168-173.
76. Liu H, Shiryaev SA, Chernov AV, et al. Immunodominant
fragments of myelin basic protein initiate T cell-dependent
pain. J Neuroinammation. 2012;9:119.
77. Satoh K, Konno S, Nishiyama K, et al. Presence and
distribution of antigen-antibody complexes in the herniated
nucleus pulposus. Spine. 1999;24:1980-1984.
78. Bayliss MT, Johnstone B. Biochemistry of the intervertebral
disc. In: Jayson MIV, ed. e Lumbar Spine and Back Pain.
Edinburgh: Churchill-Livingstone; 1992:111-131.
79. Eyre D, Benya P, Buckwalter J. Intervertebral disc. In:
Frymoyer JW, Gordon SL, eds. New Perspectives on Low Back
Pain. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic
Surgeons; 1988:149-207.
80. Marshall LL, Trethewie ER. Chemical irritation of nerve-root
in disc prolapse. Lancet. 1973;2:320.
81. Marshall LL, Trethewie ER, Curtain CC. Chemical radiculitis:
a clinical, physiological and immunological study. Clin Orthop
Relat Res. 1977;129:61-67.
82. Brisby H, Byrod G, Olmarker K, et al. Nitric oxide as a
mediator of nucleus pulposus-induced eects on spinal nerve
roots. J Orthop Res. 2000;18:815-820.
83. Diamant B, Karlsson J, Nachemson A. Correlation between
lactate levels and pH in discs of patients with lumbar
rhizopathies. Experientia. 1968;24:1195-1196.
84. Nachemson A. Intradiscal measurements of pH in patients
with lumbar rhizopathies. Acta Orthop Scand. 1969;
40:23-42.
85. Pennington JB, McCarron RF, Laros GS. Identication of IgG
in the canine intervertebral disc. Spine. 1988;13:909-912.
86. Saal JS, Franson RC, Dobrow R, et al. High levels of
inammatory phospholipase A2 activity in lumbar disc
herniations. Spine. 1990;15:674-678.
87. Olmarker K, Larsson K. Tumor necrosis factor alpha
and nucleus-pulposus-induced nerve root injury. Spine.
1998;23:2538-2544.
88. McHale JF, Harari OA, Marshall D, et al. TNF-alpha and
IL-1 sequentially induce endothelial ICAM-1 and VCAM-1
expression in MRL/lpr lupus-prone mice. J Immunol.
1999;163:3993-4000.
89. McGee DW, Bamberg T, Vitkus SJ, et al. A synergistic
relationship between TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta, and TGF-beta 1
on IL-6 secretion by the IEC-6 intestinal epithelial cell line.
Immunology. 1995;86:6-11.
90. Satomi N, Haranaka K, Kunii O. Research on the production
site of tumor necrosis factor (TNF). Jpn J Exp Med.
1981;51:317-322.
91. Wagner R, Myers RR. Schwann cells produce tumor necrosis
factor alpha: expression in injured and non-injured nerves.
Neuroscience. 1996;73:625-629.
92. Sommer C, Marziniak M, Myers RR. e eect of
thalidomide treatment on vascular pathology and hyperalgesia
caused by chronic constriction injury of rat nerve. Pain.
1998;74:83-91.
93. Wagner R, Myers RR. Endoneurial injection of TNF-alpha
produces neuropathic pain behaviors. Neuroreport.
1996;7:2897-2901.
94. Igarashi T, Kikuchi S, Shubayev V, et al. Exogenous tumor
necrosis factor-alpha mimics nucleus pulposus-induced
neuropathology: molecular, histologic, and behavioral
comparisons in rats. Spine. 2000;25:2975-2980.
SECTION
I

130 BASIC SCIENCE
95. Liberski PP, Yanagihara R, Nerurkar V, et al. Further
ultrastructural studies of lesions produced in the optic nerve
by tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha): a comparison
with experimental Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Acta Neurobiol
Exp (Wars). 1994;54:209-218.
96. Madigan MC, Sadun AA, Rao NS, et al. Tumor necrosis
factor-alpha (TNF-alpha)-induced optic neuropathy in
rabbits. Neurol Res. 1996;18:176-184.
97. Redford EJ, Hall SM, Smith KJ. Vascular changes and
demyelination induced by the intraneural injection of tumour
necrosis factor. Brain. 1995;118(Pt 4):869-878.
98. Selmaj K, Raine CS. Tumor necrosis factor mediates myelin
damage in organotypic cultures of nervous tissue. Ann N Y
Acad Sci. 1988;540:568-570.
99. Stoll G, Jung S, Jander S, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha in
immune-mediated demyelination and wallerian degeneration
of the rat peripheral nervous system. J Neuroimmunol.
1993;45:175-182.
100. Nawroth P, Handley D, Matsueda G, et al. Tumor necrosis
factor/cachectin-induced intravascular brin formation
in meth A brosarcomas. J Exp Med. 1988;168:
637-647.
101. van der Poll T, Jansen PM, Van Zee KJ, et al. Tumor necrosis
factor-alpha induces activation of coagulation and brinolysis
in baboons through an exclusive eect on the p55 receptor.
Blood. 1996;88:922-927.
102. Watts ME, Arnold S, Chaplin DJ. Changes in coagulation
and permeability properties of human endothelial cells in
vitro induced by TNF-alpha or 5,6 MeXAA. Br J Cancer.
1996;74(suppl 27):S164-S167.
103. Viviani B, Corsini E, Galli CL, et al. Glia increase
degeneration of hippocampal neurons through release
of tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol.
1998;150:271-276.
104. Sorkin LS, Xiao WH, Wagner R, et al. Tumour necrosis
factor-alpha induces ectopic activity in nociceptive primary
aerent bres. Neuroscience. 1997;81:255-262.
105. Sommer C, Schmidt C, George A, et al. A
metalloprotease-inhibitor reduces pain associated behavior
in mice with experimental neuropathy. Neurosci Lett.
1997;237:45-48.
106. Shubayev VI, Myers RR. Upregulation and interaction of
TNFalpha and gelatinases A and B in painful peripheral nerve
injury. Brain Res. 2000;855:83-89.
107. Shubayev VI, Myers RR. Axonal transport of TNF-alpha in
painful neuropathy: distribution of ligand tracer and TNF
receptors. J Neuroimmunol. 2001;114:48-56.
108. Mattila P, Majuri ML, Mattila PS, et al. TNF alpha-induced
expression of endothelial adhesion molecules, ICAM-1 and
VCAM-1, is linked to protein kinase C activation. Scand J
Immunol. 1992;36:159-165.
109. Pober JS. Eects of tumour necrosis factor and related
cytokines on vascular endothelial cells. Ciba Found Symp.
1987;131:170-184.
110. Kagan BL, Baldwin RL, Munoz D, et al. Formation of
ion-permeable channels by tumor necrosis factor-alpha.
Science. 1992;255:1427-1430.
111. Baldwin RL, Stolowitz ML, Hood L, et al. Structural changes
of tumor necrosis factor alpha associated with membrane
insertion and channel formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.
1996;93:1021-1026.
112. Wei Y, Babilonia E, Pedraza PL, et al. Acute application
of TNF stimulates apical 70-pS K+ channels in the thick
ascending limb of rat kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol.
2003;285:F491-F497.
113. Selmaj K, Raine CS, Cross AH. Anti-tumor necrosis factor
therapy abrogates autoimmune demyelination. Ann Neurol.
1991;30:694-700.
114. Brisby H, Olmarker K, Rosengren L, et al. Markers of nerve
tissue injury in the cerebrospinal uid in patients with lumbar
disc herniation and sciatica. Spine. 1999;24:742-746.
115. Corneord M, Nyberg F, Rosengren L, et al. Cerebrospinal
uid biomarkers in experimental spinal nerve root injury.
Spine. 2004;29:1862-1868.
116. Brisby H, Balague F, Schafer D, et al. Glycosphingolipid
antibodies in serum in patients with sciatica. Spine.
2002;27:380-386.
117. Schafers M, Svensson CI, Sommer C, et al. Tumor necrosis
factor-alpha induces mechanical allodynia aer spinal nerve
ligation by activation of p38 MAPK in primary sensory
neurons. J Neurosci. 2003;23:2517-2521.
118. DeLeo JA, Rutkowski MD, Stalder AK, et al. Transgenic
expression of TNF by astrocytes increases mechanical
allodynia in a mouse neuropathy model. Neuroreport.
2000;11:599-602.
119. Williams NH, Lewis R, Din NU, et al. A systematic review
and meta-analysis of biological treatments targeting
tumor necrosis factor alpha for sciatica. Eur Spine J.
2013;22:1921-1935.
120. Andrade P, Hoogland G, Teernstra OP, et al. Elevated levels
of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and TNFR1 in recurrent
herniated lumbar discs correlate with chronicity of
postoperative sciatic pain. Spine J. 2016;16:243-251.
121. Onda A, Murata Y, Rydevik B, et al. Iniximab attenuates
immunoreactivity of brain-derived neurotrophic factor
in a rat model of herniated nucleus pulposus. Spine.
2004;29:1857-1861.
122. deSouza Grava AL, Ferrari LF, Deno HL. Cytokine
inhibition and time-related inuence of inammatory stimuli
on the hyperalgesia induced by the nucleus pulposus. Eur
Spine J. 2012;537-545.
123. Andrade P, Hoogland G, Del Rosario JS, et al. Tumor
necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors alleviation of experimental
induced neuropathic pain is associated with modulation of
TNF receptor expression. J Neurosci Res. 2014;92:
1490-1498.
124. Aoki Y, Rydevik B, Kikuchi S, et al. Local application
of disc-related cytokines on spinal nerve roots. Spine.
2002;27:1614-1617.
125. Onda A, Murata Y, Rydevik B, et al. Immunoreactivity of
brain-derived neurotrophic factor in rat dorsal root ganglion
and spinal cord dorsal horn following exposure to herniated
nucleus pulposus. Neurosci Lett. 2003;352:49-52.
126. Onda A, Murata Y, Rydevik B, et al. Nerve growth factor
content in dorsal root ganglion as related to changes in
pain behavior in a rat model of experimental lumbar disc
herniation. Spine. 2005;30:188-193.
127. Larsson K, Rydevik B, Olmarker K. Disc related cytokines
inhibit axonal outgrowth from dorsal root ganglion cells in
vitro. Spine. 2005;30:621-624.
128. Karppinen J, Korhonen T, Malmivaara A, et al. Tumor
necrosis factor-alpha monoclonal antibody, iniximab, used
to manage severe sciatica. Spine. 2003;28:750-753.
129. Korhonen T, Karppinen J, Malmivaara A, et al. Ecacy of
iniximab for disc herniation-induced sciatica: one-year
follow-up. Spine. 2004;29:2115-2119.

Chapter 7 Nerve Root Pain in Disc Herniation and Spinal Stenosis 131
130. Genevay S, Stingelin S, Gabay C. Ecacy of etanercept
in the treatment of acute severe sciatica. Ann Rheum Dis.
2004;63:1120-1123.
131. Cohen SP, Bogduk N, Dragovich A, et al. Randomized,
double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response, and
preclinical safety of transforaminal epidural etanercept for the
treatment of sciatica. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:1116-1126.
132. Genevay S, Viatte S, Finck A, et al. Adalimumab in
severe and acute sciatica: a multicentre, randomised,
double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum.
2010;62(8):2339-2346.
133. Cooper RG, Freemont AJ. TNF-alpha blockade for herniated
intervertebral disc-induced sciatica: a way forward at last?
[editorial]. Rheumatology. 2004;43:119-121.
134. Freeman BJC, Ludbrook GL, Hall S, et al. Randomized,
double-blind, placebo-controlled, trial of transforaminal
epidural etanercept for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar
disc herniation. Spine. 2013;38:1986-1994.
135. Cohen SP, White RL, Kurihara C, et al. Epidural steroids,
etanercept, or saline in subacute sciatica: a multicenter,
randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:551-559.
SECTION
I

This page intentionally left blank
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
