Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_6012_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
93 Мб
Скачать
Chapter 7 Nerve Root Pain in Disc Herniation and Spinal Stenosis 123
patients with obvious symptoms of disc herniation but with no visible herniation at radiologic examination or surgery.
54,55
e potential of nucleus pulposus material to induce pain has also been indicated in clinical studies that showed that non­contained herniations (the nucleus pulposus was in contact with the epidural space) were much more painful and had a more pronounced straight-leg raising test result than con­tained herniations.
56-58
Studies on rats using pain behavior assessment indicated that the nucleus pulposus is involved in pain production. Pain behavior in this context refers to response thresholds to thermal and mechanical stimulation. e role of the various anatomic components of the nerve root complex for the production of spinal pain was further elucidated by Cavanaugh and colleagues31 and Weinstein and colleagues.32 Other studies33 suggest a dose-response relationship between pain behavior and the amount of nucleus pulposus material in the epidural space. e combination of nucleus pulposus herniation and mechanical injury produces pain.33 is obser­vation is consistent with the neuropathologic understanding of pain and the consequences of combined mechanical and inammatory injury to nerve bers that are superimposed to increase the number of bers injured and the corresponding increase in proinammatory cytokines.
40,41
ese experimental studies on pain behavior suggest that the presence of nucleus pulposus has sensitized the nerve tissue. Minor compression of peripheral nerves is not painful, and touching of a normal nerve root during local anesthesia is not painful.59 Touching of a nerve root exposed to a disc her­niation oen reproduces the sciatic pain, however.59 Although
the combination of a mechanical component and the presence of nucleus pulposus seems to be a prerequisite to produce changes in the in vivo situation, more recent neurophysiologic studies have shown that the mere application of nucleus pulposus may induce increased neuronal pain transmission.
60
e spinal dura mater is known to contain nerve endings, and stimulation of the dura has been suggested as a mecha­nism for sciatic pain.
42,59,61,62
Irritation or stimulation of the dura as one important factor for sciatica is an interesting theory that could explain many clinical features. One may assume that the dura is segmentally innervated, the sensory nerves travel in a caudal-lateral direction, and the dura is drained to the corresponding nerve root by the nerve of Luschka.63 Stimulation of the dura at a point where dorsolat­eral disc herniations appear (1 in Fig. 7.3) might be recorded by the corresponding nerve root. At this location, the irritation may spread medially to the contralateral segment, producing bilateral symptoms, or laterally, producing symptoms from levels above. Similarly, a lateral disc herniation (2 in Fig. 7.3) could produce symptoms in the lower level.
If the pain of the straight-leg raising test is the result of dura irritation owing to friction to the herniated mass, one may consider the phenomenon of crossed straight-leg raising to be based on simultaneous stimulation of the contralateral dura. Such a “radiculitis” or “local meningitis” probably could be regarded as similar to peritonitis. When there is peritonitis, there is usually a reectory muscle contraction present over
the aected area. An analogue for this local meningitis could
2
FIG. 7.3 Suggested area of innervation by one recurrent sinuvertebral
nerve (nerve of Luschka). Disc herniation at location 1 may be recorded by the same nerve and by the nearby innervation areas, laterally and contralaterally, as indicated by arrows. At location 2, lateral disc herniation of disc one level below may aect same nerve root but also root one level
below, located medial to this root, as indicated by arrows. A, Thecal sac; B, dorsal root ganglion; C, intervertebral disc. (From Olmarker K. The experimental basis of sciatica. J Orthop Sci. 1996;1:230-242.)
A
B
C
be the reectory ipsilateral contraction of the spinal muscles, producing the “sciatic scoliosis” or lateral bending of the spine at the level of herniation.
Other Consequences of Herniated Nucleus Pulposus
Histologic observations have indicated that nerve root changes caused by nucleus pulposus are focal and mainly found in the center of the nerve roots, resembling a mononeuritis simplex that is induced by nerve infarction secondary to embolism of the intraneural vessels. Jayson and colleagues venous outow from the nerve roots owing to periradicular vascular changes, one must consider vascular impairment as one factor.
e inammatory components of nucleus pulposus may be involved in vascular and rheologic phenomena, such as coagu­lation, and may be involved in nerve root vascular embolism. It has been observed that the presence of nucleus pulposus may induce thrombus formation in microvessels.49 Inamma­tory mediators may also exert a direct eect on the myelin sheaths, as indicated by an electron microscopic study of nerve roots exposed to autologous nucleus pulposus in the pig.44 ere were signicant injuries of Schwann cells with vacuol­ization and disintegration of Schmidt-Lanterman incisures, which closely resembles the injury pattern of inammatory
43,44
Particularly in view of the work of
64,65
indicating an impairment of the
SECTION
I
124 BASIC SCIENCE
nerve disease.
66,67
As previously described, epidural applica­tion of nucleus pulposus induces an increase of the vascular permeability and a subsequent reduction of the blood ow in the adjacent nerve roots, which suggests vascular impairment as being of pathophysiologic importance.
It has also been suggested that because the nucleus pulposus is avascular and “hidden” from the systemic circulation, a presentation of the nucleus pulposus could result in an auto­immune reaction directed to antigens present in the nucleus pulposus and that bioactive substances from this reaction may injure the nerve tissue.
68-75
e work of Li and colleagues76 has demonstrated that there are autoimmune reactions not only to the disc but also to components from the nerve tissue that are released as the result of injury, such as basic myelin proteins. Another study also assessed the presence of immune complexes in herniated disc tissue obtained at surgery as an indicator of immunoactivation.77 Immunoglobulin G (IgG) was found in close relation to the disc cells in herniated disc material. No IgG was found, however, in the residual disc that was evacuated at the time of surgery. No immune complexes were found in control disc material obtained at spine surgery for other causes than pain.
Chemical Components of Nucleus Pulposus
e nucleus pulposus is composed mainly of proteoglycans, collagen, and cells. gained the most attention and has been suggested to have a direct irritating eect on nerve tissue. gen nor the cells have previously been suggested to be of pathophysiologic importance. More recent studies of the cells of the nucleus pulposus have shown, however, that these cells are capable of producing metalloproteinases such as collage­nase or gelatinase and interleukin (IL)-6 and prostaglandin E2 and do so spontaneously in culture.
Substances such as IgG, hydrogen ions, nitric oxide, and phospholipase A2 have also been suggested to be responsible for the pathophysiologic reactions. produced by the disc cells that has similar pathophysiologic eects as nucleus pulposus is tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α.
78,79
e proteoglycan component has
74,80,81
Neither the colla-
74,82-86
Another substance
87

Cytokines as Mediators of Nerve Dysfunction and Pain

TNF is known to be a regulatory proinammatory cytokine that has specic biologic eects and the ability to upregulate and act synergistically with other cytokines such as IL-1β and IL-6.
and upregulated by Schwann cells at the site of nerve injury91; this is followed by release and upregulation of TNF in many other endoneurial cells, including endothelial cells, broblasts,
and mast cells. is local production of TNF is the stimulus that results in macrophage attraction to the injury site,39 which contributes massively to the concentration of proin-
ammatory cytokines in the injured tissue. Several studies have shown that blocking TNF production or delaying the invasion of macrophages to the site of nerve injury results
88-90
Immediately aer nerve injury, TNF is released
in reduced or delayed neuropathologic change and reduced hyperalgesia.
52,92
TNF is known to induce axonal and myelin injury similar
96,98,103,104
93-99
intra-
and to
to that observed aer nucleus pulposus application, vascular coagulation,
102
it y.
TNF is also known to be neurotoxic induce painful behavioral changes activity when applied locally.
100-102
and increased vascular permeabil-
93,105
94,104
and ectopic nerve
TNF is sequestered in a membrane-bound form and is activated aer shedding by certain enzymes. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are particularly important in this regard. MMP-9 and MMP-2 are upregulated immediately aer a nerve injury.
106
MMPs process the inactive, membrane-bound form of TNF and its receptors to the biologically active form and are directly associated with breakdown of the blood-brain and blood-nerve barriers. MMP-9 and TNF receptors are also retrogradely transported from the site of nerve injury to the corresponding dorsal root ganglion and spinal cord,
107
where they may have a direct role in gene regulation. is may relate to the observation that cell membranes of disc cells are sucient to mediate the nucleus
pulposus–induced eects.
TNF induces activation of endothelial adhesion molecules such as intercellular and vascular cell adhesion molecules, adhering circulating immune cells to the vessel walls (Fig.
88,108,109
7.4).
As a consequence of the TNF-induced increased vascular permeability, these cells migrate into the endoneurial space where the axons are located. e cells release their content of TNF and other cytokines, which may induce accumulation of ion channels locally in the axonal membranes.
110-112
e channels may allow for an increased passage of sodium and potassium, which may result in spontaneous discharges and in discharges of ectopic impulses aer mechanical stimula-
tion. TNF by itself can cause spontaneous electrical activity in A-delta and C nociceptors.
104
Such discharges, whether they
come from a pain ber or a nerve ber transmitting other
sensory information, are interpreted as pain by the brain.
Previous studies have also indicated that local application of nucleus pulposus may disintegrate the myelin sheath also a known eect of TNF.
113
is injury could also contribute
42,43
; this is
to the formation of ectopic impulses and to the sensitization to mechanical stimulus. Experimental and clinical studies have shown that nerve root compression and disc herniation can induce increased concentrations of neurolament in the cerebrospinal uid.
114,115
Increased levels of serum antibodies against one or more nervous system–associated glycosphin­golipids have been shown in patients with sciatica and disc herniation, indicating a possible autoimmune response.
116
More recent work regarding molecular events in the patho­physiology of neuropathic pain has suggested a potential role of TNF for inducing allodynia.
94,117,118
TNF may mediate the formation of allodynia in the dorsal root ganglion and at the spinal cord level because of its local upregulation, which occurs via a positive feedback loop caused by TNF itself. is cycle seems to be broken by a direct eect of TNF on the upregulation of antiinammatory cytokines such as IL-10, which eventually leads to a reduction of TNF and the physi­ologic balance of proinammatory and antiinammatory cytokines. Such regulation seems to be induced by mechanical
TNF
C
Pain and nerve dysfunction
Aggregation of
Endoneurial capillary
Chapter 7 Nerve Root Pain in Disc Herniation and Spinal Stenosis 125
3)
1) Adhesion of circulating WBCs
thrombocytes and formation of a thrombus
SECTION
I
A
FIG. 7.4 Suggested mechanism of action for tumor necrosis factor (TNF). (A) TNF from cells of herniated
nucleus pulposus enters endoneurial capillaries and activates endothelial adhesion molecules. (B) Circulating white blood cells (WBCs) adhere to vessel walls (1) and extravasate from capillaries out among axons owing to TNF-induced increase in vascular permeability (2). TNF also induces accumulation of thrombocytes that form intravascular thrombus (3). (C) There is local release of TNF from extravasated WBCs among axons that induce myelin injury, accumulation of sodium channels, and allodynia in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and at the spinal cord level. Thrombus, together with edema owing to increased permeability, induces nutritional decit in the nerve root. Local eects of TNF and nutritional decit may induce pain and nerve dysfunction. CAM, cell adhesion molecule; VCAM, vascular cell adhesion molecule. (From Olmarker K, Myers R, Kikuchi S, et al. Pathophysiology of nerve root pain in disc herniation and spinal stenosis. In: Herkowitz H, Dvorak J, Bell G, et al, eds. The Lumbar Spine. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004:11-30.)
Activation of adhesion molecules (ICAM, VCAM)
Local release of TNF
Myelin injury Accumulation of Na-like channels Induction of allodynia in DRG and spinal cord
B
Decreased blood flow and increased permeability Nutritional deficit
2) Extravasation of WBCs
Thrombus
injury to peripheral parts of the axons and by a direct eect of TNF exposure and further enhances the impression that TNF may be an important mediator of neuropathic pain. TNF is a potent activator of cells; because it is retrogradely trans­ported from the site of nerve injury to the dorsal root ganglion and spinal cord, it may be this proinammatory stimulus that activates central glia and neurons.
107
Apart from directly aecting the endoneurially located axons, TNF may also indirectly interfere with the axons by compromising the nutritional transport. TNF can induce intravascular coagulation aer local application
the local blood ow in the intraneural capillaries.
119
; this reduces
54
TNF was found in disc cells and there is evidence that elevated levels of TNF and its receptor, TNFR1. In herniated lumbar discs correlated with the chronicity of postoperative sciatic pain.
120
Specic TNF inhibitors, such as a monoclonal antibody to TNF (iniximab) and a soluble TNF receptor (etanercept) can inhibit pathophysiologic dysfunction. It has been shown that iniximab may attenuate immunoreactivity
of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and may prevent neuro­logic and histologic changes in dorsal root ganglion in rats aer experimental disc herniation.
121
More recent studies reinforce the potential utility of cytokine inhibition in treating the inammatory hyperalgesia induced by nucleus pulposus
and spinal nerve injury.
123
122
Application of certain cytokines to intraspinal nerves may
also increase the somatosensory neural response.
124
Discharges
from wide-dynamic-range neurons aer stimulation of a recep-
tor eld of a dorsal root ganglion exposed to nucleus pulposus increased signicantly aer application. is increase may be
related to the sensitization of the sensory system caused by proinammatory cytokines and the production of low-grade
spontaneous electrophysiologic activity in nociceptors by
104
TNF,
which by itself is an important factor that contributes to sensitization. Administering an antibody specic for TNF eciently inhibited this eect. An in vivo study assessing changes in spontaneous behavior clearly showed that changes induced by the combined action of mechanical deformation
126 BASIC SCIENCE
and disc incision were markedly inhibited by intraperitoneal injection of a monoclonal antibody specic for TNF.
55
TNF seems to be an important mediator for the observed
eects on nerve function and for pain induced by local appli­cation of nucleus pulposus. Additional support for this hypothesis comes from previous work that showed that blockade of TNF upregulation in macrophages by thalido­mide92 and downregulation of TNF by IL-10 administration reduced the magnitude and duration of hyperalgesia aer
nerve injury. Because cytokine interactions are complex, other cytokines such as IL-1β and IL-6 may be involved as well. Because these cytokines are induced by TNF, as well as induc­ing TNF, their role is complex.
e possible role of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in nerve root pathophysiology and experimental disc herniation has been analyzed.
125
e appearance and distribution of macrophages and TNF in the dorsal root ganglion of rats aer experimental disc herniation and the relationship between nerve growth factor and pain behavioral changes have been described.
126
It has also been shown that disc-related cytokines can inhibit axonal outgrowth from dorsal root ganglion cells in vitro.
127
Clinical Use of Cytokine Inhibitors for Treatment of Sciatica
On the basis of the experimental ndings that TNF may mimic nucleus pulposus–induced nerve dysfunction and pain, pilot clinical trials regarding the possible use of TNF inhibition for the treatment of sciatica were initiated. Karppinen and colleagues for TNF (iniximab [Remicade]) to 10 volunteers waiting
for surgery for radiologically veried disc herniations with severe sciatica. In this open-label study, iniximab reduced pain assessed by visual analog scale by 50% at 1 hour aer
infusion. Aer 2 weeks, 60% of the patients were pain free. At 3 months aer the single infusion, 90% were pain free. No adverse drug reactions were noted, and no patients required surgery. A 1-year follow-up
iniximab showed that the benecial eect of a single infusion of 3 mg/kg of iniximab for disc herniation–induced sciatica was sustained in most patients. e authors also noted that iniximab did not seem to interfere with spontaneous resorp­tion of disc herniations.
the form of a soluble TNF receptor (etanercept [Enbrel]) by three subcutaneous injections to 10 patients with severe sci­atica. e patients had a 70% reduction of leg pain assessed by visual analog scale 10 days aer starting the treatment. At
6 weeks, the reduction was 83%. e results were statistically signicantly better than for 10 patients treated with three
intravenous injections of methylprednisolone.
leagues, the TNF inhibitor etanercept was eective. e investigators
randomly assigned 24 patients with subacute radiculopathy into three groups each consisting of eight patients. e patients in each group received either 2, 4, or 6 mg on two occasions,
128
administered a monoclonal antibody specic
129
of the 10 patients treated with
Genevay and colleagues
130
administered a TNF inhibitor in
In one randomized study published by Cohen and col-
131
treatment of sciatica by local epidural injections of
and two of the eight patients were saline controls. All etanercept-treated patients had signicant improvement 1
month aer treatment compared with saline-treated patients regarding leg and back pain. e eects persisted 6 months aer treatment in all but one patient. e authors concluded that “etanercept holds promise as a treatment for lumbosacral radiculopathy.”
131
Genevay and colleagues
132
published the results of a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial on the use of the TNF inhibitor adalimumab (Humira) sub­cutaneously injected in 31 patients with severe, acute sciatica caused by disc herniation. Two injections were given 7 days apart; 30 control patients received placebo injections in the same manner. e results showed that there was a signicantly
more favorable evolution of leg pain in the adalimumab group than in the placebo group, but the eect size was relatively
small. ere were twice as many patients in the adalimumab group who fullled the criteria for “responders,” and there were signicantly fewer surgical discectomies in this group compared with the placebo-treated controls.
e issue of anti-TNF therapy for human sciatica remains complex. In spite of encouraging basic science studies in experimental animals, its ecacy and utility in humans
remains unsettled. positive results in animals and humans, center, randomized trial by Cohen et al.
133
While there continues to be reports of
134
a second multi-
135
of 84 adults with lumbosacral radiculopathy revealed only a short-term relief for some of their patients. Issues of experimental design and placebo eects complicate the interpretation of the results.
Indeed, this point is emphasized by Williams et al.,
119
who
performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of biologic treatments targeting TNF-α for sciatica and concluded that there was insucient evidence to recommend these agents
when treating sciatica. ey concluded, however, that addi­tional studies are warranted.
Taken together, these observations indicate a potential
clinical eect of TNF inhibition in the treatment of sciatica.
It is unconrmed although provocative that early treatment with TNF inhibition seems superior to late antiinamma­tory treatment by nonsteroidal antiinammatory drugs, methylprednisolone, or even morphine in many patients. We suggest that it is more ecient to target the responsible media-
tors of neuropathic pain early and directly before additional dysfunction occurs than to treat a patient with conventional antiinammatory drugs aer the neuropathic pain state has fully developed. Sciatica has a neuropathic pain component, and nonspecic antiinammatory medication and morphine are less ecient in such conditions. Further studies must be undertaken, however, before any denite conclusions regard­ing the ecacy of anti-TNF therapy for the treatment of sciatica may be drawn.

Summary

e pathophysiology of sciatica is complex, with numer­ous substances and mechanisms acting at various levels of the neural axis. ese mechanisms have attracted atten­tion of basic scientists, and numerous studies looking into
Chapter 7 Nerve Root Pain in Disc Herniation and Spinal Stenosis 127
neuroimmunologic events have provided important insights into the pathophysiologic mechanisms of the human disease state. e intervertebral disc has certain biologic eects that contribute directly to these pathophysiologic processes. Epidural application of nucleus pulposus induces structural and functional changes that relate closely to sciatica. e nucleus pulposus also sensitizes nerve roots, producing a painful condition. ese experimental observations correlate with the clinical impression that preoperative touching of nerve roots that have been exposed to disc herniation under local anesthesia reproduces the sciatic pain and that surgical removal of the mechanical compression of the nerve root oen
relieves symptoms.
e biologic substance of importance in the pathogenesis
of painful radiculopathy seems clearly at this stage of under­standing to be TNF-α. e activation and upregulation of this ubiquitous proinammatory cytokine produces acute pain and
neuropathologic changes associated with chronic pain states. TNF stimulates broblast scar formation in a vicious cycle whereby the local presence of TNF stimulates other cells to upregulate this cytokine. Initiation of this cycle by the leakage of TNF from herniated nucleus pulposus produces a cascade of tissue injury, scar formation, and local pain. Superimposition of mechanical injury to the nerve root in this environment exacerbates the neural immune insult, causing macrophage­mediated wallerian degeneration with signicant increases in TNF concentrations. We suggest that these combined events explain the problem of sciatica. Although the pathophysiology of sciatica is far more complex than one might rst suspect, future research is certain to reveal substances and mechanisms of importance to the induction of symptoms in sciatica, and such research would provide a basis for improved diagnosis and treatment of this common disorder.

KEY REFERENCES

1. Mixter WJ, Barr JS. Rupture of the intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal canal. N Engl J Med. 1934;211: 210-215.
This article is about the discovery of the herniated disc.
2.
Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Nordborg C. Autologous nucleus
pulposus induces neurophysiologic and histologic changes in porcine cauda equina nerve roots. Spine. 1993;18:1425-1432.
This study demonstrated the injurious eects of autologous nucleus pulposus.
3.
Kawakami M, Weinstein JN, Chatani K, et al. Experimental lumbar
radiculopathy. Behavioral and histologic changes in a model of radicular pain after spinal nerve root irritation with chromic gut ligatures in the rat. Spine. 1994;19:1795-1802.
This early study examined nerve root pain in an experimental model.
4.
Olmarker K, Myers RR. Pathogenesis of sciatic pain: role of
herniated nucleus pulposus and deformation of spinal nerve root and dorsal root ganglion. Pain. 1998;78:99-105.
This study was the rst to examine nerve root pain induced by nucleus pulposus in an autologous system.
5.
Olmarker K, Larsson K. Tumor necrosis factor alpha and
nucleus-pulposus-induced nerve root injury. Spine. 1998;23:2538-2544.
This study linked a specic molecule to the pathophysiology of sciatica.
6. Williams NH, Lewis R, Din NU, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of biologic treatments targeting tumor necrosis factor alpha for sciatica. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:1921-1935.
This review article summarizes current concepts regarding anti-TNF therapy for sciatica.

REFERENCES

1. Mixter WJ, Barr JS. Rupture of the intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal canal. N Engl J Med. 1934;211: 210-215.
2. Gelfan S, Tarlov IM. Physiology of spinal cord, nerve root and peripheral nerve compression. Am J Physiol. 1956;185:217-229.
3. Sharpless SK. Susceptibility of spinal nerve roots to compression block: the research status of spinal manipulative therapy. In: Goldstein M, ed. NIH Workshop: NINCDS Monograph. 1975:155-161.
4. Olmarker K, Holm S, Rosenqvist AL, et al. Experimental nerve root compression: a model of acute, graded compression of the porcine cauda equina and an analysis of neural and vascular anatomy. Spine. 1991;16:61-69.
5. Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Holm S, et al. Eects of experimental
graded compression on blood ow in spinal nerve roots: a vital microscopic study on the porcine cauda equina. J Orthop Res. 1989;7:817-823.
6. Sunderland S. e nerve lesion in the carpal tunnel. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1976;39:615-626.
7. Rydevik B, Holm S, Brown MD, et al. Diusion from the cerebrospinal uid as a nutritional pathway for spinal nerve roots. Acta Physiol Scand. 1990;138:247-248.
8. Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Hansson T, et al. Compression-induced changes of the nutritional supply to the porcine cauda equina. J Spinal Disord. 1990;3:25-29.
9. Rydevik B, Lundborg G. Permeability of intraneural microvessels and perineurium following acute, graded experimental nerve compression. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;11:179-187.
10. Myers RR, Murakami H, Powell HC. Reduced nerve blood ow in edematous neuropathies: a biomechanical mechanism. Microvasc Res. 1986;32:145-151.
11. Rydevik B, Lundborg G, Nordborg C. Intraneural tissue reactions induced by internal neurolysis: an experimental study on the blood-nerve barrier, connective tissues and nerve bres of rabbit tibial nerve. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;10:3-8.
12. Garn SR, Cohen MS, Massie JB, et al. Nerve-roots of the cauda equina: the eect of hypotension and acute graded compression on function. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:1185-1192.
13. Pedowitz RA, Garn SR, Massie JB, et al. Eects of magnitude and duration of compression on spinal nerve root conduction. Spine. 1992;17:194-199.
14. Rydevik BL, Pedowitz RA, Hargens AR, et al. Eects of acute, graded compression on spinal nerve root function and structure: an experimental study of the pig cauda equina. Spine. 1991;16:487-493.
15. Olmarker K, Lind B, Holm S, et al. Continued compression increases impairment of impulse propagation in experimental compression of the porcine cauda equina. Neuroorthopaedics. 1991;11:75-81.
16. Delamarter RB, Bohlman HH, Dodge LD, et al. Experimental lumbar spinal stenosis: analysis of the cortical evoked potentials, microvasculature, and histopathology. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:110-120.
SECTION
I
128 BASIC SCIENCE
17. Corneord M, Sato K, Olmarker K, et al. A model for chronic nerve root compression studies: presentation of a porcine model for controlled, slow-onset compression with analyses of anatomic aspects, compression onset rate, and morphologic and neurophysiologic eects. Spine. 1997;22:946-957.
18. Corneord M, Olmarker K, Farley DB, et al. Neuropeptide changes in compressed spinal nerve roots. Spine. 1995;20:670-673.
19. Konno S, Olmarker K, Byrod G, et al. Intermittent cauda equina compression: an experimental study of the porcine cauda equina with analyses of nerve impulse conduction properties. Spine. 1995;20:1223-1226.
20. Takahashi K, Miyazaki T, Takino T, et al. Epidural pressure measurements: relationship between epidural pressure and posture in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1995;20:650-653.
21. Konno S, Yabuki S, Sato K, et al. A model for acute, chronic, and delayed graded compression of the dog cauda equina: presentation of the gross, microscopic, and vascular anatomy of the dog cauda equina and accuracy in pressure transmission of the compression model. Spine. 1995;20:2758-2764.
22. Porter RW, Ward D. Cauda equina dysfunction: the signicance of two-level pathology. Spine. 1992;17:9-15.
23. Lundborg G. Structure and function of the intraneural microvessels as related to trauma, edema formation, and nerve function. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975;57:938-948.
24. Parke WW, Watanabe R. e intrinsic vasculature of the
lumbosacral spinal nerve roots. Spine. 1985;10:508-515.
25. Petterson CA, Olsson Y. Blood supply of spinal nerve roots: an experimental study in the rat. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 1989;78:455-461.
26. Corneord M, Takahashi K, Matsui Y, et al. Impairment of nutritional transport at double-level cauda equina compression: an experimental study. Neuroorthopaedics. 1992;11:107-112.
27. Schönström N, Bolender NF, Spengler DM, et al. Pressure changes within the cauda equina following constriction of the dural sac: an in vitro experimental study. Spine. 1984;9:604-607.
28. Schönström NS, Bolender NF, Spengler DM. e pathomorphology of spinal stenosis as seen on CT scans of the lumbar spine. Spine. 1985;10:806-811.
29. Takahashi K, Kagechika K, Takino T, et al. Changes in epidural pressure during walking in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1995;20:2746-2749.
30. Howe JF, Loeser JD, Calvin WH. Mechanosensitivity of dorsal root ganglia and chronically injured axons: a physiological basis for the radicular pain of nerve root compression. Pain. 1977;3:25-41.
31. Cavanaugh JM, Ozaktay AC, Yamashita T, et al. Mechanisms of low back pain: a neurophysiologic and neuroanatomic study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;335:166-180.
32. Weinstein J, Pope M, Schmidt R, et al. Neuropharmacologic
eects of vibration on the dorsal root ganglion: an animal model. Spine. 1988;13:521-525.
33. Omarker K, Myers RR. Pathogenesis of sciatic pain: role of herniated nucleus pulposus and deformation of spinal nerve root and dorsal root ganglion. Pain. 1998;78:99-105.
34. Olmarker K, Nutu M, Storkson R. Changes in spontaneous behavior in rats exposed to experimental disc herniation are blocked by selective TNF-alpha inhibition. Spine. 2003;28:1635-1641.
35. Myers R, Shubayev VI, Campana WM. Neuropathology of painful neuropathies. In: Sommer C, ed. Pain in Peripheral Nerve Disease. Basel: Karger; 2001:8-30.
36. Powell HC, Myers RR. Pathology of experimental nerve compression. Lab Invest. 1986;55:91-100.
37. Myers RR, Yamamoto T, Yaksh TL, et al. e role of focal nerve ischemia and wallerian degeneration in peripheral nerve injury producing hyperesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1993;78:308-316.
38. Sommer C, Galbraith JA, Heckman HM, et al. Pathology of experimental compression neuropathy producing hyperesthesia. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1993;52:223-233.
39. Stoll G, Jander S, Myers RR. Degeneration and regeneration of the peripheral nervous system: from Augustus Waller’s observations to neuroinammation. J Peripher Nerv Syst.
2002;7:13-27.
40. Myers R, Wagner R, Sorkin LS. Hyperalgesic action of cytokines on peripheral nerves. In: Watkins LR, Maier SF, eds. Cytokines and Pain. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag; 1999:133-157.
41. Myers RR, Heckman HM, Powell HC. Axonal viability and the persistence of thermal hyperalgesia aer partial freeze
lesions of nerve. J Neurol Sci. 1996;139:28-38.
42. Rydevik B, Brown MD, Lundborg G. Pathoanatomy and pathophysiology of nerve root compression. Spine. 1984; 9:7-15.
43. Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Nordborg C. Autologous nucleus pulposus induces neurophysiologic and histologic changes in porcine cauda equina nerve roots. Spine. 1993;18: 1425-1432.
44. Olmarker K, Nordborg C, Larsson K, et al. Ultrastructural changes in spinal nerve roots induced by autologous nucleus pulposus. Spine. 1996;21:411-414.
45. Kayama S, Konno S, Olmarker K, et al. Incision of the anulus brosus induces nerve root morphologic, vascular,
and functional changes: an experimental study. Spine. 1996;21:2539-2543.
46. Byrod G, Otani K, Brisby H, et al. Methylprednisolone reduces the early vascular permeability increase in spinal nerve roots induced by epidural nucleus pulposus application. J Orthop Res. 2000;18:983-987.
47. Yabuki S, Kikuchi S, Olmarker K, et al. Acute eects of
nucleus pulposus on blood ow and endoneurial uid pressure in rat dorsal root ganglia. Spine. 1998;23:2517-2523.
48. Byrod G, Rydevik B, Nordborg C, et al. Early eects of nucleus pulposus application on spinal nerve root morphology and function. Eur Spine J. 1998;7:445-449.
49. Olmarker K, Blomquist J, Stromberg J, et al. Inammatogenic properties of nucleus pulposus. Spine. 1995;20:665-669.
50. Takino T, Takahashi K, Miyazaki T, et al. Immunoreactivity of Nucleus Pulposus. 1995 Presented at International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine, Helsinki, Finland.
51. Kawakami M, Tamaki T, Matsumoto T, et al. Role of leukocytes in radicular pain secondary to herniated nucleus pulposus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;376:268-277.
52. Myers RR, Heckman HM, Rodriguez M. Reduced hyperalgesia in nerve-injured WLD mice: relationship to nerve ber phagocytosis, axonal degeneration, and regeneration in normal mice. Exp Neurol. 1996;141: 94-101.
53. Kawakami M, Matsumoto T, Hashizume H, et al. Epidural injection of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor attenuates pain-related behavior following application of nucleus pulposus to the nerve root in the rat. J Orthop Res. 2002;20:376-381.
Chapter 7 Nerve Root Pain in Disc Herniation and Spinal Stenosis 129
54. Macnab I. Negative disc exploration: an analysis of the causes of nerve-root involvement in sixty-eight patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971;53:891-903.
55. Crock HV. Observations on the management of failed spinal operations. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1976;58:193-199.
56. Jonsson B, Stromqvist B. Clinical appearance of contained and noncontained lumbar disc herniation. J Spinal Disord. 1996;9:32-38.
57. Ito T, Takano Y, Yuasa N. Types of lumbar herniated disc and clinical course. Spine. 2001;26:648-651.
58. Nygaard OP, Mellgren SI, Osterud B. e inammatory properties of contained and noncontained lumbar disc herniation. Spine. 1997;22:2484-2488.
59. Kuslich SD, Ulstrom CL, Michael CJ. e tissue origin of low back pain and sciatica: a report of pain response to tissue stimulation during operations on the lumbar spine using local anesthesia. Orthop Clin North Am. 1991;22: 181-187.
60. Anzai H, Hamba M, Onda A, et al. Epidural application of nucleus pulposus enhances nociresponses of rat dorsal horn neurons. Spine. 2002;27:E50-E55.
61. Olmarker K, Rydevik B. Pathophysiology of sciatica. Orthop Clin North Am. 1991;22:223-234.
62. El-Mahdi MA, Abdel Latif FY, Janko M. e spinal nerve root “innervation,” and a new concept of the clinicopathological interrelations in back pain and sciatica. Neurochirurgia (Stuttg). 1981;24:137-141.
63. Edgar MA, Nundy S. Innervation of the spinal dura. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1966;29:530-534.
64. Hoyland JA, Freemont AJ, Jayson MI. Intervertebral foramen venous obstruction: a cause of periradicular brosis? Spine. 1989;14:558-568.
65. Cooper RG, Freemont AJ, Hoyland JA, et al. Herniated intervertebral disc-associated periradicular brosis and vascular abnormalities occur without inammatory cell inltration. Spine. 1995;20:591-598.
66. Dalcanto MC, Wisniewski HM, Johnson AB, et al. Vesicular disruption of myelin in autoimmune demyelination. J Neurol Sci. 1975;24:313-319.
67. Hahn AF, Gilbert JJ, Feasby TE. Passive transfer of demyelination by experimental allergic neuritis serum. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 1980;49:169-176.
68. Bisla RS, Marchisello PJ, Lockshin MD, et al. Auto-immunological basis of disk degeneration. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;121:205-211.
69. Bobechko WP, Hirsch C. Auto-immune response to nucleus pulposus in the rabbit. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1965;47: 574-580.
70. Gertzbein SD, Tile M, Gross A, Falk R. Autoimmunity in degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine. Orthop Clin North Am. 1975;6:67-73.
71. Gertzbein SD. Degenerative disk disease of the lumbar spine: immunological implications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977;129:68-71.
72. Gertzbein SD, Tait JH, Devlin SR. e stimulation of lymphocytes by nucleus pulposus in patients with degenerative disk disease of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977;123:149-154.
73. LaRocca H. New horizons in research on disc disease. Orthop Clin North Am. 1971;2:521-531.
74. Naylor A. e biophysical and biochemical aspects of intervertebral disc herniation and degeneration. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1962;31:91-114.
75. Geiss A, Larsson K, Rydevik B, et al. Autoimmune properties of nucleus pulposus: an experimental study in pigs. Spine. 2007;32:168-173.
76. Liu H, Shiryaev SA, Chernov AV, et al. Immunodominant fragments of myelin basic protein initiate T cell-dependent pain. J Neuroinammation. 2012;9:119.
77. Satoh K, Konno S, Nishiyama K, et al. Presence and distribution of antigen-antibody complexes in the herniated nucleus pulposus. Spine. 1999;24:1980-1984.
78. Bayliss MT, Johnstone B. Biochemistry of the intervertebral disc. In: Jayson MIV, ed. e Lumbar Spine and Back Pain. Edinburgh: Churchill-Livingstone; 1992:111-131.
79. Eyre D, Benya P, Buckwalter J. Intervertebral disc. In: Frymoyer JW, Gordon SL, eds. New Perspectives on Low Back Pain. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1988:149-207.
80. Marshall LL, Trethewie ER. Chemical irritation of nerve-root in disc prolapse. Lancet. 1973;2:320.
81. Marshall LL, Trethewie ER, Curtain CC. Chemical radiculitis: a clinical, physiological and immunological study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977;129:61-67.
82. Brisby H, Byrod G, Olmarker K, et al. Nitric oxide as a mediator of nucleus pulposus-induced eects on spinal nerve
roots. J Orthop Res. 2000;18:815-820.
83. Diamant B, Karlsson J, Nachemson A. Correlation between lactate levels and pH in discs of patients with lumbar rhizopathies. Experientia. 1968;24:1195-1196.
84. Nachemson A. Intradiscal measurements of pH in patients with lumbar rhizopathies. Acta Orthop Scand. 1969; 40:23-42.
85. Pennington JB, McCarron RF, Laros GS. Identication of IgG in the canine intervertebral disc. Spine. 1988;13:909-912.
86. Saal JS, Franson RC, Dobrow R, et al. High levels of inammatory phospholipase A2 activity in lumbar disc herniations. Spine. 1990;15:674-678.
87. Olmarker K, Larsson K. Tumor necrosis factor alpha and nucleus-pulposus-induced nerve root injury. Spine. 1998;23:2538-2544.
88. McHale JF, Harari OA, Marshall D, et al. TNF-alpha and IL-1 sequentially induce endothelial ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 expression in MRL/lpr lupus-prone mice. J Immunol. 1999;163:3993-4000.
89. McGee DW, Bamberg T, Vitkus SJ, et al. A synergistic relationship between TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta, and TGF-beta 1 on IL-6 secretion by the IEC-6 intestinal epithelial cell line. Immunology. 1995;86:6-11.
90. Satomi N, Haranaka K, Kunii O. Research on the production site of tumor necrosis factor (TNF). Jpn J Exp Med. 1981;51:317-322.
91. Wagner R, Myers RR. Schwann cells produce tumor necrosis factor alpha: expression in injured and non-injured nerves. Neuroscience. 1996;73:625-629.
92. Sommer C, Marziniak M, Myers RR. e eect of thalidomide treatment on vascular pathology and hyperalgesia caused by chronic constriction injury of rat nerve. Pain. 1998;74:83-91.
93. Wagner R, Myers RR. Endoneurial injection of TNF-alpha produces neuropathic pain behaviors. Neuroreport. 1996;7:2897-2901.
94. Igarashi T, Kikuchi S, Shubayev V, et al. Exogenous tumor necrosis factor-alpha mimics nucleus pulposus-induced neuropathology: molecular, histologic, and behavioral comparisons in rats. Spine. 2000;25:2975-2980.
SECTION
I
130 BASIC SCIENCE
95. Liberski PP, Yanagihara R, Nerurkar V, et al. Further ultrastructural studies of lesions produced in the optic nerve by tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha): a comparison with experimental Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 1994;54:209-218.
96. Madigan MC, Sadun AA, Rao NS, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha)-induced optic neuropathy in rabbits. Neurol Res. 1996;18:176-184.
97. Redford EJ, Hall SM, Smith KJ. Vascular changes and demyelination induced by the intraneural injection of tumour necrosis factor. Brain. 1995;118(Pt 4):869-878.
98. Selmaj K, Raine CS. Tumor necrosis factor mediates myelin damage in organotypic cultures of nervous tissue. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988;540:568-570.
99. Stoll G, Jung S, Jander S, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha in immune-mediated demyelination and wallerian degeneration of the rat peripheral nervous system. J Neuroimmunol. 1993;45:175-182.
100. Nawroth P, Handley D, Matsueda G, et al. Tumor necrosis factor/cachectin-induced intravascular brin formation in meth A brosarcomas. J Exp Med. 1988;168: 637-647.
101. van der Poll T, Jansen PM, Van Zee KJ, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha induces activation of coagulation and brinolysis in baboons through an exclusive eect on the p55 receptor.
Blood. 1996;88:922-927.
102. Watts ME, Arnold S, Chaplin DJ. Changes in coagulation and permeability properties of human endothelial cells in vitro induced by TNF-alpha or 5,6 MeXAA. Br J Cancer. 1996;74(suppl 27):S164-S167.
103. Viviani B, Corsini E, Galli CL, et al. Glia increase degeneration of hippocampal neurons through release of tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1998;150:271-276.
104. Sorkin LS, Xiao WH, Wagner R, et al. Tumour necrosis factor-alpha induces ectopic activity in nociceptive primary aerent bres. Neuroscience. 1997;81:255-262.
105. Sommer C, Schmidt C, George A, et al. A metalloprotease-inhibitor reduces pain associated behavior in mice with experimental neuropathy. Neurosci Lett. 1997;237:45-48.
106. Shubayev VI, Myers RR. Upregulation and interaction of TNFalpha and gelatinases A and B in painful peripheral nerve injury. Brain Res. 2000;855:83-89.
107. Shubayev VI, Myers RR. Axonal transport of TNF-alpha in painful neuropathy: distribution of ligand tracer and TNF receptors. J Neuroimmunol. 2001;114:48-56.
108. Mattila P, Majuri ML, Mattila PS, et al. TNF alpha-induced expression of endothelial adhesion molecules, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1, is linked to protein kinase C activation. Scand J Immunol. 1992;36:159-165.
109. Pober JS. Eects of tumour necrosis factor and related cytokines on vascular endothelial cells. Ciba Found Symp. 1987;131:170-184.
110. Kagan BL, Baldwin RL, Munoz D, et al. Formation of ion-permeable channels by tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Science. 1992;255:1427-1430.
111. Baldwin RL, Stolowitz ML, Hood L, et al. Structural changes of tumor necrosis factor alpha associated with membrane insertion and channel formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:1021-1026.
112. Wei Y, Babilonia E, Pedraza PL, et al. Acute application of TNF stimulates apical 70-pS K+ channels in the thick
ascending limb of rat kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2003;285:F491-F497.
113. Selmaj K, Raine CS, Cross AH. Anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy abrogates autoimmune demyelination. Ann Neurol. 1991;30:694-700.
114. Brisby H, Olmarker K, Rosengren L, et al. Markers of nerve tissue injury in the cerebrospinal uid in patients with lumbar
disc herniation and sciatica. Spine. 1999;24:742-746.
115. Corneord M, Nyberg F, Rosengren L, et al. Cerebrospinal uid biomarkers in experimental spinal nerve root injury. Spine. 2004;29:1862-1868.
116. Brisby H, Balague F, Schafer D, et al. Glycosphingolipid antibodies in serum in patients with sciatica. Spine. 2002;27:380-386.
117. Schafers M, Svensson CI, Sommer C, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha induces mechanical allodynia aer spinal nerve
ligation by activation of p38 MAPK in primary sensory neurons. J Neurosci. 2003;23:2517-2521.
118. DeLeo JA, Rutkowski MD, Stalder AK, et al. Transgenic expression of TNF by astrocytes increases mechanical allodynia in a mouse neuropathy model. Neuroreport. 2000;11:599-602.
119. Williams NH, Lewis R, Din NU, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of biological treatments targeting tumor necrosis factor alpha for sciatica. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:1921-1935.
120. Andrade P, Hoogland G, Teernstra OP, et al. Elevated levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and TNFR1 in recurrent herniated lumbar discs correlate with chronicity of postoperative sciatic pain. Spine J. 2016;16:243-251.
121. Onda A, Murata Y, Rydevik B, et al. Iniximab attenuates
immunoreactivity of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in a rat model of herniated nucleus pulposus. Spine. 2004;29:1857-1861.
122. deSouza Grava AL, Ferrari LF, Deno HL. Cytokine inhibition and time-related inuence of inammatory stimuli on the hyperalgesia induced by the nucleus pulposus. Eur Spine J. 2012;537-545.
123. Andrade P, Hoogland G, Del Rosario JS, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors alleviation of experimental induced neuropathic pain is associated with modulation of TNF receptor expression. J Neurosci Res. 2014;92: 1490-1498.
124. Aoki Y, Rydevik B, Kikuchi S, et al. Local application of disc-related cytokines on spinal nerve roots. Spine. 2002;27:1614-1617.
125. Onda A, Murata Y, Rydevik B, et al. Immunoreactivity of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in rat dorsal root ganglion and spinal cord dorsal horn following exposure to herniated nucleus pulposus. Neurosci Lett. 2003;352:49-52.
126. Onda A, Murata Y, Rydevik B, et al. Nerve growth factor content in dorsal root ganglion as related to changes in pain behavior in a rat model of experimental lumbar disc herniation. Spine. 2005;30:188-193.
127. Larsson K, Rydevik B, Olmarker K. Disc related cytokines inhibit axonal outgrowth from dorsal root ganglion cells in vitro. Spine. 2005;30:621-624.
128. Karppinen J, Korhonen T, Malmivaara A, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha monoclonal antibody, iniximab, used to manage severe sciatica. Spine. 2003;28:750-753.
129. Korhonen T, Karppinen J, Malmivaara A, et al. Ecacy of
iniximab for disc herniation-induced sciatica: one-year follow-up. Spine. 2004;29:2115-2119.
Chapter 7 Nerve Root Pain in Disc Herniation and Spinal Stenosis 131
130. Genevay S, Stingelin S, Gabay C. Ecacy of etanercept
in the treatment of acute severe sciatica. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:1120-1123.
131. Cohen SP, Bogduk N, Dragovich A, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response, and preclinical safety of transforaminal epidural etanercept for the treatment of sciatica. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:1116-1126.
132. Genevay S, Viatte S, Finck A, et al. Adalimumab in severe and acute sciatica: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(8):2339-2346.
133. Cooper RG, Freemont AJ. TNF-alpha blockade for herniated intervertebral disc-induced sciatica: a way forward at last? [editorial]. Rheumatology. 2004;43:119-121.
134. Freeman BJC, Ludbrook GL, Hall S, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, trial of transforaminal epidural etanercept for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. Spine. 2013;38:1986-1994.
135. Cohen SP, White RL, Kurihara C, et al. Epidural steroids, etanercept, or saline in subacute sciatica: a multicenter, randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:551-559.
SECTION
I
This page intentionally left blank