Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 911 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
8 Мб
Скачать
456
https://t.me/medicina_free
63.
NONTRAUMATIC INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE
Deepak Sharma and Julia Metzner
CLINICALCASE
A 46- year- old woman with a history of diabetes mellitus suered sudden onset of severe headache followed by a loss of consciousness. She regained consciousness on hos­pital arrival following placement of an external ventricular drain (EVD). She was drowsy but had no focal neurolog­ical decits. Her blood pressure is 136/ 90 mmHg, Na + 128 mEq/ L, K +3.2 mEq/ L, and blood glucose 256 mg/ dl. Electrocardiogram (ECG) revealed ST segment depression in leads II and AVL. Contrast computed tomography (CT) shows subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in the anterior interhemispheric ssure and le sylvian ssure and a le middle cerebral artery aneurysm.
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OFTHE DISEASESTATE
Subarachnoid hemorrhage occurs when rupture of an arte­riovenous malformation (AVM) or aneurysm leads to the release of blood into the subarachnoid space. Less oen it
release of catecholamines, which leads to the extracranial manifestations of SAH such as stress cardiomyopathy, car­diac arrhythmias, hyperglycemia, and neurogenic pulmo­nary edema.1 Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels are frequently elevated aer SAH, and a syndrome of inappro­priate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) or cerebral salt wasting can cause hyponatremia.
1
Complications of SAH include rebleeding, hydroceph­alus, delayed cerebral ischemia associated with cerebral vasospasm, and seizures. Blockage of arachnoid granula­tions can lead to delayed, nonobstructive, communicating hydrocephalus. Symptomatic cerebral vasospasm develops in approximately 20%– 40% of patients with SAH, and may cause permanent neurological decits. It is a reversi­ble vasculopathy of the intracranial arteries associated with impaired cerebral autoregulation, reduced cerebral perfu­sion, and ischemic insults known as delayed ischemic neu­rologic decits (DINDs). Cerebral vasospasm is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients withSAH.
may be caused by trauma or a bleeding disorder. e blood in the subarachnoid space spreads through the cerebrospi­nal uid (CSF) and causes meningeal irritation with nuchal
ASSESSMENT OFTHE PATIENT:PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION
rigidity. Sudden accumulation of blood and obstruction of the CSF drainage can cause an acute increase in intracra­nial pressure (ICP) and early obstructive, noncommunicat­ing hydrocephalus, necessitating the emergent placement of an EVD. Symptoms including headache, nausea, vomiting, and loss of consciousness result from acutely increased ICP and reduced cerebral perfusion. e increase in ICP follow­ing the rupture of an aneurysm causes some degree of tam­ponade that may decrease further bleeding. In addition to SAH, aneurysms and AVMs can also rupture into the ven­tricular system or cause intracerebral hemorrhage.
e initial hemorrhage may be fatal in 20%– 30% of patients. In survivors, cerebral autoregulation and cerebro­vascular reactivity to carbon dioxide may be impaired.1 e intracranial hemorrhage causes a sympathetic surge with
e preoperative assessment should incorporate clinical grading of the SAH, typically using the modied Hunt and Hess grading system (Table 63.1)2 or the World Federation of Neurological Surgeons’ (WFNS) grad­ing system (Table 63.2).3 ese grading systems not only allow assessment of perioperative morbidity and commu­nication between physicians but also indicate the severity of cerebral pathophysiology as well as extracranial sequela of SAH. Placement of an EVD early aer admission may improve the neurologic condition of the patient by 1– 2 grades. e Fisher grading on CT scan is commonly used to assess the risk of cerebral vasospasm by evaluating the pattern of hemorrhage with SAH.4 While the surgery cannot be delayed signicantly in patients with ruptured
456
https://t.me/medicina_free
457
TABLE63.1 MODIFIED HUNT AND HESS GRADING SYSTEM
FORANEURYSMAL SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE
Grade Neurological Status
2
It is important to know the date of rupture of the cerebral aneurysm as cerebral vasospasm typically sets in 4– 5days later. Most patients with SAH usually have their aneurysm secured before this time period to avoid both
0 Unruptured aneur ysm
1 Asymptomatic or mild headache and slight nuchal
rigidity
2 Severe headache, stiff neck, no neurologic decit
except cranial nerve palsy
3 Drowsy or confused, mild focal neurologic decit
4 Stuporous, moderate or severe hemiparesis
5 Coma, decerebrate posturing
1 higher grade is assigned if cerebral vasospasm or presence of serious systemic disease
(hypertension, diabetes, severe atherosclerosis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)
the risk of cerebral vasospasm during the procedure and to minimize the time interval when rebleeding could occur. Review of the cerebral angiogram helps assess collateral cerebral circulation and identify other nonruptured aneu­rysms, in addition to examining the characteristics of the aneurysm itself such as neck size, diameter, lobular appear­ance, fusiform shape, and soforth.
Cerebral AVMs present with acute intracranial hemor­rhage or with seizures, focal neurological decits, headache, or hydrocephalus. e presence of multiple intracranial AVMs should raise the suspicion of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). e AVMs are graded using the
aneurysms, they are typically stabilized over 1– 2 days, with EVDs for control of ICP, management of hyperten­sion, and evaluation of clinically signicant cardiac dys­function or other coexisting illnesses. e ICP should be monitored and treated, avoiding sudden drainage of large volumes of CSF, which can cause rebleeding. e intensiv­ists should initiate correction of uid, electrolyte, and glu­cose derangements. Patients with neurogenic pulmonary
Spetzler- Martin system based on the size, pattern of venous drainage, and neurological eloquence of the adjacent brain.6 Although most patients undergo preoperative endovascu­lar embolization to decrease the vascularity of the AVM, the anesthesiologist should be prepared for intraoperative bleeding requiring transfusion. Another major concern is the risk of hyperemic complications leading to hemorrhage and edema aer resection ofAVM.
edema may require mechanical ventilation.
Electrocardiogram abnormalities such as ST segment depression, T- wave inversion, appearance of U- waves, and prolonged QT interval occur commonly aer SAH and are usually of neurogenic rather than cardiogenic origin.5 Severe myocardial dysfunction with regional wall motion abnormalities (neurogenic stress cardiomyopathy) are rela­tively uncommon but well- known cardiac sequelae asso-
ANESTHETIC MANAGEMENT
Proper case management requires an understanding of the nuances of care to be delivered during a variety of circum­stances ranging from induction and emergence to intra­operative intracranial hemorrhage and aneurysm clipping, each of which is discussedbelow.
ciated with SAH. Cardiac troponin Ilevels and 12- lead ECGs may be useful to detect cardiac ischemia in this set­ting. In rare cases, patients with severe cardiac dysfunction may not be suitable candidates for craniotomy and may instead undergo endovascular coiling of the aneurysm.
Induction ofAnesthesia/ Emergent Intubation
Anesthesiologists may be called to the emergency room (ER) or intensive care unit (ICU) to intubate patients who have suered an SAH for airway protection, airway
TABLE63.2 THE WORLD FEDERATION OFNEUROLOGICAL
SURGEONS (WFNS) GRADING SCALE FORINTRACRANIAL ANEURYSMS
WFNS Grade
3
Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score
1 15
2 13–14
Motor Decits
obstruction, or hypoxemia from aspiration or ash pulmo­nary edema. Aer standard preparation for an emergent intubation, preoxygenation should be managed carefully to avoid agitation and a hypertensive response. e biggest concern during laryngoscopy and intubation is the avoid­ance of hypertension, as it can cause an increase in the trans­mural pressure across the aneurysm wall and precipitate rebleeding. Likewise, it may cause bleeding from an AVM
3 13–14 +
4 7–12 +/ −
5 3–6 +/ -
although the risk may be lower. Ahypertensive response to intubation can be attenuated using opioids, lidocaine, beta blockers, or calcium channel blockers. e eect of suc­cinylcholine on ICP is oen debated, though it has been
NONTRAUMATIC INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE 457
458
https://t.me/medicina_free
shown to have no detrimental eect on ICP and anesthesi­ologists should not hesitate to use it if anticipating a di­cult airway.1 Placement of an arterial line prior to induction of anesthesia for surgery allows close monitoring of blood pressure and can guide rapid treatment if needed. As always, hypoxia, hypercarbia, and hypotension should be avoided, as they can precipitate or worsen cerebral ischemia.
vasodilation, it is oen preferred in situations with elevated ICP, with more modest use of hyperventilation.
e eect of anesthetics on evoked potential signal quality should be considered while selecting the anesthetic agent. While the inhalational agents cause dose- dependent increases in latency and decreases in amplitude of somato­sensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), less than 1.0 MAC con­centration is usually compatible with monitoring of cortical
Choice ofAnesthetic Agents and Evoked Potential Monitoring
e choice of intravenous or inhaled anesthetic agents is based on the patient’s neurological condition, proposed procedure, coexisting diseases, and planned neurophysi­ological monitoring. Volatile anesthetic agents decrease the cerebral metabolic rate (CMR), but also cause direct cere­bral vasodilation and increased cerebral blood ow (CBF), particularly at concentrations greater than 1.0 MAC (mini­mum alveolar concentration). In patients with reduced intracranial compliance, this “luxury perfusion” can cause further increases in ICP and brain swelling, making surgical exposure dicult (Box 63.1). ough the cerebral vasodila-
SSEPs. Propofol anesthesia has a minimal eect on SSEPs and is occasionally preferred in situations where the SSEPs may be impaired at baseline and are critical to the surgical procedure.7 If motor evoked potentials (MEPs) are moni­tored, propofol anesthesia is frequently preferred, especially in patients with preexisting neurological decits, because it aects MEP amplitude and latency signicantly less than volatile anesthetics. For patients without preexisting neuro­logical decits, desurane used in concentrations less than
0.5 MAC is also compatible with MEP monitoring in most patients.8 Monitoring MEPs also precludes the use of neu­romuscular blocking agents aer intubation. Volatile anes­thetic agents may be used with brainstem evoked potentials, as they have very little eect on these signals.
tory eect of inhalational agents may be oset by hyperven­tilation, it is dicult to estimate the exact PaCO2 needed to avoid cerebral ischemia without specialized moni­toring. Because propofol does not cause direct cerebral
Monitoring
Besides the standard ASA monitors, an arterial line should be placed for continuous blood pressure monitoring, for sampling PaCO2, glucose levels, and electrolytes as well as
BOX 63.1 INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE MANAGEMENT AND
BRAIN RELAXATION
for measuring pulse pressure variability to guide uid status. Acentral venous line may be placed to supplement vascular access, facilitate infusion of total intravenous anesthesia
The strategies for ICP control and brain relaxation include:
Maintenance of adequate depth of anesthesia and
analgesia
Optimal positioning (slight head elevation and avoiding
excessive neck exion or rotation) to maximize
intracranial venous outow.
(TIVA) and medications such as hypertonic saline, phe­nytoin, or vasoactive infusions. e EVD should be used to monitor ICP and to drain CSF at the specic request of the surgeon. Specialized monitoring such as jugular venous oximetry, electroencephalogram (EEG), SSEPs, and MEPs, may be used to guide determination of blood pressure and PaCO2 targets to minimize the risk of cerebral ischemia.9
Selection of volatile versus propofol anesthetics
based on assessment of intracranial compliance.
Administration of mannitol or hypertonicsaline
e EEG may also be used to titrate anesthetic doses for burst suppression during temporary clipping of aneurysms. Monitoring SSEPs and MEPs guides maintenance of ade­quate perfusion to the “at- risk” brain, particularly during
Controlled hyperventilation (aggressive hyperventilation
should not be instituted before dural opening because
the resulting decrease in the transmural pressure can
cause rebleeding)
temporary clipping.
Temporary Clipping forAneurysms
CSF Drainage (should be used cautiously considering
the potential risk of rebleeding with rapid CSF
drainage, particularly before dural opening)
458 SECTION A. CEREBRAL ORIGIN
e treatment of aneurysms may involve the placement of a temporary clip to occlude the parent vessel proximal to the aneurysm. e temporary clip reduces blood ow through the aneurysm, allowing for the dissection and
https://t.me/medicina_free
459
accurate placement of a permanent clip without the risk of catastrophic bleeding. Hypotension and excessive hyper­ventilation should be avoided during temporary clipping. e blood pressure is typically increased to 10%– 20% above baseline during temporary clipping to recruit collat­eral blood ow to the territory at risk of ischemia. Another strategy to avoid cerebral ischemia during temporary clip­ping is to decrease the CMR by administration of a bolus
by normal perfusion pressure breakthrough (NPPB).13 High- ow AVMs have very low resistance, causing impaired autoregulation that is shied leward. Following removal of the low- resistance AVM, the capillary beds and arterioles in the “normal” parenchyma are now subjected to a much higher resistance that may exceed their ability to vasocon­strict to prevent excessive increases in blood ow, even at normal perfusion pressures.
13
dose of anesthetic agent (propofol or etomidate) to induce burst suppression on EEG. e reduction in CMR may
Immediate Postoperative Management
prolong the tolerance of reduced blood ow, although the eectiveness of this technique is questionable.1 Induced hypothermia has not been shown to be benecial and can­not be recommended for neuroprotection in patients with good gradeSAH.
10
Postoperatively, the patients should be closely monitored for adequacy of oxygenation and ventilation, hemody­namic stability, pain control, and neurological recovery. Opioids should be used judiciously for postoperative pain management, avoiding overdose- related adverse eects
Intraoperative Intracranial Hemorrhage
Eective communication between the neurosurgeon, anesthesiologist, and the operating room sta is critical while dealing with ongoing blood loss. If there is acute bleeding from the aneurysm during surgery and proxi­mal control is not achieved, the surgeon may request a short period of induced hypotension. Short- acting agents such as nicardipine and esmolol are best suited for such situations, and the depth of anesthesia may be increased
such as respiratory depression, carbon dioxide retention, increased CBF, and ICP. Other alternatives include intra­operative local anesthetic scalp inltration, and intrave­nous paracetamol. Selective serotonin (5- HT3) receptor antagonists are the rst- choice drugs for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) because of their favorable safety prole. For rescue of PONV meto­clopramide, droperidol, or scopolamine may be used. Postoperative hypertension is undesirable particularly in patients withAVMs.
by administration of a propofol bolus to cause burst suppression before such interventions. In select cases, a
CASE- BASED LEARNING DISCUSSION
brief cardiac standstill may be induced using adenosine. Circulatory arrest induced by adenosine allows the sur­geon to place a temporary clip to control the bleeding and has been found to be safe and eective to facilitate the management of intraoperative aneurysmal rupture.11 A dose of 0.3– 0.4 mg/ kg ideal body weight provides approximately 45 seconds of profound systemic hypoten­sion.12 Assessment of estimated blood loss, maintenance of euvolemia, and avoidance of excessive hyperventilation are important to provide adequate cerebral perfusion. Previous blood pressure goals should be restored as soon
1. What is this patient’s modied Hunt and Hess grade, and what are the implications for outcome and management?
2. e ECG shows ST segment depression in leads II and aVL, and the patient is requiring vasoactive medications to maintain a mean arterial pressure of 70mmHg. What is the implication? Will you proceed with the anesthetic or ask for further investigations? Why/ why not? If yes, what investigations?Why?
as the bleeding is controlled.
3. e patient who takes chronic high- dose opioids
Hemodynamic Management During Emergence
Hypertension is undesirable before the aneurysm is clipped because it can precipitate rebleeding. Once, the aneurysm is secured, the blood pressure can be normalized. However, patients with AVMs dier from patients with aneurysms in that blood pressure needs to be kept below the preoperative baseline even aer the AVM has been resected to prevent hyperemic complications (hemorrhage and edema) caused
for back pain arrives to the operating room without a functioning arterial line. Will you proceed with anesthesia induction without an arterial line? How will you prevent hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation?
4. Prior to dural opening, the surgeon complains that she cannot do the operation because the brain is bulging. What options do you have to maximize brain relaxation?
NONTRAUMATIC INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE 459
460
https://t.me/medicina_free
5. e surgeon reports that she anticipates this aneurysm will be dicult to clip and that she will be using temporary clips. How will you minimize the risk of cerebral ischemia during temporary clipping? Will
BOX 63.2 PREDISPOSING FACTORS FORPITUITARY TUMOR
APOPLEXY
Traumatic braininjury
you consider hypothermia for brain protection? Why/ whynot?
Uncontrolled high or low blood pressures
6. During dissection and before temporary clips are placed, the aneurysm ruptures and the blood pressure increases to 189/ 105mmHg. What is your rst response? What medications can you use to lower the blood pressure? What is the role of adenosine­induced temporary ow arrest in the control of intraoperative intracerebral hemorrhage? What are the contraindications to the use of adenosine?
PITUITARY APOPLEXY
CLINICALCASE
A 60- year- old male presented to the emergency department with sudden onset of headache, ptosis, and blurred vision in the le eye. Neurologic examination revealed that he was confused and had visual loss in the le eye and le occulo-
Major surgery (coronary artery bypass or stenting)
Anticoagulation therapy
Estrogen or dopamine agonist therapy
Dynamic pituitary function testing
Radiotherapy
Pregnancy
and electrolyte abnormalities such as hyponatremia. yrotropin and gonadotropin deciencies occur in 50%– 75% of patients.15 Occasionally, low prolactin levels or diabetes insipidus may be present. Pituitary apoplexy is a neurosurgical emergency, and urgent decompression is usually necessary to save vision and prevent catastrophic hypopituitarism. Box 63.2 lists the potential factors pre-
disposing to apoplexy. motor nerve palsy. An emergency MRI conrmed pituitary adenoma with acute hemorrhage and compression of the optic chiasm. Adecision to proceed with endoscopic endo­nasal tumor decompression wasmade.
MANAGEMENT
Urgent transsphenoidal decompression of the optic chiasm
and adjacent neuronal tissues is the mainstay of therapy.
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OFTHE DISEASESTATE
However, in stable patients, a conservative pharmacological
approach with steroids and hormonal supplements and rig­Pituitary apoplexy results from sudden enlargement of the
sellar gland caused by spontaneous hemorrhage or infarc­tion into a pituitary tumor. e clinical manifestation is oen dramatic and is characterized by severe headache,
orous management of uid and electrolyte balance is oen
favored. Studies have failed to show a dierence in the long-
term outcomes of conservatively and surgically managed
patients.
16
nausea, occulomotor nerve palsy (diplopia), altered men­tal status, and hypopituitarism.14 e expanding pituitary tumor causes direct compression on the adjacent tissue with an interruption of its blood supply. Aprecipitous
ANESTHETIC MANAGEMENT
Preoperative Preparation
rise in the contents of the sella yields to an abrupt increase in the intrapituitary pressure, which triggers the neuro­logical and endocrine manifestations. Alarge tumor can surpass its vascular supply, leading to hemorrhage or isch­emia of the pituitary. Visual eld decits are related to the compression of the optic chiasm or optic nerves from an increase in the tumor mass or hematoma. Apoplexy is associated with hypopituitarism in more than 80% of the cases.15 e most serious decit involves ACTH (adre­nocorticotrophic hormone), causing severe hypotension
In addition to the standard evaluation of a neurosurgical
patient, preoperative screening should include assessment
of hormone deciencies, electrolyte imbalance, and signs
and symptoms of raised ICP (Box 63.3). Intravenous treat-
ment with hydrocortisone should be initiated in order to
avoid hemodynamic instability and acute adrenal insu-
ciency. Some patients may have acromegaly from the pitu-
itary tumor, which may complicate airway management.
Any delays in surgery must be avoided.
460 SECTION A. CEREBRAL ORIGIN
https://t.me/medicina_free
461
Strategies to facilitate smooth emergence include low- dose
BOX 63.3 GOALS OFANESTHETIC MANAGEMENT
FORSURGERY FORPITUITARY APOPLEXY
1. Correct uid and electrolyte imbalances and administer
hydrocortisone.
2. Maintain cerebral perfusion.
remifentanil infusion, intravenous lidocaine, or incorpo­rating dexmedetomedine in the anesthetic regimen.18 e hemodynamic responses associated with emergence should be rapidly treated with a short- acting agent such as esmolol and/ or nicardipine.
3. Ensure patient immobility to avoid inadvertent injury to
the internal carotid arter y or the cavernoussinus.
POSTOPERATIVE CONCERNS
Postoperative complications may occur immediately aer
4. Avoid inadvertent hypocapnia and hypothermia.
5. Facilitate early emergence for assessment of vision with
avoidance of coughing/ straining
pituitary tumor decompression or may be delayed. Early complications include CSF leak, hemorrhage, DI, and visual loss. Late complications include endocrine decits, electrolyte and water imbalance (SIADH), and infections.
Anesthetic Technique
CASE- BASED LEARNING DISCUSSION
In addition to the standard American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) monitors, an arterial line is also recommended to closely manage hemodynamics and con­tinue to evaluate and treat any electrolyte imbalances. Intravenous access with at least two large bore lines is essen­tial. Rapid sequence induction may be needed, because the patient may not be fasting and ICP may be raised. Following intubation, a throat pack is oen inserted to prevent the entry of blood and secretions into the stomach, which may cause postoperative vomiting. Both intravenous
1. Describe the important components of preoperative evaluation of a patient with pituitary apoplexy.
2. Aer uneventful induction of anesthesia, the surgeon topicalized the nasal mucosa with bupivacaine 0.25% and epinephrine 1:200,000. is led to hypertension with blood pressure of 180/ 110mmHg and a heart rate of 40 bpm. What is happening? How will you manage the situation?
and inhalational anesthetic agents may be used to achieve the anesthetic goals described above. Typically, short- acting anesthetic agents are selected, such as remifentanil and propofol, or a combination of remifentanil with inhaled anesthetics with low blood solubility, for example, sevo­urane or desurane. A prospective study comparing the combination of TIVA with remifentanil/ propofol to remi­fentanil/ sevourane showed no major dierences regarding hemodynamic stability, however recovery was signicantly
3. At the end of tumor resection a CSF leak is detected. e surgeon seals it with an abdominal fat gra and requests deep extubation. How will you emerge the patient? What techniques can be used for an awake, otherwise smooth extubation?
4. Eight hours postoperatively, you nd out that the patient’s urine output has been 300 mL/ hour, and he is hypotensive and tachycardic. How will you proceed?
longer with TIVA than with remifentanil/ sevourane.17 Hypotension should be rapidly treated, and normocapnia should be targeted. Inadvertent hyperventilation may result in loss of brain bulk and make any suprasellar extension of
REFERENCES
the tumor less accessible surgically. Electrolyte levels and urine output should be carefully monitored to diagnose diabetes insipidus(DI).
Emergence
Smooth emergence from anesthesia is particularly impor­tant because straining or coughing on the endotracheal tube may cause bleeding or dislodge a previously implanted fat gra and cause a CSF leak and potential infection.
1. Sharma D, Wright D. Cerebrovascular surgery. In: Mashour G,
Engelhard K, eds., Oxford Textbook of Perioperative Neuroscience and Neuroanaesthesia. 1st ed. Oxford University Press. (InPress)
2. Hunt WE, Hess RM. Surgical risk as related to time of intervention
in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1968;28:14– 20.
3. Report of World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Committee
on a Universal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Grading Scale. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1988;68:985– 6.
4. Fisher, CM, Kistler, JP, Davis, JM. Relation of cerebral vasospasm to
subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by CT scanning. Neurosurgery. 1980;6:1– 9.
NONTRAUMATIC INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE 461
462
https://t.me/medicina_free
5. Manninen PH, Ayra B, Gelb AW, etal. Association between elec­trocardiographic abnormalities and intracranial blood in patients following acute subarachnoid hemorrhage. Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology. 1995;7:12– 6.
6. Spetzler RF, Martin NA. A proposed grading system for arteriove­nous malformations. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1986;65:476– 83.
7. Boisseau N, Madany M, Staccini P, etal. Comparison of the eects of sevourane and propofol on cortical somatosensory evoked potentials. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2002;88:785– 9.
8. Sloan TB, Toleikis JR, Toleikis SC, etal. Intraoperative neurophysi­ological monitoring during spine surgery with total intravenous anesthesia or balanced anesthesia with 3% desurane. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing. 2015;29:77– 85.
9. Sharma D, Siriussawakul A, Dooney N, etal. Clinical experience with intraoperative jugular venous oximetry during pediatric intra­cranial neurosurgery. Pediatric Anaesthesia. 2013;23:84– 90.
10. Todd MM, Hindman BJ, Clarke WR, et al; Intraoperative Hypothermia for Aneurysm Surgery Trial (IHAST) Investigators. Mild intraoperative hypothermia during surgery for intracranial aneurysm. New England Journal of Medicine. 2005;352:135– 45.
11. Lee SH, Kwun BD, Kim JU, etal. Adenosine- induced transient asys­tole during intracranial aneurysm surgery:indications, dosing, e­cacy, and risks. Acta Neurochirurgica (Wien). 2015;157:1879– 86.
12. Bebawy JF, Gupta DK, Bendok BR, et al. Adenosine- induced ow arrest to facilitate intracranial aneurysm clip ligation: dose­response data and safety prole. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2010;110:1406– 11.
13. Spetzler RF, Wilson CB, Weinstein P, etal. Normal perfusion pres­sure breakthrough theory. Clinical Neurosurgery. 1978;25:651– 72.
14. Verrees M, Arafah BM, Selman WR. Pituitary tumor apo­plexy: characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. Neurosurgery Focus. 2004;16:E6.
15. Johnston PC, Hamrahian AH. Pituitary tumor apoplexy. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2015;22:939– 944.
16. Singh TD, Valizadeh N, Meyer FB, etal. Management and outcomes of pituitary apoplexy. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2015;122:1450– 7.
17. Caero T, Cavallo LM, Frangiosa A, et al. Clinical comparison of remifentanil– sevourane vs. remifentanil– propofol for endo­scopic endonasal transphenoidal surgery. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2007;24:441– 6.
18. G opalakrishna KN, Dash PK, Chatterjee N, eta l. Dexmedetomidine as an anesthetic adjuvant in patients undergoing transsphe­noidal resection of pituitary tumor. Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology. 2015;27:209– 15.
462 SECTION A. CEREBRAL ORIGIN
https://t.me/medicina_free
463
64.
ACUTESTROKE
Laurel E.Moore
CLINICALCASE
brillation is a major cause of embolic stroke and, given
our aging patient population, increasingly contributory to Patient PS is a 75- year- old woman with a history of well­controlled hypertension and paroxysmal atrial brillation scheduled for an elective hip replacement. General anesthe­sia is planned because of a past surgical history of extensive lumbar fusion surgery and patient preference.
stroke etiology.
In 1995 the NINDS trial3 supported the adminis­tration of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV rtPA) within 3 hours of stroke onset to reduce infarct size and improve patient outcomes. For the rst time, eective treatment for AIS was available. Trials over time have con-
INTRODUCTION
tinued to support the use of thrombolytic therapy for AIS, extending the window of eligibility for treatment from 3 to
4.5 hours in 2005,11 although FDA approval for this exten-
Stroke is the leading cause of disability in the United States,1 and in terms of mortality is second only to ischemic heart disease worldwide.2 Medical management for acute ische­mic stroke (AIS) has advanced from supportive care for decades to therapeutic care since 1995 with thrombolysis.3 In the past 3years, four major articles have been published in support of endovascular intervention for AIS,
4– 7
making this a central focus of this chapter. Other related topics for this chapter include the timing of elective surgery following stroke, how to assess perioperative risk for patients having a history of remote stroke, and implications for postopera­tive morbidity and mortality associated with perioperative stroke in noncardiac surgery.
8
sion is still lacking. ere are specic patient subsets, how­ever, for whom thrombolysis may have limited eectiveness. Patients with large- vessel or “proximal” arterial occlusion (Figure 64.1, 64.2, ) may be poorly responsive to rtPA due to the size and density of the occluding clot. ere are also patients for whom systemic thrombolysis may be contra­indicated, for example patients with catastrophic strokes beyond the window of eligibility (and at risk for hemor­rhagic conversion) or patients suering perioperative stroke placing them at risk for operative site hemorrhage. For these selected patients, mechanical thrombectomy may provide benet, although clear evidence for endovascular interven­tion for AIS was mixed until late 2014. Since then, four large randomized trials comparing mechanical retrieval with a
ACUTE ISCHEMICSTROKE
stent retriever device versus medical management have been published and strongly support endovascular intervention
for proximal vessel occlusion, typically in conjunction with Acute ischemic stroke is dened as the occlusion of arterial blood ow to a xed distribution of brain (Figures64.1, 64.2,). e phrase “Time is Brain!” is fre­quently used, as patients suering stroke lose up to 2mil­lion neurons per minute,9 and patient outcomes are clearly improved with early intervention.1 e central tenet for AIS management is that there is brain at risk for infarc­tion which is potentially salvageable with emergent inter­vention. Because most strokes are ischemic in origin,10 this subset is the topic of interest for this chapter. Atrial
4– 7
rtPA .
In an editorial discussing the signicance of these four trials, Grotta and Hacke12 summarized their ndings by concluding that endovascular intervention for AIS is a “potently” eective treatment for proximal vessel occlusion, particularly for patients undergoing thrombolytic therapy prior to intervention. ey further conclude that outcomes are improved when intervention is performed at a stroke center, when time to recanalization is minimized and when stent retriever devices are employed. Finally, they add that outcomes are improved when general anesthesia is avoided.
463
464
https://t.me/medicina_free
associated with GA during endovascular intervention is par­ticularly critical to patient outcome and, second, whether it is possible that GA is inherently neurotoxic and thus neg­atively aecting outcomes in patients with AIS. Neither of these questions can be answered at present, but it certainly seems reasonable to evaluate each patient independently and when CS is deemed safe, proceed with CS. Conscious sedation can consist of no sedative agents and simple verbal reassurance (as we frequently do at our institution) to low­dose propofol infusion. Box 64.1 lists considerations when making this determination for an individual patient. e determination of anesthetic technique based on individual patient factors is supported by the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care (SNACC) in their
Figure 64.1 Occlusion of middle cerebral artery. SOURCE: Courtesy of Dr. Aditya
Pandey, University of Michigan.
2014 consensus statement onAIS.
Evidence to guide the medical management of patients
13
during endovascular intervention is surprisingly limited.
is nal statement, compared to their other conclusions, is less clearly supported. While there is overwhelming evi­dence in the existing literature that patients receiving con­scious sedation (CS) during endovascular intervention for AIS have better outcomes than patients receiving general anesthesia (GA), all studies are signicantly weakened by selection bias (i.e., there are no studies controlled for pre­senting neurologic condition, and patients receiving GA are uniformly sicker), they are almost all small and retrospective, there are no studies controlling for blood pressure and other physiologic variables, and nally, practice patterns over time favor CS but interventional techniques and patient processes have also improved over time, further confusing any conclusions regarding CS superiority. Despite these weaknesses, given the sheer volume of studies supporting CS, it seems reasonable to ask, rst, whether hypotension
ere are recommendations such as those oered by the SNACC consensus statement,13 but hard evidence is lack­ing. One of the most important clinical determinations is at what level to maintain patient blood pressure during the periprocedural period. Arterial access is benecial in this setting, but whenever possible, placement of an arterial line should not delay groin puncture but occur simultaneously (or slave o of the sheath). If GA is required, the anesthe­sia team may appropriately choose to place an arterial line prior to induction of anesthesia for close hemodynamic control. As regards blood pressure goals, the relationship between patient blood pressure and survival is U- shaped,14 meaning those stroke patients presenting with severe hypertension or hypotension generally have worse out­comes. Given the upper limit of 185/ 105 mmHg to qualify for rtPA administration15 (and many patients undergoing endovascular therapy have received rtPA), these seem like reasonable upper limits. As for the lower acceptable limit for blood pressure, SNACC recommends maintaining systolic pressure above 140 mmHg13 in order to optimize collateral ow to the ischemic penumbra. Blood pressures below this level should be aggressively treated. Other man­agement goals include normoglycemia, normocapnia, and oxygen saturation greater than 92%.13 Although hypother­mia is neuroprotective for focal ischemia in animal mod­els,16 as yet there is no evidence in human trials to support hypothermia for AIS.
It is notable that between the years of 2008 and 2012 only 8% of hospitals treating stroke oered mechanical thrombectomy as a treatment option.17 Clearly, from a public health standpoint, we have work to do to facili-
Figure64.2 Successful endovascular recanalization for same patient as Figure
64.1. SOURCE:Cour tesy of Dr.Aditya Pandey, University of Michigan.
tate the rapid recognition and treatment of patients suf­fering AIS. Given the recent data strongly supporting
464 SECTION A. CEREBRAL ORIGIN
https://t.me/medicina_free
465
Furthermore, perioperative stroke has a two- to threefold
BOX 64.1 CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS FORDETERMINING
ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUE FORAIS INTERVENTION
greater mortality than strokes occurring in the nonopera­tive setting.19 While clinically evident stroke following noncardiac and nonneurosurgical procedures is rare with
Considerations inFavor ofGeneral Anesthesia
1. Procedure may be painful, and patients may react
unpredictably
an incidence of 1:1000, with ve or more patient risk fac­tors (see Box 64.2) this incidence becomes 2%,8 a strik­ing incidence for procedures considered to be “low risk.” Stroke in the perioperative setting is dicult to recognize
2. Patients with dominant MCA occlusion may be aphasic
and unable to cooperate with directions
3. Posterior circulation strokes may limit patient ability to
protectairway
4. Improved control of oxygenation and ventilation
clinically for many reasons including residual anesthetic
BOX 64.2 PERIOPERATIVE ASSOCIATIONS
WITHPERIOPERATIVESTROKE
Considerations inFavor ofConscious Sedation
1. Better cerebral perfusion pressure to ischemic brain and
collateral circulation
2. More rapid “door to clot”times
3. Real- time neurologic assessment
4. Patient comorbidities may place them at riskforGA
endovascular intervention for large- vessel occlusion, it seems reasonable to expect increasing volumes of patients presenting for emergent anesthetic management, particu­larly as the US population ages. Systematic problems for anesthesiologists include the fact that these patients are inherently sick with multiple medical comorbidities, they present with little to no medical information pertaining to their comorbidities, and they are truly emergent pro­cedures, severely limiting our ability to gather medical information. Given the unpredictable timing of stroke presentation, stang for these procedures also presents issues for anesthesiology departments at stroke centers performing endovascular intervention. Despite these issues, the fact that we can now oer eective therapy to improve outcomes in patients suering AIS is true prog­ress and provides hope for further improvements in out­come for this patient population.
Patient Comorbidities
1. Age
2. h/ o TIA orstroke
3. h/ o renal disease
4. Femalesex
5. Cardiac disease
6. Hypertension
7. Smoking
Representative Risk Based onSurgical Procedure
1. Noncardiac nonneurosurgical0.1%
2. Noncarotid vascular1%
3. Coronary arter y bypass2%– 4%
4. Double- triple valve replacements10%
Perioperative Events That May Be Associated withIncreased Risk ofPerioperativeStroke
1. Hypotension
2. Atrial brillation
3. Beta- blocker administration (particularly nonselective)
PERIOPERATIVESTROKE
Perioperative stroke, generally dened as stroke within 30days of surgery, is a devastating complication of surgery and anesthesia that is clearly associated with an increased risk for perioperative mortality and morbidity.
ACUTESTROKE 465
8,18
4. Anemia
5. General anesthesia (specic to total jointsonly)
6. Prothrombotic state associated with surgery
7. Anticoagulant or antiplatelet cessation
8. Statin cessation
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025