Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 911 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
8 Мб
Скачать
386
https://t.me/medicina_free
https://t.me/medicina_free
387
54.
DIFFICULT AIRWAY:SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS INPREGNANCY
Rania Elkhateb and Jill M.Mhyre
CLINICALCASE
laryngoscopy. Cephalad displacement of the diaphragm
decreases the functional residual capacity by 20% by the end A 32- year- old woman is transferred from the labor and deliv­ery triage unit to the obstetric operating room for umbilical cord prolapse. She has no previous surgical history, aller­gies, or medical problems, and received limited prenatal care. She has an estimated body mass index of 42 kg/ m2. e obstetricians request emergent delivery. Airway exam­ination reveals a Mallampati III view with normal mouth opening, thyromental distance, and neck mobility. She receives 15 mL of nonparticulate antacid in preparation for rapid sequence induction of general anesthesia.
of pregnancy, and can decline by another 25% when chang-
ing from sitting to supine position. Consequently, preoxy-
genation is less eective in establishing an oxygen reserve
prior to the onset of apnea. In addition, maternal oxygen
consumption increases 20% during pregnancy.3 Together
the decrease in oxygen reserve and the increase in oxygen
consumption markedly reduce the duration of apnea before
desaturation develops. Obesity further impedes preoxygen-
ation and accelerates apnea- induced desaturation,4 because
it reduces functional residual capacity, decreases chest wall
compliance, increases airway resistance, and increases in
MECHANISM OFDIFFICULT AIRWAY INOBSTETRIC PATIENTS
pulmonary vascular resistance.
Expanding circulating blood volume, decreased oncotic
pressure, and vascular congestion promote airway edema in
5
normal pregnancy. Preeclampsia, prolonged oxytocin infu­Dicult airway has been dened as “the clinical situation in which a conventionally trained anesthesiologist experi­ences diculty with facemask ventilation of the upper air­way, diculty with tracheal intubation, or both.”1 In most obstetric anesthetics, rapid sequence induction of general anesthesia with laryngoscopy is selected to facilitate imme­diate endotracheal intubation; however, a plan for facemask ventilation or supraglottic airway ventilation is always nec­essary. When initial attempts at laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation do fail, and ventilation is delayed or dicult, inadequate oxygen delivery to the maternal alveoli can rap­idly produce maternal hypoxemia, risking hypoxic injury in the mother, fetus, or both. Other serious complications of dicult airway management include aspiration of gastric contents, airway trauma, pulmonary edema, and undesired intraoperative awareness.
2
A number of anatomic and physiologic changes of pregnancy contribute to dicult intubation and airway management. Pregnancy- related weight gain and breast enlargement make patient positioning both more dicult and more important for both optimal preoxygenation and
sions, and volume resuscitation for postpartum hemorrhage can worsen airway edema.6 Edema combined with mucosal friability exacerbate the consequences of airway trauma, which can lead to both bleeding that obscures visualization and dicult ventilation.
Pregnancy is associated with increased intragastric pres­sure, incompetent lower esophageal sphincter tone, and, once labor begins, delayed gastric emptying, each of which increases the risk of aspiration. Progesterone, pain, fear, and exogenous oxytocin and opioids all impede gastric empty­ing. Even in the absence of these factors, the unpredictable nature of obstetric surgery means that patients frequently present within hours of having eaten. Rapid sequence induction with immediate tracheal intubation minimizes the risk of aspiration of gastric contents and the duration of apnea between induction of anesthesia and tracheal intu­bation. However, deploying this technique may instigate a reluctance to mask ventilate, even as the oxygen saturation begins to fall. Cricoid pressure may obscure the visualiza­tion of the airway, impair ventilation, and/ or add to the dif­culty of intubation.
387
388
Class I Class II Class III Class IV
https://t.me/medicina_free
In addition, environmental and clinical factors can inter­fere with optimal preparation and team performance. e emergent nature of many obstetric surgeries may compel shortcuts and inadequate preparation prior to anesthetic induction. As illustrated in the scenario at the beginning of this chapter, women with limited prenatal care may present with indications for immediate operative delivery, without time for a comprehensive anesthetic evaluation or prepara­tion. e increased use of neuraxial anesthesia, as opposed to general anesthesia in nonemergent obstetric cases, has dimin­ished experience for most providers in dealing with dicult obstetric airway management.7 Finally, the physical isolation of many obstetric surgical suites, and the high proportion of emergent cases that take place at night, mean that highly skilled assistance is less likely to be available when needed.
PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT FORDIFFICULTAIRWAY
Time for a thorough airway examination may not be pos­sible immediately prior to induction of general anesthe­sia in parturients, and even if completed, may not result in the opportunity to change management if insucient time is available to act on the ndings. As such, a suggested approach is to evaluate patients, including examination of the airway, at the time of admission to the labor and deliv­ery unit, and periodically as labor progresses, especially in women with risk factors for developing airway edema (e.g., preeclampsia, prolonged oxytocin infusion, and postpar­tum hemorrhage).
Risk factors for dicult intubation and dicult ven­tilation in pregnancy are similar to those in nonobstetric patients. Individual physical examination ndings do not
RISK OFDIFFICULT AIRWAY INOBSTETRIC PATIENTS
accurately predict dicult intubation11 so combining mul­tiple evaluation criteria may provide better discrimination than any single test. Recommended evaluation criteria such as the Mallampati classication (Figure 54.1), which
Meta- analysis suggests that failed intubation complicates
2.6 (95% CI 2.0 to 3.2) per 1,000 general anesthetics for obstetric surgery (1 out of every 390), when dened as the need to abandon endotracheal intubation aer failed direct laryngoscopy, or aer an alternative intubating technique, or both.8 In comparison, contemporary reports suggest that of every 1,000 nonobstetric general anesthetics, approxi­mately 1.5 (95% CI 1.2 to 1.8) cases experience failed intu­bation,9 and 1.3 (95% CI 1.2 to 1.5) cases experience failed intubation in the presence of dicult mask ventilation.
screens for visibility of the oropharyngeal structures, and other predictors are listed in Box54.1.
Pregnancy is a known risk factor for rapid oxygen desat­uration. Additional synergistic risk factors include mor­bid obesity (BMI > 39 kg/ m2), multiple gestation, active uterine contractions, and inadequate preoxygenation prior to the anesthetic induction (e.g., diculty maintaining a tight facemask seal).12 e combination of risk factors for dicult intubation and either dicult ventilation or rapid
10
oxygen desaturation is particularly ominous.
Regurgitation with pulmonary aspiration can also
ASSESSMENT OFTHE PATIENT
Careful preoperative airway examination should alert the anesthesiologist about the need to nd an alternative strat-
confound otherwise straightforward airway management. Gastric contents may be present even when a signicant amount of time has passed since the last oral intake, but a history of recent consumption of a large meal would cer­tainly indicate a full stomach.
egy to manage the airway.
Figure54.1 Mallampeti classication. SOURCE:Reprinted with permission from Samsoon GL, Young JR. Difcult tracheal intubation:a retrospective study. Anaesthesia.
1987;42:487– 90.
388 SECTION C. PULMONARY/AIRWAY CRISES
https://t.me/medicina_free
389
timely and periodic airway examination and those patients
BOX 54.1 ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS OFAIRWAY
ASSESSMENT
1. Physical examination for obesity, macromastia
34
with predictors of dicult airway management receive pro­phylactic interventions to reduce the need for general anes­thesia. As discussed above, these interventions may include early neuraxial labor analgesia, planned neuraxial anesthe-
2. Head and neck examination for facial edema, shortneck
3. Neck exion and atlanto- occipital extension
sia for surgery, or planned awake intubation techniques.
Despite meticulous preoperative evaluation and plan-
ning, unexpected airway diculty may arise during any
4. Mandibular space– thyromental distance
5. Mouth opening and ability to advance the mandible
(upper bitetest)
obstetric surgery. Timely and appropriate management is essential to avoid maternal or fetal harm, so the anesthesi­ologist must be prepared in every case with a preformulated airway management plan that will ensure the team is able to
6. Dentition— protruding maxillary incisors, missingteeth
7. Oropharyngeal structures— Mallampati classication
preserve oxygenation, regardless of the specic airway man­agement techniques or diculties encountered.
13
e airway algorithm should be simple, with logical pro­gression through management techniques, and ideally will be practiced in simulated scenarios. Anumber of airway man-
Usually obstetric airway examination ndings are either reassuring or equivocal. Occasionally, the airway examina­tion is suciently worrisome that communication with the patient and the obstetrician is appropriate to devise a deliv­ery plan that minimizes the likelihood of requiring rapid sequence induction of general anesthesia. Risks, benets, and alternatives for a variety of delivery scenarios should be explored, with decisions documented in the medical record. Rarely, the airway examination is so ominous that it excludes standard rapid sequence induction of general anesthesia as a safe option, and alternative airway management strategies must be identied; careful multidisciplinary patient- centered delivery and anesthetic planning is important in thesecases.
In cases of emergency obstetric surgery, a minimal air­way examination includes an impression of obesity, palpa­tion of submandibular space, inspection of the oropharynx and teeth, and the administration of a nonparticulate ant­acid, all completed rapidly just before applying facemask oxygen. e purpose if this rapid airway examination is to identify a patient with suciently ominous airway ndings to mandate a delay in the anesthetic induction in order to avoid airway management entirely (by establishing neurax­ial anesthesia), or to bring advanced airway equipment and to recruit additional experienced personnel to the bedside.
agement algorithms have been published As a general rule, most begin with rapid sequence induction of general anesthesia followed by immediate intubation. is approach minimizes the duration of apnea and an unpro­tected airway, and thereby achieves three objectives:(1)oxy­genation, (2)ventilation, and (3)protection from aspiration of gastric contents. However, when immediate intubation attempts fail, oxygenation must be prioritized above all other objectives. is oen entails rescue ventilation with 100% oxygen using a facemask or supraglottic airway.
To ensure prompt implementation of the airway man­agement algorithm in the event of an airway emergency, essential airway equipment should be veried as immedi­ately available and functioning prior to the induction of any obstetric anesthetic. Routine equipment verication should be completed at least daily, aer each use, and again, imme­diately before inducing any anesthetic, whether regional or general anesthesia. Examples of equipment needed for basic and complex airway management are listed in Boxes 54.2 and 54.3.
16
In preparation for rapid sequence induction of general anesthesia, eective preoxygenation is crucial. Acceptable preoxygenation can be provided by 3– 5 minutes of tidal volume breathing or eight deep breaths using 100% oxy-
13– 15
(Figure 54.2).
gen.17 irty- degree head elevation with the head extended in a sning position improves the functional residual
PROPHYLAXIS TOLIMIT THERISK OFDIFFICULT AIRWAY AND PREPARATION TOOPTIMIZE MANAGEMENT
capacity18 and laryngeal visualization. e ideal position aligns the external auditory meatus with the sternal notch. (Figure 54.3) Meanwhile, a wedge under the right hip, with or without 15 degree le table tilt, displaces the uterus
e foundation of dicult airway management in obstet­rics is a preventive approach in which all parturients receive
laterally leward to relieve aortocaval compression and to increase venous return to the rightheart.
DIFFICULTAIRWAY 389
390
https://t.me/medicina_free
Unanticipated Difficult Intubation in Obstetrics
Ventilated with
secure airway
Succeed
• Call for HELP
• Mask Ventilation
No additional muscle relaxant
Adjust patient position Adjust cricoid pressure
Alternative
Technique for
Intubation
Max 2 attempts or SpO
Failed
Mask Ventilation
Or
Laryngeal Mask Ventilation
2
<90
Failed
Failed
Can not Ventilate
Can Ventilate
Proceed with CS Surgical Airway
Figure54.2 Algorithm for unanticipated difcult airway.
Emergency
Clinical Judgment
No Emergency
Awaken Patient
Secure airway
e benet of cricoid pressure is controversial due to lack of scientic evidence to support or abandon its use; yet it is oen applied.
19,20
Cricoid pressure may obscure the laryngoscopic view if applied incorrectly, and may induce anxiety and/ or vomiting if applied before the patient is fully anesthetized. Cricoid pressure does not increase the risk of
dicult mask ventilation or intubation if it is applied by a trained clinician.21 If the glottic view is impaired, or if a supraglottic airway is inserted, the cricoid pressure can be adjusted or released. Pressure of no more than 10 N forces has been recommended as a guideline by the Dicult Airway Society when the patient is conscious; the pressure
390 SECTION C. PULMONARY/AIRWAY CRISES
https://t.me/medicina_free
391
to facilitate dicult direct laryngoscopy and intubation,
BOX 54.2 EQUIPMENT NEEDED FORINDUCTION
OFOBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA
Facemask and oral airways
15
including a bougie, McCoy blade, or a lighted or beroptic stylet. Many anesthesiologists now use videolaryngoscopy23 for either the primary intubation attempt or to rescue failed direct laryngoscopy.
Gauze and a tongueblade
2 working laryngoscope handles
e number of laryngoscopy attempts to achieve endo­tracheal intubation has been also debated, but a Canadian airway focus group in 1998 recommended only two
Macintosh blades:sizes 3and4
6.5 styletted endotracheal tube with an empty
10- mL syringe connected to the pilot balloon
attempts, unless there has not been any airway trauma and it is believed that success can be achieved with another attempt, in which case a third attempt is justied.
24,25
Multiple attempts increase the risk of airway edema and
Backup endotracheal tubes in a range ofsizes
Gum elasticbougie
trauma leading to a “can’t intubate, can’t ventilate” sce­nario. Once attempts have failed or the oxygen saturation cannot be maintained above 92% at any stage, then intuba-
Primary extraglottic airway appropriate for a 70- to 100- kg
person may include one or more of the following devices
Supraglottic airways with an esophageal drain and/ or
intubating capability preferred (e.g., LMA Supreme, igel,
LMA FasTrach)
Suction adequate to remove secretions
tion becomes secondary to the primary goal of maintain­ing adequate maternal and fetal oxygenation. In the event of failed intubation, additional help should be immediately requested.
Facemask ventilation is oen the initial technique used to maintain adequate oxygenation following failed intubation attempts. Two- handed mask ventilation with an oral airway can be achieved by a single provider by setting the ventilator to deliver pressure- control ventila-
can then be increased to 30 N when the patient has lost consciousness.
22
Direct laryngoscopy has been traditionally considered the gold standard technique for obstetric airway manage­ment. Macromastia can impede laryngoscopic blade inser­tion; strategies and equipment to facilitate successful blade insertion include a ramped patient position that elevates the thorax, a short laryngoscopic handle, and a polio Macintosh blade. In the event of a Cormack Lehane grade 3 or 4 view, a variety of adjunctive equipment may be used
tion.26 Nevertheless, a second person with advanced air­way management skills is essential at this stage to prepare equipment; manage anesthesia, hemodynamics, and the rest of the operative team; and to prevent xation errors. Alternatively, or subsequently to facemask ventilation, a properly sited supraglottic airway may be used to ventilate, oxygenate, and if necessary serve as a guide for endotracheal intubation.
27,28
At each stage of the algorithm, the second person should be preparing equipment for the next step. For example, if facemask ventilation fails, then while the supraglottic airway is inserted, the second clinician should
23
BOX 54.3 CONTENT OFPORTABLE STORAGE UNIT
FORDIFFICULT AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
1
prepare for a possible surgical airway.
CANNOT INTUBATE BUTCAN VENTILATE
Rigid laryngoscope blades of alternate design and
size from those routinely used; this may include a rigid
beroptic laryngoscope
Videolaryngoscope
Tracheal tubeguides
Flexible beroptic intubation equipment
Equipment suitable for emergency invasive airwayaccess
An exhaled carbon dioxide detector
DIFFICULTAIRWAY 391
If there is no immediate urgency then the patient should be awakened, aer which an alternative approach can be under­taken, such as regional anesthesia or awake intubation.
However, that is a rare situation in obstetric anesthesia. In the majority of cases, immediate surgery is essential to preserve the life or health of the mother or fetus or both; and such procedures can be completed under facemask29 or supraglottic airway ventilation.30 e decision to com­plete surgery with an unsecured airway depends on the acu­ity, the ease of ventilation, and the likelihood of signicant regurgitation and subsequent aspiration. Surgeons should
392
https://t.me/medicina_free
Figure 54.3 Proper patient position illustrated on the right.
be advised to employ a delivery technique that will mini­mize fundal pressure and expedite procedure completion.
deflated may be helpful. For individuals with high risk of difficult reintubation, a more conservative approach may include glottic examination using video laryngos-
CANNOT INTUBATE, CANNOT VENTILATE
If ventilation should fail at any point during the intuba­tion process, then immediate action should be taken to establish a means to deliver oxygen. Awakening a hypoxic and apneic patient is rarely an option, but minimal assisted
copy prior to extubation,33 extubation over a stylet or Cook catheter, or postoperative intubation for 24 hours or more. All patients who demonstrate a difficult airway should receive a letter from the anesthesiologist detail­ing the issue(s) and making recommendations for future
airway management. ventilation to preserve oxygenation may result in return of spontaneous ventilation, which should be supported, and serious consideration should be given to awakening the
KEYPOINTS
patient. If ventilation remains impossible, replacement of a supraglottic airway device can be attempted while a surgi­cal airway is secured.31 e anesthesiologist should at all times avoid the temptation to keep repeating certain steps or airway management techniques that have failed and instead should move to the next step in the airway algo­rithm withoutdelay.
Proper preoperative assessment and history taking detect potential risk factors.
Correct patient positioning and preoxygenation are essential to provide optimal conditions for intubation.
No more than two intubation attempts are allowed unless a third one is justied.
TRAINING AND PREPARATION
Expert dicult airway management requires not only technical prociency but also nontechnical skills in crisis resource management, team- work, leadership, and decision­making. e use of simulation provides opportunity to build skills in dicult airway management without com­promising patient safety, with demonstrated improvements in technical and nontechnical skills that last up to 1year.
32
Ventilation and oxygenation always takes priority over repeated attempts at intubation.
A good, well- rehearsed algorithm that is easy to follow is mandatory for dicult airway management.
Adequate documentation of the dicult airway in the patient record prevents serious airway crisis insubsequent anesthesia by taking adequate preparation.
FOLLOW- UP
Following difficult intubation, patients may have airway edema that increases risk of failed ventilation at the time of extubation. Before removal of the endotracheal tube, confirmation of a leak around it after the cuff has been
392 SECTION C. PULMONARY/AIRWAY CRISES
Poor maternal and neonatal outcome can be avoidedby:
Proper communication between the patient, anesthetist, and obstetrician.
Portable dicult airway cart available in the obstetric suite with the algorithm card attachedtoit.
https://t.me/medicina_free
393
Proper education and training; each anesthetist must be familiar and expert in using at least one of the equipment options available for dicult airway.
CASE- BASED LEARNING DISCUSSION
1. Describe the essential steps for preoperative assessment
under emergent circumstances. How do the results of each assessment step change anesthetic management?
2. Following rapid sequence induction of general
anesthesia, direct laryngoscopy revealed a Cormack Lehane Grade 3B view, and endotracheal intubation was not possible before the oxygen saturation declined below 90%. What should be the next course of action and why? What steps will optimize success during the second intubation attempt?
3. Despite optimal attempts at direct laryngoscopy and
videolaryngoscopy, endotracheal intubation is not successful, but mask ventilation is feasible. e cord prolapse persists, and the obstetrician is adamant with the plan to proceed with delivery. Under what circumstances might you awaken the patient or proceed with delivery, and how should the airway be managed if the team decides to proceed?
4. e infant is delivered under facemask ventilation, but
following delivery the uterus is atonic, the surgeons diagnose a lateral extension of their incision into the broad ligament, and blood loss rapidly accumulates. What is the best airway management strategy at this point? At what point is endotracheal intubation indicated, and how is it best accomplished?
5. What is your recommendation for future airway
management for this patient?
REFERENCES
1. Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, etal. Practice guidelines
for management of the dicult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Dicult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:251– 70.
2. Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C. Major complications of airway
management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Dicult Airway Society. Part1:anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2011;106:617– 31.
3. McAuley SE, Jensen D, McGrath MJ, Wolfe LA. Eects of human
pregnancy and aerobic conditioning on alveolar gas exchange dur­ing exercise. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. 2005;83:625– 33.
4. Jense HG, Dubin SA, Silverstein PI, O’Leary- Escolas U. Eect of obesity on safe duration of apnea in anesthetized humans. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1991;72:89– 93.
5. Adams JP, Murphy PG. Obesity in anaesthesia and intensive care. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2000;85:91– 108.
6. Brock- Utne JG, Downing JW, Seedat F. Laryngeal oedema associ­ated with pre- eclamptic toxaemia. Anaesthesia. 1977;32:556– 8.
7. Lipman S, Carvalho B, Brock- Utne J. e demise of general anes­thesia in obstetrics revisited:prescription for a cure. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. 2005;14:2– 4.
8. Kinsella SM, Winton AL, Mushambi MC. Failed tracheal intu­bation during obstetric general anaesthesia: a literature review. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. 2015;24(4):356– 74.
9. Lundstrom LH, Moller AM, Rosenstock C, Astrup G, Wetterslev J. High body mass index is a weak predictor for dicult and failed tracheal intubation: a cohort study of 91,332 consecutive patients scheduled for direct laryngoscopy registered in the Danish Anesthesia Database. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:266– 74.
10. Kheterpal S, Healy D, Aziz MF, etal. Incidence, predictors, and out­come of dicult mask ventilation combined with dicult laryngos­copy:a report from the multicenter perioperative outcomes group. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:1360– 9.
11. Shiga T, Wajima Z, Inoue T, Sakamoto A. Predicting dicult intu­bation in apparently normal patients: a meta- analysis of bedside screening test performance. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:429– 37.
12. McClelland SH, Bogod DG, Hardman JG. Pre- oxygenation and apnoea in pregnancy:changes during labour and with obstetric mor­bidity in a computational simulation. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:371– 7.
13. Combes X, Le Roux B, Suen P, etal. Unanticipated dicult airway in anesthetized patients:prospective validation of a management algorithm. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:1146– 50.
14. Balki M, Cooke ME, Dunington S, Salman A, Goldszmidt E. Unanticipated dicult airway in obstetric patients: development of a new algorithm for formative assessment in high- delity simula­tion. Anesthesiology. 2012;117:883– 97.
15. Mhyre JM, Healy D. e unanticipated dicult intubation in obstetrics. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2011;112:648– 52.
16. Joy L. Hawkins MDC, Denver, Colorado: Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2007;106:843– 63.
17. Tanoubi I, Drolet P, Donati F. Optimizing preoxygenation in adults. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2009;56:449– 66.
18. Hignett R, Fernando R, McGlennan A, etal. A randomized cross­over study to determine the eect of a 30 degrees head- up versus a supine position on the functional residual capacity of term parturi­ents. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2011;113:1098– 102.
19. Stewart JC, Bhananker S, Ramaiah R. Rapid- sequence intubation and cricoid pressure. International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science. 2014;4:42– 9.
20. Bhatia N, Bhagat H, Sen I. Cricoid pressure: Where do we stand? Journal of Anaesthesiology and Clinical Pharmacology. 2014;30:3– 6.
21. Turgeon AF, Nicole PC, Trepanier CA, Marcoux S, Lessard MR. Cricoid pressure does not increase the rate of failed intubation by direct laryngoscopy in adults. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:315– 9.
22. Henderson JJ, Popat MT, Latto IP, Pearce AC. Dicult Airway Society guidelines for management of the unanticipated dicult intubation. Anaesthesia. 2004;59:675– 94.
23. Law JA, Broemling N, Cooper RM, etal. e dicult airway with recommendations for management:part1. Dicult tracheal intu­bation encountered in an unconscious/ induced patient. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2013;60:1089– 118.
24. Law JA, Broemling N, Cooper RM, etal. e dicult airway with recommendations for management:part2. e anticipated dicult airway. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2013;60:1119– 38.
DIFFICULTAIRWAY 393
394
https://t.me/medicina_free
25. Crosby ET, Cooper RM, Douglas MJ, etal. e unanticipated di­cult airway with recommendations for management. Can J Anaesth. 1998;45:757– 76.
26. Munnur U, de Boisblanc B, Suresh MS. Airway problems in preg­nancy. Critical Care Medicine. 2005;33:S259– 68.
27. Gruenbaum SE, Gruenbaum BF, Tsaregorodtsev S, Dubilet M, Melamed I, Zlotnik A. Novel use of an exchange catheter to facili­tate intubation with an Aintree catheter in a tall patient with a predicted dicult airway: a case report. Journal of Medical Case Reports. 2012;6:108.
28. Suresh MS. Intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA):a life saving rescue device following failed tracheal intubation during cesarean section (CS). Anesthesiology. 2004;100:75,A135.
29. Hawthorne L, Wilson R, Lyons G, Dresner M. Failed intubation revisited: 17- yr experience in a teaching maternity unit. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 1996;76:680– 4.
30. Minville V, N’Guyen L, Coustet B, Fourcade O, Samii K. Dicult airway in obstetric using Ilma- Fastrach. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2004;99:1873.
31. Heard AM, Green RJ, Eakins P. e formulation and introduction of a “can’t intubate, can’t ventilate” algorithm into clinical practice. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:601– 8.
32. Boet S, Borges BC, Naik VN, etal. Complex procedural skills are retained for a minimum of 1 yr aer a single high- delity simulation training session. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2011;107:533– 9.
33. Mort TC, Braett BH. Conventional versus video laryngoscopy for tracheal tube exchange:glottic visualization, success rates, complica­tions, and rescue alternatives in the high- risk dicult airway patient. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2015;121:440– 8.
34. Vasdev GM, Harrison BA, Keegan MT, Burkle CM. Management of the dicult and failed airway in obstetric anesthesia. Journal of Anesthesia. 2008;22:38– 48.
394 SECTION C. PULMONARY/AIRWAY CRISES
https://t.me/medicina_free
395
55.
ASTHMA AND PREGNANCY
Grant C.Lynde
CLINICALCASE
prevalence of the disease, changing trends in both how
asthma is dened and diagnosed, or increased recognition A 26- year- old G2P1001 at 34 weeks with a history of asthma presents to labor and delivery with severe shortness of breath. She describes having a recent cold and has been using her albuterol inhaler with increasing frequency in the past week. She denies a history of hospitalization or emer­gency department visits for her asthma. e patient’s respi­ratory rate is 24, and her room air saturation is 93% with
of the need to treat patients who present with asthma- like
symptoms. Asthma can result in low birth weight, preterm
delivery, and worsening asthma in the mother. Women who
have an acute exacerbation of asthma during pregnancy are
at signicantly higher risk of poor outcome.2 Other comor-
bidities, such as sleep apnea and morbid obesity, also appear
to occur with greater frequency in asthmatic patients.
6– 8
audible wheezing. Following treatment with 2.5 mg/ hr nebulized albuterol administered continuously for 1 hour, the patient’s respiratory rate decreased to 16, her room air saturation rose to 97%, and her subjective symptoms were reduced. e patient was discharged from the emergency department with a prescription for prednisone, 40 mg for 5days followed by a 5- day taper, inhaled budesonide (180 mcg, 2 pus twice a day), a peak expiratory ow meter, and instructions to check and record her levels daily, and an appointment to visit her OB/ GYN later thatweek.
MECHANISM
Asthma is an obstructive lung disease characterized by bron-
chial hyperresponsiveness, bronchoconstriction, and airway
edema. e inammatory process can result in remodeling
of airways and can also result in chronic changes in airway
structure. While the exact mechanism by which asthma
develops is not fully understood, it is believed that patient-
specic factors interplay with environmental factors,
resulting in an inadequate activation of immune control
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OFDISEASESTATE
e progression of asthma during pregnancy is highly var­iable. us, a thorough understanding of the epidemoiol­ogy, mechanism of disease, key factors in diagnosis, and proper steps of treatment are essential for optimal care of the mother andfetus.
BACKGROUND
mechanism involving T helper cells type 2.9 e “hygiene
hypothesis” proposes that reduced exposure to infectious
disease, improved sanitation, and increased use of antibiot-
ics has resulted in an imbalance of T helper cells type 1 and
2, resulting in the increase in asthma incidence seen since
9,10
1960.
Indoor allergen exposures, including dust mites, mold, household pets, and German cockroaches, demon­strate a high correlation with the development of asthma symptoms.
11– 14
Asthma appears to have a genetic compo­nent, accounting for both the inheritable nature of the dis­ease as well as the various disease phenotypes that exist.
10
Improvement in symptoms can be seen in 18%– 34% of patients, while worsening of symptoms can be seen in 20%– 42% of patients.
1– 3
Asthma is one of the most common and one of the most serious coexisting diseases during pregnancy. While older estimates of asthma’s prevalence were approx­imately 1% in pregnancy, more recent studies have sug­gested the prevalence in the United States is closer to 7%.
4,5
Reasons for this discrepancy may be related to increasing
DIAGNOSIS
e average age of adult- onset asthma in women is approx­imately 34years, however patients may develop the disease during early childhood.15 As a result, most parturients with asthma will be diagnosed prior to pregnancy. Typical symp­toms of asthma include wheezing , chest tightness, cough, and
395
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025