Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 911 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
8 Мб
Скачать
446
https://t.me/medicina_free
between services. Excessive hyperventilation can easily worsen cerebral ischemia or contribute to tearing of bridging veins after evacuation of an intracranial hema­toma. Review of the neurological exam and any imaging of an acute intracranial process should be performed so that the anesthesiologist can assess the degree of injury, midline shift, hematoma size, location of the injury, and potential for associated cervical spine injuries in the case of trauma. Quick and efficient collection of this informa­tion and any pertinent past medical history, medications, vital signs, and laboratory values is crucial to successful treatment. These details will help the anesthesiologist determine the need for a general anesthetic versus moni­tored anesthesia care, the need for cervical spine precau­tions during intubation and positioning, the likelihood of intraoperative hemodynamic problems, selection of appropriate vasoactive medications and the need for direct arterial blood pressure monitoring, and the like­lihood of large fluid shifts, coagulopathy, and need for transfusion, which will guide selection of appropriate intravenous access. Unless adequate peripheral venous access is impossible to obtain, central venous catheters are not typically used for these cases, as the additional delay can contribute to significantly poorer neurologic outcomes.
Diagnosis of an acute intracranial event is particularly challenging to the anesthesia team intraoperatively and postoperatively because of the many anesthesia medica­tions that can aect the mental status and cardiovascular and respiratory systems. In addition, acute illnesses such as sepsis or liver failure can alter the mental status. Knowledge of the baseline mental status and motor exam coupled with the ability to perform a quick gross neurological exam with pupillary light reexes and a Glasgow Coma Scale assessment for speech, motor, and orientation will guide the primary workup. Prior medical history is also criti­cal information to know, as patients who have recovered strength aer a stroke may exhibit transient weakness of the same limb(s) in the immediate postoperative period aer a general anesthetic. New focal decits such as a facial droop, unilateral weakness, or expressive aphasia, particularly aer nonneurosurgical procedures, are especially concerning for an acute stroke.
is section discusses some of the more common or more critical acute neurologic events that an anesthesi­ologist may encounter throughout the hospital and that should be part of the dierential diagnosis for acute neu­rologic changes. Each chapter presents a specic diagnosis, its pathophysiology, and the appropriate approach to treat­ment of that disorder.
446 PART VII. NEUROLOGICCRISES
https://t.me/medicina_free
447
SECTIONA
CEREBRALORIGIN
448
https://t.me/medicina_free
https://t.me/medicina_free
449
62.
DELIRIUM
Bret D. Alvis and Christopher G.Hughes
CLINICALCASE
specically in surgical patients focusing on delirium in
the rst few postoperative days have found similar results, A 77- year- old male with a history of hypertension and dementia presents for emergent repair of his unstable pelvic fracture. He has a past surgical history of coronary artery
including associations with increased length of stay, higher
cost of care, prolonged cognitive impairment, and increased
mortality.
5,12,13
bypass graing (CABG) 10years prior without anesthetic complications. Initial plan is to perform a rapid sequence intubation and general endotracheal tube anesthetic.
BACKGROUND
DEFINITION
e clinical syndrome of delirium consists of inattention,
disorganized thinking, disorientation, and/ or altered lev-
els of consciousness.14 While no consensus denitions Delirium occurs when a patient experiences uctuations in mental status caused by acute cerebral dysfunction. All hospitalized patients are at risk for the development of delirium, with a reported incidence of 11%– 25% in elderly patients and as high as 80% in the critically ill.
1,2
Patients in the perioperative setting are no exception, and the risk of developing postoperative delirium appears dependent on age, preexisting comorbid conditions, severity of con­current illness, and the severity of the surgical process. Because of a lack of clearly dened distinction between emergence and postoperative delirium, however, there is a wide discrepancy in the literature regarding the actual rates of delirium aer surgery.3 Up to 45% of patients will expe­rience delirium symptoms in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) aer surgery, many of whose symptoms persist at PACU discharge, which predicts further brain dysfunction during the hospitalization.
4– 6
Postoperative delirium in the ward or intensive care unit (ICU) has been reported to occur in up to 50% of patients aer both cardiac and non­cardiac surgery, and it typically develops within the rst to second day of admission.
7
Delirium in the hospital is independently associated with signicant morbidity and mortality, such that as the duration of delirium increases, a patient is at higher risk for cognitive and executive dysfunction at 3 and 12 months and for decreased short- and long- term survival.
8– 11
Studies
exist, emergence delirium typically refers to agitation aer discontinuation of an inhaled anesthetic, PACU delir­ium refers to delirium occurring aer emergence but dur­ing the initial recovery phase, and postoperative delirium refers to delirium that occurs aer the patient meets PACU discharge criteria or has been discharged from the PACU. Manifestations of delirium always include uctuations in mental status and can present with a wide spectrum of
1,3
symptoms that can include, but are not limited to, sleep disturbances, abnormal psychomotor activity, acute psy­chosis, decreased psychomotor activity, hallucinations, and emotional disturbances such as fear, depression, and/ or anxiety.
14,15
is syndrome of brain dysfunction can be categorized into three motoric subtypes: hyperactive, hypoactive, or mixed. Hyperactive delirium is least common; however, it is the most common perception of delirium to clinicians. Patients with hyperactive delirium display prominent agi­tated motor behaviors that can be witnessed easily. e most common form is hypoactive delirium, and it is the most dif­cult to diagnose, typically requiring validated delirium­assessment tools to diagnose.15 Hypoactive delirium is characterized by slow patient movements, decreased speed of cognition, and decreased alertness, and this motor sub­type may be associated with worse outcomes.18 Patients are oen overlooked, however, because they are not displaying
16,17
449
450
https://t.me/medicina_free
the disruptive behaviors that frequently trigger delirium in the dierential diagnosis.
DIAGNOSIS
18
ere are validated instruments that allow clinicians to assess a patient’s level of arousal and content of consciousness even when a patient is mechanically ventilated. e Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) (Table 62.1) and the Riker Sedation Agitation Scale (SAS) are commonly used tools that can be used to assess level of arousal.
19,20
Importantly, assessment for delirium cannot occur if the patient is deemed unresponsive by the sedation scales (RASS - 4 or - 5 or SAS of 1 to 2). Once a patient can respond to verbal stimuli, they
TABLE62.2 CONFUSION ASSESSMENT METHOD(CAM)
Diagnosis— requires BOTH A& B along with EITHER feature C or D
(A) Acute onset or Fluctuating course
(B) Inattention * Does the patient:
(C) Disorganized thinking
* Acute change in mental status from
baseline?
* Does this abnormal behavior:
1. Fluctuate overtime?
2. Come andgo?
3. Increase/ decrease in severity?
1. Have difculty focusing?
2. Become easily distracted?
3. Having difculty keeping track of what is said?
* Patient’s thinking:
1. Disorganized
2. Incoherent
can be assessed using tools such as the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM),21 the 4AT,22 the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit (CAM- ICU),23 or the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC).24 e CAM assessment includes an evaluation of the patient for the key features of delirium such as an acute onset, uctu­ating course, and inattention (Table 62.2).21 e 4AT is a brief
(D) Altered level of consciousness
SOURCE:Adapted from Inouye etal.
* Is the patient:
1. Alert
2. Vigilant
3. Lethargic
4. Stuporous
5. Comatose
21
TABLE62.1 RICHMOND AGITATION SEDATION
SCALE(RASS)
Score
+4 Combative Combative, violent, immediate danger
+3 Very Agitated Pulls or removes tube(s) or
+2 Agitated Frequent or nonpurposeful movements,
+1 Restless Anxious but movements not
0 Alert and Calm
- 1 Drowsy Not fully aler t, but has sustained
- 2 Light Sedation Briey awakens with eye contact to
- 3 Moderate
- 4 Deep Sedation No response to voice, but movement
- 5 Unarousable No response to voice or physical
SOURCE:Adapted from Sessler etal.
Terminology
Sedation
Clinical Description
to staff
catheters(s)— aggressive
ghts ventilator
aggressive/ vigorous
awakening (eye opening/ contact) to voice (>10 seconds)
voice (<10 seconds)
Movement or eye opening to voice (but no eye contact)
or eye opening to physical stimulation
stimulation
19
tool that assesses alertness, orientation, attention, and change in mental status.22 If the patient is critically ill or mechani­cally ventilated, the CAM- ICU and ICDSC scales are the most validated. e CAM- ICU assess the same four features as the CAM examination in a more abbreviated manner to t the needs of ICU patients— acute changes/ uctuations in mental status, inattention, disorganized thinking, and an altered level of consciousness.23 e ICDSC uses eight diag­nostic features to make the diagnosis of delirium, for which the patient needs only four of those features.
24
e immediate postoperative setting, especially the PACU, requires additional attention, because the diagnosis of delirium can be very challenging, as emergence from gen­eral anesthesia oen presents with signs similar to delirium. A recent study found that signs of delirium were highest upon arrival to the PACU (>30%) and decreased over time; however, 4% of patients still had persistent signs of delirium at time of PACU discharge despite meeting discharge cri­teria.2 Another study of high- risk elderly patients found PACU delirium rates of 45% even aer patients met PACU discharge criteria.4 Unfortunately, no specic delirium assessment tool has been validated in the PACU. Neither the CAM- ICU nor the Nursing Delirium Symptom Checklist (NuDESC) was very sensitive in the PACU in one study, but specicity was >90%;4 thus, patients testing positive with these assessment tools are highly likely to have delirium, but a few patients may be missed. When one considers that
450 SECTION A. CEREBRAL ORIGIN
https://t.me/medicina_free
451
over 230million surgical cases occur per year worldwide, it is easy to conclude that there are likely a substantial number of patients who leave the PACU with altered brain function and are at risk for persistent delirium.
ETIOLOGY
2
ere are many proposed mechanisms for the development
TABLE62.4 PERIOPERATIVE RISK FACTORS FORDELIRIUM
Surgery Anesthesia
Major abdominal ASA >3 Classication
Cardiac Benzodiazepine premedication
Emergency vs. elective General anesthesia?
Open vs. endovascular Deeper sedation?
Increased duration Opioid administration?
of delirium. Systemic and central nervous system inam­mation, cholinergic deciency, and disturbances in neu­rotransmitters such as serotonin and norepinephrine are a few of the proposed mechanisms.25 Studies have shown that there are neuroanatomical changes, including brain atrophy and white matter changes, in patients with delirium.
26,27
e white matter changes persist even aer hospital discharge and may be the cause of long- term cognitive impairment in these patients.
25
It is important for clinicians to understand the risk factors and precipitants for delirium in order to prevent it from occurring. e most common medical conditions that precipitate delirium in hospitalized patients are infec­tions of the urinary tract and the lungs.3 ese two etiolo­gies alone may be present in 34%– 64% of the hospitalized patients with delirium.3 Other etiologies include dehydra­tion, electrolyte abnormalities, acute kidney injury or liver failure, ethanol or benzodiazepine withdrawal, central ner­vous system insults, and seizures (Table 62.3). Congestive heart failure and acute myocardial infarction have also been implicated as delirium precipitants.3 A recent systematic review of risk factors identied age, dementia, hyperten­sion, coma, delirium on the previous day, emergency sur­gery, mechanical ventilations, polytrauma, and metabolic
acidosis as having the strongest evidence as delirium risk factors.28 Along with risk factors, precipitants of delirium include physical restraints, bladder catheters, polyphar­macy, sleep disturbances, and medications with anticho­linergic properties. Despite this list of common etiologies, there are plenty of patients who develop delirium in the hospital where no obvious etiological agents can befound.
e incidence and risk factors of postoperative delirium reported in the literature appear to be strongly inuenced by the severity of the surgical insult, comorbidities, and sedative and/ or analgesic drug exposure (Table 62.4).3 e risk cor­relates with the type of operation:otolaryngological (12%), general surgery (13%), aortic (29%), major abdominal (50%), and cardiac (up to 51%).3 Furthermore, increased surgical duration, emergency surgery, and open (versus endovascular) surgery also appear to increase risk.3 Along with the type of surgery, other reported risk factors for postoperative delirium include increasing age, preexisting cognitive impairment, increased cardiovascular comorbidities (including diabetes), and severity of illness (American Society of Anesthesiologists classications >3).3 Benzodiazepine administration in the perioperative setting has been strongly associated with emergence and postoperative delirium, similar to studies of
29– 34
Opioid adminis-
TABLE62.3 DELIRIUM RISK FACTORS AND PRECIPITANTS
Risk Factors Precipitants
mechanically ventilated ICU patients. tration has been associated with delirium in the postopera­tive and ICU settings;
2,35,36
however, data on this association
is inconsistent, as others have shown opioids to be protective,
Increasing age Infection
Preexisting cognitive impairment Dehydration
when used to appropriately control pain, or to have no asso­ciation with delirium.
37– 39
Hypertension Electrolyte abnormalities
Congestive heart failure Acute kidney failure
Acute myocardial infarction Acute liver failure
Mechanical ventilation Ethanol/ drug withdrawal
Polytrauma Fragmented sleep
Metabolic acidosis Central ner vous system insults
Existing coma/ delirium Benzodiazepines
DELIRIUM 451
EVALUATION
Once a patient is suspected of suering from delirium, they should be evaluated with a thorough history and physi­cal examination. e history can help a clinician identify possible targets for intervention such as drug ingestions, alcohol/ drug withdrawal, and metabolic derangements. Importantly, it may help dierentiate between dementia
452
https://t.me/medicina_free
or baseline cognitive impairment and new- onset delirium. e examination should evaluate possible sources of infec­tion and volume status.
Potentially indicated testing includes electrolyte panel, complete blood count, liver function tests, thyroid func­tion tests, electrocardiogram, infection work- up including chest radiograph, urinalysis, and culture data. Hypoxemia and hypercarbia should also be excluded, especially in the PACU and postoperative setting.
patient’s environment.44 Sleep hygiene and patient reori­entation should be performed for all patients to prevent delirium.44 Other environmental factors include removal of catheters/ restraints, nonpharmacologic sleep protocols, early mobilization, providing regular stimulating activities, and attention to hydration.44 Always ensure patient safety while removing any unnecessary medical devices and phar­macologic therapies.
Specic pharmacological agents are not supported by
denitive guidelines or evidence to support their use as
TREATMENT
therapies for delirium.7 Popular pharmacologic treatments used by clinicians include dexmedetomidine and/ or an
antipsychotic medication such as haloperidol, olanzapine, e Benjamin Franklin adage “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure” is apropos with regard to delirium, as no denitive therapy has been proven. e rst thing a clinician should attempt to do is modify the several risk factors for delirium by improving sleep hygiene, provid­ing appropriate pain control, executing appropriate seda­tive regimens, and avoiding medications that might trigger delirium (Table 62.5).40 ese medications include benzo­diazepines, anticholinergics, and sedating agents. Aer the history and examination, a clinician should promptly treat any causes identied— metabolic derangements, infections, hypoxemia, hypercarbia, and soforth.
Symptom management is important but can prove challenging.41 e critical care literature supports a sys­tematic approach to pain, agitation, and delirium manage­ment in their recent guidelines.1 is includes focusing on the ABCDEs:(A) assess, prevent, and manage pain; (B) both spontaneous awakening trials and spontane­ous breathing trials; (C)choice of sedation; (D)delirium monitoring and management; and (E) early mobility and exercise.15 Sedation protocols and early physical and occupational therapy have been shown to reduce delir-
42,43
ium.
Another treatment category is optimization of the
or quetiapine (Table 62.5).41 e Maximizing Ecacy of Targeted Sedation and Reducing Neurological Dysfunction (MENDS) trial compared lorazepam and dexmedetomi­dine for sedation in critically ill patients, and patients who received dexmedetomidine for sedation had more days free of delirium.33 e Safety and Ecacy of Dexmedetomidine Compared with Midazolam (SEDCOM) trial showed that dexmedetomidine patients experienced fewer episodes of delirium.
34
Antipsychotics have also been looked at for the treat­ment and/ or prevention of delirium. e Modifying the Incidence of Delirium (MIND) study compared zipra­sidone with haloperidol and placebo and found no dif­ference in delirium outcomes.45 uetiapine has been compared to placebo in a small trial of critically ill patients with delirium, with both patient groups receiving haloperi­dol as a rescue medication.46 e quetiapine arm did show a decrease in number of hours to resolution of the delir­ium symptoms and a reduction in the amount of rescue medications required.46 When comparing dexmedetomi­dine to haloperidol in hyperactive delirium, mechanically ventilated patients showed earlier time to extubation and shorter ICU length of stay in the dexmedetomidine arm.47 Haloperidol for delirium prophylaxis in the ICU has not been shown to be eective in reducing delirium incidence
TABLE62.5 DELIRIUM PREVENTION AND TREATMENT
OPTIONS
Pharmacological Environment Optimization
Dexmedetomidine Sleep hygiene
Haloperidol? Patient reorientation
Quetiapine? Remove catheters/ restraints
Olanzapine? Early mobilization
Risperidone? Appropriate hydration
Statins? Sedation protocol
and may lead to more oversedation.48 Risperidone has been evaluated in one randomized controlled trial, where a single dose given sublingually aer cardiac surgery was more eective than placebo in prevention of delirium.41 Statin therapy has shown some promise in delirium sec­ondary to pleiotropic anti- inammatory properties, tar­geting a diminished neuroinammation.49 ere is also evidence that statin use can reduce the risk of delirium in the ICU
27,48
and that withdrawal of statin therapy in prior users greatly increases the risk of delirium.27 Prior evi­dence has shown that high levels of anticholinergic activ­ity and decits in cholinergic function are associated with
452 SECTION A. CEREBRAL ORIGIN
https://t.me/medicina_free
453
delirium, but prophylactic rivastigmine (a cholinesterase inhibitor) has been shown to be ineective in reducing delirium aer cardiac surgery and in the ICU and may have increased mortality in the ICU.
50– 53
reduce delirium, however, is less compelling than the evi­dence that adequate pain control reduces delirium.61 Astudy of femoral nerve blockade in addition to patient- controlled analgesia demonstrated a lower incidence of postoperative delirium aer total knee replacement.65 Asmall randomized
ANESTHETIC CONSIDERATIONS
controlled trial in patients having spine surgery compared prophylactic gabapentin to placebo and found that gaba-
pentin reduced delirium.66 A fast- track surgery model for With regard to anesthetic management and risk of delirium, studies have demonstrated that benzodiazepine administra­tion is associated with emergence and postoperative delir-
54– 57
ium.
In the postoperative cardiac surgery patient, there has been promising research showing a decrease in delirium rates when patients are sedated with dexmedetomidine
knee and hip arthroplasty found minimal delirium when the nonopioid medications gabapentin, acetaminophen, and celecoxib were primarily used for pain management.67 Finally, a recently published study found that only approxi­mately 3% of patients developed delirium aer an enhanced recovery fast- track model for colonic surgery.
68
versus propofol or midazolam58 and decreased delirium duration with dexmedetomidine sedation versus morphine­based sedation.59 Existing data is not clear regarding the
CASE- BASED LEARNING DISCUSSION
association between analgesics and postoperative delirium despite studies examining variable opioid types, routes, and patient populations.
3
e evidence is inconclusive regarding the eects of anesthesia type or depth of anesthesia on the development of postoperative delirium. When a total intravenous propo­fol general anesthetic was performed and compared to des­urane, there was no dierence in postoperative delirium rates.60 ere have been two low- quality randomized clini­cal trials with high risk of bias that found a lower incidence of delirium in patients who received regional anesthesia for lower- extremity surgeries,61 and a Cochrane review did suggest that regional anesthesia may decrease postopera­tive confusion in hip surgery patients.62 Alarge prospective study of elderly hip surgery patients, however, did not nd an increased risk of postoperative delirium with general anesthesia versus regional anesthesia, and a neither did a more recent meta- analysis.63 Spinal anesthesia with lighter sedation versus deeper sedation for hip surgery has been studied in elderly patients and did show a decrease in the incidence of postoperative delirium in patients receiving lighter sedation.
64
1. Is the anesthetic plan acceptable? Would you change to a spinal anesthetic technique with low- dose sedation? What is your analgesic plan if using general anesthesia? What is your analgesic plan if using spinal anesthesia?
2. e case goes without any complications under general anesthesia with an endotracheal tube. What are the patient’s risk factors for postoperative delirium? What would you be looking for in the PACU to make the diagnosis? Is there anything you would do to try and prevent postoperative delirium?
3. e patient wakes up and is unable to follow commands to verbal stimuli. What validated tools can you use to help you make a delirium diagnosis? ese tools are used, and it is deemed that this patient is experiencing postoperative delirium. What can you do to treat this diagnosis?
4. e patient starts to pick at his IV and is tachypneic and tachycardic. Can this be secondary to his delirium? What would be your treatment plan? Should you inform the surgeons of this diagnosis and his condition?
Despite these limitations, the clinical guidelines for postoperative delirium prevention in the elderly state that regional anesthesia can improve pain control and help pre-
REFERENCES
vent delirium in older adults because of better pain control.61 It is recommended that healthcare professionals should optimize postoperative pain control, preferably with nono­pioid pain medications to minimize pain, in older adults to prevent delirium, for there is strong evidence to support the hypothesis that adequate postoperative analgesia is associ­ated with decreased delirium. e evidence for prescribing nonopioid alternatives to manage postoperative pain to
1. Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, etal. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Critical Care Medicine. 2013;41:263– 306.
2. Card E, Pandharipande P, Tomes C, etal. Emergence from general anaesthesia and evolution of delirium signs in the post- anaesthesia care unit. British Journal of Anaesthesia.2014.
3. Vasilevskis EE, Han JH, Hughes CG, Ely EW. Epidemiology and risk factors for delirium across hospital settings. Best Practice and Research Clinical Anaesthesiology. 2012;26:277– 87.
DELIRIUM 453
454
https://t.me/medicina_free
4. Neufeld KJ, Leoutsakos JS, Sieber FE, et al. Evaluation of two delirium screening tools for detecting post- operative delirium in the elderly. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2013;111:612– 8.
5. Sharma PT, Sieber FE, Zakriya KJ, etal. Recovery room delirium predicts postoperative delirium aer hip- fracture repair. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2005;101:1215– 20, table of contents.
6. Neufeld KJ, Leoutsakos JM, Sieber FE, etal. Outcomes of early delirium diagnosis aer general anesthesia in the elderly. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2013;117:471– 8.
7. Mu JL, Lee A, Joynt GM. Pharmacologic agents for the preven­tion and treatment of delirium in patients undergoing cardiac sur­gery:systematic review and metaanalysis. Critical Care Medicine. 2015;43:194– 204.
8. Pandharipande PP, Girard TD, Jackson JC, etal. Long- term cog­nitive impairment aer critical illness. New England Journal of Medicine. 2013;369:1306– 16.
9. Ely EW, Shintani A, Truman B, etal. Delirium as a predictor of mor­tality in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2004;291:1753– 62.
10. Pisani MA, Kong SY, Kasl SV, Murphy TE, Araujo KL, Van Ness PH. Days of delirium are associated with 1- year mortality in an older intensive care unit population. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2009;180:1092– 7.
11. Witlox J, Eurelings LS, de Jonghe JF, Kalisvaart KJ, Eikelenboom P, van Gool WA. Delirium in elderly patients and the risk of postdis­charge mortality, institutionalization, and dementia:a meta- analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2010;304:443– 51.
12. Saczynski JS, Marcantonio ER, uach L, etal. Cognitive trajecto­ries aer postoperative delirium. New England Journal of Medicine. 2012;367:30– 9.
13. Franco K, Litaker D, Locala J, Bronson D. e cost of delirium in the surgical patient. Psychosomatics. 2001;42:68– 73.
14. Sampson EL, Raven PR, Ndhlovu PN, etal. A randomized, double­blind, placebo- controlled trial donepezil hydrochloride (Aricept) for reducing the incidence of postoperative delirium aer elective total hip replacement. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2007;22:343– 9.
15. Norman BC, Hughes CG. Sedative agents and prophylaxis in ICU delirium. Current Anesthesiology Reports. 2015;5:33– 40.
16. Peterson JF, Pun BT, Dittus RS, etal. Delirium and its motoric sub­types:a study of 614 critically ill patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2006;54:479– 84.
17. Robinson TN, Raeburn CD, Tran ZV, Brenner LA, Moss M. Motor subtypes of postoperative delirium in older adults. Archives of Surgery- Chicago. 2011;146:295– 300.
18. Meagher DJ, Leonard M, Donnelly S, Conroy M, Adamis D, Trzepacz PT. A longitudinal study of motor subtypes in delir­ium: relationship with other phenomenology, etiology, medica­tion exposure and prognosis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2011;71:395– 403.
19. Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, et al. e Richmond Agitation­Sedation Scale— validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2002;166:1338– 44.
20. Riker RR, Picard JT, Fraser GL. Prospective evaluation of the Sedation- Agitation Scale for adult critically ill patients. Critical Care Medicine. 1999;27:1325– 9.
21. Inouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, Balkin S, Siegal AP, Horwitz RI. Clarifying confusion:the confusion assessment method; a new method for detection of delirium. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1990;113:941– 8.
22. Bellelli G, Morandi A, Davis DH, etal. Validation of the 4AT, a new instrument for rapid delirium screening:a study in 234 hospitalised older people. Age and Ageing. 2014;43:496– 502.
23. Ely EW, Inouye SK, Bernard GR, et al. Delirium in mechani­cally ventilated patients: validity and reliability of the confusion
assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM- ICU). Journal of the American Medical Association. 2001;286:2703– 10.
24. Bergeron N, Dubois MJ, Dumont M, Dial S, Skrobik Y. Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist:evaluation of a new screening tool. Intensive Care Medicine. 2001;27:859– 64.
25. Hughes CG, Patel MB, Pandharipande PP. Pathophysiology of acute brain dysfunction: what’s the cause of all this confusion? Current Opinions in Critical Care. 2012;18:518– 26.
26. Gunther ML, Morandi A, Krauskopf E, et al. e association between brain volumes, delirium duration, and cognitive out­comes in intensive care unit survivors: the VISIONS cohort magnetic resonance imaging study. Critical Care Medicine. 2012;40:2022– 32.
27. Morandi A, Rogers BP, Gunther ML, etal. e relationship between delirium duration, white matter integrity, and cognitive impairment in intensive care unit survivors as determined by diusion tensor imaging: the VISIONS prospective cohort magnetic resonance imaging study. Critical Care Medicine. 2012;40:2182– 9.
28. Zaal IJ, Devlin JW, Peelen LM, Slooter AJ. A systematic review of risk factors for delirium in the ICU. Critical Care Medicine. 2015;43:40– 7.
29. Lepouse C, Lautner CA, Liu L, Gomis P, Leon A. Emergence delir­ium in adults in the post- anaesthesia care unit. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2006;96:747– 53.
30. Radtke FM, Franck M, Hagemann L, Seeling M, Wernecke KD, Spies CD. Risk factors for inadequate emergence aer anesthe­sia: emergence delirium and hypoactive emergence. Minerva Anestesiologica. 2010;76:394– 403.
31. Marcantonio ER, Juarez G, Goldman L, etal. e relationship of postoperative delirium with psychoactive medications. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1994;272:1518– 22.
32. Pandharipande P, Shintani A, Peterson J, etal. Lorazepam is an inde­pendent risk factor for transitioning to delirium in intensive care unit patients. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:21– 6.
33. Pandharipande PP, Pun BT, Herr DL, etal. Eect of sedation with dex­medetomidine vs lorazepam on acute brain dysfunction in mechani­cally ventilated patients: the MENDS randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2007;298:2644– 53.
34. Riker RR, Shehabi Y, Bokesch PM, et al. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for sedation of critically ill patients:a randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2009;301:489– 99.
35. Dubois MJ, Bergeron N, Dumont M, Dial S, Skrobik Y. Delirium in an intensive care unit:a study of risk factors. Intensive Care Med. 2001;27:1297– 304.
36. Pandharipande P, Cotton BA, Shintani A, etal. Prevalence and risk factors for development of delirium in surgical and trauma intensive care unit patients. Journal of Trauma. 2008;65:34– 41.
37. Agarwal V, O’Neill PJ, Cotton BA, et al. Prevalence and risk fac­tors for development of delirium in burn intensive care unit patients. Journal of Burn Care and Research. 2010;31:706– 15.
38. Morrison RS MJ, Gilbert M, Koval KJ, etal. Relationship between pain and opioid analgesics on the development of delirium fol­lowing hip fracture. Journals of Gerontology Series A:Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2003;58:76– 81.
39. Sieber FE, Mears S, Lee H, Gottschalk A. Postoperative opioid consumption and its relationship to cognitive function in older adults with hip fracture. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2011;59:2256– 62.
40. Pandharipande P, Cotton BA, Shintani A, etal. Prevalence and risk factors for development of delirium in surgical and trauma intensive care unit patients. J Trauma. 2008;65:34– 41.
41. Prakanrattana U, Prapaitrakool S. Ecacy of risperidone for preven­tion of postoperative delirium in cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 2007;35:714– 9.
42. Balas MC, Burke WJ, Gannon D, etal. Implementing the awaken­ing and breathing coordination, delirium monitoring/ management,
454 SECTION A. CEREBRAL ORIGIN
https://t.me/medicina_free
455
and early exercise/ mobility bundle into everyday care: opportu­nities, challenges, and lessons learned for implementing the ICU Pain, Agitation, and Delirium Guidelines. Critical Care Medicine. 2013;41:S116– 27.
43. Schweickert WD, Pohlman MC, Pohlman AS, etal. Early physical and occupational therapy in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients:a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;373:1874– 82.
44. Inouye SK, Bogardus ST Jr, Charpentier PA, etal. A multicompo­nent intervention to prevent delirium in hospitalized older patients. New England Journal of Medicine. 1999;340:669– 76.
45. Girard TD, Pandharipande PP, Carson SS, etal. Feasibility, ecacy, and safety of antipsychotics for intensive care unit delirium: the MIND randomized, placebo- controlled trial. Critical Care Medicine. 2010;38:428– 37.
46. Devlin JW, Roberts RJ, Fong JJ, etal. Ecacy and safety of quetiap­ine in critically ill patients with delirium:a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double- blind, placebo- controlled pilot study. Critical Care Medicine. 2010;38:419– 27.
47. Reade MC, O’Sullivan K, Bates S, Goldsmith D, Ainslie WR, Bellomo R. Dexmedetomidine vs. haloperidol in delirious, agitated, intubated patients: a randomised open- label trial. Critical Care. 2009;13:R75.
48. Page VJ, Davis D, Zhao XB, etal. Statin use and risk of delirium in the critically ill. American Journal of Respiratory and Crit Care Medicine. 2014;189:666– 73.
49. Shyamsundar M, McKeown ST, O’Kane CM, et al. Simvastatin decreases lipopolysaccharide- induced pulmonary inammation in healthy volunteers. American Journal of Respiratory and Crit Care Medicine. 2009;179:1107– 14.
50. Tune LE DN, Holland A, Gardner TJ, Folstein MF, Coyle JT. Association of postoperative delirium with raised serum levels of anticholinergic drugs. Lancet. 1981;2:651– 3.
51. Golinger RC, Peet T, Tube LE. Association of elevated plasma anti­cholinergic activity with delirium in surgical patients. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1987;144:1218– 20.
52. Gamberini M, Bolliger D, Lurati Buse GA, Burkhart CS, et al. Rivastigmine for the prevention of postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery- - a randomized con­trolled trial. Critical Care Medicine. 2009;37:1762– 8.
53. van Eijk MM, Roes KC, Honing ML, Kuiper MA, et al. Eect of rivastigmine as an adjunct to usual care with haloperidol on dura­tion of delirium and mortality in critically ill patients: a multicen­tre, double- blind, placebo- controlled randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;376:1839– 37.
54. Lepouse C, Lautner CA, Liu L, Gomis P, Leon A. Emergence delir­ium in adults in the post- anaesthesia care unit. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2006;96:747– 53.
55. Radtke FM, Franck M, Hagemann L, Seeling M, Wernecke KD, Spies CD. Risk factors for inadequate emergence aer
anesthesia:emergence delirium and hypoactive emergence. Minerva Anestesiologic. 2010;76:394– 403.
56. Taipale PG, Ratner PA, Galdas PM, etal. e association between nurse- administered midazolam following cardiac surgery and inci­dent delirium: an observational study. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2012;49:1064– 73.
57. Marcantonio ER, Juarez G, Goldman L, etal. e relationship of postoperative delirium with psychoactive medications. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1994;272:1518– 22.
58. Maldonado JR, Wysong A, van der Starre PJ, Block T, Miller C, Reitz BA. Dexmedetomidine and the reduction of postoperative delirium aer cardiac surgery. Psychosomatics. 2009;50:206– 17.
59. Shehabi Y, Grant P, Wolfenden H, etal. Prevalence of delirium with dexmedetomidine compared with morphine based therapy aer cardiac surgery:a randomized controlled trial (DEXmedetomidine COmpared to Morphine- DEXCOM Study). Anesthesiology. 2009;111:1075– 84.
60. Royse CF, Andrews DT, Newman SN, etal. e inuence of pro­pofol or desurane on postoperative cognitive dysfunction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:455– 64.
61. American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on Postoperative Delirium in Older Adults. American Geriatrics Society abstracted clinical practice guideline for postoperative delirium in older adults. Journal of the American Geriatric Society. 2015;63:142– 50.
62. Parker MJ, Handoll HH, Griths R. Anaesthesia for hip frac­ture surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews. 2004:CD000521.
63. Mason SE, Noel- Storr A, Ritchie CW. e impact of general and regional anesthesia on the incidence of post- operative cogni­tive dysfunction and post- operative delirium: a systematic review with meta- analysis. Journal of Alzheimers Disease. 2010;22(Suppl
3):67– 79.
64. Sieber FE, Zakriya KJ, Gottschalk A, etal. Sedation depth during spinal anesthesia and the development of postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture repair. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2010;85:18– 26.
65. Kinjo S, Lim E, Sands LP, Bozic KJ, Leung JM. Does using a femo­ral nerve block for total knee replacement decrease postoperative delirium? Biomed Central Anesthesiology. 2012;12:4.
66. Leung JM, Sands LP, Rico M, etal. Pilot clinical trial of gabapen­tin to decrease postoperative delirium in older patients. Neurology. 2006;67:1251– 3.
67. Krenk L, Rasmussen LS, Hansen TB, Bogo S, Soballe K, Kehlet H. Delirium aer fast- track hip and knee arthroplasty. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2012;108:607– 11.
68. Kurbegovic S, Andersen J, Krenk L, Kehlet H. Delirium in fast- track colonic surgery. Langenbecks Archives of Surgery. 2015;400:513– 6.
DELIRIUM 455
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025