Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 911 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
8 Мб
Скачать
326
https://t.me/medicina_free
placenta, so its use should be avoided unless it is considered absolutely essential.
22
e role of myocardial biopsy in PPCM remains unclear. Histological classication for the diagnosis of PPCM is currently lacking. Previous studies have reported evidence of myocarditis, progressive death of cardiac myocytes, and destruction of the cytoskeleton in myocardial biopsies of patients with PPCM. Additionally, cardiac catheterization is rarely indicated in PPCM. Le cardiac catheterization is only indicated when coronary artery disease is suspected as a possible etiology for the cardiomyopathy. e informa­tion commonly obtained with right heart catheterization (i.e., cardiac pressures) can be obtained via less invasive methods including ECG and cardiacMRI.
B- type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N- terminal pro­BNP (NT- proBNP) increase nearly twofold in pregnant women compared with nonpregnant women as early as the rst trimester and does not signicantly uctuate dur­ing pregnancy.10 Patients with PPCM frequently have BNP or NT- proBNP values that are up to ve times higher than those in normal pregnant women.9 One study found a BNP < 100 pg/ mL had a negative predictive value of 100% for identifying cardiac events during pregnancy in women with heart disease.23 Serum markers for inammation and oxida­tive stress may provide further support for the diagnosis of PPCM. Although CRP and high sensitivity CRP (hs- CRP) are usually normal or mildly increased in pregnancy, they have been reported to be signicantly elevated in patients with PPCM.10 Interferon- γ decreases during normal preg- nancy but increases with PPCM.8 A marker for oxidative stress, oxLDL increases incrementally during normal preg­nancy but is signicantly elevated in women withPPCM.
MEDICAL MANAGEMENT OFPERIPARTUM
CARDIOMYOPATHY
Management of PPCM follows current heart failure guide­lines, with careful consideration of the implications of spe­cic therapies during pregnancy and lactation (Table 46.1). Treatment of heart failure in the peripartum period focuses on maintenance of adequate oxygenation, optimization of ventricular function, and avoidance of thrombotic com­plications. Severe cases of PPCM may require mechanical circulatory support including intra- aortic balloon coun­terpulsation pump (IABP), extracorporeal membrane oxy­genation (ECMO), implantation of a le ventricular assist device (LVAD), or even heart transplantation. erapies
TABLE46.1 PREGNANCY AND LACTATION RISK ASSOCIATED
WITHMEDICATIONS COMMONLY USED INTHE TREATMENT OFHEART FAILURE
Medication
FDA Pregnancy
AAP Lactation Rating
Category*
Diuretics
Furosemide Hydrochlorothiazide Spironolactone
ACE Inhibitors
Lisinopril Captopril
Enalapril
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers
Losartan Valsartan
Peripheral Vasodilators
Hydralazine Nitroglycerin Nitroprusside
Beta- blockers
Metoprolol
Bisoprolol Carvedilol
Inotrope
Dobutamine Dopamine Milrinone Epinephrine
8
Norepinephrine
Anticoagulation
Unfractionated heparin Enoxaparin Warfarin
FDA=US Food and Drug Administration
AAP=American Academy of Pediatrics
Category B:Animal reproduction studies have failed to demonstrate a risk to the fetus, and
there are no adequate and well- controlled studies in pregnantwomen.
Category C:Animal reproduction studies have shown an adverse effect on the fetus, and
there are no adequate and well- controlled studies in humans, but potential benets may
warrant use of the drug in pregnant women despite potentialrisks.
Category D:There is positive evidence of human fetal risk based on adverse reaction data
from investigational or marketing experience or studies in humans, but potential benets
may warrant use of the drug in pregnant women despite potentialrisks.
Category X:Studies in animals or humans have demonstrated fetal abnormalities and/
or there is positive evidence of human fetal risk based on adverse reaction data from
investigational or marketing experience, and the risks involved in use of the drug in pregnant
women clearly outweigh potential benets.
C B C
D D
D
D D
C C C
C
C C
B C C C C
C B X
Unknown Risk UnknownRisk Breast- Feeding Compatible
Unknown Risk Breast- Feeding Compatible Breast- Feeding Compatible
Unknown Risk Unknown Risk
Breast- Feeding Compatible UnknownRisk Unknown Risk
Breast- Feeding Compatible UnknownRisk Unknown Risk
Unknown Risk UnknownRisk UnknownRisk UnknownRisk Unknown Risk
Unknown Risk UnknownRisk Breast- feeding Compatible
326 SECTION B. CARDIAC CRISES
https://t.me/medicina_free
327
directed at the underlying cause of PPCM have been explored, but universal acceptance of a specic “targeted therapy” for PPCM is lacking.
outcomes in dilated cardiomyopathies and may be protec­tive against tachyarrhythmias.25 Beta1- selective blockers (metoprolol and bisoprolol) are preferred over nonselective beta blockers (propranolol). Beta2- receptor blockade may
OXYGENATION
facilitate contractions by inhibiting uterine smooth muscle relaxation. Beta1 blockers are generally considered safe dur-
ing pregnancy (risk category C).10 ere are some reports Patients presenting with severe heart failure may require the administration of supplemental oxygen, with a goal of maintaining oxygen saturation (SpO2) > 95%. Adequate oxygenation may necessitate use of noninvasive ventilation (CPAP/ BiPAP) or intubation with mechanical ventilation.
suggesting that antepartum Beta blocker use is associated
with intrauterine growth restriction and preterm birth.14
Newborns born to mothers receiving beta blockade should
be closely monitor for transient bradycardia, hypoglycemia,
and respiratory depression. Positive end- expiratory pressure (PEEP) is instrumental in preventing alveolar collapse, increasing lung compliance, and counteracting hydrostatic uid ow into the alveoli.
VASODILATORS
Vasodilators improve LV function by reducing aerload,
PHARMACOLOGIC THERAPY
Proper treatment of PPCM can range from that similar to patients with systolic heart failure in the general population all the way to acute, invasive therapies for PPCM that pres­ents or worsens acutely around delivery.
decreasing preload, and optimizing intracardiac lling pres-
sures. Hydralazine is considered safe during pregnancy and
is the primary vasodilator used in the antepartum period.
Intravenous nitroglycerin may be necessary in the setting
of high cardiac lling pressures with decompensated heart
failure. Uteroplacental blood ow is not autoregulated—
precipitous decreases in blood pressure may compromise
placental perfusion.
DIURETICS
Diuretics are commonly administered to optimize ventric­ular function by reducing preload. Intravenous administra­tion should be considered in the setting of orid volume overload leading to pulmonary congestion and/ or periph­eral edema. Furosemide is preferred over thiazide diuret­ics in the peripartum period.10 Diuretic- induced volume depletion can lead to decreased uterine perfusion and oligo­hydramnios. Fetal amniotic uid volume should be moni­tored in parturients receiving diuretics.
NEUROHORMONAL BLOCKADE
24
Impeding the renin- angiotensin system with angiotensin­converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE- Is) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) has been shown to improve mor­tality in heart failure.25 Due to the high rate of teratogenic eects, including renal agenesis, oligohydramnios, and fetal
DIGOXIN
Digoxin is an inotropic and dromotropic agent used for
the treatment of tachycardia (atrial brillation with rapid
ventricular response and/ or persistent heart failure symp-
toms despite treatment with beta blockers and vasodilators.
Digoxin crosses the placenta and is considered risk category
C.Digoxin level must be carefully monitored to avoid inad-
vertent toxicity.
INOTROPES
Inotropes may be indicated in the setting of low cardiac
output with hypoperfusion and/ or refractory pulmonary
edema. Specic intravenous inotropes used in PPCM include
dobutamine (risk category B), milrinone (risk category C),
or dopamine (risk category C). Evidence guiding the use of
inotropic agents in acute decompensated PPCM is lacking. death, ACE- Is and ARBs are contraindicated during preg-
26,27
nancy. ing lactation due to the low transfer into breast milk.10 e ACE- I therapy should continue for as long as the LV func­tion remains impaired.
PPCM. Beta blockers have been shown to improved
Captopril and enalapril are considered safe dur-
Beta blockade should be considered in women with
ANTICOAGULATION
Women with PPCM are particularly vulnerable to throm-
botic complications due to the additive risks of pregnancy-
induced hypercoagulability and decreased cardiac output.
Although the incidence of thromboembolic complications
PERIPARTUM CARDIOMYOPATHY 327
328
https://t.me/medicina_free
in PPCM is unknown, anticoagulation should be consid­ered for all women with an LVEF < 35% during the peri­partum period. Of note, an LV thrombus is detected in up to 17% of women at the time of PPCM diagnosis.28 Unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin (risk category C) do not cross the placenta and are the pre­ferred mode of anticoagulation in the antepartum period.
structures, promoting vasoconstriction, and impairing cardiomyocyte function.14 Small, preliminary studies have demonstrated bromocriptine prevents the formation of PPCM in animal models and leads to improvement in LV function in patients with PPCM.
14,17
Bromocriptine impairs lactation, and its use in the treatment of PPCM is still controversial.
Warfarin (risk category D) should be avoided during preg­nancy but is considered compatible with breastfeeding.
OBSTETRIC MANAGEMENT OFPERIPARTUM CARDIOMYOPATHY
INVASIVE THERAPY
e timing and mode of delivery in parturients with PPCM
Severe PPCM unresponsive to pharmacotherapy may require mechanical circulatory support. During pregnancy, IABPs, ECMO, and LVADs are not recommended and should only be initiated following delivery. Since PPCM can dramatically improve within the postpartum period, prolonged circulatory support has been used as a bridge to recovery, dramatically reducing the percentage of PPCM patients requiring transplantation from 33% to 7%.11 Heart transplantation is reserved for severe cases in patients who are refractory to optimal medical treatment and mechanical circulatory support.
Ventricular arrhythmias have been reported in up to 20% of patients with PPCM.29 In addition, sudden cardiac death (SCD) has been reported in PPCM patients with decreased LV function, as well as in patients with subse­quent normalization of their EF.10 ere are currently no
is usually determined by the maternal functional status and obstetric indications. Vaginal delivery is preferred in medically optimized patients with well- compensated heart failure. e second stage of labor may be assisted with for­ceps or vacuum extraction to avoid the adverse hemody­namic consequence of repeated and/ or prolonged Valsalva maneuvers. Cesarean delivery may be necessary for clinical scenarios requiring expedient delivery including mater­nal cardiorespiratory compromise and/ or fetal distress. Although cesarean delivery is associated with increased hemodynamic perturbations, greater blood loss, enhanced risk of postoperative infections, and greater frequency of postpartum thrombophlebitis, it may be indicated in severe, decompensated heart failure. Regardless of the mode of delivery, the anesthetic technique should be tai-
lored to minimize hemodynamic uctuations. guidelines for the placement of implantable cardioverter debrillators (ICD) in patients with PPCM. e benet of ICD placement must be weighed against the evidence that
ANESTHETIC MANAGEMENT
LV function returns to normal in many PPCM patients within 6 months. Patients with persistent heart failure symptoms despite optimal medical treatment for 6months and those whose EF remains <30% may be candidates for ICD implantation for primary prevention ofSCD.
10
Appropriate intrapartum anesthetic management of PPCM
depends on the mode and urgency of delivery, as well as the
physiologic condition of the parturient. Anesthetic guide-
lines include avoidance of myocardial depression, main-
tenance of normovolemia, and prevention of increased
TARGETED THERAPY
ventricular aerload. Routine monitors should include
continuous ECG, noninvasive blood pressure, and pulse
oximetry. In the setting of decompensated heart failure, Several groups have attempted to mitigate cardiac injury and improve symptomatology through therapies directed against proposed pathophysiologic mechanisms of PPCM. e most promising targeted therapy is bromocriptine, an inhibitor of prolactin (PRL) (Figure 46.1). Inhibition of PRL decreases the production of the 16kDa PRL frag­ment implicated in inhibiting endothelial cell proliferation, inducing endothelial cell apoptosis, disrupting capillary
invasive blood pressure and central venous pressure moni-
toring may be indicated. Regardless of the mode of deliv-
ery, close attention should be directed at maternal position.
Lateral decubitus position relieves uterine compression of
the IVC and allows unobstructed venous return.
Neuraxial anesthesia is generally preferred for both vaginal and cesarean deliveries. Neuraxial anesthesia blunts sympathetic stimulation characteristic of labor and delivery.
328 SECTION B. CARDIAC CRISES
https://t.me/medicina_free
329
Mitigation of sympathetic stimulation limits plasma cate­cholamine surges, decreases aerload, and increases venous capacitance. Epidural anesthesia is favored over a single­shot spinal technique. e signicant decrease in systemic vascular resistance (SVR) accompanying spinal anesthesia may compromise coronary perfusion and further contrib­ute to cardiac dysfunction. Adequate labor analgesia and/ or surgical anesthesia should be accomplished with slow
a signicant increase in aerload. e combined inuences of blood loss and autotransfusion can lead to dramatic uctuations in central blood volume for approximately 24 hours following delivery. Women with severe reductions in LV systolic function are at increased risk of developing heart failure symptoms during this period. Cardiac complications in the immediate postpartum period include pulmonary
edema, tachyarrhythmias, and pulmonary/ systemic emboli. titration of neuraxial local anesthetics and opioids. Low concentrations of local anesthetics are recommended for labor analgesia.
General anesthesia may be indicated for obstetric and/
PROGNOSIS WITHPERIPARTUM CARDIOMYOPATHY
or patient factors including, but not limited to, emergency cesarean section, coagulopathy, and/ or intracranial/ neur­axial pathology. e specic challenge of general anesthe­sia includes maintaining hemodynamic stability despite the stimulating eect of laryngoscopy and surgery and the myocardial depressant eects of volatile and intravenous anesthetics. e hypertensive response of laryngoscopy can be mitigated with opioids. Short- acting opioids (remi­fentanil, alfentanil, and fentanyl) should be considered until delivery of the fetus. If high- dose narcotics are used for maternal induction, neonatal resuscitation should be expected following delivery. Intravenous induction agents (i.e., propofol) and volatile anesthetics may compromise myocardial contractility and reduce SVR. Inotropes (dobu­tamine, dopamine) may be necessary to optimize cardiac output and systemic perfusion. Regardless of the specic technique, anesthesia for cesarean delivery should optimize hemodynamic stability by avoiding arrhythmias, maintain­ing myocardial contractility, and preventing acute changes inSVR.
POSTPARTUMCARE
Compared to individuals with other causes of cardiomyopa-
thy, women with PPCM are more likely to have myocardial
recovery, dened as improvement in LVEF to 50%.
30,31
Published data regarding recovery of LV function vary
widely, ranging from 23% to 54%.14 Dierences in reported
LV recovery rates may be due to environment inuences,
genetic dierences, social factors, and follow- up period
variations. e 6- month recovery rate was only 23% in 176
patients with PPCM from South Africa;32 whereas patients
of the United States have a reported recovery ranging from
45% to 78%.19 Goland et al. demonstrated that African
Americans have a decreased rate of LV recovery compared
to Caucasians with PPCM, 40% versus 61%, respectively.33
Recovery usually occurs between 3 and 6months postpar-
tum but might occur as late as 48months. Some dispari-
ties in recovery rates may be due to inconsistencies in the
follow- up period.
Peripartum cardiomyopathy is associated with signi­cant morbidity and mortality. Mortality for PPCM in the United States ranges from 0 to 16.5%;
5,7,28,31,34
whereas a single tertiary center in Turkey reported a mortality rate of 30% over 4years of follow- up.35 Morbidity can be substantial and includes severe heart failure, cardiogenic
Following delivery the patient should recover in a critical care environment with continuous hemodynamic moni­toring, careful uid management, and adequate analgesia. Cardiac output can increase by 80% above prelabor values immediately aer delivery due to autotransfusion and relief of inferior vena cava (IVC) compression. e increase in pre­load is partially counteracted by blood loss during delivery, with an estimated blood loss of 400 mL for vaginal delivery and 800 mL for cesarean section. In the setting of postpar­tum hemorrhage, uterotonic agents should be used cau­tiously due their associated side eects. Oxytocin (Pitocin) can cause a marked decrease in SVR and has an antidiuretic eect at higher doses. Ergometrine (Methergine) may cause
shock, and arrhythmias.19 In addition, women with a his­tory of PPCM are at increased risk of adverse events during a subsequent pregnancy compared with pregnant women without PPCM.
36– 38
e risk of recurrence in subsequent pregnancies is high, and LVEF, once improved, can worsen again. Women at greatest risk are those who have not had full myocardial recovery (EF < 50%).37 In a study of 44 women who recovered from PPCM and subsequently became pregnant, LVEF deterioration was more frequent in those with a partial recovery than in those with complete recovery (44% vs. 21%).37 Of note, women with a history of PPCM with subsequent full myocardial recovery by ECG, may have decreased contractile reserve as measured by
PERIPARTUM CARDIOMYOPATHY 329
330
https://t.me/medicina_free
dobutamine stress ECG.39 erefore, great caution should be exercised in women with a history of PPCM during sub­sequent pregnancies.
CASE- BASED LEARNING DISCUSSION
1. How would you evaluate this patient? Would you request any ancillary tests and/ orlabs?
2. What would your initial management of this patient entail? What medications would you administer? How would you monitor this patient?
3. e patient becomes increasingly tachypneic and tachycardia. SpO2 is 85% on 100% O2 administered via facemask. Noninvasive blood pressure measurement is 80/ 50. How would you further evaluate and manage this patient?
4. Six months postpartum, the patient’s EF has recovered to 55%. She is interested in becoming pregnant again. What is her risk of reoccurrence?
5. During the patient’s second pregnancy she develops PPCM at 38 weeks gestation. She presents dyspneic and tachycardic to the labor and delivery suite. Echocardiogram reveals an EF of 15%. e fetal heart tracing is concerning for repetitive late decelerations. e obstetric team would like to proceed with a cesarean delivery. What is your preferred anesthesia technique? What monitors would you use? What are your intraoperative concerns?
REFERENCES
1. Creanga AA, Berg CJ, Syverson C, Seed K, Bruce FC, Callaghan
WM. Pregnancy- related mortality in the United States, 2006– 2010. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015;125(1):5– 12.
2. Sanderson JE, Adesanya CO, Anjorin FI, Parry EH. Postpartum car-
diac failure:heart failure due to volume overload? American Heart Journal. 1979;97(5):613– 21.
3. Fett JD, Christie LG, Carraway RD, Murphy JG. Five- year pro-
spective study of the incidence and prognosis of peripartum car­diomyopathy at a single institution. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2005;80(12):1602– 6.
4. Desai D, Moodley J, Naidoo D. Peripartum cardiomyopathy:expe-
riences at King Edward VIII Hospital, Durban, South Africa and a review of the literature. Tropical Doctor. 1995;25(3):118– 23.
5. Mielniczuk LM, Williams K, Davis DR, et al. Frequency of
peripartum cardiomyopathy. American Journal of Cardiology. 2006;97(12):1765– 8.
6. Gentry MB, Dias JK, Luis A , Patel R, ornton J, Reed GL. African-
American women have a higher risk for developing peripartum cardiomyopathy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2010;55(7):654– 9.
7. Elkayam U, Akhter MW, Singh H, etal. Pregnancy- associated car­diomyopathy: Clinical characteristics and a comparison between early and late presentation. Circulation. 2005;111(16):2050– 55.
8. Forster O, Hilker- Kleiner D, Ansari AA, et al. Reversal of IFN­gamma, oxLDL and prolactin serum levels correlate with clini­cal improvement in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2008;10(9):861– 8.
9. Sliwa K, Forster O, Libhaber E, et al. Peripartum cardiomyopa­thy:Inammatory markers as predictors of outcome in 100 prospec­tively studied patients. European Heart Journal. 2006;27(4):441– 6.
10. Blauwet LA, Cooper LT. Diagnosis and management of peripartum cardiomyopathy. Heart. 2011;97(23):1970– 81.
11. Bhattacharyya A, Basra SS, Sen P, Kar B. Peripartum cardiomyopa­thy:a review. Texas Heart Institute Journal. 2012;39(1):8– 16.
12. Hilker- Kleiner D, Haghikia A, Nonho J, Bauersachs J. Peripartum cardiomyopathy: current management and future perspectives. European Heart Journal. 2015;36(18):1090– 97.
13. van Spaendonck- Zwarts KY, van Tintelen JP, van Veldhuisen DJ, etal. Peripartum cardiomyopathy as a part of familial dilated cardio­myopathy. Circulation. 2010;121(20):2169– 75.
14. Bachelier- Walenta K, Hilker- Kleiner D, Sliwa K. Peripartum car­diomyopathy: Update 2012. Current Opinions in Critical Care. 2013;19(5):397– 403.
15. Patten IS, Rana S, Shahul S, etal. Cardiac angiog enic imbalance leads to peripartum cardiomyopathy. Nature. 2012;485(7398):333– 8.
16. Hilker- Kleiner D, Kaminski K, Podewski E, etal. A cathepsin D­cleaved 16 kDa form of prolactin mediates postpartum cardiomy­opathy. Cell. 2007;128(3):589– 600.
17. Sliwa K, Blauwet L, Tibazar wa K, etal. Evaluation of bromocriptine in the treatment of acute severe peripartum cardiomyopathy:Aproof­of- concept pilot study. Circulation. 2010;121(13):1465– 73.
18. Sliwa K, Hilker- Kleiner D, Petrie MC, et al. Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of peripartum cardiomyopathy: a position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology working group on peripartum cardiomyopathy. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2010;12(8):767– 78.
19. Elkayam U. Clinical characteristics of peripartum cardiomyopathy in the United States:Diagnosis, prognosis, and management. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2011;58(7):659– 70.
20. Pearson GD, Veille JC, Rahimtoola S, etal. Peripartum cardiomy­opathy: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and Oce of Rare Diseases (National Institutes of Health) workshop recommen­dations and review. JAMA. 2000;283(9):1183– 8.
21. Hibbard JU, Lindheimer M, Lang RM. A modied denition for peripartum cardiomyopathy and prognosis based on echocardiogra­phy. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1999;94(2):311– 6.
22. Expert Panel on MR Safety, Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, etal. ACR guid­ance document on MR safe practices:2013. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;37(3):501– 530.
23. Tanous D, Siu SC, Mason J, etal. B- type natriuretic peptide in preg­nant women with heart disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2010;56(15):1247– 53.
24. Lindheimer MD, Katz AI. Sodium and diuretics in pregnancy. New England Journal of Medicine. 1973;288(17):891– 4.
25. Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, et al. 2009 focused update incorporated into the ACC/ AHA 2005 guidelines for the diagnosis and management of heart failure in adults Areport of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/ American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines developed in collaboration with the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2009;53(15):e1– e90.
26. Alwan S, Polia JE, Friedman JM. Angiotensin II receptor antago­nist treatment during pregnancy. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2005;73(2):123– 30.
27. Lavoratti G, Seracini D, Fiorini P, etal. Neonatal anuria by ACE inhibitors during pregnancy. Nephron. 1997;76(2):235– 6.
330 SECTION B. CARDIAC CRISES
https://t.me/medicina_free
331
28. Amos AM, Jaber WA, Russell SD. Improved outcomes in peripar­tum cardiomyopathy with contemporary. American Heart Journal. 2006;152(3):509– 13.
29. Diao M, Diop IB, Kane A, etal. Electrocardiographic recording of long duration (holter) of 24 hours during idiopathic cardiomyopathy of the peripartum. Archives Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2004;97(1):25– 30.
30. Cooper LT, Mather PJ, Alexis JD, etal. Myocardial recovery in peripartum cardiomyopathy: Prospective comparison with recent onset cardiomyopathy in men and nonperipartum women. Journal Cardiac Failure. 2012;18(1):28– 33.
31. Felker GM, ompson RE, Hare JM, etal. Underlying causes and long- term survival in patients with initially unexplained cardiomy­opathy. New England Journal of Medicine. 2000;342(15):1077– 84.
32. Blauwet LA, Libhaber E, Forster O, etal. Predictors of outcome in 176 South African patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy. Heart. 2013;99(5):308– 13.
33. Goland S, Modi K, Hatamizadeh P, Elkayam U. Dierences in clinical prole of African- American women with peripartum car­diomyopathy in the United States. Journal of Cardiac Failure. 2013;19(4):214– 8.
34. Brar SS, Khan SS, Sandhu GK, etal. Incidence, mortality, and racial dierences in peripartum cardiomyopathy. American Journal of Cardiology. 2007;100(2):302– 304.
35. Biteker M, Ilhan E, Biteker G, Duman D, Bozkurt B. Delayed recov­ery in peripartum cardiomyopathy: AN indication for long- term follow- up and sustained therapy. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2012;14(8):895– 901.
36. Habli M, O’Brien T, Nowack E, Khoury S, Barton JR, Sibai B. Peripartum cardiomyopathy: prognostic factors for long- term maternal outcome. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008;199(4):415.e1– 415.e5.
37. Elkayam U, Tummala PP, Rao K, etal. Maternal and fetal outcomes of subsequent pregnancies in women with peripartum cardiomyopa­thy. New England Journal of Medicine. 2001;344(21):1567– 71.
38. Fett JD, Fristoe KL, Welsh SN. Risk of heart failure relapse in subsequent pregnancy among peripartum cardiomyopathy mothers. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2010;109(1):34– 36.
39. Lampert MB, Weinert L, Hibbard J, Korcarz C, Lindheimer M, Lang RM. Contractile reserve in patients with peripartum cardio­myopathy and recovered le ventricular function. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1997;176(1 Pt 1):189– 95.
PERIPARTUM CARDIOMYOPATHY 331
332
https://t.me/medicina_free
47.
PERIPARTUM EMBOLISM
Elizabeth M.S. Lange and PalomaToledo
AMNIOTIC FLUID EMBOLISM
CASE
A 31- year- old G2P1 at 36 weeks is undergoing cesarean delivery under epidural anesthesia for arrest of dilation following induction of labor for twin gestation and pree­clampsia when she experiences sudden onset of shortness of breath.
MECHANISM
Amniotic uid embolism (AFE) was historically believed to be due to embolism of squamous cells, mucin, meconium, and amorphous eosinophilic material into the maternal cir­culation. Current evidence suggests that emboli alone are insucient to precipitate this event. While the pathophys­iology remains poorly understood, the most likely mech­anism is a systemic inammatory response associated with the inappropriate release of endogenous inammatory mediators, including arachidonic acid metabolites (i.e., thromboxane, prostaglandins, leukotrienes, endothelins).1 e exact trigger for the reaction in women with AFE is unknown.
RISK FACTORS
Amniotic uid embolism has been associated with obstetric factors such as abnormal placentation, placental abruption, eclampsia, multiple gestation, induction of labor, arti­cial or spontaneous rupture of membranes, and operative delivery. AFE include older age and race or ethnicity.
2– 6
Maternal demographic factors associated with
2,3
Amniotic uid embolism has been described following antepartum abdominal trauma,7 aer rst- trimester abortions,8 during the second trimester,9 at the time of delivery,6 and in the postpartum period.
10
ASSESSMENT (PRESENTING SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS)
e classic presentation of AFE includes acute respiratory distress, cardiovascular collapse, and coagulopathy near the time of delivery in the absence of other diagnoses, and it remains a diagnosis of exclusion.
1,6,11
e scope of syn­dromes that may accompany AFE is broad and is shown in Box 47.1.
1,6,11
e extensive dierential diagnosis for AFE should include nonobstetric, obstetric, and anesthetic causes (Table 47.1). Even though the time course and clin­ical presentation of many of the competing diagnoses over­lap, only AFE and massive placental abruption result in a relatively sudden onset consumptive coagulopathy aer maternal collapse.
Amniotic uid embolism most oen occurs during
2,6
labor.
Maternal symptoms typically occur rst; how­ever, in some instances, fetal heart rate changes, such as bradycardia or variable decelerations, may precede mater­nal symptoms.6 Presentation of AFE is biphasic. During the initial phase, acute pulmonary hypertension results in right ventricular failure, a decrease in cardiac output, and ventilation- perfusion mismatch leading to hypoxemia. Right ventricular failure leads to right ventricular dilation, which bulges into and compresses the le ventricle, thereby impeding le ventricular lling and eventually decreasing cardiac output.
12,13
Endogenous catecholamine release may produce a brief period of systemic hypertension and uterine tachysystole that precedes hypotension or cardiac arrest.6 Aprofound shunt may be found on arterial blood gas anal­ysis and patients can demonstrate severe hypoxemia despite high levels of inspired oxygen.
6
A second phase commences when right ventricular function improves,13 typically 15 to 30 minutes aer the initial event. Le ventricular failure oen persists in the sec­ond stage, and is accompanied by decreased systemic ven­tricular resistance, decreased le ventricular stroke index,
332
https://t.me/medicina_free
333
TABLE47.1 FEATURES OFAMNIOTIC FLUID EMBOLISM
BOX 47.1 DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OFAMNIOTIC FLUID
EMBOLISM
Nonobstetric
ATPRESENTATION
Percent Exhibiting Feature (n=60)*
Percent Exhibiting Feature as First Symptom or Sign (n=60)*
Myocardial infarction
Pulmonary embolism
Aspiration
Sepsis
Anaphylaxis
Venous air embolism
Maternal hemorrhage 65% 2%
Hypotension 63% 8%
Shortness of breath 62% 20%
Coagulopathy 62% 0%
Premonitory symptoms (i.e., restlessness, agitation, numbness, tingling)
Acute fetal compromise 43% 20%
47% 30%
Obstetric
Cardiac arrest 40% 8%
Placental abruption
Eclampsia
Magnesium toxicity
Uterine rupture or laceration
Uterineatony
Dysrhythmias 27% 5%
Seizure 15% 7%
* Some women had multiple features; therefore, the totals are greater than100%.
SOURCE:Data from Knight M, Tuffnell D, Brocklehurst P, etal. Incidence and risk factors for
amniotic- uid embolism. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 115:910– 17.
to guide volume resuscitation and to select appropriate
Anesthetic
High neuraxial blockade (“total spinal”)
Local anesthetic systemic toxicity
Medicationerror
and acute pulmonary edema.
14,15
Continued progression with obstetric hemorrhage and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy is prototypical. Laboratory evaluation may reveal anemia, thrombocytopenia, prolonged prothrombin time or activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) or both, and decreased brinogen levels.
MANAGEMENT OFPATIENT
6,16
Maternal resuscitation should focus on three priori­ties:(1)maintenance of oxygenation, (2)hemodynamic sup-
vasopressor therapy. In the event of maternal cardiopulmo­nary arrest, the American Heart Association recommends that delivery of the fetus should occur within 5 minutes to increase the probability of good outcomes for both the mother and her neonate.17 Intact neonatal survival is related to the time interval from the onset of maternal compromise to delivery.
6
Other management strategies described for AFE include: the use of cardiopulmonary bypass, extracorpo­real membrane oxygenation, continuous hemoltration, and exchange transfusions.
2,12,18
e usage of inhaled nitric oxide, prostacyclin, right ventricular assist devices, and vasopressor and inotropic infusions such as vasopressin, epinephrine dobutamine, and milrinone may be benecial in the management of early right- sided heart failure.
19,20
e use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and intra- aortic balloon counterpulsation has been reported for management of le- sided heart failure.
21
port, and (3)correction of coagulopathy. Upon recognition of AFE, 100% oxygen should be delivered. Management may include intubation, initiation of large- bore intravenous access, invasive access (i.e., arterial line and central venous pressure catheter), and activation of a massive transfusion protocol. Transesophageal echocardiography may be useful
FOLLOW- UP
Given the consumptive coagulopathy and the need for massive transfusion and potentially continued pharma­cologic hemodynamic support, these patients should be
PERIPARTUM EMBOLISM 333
334
https://t.me/medicina_free
monitored in an intensive care unit with serial labora­tory evaluations. Maternal mortality rates are high fol­lowing AFE, and many women who survive have residual cognitive sequelae.
CASE- BASED DISCUSSION
1. e patient begins feeling short of breath and becomes
endometrium can be caused by the separation of the pla­centa from the uterine wall, accelerating the coagulation cascade. Furthermore, pregnancy is a hypercoagulable state, associated with enhanced platelet turnover, an increase in prothrombotic coagulation factors, and brinolysis.
25,26
During pregnancy the incidence of all three factors is increased compared with the nonpregnant population,
placing parturients at higher risk ofVTE. hypoxemic and hypotensive shortly aer delivery. What are likely diagnoses at this time? Are there any exams you would perform to help narrow your diagnosis?
2. e patient becomes unresponsive, and cardiovascular collapse occurs. What are your next steps in management of this patient?
3. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is initiated. What additional monitoring and access would you obtain?
RISK FACTORS
e two most important risk factors for VTE are a previous history of thromboembolism and diagnosis of thrombo-
22,24,27
philia. lization, smoking, obesity, and cesarean delivery.
Other risk factors include antenatal immobi-
22– 24,28
Risk factors for the nonpregnant population also apply to preg­nant patients.
What laboratory evaluations would you obtain? If the patient appeared to be in right heart failure, how would your medical management dier?
4. You notice during resuscitation that there is oozing around the IV sites and surgeon notes continued oozing. What is the diagnosis? What laboratory abnormalities do you expect to see in early versus late disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)? What blood products would you administer?
5. Aer initial resuscitation in a massive AFE, the patient
DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS
ASSESSMENT (PRESENTING SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS)
e signs and symptoms of DVT are nonspecic and oen mimic normal symptoms of pregnancy, specically lower leg edema and pain. Uneven or unilateral lower extremity symptoms should prompt evaluation.
regains hemodynamic stability. Will you attempt extubation? Will you send her to the postanesthesia
MANAGEMENT
care unit (PACU)?
Compression ultrasonography of proximal veins is the initial recommended diagnostic test in the setting of new- onset symp-
THROMBOEMBOLISM
CASE
37YO G1P0 at 34 weeks presents to the emergency room with unilateral leg swelling, shortness of breath, and chestpain.
toms.29 If the test is negative, and involvement of the iliac vessels is not suspected, only routine surveillance is recommended. In the setting of high clinical suspicion with equivocal or nega­tive results, the clinician may opt for magnetic resonance imag­ing or presumptive anticoagulation.29 e - dimer test is not currently recommended for diagnosis of DVT in pregnancy, as baseline values in pregnancy are signicantly higher than
MECHANISM
in nonpregnant women.29 If a DVT is identied, therapeutic anticoagulation should be initiated.
Venous thromboembolic events (VTE) include both deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary thromboembo­lism (PTE). e incidence of pregnancy- related thrombo­embolic events is 1.0 to 1.7 events per 1,000 pregnancies.
e pathogenesis of VTE is described by Virchow’s triad:(1)venous stasis, (2)vascular damage, and (3)hyper­coagulability. Venocaval compression by the enlarg­ing uterus leads to venous stasis. Vascular damage to the
334 SECTION B. CARDIAC CRISES
PULMONARY THROMBOEMBOLISM
22– 24
ASSESSMENT (PRESENTING SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS)
Presenting signs and symptoms for PTE are shown in Table 47.2. Physical examination of the patient commonly
P
e
https://t.me/medicina_free
335
TABLE47.2 PHYSICAL FINDINGS INPULMONARY EMBOLISM
Finding Patients Affected (%)
Tachypnea 85
Tachycardia 40
Fever 45
Accentuated second heart sound 50
Localized rales 60
Thrombophlebitis 40
Supraventricular dysrhythmia 15
SOURCE:Modied from Spence TH. Pulmonary embolization syndrome. In:Civetta JM, Taylor
RW, Kirby RR, eds. Critical Care. Philadelphia:JB Lippincott; 1988:1091– 102.
PTE, compression ultrasonography should be performed to evaluate for DVT. If results are negative, further imaging is necessary. In the absence of signs or symptoms of DVT, a chest radiograph should be performed as a screening tool to exclude alternative diagnoses and guide further imaging. If the chest radiograph is normal, ventilation- perfusion (V/ Q) scanning or computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTA) should be performed.33 If the chest radiograph is abnormal, computed tomography CTA is preferred, as V/ Q scanning would likely be nondiagnostic.
TREATMENT FORTHROMBOEMBOLISM
If the V/ Q scan or CTA is positive, therapeutic anticoagu­lation should be initiated.29 Anticoagulation is usually initi-
reveals tachypnea, crackles, decreased breath sounds, and tachy­cardia. Evidence of a DVT generally accompanies the pulmo­nary or cardiovascular ndings.
30,31
Central venous monitoring may reveal an increased (>8mmHg) central venous pressure, a low to normal (<15mmHg) pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, and an increased mean pulmonary artery pressure.32 Although pulmonary shunt is a common feature of PTE, the diagnosis of PTE cannot be excluded on the basis of a normal PaO2.31 Pulmonary vascular resistance is oen increased, and patients should be monitored for right ventricular failure if the mean pulmonary artery pressure exceeds 35 to 45mmHg.32 Le ventricular failure may also occur secondary to poor le ventricular lling and arterial hypoxemia.
ated with either low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH). e American College of Chest Physicians recommends LMWH for prophylac­tic and therapeutic anticoagulation for pregnant women instead of UFH.34 e LMWH has an enhanced ratio of antithrombotic (anti– factor Xa) to anticoagulant (anti– factor IIa) activity than UFH and does not aect aPTT measurement.35 When LMWH is used for therapeutic anti­coagulation, dosing can be adjusted based on anti– factor Xa activity; the desired peak level is 0.6 to 1.0 U/ mL mea­sured 4 hours aer injection.
29
As the patient nears delivery, UFH therapy may be used to initiate, or maintain anticoagulation. Unfractionated heparin binds to antithrombin III and potentiates inac-
MANAGEMENT
An algorithm for the management of suspected PTE is shown in Figure 47.1.33 Initial steps include supplemental oxygen and hemodynamic support if necessary. If a patient has suspected
tivation of other coagulation factors, including throm­bin (IIa), factors Xa, XIIa, XIa, and IXa, and kallikrein. Unfractionated heparin is administered as a subcutaneous injection for both prophylactic and therapeutic therapy; however, intravenous therapy may be necessary in the
Figure47.1 Diagnostic algorithm for workup of suspected
pulmonary embolism during pregnancy. PE, pulmonary embolism; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; CXR, chest radiograph; CUS, compression ultrasonography; CTA, computed tomography pulmonary angiography; V/ Q scan, ventilation- perfusion scan. SOURCE:Adapted
from Leung AN, Bull TM, Jaeschke R, etal. An ofcial American Thoracic Society/ Society of Thoracic Radiology clinical practice guideline:evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. American Journal Respiratory and Critical Care
Medicine. 2011;184:1200– 8.
PERIPARTUM EMBOLISM 335
Suspected PE
DVT symptoms
Present Absent
CUS CXR
ositive
Treat
Negative
No
treatment
CTPA V/Q scan
PositivePositiveNegative
Treat
NormalAbnormal
Negativ
No
treatment
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025