Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 911 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
8 Мб
Скачать
296
https://t.me/medicina_free
leward due to elevation of the diaphragm. Finally, caval compression can occur depending on gestational age and positioning of the patient, thus impeding venous return and decreasing stroke volume. In the supine position, com­pression of the inferior vena cava (IVC) occurs at 20 weeks, but can potentially occur even earlier at 13 to 16 weeks.2 Aortic compression may occur as well, but that thought has been recently challenged by Higuchi etal.3 Intravenous (IV) catheter placement above the level of the diaphragm during resuscitation is recommended due to potential caval compression from the gravid uterus.
Respiratory physiologic changes in parturients include capillary engorgement and edema of the laryn­geal, nasal, and oropharyngeal mucosa, which is exag­gerated in preeclampsia. These changes potentially lead to more friability of the upper airway tissues as well as difficulty with airway management including mask ven­tilation. A relatively small endotracheal tube (ETT) (i.e., 6.0– 7.0 mm internal diameter) may be necessary for intubation. Both minute ventilation and oxygen con­sumption will also increase, but chest wall compliance and functional residual capacity decrease, which results in rapid hypoxemia after the onset ofapnea.
Gastrointestinal changes occur, leading to shiing of the intra- abdominal portion of the esophagus into the thorax with the upward displacement and rightward rotation of the stomach.2 Decreased lower esophageal sphincter tone during pregnancy added to decreased gastric and intestinal motility during labor and delivery may increase the risk for aspiration of gastric contents when airway reexes are lost during cardiac arrest.
Obstetric hemorrhage, both postpartum and antepartum, is one of the leading direct causes of maternal death, particu­larly in developing countries.6 e major source of peripar­tum hemorrhage is uterine atony. Other sources of signicant obstetric hemorrhage are uterine rupture, placental abruption with or without associated disseminated intravascular coagula­tion, HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets) syndrome, placenta previa, and abnormal implantation of the placenta as seen in placenta accreta, increta, and percreta. See “Severe Peripartum Hemorrhage” chapter for detailed discus­sion of these conditions.
Cardiovascular etiologies have been identied as the leading indirect cause of maternal mortality.8 is category includes sudden adult death syndrome (SADS); acute myo­cardial infarction, mostly related to ischemic heart disease; aortic dissection or rupture; congenital heart disease; pul­monary hypertension; and cardiomyopathy, specically peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM). e underlying pathophysiology of PPCM is unclear, but it has been asso­ciated with multiple risk factors such as older maternal age, multiparity, and hypertension, to name a few.9 See the “Peripartum Cardiomyopathy” chapter in this section for further explanation. e maternal mortality registry from the United Kingdom (UK) reported an increased inci­dence of mortality due to SADS and the presumed resul­tant death secondary to fatal arrhythmia when comparing the period of 2006– 2008 to earlier in the decade.8 And lastly, although the incidence of aortic dissection or rupture leading to cardiac arrest is incredibly low, chance of survival to hospital discharge is even lower.
5
Hypertensive disorders are another major contributor to worldwide maternal mortality.6 e classication of dis-
ETIOLOGY
orders falls the following:gestational hypertension, chronic hypertension, and preeclampsia with and without severe fea­tures. e subgroups of preeclamptic patients include those
In the United States, about 1 in 12,000 hospitalizations for delivery is complicated by maternal cardiac arrest; however, the leading causes of maternal cardiac arrest vary worldwide depending on region.
4,5,6
e World Health Organization (WHO) separates maternal cardiac arrest by direct obstet­ric and indirect causes. Direct causes include those result­ing from obstetric complications or interventions during pregnancy, labor, and puerperium; whereas indirect causes include cardiac arrest secondary to diseases that were preex­isting or disease states that were exacerbated by, but not due to, pregnancy. Amnemonic to quickly remember the eti­ologies for maternal cardiac arrest is “BEAU- CHOPS” as detailed in the American Heart Association (AHA) mater­nal cardiac arrest algorithm (Figure 42.1 and Table 42.2).
with (1)eclampsia, a condition with new- onset seizures due to central nervous system involvement, and (2) HELLP syndrome, a condition in which the patient develops hemo­lysis, elevated liver enzymes, and a low platelet count. See the chapter “Severe Preeclampsia” for detailed discussion.
Embolism is an important cause of maternal cardiac arrest. e two subtypes associated with fatal events are venous thromboembolism and amniotic uid embolism (AFE). romboembolism has been identied as one of the top three leading direct causes of maternal mortality.8 Pregnancy contrib­utes to an increased risk for the development of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) due to an increase in each of the factors of Virchow’s triad:hypercoagu-
7
lability, venous stasis, and vascular endothelial damage. e
296 SECTION A. MATERNAL COLLAPSE
Maternal Cardiac Arrest
https://t.me/medicina_free
297
First Responder
• Activate maternal cardiac arrest team
• Document time of onset of maternal cardiac arrest
• Place the patient supine
• Start chest compressions as per BLS algorithm; place hands slightly higher on sternum than usual
Subsequent Responders
Maternal Interventions
Treat per BLS and ACLS Algorithms
• Do not delay defibrillation
• Give typical ACLS drugs and doses
• Ventilate with 100% oxygen
• Monitor waveform capnography and CPR quality
• Provide post–cardiac arrest care as appropriate
Maternal Modifications
• Start IV above the diaphragm
• Assess for hypovolemia and give fluid bolus when required
• Anticipate difficult airway: experienced provider preferred for advanced airway placement
• If patient receiving IV/IO magnesium prearrest, stop magnesium and give IV/IO calcium chloride 10 mL in 10% solution, or calcium gluconate 30 mL in 10% solution
• Continue all maternal resuscitative interventions (CPR, positioning, defibrillation, drugs, and fluids) during and after cesarean section
Obstetric Interventions for Patinet With
an Obvisouly Gravid Uterus*
• Perform manual left uterine displacement (LUD)– displace uterus to the patient’s left to relieve aortocaval compression
• Remove both internal and external fetal monitors if present
Obstetric and neonatal teams should
immediately prepare for possible emergency
cesarean section
• If no ROSC by 4 minutes of resuscitative efforts, consider performing immedicate emergency cessarean section
• Aim for delivery within 5 minutes of onset of resuscitative efforts
*An obviously gravid uterus is a uterus that is deemed clinically to be sufficiently large to cause aortocaval compression
Search for and Treat Possible Contributing Factors
Figur e4 2.1 AHA modications for maternal cardiac arrest. © 2010 American Heart Association
Bleeding/DIC Embolism: coronary/pulmonary/amniotic fluid embolism Anesthetic complications Uterine atony Cardiac disease (MI/ischemia/aortic dissection/cardiomyopathy) Hypertension/preeclampsia/eclampsia Other: differential diagnosis of standard ACLS guidelines Placenta abruptio/previa Sepsis
location of DVTs in pregnant patients is usually proximal in the iliac or femoral veins compared with the distal calf vessels in nonpregnant patients.10 e other main embolic phenomenon that causes maternal cardiac arrest, AFE, is not a true embolic event, but rather a systemic inammatory response to the intro­duction of a fetal antigen into the maternal circulation. is condition initially presents as acute respiratory distress, agita­tion, cardiovascular instability, dysrhythmias, and seizure, and may lead to subsequent coagulopathy and hemorrhage. In the UK data registry, it was reported that AFE has a case fatality of 19% and 7% of the surviving women have permanent neuro­logical injury.11 Lastly, although venous air embolism (VAE) occurs frequently during cesarean deliveries, the majority of these events are subclinical. However, in the rare instance of massive VAE there is the potential for cardiovascular collapse
(BEAU-CHOPS)
and cardiac arrest. For an extended discussion, refer to the “Peripartum Embolism” chapter.
Even in developed nations, sepsis continues to play an important role in maternal mortality. As described by the Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries (CMACE), while overall maternal mortality rate has decreased, the mortal­ity rate related to sepsis, particularly genital tract sepsis, is increasing.8 Community- acquired group A streptococcus appears to be the main culprit in thesecases.
Finally, other less frequent indirect causes of maternal mortality include a broad range of disease states spanning neurological complications, such as epilepsy, intracranial hemorrhage, or cerebral thrombosis; asthma; psychiatric diseases; trauma; and diabetes mellitus, related to severe hypoglycemic episodes. e less frequent direct causes of
OBSTETRIC LIFE SUPPORT 297
298
https://t.me/medicina_free
TABLE42.2 COMMON CAUSES OFMATERNAL ARREST
AND MATERNAL MORTALITY
Category Specic Etiologies
and delivery care team— anesthesiology and the obstet­ric and neonatal resuscitation teams.13 Ideal components of a maternal cardiac arrest team are seen in Table 42.3. Simultaneously, high- quality basic life support (BLS)
Maternal Hemorrhage (uterine atony, placental abnormalities,
placental abruption, retained products of conception, uterine rupture, coagulopathy, surgical bleeding, intracranial bleeding)
Maternal chronic disease state (congenital heart
disease, valvular disease, cardiomyopathy, arrhythmia, aortic dissection, myocardial infarction)
Maternal acute disease state (trauma, suicide,
arrhythmia, aortic dissection, myocardial infarction, pulmonary thromboembolism, amniotic uid embolism, venous air embolism, cerebrovascular/ intracranial event, sepsis, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy)
should be initiated as soon as possible in order to maximize resuscitative eorts. While there is value in gathering many care team members to the bedside, the code should be led by someone who is familiar with the physiologic changes of pregnancy and implications for resuscitation.14 While initial life support measures are started, any precipitating causes for arrest should be actively investigated and treated.
PATIENT POSITIONING
Due to potential aortocaval compression in gravid patients
Drug- related Anaphylaxis/ allergic reaction
Intentional drug overdose (illicitdrugs) Accidental drug overdose/ drug error (high risk with
oxytocin, magnesium, insulin)
Anesthesia­related
SOURCE:Adapted from AHA 2015 Guidelines on Cardiac Arrest in Pregnancy.
Neuraxial block (high spinal/ epidural, severe
hypotension) Airway (failed intubation/ loss of airway, aspiration) Local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST)
14
greater than 20 weeks in the supine position, following maternal arrest it is recommended to relieve this obstruc­tion by one of two methods:le- lateral tilt or manual le uterine displacement.7 Ideal position to relieve aortocaval compression is full le lateral decubitus, but at least 30 degrees is likely needed. Twenty weeks’ gestation can be roughly estimated to be a fundal height at the level of the umbilicus. Positioning of patients not in cardiac arrest in le lateral decubitus has also been shown to be important
maternal death include anesthetic complications related to local anesthetic systemic toxicity, failed intubation, aspira­tion of gastric contents, or high neuraxial block as well as magnesium toxicity and anaphylaxis.
for both improved maternal stroke volume and fetal non­stress test outcomes.15 Figure 42.3 illustrates the 30° le­lateral tilt with a board under the patient.
7
However, performing compressions in the tilt position
may lead to inadequate chest compressions with decreased
MANAGEMENT OFRESUSCITATION
Although there are no randomized controlled trials com­paring the ecacy of standard ACLS protocol to the modied ACLS protocol in pregnant patients, the scien­tic reasoning for the modications to account for physi­ologic changes of pregnancy has been published.7 Figure
force or the patient sliding o the board if the angle is greater than 30°.16 When chest compressions are required, the American Heart Association recommends supine posi­tion14 and manual le uterine displacement with one or two hands, as illustrated in Figure 42.4.
7,14,17
Using the manual displacement technique, the provider should ideally dis­place the uterus leward and upward toward the ceiling to relieve aortocaval compression.
42.2 describes the standard algorithm for pulseless electri­cal activity (PEA)/ asystole and pulseless ventricular tachy­cardia/ brillation; whereas Figure 42.1, delineates the modied algorithm for maternal cardiac arrest.
12,7
Notable
adaptations are explainedbelow.
INITIATE BASIC LIFE SUPPORT AND ACTIVATE OBSTETRIC CODETEAM
Initially, when the pregnant woman is found to be in car­diac arrest, a “Code OB” (i.e., a clearly identied obstetric­oriented code team response) should be called in order to rapidly gather the normal code team as well as labor
CIRCULATION
Chest compressions should be hard (about 5cm depth) and fast (at least 100 per min) with minimal interrup­tions and full chest recoil between compressions.
12,13,14
If the patient is intubated, compressions are to be con­tinuous, only to be briefly interrupted for pulse checks, provider rotation, and defibrillation. If the parturient is not intubated, 2 breaths should follow each cycle of 30 chest compressions. The AHA modification for pregnancy previously recommended that hand place­ment on the sternum should be about 2 to 3cm higher
298 SECTION A. MATERNAL COLLAPSE
https://t.me/medicina_free
299
Figur e4 2.2 ACLS algorithm for PEA/ asystole and pulselessVT/ VF.
in third- trimester patients compared with nonpreg­nant patients as a result of cephalad cardiac displace­ment secondary to diaphragmatic elevation by the gravid uterus,7 however the 2015 update states that the evidence for this is poor and recommends hand placement on the center of the patient’s chest over the lower half of the sternum.14 If resources allow, use of
OBSTETRIC LIFE SUPPORT 299
continuous capnography allows providers to assess the adequacy of chest compressions as well as confirm cor­rect placement of the endotracheal tube. Intravenous or intraosseous access should ideally be obtained above the diaphragm to potentially avoid any increase in cir­culation time that may occur from IVC compression in the gravid patient.
300
https://t.me/medicina_free
TABLE42.3 IDEAL TEAM MEMBERS FORA
DEDICATED MATERNAL CARDIAC ARRESTTEAM
Team Composition
Adult resuscitation team
Obstetrics 1 obstetrician, 1 obstetric nurse
Anesthesiology Obstetric anesthesiologist (if available) or
Neonatology 1 physician, 1 nurse, 1 neonatal respiratory
The American Heart Association supports development of dedicated teams in centers with
labor and delivery units. In facilities without obstetric or neonatal services, contingency
plans should be in place in the event of a maternal cardiac arrest.
SOURCE:Adapted from AHA 2015 Guidelines on Cardiac Arrest in Pregnancy
Critical care physicians/ nurses and/ or emergency physicians/ nurses, respiratory therapist or equivalent, pharmacist or equivalent
staff anesthesiologist, anesthesia assistant or certied nurse anesthetist if available
therapist or equivalent
14
14
Figur e4 2.4 Two- handed manual left uterine displacement.
given the risk of a full stomach situation and potential dif-
AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
Maternal oxygenation and ventilation is a priority during obstetric basic life support (OBLS). e anesthesiologist should prepare for airway management at the start of resus­citation eorts, and hypoxia should always be considered as a possible cause of cardiac arrest.14 Prior to intubation, eective ventilation with 100% oxygen is ideal; however, signicant upper- airway obstruction may occur due to pha­ryngeal mucosal edema that may require jaw thrust, oral airways, or nasal airways during bag- mask ventilation. Due to nasopharyngeal capillary engorgement in pregnancy, oral airways are preferable to nasal airways, and repeated airway manipulations should be avoided.13 If possible, an
cult intubation in parturients. As in standard ACLS, the establishment of an airway should not interrupt chest com­pressions, and in the event that endotracheal intubation is dicult, placement of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for oxygenation and ventilation should be considered while readying to obtain more denitive, secure airway. Lastly, cricoid pressure may not be eective in preventing aspira­tion; therefore, the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology (SOAP) does not recommend its routine use.13 See “Dicult Airway: Special Considerations in Pregnancy” chapter for more discussion of the obstetric airway. It must be reinforced that periods of apnea in preg­nancy lead to rapid onset of hypoxemia that can contribute to worsened fetal hypoxia and acidosis.
experienced provider should attempt airway management,
DEFIBRILLATION
Figur e4 2.3 Left lateral tilt using back board for support.
300 SECTION A. MATERNAL COLLAPSE
While performing CPR, debrillation should be readied in the event of a shockable rhythm (i.e., pulseless ventricular tachycardia or brillation). e energy requirement used to perform an electrical shock in pregnancy is no dierent from that which would be used in the same scenario in non­pregnancy.7 Additionally, removing fetal scalp electrodes and external fetal monitors to prevent theoretical electri­cal burns for the fetus and mother is reasonable, but should never be the reason to delay debrillation if appropriate.
MEDICATIONS
13
ere are no contraindications to using any of the medica­tions in the current ACLS algorithms during ALCS in a preg­nant patient. Similarly, there is no evidence to support dose
https://t.me/medicina_free
301
adjustment of resuscitation medication during maternal car­diac arrest.7 Although the volume of distribution and clearance of drugs dier due to physiologic changes in pregnancy, these pharmacokinetic changes may have little to no impact during the low- ow cardiac output state of maternal cardiac arrest.
If the patient was receiving magnesium prior to the maternal arrest, the magnesium infusion should be dis­continued and calcium should be administered to combat potential contribution from magnesium toxicity leading to
is based on one case report of a woman at 13 weeks gestation who arrested without PMCD and underwent post– cardiac arrest hypothermia, who eventually went on to have a term delivery with favorable maternal and fetal outcomes.7 Patients
13
undergoing therapeutic hypothermia should be evaluated for the utility of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring due to the risk for fetal bradycardia. Even in nonviable fetuses, heart rate monitoring may help guide maternal supportive care to opti­mize intrauterine fetal resuscitation.
cardiac arrest.
PERIMORTEM CESAREAN DELIVERY
In gravid patients without ROSC, who have a uterine fundal height at the level of or above the umbilicus, peri­mortem cesarean delivery (PMCD) is a measure that may improve maternal and fetal outcomes. Ideally, provid­ers should strive to perform PMCD within 5 minutes of maternal arrest.7 is means that incision should be made
CONCLUSION
While there are many barriers to successful maternal resus­citation, if the patient survives this initial arrest, the like­lihood of survival to hospital discharge is much higher compared with other patient populations.3 As with other rare clinical events, simulation and team training can help providers prepare for and maintain competence in maternal
cardiac arrest algorithms. at 4 minutes in order to deliver the fetus by 5 minutes if ROSC has not occurred, regardless of fetal viability. Acase series in women who underwent PMCD noted sudden and dramatic improvement in maternal response to resus-
SUMMARY OFESSENTIALS OFMATERNAL RESUSCITATION
citation, including ROSC, upon emptying of the uterus in 12 of 20 women.18 It is plausible that delivery of the fetus improves quality of chest compressions, increases venous return, decreases oxygen consumption, and improves pul­monary mechanics in the mother.13 Fetal delivery within 5 minutes optimizes neonatal outcomes; however, neonatal survival has been documented with delivery times up to 30 minutes aer onset of maternal arrest.
7,18,19
Even in the ideal simulated conditions in which provid­ers knew they were being timed, meeting the goals listed above is extremely challenging. One study revealed only 14% of teams made incision for PMCD by 4 minutes following maternal cardiac
19,20
arrest.
Authors found that transporting to the operating room instead of performing the PMCD at the site of arrest (in the labor and delivery [L&D] room) nearly doubled the time to incision19 and is associated with decreased quality of chest compressions.21 us, the AHA recommends providers perform PMCD at the site of arrest if it occurs on the labor and delivery oor, emergency medicine department, or ICU.14 Amore extensive discussion of perimortem cesarean delivery can be found in the “Perimortem Cesarean Delivery for Maternal Cardiac Arrest” chapter.
“Code OB” or “OB Rapid Response” should activate the usual hospital code teams along with anesthesiology and the obstetric and neonatal resuscitationteams
C- A- B- U=Circulation— Airway— Breathing— Uterus
Leward displacement of the uterus is required, preferably with manual displacement and supine positioning during chest compressions
Hand placement is on the center of the chest over the lower half of sternum during chest compressions
IV placement above the diaphragm
Expert provider should anticipate the potential for more challenging airway management, smaller ETT may be needed for intubation
Fetal assessment should not be performed during maternal resuscitation and fetal monitors should be removed/ detached as soon as possible. However, removal of fetal monitors should not delay shock or debrillation if appropriate.
POST– CARDIAC ARRESTCARE
e current AHA guidelines recommend that therapeutic hypothermia can be considered for the pregnant patient aer cardiac arrest, on a case- by- case basis. is recommendation
If patient is on magnesium prior to arrest, stop the infusion, and administer calcium
In gravid patients with a uterine fundus palpable at or above the umbilicus, early preparation should be made
OBSTETRIC LIFE SUPPORT 301
302
https://t.me/medicina_free
for PMCD in anticipation of incision at 4 minutes and neonatal delivery at 5 minutes aer onset of cardiacarrest
May consider, on an individual basis, therapeutic hypothermia for comatose pregnant patient withROSC
CASE- BASED LEARNING DISCUSSION
1. What would the dierential for the cause of cardiac
arrest be in the case above? And what is the most likely cause of the arrest?
2. What are current treatments for amniotic uid
embolism?
3. How would you treat cardiac arrest associated with
local anesthetic systemic toxicity in pregnancy?
4. Are there any concerns for using amiodarone,
lidocaine, or other antiarrhythmics for the treatment of arrhythmias in pregnant patients?
5. Why is the timing for a PMCD important?
6. How would the resuscitation have diered if the arrest
occurred prior to delivery of thefetus?
REFERENCES
1. Cohen SE, Andes LC, Carvalho B. Assessment of knowledge
regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation of pregnant women. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. 2008;17:20– 25.
2. Gaiser R . Physiologic changes of pregnancy. In:Chestnut DH, Wong
CA, Tsen LC, etal. eds. Chestnut’s Obstetric Anesthesia:Principles and Practice. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA:Elsevier; 2014:15– 38.
3. Higuchi H, Takagi S, Zhang K, Furui I, Ozaki M. Eect of lateral
tilt angle on the volume of the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava in pregnant and nonpregnant women determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Anesthesiology. 2015;122(2):286– 93.
4. McCown A, McKay RF. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in preg-
nancy. In: Santos AC, Epstein JN, Chaudhuri K, eds. Obstetric Anesthesia. NewYork, NY:McGraw- Hill;2015.
5. Mhyre JM, Tsen LC, Einav S, Kuklina EV, Leert LR, Bateman
BT. Cardiac arrest during hospitalization for delivery in the United States, 1998– 2011. Anesthesiology. 2014;120(4):810– 8.
6. Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, etal. WHO analysis of causes of mater­nal death:a systematic review. Lancet. 2006;367:1066– 74.
7. Vanden Hoek TL, Morrison LJ, Shuster M, etal. Part12:Cardiac arrest in special situations:2010 American Heart Association guide­lines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascu­lar care. Circulation. 2010;122:S833– 8.
8. Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries (CMACE). Saving mothers’ lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006– 08. e Eighth report on condential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2011;118(Suppl. 1):1– 203.
9. Givertz MM. Cardiology patient page:peripartum cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2013;127:e622– 6.
10. Chan WS, Spencer FA, Ginsberg JS. Anatomic distribution of deep vein thrombosis in pregnancy. CMAJ. 2010;182:657– 60.
11. Fitzpatrick K, Tunell D, Kurinczuk J, Knight M. Incidence, risk factors, management and outcomes of amniotic- uid embolism:a population- based cohort and nested case- control study. BJOG.
2015. doi:10.1111/ 1471–0528.13300
12. Neumar RW, Otto CW, Kronick SL, etal. Part8:Adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency car­diovascular care. Circulation. 2010;122:S729– 67.
13. Lipman S, Cohen S, Einav S, et al. e Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology consensus statement on the management of cardiac arrest in pregnancy. Anesth Analg. 2014;118(5):1003– 16.
14. Jeejeebhoy FM, Zelop CM, Lipman S, et al.; on behalf of the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee, Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation, Council on Cardiovascular Diseases in the Young, and Council on Clinical Cardiology. Cardiac arrest in pregnancy:a scientic statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;132:1747– 73.
15. Tamás, P, Szilágyi, A, Jeges, S, et al. Eects of maternal central hemodynamics on fetal heart rate patterns. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2007;86(6):711– 4.
16. Rees GA, Willis BA. Resuscitation in late pregnancy. Anaesthesia. 1988;43(5):347– 9.
17. Kundra P, Khanna S, Habeebullah S, Ravishankar M. Manual dis­placement of the uterus during caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 2007;62(5):460– 5.
18. Katz V, Balderston K, DeFreest M. Perimortem cesarean deliv­ery: were our assumptions correct? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(6):1916– 20.
19. Dijkman A, Huisman CM, Smit M, etal. Cardiac arrest in preg­nancy:increasing use of perimortem caesarean section due to emer­gency skills training? BJOG. 2010;117(3):282– 7.
20. Lipman S, Daniels K, Cohen SE, Carvalho B. Labor room set­ting compared with the operating room for simulated perimortem cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(5):1090– 4.
21. Lipman SS, Wong JY, Arafeh J, Cohen SE, Carvalho B. Transport decreases the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during simu­lated maternal cardiac arrest. Anesth Analg. 2013;116:162– 7.
302 SECTION A. MATERNAL COLLAPSE
https://t.me/medicina_free
303
43.
PERIMORTEM CESAREAN DELIVERY FORMATERNAL CARDIACARREST
Benjamin Cobb and StevenLipman
CLINICALCASE
and gods whose births occurred miraculously with their
mother dying in childbirth.” In general, PMCD is part of A 38- year- old term parturient in active labor reports acute onset shortness of breath in the labor room. Shortly there­aer she becomes unresponsive and an adult code for car­diac arrest is activated by the labor nurse. e anesthesia provider arrives as the primary nurse is transferring the role of chest compressions to anothernurse.
MATERNAL CARDIACARREST
medical lore, and the utility of this procedure was debated
throughout the 19th century, given the preponderance
of maternal death in childbirth (2%– 4% at that time).
4,5
Physician skepticism about fetal survival aer such eorts6
and the ecacy of CPR in pregnancy prevented widespread
consideration of PMCD as a potential resuscitative maneu-
ver for the parturient until more recently.
4
Evolving obstetric practices and patient demographics inuenced the role of PMCD in maternal/ fetal resuscita­tion. A population- based study from 1998– 2011 high-
Resuscitation in the setting of maternal cardiac arrest requires multiple modications to account for the anatomic and physiologic changes of pregnancy. e impact of these changes on the success of maternal resuscitation is a topic of ongoing inquiry. Current American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for cardiac arrest in pregnancy include
lights a shi in the underlying causes of maternal cardiac arrest in the United States from maternal sepsis and dehy­dration in the 1800s6 to hemorrhage, heart failure, and thromboembolic disease.7 As infection became a less fre­quent cause of maternal death (Table 43.1) and women increasingly labored in settings where emergency care was
immediate activation of the cardiac arrest and neonatal teams, chest compressions rendered on a supine patient with manual uterine displacement, rapid debrillation if applicable, ventilation with 100% oxygen, and use of wave-
TABLE43.1 CHANGING CAUSES OFMATERNAL DEATH
INCASES WITHSURVIVING INFANTS INTHE SETTING OFPERIMORTEM CESAREAN DELIVERY
6
form capnography if available to assess quality of cardio­pulmonary resuscitation (CPR). If these interventions fail to result in a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) within 4 minutes, emergent cesarean delivery might be life- saving for both mother and fetus.
1,2
Unfortunately, up
to one- third of pregnant women remain undelivered at the
Years
1879– 1956 HTN Diseases 39
Causes of Maternal Death
Infection 37
Other 24
Percent
time of death.3 Advanced life support during pregnancy is covered in depth in a subsequent chapter.
1956– 1970 HTN Diseases 23
Infection 9
HISTORY OFPERIMORTEM CESAREAN DELIVERY
e role of a perimortem cesarean delivery (PMCD) in maternal resuscitation has evolved over time. Katz writes, “almost all ancient mythologies have references to heroes
Anesthesia 18
Embolism 18
Cardiac 16
Other 16
303
304
https://t.me/medicina_free
readily available, the ecacy of a PMCD as a resuscita­tive maneuver was reconsidered. is culminated in the American Heart Association’s adoption of PMCD into the 1986 algorithm for maternal cardiac arrest
4,8
(Figure43.1).
patients, but even optimal chest compressions during CPR in the later stages of pregnancy may only result in 10% of normal CO.
4,9,10
e gravid uterus (>20 weeks gestation) may contribute to this observed decrease in CO by impair­ing blood return to the heart secondary to inferior vena cava
PHYSIOLOGIC BASIS OFPERIMORTEM CESAREAN DELIVERY
(IVC) compression in the supine position.2 e decrease in preload can be compounded by increased aerload due to aortic compression, again by the gravid uterus.
Le uterine tilt, a technique widely used in pregnant Perimortem cesarean delivery has a broad physiologic impact. e ultimate goal during maternal resuscitative eorts is maintenance of adequate cerebral blood ow and restoration of spontaneous circulation to avoid a hypoxic neurologic injury. Cardiac output (CO) during superb CPR is approximately 30% of normal in nonpregnant
women to avoid the phenomenon of uterine aortocaval compression, may further compromise cardiac output by aecting the ecacy of chest compressions.2 Arecent study suggests a quite signicant degree of tilt may be necessary to alleviate hemodynamic compromise from the uterus.11 Providers may not be able to generate adequate chest
Figur e4 3.1 Cardiac arrest in pregnancy in- hospital (ACLS) algorithm. SOURCE:Reprinted with permission. Circulation. 2015;132:1747– 73. ©2015 American Heart
Association,Inc.
304 SECTION A. MATERNAL COLLAPSE
https://t.me/medicina_free
305
compressions not only due to the angle of tilt but also the lack of a rm surface behind the patient. In addition, the le tilt may have ramications on establishing airway control and upper extremity venous access, which limits oxygen­ation of the patient and delivery of resuscitation medica­tions. Evacuation of the uterus may relieve IVC and aortic compression, eliminating the need for le uterine displace­ment and improving the ecacy of chest compressions and likelihood of adequate cerebral perfusion.
Maternal neurologic injury from anoxia occurs aer approximately 5 minutes.6 Pregnancy incrementally increases both maternal metabolic rate and oxygen con­sumption and reduces pulmonary functional residual capacity (FRC), all of which increase the risk of maternal hypoxemia. e presence of the placenta and fetus further deplete maternal oxygen content. While the fetal metabo­lism is down- regulated in the setting of maternal compro­mise, maternal cardiac arrest is not surprisingly associated with a high fetal mortality rate.12 Uterine evacuation may contribute to improved maternal oxygenation by decreasing overall metabolic demands, improving FRC and permitting improved positive pressure ventilation, and increased car-
Activation of a “code blue” immediately upon recogni­tion of maternal cardiac arrest is essential to ensure delivery of the fetus within 5 minutes (or earlier). e “maternal code blue” responders should include a provider capable of per­forming PMCD and the adult code team, as well as a neona­tal intensive care (NICU) team.
2,14
Essential equipment, as listed in Box 43.1, for delivery of the neonate should be imme­diately available. While the guidelines recommend starting a PMCD at 4 minutes to facilitate delivery by 5 minutes given the incremental risk of maternal anoxic brain injury, wait­ing to perform a PMCD is not mandated. Delivery may be initiated in the absence of a return of spontaneous circula­tion earlier than 4 minutes aer initial resuscitative mea­sures based on clinical circumstances and the discretion of the team.
15,16
Both vertical and Pfannenstiel incisions have been reported in the literature, and the quickest approach should be employed.
4,8
Alternatively, vaginal delivery may be considered at the discretion of the provider, but should take place within the same guidelines to maximize maternal/ fetal outcomes.14 In the event of successful ROSC, hemostasis, analgesia, and anxiolysis may be necessary; disposition to the intensive care unit should be arranged.
diac output and oxygen delivery. Delivery of the fetus also allows the neonatal team to begin resuscitative measures. In this circumstance, PMCD in a timely manner may physi­ologically lend itself to both maternal and fetal survival.
4,8
REFLECTIONS ONMODERN PERIMORTEM CESAREAN DELIVERY
PERIMORTEM CESAREAN DELIVERY LOGISTICS
e ecacy of performing a PMCD in the published lit­erature is limited to case reports/ series, given the rarity of the event. Katz etal. performed a literature review from 1986– 2004 of maternal cardiac arrest and found 38 cases of
e 2013 AHA guidelines recommend consideration of emergency PMCD when maternal hemodynamics are impacted due to uterine aortocaval compression regardless of gestational age and fetal viability.2 Twenty weeks of gesta­tional age is commonly accepted as the point where aortocaval compression may hinder maternal resuscitative eorts, while in most states a fetus is not considered viable until 23– 24 weeks gestational age. e exact gestational age at which aor­tocaval compression becomes relevant remains unclear, may vary by patient even prior to 20 weeks13 and in situations such as polyhydramnios and multiple gestation, where the uterine volume is greater than otherwise expected.14 Approximation of gestational age may be attempted by palpating the fundal height (20 weeks corresponding with a periumbilical fundal level), albeit unreliable, especially in the chaotic setting of maternal cardiac arrest.
1,2,4
us, when in doubt about gesta­tional age, err on the side of le uterine displacement and the consideration of PMCD if maternal resuscitation is required.
PMCD. In this review, the most common causes of mater­nal cardiac arrest were trauma, cardiac disease, and embolic disease. Of 20 cases with potentially reversible causes, 13/20 reported maternal survival to discharge. Twelve cases out of 18 documenting hemodynamic status demonstrated return of maternal pulse and blood pressure following cesarean delivery. In addition, 30/ 38 PMCDs reported the delivery of a surviving infant (all between 25 and 42 weeks gestation). e author concluded that PMCD is strongly supported “within 4 minutes of maternal cardiac arrest if resuscitation is ineective” and in no case was maternal hemodynamic status worsened aer PMCD.
16
More recently, Dijkman et al. performed an impact assessment in the Netherlands of the Managing Obstetric Emergencies and Trauma (MOET) course that included maternal and neonatal outcomes from 1993 to 2008 in the setting of a PMCD. Twelve PMCDs of 55 maternal cardiac arrests were included in the analysis (29– 40 weeks
PERIMORTEM CESAREAN DELIVERY 305
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025