Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 911 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
8 Мб
Скачать
356
https://t.me/medicina_free
an emergency hemostasis panel that the laboratory to pro­vided results within 15 minutes.
24
Pharmacologic therapy such as antibrinolytic agents and recombinant factor VIIa are used with caution in postpartum patients because of the risk of thrombotic events. Because bri­nolysis is commonly seen during severe PPH, there has been
Ruptured ectopic pregnancy
Postpartum:
Uterine inversion
Uterineatony
interest in the use of tranexamic acid for hemorrhage preven­tion and treatment. Several small trials have shown benet in reducing blood loss during vaginal delivery and cesarean deliv-
ANTEPARTUM MATERNAL HEMORRHAGE
ery without an increase in the incidence of adverse events.25 ere are wide variations in dosing, but most studies have administered 1 gram intravenously over approximately 10 minutes. Alarge, multicenter international randomized, con­trolled trial is currently underway.
26
Recombinant Factor VIIa (NovoSeven) has become an accepted treatment option in massive transfusion protocols for obstetric patients. Registries in Europe27 and in Australia and New Zealand28 have reported on large series of women who received recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) as an o- label indication during severe postpartum hemor­rhage. Both series found positive response rates of about 80% aer one dose with few side eects, although both series had cases with subsequent thrombosis and throm­bosis and embolism remain a concern in all parturients. Additionally, its use in AFE syndrome has been challenged. A case series of 44 reports of AFE compared those who received rFVIIa to those who did not and found the risk of death or permanent disability was doubled when rFVIIa was given.29 During AFE, high circulating tissue factor con­centrations can combine with rFVIIa to form intravascular clots. Although there are methodologic problems with this type of study, the results are concerning. Because postpro­cedure thromboembolism is a major concern, thrombopro­phylaxis is recommended once bleeding risk islow.
SPECIFIC OBSTETRIC CONDITIONS LEADING
TOSEVERE PERIPARTUM HEMORRHAGE
ABNORMAL PLACENTATION:PLACENTA PREVIA/ ACCRETA/ PERCRETA
A clear understanding of the risk factors, diagnosis, and management of antepartum hemorrhage is necessary for all practicing anesthesia providers. ese are discussed below.
Risk Factors
Risk factors for abnormal placentation include uterine scar­ring from prior cesarean delivery or myomectomy, uterine broids, history of postpartum hemorrhage, and multipar­ity. Aplacenta previa exists when all or part of the placenta lies over the cervical os in front of the fetal presenting part. Placenta accreta (78% of accreta cases) is an abnormally adherent placenta in which chorionic villi attach to the myometrium. ere are three grades of placenta accreta, depending on depth of invasion. Aplacenta increta (17% of cases) has grown into the myometrium, while a placenta percreta (5% of cases) has grown through the myometrium and uterine serosa with or without invasion into other pel­vic structures such as bladder, bowel or vasculature.
e greatest risk for placenta accreta is placenta previa in the presence of prior cesarean delivery. e risk is highly related to the number of previous uterine scars (usually cesar­ean sections) in the presence of a placenta previa.30 As the number of prior cesarean deliveries goes up, a woman with a placenta previa also faces increasing maternal morbidity from coagulopathy, hysterectomy, thromboembolism, and
Obstetric hemorrhage can occur antepartum or postpartum, so in some cases both mother and fetus are at risk. e follow­ing conditions contribute to peripartum hemorrhage, and are
pulmonary edema31 (Table 50.3). Perinatal morbidity is not aected, although known diagnosis of abnormal placenta­tion may lead to a planned late preterm delivery.
discussed in terms of their etiology or risk factors, diagnosis, obstetric management, and anesthetic considerations.
Antepartum:
Abnormal placentation:previa, accreta, and percreta
Placental abruption
Uterine rupture
Diagnosis
Placenta previa usually presents as painless vaginal bleeding in the third trimester. e rst episode of bleeding is oen mild (a “sentinel” bleed), but subsequent bleeds may be catastrophic. e presence of placenta previa in the setting of prior cesarean delivery should prompt further workup
356 SECTION B. CARDIAC CRISES
https://t.me/medicina_free
357
TABLE50.3 IN THEPRESENCE OFPLACENTA PREVIA,
THEASSOCIATION OFPRIOR CESAREAN DELIVERY WITHPLACENTA ACCRETA
Number of Prior Cesarean Deliveries
0 3% 15%
1 11% 23%
2 40% 59%
3 61% 83%
34,35
Risk of Placenta Accreta
Composite Maternal Morbidity
Anesthetic Management
e anesthetic management of placenta previa includes:
evaluation of the airway in case emergency general anesthesia is required,
large bore IV access (preferably two 18- or 16- gauge catheters),
having a Level 1 or equivalent uid warmer available,and
verifying that cross- matched blood is available in the
for placenta accreta and preparation for potentially massive
BloodBank.
hemorrhage at the time of delivery.
Placenta accreta may be diagnosed aer delivery when the placenta does not separate normally at vaginal or cesar­ean delivery, but there are usually characteristic antepar­tum ultrasound ndings.32 However one report found that when ultrasounds from patients with clinically diagnosed placenta accrete were given to blinded but experienced cli­nicians, there was a false negative rate of 18.3%.33 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be helpful if ultrasound is inconclusive or if placenta percreta is suspected.
34
ere is no evidence that regional anesthesia should be avoided during cesarean delivery for placenta previa. Two retrospective reviews of 514 and 350 cases of placenta pre­via found regional anesthesia was associated with reduced blood loss and reduced need for transfusion compared to general anesthesia.
38,39
Conversion from regional to gen­eral anesthesia was only required for inadequate duration of two spinal anesthetics during hysterectomy for placenta accreta.
e most important aspect of anesthetic manage-
Obstetric Management
Once placenta previa is diagnosed by ultrasound, an elec­tive cesarean delivery will be scheduled. If the fetus is immature, the patient may be managed expectantly in the hospital until the fetus has documented lung maturity or further bleeding occurs. Active labor or persistent bleeding will require an urgent trip to the operatingroom.
e management of placenta accreta or percreta at delivery requires early recognition by the obstetrician and a prompt decision to proceed with hysterectomy. Leaving the placenta in situ without hysterectomy is a less commonly used approach.35 is technique has unpredictable results and requires close follow- up because of the risk of infec­tion or further bleeding, but may be life- saving if the patient refuses blood transfusion or adequate blood products are not available. Acomparison of one institution’s experience with
ment of placenta accreta or percreta is awareness of risk factors and communication with the obstetrics team, ini­tially in the form of a multidisciplinary care conference that involves nursing and other surgical consultants.40 Small hospitals or institutions with insucient resources should consider patient transfer to a tertiary perinatal care
36
center.
e risk of major blood loss in these cases necessitates large bore IV access, arterial line placement, a pressure/ warming rapid infusion system, availability of cross- matched blood with the ability to institute a massive transfusion pro­tocol, and additional personnel to assist with resuscitation if needed.41 Hysterectomy and massive transfusion will usu­ally require general endotracheal anesthesia. If the woman is highly motivated to be awake to see her newborn, the case can be started using a neuraxial technique with general anesthesia induced aer delivery.
immediate hysterectomy with the placenta in situ versus leav­ing both placenta and uterus in situ found that conservative therapy reduced the hysterectomy rate from 85% to 15%, the transfusion rate by half, and coagulopathy from 39% to 5%,
PLACENTAL ABRUPTION
Etiology
but 15% of patients in the conservative group developed sep­sis.36 Hysterectomy with placenta le in situ remains the treat­ment of choice.36 Management of placenta percreta usually requires a multispecialty surgical team and potentially inter­ventional radiology with delivery in a hybrid operating suite.
Known risk factors for abruption include hypertension, advanced age and parity, smoking, cocaine use, abdominal trauma, premature rupture of membranes, and history of
37
previous abruption.
SEVERE PERIPARTUM HEMORRHAGE 357
358
https://t.me/medicina_free
Diagnosis
Diagnosis
As the placenta separates from the decidua, bleeding occurs from the exposed vessels, and fetal distress develops because there is less area for maternal- fetal gas exchange. Although the classic presentation is vaginal bleeding with uterine ten­derness, hypertonicity and fetal distress, the presentation can be extremely variable.
In the appropriate clinical setting, uterine rupture should be suspected when there is fetal distress, maternal shoul­der pain (due to blood in the abdomen irritating the dia­phragm), vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain between contractions and unrelieved by epidural analgesia, loss of fetal station or change in fetal presenting part, sudden maternal hemodynamic instability, or cessation of uterine
Obstetric Management
Initial management includes evaluation of fetal well- being,
contractions on an intrauterine pressure catheter (IUPC). Pain is not a sensitive indicator, and fetal distress is the most
common presentingsign. placement of large- bore intravenous lines, type- and­crossmatch of blood products, and obtaining maternal hematocrit and coagulation studies. e maternal risks of abruption are signicant hemorrhage and coagulopathy, while fetal risks include hypoxia and prematurity. Although delivery of the fetus is the denitive treatment, the route of delivery and timing varies. Severe fetal distress or maternal hemodynamic instability necessitates urgent cesarean deliv­ery. However, if the fetus and mother are stable and the
Obstetric Management
Dehiscence of a prior uterine scar is far more common than
catastrophic uterine rupture.43 Suspected rupture should
prompt immediate delivery. Depending on the condi-
tion of the uterus, the obstetrician may be able to repair
the dehiscence or rupture, but hysterectomy is sometimes
required. cervical exam is favorable, induction of labor and vaginal delivery may be attempted.
Anesthetic Management
Anesthetic Management
ere is no contraindication to regional anesthesia for labor or cesarean delivery if maternal volume status and coagula­tion studies are normal. However, if the mother is hemody­namically unstable or coagulopathic and general anesthesia is planned, etomidate or ketamine may be preferable to
Anesthetic involvement oen begins during an emergency
cesarean delivery for fetal distress, with the uterine rupture
discovered intraoperatively. General anesthesia may be nec-
essary if (1)the case is emergent and a functioning epidural
catheter is not in place for labor analgesia, (2) if there is
hemodynamic instability due to blood loss, or (3)if hyster-
ectomy is required. propofol for induction. Aggressive volume replacement and invasive monitoring may be necessary. Uterine atony is common, and additional oxytocic drugs such as methyler­gonovine and prostaglandins should be available.
UTERINE RUPTURE
Etiology
Conditions associated with uterine rupture include prior uterine surgery, abdominal trauma, direct uterine trauma following forceps delivery or curettage, grand multiparity,
RUPTURE OFAN ECTOPIC PREGNANCY
Etiology
Hemorrhage from ruptured ectopic pregnancy is the lead-
ing cause of pregnancy- related maternal death in the rst
trimester. e major risk factors for ectopic pregnancy
are previous conservative treatment for ectopic pregnancy
(15% recurrence), tubal pathology from infection or sur-
gery, and in utero diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure, but
many patients have no documented risk factors. and fetal macrosomia or malposition. e risk of uterine rupture aer a low transverse uterine incision is 0.5%–
0.9%. Concern for uterine rupture during a trial of labor aer cesarean delivery (TOLAC) has led to more stringent practice guidelines including the immediate availability of all personnel necessary to perform emergency cesarean delivery.
42
Diagnosis
Patients will present with abdominal or pelvic pain and
hemorrhagic shock may develop if rupture has occurred.
Depending on gestational age, an adnexal mass may be
44
seen.
358 SECTION B. CARDIAC CRISES
https://t.me/medicina_free
359
Obstetric/ Gynecologic Management
Urgent surgical removal of the aected fallopian tube or dissection of the ectopic pregnancy with preservation of the tube is required. Laparoscopy is the preferred surgical approach, but if there is extensive bleeding or poor visual­ization of the pelvis, laparotomy should be performed.
45
Anesthetic Management
General endotracheal anesthesia is required for this emer­gent laparoscopic or open abdominal procedure. If hemo­dynamically unstable, standard resuscitative measures should betaken.
POSTPARTUM MATERNAL HEMORRHAGE
UTERINE INVERSION
Etiology
Uterine inversion is an uncommon problem oen associated with fundal pressure during delivery or excessive traction on the umbilical cord, especially if the placenta does not easily separate. e uterine fundus collapses into the endometrial cavity, turning the uterus partially or completely insideout.
Diagnosis
e diagnosis is usually obvious. ere will be massive hem­orrhage due to atony, vasovagal shock due to traction on the uterosacral ligaments, and a mass in the vagina or outside the perineum. Maternal shock and hypotension develop rapidly.
Obstetric Management
Rapid replacement of the uterus is required, followed by oxytocic drugs to maintain uterinetone.
Anesthetic Management
epidural analgesia, uterine relaxation can be accomplished with intravenous nitroglycerin or terbutaline (250 mcg sub­cutaneously or IV). Nitroglycerin has a fast onset and short duration when used in a bolus dose as a tocolytic to accom­plish replacement of the uterus.47 Since it is a vasodilator, when used in the presence of hypovolemia it should be accompanied by a pressor such as phenylephrine. Volume resuscitation must occur simultaneously, and blood loss can be massive, so large bore intravenous access and transfusion is oen necessary.
UTERINEATONY
Etiology
Uterine contraction is the primary mechanism controlling blood loss at delivery, and thus uterine atony is the most common cause of postpartum hemorrhage, accounting for 80% of cases.48 Conditions associated with atony include:
Multiple gestation Chorioamnionitis
Macrosomia Precipitouslabor
Polyhydramnios Augmented labor
(exposure to oxytocin)
High parity (>5) Tocolytic agents
(includingmagnesium)
Prolonged labor Volatile anesthetics
(> 0.5MAC)
Maternal age < 20, > 40 Prior postpartum
hemorrhage
However, over 60% of cases have no recognized risk
factors.
Diagnosis
Uterine atony is diagnosed aer vaginal or cesarean delivery by manual examination of the uterine fundus that demon­strates lack of rmness and muscletone.
Uterine relaxation is oen necessary before the uterus can be replaced, and intense analgesia is also required.46 Rapid induction of general anesthesia with intubation and vola­tile anesthetics could accomplish both of these objectives, however this is impractical in a labor room. Intravenous ketamine (25– 50 mg) for analgesia plus a uterine relax­ant such as nitroglycerin (100– 500 mcg IV) can be used in that setting. If the patient is already comfortable from
SEVERE PERIPARTUM HEMORRHAGE 359
Obstetric Management
In addition to infusion of oxytocin, the obstetrician will per­form bimanual compression of the uterus, uterine massage, and evaluation for retained placenta. Retained placenta can be seen on ultrasound examination and may be removed by a manual sweep or by curettage. Additional oxytocic
360
https://t.me/medicina_free
TABLE50.4 OXYTOCIC MEDICATIONS, DOSING AND SIDE EFFECT PROFILES
Medication
Oxytocin 10- 80 units/ L as an infusion IV bolus doses cause vasodilation and hypotension, hyponatremia can occur when
Methylergonovine 0.2 mg IM Can cause widespread vasoconstriction, increased pulmonary ar tery pressures,
Prostaglandin F2α(Carboprost)
Misoprostol 800 mcg PR May cause fever in high doses
Carbetocin 100 mcg IV Not available in the United States
Dose and Route
0.25 mg IM May cause bronchospasm, increased pulmonary ar tery pressures, VQ mismatching
medications will be administered (Table 50.4). If hemor­rhage continues, other strategies for obstetric management may include placement of an intrauterine balloon catheter for tamponade of the uterus and use of B- Lynch sutures.
Side Effects
diluted in hypotonic intravenous solutions
coronary artery vasospasm, hypertension, nausea and vomiting
with hypoxia, nausea, and diarrhea
All providers on labor and delivery should be prepared to treat obstetric hemorrhage. e National Partnership for Maternal Safety, a joint venture of obstetricians, anesthe-
49
siologists, midwives, pathologists, family physicians, and nurses, has created a consensus bundle for treating obstet-
Anesthetic Management
e patient should be evaluated for hemodynamic stability and need for analgesia. Oxygen should be applied and mon­itors placed for blood pressure and heart rate. If blood loss is ongoing, additional intravenous access and baseline labs should be obtained. If the patient does not have a regional anesthetic and requires short- term analgesia for obstetric
ric hemorrhage that addresses “best practices” for this sce­nario.51 ey stress anticipation of hemorrhage risk factors, preparation of patients at high risk, recognition and rapid response when hemorrhage does occur, and open report­ing and tracking of hemorrhage occurrence so contributing system issues can be identied and corrected. Such initia­tives and clinical practice are crucial as we continue to ght hemorrhage- related obstetric morbidity and mortality.
maneuvers, intravenous fentanyl or ketamine may be given. Moving to the operating room can be benecial so general anesthesia can be induced if necessary, patient position and
CASE- BASED LEARNING DISCUSSION
lighting can be optimized for the obstetrician, and aggres­sive resuscitation can be more easily performed. Consider implementing the massive transfusion protocol with ongo­ing blood loss.
Anesthesiologists should be aware of the dose, route,
1. What are your concerns with placenta previa and a
history of prior cesarean deliveries? What questions would you ask the obstetrician about their ultrasound ndings?
and major side eects of the oxytocic drugs that can be used (Table 50.4). Oxytocin is the mainstay of the uterotonic medications, but the optimal dose is unclear. Bolus doses ≥ 10 units can cause signicant vasodilation and hypo­tension, especially in the presence of hypovolemia due to hemorrhage. Studies comparing women having cesarean delivery without labor to those having cesarean delivery for the indication of labor dystocia have shown the ED90 of oxytocin is increased signicantly aer labor, presumably
2. Should delivery occur immediately? What factors
would lead you to proceed with emergent cesarean and use of general anesthesia?
3. You visit with the patient about the anesthetic plan for
her cesarean delivery. She strongly desires to be awake for the delivery of her baby. Her prior cesareans were all done using regional anesthesia without any problems. Is this a reasonable request?
because of down- regulation of oxytocin receptors in the uterus. Supplemental agents may include methylergono­vine (Methergine) and prostaglandins, with selection oen based on potential adverse eects. Carbetocin, an oxytocin analogue, is highly eective with minimal side eects, but it is not available in the United States.
50
4. Acare conference is planned. How would you present
the anesthetic concerns and your preparation for them? Discuss intravenous access, invasive monitoring, choice of anesthetic, any blood products you would have available, additional equipment, and so forth. Should
360 SECTION B. CARDIAC CRISES
https://t.me/medicina_free
361
this case be done on L&D? e main operating room? In the interventional radiologysuite?
5. During the surgery, signicant hemorrhage occurs. Which laboratory studies will be most useful to you? What transfusion protocol will you use? What does it mean to institute the massive transfusion protocol? Are there medications that can be used in a postpartum woman to treat massive hemorrhage?
6. If the cause of her postpartum hemorrhage was uterine atony rather than abnormal placentation, what oxytocic drugs are available to you? What dose and route of administration would you use? What are their side eects?
REFERENCES
1. Creanga AA, Berg CJ, Syverson C, Seed K, Bruce FC, Callaghan
WM. Pregnancy- related mortality in the United States, 2006– 2010. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125:5– 12.
2. Hogan MC, Foreman KJ, Naghavi M, etal. Maternal mortality for
181 countries, 1980– 2008:a systematic analysis of progress towards Millennium Development Goal 5. Lancet. 2010;375:1609– 23.
3. Grobman WA, Bailit JL, Rice MM, et al. Frequency of and fac-
tors associated with severe maternal morbidity. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:804– 10.
4. Dutton RP, Lee LA, Stephens LS, Posner KL, Davies JM, Domino
KB. Massive hemorrhage:a report from the anesthesia closed claims project. Anesthesiology. 2014;121:450– 8.
5. Main EK, McCain CL, Morton CH, Holtby S, Lawton ES.
Pregnancy- related mortalit y in California:causes, characteristics, and improvement opportunities. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125:938– 47.
6. Kacmar RM, Mhyre JM, Scavone BM, Fuller AJ, Toledo P. e use
of postpartum hemorrhage protocols in United States academic obstetric anesthesia units. Anesth Analg. 2014;119:906– 10.
7. Kramer MS, Berg C, Abenhaim H, etal. Incidence, risk factors, and
temporal trends in severe postpartum hemorrhage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209:449.e1– 7.
8. Mhyre JM, Shilkrut A, Kuklina EV, etal. Massive blood transfusion
during hospitalization for delivery in NewYork State, 1998– 2007. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:1288– 94.
9. Postpartum hemorrhage from vaginal delivery. Patient Safety
Checklist Number 10. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:1151– 2.
10. Zuckerwise LC, Pettker CM, Illuzzi J, Raab CR, Lipkind HS. Use
of a novel visual aid to improve estimation of obstetric blood loss. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:982– 6.
11. McDonnell NJ, Kennedy D, Long LJ, Gallagher- Swann MC, Paech
MJ. e development and implementation of an obstetric cell sal­vage service. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010;38:492– 9.
12. Weinstein A, Chandra P, Schiavello H, Fleischer A. Conservative
management of placenta previa percreta in a Jehovah’s Witness. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:1247– 50.
13. Lee HY, Shin JH, Kim J, etal. Primary postpartum hemorrhage :out-
come of pelvic arterial embolization in 251 patients at a single insti­tution. Radiology. 2012;264:903– 9.
14. Sadashivaiah J, Wilson R, ein A, McLure H, Hammond CJ,
Lyons G. Role of prophylactic uterine artery balloon catheters in the
management of women with suspected placenta accrete. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2011;20:282– 7.
15. Al- unyan A, Al- Meshal O, Al- Hussainan H, Al- Qahtani MH, El­Sayed AAF, Al- Qattan MM. Buttock necrosis and paraplegia aer bilateral internal iliac artery embolization for postpartum hemor­rhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:468– 70.
16. Barth WH, Kwolek CJ, Abrams JL, Ecker JL, Roberts DJ. Case 23- 2011:a 40- year old pregnant woman with placenta accreta who declined blood products. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:359– 66.
17. Rajasekhar A, Gowing R, Zarychanski R, etal. Survival of trauma patients aer massive red blood cell transfusion using a high or low red blood cell to plasma transfusion ratio. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:1507– 13.
18. Pasquier P, Gayat E, Rackelboom T, etal. An observational study of the fresh frozen plasma:red blood cell ratio in postpartum hemor­rhage. Anesth Analg. 2013;116:155– 61.
19. Shields LE, Smalarz K, Regee L, Mugg S, Burdumy TJ, Propst M. Comprehensive maternal hemorrhage protocols improve patient safety and reduce utilization of blood products. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:368.e1– 8.
20. Butwick AJ. Postpartum hemorrhage and low brinogen levels:the past, present and future. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2013;22:87– 91.
21. Cortet M, Deneaux- araux C, Dupont C, et al. Association between brinogen level and severity of postpartum haemor­rhage: secondary analysis of a prospective trial. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:984– 9.
22. Ickx BE. Fluid and blood transfusion management in obstetrics. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27:1031– 5.
23. deLange NM, van Rheenen- Flach LE, Lance MD, etal. Peri- partum reference ranges for ROTEM® thromboelastometry. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112:852– 9.
24. Chandler WL. Emergency assessment of hemostasis in the bleeding patient. Int J Lab Hematol. 2013;35:339– 43.
25. Sentilhes L, Lasocki S, Ducloy- Bouthors AS, etal. Tranexamic acid for the prevention and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage. Br J Anaesth. 2015;114:576– 87.
26. World Maternal Antibrinolytic Trial (WOMAN). Trials.gov. US National Institutes of Health;2012.
27. Alrevic A, Elbourne D, Pavbord S, et al. Use of recombinant activated factor VII in primary postpartum hemorrhage: the northern European registry 2000– 2004. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:1270– 8.
28. Phillips LE, McLintock C, Pollock W, et al. Recombinant acti­vated factor VII in obstetric hemorrhage: experiences from the Australian and New Zealand haemostasis registry. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:1908– 15.
29. Leighton BL, Wall MH, Lockhart EM, Phillips LE, Zatta AJ. Use of recombinant factor VIIa in patients with amniotic uid embolism. Anesthesiology. 2011;115:1201– 8.
30. Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, etal. Maternal morbidity asso­ciated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:1226– 32.
31. Grobman WA, Gersnoviez R, Landon MB, et al. Pregnancy out­comes for women with placenta previa in relation to the number of prior cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:1249– 55.
32. Silver RM. Abnormal placentation:placenta previa, vasa previa, and placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126:654– 68.
33. Bowman ZS, Eller AG, Kennedy AM, et al. Accuracy of ultra­sound for the prediction of placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211:177.e1– 7.
34. Placenta accreta. Committee Opinion No. 529. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:207– 11.
35. Weinstein A, Chandra P, Schiavello H, Fleischer A. Conservative management of placenta previa percreta in a Jehovah’s Witness. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:1247– 50.
SEVERE PERIPARTUM HEMORRHAGE 361
362
https://t.me/medicina_free
36. Kayem G, Davy C, Gonet F, omas C, Clement D, Cabrol D. Conservative versus extirpative management in cases of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:531– 6.
37. Clark A, Farber MK, Sviggum H, Camann W. Cesarean delivery in the hybrid operating suite: a promising new location for high- risk obstetric procedures. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:1187– 9.
38. Frederiksen MC, Glassenberg R, Stika CS. Placenta previa:a 22­year analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:1432– 7.
39. Parekh N, Husaini WU, Russell IF. Caesarean section for placenta praevia: a retrospective study of anaesthetic management. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84:725– 30.
40. El- Messidi A, Mallozzi A, Oppenheimer L. A multidisciplinary checklist for management of suspected placenta accreta. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012;34:320– 4.
41. Pavord S, Maybury H. How Itreat postpartum hemorrhage. Blood. 2015;125:2759– 2770.
42. Vaginal birth aer previous cesarean delivery. Practice Bulletin no.115. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:450– 63 (rearmed2013).
43. Eller AG, Fisher B. Diagnosis of uterine rupture on CT. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:170.
44. Murray H, Baakdah H, Bardell T, Tulandi T. Diagnosis and treat­ment of ectopic pregnancy. CMAJ. 2005;173:905– 12.
45. Barnhart KT. Ectopic pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:379– 87.
46. Beringer RM, Patteril M. Puerperal uterine inversion and shock. Br J Anaesth 2004;92:439– 41.
47. Wong RW, Greeneld MLVH, Polley LS. Nitroglycerin for uter­ine inversion in the absence of placental fragments. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:511– 2.
48. Bateman BT, Berman MF, Riley LE, Leert LR. e epidemiology of postpartum hemorrhage in a large, nationwide sample of deliver­ies. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:1368– 73.
49. Yoong W, Ridout A, Memtsa M, etal. Application of uterine com­pression suture in association with intrauterine balloon tamponade (“uterine sandwich”) for postpartum hemorrhage. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91:147– 51.
50. Su LL, Chong YS, Samuel M. Carbetocin for preventing postpar­tum haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;CD005457.
51. Main EK, Goman D, Scavone BM, etal. National partnership for maternal safety:consensus bundle on obstetric hemorrhage. Anesth Analg. 2015;121:142– 8.
362 SECTION B. CARDIAC CRISES
https://t.me/medicina_free
363
51.
VALVULAR DISEASE
SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS FORMANAGEMENT DURING LABOR AND DELIVERY
Shobana Chandrasekhar and C. LaToyaMason
CLINICALCASE
MATERNAL RISK ASSESSMENT AND MONITORING
A 30- year- old G2P0 with moderate mitral stenosis is admit­ted to labor and delivery with mild uterine contractions at 37 weeks gestation. She has a history of atrial brillation at 28 weeks, which was treated with digoxin and beta blockers. Currently, she is painfully contracting and is seeking labor analgesia. Vital signs are stable, but intermittent premature atrial contractions (PACs) and short runs of supraventricu­lar tachycardia (SVT) are present on telemetry monitoring.
Cardiovascular disease occurs in only 1%– 3% of pregnan­cies but accounts for 10%– 15% of maternal mortality.6 Identifying parturients at increased risk for catastrophic cardiovascular complication is paramount. Factors that may predict increased maternal cardiac risk include history of prior cardiac events or arrhythmias, signicant le ven­tricular obstruction and/ or dysfunction, functional status, and degree of symptoms present. Women with no or very mild symptoms (New York Heart Association [NYHA]
INTRODUCTION
Classes Iand II) tolerate pregnancy reasonably well, while
those with marked congestive symptoms (NYHA Classes Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of maternal mor­bidity and mortality.
1,2
In the United States, cardiovascu­lar conditions ranked rst among categorical contributors to an overall increased pregnancy- related mortality ratio during the years 2006– 2010.3 Complex valvular heart disease accounts for approximately 30% to 50% of all car­diac diseases of pregnancy, and management of aected parturients can be quite challenging.
4,5
Determination of disease severity and maternal risk assessment are espe­cially important to development of appropriate plans of care and to prevent adverse maternal and fetal outcomes during the labor, delivery, and immediate postpartum periods. An understanding of the pathophysiology of the various causative lesions, thorough evaluation, and a mul­tidisciplinary approach are key components to the success­ful management of these patients, allowing for selection of an anesthetic technique that balances the benets and consequences to both mother and infant, thereby leading to optimal patient outcomes. More detailed background information about each lesion for the general adult popu­lation is presented in the “Severe Valvular Disease” chapter in the “Cardiac Crises” section.
III and IV) are at risk for major morbidity and mortality.7 In women with valvular cardiac disease, risk assessment should ideally be initiated at a preconception visit and continued throughout pregnancy. e Task Force on the Management of Cardiovascular Disease during Pregnancy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) currently recommends use of integrated risk stratication.8 e ESC’s stratication scheme, a modication of the World Health Organization’s approach that incorporates all known maternal cardiovas­cular risk factors, represents the most comprehensive risk assessment system available to date (Figure51.1).
At the minimum, standard ASA monitoring should be utilized in the management of parturients with valvu­lar disease. Electrocardiogram allows for ongoing eval­uation of heart rate and detection of arrhythmias. Labor, delivery, and the immediate postpartum periods are highly dynamic states; invasive blood pressure monitoring oers the benets of beat- to- beat assessment and a con­duit whereby specimens may be easily obtained for lab­oratory studies. Parturients with severe valvular disease only rarely require central venous catheter +/ - pulmonary artery catheterization. Notably, technological advances
363
364
https://t.me/medicina_free
WHO I WHO II
Mild or uncomplicated Mild or uncomplicated - Mechanical valve- Severe mitral stenosis
- pulmonary stenosis
- patent ductus arteriosus
- mitral valve proplapse
Repaired simple lesions (PDA, ASD, VSD, total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage).
Isolated atrial or ventricular ectopic beats
Patient can be considered
very low risk, with no
increased mortality and
no/mild increase in
maternal morbitdity.
Patient’s follow up with
cardiologist can be
limited to one or two
visits during pregnancy.
- Uncorrected ASD or VSD
- Tetralogy of Fallot (repaired)
- Arrhythmias
WHO II or III
(Varies based on individual patient)
- Mild compromised left ventricular function
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- Valvular heart disease not considered WHO I or IV
- Marfan syndrome with normal aortic diameter
- Bicuspid aortic valve associated with aortic dilatation not >45 mm
- Repaired aortic coarctation with bicuspid aortic valve
Patient can be considered at
low to moderate risk with
mild increase in maternal
mortality and moderate
increase in morbidity.
Patient’s follow up with
cardiologist should be every
trimester.
WHO III WHO IV
- Systemic right ventricle
- Fontan circulation
- Tetrology of Fallot (unrepaired)
- Other complex congenital heart disease
- Aortic dilatation 40–45 mm in Marfan syndrome or 45–50 mm in patients with bicuspid aortic valve
Patient can be considered high risk with significantly
increased morbidity and
mortality.
Patient should be cared for
by expert multispecialty
interdisciplinary team Monthly or bimonthly
cardiac and obstetric
monitoring if pregnancy
pursued.
- Severe symptomatic aortic stenosis
- Pulmonary arterial hypertension
- Severe left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF <30%, NYHA Class III-IV)
- History or peripartum cardiomyopathy with residually impaired left ventricular function.
- Uncorrected severe coarctation
- Marfan syndrome with aorta dilated >45 mm or aortic dilatation >50 mm with bicuspid aortic valve
Patient should be
considered extremely high
risk and pregnancy is
contraindicated secondary
to high risk of maternal
mortality and severe
morbidity.
If pregnancy does occur,
close monthly or
bimonthly followup is
necessary.
Figure51.1 Risk stratication:the modied World Health Organization (WHO) approach. © 2014 Michael Nanna and Kathleen Stergiopoulos. Journal of the American Heart
Association. 2014;3:e000712.
including noninvasive cardiac output monitoring modali­ties (e.g., Edwards EV1000 and Cheetah NICOM) and serial transthoracic echocardiography have largely replaced the use of highly invasive monitors in obstetric anesthesia. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) can be used in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery with general anesthesia.
TYPES OFVALVULAR HEART DISEASE:PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
A clear understanding of each of the dierent valvular lesions and the accompanying pathophysiology is needed for optimal patient outcome.
AORTIC STENOSIS
Aortic stenosis (AS) is an abnormal narrowing of the aortic valve’s orice that obstructs blood ow from the le ven­tricle (LV). e occurrence of AS in pregnancy is rare, yet signicant, given that pregnancy is a high- risk period for patients with aortic pathology. Aortic pathology is noted to be one of the leading causes of maternal mortality in the 2003– 2005 report of the UK Condential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health.
8,9
Women with AS may toler­ate the hemodynamic changes of pregnancy well and may potentially be asymptomatic when the obstruction is of mild or moderate severity as quantied by an aortic valve area greater than 1.0cm2. In critical AS, with valvular area less than 0.5cm2 and ow gradient greater than 60mmHg, the patient may experience dyspnea, angina, and/ or syncope.
364 SECTION B. CARDIAC CRISES
https://t.me/medicina_free
365
Symptomatology indicates considerable risk for arrhyth­mias, myocardial decompensation, pulmonary edema, and LV failure.10 e incidence of complications for both mother and fetus directly increases with severity of AS. Women with a bicuspid aortic valve etiology of severe AS are also at risk for aortic dilation and dissection, hypertension- related dis­orders, and premature labor, and infants born to women
pregnancy, catheter- based valvuloplasty, and surgical valve replacement.4 If denitive surgical intervention is required early in pregnancy, the risk of fetal mortality may be as high as 30%.15 e inammatory and nonpulsatile nature of car­diopulmonary bypass have profoundly negative eects on uteroplacental blood ow and the fetus that may be exag­gerated by concurrent hypotension and hypothermia.
6
with severe AS may have intrauterine growth restriction resulting in premature birth and low birth weight.
Women with AS should undergo echocardiography to assess aortic valve parameters, and, even if asymptom­atic, antepartum exercise testing is recommended. Surgical intervention prior to pregnancy is recommended for symp­tomatic patients with severe AS.12 For patients who develop signs and symptoms of heart failure during pregnancy, there is no optimal medical treatment, but therapy may include restriction of activities and cautious administration of diuretics to improve congestive symptoms. Beta blockers or calcium channel antagonists may help achieving the overall management goals of avoiding tachycardia, preserving pre­load and circulating blood volume, and maintaining SVR. Phenylephrine, an alpha- adrenergic agonist, is the vaso­pressor of choice in patients with AS, as it helps preserve coronary perfusion pressure.
13,14
Cardiac surgery is reserved for when medical management fails, because cardiac surgi­cal morbidity and mortality in parturients is higher versus nonpregnant patients.6 If a severely symptomatic pregnant patient does not respond to medical therapy, depending on gestational age, providers should discuss termination of
11
Anesthesia forLabor and Delivery inParturients withAortic Stenosis
Obstetric indications and maternal severity of disease strongly inuence mode and timing of delivery. Labor with or without assisted vaginal delivery is preferred and may be safely pursued in the asymptomatic patient with mild- moderate AS who has tolerated pregnancy very well. Assisted second stage is more commonly used in patients with moderate- severe AS and those patients with dilated aorticroots.
Hemodynamic management principles for the parturi­ent with AS are listed in Table 51.1 and include the follow­ing:(1)avoidance of aortocaval compression, (2)avoidance of tachycardia, (3)avoidance of decreases in systemic vascular resistance, and (4)maintenance of venous return and le ven­tricular lling.13 Anesthetic strategies during labor and deliv­ery include early placement of an epidural catheter to allow gradual titration of analgesia using an epidural solution com­posed of low- concentration local anesthetic and narcotic (Box
51.1). Acombined spinal- epidural technique with intrathecal
TABLE51.1 HEMODYNAMIC GOALS OFVALVULAR LESIONS MOST COMMONLY ENCOUNTERED INPREGNANCY
Valvular Lesion
Mitral Stenosis Avoid tachycardia, as it causes decrease inw LV lling time and underlling of LV
Mitral Regurgitation Avoid bradycardia. Maintenance of normal to elevated heart rate is advocated.
Aortic Stenosis Maintain normal sinus rhythm.
Aortic Regurgitation Maintenance of normal to elevated hear t rate is advocated.
LV=left ventricle; SVR=systemic vascular resistance
SOURCE:Reprinted with permission from Chandrasekhar S, Suresh MS. Chapter45:Anesthetic management of critically ill parturient with cardiac disease. In:Belfort M, Saade GR, etal.,
eds., Critical Care Obstetrics. 5th ed. NewYork:Blackwell- Wiley; 2010:639– 55.
VALVULAR DISEASE 365
Hemodynamic Principles of Anesthetic Management
Maintain preload
Maintain normal sinus rhythm. Atrial brillation can precipitate pulmonary edema
Avoid myocardial depression. As LV impairment usually accompanies mitral insufciency, even
minimal myocardial depression may cause signicant compromise.
Avoid increase in SVR, as it will increase the regurgitant ow and decrease forward ow.
Avoid decrease inSVR.
Maintain preload and LV lling
Avoid myocardial depression. As LV impairment usually accompanies aortic insufciency, even
minimal myocardial depression may cause signicant compromise.
Avoid increase in SVR as it will increase the regurgitant ow and decrease forward ow.
Preferred First- Line Vasopressor
Phenylephrine
Ephedrine
Phenylephrine
Ephedrine
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025