Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 715 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
16 Мб
Скачать
9 Use of Fluorescence Guidance in Plastic and Reconstructive…
https://t.me/medicina_free
• Relative percentage provides information about the uores­cence of a selected area relative to a pre-selected reference point that represents an ideal perfusion of 100%. In general, a percentage of 15–20% or less indicates poor perfusion which indicates higher chance of tissue necrosis.
• Absolute measurement utilizing a 255-level grayscale system which depends on signal intensity. The level reported ranges from 0 to 255 with a higher level indicating higher perfusion and a lower level (generally 6.0) indicating lower perfusion.
With the use of optical technologies such as ICG angiography,
there has been signicant improvement in the capacity of:
• Preoperative planning by identifying tissue viability (e.g., per­fusion during debridement of bone, muscle perfusion before and during reconstruction)
• Intraoperative reconstruction by optimizing ap design
• Postoperative evaluation of areas of poor ap perfusion and anticipation of possible areas of subsequent tissue necrosis
269
Timing ofDye Administration: Preoperative Considerations
Methylene blue and lymphazurin blue will interfere with imaging. Likewise, vasoconstrictors such as epinephrine will decrease blood ow and interfere with imaging. A delay of at least 2h after admin­istration of epinephrine is required before imaging [23], (level of evidence 5). Factors associated with ischemia include previous surgery, previous radiation treatment, current smoking, obesity, diabetes, vasculopathy, chronic steroid use, and thin aps [24, 25].
Timing ofDye Administration: Intraoperative Considerations
The intraoperative use of image-guided technologies such as ICG angiography at the time of ap design, ap elevation, ap inset, and nal closure allows for intraoperative modications such as
270
https://t.me/medicina_free
angiosome mapping (especially useful in random, propeller aps), excision of distal ap segments with poor perfusion, ap inset modications (ischemic incision closures, especially in closures under tension, or in cases of a skin/tissue bridge), or evaluation of free ap anastomoses, which will all allow for improvement in reconstructive surgeries.
In our institution, we have been using both SPY-PHI and SPY­Elite uorescence imaging systems by Stryker/LifeCell. SPY-PHI refers to the “Portable Handheld Imager.” The imaging head is positioned prior to the anesthesiologist giving the ICG.The ICG (25mg) is reconstituted with 10ml of sterile water. This yields a
2.5mg/ml solution of ICG.For plastic, reconstructive, and micro­surgery cases, the volume of ICG for images which are acquired through the patient’s skin is 3–4 ml [7]. ICG is administered through a peripheral IV and ushed with 10ml of saline immedi­ately prior to imaging. It is often given prior to closing in order to assess skin perfusion. It can also be utilized preoperatively during ap design, intraoperatively to assess ap perfusion prior to inset­ting, and after completion of surgery. We will sometimes use uo­rescence angiography two or three times during the operation. Recordings are performed according to the owner’s manual for SPY-PHI or SPY-Elite [24, 25].
Z. A. Koenig et al.
Timing ofDye Administration: Postoperative Considerations
In addition to the described traditional methods for evaluation of tissue perfusion (physical examination, Doppler ultrasound, tactile feedback), technologies such as the SPY-Q system can provide objective data of tissue perfusion and vascular anastomosis patency (such as use to evaluate venous thrombosis at the anastomosis) and even allow evaluation of neovascularization of a ap to determine if a pedicled ap is ready for division and insetting [26], (level of evidence 4).
Our institutional experience and literature review shows that the use of ICG uorescence angiography allows early detection of tissue with compromised vascularity and minimizes the risks of
9 Use of Fluorescence Guidance in Plastic and Reconstructive…
https://t.me/medicina_free
postoperative partial or total necrosis, which can lead to further surgeries, surgical revisions, poor outcomes, and increased mor­bidity.
271
Documentation andMedical Coding
Appropriate coding and documentation are essential for reim­bursement for uorescence angiography. The American Medical Association Current Professional Terminology (CPT) Professional Codebook 2022 lists 15,860 as the appropriate code. CPT code 15860 is dened as “intravenous injection of agent (e.g., uores­cein) to test vascular ow in ap or graft.” In this case, the agent is ICG.There are no additional codes for the intraoperative laser angiography. CPT codes 99,240 and 99,242 refer to ICG angiog­raphy specically for ophthalmology and are not appropriate for aps elsewhere on the body [27].
According to the 2022 National Physician Fee Schedule Relative Value File, CPT code 15860 has a corresponding work relative value unit (RVU) of 1.95 and a facility total RVU of 3.14 [28]. To best ensure reimbursement, copies of intraoperative angi­ography images must be retained and placed in the patient’s med­ical record.
Conclusion
The use of image-guided surgery such as SPY-Q system in extremity reconstruction, not only by plastic surgeons but also by surgeons in associated departments such as orthopedic surgery, general surgery, trauma surgery, vascular surgery, and otolaryn­gology, allows improvement in tissue salvage through reliable debridement, improvement in function, and better treatment plan­ning. Such technologies are useful in all settings (preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively) and help facilitate decisions of ap design, ap assessment, and early detection of potential tissue necrosis, decreasing additional surgeries and morbidity.
272
https://t.me/medicina_free
Z. A. Koenig et al.
Overall, the use of uorescence angiography reduces complica­tions and improves outcomes [29].
References
1. Burns PB, Rohrich RJ, Chung KC.The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(1):305–10.
https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318219c171.
2. Lohman RF, Ozturk CN, Ozturk C, Jayaprakash V, Djohan R. An analysis of current techniques used for intraoperative ap evaluation. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;75(6):679–85. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000235.
3. Ludolph I, Horch RE, Arkudas A, Schmitz M.Enhancing safety in recon­structive microsurgery using intraoperative indocyanine green angiogra­phy. Front Surg. 2019;6:39. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2019.00039.
4. Obana A, Miki T, Hayashi K, etal. Survey of complications of indocya­nine green angiography in Japan. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994;118(6):749–
53. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002- 9394(14)72554- 1.
5. Holm C, Tegeler J, Mayr M, Becker A, Pfeiffer UJ, Mühlbauer W.Monitoring free aps using laser-induced uorescence of indocyanine green: a preliminary experience. Microsurgery. 2002;22(7):278–87.
https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.10052.
6. Hitier M, Cracowski JL, Hamou C, Righini C, Bettega G.Indocyanine green uorescence angiography for free ap monitoring: a pilot study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016;44(11):1833–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jcms.2016.09.001.
7. Mothes H, Dönicke T, Friedel R, Simon M, Markgraf E, Bach O.Indocyanine- green uorescence video angiography used clinically to evaluate tissue perfusion in microsurgery. J Trauma. 2004;57(5):1018–
24. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000123041.47008.70.
8. Dietz MJ, Hare JT, Ueno C, Prud’homme BJ, Boyd JW. Laser-assisted uorescent angiography to assess tissue perfusion in the setting of trau­matic elbow dislocation. Wounds Compend Clin Res Pract. 2018;30(10):E93–7.
9. Green JM, Sabino J, Fleming M, Valerio I. Intraoperative plastic and reconstructive surgery: a review of applications and outcomes in war­related trauma. Mil Med. 2015;180(3 Suppl):37–43. https://doi.
org/10.7205/MILMED- D- 14- 00632.
10. Graham BH, Walton RL, Elings VB, Lewis FR.Surface quantication of injected uorescein as a predictor of ap viability. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;71(6):826–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-
198306000- 00016.
11. Still J, Law E, Dawson J, Bracci S, Island T, Holtz J.Evaluation of the circulation of reconstructive aps using laser-induced uorescence of
9 Use of Fluorescence Guidance in Plastic and Reconstructive…
https://t.me/medicina_free
indocyanine green. Ann Plast Surg. 1999;42(3):266–74. https://doi.
org/10.1097/00000637- 199903000- 00007.
12. Holzbach T, Taskov C, Henke J, et al. Evaluation of perfusion in skin aps by laser-induced indocyanine green uorescence. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2005;37(6):396–402. https://doi.
org/10.1055/s- 2005- 872986.
13. Krishnan KG, Schackert G, Steinmeier R.The role of near-infrared angi­ography in the assessment of post-operative venous congestion in random pattern, pedicled Island and free aps. Br J Plast Surg. 2005;58(3):330–8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2004.10.003.
14. Yano T, Okazaki M, Tanaka K, Tsunoda A, Aoyagi M, Kishimoto S.Use of intraoperative uorescent indocyanine green angiography for real-time vascular evaluation of pericranial aps. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;76(2):198–
204. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000519.
15. Nergård S, Mercer JB, de Weerd L.Impact on abdominal skin perfusion following abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021;9(1):e3343. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003343.
16. Patel KM, Bhanot P, Franklin B, Albino F, Nahabedian MY.Use of intra­operative indocyanin-green angiography to minimize wound healing complications in abdominal wall reconstruction. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2013;47(6):476–80. https://doi.org/10.3109/2000656X.2013.787085.
17. Swanson E.Comparison of limited and full dissection abdominoplasty using laser uorescence imaging to evaluate perfusion of the abdominal skin. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(1):31e–43e. https://doi.org/10.1097/
PRS.0000000000001376.
18. Mayr M, Holm C, Höfter E, Becker A, Pfeiffer U, Mühlbauer W.Effects of aesthetic abdominoplasty on abdominal wall perfusion: a quantitative evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(6):1586–94. https://doi.
org/10.1097/01.prs.0000138757.33998.ee.
19. Colavita PD, Wormer BA, Belyansky I, etal. Intraoperative indocyanine green uorescence angiography to predict wound complications in com­plex ventral hernia repair. Hernia. 2016;20(1):139–49. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s10029- 015- 1411- 4.
20. Burnier P, Niddam J, Bosc R, Hersant B, Meningaud JP. Indocyanine green applications in plastic surgery: a review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2017;70(6):814–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
bjps.2017.01.020.
21. Cornelissen AJM, van Mulken TJM, Graupner C, et al. Near-infrared uorescence image-guidance in plastic surgery: a systematic review. Eur J Plast Surg. 2018;41(3):269–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238- 018-
1404- 5.
22. Holm C, Mayr M, Höfter E, Becker A, Pfeiffer UJ, Mühlbauer W. Intraoperative evaluation of skin-ap viability using laser-induced uorescence of indocyanine green. Br J Plast Surg. 2002;55(8):635–44.
https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.2002.3969.
273
274
https://t.me/medicina_free
23. Gurtner GC, Jones GE, Neligan PC, etal. Intraoperative laser angiogra­phy using the SPY system: review of the literature and recommendations for use. Ann Surg Innov Res. 2013;7:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-
1164- 7- 1.
24. SPY Elite imaging system (Lifecell) operator’s manual. Stryker. 2013.
https://www.stryker.com/us/en/endoscopy/products/spy- elite.html.
Accessed 16 Feb 2022.
25. SPY Portable Hand Imaging System (PHI) operator’s manual. Stryker.
2019. https://www.stryker.com/us/en/endoscopy/products/spy- phi.html. Accessed 16 Feb 2022.
26. Mandelbaum M, Lakhiani C, Lenert JJ.Is 21 days too short? Utility of indocyanine green angiography in predicting successful cross-leg ap division in the compromised lower extremity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;147(5):919e–20e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007872.
27. CPT Professional 2022. American Medical Association (AMA); 2021.
28. 2022 National Physician Fee Schedule Relative Value File. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 2021. https://www.cms.gov/
medicaremedicare- fee- service- paymentphysicianfeeschedpfs- relative­value- les/rvu22a. Accessed 16 Feb 2022.
29. Liu DZ, Mathes DW, Zenn MR, Neligan PC.The application of indocya­nine green uorescence angiography in plastic surgery. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2011;27(6):355–64. https://doi.org/10.1055/s- 0031- 1281515.
Z. A. Koenig et al.
Use ofFluorescence
https://t.me/medicina_free
Guidance inBurn Surgery
ApinutWongkietkachorn, PalakornSurakunprapha, SupawichWongkietkachorn, SarinyaBoonpoapichart, andPhacharaLongmeewong
Introduction
Burn injuries are a signicant global public health issue because of their high frequency and potentially severe physical, emotional, and economical effects on people, households, and communities [1, 2]. Burns from re, heat, and hot substances rank fourth among all civilian traumatic injuries in the globe, after falls, trafc acci­dents, and interpersonal violence [2]. According to the estimation, there are between 7 and 12 million people (up to 33,000 every
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at
https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3- 031- 40685- 0_10.
10
A. Wongkietkachorn (*) Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand
P. Surakunprapha · S. Boonpoapichart · P. Longmeewong Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand e-mail: palsur@kku.ac.th; L_phachara@kkumail.com
S. Wongkietkachorn Department of Surgery, Police General Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 N. Szoka et al. (eds.), The SAGES Manual of Fluorescence-Guided Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40685-0_10
275
276
https://t.me/medicina_free
day) suffering each year from burn injuries that necessitate medi­cal attention, cause extended absences from work or school, or even result in death [3]. In contrast, the incidence of burn injuries is higher than the combined incidence of tuberculosis and human immunodeciency virus (HIV/AIDS), and it is close to the inci­dence of all malignant neoplasms [4].
Burns result in high morbidity and cost [5]. Nonfatal burns are the main cause of morbidity, which includes extended hospital stays, disgurement, and disability, frequently with associated rejection and social stigmata [2]. According to a recent study, burn injuries have an impact on morbidity and mortality for at least 5 to 10years following the injury [5]. The overall cost of hospital care per patient ranged from US$ 10.58 to US$ 125,597.86 [6]. The cost of 1% of total body surface area burned varied from US$ 2.65 to US$ 11,245.04, and the cost of hospital care per day varied from US$ 24.23 to US$ 4125.50 [6].
This chapter will discuss on the knowledge of burn wound evaluation, various methods of burn determination, the limitation of burn depth determination, and a thorough review of the devel­opment, fundamentals, and evidence base for using ICGA precise marking for burn wound evaluation and excision in clinical practice.
A. Wongkietkachorn et al.
Pathophysiology ofBurn Wounds
Burn wounds result from accidental injury to the human body by various etiologies such as heat, electricity, friction, chemicals, or radiation [7]. Thermal injury is reported to be the most common [8]. The extent of thermal injury correlates with the contact time, tem­perature, and skin thickness of the damaged area [9]. Thermal burns can be produced by ames, hot objects, liquids, and steam [10].
The pathophysiology of burns can be classied into two lev­els: local changes and systemic changes [7]. Local tissues are damaged when the tissue came into contact with the thermal source resulting in heat transfer. This induces coagulative necro­sis, intraepidermal separation, or dermoepidermal separation [11]. Burns lead to systemic changes when the injury reaches
10 Use ofFluorescence Guidance inBurn Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
277
approximately 20% of total body surface area (TBSA) [12]. The consequences are signicant hypovolemia and the release of numerous inammatory mediators resulting in a cardiovascular insufciency known as burn shock [12, 13]. Burn shock is a com- plicated circulatory and microcirculatory failure process that causes generalized edema in both injured and uninjured body parts. Although the patient is appropriately resuscitated, the burn shock remains irreversible in some severe cases.
Burn wounds are categorized based on the depth of tissue injury, which determines the burn management to be either con­servative or operative. Burn depth is classied into four catego­ries: epidermal, supercial partial-thickness, deep partial-thickness, and full-thickness skin loss [14, 15]. Epidermal burns involve only the epidermis. The typical etiology is sunburn. The wounds appear erythematous, painful, and blanch with pres­sure. Supercial partial-thickness burns affect the supercial part of the dermis, with scald burn being the most frequent etiology. These wounds are erythematous and tender, and blisters can appear up to 24h after the injury. Deep partial-thickness burns involve the deep part of the dermis, where hair follicles and glan­dular tissue are located. This kind of burn wound is not painful unless the burn area is pressured with signicant force. These wounds contain variously mottled colorization from patchy white to red, and they were not blanched with the pressure. Finally, full­thickness burns, the deepest degree, involve the epidermis and all layers of the dermis. A diverse wound color can be observed, such as waxy white, leathery gray, charred, and dark black. The wound is dry, inelastic, and painless. It does not blanched with pressure.
There are several factors affecting the treatment of burn wounds. Inammatory and anti-inammatory medications can disturb the healing process [16, 17]. Inammation is the early phase of wound healing. When the inammatory mediators are released, they stim­ulate immune signals, causing the engagement of leukocytes and macrophages, which primarily start the proliferation phase of inammation [16]. These cytokines from the inammatory pro­cess activate keratinocytes and broblasts to migrate from the hair follicles to the injury area, consequently aiding wound reepitheli­alization [18]. Thus, inammation is vital for the success of burn
278
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. Wongkietkachorn et al.
wound healing. Anti-inammatory treatments can worsen the wound healing mechanism and prolong the healing process [17]. For example, conventional anti- inammatory therapy, such as nonsteroidal anti-inammatory drugs or steroids, inhibits prosta­glandin synthesis, which inevitably impairs wound healing [19].
Infection can also impair burn wound healing [20]. The skin is a vital organ, which serves as a barrier to protect the external envi­ronment, maintain body temperature and homeostasis, provide sensory detection, and provide metabolic and immunological sup­port. Destruction of this vital organ damages the innate immuno­logical response and increases the risk of infection [20]. Therefore, burn patients are certainly at a higher risk of infection [21]. When burn patients are hospitalized long enough to get infected by drug-resistant organisms, the infection process prolongs the hos­pital stay, delays the wound healing, increases hospital cost, and increases mortality [22, 23].
Nutrition contributes to proper burn wound healing [24]. Minimizing the consequence of hypermetabolism and supplying adequate nutritional support are the main components that contrib­ute to the appropriate wound healing process and recovery [25].
The following health factors can also impact burn severity and the burn recovery process: diabetes, obesity, and geriatric status. Diabetes mellitus signicantly affects burn patients [26]. It impairs the body’s ability to deal with stress due to glucose- related cell, end-organ, and vascular damage, which deteriorates clinical out­comes in admitted patients [27]. The hyperglycemic state injures the immune cells causing their function to be impaired. This dis­tinctly leads to a greater risk of infection in diabetic patients [28], which is one of the lethal complications in burns [20].
Patients with excessive adiposity can also have altered physi­ological responses in burns, thus are considered a challenge in burn treatment [29]. Burn patients with obesity usually have mul­tiple comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and lung disease [29]. Even with a burn assessment tool, for example, the Lund-Browder chart, the body surface area can be misinterpreted due to the deviated body mass distribution in obesity [30].
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025