Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 715 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
16 Мб
Скачать
8 Use ofFluorescence Guidance inBreast Reconstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
239
ab
Fig. 8.1 (a, b) Intraoperative mastectomy aps before and after SPY angiog- raphy. Areas of hypoperfusion are darker than areas of adequate perfusion
a marking pen to delineate the separation between areas of ade­quate perfusion and areas of hypoperfusion based on angiography image (Fig. 8.1a, b). Following dissection of perforators, dissection of the donor site ap, and microvascular anastomosis to the recipient site, SPY angiography can also be used prior to inset of the ap. At this point, trimming the areas of hypoperfusion can take place. Using this method has been associated with a signi­cant reduction of the rates of fat necrosis. While rates of partial ap loss have been shown to be decreased in patients who under­went SPY angiography and subsequent ap trimming based on perfusion, these studies were underpowered due to low rates of occurrence [4]. In patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) undergoing autologous breast reconstruction with vascu­larized inguinal lymph node transfer, SPY angiography is a useful tool to identify sentinel lymph nodes of the groin, identify lym­phatic channels, and map recipient vessels. It can be used to iden­tify the appropriate lymph node basin when undergoing autologous
240
https://t.me/medicina_free
breast reconstruction with lymph node transfer. SPY angiography allows surgeons to incorporate lymph nodes adjacent to the pedi­cle during dissection. It can then be used following dissection to assess ap and lymph node perfusion. Finally, it can be used fol­lowing microvascular anastomosis to assess patency [11].
Indocyanine green angiography is also useful in patients with previous abdominal liposuction seeking to undergo autologous breast reconstruction. While previous studies have shown that abdominal-based autologous reconstruction is feasible after lipo­suction, it was once controversial [12]. Studies found that when performed, the surgeon typically used a method of perfusion assess­ment, such as Doppler, angiography, or CT angiography in addition to clinical exam. Casey etal. found that by using indocyanine green angiography intraoperatively and resecting areas of hypoperfusion, rates of partial ap loss and fat necrosis reduced from 71.4% to 0% [12]. Of note, they found no signicant difference in anastomotic complications or total ap loss between patients who underwent clinical evaluation and indocyanine green laser angiography.
Complications associated with autologous breast reconstruction lead to additional surgical interventions, postoperative imaging studies, and follow-up appointments. In a 7-year single-center ret­rospective study of 1000 free aps for breast reconstruction, Hembd etal. found that indocyanine green angiography was independently associated with a decrease in the odds of fat necrosis (OR, 0.38, p = 0.004) [13]. Per single incident of fat necrosis, the studied cohort underwent an additional 0.69 revision provisions, 1.22 imag­ing studies, 0.77 biopsies, and 1.7 additional oncologic ofce visits. They also found an 84.9g higher weight of resected tissue without indocyanine green angiography versus with indocyanine green angiography. Therefore, patient factors may guide the use of indo­cyanine green angiography in breast reconstruction.
A. Turner et al.
Cost-Eectiveness
While surgeons have the ability to use SPY angiography for all breast reconstruction patients, it is not without cost. The cost of successful surgery utilizing SPY angiography is dependent on the
8 Use ofFluorescence Guidance inBreast Reconstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
institution [9, 14]. This cost can be offset by prevention of costs associated with mastectomy necrosis or partial ap failure, espe­cially in high-risk patients. Studies have shown that the use of SPY angiography is only cost-effective in patients who are smok­ers, are obese, and have larger breasts [2]. The use of indocyanine green angiography is associated with savings of $2098.80 for smokers, $5162.30 for patients with a BMI of 30 or more, and $1892.70 for patients with mastectomy weight greater than 800g [2]. Therefore, in high-risk patients undergoing implant-based reconstruction, SPY angiography may be a useful adjunct that not only reduces postoperative complications but also controls overall costs in this patient population. In autologous breast reconstruc­tion, cost-utility analysis by Chatterjee etal. revealed a baseline cost difference of $773.66, a gain in quality-adjusted life years of
0.22, and an incremental cost-utility ratio of $3516.64 per quality­adjusted life year [14]. Overall, SPY angiography is only cost­effective when the complication rate is 5% or greater [14]. Given that the overall complication rates are as high as 41% in autolo­gous breast reconstruction, angiography will be cost-effective for this subset of breast reconstruction patients. Therefore, when determining the cost-effectiveness of SPY angiography, patient factors should be considered for those undergoing implant-based reconstruction. On the other hand, most patients undergoing SPY angiography for autologous reconstruction may not only reap the benets of decreased complications but also experience less nancial burden in the long run with its use.
241
Use inLymphedema Surgery forBreast Reconstruction Patients
The lymphatic system has three fundamental functions, including tissue uid homeostasis, regulation of the immunologic response, and transportation of gastrointestinal lipids. Lymphedema is a chronic, progressive disease of the lymphatic system resulting in uid imbalance and subsequent accumulation of protein-rich interstitial uid. This process results in swelling, inammation, and irreversible changes of the tissue that primarily affect the
242
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. Turner et al.
upper and lower limbs. Lymphedema can be categorized as pri­mary or secondary. Primary lymphedema is caused by intrinsic defects in the development of the lymphatic system and can occur at various stages of life (i.e., congenital lymphedema, lymph­edema praecox, and lymphedema tarda). Secondary lymphedema is caused by extrinsic interruptions in the lymphatic system such as infection, malignancy, or tissue trauma. Lymph node dissection is the most common cause of tissue trauma resulting in secondary lymphedema. Of note, breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is the most common noninfectious secondary lymphedema in the United States that signicantly impacts patients’ quality of life [15]. Therefore, the prevention and treatment of BCRL still remains a challenge. The likelihood of developing BCRL is related to the extent of therapeutic interventions ranging from sentinel lymph node biopsy to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and adjunct radiation. Since the introduction of sentinel lymph node biopsy for surgical staging in 1992 by Drs. Morton and Cochran, the incidence of BCRL has been reduced to 5–7% [16]. However, among patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), the reported incidence of BCRL is approxi­mately 20%. The reported incidence of BCRL is even higher among patients undergoing both ALND and radiotherapy, ranging from 25% to 40% [16].
The clinical manifestations of lymphedema and the time of presentation are variable among patients. The most common early sign is extremity swelling, but occasionally patients report pain and recurrent cellulitis as their primary complaints. Identifying a patient’s stage of lymphedema begins with a thorough clinical examination. While various staging systems have been reported, the most widely accepted staging system is the International Society of Lymphology (ISL) staging system which grades lymphedema based on the clinical ndings and its natural pro­gression [17] (Table 8.1). Subclinical or stage 0 lymphedema refers to an early stage of dysfunctional lymph transport without clinical manifestations. Stage 1 is characterized by reversible edema either with extremity elevation or compression with or without pitting edema. Conversely, in stage 2, lymphedema pres­ents as irreversible pitting edema and some tissue brosis, which
8 Use ofFluorescence Guidance inBreast Reconstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
Table 8.1 International Society of Lymphology staging system. Executive Committee of the International Society of Lymphology. The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema: 2020 Consensus Document of the Inter­national Society of Lymphology. Lymphology 2020; 53:3
International Society of Lymphology lymphedema staging classication Stage Description Pathophysiology Clinical features 0 Subclinical Impaired lymph
transport
I Spontaneously
reversible
II Not
spontaneously reversible
III Lymphostatic
elephantiasis
Early lymph accumulation
Fat hypertrophy and deposition with tissue brosis
Chronic lymphatic stasis and inammation, further brosis and fatty deposition
Swelling not evident
Swelling relieved by limb elevation Pitting may be present
Swelling not improved by limb elevation Pitting edema present with brosis
Swelling not improved by limb elevation Edema nonpitting and wooden hyperkeratotic and verrucous skin changes
243
does not improve with extremity elevation or compression. Finally, stage 3 designates lymphedema that has progressed to irreversible non-pitting edema associated with thick-wooden sub­cutaneous tissue and hyperkeratotic and verrucous skin changes. Additional staging systems have been proposed including Cheng’s Lymphedema affected Grading System, which is based on the cir­cumference differential between affected and unaffected limbs [18] (Table8.2).
While lymphoscintigraphy has been the standard imaging modality for lymphedema, ICG lymphangiography has become a widely utilized tool in this patient population. ICG lymphangiog­raphy is a noninvasive test that allows precise, real-time evalua­tion of the supercial lymphatic drainage with the added advantage of not utilizing radioactive particles. Similar to lymphoscintigra­phy, ICG lymphangiography permits a qualitative evaluation of
244
https://t.me/medicina_free
Table 8.2 Chang’s lymphedema grading system. Patel, KM, Lin, CY, Cheng, MH.A prospective evaluation of lymphedema-specic quality-of-life outcomes following vascularized lymph node transfer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(7):2424–2430. Copyright © 2014 Society of Surgical Oncology
Grade Symptoms Circumferential differentiation Lymphoscintigraphy 0 Reversible <9 Partial occlusion I Mild 10–19 Partial occlusion II Moderate 20–29 Total occlusion III Severe 30–39 Total occlusion IV Very severe >40 Total occlusion
A. Turner et al.
the lymphatic circulation and facilitates staging. There is evidence that ICG lymphangiography is more accurate at detecting early upper extremity lymphedema when compared to lymphoscintig­raphy [4]. Therefore, breast cancer patients at high risk for devel­oping BCRL may benet from early ICG lymphangiography after breast surgery to facilitate early detection of lymphedema prior to measurable volume changes on clinical exam.
ICG lymphangiography involves injecting a uorescent dye intradermally into the distal hand. An infrared light source is then used to stimulate the dye, and visualization is obtained using a camera with an infrared lter allowing dynamic evaluation of lymphatic ow. Flow patterns seen on ICG lymphangiography correlate well with various clinical stages [7]. Flow patterns can be classied as either linear or dermal backow patterns, the latter of which includes a progression from “splash,” then “stardust,” to nally “diffuse” subpatterns. The linear pattern refers to a linear uorescent image produced by the ICG as it travels through nor­mally functioning supercial lymphatic collectors. This pattern is observed in the non-affected limb and in some mild lymphedema cases. In contrast, the dermal backow pattern describes the non­linear images produced as the ICG dye follows the pathologic dermal backow of the lymphatic system, which is found in the more severe lymphedema cases. This backow pattern includes a group of three subpatterns (splash, stardust, and diffuse) that rep­resent the natural progression of the lymphedema. The splash pat­tern consists of scattered areas of shining dye that changes from bright to faint in tortuous lymphatic channels. The stardust pattern
8 Use ofFluorescence Guidance inBreast Reconstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
245
demonstrates a dimly luminous background with spotted areas of higher uorescent signals as lymphatic ow decreases. In the dif­fuse pattern, the dye is widely dispersed with no identiable lym­phatics. Several backow patterns may occur at the same time. Therefore, the indicator of lymphatic function is based on the worst pattern. Recently, a “no ow” pattern was described [4]. In this case, the injected dye does not extend beyond the wrist and there is no linear or backow pattern in the arm.
Identifying ow patterns can guide microsurgical options avail­able. The main goal of lymphedema microsurgery is to restore drain­age of excess interstitial uid. This is in contrast to earlier surgical procedures that involved excision of the brotic and nonfunctional tissues, which are still useful for advanced- staged lymphedema. The main indication for lymphedema microsurgery is early stage lymph­edema prior to adipose deposition and tissue brosis. The three main lymphatic microsurgical procedures are lymphaticovenous anasto­mosis (LVA), vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT), and the combination of microsurgical breast reconstruction with lymph node transfer (known as the Barcelona Cocktail) [19]. The supermi­crosurgical LVA was rst described by Koshima in 2000 and became popular after the introduction of new technology and indocyanine green lymphangiography [20]. In this procedure, several remaining lymphatic channels with linear ow are anastomosed to subdermal veins. Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) was developed in animal studies in the 1990s. In this procedure, a lymph node bed of tissue vascularized by a named pedicle is transferred to a distant location as a free tissue transfer. This is a surgical option that allows restoring uid drainage once LVA is not possible in the setting of absent lymphatic vessels by bringing in new healthy lymph nodes. Commonly used donor sites for lymph node transfer include the submental nodes, supraclavicular nodes, inguinal nodes, lateral tho­racic nodes, or omentum. These are then transferred using standard microsurgery techniques to the affected regions as needed. Additionally, a vascularized lymph node transfer can be combined with free ap breast reconstruction using a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) ap. In this procedure, the supercial ingui­nal lymph nodes are dissected with the DIEP ap and oriented in the axilla during free ap inset (Fig.8.2).
246
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 8.2 Lymph node transfer of inguinal lymph nodes to the axilla during DIEP free ap reconstruction
A. Turner et al.
Technique
The SPY Agent Green is packaged as a sterile lyophilized green powder which contains 25 mg indocyanine green in a 20 ml single- patient use vial [21]. It contains no more than 5% sodium iodide. As previously mentioned, ICG is a water-soluble tricarbo­cyanine dye reconstituted by mixing with sterile water to yield a
2.5 mg/ml solution. The initial injection volume is dependent upon the planned procedure. During the procedure, additional doses may be used but should not exceed 2mg/kg total dose. A larger dose may be required in areas of increased deposits of adi­pose tissue. In pediatric patients, smaller doses may be used based on body weight and age. Of note, a number of psychiatric, neuro­logic, and cardiac drugs are associated with increased clearance and should therefore be documented and communicated with anesthesia in order to optimize dosage. These medications include
8 Use ofFluorescence Guidance inBreast Reconstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
phenobarbital, haloperidol, primidone, heparin, nifedipine, nitro­furantoin, and propranolol. The mixture is shaken slowly until all precipitation is resolved. ICG is unstable in aqueous solution and once reconstituted, it must be used within 6h. It should be dis­carded if precipitation is noted in the vial and the precipitation does not dissolve with gentle shaking. Following injection, a nor­mal saline bolus should be administered in order to minimize the dilution of the dye in the slow-owing venous system. The operat­ing room lights should then be turned down for improved visual­ization of images.
247
ICG Angiography forBreast Mastectomy Flaps
Steps for use are outlined below.
1. Prepare and drape imaging equipment in a sterile manner.
2. Reconstitute 25mg of ICG in 10ml of sterile water, yielding a
2.5mg/ml solution.
3. Shake the solution gently to mix. (If precipitation is present,
continue to shake gently until the ICG is dissolved. If precipi­tation persists, discard the solution and prepare a new solu­tion.)
4. Inject 2ml of the solution via peripheral IV.
5. Flush with 10cc normal saline.
6. Turn down the operating room lights and use the imaging
device to evaluate tissue perfusion of mastectomy aps. Areas of hyperintensity have higher rates of tissue perfusion, while areas of hypointensity have poor tissue perfusion. Quantication of tissue perfusion is facilitated by percentages relative to the highest perfused areas displayed as an onlay (Fig.8.3).
7. Use a marking pen to demarcate areas of inadequate tissue per-
fusion.
8. Perform surgical excision of hypoperfused areas
accordingly.
248
ab
cd
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 8.3 ICG angiography perfusion assessment of a breast mastectomy ap using SPY uorescence imaging technology (SPY Elite Fluorescence Imag­ing System, SPY-Q tissue perfusion quantication software, NOVADAQ, now part of Stryker). To quantify the tissue perfusion of the ap, the surgeon has placed a reference marker on healthy well-perfused tissue away from and of the same type as the surgical area (100%), and perfusion in other areas is shown as a percentage relative to this reference (e.g., 44%). A contour can be mapped to delineate the area which is less than a selected % perfusion of the reference. This information can guide surgical excision of hypoperfused areas. Use of SPY angiography to assess perfusion of mastectomy aps. (a) Mastectomy aps prior to SPY angiography. (b) Tissue perfusion quantied by percentage. (c) Use of skin marker to outline area of low tissue perfusion prior to staples. (d) Perfusion pattern after stapling aps
A. Turner et al.
ICG Angiography forLymphaticovenous Anastomosis
Steps for use are outlined below.
1. Prepare and drape imaging equipment in a sterile manner.
2. Reconstitute 25mg of ICG in 10ml of sterile water, yielding a 2.5mg/ml solution.
3. Shake the solution gently to mix. (If precipitation is present, continue to shake gently until the ICG is dissolved. If pre­cipitation persists, discard the solution and prepare a new solution.)
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025