Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 715 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
16 Мб
Скачать
8 Use ofFluorescence Guidance inBreast Reconstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
249
4. Inject 0.2 ml of ICG intradermally into web spaces of the distal hand (Fig.8.4).
5. Turn down the operating room lights and use the imaging device to evaluate the lymphatic ow pattern.
6. Mark and select the linear ow pattern segment on the skin with a skin marker.
7. Identify and mark “dark crossing areas” that may indicate crossing veins which are possible LVA locations. Injection
0.3ml of lymphazurin blue into the dermis several centime­ters distal to the incision site may assist with visualization of the lymphatic channels.
8. Prepare and drape the extremity.
9. Under the microscope, make a supercial 1.5–2 cm trans­verse incision over the selected lymphatic vessel, which is located in the supercial subcutaneous tissue.
10. Incise to the deep layer of the dermis using ne dissecting instruments (Fig.8.5).
11. Once the lymphatic channel and adjacent venule have been identied, anastomosis is carried out via a variety of tech­niques (Fig.8.6).
12. A new injection of lymphazurin blue or ICG lymphangiogra­phy can be used to conrm the patency of LVA.
Fig. 8.4 Injection of ICG dye into webspaces of the hand
250
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 8.5 Microsurgical instruments utilized for lymphaticovenous anasto­mosis
A. Turner et al.
Contraindications andAdverse Reactions
Indocyanine green can be used in adults and pediatric patients, except for those less than 1month of age. Indocyanine green con­tains sodium iodide and is contraindicated in patients with iodine hypersensitivity due to anaphylaxis or other allergic reactions that may occur. There are very few reports of anaphylactic reaction to ICG, with an incidence of 1in 40,000. In patients with renal fail­ure or uremia and those on dialysis, ICG should be used with caution due to reports of anaphylactoid reactions including dys­pnea, palpitations, anxiety, nausea, edema, and hypotension. The clear mechanism is unknown, but patients with anaphylactoid reactions had higher eosinophil counts than those who did not.
ab
cd
8 Use ofFluorescence Guidance inBreast Reconstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
While not a contraindication to ICG use, the SPY Agent Green contains iodine, and this could reduce the iodine binding capacity of thyroid tissue for at least a week after administration. Therefore, patients who are scheduled to undergo radioactive iodine uptake studies should not do so for at least 1week following ICG admin­istration. Finally, while there are no adverse events associated
251
Fig. 8.6 Lymphaticovenous anastomosis techniques. (a) Y-shaped LVA. (b) Lambda-shaped LVA. (c) K-shaped LVA. (d) Pi-shaped LVA. (e)X-shaped LVA
252
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. Turner et al.
Fig. 8.6 (continued)
e
with pregnancy or breastfeeding, use of ICG in these patient pop­ulations should be used with caution. ICG is a US FDA category C drug with animal studies showing an adverse effect on the fetus. There are no well-controlled studies in humans nor is there con-
8 Use ofFluorescence Guidance inBreast Reconstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
trolled data in human pregnancy. The small studies published have not reported major birth defects, miscarriage, or adverse maternal or fetal outcomes. Additionally, there has been no report of placental transfer of ICG or detectable levels of ICG in fetal blood or umbilical vein blood after ICG administration in the pregnant mother. There is currently no data on the presence of ICG in human milk or the effects on milk production.
Adverse reactions can be mild, moderate, or severe. Mild reac­tions include ushing, syncope, weakness, headache, urticaria, anxiety, vomiting, and diaphoresis. Moderate reactions include edema, hypotension, erythema, wheezing, sinus tachycardia, pal­pitations, dyspnea, and confusion. Severe reactions include ana­phylactic shock, anaphylactoid reactions, respiratory arrest, cyanosis, cardiac arrest, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, and visual impairment. There have been reports of anaphylaxis, urticaria, and death with use of this product, and therefore, careful monitor­ing is important and cardiopulmonary resuscitation equipment and personnel should always be available. Patients should be warned of the risks and told to seek medical attention if they develop signs of anaphylaxis such as difculty breathing, tongue or throat swelling, hives, itching, ushed or pale skin, low blood pressure, or a weak pulse or rapid pulse [21].
253
Conclusion
Since the introduction of indocyanine green (ICG) angiography to medical use in the mid-1950s, it has become a reliable and popu­lar method to assess tissue perfusion. However, it was not until 1999 that it was used in plastic surgery as a tool to assess ap perfusion in burn reconstruction. Since then, it has had multiple applications throughout plastic surgery, including the manage­ment of diabetic ulcers, assessment of ap perfusion, lymph ow reconstruction, and breast reconstruction, with experimental use in face transplant preoperative planning. This chapter serves an overview of ICG in breast reconstruction encompassing mastec­tomy ap perfusion, free ap viability, and breast cancer­associated lymphedema.
254
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. Turner et al.
ICG angiography provides surgeons with objective visual evi­dence of poor perfusion that may not manifest clinically until sev­eral days postoperatively. Therefore, the use of ICG has been found to reduce rates of mastectomy skin necrosis, partial ap loss, and fat necrosis by guiding intraoperative decision-making, reducing patient costs associated with complications manage­ment, and improving patient satisfaction. Its short half-life enables repeated examinations via multiple injections without reaching toxic levels, vital to plastic surgery applications.
ICG lymphangiography is a noninvasive test that allows pre­cise, real-time evaluation of supercial lymphatic drainage with­out utilizing radioactive particles. ICG lymphography permits a qualitative assessment of the lymphatic circulation, facilitates its staging, and guides the intraoperative restoration of the lymph ow. Moreover, there is evidence that ICG lymphangiography is more accurate at detecting early upper extremity lymphedema when compared to lymphoscintigraphy and before measurable volume changes on clinical exams.
Overall, applications of ICG in plastic surgery have expanded over the past two decades with a focus on angiography and lym­phangiography. In this chapter, we have focused on its use in breast reconstruction, which has shown to be expansive. ICG enables intra­operative tissue assessment via direct visualization that improves decision-making with the goal of improving overall patient satisfac­tion and outcomes. While it is a relatively new technology in the eld of plastic surgery, it has shown potential for improving the overall operative experience and associated outcomes.
References
1. Phillips BT, Munabi NCO, Roeder RA, Ascherman JA, Guo L, Zenn MR.The role of intraoperative perfusion assessment: what is the current state and how can i use it in my practice? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:731–41.
2. Phillips BT, Lanier ST, Conkling N, Wang ED, Dagum AB, Ganz JC, etal. Intraoperative perfusion techniques can accurately predict mastec­tomy skin ap necrosis in breast reconstruction: results of a prospective trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(5):778e–88e.
8 Use ofFluorescence Guidance inBreast Reconstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
3. Rinker B.A comparison of methods to assess mastectomy ap viability in skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction: a prospective cohort study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:395–401.
4. Akita S, Nakamura R, Yamamoto N, Tokumoto H, Ishigaki T, Yamaji Y, et al. Early detection of lymphatic disorder and treatment for lymph­edema following breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(2):192e–202e.
5. Momeni A, Sheckter C.Intraoperative laser-assisted indocyanine green imaging can reduce the rate of fat necrosis in microsurgical breast recon­struction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(3):507E–13E.
6. Bilezikian JA, Tenzel PL, Bebb GG, Kays CR.The broad application of Prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix drape and uorescent imaging in a community setting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(2):291–300.
7. Yamamoto T, Yamamoto N, Doi K, Oshima A, Yoshimatsu H, Todokoro T, etal. Indocyanine green–enhanced lymphography for upper extremity lymphedema: a novel severity staging system using dermal backow pat­terns. Plast Reconstr Surg [Internet]. 2011;128(4):941–7. Available from:
https://journals.lww.com/plasreconsurg/Fulltext/2011/10000/ Indocyanine_Green_Enhanced_Lymphography_for_Upper.26.aspx.
8. Moyer HR, Losken A.Predicting mastectomy skin ap necrosis with Indocyanine green angiography: the gray area dened. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(5):1043–8.
9. Kanuri A, Liu AS, Guo L. Whom should we SPY? A cost analysis of laser-assisted indocyanine green angiography in prevention of mastec­tomy skin ap necrosis during prosthesis-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(4):448e–54e.
10. Varela R, Casado-Sanchez C, Zarbakhsh S, Diez J, Hernandez-Godoy J, Landin L.Outcomes of DIEP ap and uorescent angiography: a ran­domized controlled clinical trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(1):1–10.
11. Chattha A, Bucknor A, Chen AD, Lee BT, Lin SJ. Indocyanine green angiography use in breast reconstruction: a national analysis of outcomes and cost in 110,320 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141(4):825–32.
12. Casey WJ, Connolly KA, Nanda A, Rebecca AM, Perdikis G, Smith AA.Indocyanine green laser angiography improves deep inferior epigas­tric perforator ap outcomes following abdominal suction lipectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(3):491e–7e.
13. Hembd AS, Yan J, Zhu H, Haddock NT, Teotia SS.Intraoperative assess­ment of DIEP ap breast reconstruction using indocyanine green angiog­raphy: reduction of fat necrosis, resection volumes, and postoperative surveillance. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;146(1):1e–10e.
14. Chatterjee A, Krishnan NM, Van Vliet MM, Powell SG, Rosen JM, Ridgway EB.A comparison of free autologous breast reconstruction with and without the use of laser-assisted indocyanine green angiography: a cost- effectiveness analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(5):693e–701e.
255
256
https://t.me/medicina_free
15. Yamamoto T, Iida T, Yoshimatsu H, Fuse Y, Hayashi A, Yamamoto N.Lymph ow restoration after tissue replantation and transfer: impor­tance of lymph axiality and possibility of lymph ow reconstruction without lymph node transfer or lymphatic anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(3):796–804.
16. DiSipio T, Rye S, Newman B, Hayes S. Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(6):500–15.
17. International Society of Lymphology. The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema: 2013 consensus document of the International Society of Lymphology. Lymphology. 2013;46(1):1–11.
18. Patel KM, Lin C-Y, Cheng M-H.A prospective evaluation of lymphedema­specic quality-of-life outcomes following vascularized lymph node transfer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(7):2424–30.
19. Yamamoto T, Yamamoto N, Yoshimatsu H, Narushima M, Koshima I.Factors associated with lymphosclerosis: an analysis on 962 lymphatic vessels. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:734–41.
20. Pandey SK, Fahradyan V, Orfahli LM, Chen WF.Plastic and Aesthetic Research Supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis vs. vascu­larized lymph vessel transplant-technical optimization and when to per­form which. Plast Aesthet Res. 2021;8:47. https://doi.
org/10.20517/2347- 9264.2021.61.
21. Spy Elite SNTUC.Product information.
A. Turner et al.
Use ofFluorescence
https://t.me/medicina_free
Guidance inPlastic andReconstructive Surgery: Skin andMuscle Flaps
ZacharyA.Koenig, CristianeM.Ueno, JackJ.Gelman, andKerriWoodberry
Introduction
Fluorescence angiography using indocyanine green is a valuable tool to assess ap viability, both for skin aps and muscle aps. Image-guided surgery is a technique that uses optical imaging to assess tissues during reconstructive surgery in plastic surgery. Examples of these technologies include indocyanine green (ICG) angiography, dynamic infrared thermography (DIRT), and photo­spectrometry. One of the most common methods involves the use of near-infrared (NIR) uorescence imaging that requires an injection of a uorescent dye that can be captured using NIR cam­eras. ICG is the most used dye, and it has multiple indications including utilization to identify tissue perfusion, vessels, nerves, and lymphatic drainage.
9
Z. A. Koenig · J. J. Gelman · K. Woodberry Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA
C. M. Ueno (*) Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 N. Szoka et al. (eds.), The SAGES Manual of Fluorescence-Guided Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40685-0_9
257
258
https://t.me/medicina_free
Z. A. Koenig et al.
The use of image-guided technologies such as ICG angiogra­phy allows detection of areas of poor or no blood perfusion that is often not clearly visible to the human eye. Its applications have been described in evaluation of orthopedic, trauma, military, and vascular injuries as well as plastic surgery reconstructions. Traditionally, clinical judgment has been one of the most accept­able parameters to determine tissue viability. Other methods of assessment include subjective assessment of skin or tissue color, capillary rell, ap temperature, tissue bleeding, prick tests, Doppler ultrasound, and use of tactile sensation. The use of ICG angiography allows an objective measure of perfusion and tissue viability.
Images provided by NIR cameras can provide real-time infor­mation in the operating room which is an advantage for surgical planning. For example, uorescence angiography can be used for identication of lymphatic vessels in lymphatic anastomosis, identication of lymph nodes during lymph node dissection, eval­uation of patency of a vessel anastomosis, or evaluation of tissue perfusion.
According to Burns etal. (level of evidence 3), the use of NIR technologies intraoperatively has the potential to provide data that can improve intraoperative decisions about flap design with subsequent better outcomes [1]. In another study group (level of evidence 3), authors compared three technolo­gies and their capability to “predict” tissue perfusion. Their findings showed that the intraoperative sensitivity for ICG angiography was 90.9% (95% CI: 77.5–100) with an accuracy of 98.6% (95% CI: 97.6–99.7), sensitivity for DIRT was 33% (95% CI: 11.3–64.6) with specificity of 100% (95% CI 84.9–
100) and accuracy of 80% (95% CI: 71.2–89.7), and sensitiv­ity for photo-spectrometry was 92% (95% CI: 72.4–98.6) with specificity of 100% (95% CI: 98.8–100) and accuracy of 100% (95% CI: 98.7–100) [2].
The advantages of ICG are its short half-life (3–4 min in healthy adults) which allows multiple runs in one single surgery without exceeding the maximum dosage, its efcacy in predicting clinical outcomes for partial or total tissue necrosis, and its evalu­ation of maximal size of a ap with delineation between the zones
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025