Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 715 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
16 Мб
Скачать
188
https://t.me/medicina_free
19. Alander JT, Kaartinen I, Laakso A, Pätilä T, Spillmann T, Tuchin VV, etal. A review of indocyanine green uorescent imaging in surgery. Int J Biomed Imaging. 2012;2012:940585. https://doi.
org/10.1155/2012/940585.
20. Desmettre T, Devoisselle JM, Mordon S. Fluorescence properties and metabolic features of indocyanine green (ICG) as related to angiography. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000;45(1):15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-
6257(00)00123- 5.
21. Dudley NE.Methylene blue for rapid identication of the parathyroids. Br Med J. 1971;3(5776):680–1. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.3.5776.680.
22. Khan MA, North AP, Chadwick DR. Prolonged postoperative altered mental status after methylene blue infusion during parathyroidectomy: a case report and review of the literature. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89(2):W9–11. https://doi.org/10.1308/147870807x160434.
23. Enny L, Ramakant P, Singh KR, Rana C, Garg S, Mishra AK.Efcacy of uorescein green dye in assessing intra-operative parathyroid gland vas­cularity and predicting Post-thyroidectomy hypocalcaemia- a novel pro­spective cohort study. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2020;24(5):446–51.
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijem.IJEM_499_20.
24. Prosst RL, Weiss J, Hupp L, Willeke F, Post S.Fluorescence-guided min­imally invasive parathyroidectomy: clinical experience with a novel intra­operative detection technique for parathyroid glands. World J Surg. 2010;34(9):2217–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268- 010- 0621- 2.
25. Edafe O, Antakia R, Laskar N, Uttley L, Balasubramanian SP.Systematic review and meta-analysis of predictors of post-thyroidectomy hypocal­caemia. Br J Surg. 2014;101(4):307–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9384.
26. Rosato L, Avenia N, Bernante P, De Palma M, Gulino G, Nasi PG, etal. Complications of thyroid surgery: analysis of a multicentric study on 14,934 patients operated on in Italy over 5 years. World J Surg. 2004;28(3):271–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268- 003- 6903- 1.
27. Pepe J, Colangelo L, Biamonte F, Sonato C, Danese VC, Cecchetti V, et al. Diagnosis and management of hypocalcemia. Endocrine. 2020;69(3):485–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020- 020- 02324- 2.
28. Bove-Fenderson E, Mannstadt M. Hypocalcemic disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;32(5):639–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
beem.2018.05.006.
29. Hujoel IA.The association between serum calcium levels and Chvostek sign: a population-based study. Neurol Clin Pract. 2016;6(4):321–8.
https://doi.org/10.1212/cpj.0000000000000270.
30. Falco J, Dip F, Quadri P, de la Fuente M, Rosenthal R.Cutting edge in thyroid surgery: autouorescence of parathyroid glands. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;223(2):374–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.04.049.
31. Dip F, Falco J, Verna S, Prunello M, Loccisano M, Quadri P, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing White light with near-infrared autouorescence for parathyroid gland identication during Total thy-
J. Matson et al.
6 Use ofFluorescence Guidance inEndocrine Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
roidectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2019;228(5):744–51. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.044.
32. Benmiloud F, Godiris-Petit G, Gras R, Gillot JC, Turrin N, Penaranda G, etal. Association of Autouorescence-Based Detection of the parathyroid glands during Total thyroidectomy with postoperative hypocalcemia risk: results of the PARAFLUO multicenter randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(2):106–12. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4613.
33. Kim YS, Erten O, Kahramangil B, Aydin H, Donmez M, Berber E.The impact of near infrared uorescence imaging on parathyroid function after total thyroidectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2020;122(5):973–9. https://doi.
org/10.1002/jso.26098.
34. Di Marco AN, Palazzo FF.Near-infrared autouorescence in thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Gland Surg. 2020;9(Suppl 2):S136–s46. https://doi.
org/10.21037/gs.2020.01.04.
35. DiMarco A, Chotalia R, Bloxham R, McIntyre C, Tolley N, Palazzo FF. Does uoroscopy prevent inadvertent parathyroidectomy in thyroid surgery? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019;101(7):508–13. https://doi.
org/10.1308/rcsann.2019.0065.
36. Vidal Fortuny J, Belfontali V, Sadowski SM, Karenovics W, Guigard S, Triponez F.Parathyroid gland angiography with indocyanine green uo­rescence to predict parathyroid function after thyroid surgery. Br J Surg. 2016;103(5):537–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10101.
37. Jin H, Dong Q, He Z, Fan J, Liao K, Cui M.Application of a uorescence imaging system with Indocyanine green to protect the parathyroid gland intraoperatively and to predict postoperative Parathyroidism. Adv Ther. 2018;35(12):2167–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325- 018- 0834- 6.
38. Zaidi N, Bucak E, Yazici P, Soundararajan S, Okoh A, Yigitbas H, etal. The feasibility of indocyanine green uorescence imaging for identifying and assessing the perfusion of parathyroid glands during total thyroidec­tomy. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113(7):775–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/
jso.24237.
39. Spartalis E, Ntokos G, Georgiou K, Zografos G, Tsourouis G, Dimitroulis D, etal. Intraoperative Indocyanine green (ICG) angiography for the identication of the parathyroid glands: current evidence and future perspectives. In Vivo. 2020;34(1):23–32. https://doi.org/10.21873/
invivo.11741.
40. Vidal Fortuny J, Sadowski SM, Belfontali V, Guigard S, Poncet A, Ris F, etal. Randomized clinical trial of intraoperative parathyroid gland angi­ography with indocyanine green uorescence predicting parathyroid function after thyroid surgery. Br J Surg. 2018;105(4):350–7. https://doi.
org/10.1002/bjs.10783.
41. Rudin AV, McKenzie TJ, Thompson GB, Farley DR, Lyden ML. Evaluation of parathyroid glands with Indocyanine green uores­cence angiography after thyroidectomy. World J Surg. 2019;43(6):1538–
43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268- 019- 04909- z.
189
190
https://t.me/medicina_free
42. Razavi AC, Ibraheem K, Haddad A, Saparova L, Shalaby H, Abdelgawad M, etal. Efcacy of indocyanine green uorescence in predicting para­thyroid vascularization during thyroid surgery. Head Neck. 2019;41(9):3276–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.25837.
43. Hartl DOR, Guerlain J, Breuskin I, Abbaci M, Laplace-Builhé C.Intraoperative parathyroid gland identication using autouorescence: pearls and pitfalls. World J Surg Surg Res. 2019;2(1):1166.
44. Demarchi MS, Seeliger B, Lifante JC, Alesina PF, Triponez F.Fluorescence image-guided surgery for thyroid cancer: utility for pre­venting hypoparathyroidism. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(15):3792. https://
doi.org/10.3390/cancers13153792.
45. Matson J, Lwin TM, Bouvet M.Rapid intraoperative perfusion assess­ment of parathyroid adenomas with ICG using a wide-eld portable hand-held uorescence imaging system. Am J Surg. 2021;223:686.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.07.027.
46. Barbieri D, Indelicato P, Vinciguerra A, Di Marco F, Formenti AM, Trimarchi M, etal. Autouorescence and Indocyanine green in thyroid surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2021;131(7):1683–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.29297.
47. Bunch PM, Kelly HR.Preoperative imaging techniques in primary hyper­parathyroidism: a review. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;144(10):929–37. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2018.1671.
48. Feo MLD, Colagrande S, Biagini C, Tonarelli A, Bisi G, Vaggelli L, etal. Parathyroid glands: combination of 99mTc MIBI scintigraphy and US for demonstration of parathyroid glands and nodules. Radiology. 2000;214(2):393–402. https://doi.org/10.1148/
radiology.214.2.r00fe04393.
49. Haber RS, Kim CK, Inabnet WB.Ultrasonography for preoperative local­ization of enlarged parathyroid glands in primary hyperparathyroidism: comparison with (99m)technetium sestamibi scintigraphy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2002;57(2):241–9. https://doi.
org/10.1046/j.1365- 2265.2002.01583.x.
50. Hamidi M, Sullivan M, Hunter G, Hamberg L, Cho NL, Gawande AA, etal. 4D-CT is superior to ultrasound and Sestamibi for localizing recur­rent parathyroid disease. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(5):1403–9. https://
doi.org/10.1245/s10434- 018- 6367- z.
51. McWade MA, Sanders ME, Broome JT, Solórzano CC, Mahadevan­Jansen A.Establishing the clinical utility of autouorescence spectros­copy for parathyroid detection. Surgery. 2016;159(1):193–202. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.06.047.
52. Norlén O, Wang KC, Tay YK, Johnson WR, Grodski S, Yeung M, et al. No need to abandon focused parathyroidectomy: a multicenter study of long-term outcome after surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism. Ann Surg. 2015;261(5):991–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/
sla.0000000000000715.
J. Matson et al.
6 Use ofFluorescence Guidance inEndocrine Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
53. Demarchi MS, Karenovics W, Bédat B, De Vito C, Triponez F. Autouorescence pattern of parathyroid adenomas. BJS Open. 2021;5(1):zraa047. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraa047.
54. Chakedis JM, Maser C, Brumund KT, Bouvet M. Indocyanine green uorescence- guided redo parathyroidectomy. BMJ Case Rep. 2015;2015:bcr2015211778. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr- 2015- 211778.
55. DeLong JC, Ward EP, Lwin TM, Brumund KT, Kelly KJ, Horgan S, etal. Indocyanine green uorescence-guided parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism. Surgery. 2018;163(2):388–92. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.08.018.
56. Di Meo G, Karampinis I, Gerken A, Lammert A, Pellicani S, Nowak K.Indocyanine green uorescence angiography can guide intraoperative localization during parathyroid surgery. Scand J Surg. 2019;110:1457496919877581. https://doi.
org/10.1177/1457496919877581.
57. Sound S, Okoh A, Yigitbas H, Yazici P, Berber E.Utility of Indocyanine green uorescence imaging for intraoperative localization in reoperative parathyroid surgery. Surg Innov. 2019;26(6):774–9. https://doi.
org/10.1177/1553350615613450.
58. Zaidi N, Bucak E, Okoh A, Yazici P, Yigitbas H, Berber E.The utility of indocyanine green near infrared uorescent imaging in the identication of parathyroid glands during surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113(7):771–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24240.
59. Cui L, Gao Y, Yu H, Li M, Wang B, Zhou T, etal. Intraoperative parathy­roid localization with near-infrared uorescence imaging using Indocyanine green during total parathyroidectomy for secondary hyper­parathyroidism. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):8193. https://doi.org/10.1038/
s41598- 017- 08347- 6.
60. Vidal Fortuny J, Guigard S, Diaper J, Karenovics W, Triponez F.Subtotal parathyroidectomy under Indocyanine green angiography. VideoEndocrinology. 2016;3(1):ve.2015.0056. https://doi.org/10.1089/
ve.2015.0056.
61. Coste T, Caiazzo R, Torres F, Vantyghem MC, Carnaille B, Pattou F, etal. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy by transabdominal lateral approach: 20 years of experience. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(7):2743–51. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s00464- 016- 4830- 0.
62. Sommerey S, Foroghi Y, Chiapponi C, Baumbach SF, Hallfeldt KK, Ladurner R, etal. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy—10-year experience at a teaching hospital. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015;400(3):341–7. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s00423- 015- 1287- x.
63. Obermeyer RJ, Knauer EM, Millie MP, Ojeda H, Peters MB Jr, Sweeney JF. Intravenous methylene blue as an aid to intraoperative localization and removal of the adrenal glands during laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Am J Surg. 2003;186(5):531–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amj-
surg.2003.07.011.
191
192
https://t.me/medicina_free
64. Manny TB, Pompeo AS, Hemal AK.Robotic partial adrenalectomy using indocyanine green dye with near-infrared imaging: the initial clinical experience. Urology. 2013;82(3):738–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urol-
ogy.2013.03.074.
65. Ashitate Y, Levitz A, Park MH, Hyun H, Venugopal V, Park G, et al. Endocrine-specic NIR uorophores for adrenal gland targeting. Chem Commun (Camb). 2016;52(67):10305–8. https://doi.org/10.1039/
c6cc03845j.
66. Moore EC, Berber E.Fluorescence techniques in adrenal surgery. Gland Surg. 2019;8(Suppl 1):S22–s7. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2019.03.01.
67. DeLong JC, Chakedis JM, Hosseini A, Kelly KJ, Horgan S, Bouvet M.Indocyanine green (ICG) uorescence-guided laparoscopic adrenal­ectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112(6):650–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/
jso.24057.
68. Colvin J, Zaidi N, Berber E. The utility of indocyanine green uores­cence imaging during robotic adrenalectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2016;114(2):153–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24296.
69. Arora E, Bhandarwar A, Wagh A, Gandhi S, Patel C, Gupta S, etal. Role of indo-cyanine green (ICG) uorescence in laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a retrospective review of 55 cases. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(11):4649–57.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464- 018- 6309- 7.
70. Kahramangil B, Kose E, Berber E.Characterization of uorescence pat­terns exhibited by different adrenal tumors: determining the indications for indocyanine green use in adrenalectomy. Surgery. 2018;164(5):972–
7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.06.012.
71. Lerchenberger M, Gündogar U, Al Arabi N, Gallwas JKS, Stepp H, Hallfeldt KKJ, etal. Indocyanine green uorescence imaging during par­tial adrenalectomy. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(5):2050–5. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s00464- 019- 06985- 7.
72. Crawford KL, Pacheco FV, Lee YJ, Hom M, Rosenthal EL, Nguyen QT, etal. A scoping review of ongoing uorescence-guided surgery clinical trials in otolaryngology. Laryngoscope. 2021;132:36. https://doi.
org/10.1002/lary.29891.
J. Matson et al.
Use ofFluorescence
https://t.me/medicina_free
Guidance inBariatric Surgery
EdmundB.Chen, MarkA.Burroughs, AndreaTrinh, SachinKukreja, andKeriA.Seymour
Introduction
Bariatric surgery is a durable treatment for morbid obesity with long-term resolution of obesity-related diseases. In the United States, the recommendations for bariatric surgery are based on the National Institutes of Health guidelines from 1991. The indication for surgery is a body mass index (BMI) greater or equal to 35kg/ m2 with an associated obesity-related comorbidity, or a BMI of greater or equal to 40kg/m2 [1]. The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at
https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3- 031- 40685- 0_7.
7
E. B. Chen · K. A. Seymour (*) Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA e-mail: keri.seymour@duke.edu
M. A. Burroughs · A. Trinh Department of Surgery, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
S. Kukreja Department of Surgery, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
Dallas-Fort Worth Bariatrics and General Surgery, Dallas, TX, USA
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 N. Szoka et al. (eds.), The SAGES Manual of Fluorescence-Guided Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40685-0_7
193
194
https://t.me/medicina_free
(RYGB) and vertical banded gastroplasty were the two approved bariatric procedures when these guidelines were rst imple­mented. According to the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS), an estimated 256,000 bariatric pro­cedures were performed in 2019. Of these procedures, sleeve gas­trectomy (SG) comprised 60% of all bariatric surgeries performed, RYGB was 18%, biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS) was 1%, and revisional bariatric surgery constituted 17% of all procedures [2]. This chapter will review the indications and technique of both primary and revisional bariatric surgery and describe how intraoperative ICG is utilized during these surgeries.
E. B. Chen et al.
Primary Bariatric Surgery
Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG)
The SG was initially performed in 1999 as the rst stage of a BPD/DS operation for patients with super morbid obesity [3]. The intestinal bypass was reportedly easier and safer to perform at the second stage, after patients lost weight. Ultimately, some patients were able to achieve substantial weight loss with the SG alone. The SG became a separate procedure and acquired a unique com­mon procedural terminology code in 2011 [4]. The benets of SG include an average of 55% excess weight loss (%EWL) [5]. Percent EWL is dened as:
%EWL=(Weight loss/Excess weight)×100 Excess weight=Baseline weightIdeal weight.
The denition of ideal weight can differ, yet a BMI of 2kg/m2
is commonly applied [6].
The SG may be preferable to other primary bariatric surgeries for specic patients. The International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement recommends SG for transplant candi­dates, patients with inammatory bowel disease, and elderly patients. In addition, SG is commonly performed for adolescent patients undergoing bariatric surgery [7, 8]. The SG results in
7 Use ofFluorescence Guidance inBariatric Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
fewer vitamin and mineral deciencies and is technically easier to perform since there is no anastomosis. There is no risk of mar­ginal ulcers or internal hernias associated with SG like the risk associated with the RYGB and BPD/DS [9].
A notable disadvantage for SG is the possibility of worsening gastroesophageal reux disease (GERD), or the incidence of de novo reux occurring in 5–21% of post-SG patients [10, 11]. Therefore, the International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel views the preoperative presence of Barrett’s esophagus as a con­traindication to performing SG [7]. In addition, SG may result in less robust weight loss and weight recidivism, when compared to other primary bariatric procedures [12, 13].
195
Technique ofSleeve Gastrectomy
After gaining intraperitoneal access, the SG procedure starts with mobilization of the greater omentum via hemostatic division of both the gastrocolic and gastrosplenic ligaments. The fundus is fully mobilized, and the left crus is cleared of peritoneal attach­ments to expose the angle of His. If encountered, a hiatal hernia is reduced, and the hiatus is repaired to prevent migration of the sleeve stomach into the mediastinum. A gastric calibration tube (typically 34 to 40 French) is then passed into the lumen of the stomach to prevent narrowing at the incisura and establish sym­metry of the SG.Serial staple res create a long staple line start­ing approximately 3cm to 5cm proximal from the pylorus and ending lateral to the angle of His. A leak test is performed based on surgeon preference and may utilize air insufation, methylene blue, or indocyanine green (ICG) [8].
Incidence and Management of Leaks After Sleeve Gastrectomy
The leak rate after SG is low at 2.4% according to a meta-analysis of 29 publications, including 4888 patients [14]. Leak after SG is associated with a varied range of presentations and subsequent clinical sequala. According to the International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement, leaks after SG are classied as acute, early, late, and chronic [7]. Acute leaks are recognized within 7 days of the SG procedure. Early leaks are dened as
196
https://t.me/medicina_free
E. B. Chen et al.
those that occur between 1week and 6weeks after SG.Late leaks are observed 6weeks after the SG and a chronic leak persists after 12weeks [7]. A gastrointestinal leak that is not well-contained, with dissemination into the abdominal or pleural (typically left) cavity, and with major systemic clinical manifestations will require immediate intervention [7].
Leaks after SG are generally related to mechanical causes or from tissue ischemia. Mechanical causes for a leak are often linked to incomplete staple formation. Some surgeons use the same staple height for the entire sleeve gastrectomy while other surgeons vary the staple height based on location and tissue char­acteristics [15]. The International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement stated it is not appropriate to use a staple height of less than 1.5mm for any portion of the SG [7]. Operative technique is especially important when understanding the mechanical causes of sleeve leak. A smaller bougie size and use of buttressing materials are associated with increased rates of leak after SG [16, 17]. Narrowing the sleeve at the incisura will also create high intraluminal pressures and lead to disruption of the staple line. As esophageal tissue lacks serosa, inclusion of this weaker tissue into the staple line is another potential source of leak after SG.Depending on the mechanism, leaks that are the result of mechanical issues may manifest as early postoperative day 1 or 2 [18].
In contrast, leaks due to tissue ischemia typically occur later, around the fth to seventh day after surgery [18]. Poor tissue per­fusion and resultant ischemia can occur from overly aggressive dissection and devascularization of the resultant stomach. In addi­tion, inadvertent thermal injury to the stomach during mobiliza­tion may also result in tissue ischemia and an eventual leak.
Gastrointestinal leak after SG is an uncommon and chal­lenging complication to manage. Treatment options are indi­vidualized to the patient and based on location, timing of presentation, and systemic signs of illness. Patients may pres­ent with signs of fulminant sepsis, diffuse intra-abdominal uid, well-contained abscesses, an associated stula, or mini­mal clinical signs [19]. Conversative methods for controlling SG leak include antimicrobial therapy, percutaneous drainage
7 Use ofFluorescence Guidance inBariatric Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
of intra-abdominal collections, and nutritional support often in the form of parenteral nutrition. Management of SG leaks via a conservative approach was successful in 82% of patients [19]. If supportive measures fail, the next step includes endo­scopic therapies that use covered stents, clips, endoluminal vacuum therapy, or internal drainage [19]. In the appropriate patient, these endoscopic therapies can be highly effective. In a meta-analysis, endoscopic stent placement had an initial suc­cess rate of 62% [19]. Endoscopic internal drainage was suc­cessful for 85% of patients [20].
Surgical intervention is the recommended initial management for toxic and symptomatic patients and necessary if the above conservative and endoscopic methods fail. Surgery can be per­formed both via either laparoscopic or open techniques. Perito­neal washout with drain placement is the procedure most often performed during the management of the acute SG leak [19]. In the appropriate patients, surgery was successful as the initial man­agement of acute SG leak in 76% cases. Unfortunately, surgical management was associated with a 9.7% mortality rate [19]. In the chronic setting for unresolved leak with a chronic stula, sur­gery often entails resection of the stula tissue and conversion to RYGB or esophagojejunostomy.
197
Intraoperative Application ofICG During Sleeve Gastrectomy
Prevention of a leak after SG is of intense interest to bariatric surgeons, and uorescence imaging using ICG has emerged as a promising imaging modality. Given the numerous operative tech­niques that contribute to staple line disruption and leak after SG, the ability to perform an intraoperative assessment is of high value to surgeons. ICG is a water-soluble anionic probe, with excitation and emission wavelengths of around 778nm and 830nm, respec­tively. When administered intravenously, the molecule binds to plasma lipoproteins. ICG is then metabolized by the liver and excreted into the bile. Tests incorporating ICG have elevated sen­sitivity, as extremely small concentrations of ICG are visible. In addition, ICG uniquely offers extraordinary contrast versus other imaging modalities. The target is illuminated, while the back-
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025