Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 715 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
16 Мб
Скачать
208
https://t.me/medicina_free
Hagen etal. exclusively evaluated the use of intraluminal ICG to perform a leak test after robotic-assisted RYGB [31]. In this study, patients underwent a series of GJ anastomotic leak tests. Patients rst underwent an air insufation test, followed by a methylene blue leak test, and then an ICG leak test. No leaks were detected using air insufation or methylene blue; however, there were four positive ICG leak tests. The leak was repaired intraop­eratively and without complications. The authors concluded the intraluminal ICG was a more sensitive leak test than air insufa­tion or colored dye [31]. Utilization of intraluminal ICG as a leak test after RYGB appears promising and warrants further investi­gation.
E. B. Chen et al.
ICG Angiography inRYGB
Currently, there are no published reports on the use of ICG for assessment of tissue perfusion during RYGB.ICG angiography may be benecial to surgeons when tissue perfusion is a concern. Future research is necessary to understand the benets of ICG angiography as it applies to RYGB.
Biliopancreatic Diversion withDuodenal Switch (BPD/DS)
The BPD/DS was rst described by Hess and Hess in 1988 [48]. Of all the primary bariatric operations, the BPD/DS results in the greatest amount of weight loss from 65%EWL to 80%EWL [49,
50]. The BPD/DS is of particular benet to patients with super
obesity (BMI greater than and equal to 50kg/m2). In a randomized trial comparing patients with a BMI of 50kg/m2 to 60kg/m2, the mean reduction in BMI after a BPD/DS was 22.1kg/m2 compared to RYGB with a loss of 13.6kg/m2 at 5years (p<0.001) [49].
The BPD/DS offers the substantial improvements in metabolic prole of patients compared to other bariatric procedures. Specically, the BPD/DS leads to superior and steady glycemic control when directly compared to RYGB.Patients with a BMI of 35kg/m2 and higher were randomized to conventional medication therapy or undergo RYGB or biliopancreatic diversion (BPD)
7 Use ofFluorescence Guidance inBariatric Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
209
[51]. Of note, the authors compared patients undergoing a BPD as described by Scopinaro et al., which includes a distal gastrec­tomy, 200cm alimentary limb, 50cm common channel, and the small bowel anastomosed to the transected stomach [52]. The pri­mary end point was remission of diabetes, dened as a fasting glucose of less than 100mg/dL and a hemoglobin A1c of less than
6.5% in the absence of pharmacologic therapy. After 2years of follow-up, 95% of patients who received a BPD achieved remis­sion of diabetes, compared to 75% in the RYGB group, and 0% in the conventional medical therapy group (p<0.001) [51]. The dis­tal delivery of food instigates a complex interaction of incretins, bile acids, and the microbiome that contribute to the remarkable metabolic impact of the BPD/DS compared to other bariatric sur­geries [5355].
Despite the advantages of BPD/DS, the operation accounts for roughly 1% of total bariatric procedures performed every year [2]. This is likely due to the combination of technical challenges, the lack of a unique current procedural technology code for the lapa­roscopic BPD/DS, and intense metabolic impact that requires appropriate patient selection. Of note, the single anastomosis duo­denoileostomy with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) and stomach­intestinal pyloric sparing (SIPS) have recently emerged as modications of the BPD/DS.These procedures are a simplica­tion of the BPD/DS, as they do not include the Roux-en-Y ileoileal anastomosis. Instead, the SADIS/SIPS has a loop conguration at the duodenoileostomy with an associated longer common chan­nel, typically 250cm to 300cm [56]. Recent studies show compa­rable weight loss and similar nutritional proles when the SADIS/ SIPS is compared to RYGB or BPD/DS [5759]. The ASMBS now formally recognizes the SADIS/SIPS as a modication of the BPD/DS, and the SADIS/SIPS is “endorsed by the ASMBS as an appropriate metabolic bariatric surgical procedure” [60].
Technique ofBPD/DS
The BPD/DS is a technically challenging procedure that has been performed using the laparoscopic and robotic approach since 2000 [61, 62]. The BPD/DS consists of several procedures: SG, cholecystectomy, creation of an alimentary limb with duodenoil-
210
https://t.me/medicina_free
E. B. Chen et al.
eostomy, and construction of an ileoileostomy to connect the bil­iopancreatic limb and common channel. The rst step includes measuring the small bowel. Starting from the terminal ileum, the bowel is marked at the site of the ileoileostomy (100 cm to 150cm) and then again at the site of the future duodenoileostomy (200cm to 300cm). The next step is to perform the SG as previ­ously described. Some surgeons opt to create a larger gastric res­ervoir over a bigger calibration tube, for example, a 50 French bougie. After performing a cholecystectomy, the peri-duodenal dissection is begun 3cm to 5cm distal to the pylorus. The gastro­duodenal artery is identied, and a retro-duodenal tunnel is cre­ated above the artery. The duodenum is transected near the junction of the rst and second portions of the duodenum. The duodenoileostomy is fashioned between the proximal duodenal stump and the previously marked ileum. The duodenoileostomy can be created via a handsewn or stapled technique. Next, the ileum is transected proximal to the duodenoileostomy, and a leak test is performed. The ileoileostomy is created between the previ­ously marked distal ileum and the newly created biliopancreatic limb. Both unidirectional and bidirectional techniques have been described. The mesenteric defects at the ileoileostomy and trans­verse colon are closed with permanent suture. The results are a 100cm to 150cm alimentary limb and a 100cm to 150cm com­mon channel for a combined 200cm to 300cm total limb length and an extremely long biliopancreatic limb. To perform the SADIS/SIPS, a loop duodenoileostomy is constructed around 300cm from the terminal ileum.
Incidence andManagement ofLeaks After BPD/DS
BPD/DS leaks occur in the area of the gastric staple line, duode­noileal anastomosis, and ileoileal anastomosis. Leak rates at these sites are 1.5%, 1.5%, and 0.1%, respectively [63]. In a more recent study of 566 patients over 4 years, there was a 0.7% (n = 4 patients) leak rate at the duodenoileal anastomosis and a 0.2% (n=1 patient) leak rate from the gastric staple line [50]. Notably, when BPD/DS is compared to RYGB, there is a small increase in rate of leak [64].
7 Use ofFluorescence Guidance inBariatric Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
Ischemia of the duodenal stump, excessive tension on the anas­tomosis, and aggressive dissection are similarly a concern for leak after BPD/DS. With an extended medial mobilization of the greater curvature past the pylorus, the branches from the right gastroepiploic are cauterized. Care must be taken to preserve as much of the remaining blood supply of the duodenal stump as possible. Aside from the right gastroepiploic artery, the duodenal stump is also supplied by branches from the supraduodenal artery, the superior pancreaticoduodenal arteries, the gastroduodenal artery, and the right gastric artery. Cottam etal. described a safe method for dissecting and transecting the duodenum, with step­by- step description to protect the blood supply for the future duo­denoileal anastomosis [65].
Leaks after BPD/DS are managed using many of the same tools previously described. Gastric body leaks are treated in simi­lar manner to SG leak, with consideration for endoscopic stenting and injury to the duodenoileostomy. Leaks at the duodenoileal anastomosis can be especially difcult to control given associated high volume of output. Duodenal perforation or disruption of the anastomosis is similarly treated with placement of an omental patch and wide drainage. Endoscopic vacuum therapy is also a newer and promising method of treating duodenoileostomy leaks. Prognosis depends on the location of the leak as well as the patient’s clinical status and presentation [45, 66, 67].
211
Steps toUse ICG Angiography toTest Perfusion During BPD/DS
ICG can be incorporated into a BPS/DS in three methods. First, ICG angiography will conrm perfusion of the duodenal stump after transection. Second, intraluminal ICG is placed in an orogas­tric tube to assess the integrity and patency of the duodenoileal anastomosis. Finally, ICG cholangiogram will evaluate the biliary tree during a concomitant cholecystectomy. The three techniques are reviewed below.
ICG angiography is performed in a similar manner as previ­ously described in the SG section. ICG is reconstituted for intra­venous administration according to manufacturer instructions; a
212
https://t.me/medicina_free
25mg vial of ICG is reconstituted with 10mL of sterile water to create a 2.5 mg/mL solution. Three mL of the reconstituted
2.5mg/mL ICG solution (2.5mg of ICG) is then given intrave­nously after transection of the duodenum, followed by a 10mL saline ush. The transected duodenum is evaluated under near­infrared light to evaluate perfusion. A bright or dull uorescence hue is interrupted as sufcient perfusion to continue with the next steps in the BPD/DS procedure. The absence of uorescence is considered restricted perfusion. An extended time to reevaluate the perfusion or resection of the duodenum is performed based on surgeon judgment.
E. B. Chen et al.
Outcomes ofICG Angiography toDetermine Perfusion During BPD/DS
The BPD/DS is not a commonly performed procedure, and there are limited studies involving intraoperative ICG use during BPD/ DS or SADIS/SIPS.Currently, only one abstract mentions the use of ICG during a BPD/DS [27]. This study includes a combination of the procedures already mentioned: SG, RYGB, and BPD/ DS.Intravenous ICG was injected to assess perfusion of the tissue and anastomoses. Perfusion of the duodenum was evaluated in an unspecied number of BPD/DS procedures and deemed to be adequate, although decreased, in the transected duodenal stump. The authors do not mention any operative interventions as a result of the ICG angiography of the duodenal stump.
Pearls andPitfalls
There are a few pitfalls to consider when incorporating ICG angi­ography into the BPD/DS or SADIS/SIPS procedures. At times, due to the extended dissection, the duodenal stump may appear dusky and the ICG angiogram will show diminished perfusion. The options are to the resect this portion of the duodenum or cre­ate an anastomosis to the dusky tissue. Resection is complicated by the location of the pylorus and possibility of needing to convert to a gastroileal anastomosis or RYGB.In our experience, despite an ICG perfusion test with diminished blood ow, continuing with the duodenoileal anastomosis is a reasonable option. The duodenum has a concentrated submucosal vasculature that leads
7 Use ofFluorescence Guidance inBariatric Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
to adequate mucosal perfusion even when the serosa appears isch­emic. This allows for a viable duodenoileal anastomosis. The decision to resect or persist is often part of the learning curve of this procedure.
213
Steps toUse Intraluminal ICG foraLeak Test After BPD/DS
Although it is not reported, intraluminal ICG has been used to evaluate for a leak at the duodenoileostomy in our practice. Like previously mentioned, a solution is created with 12.5mg of ICG dissolved in 100mL of sterile 0.9% normal saline. The premixed solution is then instilled through the orogastric tube by the anes­thesiology team. The duodenoileal anastomosis is inspected with the near-infrared laser of the camera enabled. Patency of the anastomosis is conrmed when the ICG is observed shining through the wall of the duodenal bulb and across the anastomo­sis into the lumen of small bowel (Video 7.5). The anterior and posterior sides of the anastomosis are evaluated for intraperito­neal leakage of uorescence. The sharp contrast of ICG and the background tissue is especially obvious under the near-infrared light. A positive leak occurs when bright green uorescence is located outside of the lumen within the peritoneal cavity. The area of concern is oversewn, and a second leak test is performed. If the second leak test is positive, the surgeon must decide on another attempt at repair versus resecting and recreating the anastomosis.
Outcomes ofIntraluminal ICG toDetermine Leak After BPD/DS
The benets of using ICG as a leak test relate to the invisibility of ICG in white light. This allows the surgeon to toggle back and forth between near-infrared light and white light to isolate and repair a leak under direct visualization. If the leak test is negative, the next steps of the BPD/DS are performed while the SADI/SIPS procedure is complete. If a leak is positive, the tissue is repaired, and a second test is performed. The falciform ligament may be mobilized and wrapped around the anastomosis as a patch. External drainage is also an option after a positive leak test.
214
https://t.me/medicina_free
If there is a delay of contrast moving past the anastomosis and into the small bowel, additional time is warranted. For the BPD/ DS, the ileoileostomy is created and the mesenteric defect is closed. The duodenoileal anastomosis is reevaluated under near­infrared light. At this point, the intraluminal ICG should be pres­ent in the small bowel to conrm a patent anastomosis without intraperitoneal leakage of ICG.Given the paucity of data, bariat­ric surgery would benet from further research about the use of intraluminal ICG during BPD/DS and SADI/SIPS.
E. B. Chen et al.
Cholecystectomy Performed During BPD/DS
The inclusion of concomitant cholecystectomy during BPD/DS and SADI/SIPS is controversial. The rate of biliary symptoms after BPD/DS is higher than after RYGB or for other primary bar­iatric surgeries. This is attributed to the more drastic weight loss and aggressive malabsorption associated with a BPD/DS.Up to 23% of patients develop biliary symptoms if the gallbladder is not removed at the time of BPD/DS.This risk continues for the rst 3years after BPD/DS and peaks during the second year [68]. If laparoscopic cholecystectomy is performed after BPD/DS, the dissection of the gallbladder and cystic duct may be complicated by the proximity to the duodenal stump and duodenoileostomy. Another concern of chronic and intense inammation includes damage to the duodenal stump or DI anastomosis during chole­cystectomy. Furthermore, if choledocholithiasis occurs after BPD/DS or SADIS/SIPS, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopan­creatography requires surgical assistance via laparoscopic jejunal access. Another option at clearing the common bile duct is laparo­scopic or open common bile duct exploration. At last, the mesen­teric defects should be evaluated to ensure closure at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
ICG Cholangiogram
If prophylactic cholecystectomy is included in the BPD/DS, then ICG cholangiography can delineate the biliary system. ICG chol­angiography during a standalone cholecystectomy is discussed in a previous chapter. We will review the benets and challenges of ICG cholangiography as it relates to BPD/DS.
7 Use ofFluorescence Guidance inBariatric Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
215
Steps toUse ICG Cholangiogram During BPD/DS
The benets of ICG cholangiography compared to contrast chol­angiogram include cheaper cost, ease of use, a shorter learning curve, and lack of radiation exposure to patients and staff [69]. For ICG cholangiogram, 25mg of ICG is mixed with 10mL of sterile water. Then 3mL of the 2.5mg/mL solution (5mg ICG) is injected followed by 10 mL of sterile saline, approximately 45min before the ICG cholangiogram is performed. The ICG is metabolized by the liver and secreted into the bile. During the dis­section of the hepatocystic triangle, the near-infrared light will delineate biliary system, to allow differentiation between the cys­tic duct and the common bile duct. The ICG uorescence also can delineate the borders of the gallbladder and liver as the gallblad­der is dissected from the cystic plate. This technique is especially helpful when intrahepatic gallbladders, chronic inammation, or dense layers of pericholecystic adipose tissue are encountered. More detail about performing an isolated ICG cholangiogram is included in a previous chapter.
Pearls andPitfalls forICG Cholangiogram During BPD/DS
Using ICG cholangiography during BPD/DS is complicated for two reasons. First, care must be taken to prevent bile spillage dur­ing the cholecystectomy. If bile is spilled, irrigation should be limited to allow for the ICG leak test to be performed in the same area. Second, bile is often released during creation of the duode­noileostomy. Bile staining during any portion of the procedure will obscure and confuse further intraluminal leak tests. For these reasons, some surgeons do not use ICG for cholangiogram if there is interest in performing an intraluminal leak test with ICG.
Revisional Bariatric Surgery
The number of primary bariatric procedures continues to grow as does the number of revisional bariatric procedures [70]. Revisional bariatric surgery is associated with increased morbidity and mor­tality compared to primary bariatric surgery, with an overall com-
216
https://t.me/medicina_free
plication rate as high as 10% to 50% [71]. The rate of anastomotic leak is also signicantly higher in revisional cases [70, 71]. In a 13-year study at a tertiary care referral center, the incidence of anastomotic leak after revisional surgery was 13% [71].
Indications for revisional bariatric surgery include intolerable adverse effects, severe nutritional deciencies, and/or inadequate weight loss, [71]. The type of revisional procedure performed depends on the index operation and the indication for the revision. The range of revisional bariatric surgeries is extremely broad, but typical examples involve creation of a GJ.Three revisional proce­dures will be discussed along with the potential use for intraop­erative ICG.The more common revisional procedures that create a GJ are (1) removal of laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) with conversion to RYGB, (2) conversion of SG to RYGB, and (3) revision of GJ anastomosis in a RYGB.
E. B. Chen et al.
Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band (LAGB) toRYGB
The removal of LAGB and conversion to RYGB is a revisional bariatric surgery that is frequently performed. This revisional sur­gery is often due to intolerance of the adjustable gastric band with refractory GERD, esophageal dysmotility, or failure of weight loss. Long-term studies show that LAGB has a notable failure rate of 20% to 56%. Associated complications from LAGB include band slippage, band erosion, esophageal and pouch dilation, and gastric necrosis, in addition to failure to achieve adequate weight loss [72]. Removal of the LAGB and conversion to RYGB can be performed in a single operation or as a staged procedure. The LAGB and port are removed at the initial procedure, and if adhe­sions, bleeding, or manipulation of the stomach is excessive, then the RYGB is completed after a period of time. As a revisional procedure, the complication risk of a LAGB to RYGB is higher than that for a primary RYGB (8.6% vs. 5.5%, respectively) [73]. ICG may again help reduce the complication prole.
ICG may be of particular use during a removal of LAGB and conversion to RYGB as an intraluminal leak test. First, ICG will determine if there is any gastric leak after the removal of the band or after the takedown of the anterior fundoplication. This is espe-
7 Use ofFluorescence Guidance inBariatric Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
cially important if there was any concern for band erosion preop­eratively. If a gastric leak is seen, the leak can be repaired primarily with oversewing or with an omental patch. In this case, strong consideration should be given to performing the operation as a staged procedure and converting to a RYGB at a later point. Intraluminal ICG may be employed in the same manner previ­ously described during the conversion to a RYGB to assess the integrity of the GJ anastomosis.
217
Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) toRoux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB)
Conversion of SG to RYGB is another revisional bariatric surgery that creates a GJ and use of ICG may be benecial. Indications for conversion of SG include insufcient weight loss, stricture of the sleeve stomach, and/or refractory GERD [13]. Early revisions of SG to RYGB may be performed to correct perioperative compli­cations, including SG staple line leaks. SG revision to RYGB per­formed after a year or more is often due to medically refractory GERD, stula, or obstruction, including stenosis and helical twist of the stomach [13].
Complications after SG to RYGB include GJ anastomotic dehiscence, remnant staple line leaks, and surgical site infections (including organ space, deep, and supercial). Notably, in a single- institution study of SG to RYGB cases, the incidence of anastomotic leak at the GJ was 3.4% [13]. ICG may help reduce the complication rate during a conversion of SG to RYGB.For example, ICG is administered intravenously to help identify the blood supply of the sleeve stomach, particularly the left gastric artery. The left gastric artery is an important landmark to identify during the creation of a gastric pouch from a sleeve stomach, as it is the main blood supply to the future gastric pouch. Once identi­ed, the gastric pouch is created by cutting across the sleeve below the level of the left gastric artery. Indocyanine green can also be injected to highlight the biliary system and edge of the liver during revisional bariatric surgery (Video 7.6). In the situa­tion where the sleeve is dilated or a large redundant fundus is identied, the sleeve may require tailoring vertically to the angle of His to make an appropriate gastric pouch. This situation leaves
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025