Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 715 - файл
.pdf
208
https://t.me/medicina_free
Hagen etal. exclusively evaluated the use of intraluminal ICG
to perform a leak test after robotic-assisted RYGB [31]. In this
study, patients underwent a series of GJ anastomotic leak tests.
Patients rst underwent an air insufation test, followed by a
methylene blue leak test, and then an ICG leak test. No leaks were
detected using air insufation or methylene blue; however, there
were four positive ICG leak tests. The leak was repaired intraoperatively and without complications. The authors concluded the
intraluminal ICG was a more sensitive leak test than air insufation or colored dye [31]. Utilization of intraluminal ICG as a leak
test after RYGB appears promising and warrants further investigation.
E. B. Chen et al.
ICG Angiography inRYGB
Currently, there are no published reports on the use of ICG for
assessment of tissue perfusion during RYGB.ICG angiography
may be benecial to surgeons when tissue perfusion is a concern.
Future research is necessary to understand the benets of ICG
angiography as it applies to RYGB.
Biliopancreatic Diversion withDuodenal Switch
(BPD/DS)
The BPD/DS was rst described by Hess and Hess in 1988 [48].
Of all the primary bariatric operations, the BPD/DS results in the
greatest amount of weight loss from 65%EWL to 80%EWL [49,
50]. The BPD/DS is of particular benet to patients with super
obesity (BMI greater than and equal to 50kg/m2). In a randomized
trial comparing patients with a BMI of 50kg/m2 to 60kg/m2, the
mean reduction in BMI after a BPD/DS was 22.1kg/m2 compared
to RYGB with a loss of 13.6kg/m2 at 5years (p<0.001) [49].
The BPD/DS offers the substantial improvements in metabolic
prole of patients compared to other bariatric procedures.
Specically, the BPD/DS leads to superior and steady glycemic
control when directly compared to RYGB.Patients with a BMI of
35kg/m2 and higher were randomized to conventional medication
therapy or undergo RYGB or biliopancreatic diversion (BPD)

7 Use ofFluorescence Guidance inBariatric Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
209
[51]. Of note, the authors compared patients undergoing a BPD as
described by Scopinaro et al., which includes a distal gastrectomy, 200cm alimentary limb, 50cm common channel, and the
small bowel anastomosed to the transected stomach [52]. The primary end point was remission of diabetes, dened as a fasting
glucose of less than 100mg/dL and a hemoglobin A1c of less than
6.5% in the absence of pharmacologic therapy. After 2years of
follow-up, 95% of patients who received a BPD achieved remission of diabetes, compared to 75% in the RYGB group, and 0% in
the conventional medical therapy group (p<0.001) [51]. The distal delivery of food instigates a complex interaction of incretins,
bile acids, and the microbiome that contribute to the remarkable
metabolic impact of the BPD/DS compared to other bariatric surgeries [53–55].
Despite the advantages of BPD/DS, the operation accounts for
roughly 1% of total bariatric procedures performed every year [2].
This is likely due to the combination of technical challenges, the
lack of a unique current procedural technology code for the laparoscopic BPD/DS, and intense metabolic impact that requires
appropriate patient selection. Of note, the single anastomosis duodenoileostomy with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) and stomachintestinal pyloric sparing (SIPS) have recently emerged as
modications of the BPD/DS.These procedures are a simplication of the BPD/DS, as they do not include the Roux-en-Y ileoileal
anastomosis. Instead, the SADIS/SIPS has a loop conguration at
the duodenoileostomy with an associated longer common channel, typically 250cm to 300cm [56]. Recent studies show comparable weight loss and similar nutritional proles when the SADIS/
SIPS is compared to RYGB or BPD/DS [57–59]. The ASMBS
now formally recognizes the SADIS/SIPS as a modication of the
BPD/DS, and the SADIS/SIPS is “endorsed by the ASMBS as an
appropriate metabolic bariatric surgical procedure” [60].
Technique ofBPD/DS
The BPD/DS is a technically challenging procedure that has been
performed using the laparoscopic and robotic approach since
2000 [61, 62]. The BPD/DS consists of several procedures: SG,
cholecystectomy, creation of an alimentary limb with duodenoil-

210
https://t.me/medicina_free
E. B. Chen et al.
eostomy, and construction of an ileoileostomy to connect the biliopancreatic limb and common channel. The rst step includes
measuring the small bowel. Starting from the terminal ileum, the
bowel is marked at the site of the ileoileostomy (100 cm to
150cm) and then again at the site of the future duodenoileostomy
(200cm to 300cm). The next step is to perform the SG as previously described. Some surgeons opt to create a larger gastric reservoir over a bigger calibration tube, for example, a 50 French
bougie. After performing a cholecystectomy, the peri-duodenal
dissection is begun 3cm to 5cm distal to the pylorus. The gastroduodenal artery is identied, and a retro-duodenal tunnel is created above the artery. The duodenum is transected near the
junction of the rst and second portions of the duodenum. The
duodenoileostomy is fashioned between the proximal duodenal
stump and the previously marked ileum. The duodenoileostomy
can be created via a handsewn or stapled technique. Next, the
ileum is transected proximal to the duodenoileostomy, and a leak
test is performed. The ileoileostomy is created between the previously marked distal ileum and the newly created biliopancreatic
limb. Both unidirectional and bidirectional techniques have been
described. The mesenteric defects at the ileoileostomy and transverse colon are closed with permanent suture. The results are a
100cm to 150cm alimentary limb and a 100cm to 150cm common channel for a combined 200cm to 300cm total limb length
and an extremely long biliopancreatic limb. To perform the
SADIS/SIPS, a loop duodenoileostomy is constructed around
300cm from the terminal ileum.
Incidence andManagement ofLeaks After BPD/DS
BPD/DS leaks occur in the area of the gastric staple line, duodenoileal anastomosis, and ileoileal anastomosis. Leak rates at these
sites are 1.5%, 1.5%, and 0.1%, respectively [63]. In a more recent
study of 566 patients over 4 years, there was a 0.7% (n = 4
patients) leak rate at the duodenoileal anastomosis and a 0.2%
(n=1 patient) leak rate from the gastric staple line [50]. Notably,
when BPD/DS is compared to RYGB, there is a small increase in
rate of leak [64].

7 Use ofFluorescence Guidance inBariatric Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
Ischemia of the duodenal stump, excessive tension on the anastomosis, and aggressive dissection are similarly a concern for leak
after BPD/DS. With an extended medial mobilization of the
greater curvature past the pylorus, the branches from the right
gastroepiploic are cauterized. Care must be taken to preserve as
much of the remaining blood supply of the duodenal stump as
possible. Aside from the right gastroepiploic artery, the duodenal
stump is also supplied by branches from the supraduodenal artery,
the superior pancreaticoduodenal arteries, the gastroduodenal
artery, and the right gastric artery. Cottam etal. described a safe
method for dissecting and transecting the duodenum, with stepby- step description to protect the blood supply for the future duodenoileal anastomosis [65].
Leaks after BPD/DS are managed using many of the same
tools previously described. Gastric body leaks are treated in similar manner to SG leak, with consideration for endoscopic stenting
and injury to the duodenoileostomy. Leaks at the duodenoileal
anastomosis can be especially difcult to control given associated
high volume of output. Duodenal perforation or disruption of the
anastomosis is similarly treated with placement of an omental
patch and wide drainage. Endoscopic vacuum therapy is also a
newer and promising method of treating duodenoileostomy leaks.
Prognosis depends on the location of the leak as well as the
patient’s clinical status and presentation [45, 66, 67].
211
Steps toUse ICG Angiography toTest Perfusion
During BPD/DS
ICG can be incorporated into a BPS/DS in three methods. First,
ICG angiography will conrm perfusion of the duodenal stump
after transection. Second, intraluminal ICG is placed in an orogastric tube to assess the integrity and patency of the duodenoileal
anastomosis. Finally, ICG cholangiogram will evaluate the biliary
tree during a concomitant cholecystectomy. The three techniques
are reviewed below.
ICG angiography is performed in a similar manner as previously described in the SG section. ICG is reconstituted for intravenous administration according to manufacturer instructions; a

212
https://t.me/medicina_free
25mg vial of ICG is reconstituted with 10mL of sterile water to
create a 2.5 mg/mL solution. Three mL of the reconstituted
2.5mg/mL ICG solution (2.5mg of ICG) is then given intravenously after transection of the duodenum, followed by a 10mL
saline ush. The transected duodenum is evaluated under nearinfrared light to evaluate perfusion. A bright or dull uorescence
hue is interrupted as sufcient perfusion to continue with the next
steps in the BPD/DS procedure. The absence of uorescence is
considered restricted perfusion. An extended time to reevaluate
the perfusion or resection of the duodenum is performed based on
surgeon judgment.
E. B. Chen et al.
Outcomes ofICG Angiography toDetermine
Perfusion During BPD/DS
The BPD/DS is not a commonly performed procedure, and there
are limited studies involving intraoperative ICG use during BPD/
DS or SADIS/SIPS.Currently, only one abstract mentions the use
of ICG during a BPD/DS [27]. This study includes a combination
of the procedures already mentioned: SG, RYGB, and BPD/
DS.Intravenous ICG was injected to assess perfusion of the tissue
and anastomoses. Perfusion of the duodenum was evaluated in an
unspecied number of BPD/DS procedures and deemed to be
adequate, although decreased, in the transected duodenal stump.
The authors do not mention any operative interventions as a result
of the ICG angiography of the duodenal stump.
Pearls andPitfalls
There are a few pitfalls to consider when incorporating ICG angiography into the BPD/DS or SADIS/SIPS procedures. At times,
due to the extended dissection, the duodenal stump may appear
dusky and the ICG angiogram will show diminished perfusion.
The options are to the resect this portion of the duodenum or create an anastomosis to the dusky tissue. Resection is complicated
by the location of the pylorus and possibility of needing to convert
to a gastroileal anastomosis or RYGB.In our experience, despite
an ICG perfusion test with diminished blood ow, continuing
with the duodenoileal anastomosis is a reasonable option. The
duodenum has a concentrated submucosal vasculature that leads

7 Use ofFluorescence Guidance inBariatric Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
to adequate mucosal perfusion even when the serosa appears ischemic. This allows for a viable duodenoileal anastomosis. The
decision to resect or persist is often part of the learning curve of
this procedure.
213
Steps toUse Intraluminal ICG foraLeak Test After
BPD/DS
Although it is not reported, intraluminal ICG has been used to
evaluate for a leak at the duodenoileostomy in our practice. Like
previously mentioned, a solution is created with 12.5mg of ICG
dissolved in 100mL of sterile 0.9% normal saline. The premixed
solution is then instilled through the orogastric tube by the anesthesiology team. The duodenoileal anastomosis is inspected
with the near-infrared laser of the camera enabled. Patency of
the anastomosis is conrmed when the ICG is observed shining
through the wall of the duodenal bulb and across the anastomosis into the lumen of small bowel (Video 7.5). The anterior and
posterior sides of the anastomosis are evaluated for intraperitoneal leakage of uorescence. The sharp contrast of ICG and the
background tissue is especially obvious under the near-infrared
light. A positive leak occurs when bright green uorescence is
located outside of the lumen within the peritoneal cavity. The
area of concern is oversewn, and a second leak test is performed.
If the second leak test is positive, the surgeon must decide on
another attempt at repair versus resecting and recreating the
anastomosis.
Outcomes ofIntraluminal ICG toDetermine Leak
After BPD/DS
The benets of using ICG as a leak test relate to the invisibility of
ICG in white light. This allows the surgeon to toggle back and
forth between near-infrared light and white light to isolate and
repair a leak under direct visualization. If the leak test is negative,
the next steps of the BPD/DS are performed while the SADI/SIPS
procedure is complete. If a leak is positive, the tissue is repaired,
and a second test is performed. The falciform ligament may be
mobilized and wrapped around the anastomosis as a patch.
External drainage is also an option after a positive leak test.

214
https://t.me/medicina_free
If there is a delay of contrast moving past the anastomosis and
into the small bowel, additional time is warranted. For the BPD/
DS, the ileoileostomy is created and the mesenteric defect is
closed. The duodenoileal anastomosis is reevaluated under nearinfrared light. At this point, the intraluminal ICG should be present in the small bowel to conrm a patent anastomosis without
intraperitoneal leakage of ICG.Given the paucity of data, bariatric surgery would benet from further research about the use of
intraluminal ICG during BPD/DS and SADI/SIPS.
E. B. Chen et al.
Cholecystectomy Performed During BPD/DS
The inclusion of concomitant cholecystectomy during BPD/DS
and SADI/SIPS is controversial. The rate of biliary symptoms
after BPD/DS is higher than after RYGB or for other primary bariatric surgeries. This is attributed to the more drastic weight loss
and aggressive malabsorption associated with a BPD/DS.Up to
23% of patients develop biliary symptoms if the gallbladder is not
removed at the time of BPD/DS.This risk continues for the rst
3years after BPD/DS and peaks during the second year [68]. If
laparoscopic cholecystectomy is performed after BPD/DS, the
dissection of the gallbladder and cystic duct may be complicated
by the proximity to the duodenal stump and duodenoileostomy.
Another concern of chronic and intense inammation includes
damage to the duodenal stump or DI anastomosis during cholecystectomy. Furthermore, if choledocholithiasis occurs after
BPD/DS or SADIS/SIPS, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography requires surgical assistance via laparoscopic jejunal
access. Another option at clearing the common bile duct is laparoscopic or open common bile duct exploration. At last, the mesenteric defects should be evaluated to ensure closure at the time of
laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
ICG Cholangiogram
If prophylactic cholecystectomy is included in the BPD/DS, then
ICG cholangiography can delineate the biliary system. ICG cholangiography during a standalone cholecystectomy is discussed in
a previous chapter. We will review the benets and challenges of
ICG cholangiography as it relates to BPD/DS.

7 Use ofFluorescence Guidance inBariatric Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
215
Steps toUse ICG Cholangiogram During BPD/DS
The benets of ICG cholangiography compared to contrast cholangiogram include cheaper cost, ease of use, a shorter learning
curve, and lack of radiation exposure to patients and staff [69].
For ICG cholangiogram, 25mg of ICG is mixed with 10mL of
sterile water. Then 3mL of the 2.5mg/mL solution (5mg ICG) is
injected followed by 10 mL of sterile saline, approximately
45min before the ICG cholangiogram is performed. The ICG is
metabolized by the liver and secreted into the bile. During the dissection of the hepatocystic triangle, the near-infrared light will
delineate biliary system, to allow differentiation between the cystic duct and the common bile duct. The ICG uorescence also can
delineate the borders of the gallbladder and liver as the gallbladder is dissected from the cystic plate. This technique is especially
helpful when intrahepatic gallbladders, chronic inammation, or
dense layers of pericholecystic adipose tissue are encountered.
More detail about performing an isolated ICG cholangiogram is
included in a previous chapter.
Pearls andPitfalls forICG Cholangiogram
During BPD/DS
Using ICG cholangiography during BPD/DS is complicated for
two reasons. First, care must be taken to prevent bile spillage during the cholecystectomy. If bile is spilled, irrigation should be
limited to allow for the ICG leak test to be performed in the same
area. Second, bile is often released during creation of the duodenoileostomy. Bile staining during any portion of the procedure
will obscure and confuse further intraluminal leak tests. For these
reasons, some surgeons do not use ICG for cholangiogram if there
is interest in performing an intraluminal leak test with ICG.
Revisional Bariatric Surgery
The number of primary bariatric procedures continues to grow as
does the number of revisional bariatric procedures [70]. Revisional
bariatric surgery is associated with increased morbidity and mortality compared to primary bariatric surgery, with an overall com-

216
https://t.me/medicina_free
plication rate as high as 10% to 50% [71]. The rate of anastomotic
leak is also signicantly higher in revisional cases [70, 71]. In a
13-year study at a tertiary care referral center, the incidence of
anastomotic leak after revisional surgery was 13% [71].
Indications for revisional bariatric surgery include intolerable
adverse effects, severe nutritional deciencies, and/or inadequate
weight loss, [71]. The type of revisional procedure performed
depends on the index operation and the indication for the revision.
The range of revisional bariatric surgeries is extremely broad, but
typical examples involve creation of a GJ.Three revisional procedures will be discussed along with the potential use for intraoperative ICG.The more common revisional procedures that create
a GJ are (1) removal of laparoscopic adjustable gastric band
(LAGB) with conversion to RYGB, (2) conversion of SG to
RYGB, and (3) revision of GJ anastomosis in a RYGB.
E. B. Chen et al.
Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band (LAGB)
toRYGB
The removal of LAGB and conversion to RYGB is a revisional
bariatric surgery that is frequently performed. This revisional surgery is often due to intolerance of the adjustable gastric band with
refractory GERD, esophageal dysmotility, or failure of weight
loss. Long-term studies show that LAGB has a notable failure rate
of 20% to 56%. Associated complications from LAGB include
band slippage, band erosion, esophageal and pouch dilation, and
gastric necrosis, in addition to failure to achieve adequate weight
loss [72]. Removal of the LAGB and conversion to RYGB can be
performed in a single operation or as a staged procedure. The
LAGB and port are removed at the initial procedure, and if adhesions, bleeding, or manipulation of the stomach is excessive, then
the RYGB is completed after a period of time. As a revisional
procedure, the complication risk of a LAGB to RYGB is higher
than that for a primary RYGB (8.6% vs. 5.5%, respectively) [73].
ICG may again help reduce the complication prole.
ICG may be of particular use during a removal of LAGB and
conversion to RYGB as an intraluminal leak test. First, ICG will
determine if there is any gastric leak after the removal of the band
or after the takedown of the anterior fundoplication. This is espe-

7 Use ofFluorescence Guidance inBariatric Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
cially important if there was any concern for band erosion preoperatively. If a gastric leak is seen, the leak can be repaired
primarily with oversewing or with an omental patch. In this case,
strong consideration should be given to performing the operation
as a staged procedure and converting to a RYGB at a later point.
Intraluminal ICG may be employed in the same manner previously described during the conversion to a RYGB to assess the
integrity of the GJ anastomosis.
217
Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) toRoux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
(RYGB)
Conversion of SG to RYGB is another revisional bariatric surgery
that creates a GJ and use of ICG may be benecial. Indications for
conversion of SG include insufcient weight loss, stricture of the
sleeve stomach, and/or refractory GERD [13]. Early revisions of
SG to RYGB may be performed to correct perioperative complications, including SG staple line leaks. SG revision to RYGB performed after a year or more is often due to medically refractory
GERD, stula, or obstruction, including stenosis and helical twist
of the stomach [13].
Complications after SG to RYGB include GJ anastomotic
dehiscence, remnant staple line leaks, and surgical site infections
(including organ space, deep, and supercial). Notably, in a
single- institution study of SG to RYGB cases, the incidence of
anastomotic leak at the GJ was 3.4% [13]. ICG may help reduce
the complication rate during a conversion of SG to RYGB.For
example, ICG is administered intravenously to help identify the
blood supply of the sleeve stomach, particularly the left gastric
artery. The left gastric artery is an important landmark to identify
during the creation of a gastric pouch from a sleeve stomach, as it
is the main blood supply to the future gastric pouch. Once identied, the gastric pouch is created by cutting across the sleeve
below the level of the left gastric artery. Indocyanine green can
also be injected to highlight the biliary system and edge of the
liver during revisional bariatric surgery (Video 7.6). In the situation where the sleeve is dilated or a large redundant fundus is
identied, the sleeve may require tailoring vertically to the angle
of His to make an appropriate gastric pouch. This situation leaves
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025
