- •Table of Contents
- •Case Studies
- •Volume 2 Stephen m. Stahl
- •Thomas l. Schwartz
- •It furthers the University’s mission by disseminating knowledge in the pursuit of education, learning and research at the highest international levels of excellence.
- •Information on this title: www.Cambridge.Org/9781107607330
- •Illness – Chemotherapy – Examinations, questions, etc. |
- •Isbn 978-1-107-60733-0 Paperback
- •Introduction
- •Learning objectives
- •Accreditation and credit designation statements
- •Optional posttest and cme credit instructions (see p. 441) Peer review
- •Disclosures
- •Authors/developers
- •Disclosure of off-label use
- •Disclaimer
- •Cultural and linguistic competency
- •Provider
- •Support
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Psychotherapy history
- •Patient evaluation on initial visit
- •Current medications
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation (continued)
- •Further investigation
- •Case outcome: first interim follow-up visit four weeks later
- •Question
- •Case outcome: second interim follow-up visit at two months
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim follow-up visit at three months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: second interim follow-up visit at three months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through six months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim follow-up visits through 12 months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through 24 months
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Performance in practice: confessions of a psychopharmacologist
- •Tips and pearls
- •Psychotherapy moment
- •Psychopharmacology components
- •Psychotherapy
- •Documentation
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation
- •Further investigation
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation (continued)
- •Case outcome: interim follow-ups through six months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: nine months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-ups through nine months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: nine-month follow-ups
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim follow-up through nine months (continued)
- •Case outcome and multiple interim follow-ups to 24 months
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Performance in practice: confessions of a psychopharmacologist
- •Tips and pearls
- •Tardive dyskinesia
- •Tardive dyskinesia facts
- •Tardive dyskinesia treatments
- •Pretest self-assessment question (answer at the end of the case)
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation
- •Further investigation
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation (continued)
- •Case outcome: interim follow-ups through four months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: nine months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-ups through nine months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: 9–12 month follow-ups
- •Question
- •Case outcome: interim follow-ups through 12 months
- •Case outcome: multiple interim follow-ups through 16 months
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: 16-month follow-ups
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Performance in practice: confessions of a psychopharmacologist
- •Tips and pearls
- •Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (aims)
- •Aims instructions
- •Case outcome: use of outcome measures
- •Posttest self-assessment question and answer
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation (continued)
- •Further investigation
- •Question
- •Case outcome: interim follow-ups through three months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: four months
- •Question
- •Case outcome: interim follow-ups through six months
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim follow-up, nine months (continued)
- •Case outcome and multiple interim follow-ups to 12–120 months
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Performance in practice: confessions of a psychopharmacologist
- •Tips and pearls
- •Mechanism of action moment How does vns theoretically work?
- •Vns side effects
- •Neurostimulation and neuromodulatory devices other than vns
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation
- •Further investigation
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation (continued)
- •Case outcome: interim follow-ups through one month
- •Question
- •Case outcome: interim follow-ups through two months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-ups through three months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: four-month follow-ups
- •Question
- •Case outcome: interim follow-ups through four months (continued)
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim follow-ups through four months
- •Case outcome and multiple interim follow-ups to six months
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Performance in practice: confessions of a psychopharmacologist
- •Tips and pearls
- •Is quetiapine (Seroquel) an antipsychotic, anti-manic, antidepressant, anxiolytic, or a hypnotic?
- •Pharmacodynamics of quetiapine and norquetiapine
- •Pretest self-assessment question (answer at the end of the case)
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation
- •Further investigation
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation (continued)
- •Case outcome: interim follow-ups through one month
- •Case outcome: interim follow-ups through two months
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: two months
- •Question
- •Case outcome: interim follow-ups through two months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-ups through three months
- •Question
- •Case outcome and multiple interim follow-ups up to six months
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Performance in practice: confessions of a psychopharmacologist
- •Pharmacodynamic moment
- •What is worse in causing escalated mania or mixed features, antidepressants or stimulants?
- •Should unipolar antidepressants be used in bipolar disorder?
- •Does clonazepam (Klonopin) work in bipolar mania?
- •Posttest self-assessment question and answer
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Question
- •Case outcome
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Tips and pearls
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation
- •Further investigation
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation (continued)
- •Case outcome: interim follow-ups through three months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: four months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-ups through six months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-ups through nine months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: nine-month follow-ups
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim follow-up, nine months (continued)
- •Case outcome and multiple interim follow-ups to 24 months
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Performance in practice: confessions of a psychopharmacologist
- •Tips and pearls
- •Treating aawg with metformin
- •Posttest self-assessment question and answer
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation
- •Further investigation
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation (continued)
- •Case outcome: interim follow-ups through six months
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: six months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-ups through nine months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-ups through 18 months
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: through 20 months
- •Question
- •Case outcome: interim follow-ups through 24 months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: 24-month follow-ups
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up, 36 months
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: 48-month follow-ups
- •Question
- •Case outcome and multiple interim follow-ups to 48 months
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Performance in practice: confessions of a psychopharmacologist
- •Tips and pearls
- •Techniques for switching antipsychotics
- •Pretest self-assessment question (answer at the end of the case)
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Question
- •Case outcome
- •Case debrief
- •Clozapine sialorrhea statistics and etiology
- •Possible antidotes for cis
- •Posttest self-assessment question and answer
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Further investigation
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation (continued)
- •Case outcome: interim follow-ups through three months
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: six months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-ups through nine months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-ups through 12 months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-ups through 12 months (continued)
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: 12 month follow-ups
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up, 24 months
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: 36-month follow-ups
- •Case outcome and multiple interim follow-ups to 60 months
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Performance in practice: confessions of a psychopharmacologist
- •Tips and pearls
- •A pharmacodynamic moment
- •Antihistamine and the sleep–wake switch
- •Serotonin receptor antagonism and sleep
- •What about 5-ht1d receptor antagonism?
- •What about 5-ht7 receptor antagonism?
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Current medications
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation (continued)
- •Further investigation
- •Case outcome: first interim follow-up visit four weeks later
- •Question
- •Case outcome: second interim follow-up visit at two months
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: second interim follow-up visit at two months
- •Question
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through seven months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim follow-up visits through seven months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through 24 months
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Performance in practice: confessions of a psychopharmacologist
- •Tips and pearls
- •Mechanism of action moment
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Psychotherapy history
- •Patient evaluation on initial visit
- •Current medications
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation (continued)
- •Further investigation
- •Case outcome: first interim follow-up visit eight weeks later
- •Question
- •Case outcome: second and third interim follow-up visits at three months
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: second interim follow-up visit at three months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: second interim follow-up visit at three months (continued)
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through five months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim follow-up visits through nine months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through 12 months
- •Attending physician mental notes
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through 15 months
- •Question
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Performance in practice: confessions of a psychopharmacologist
- •Tips and pearls
- •Pharmacoeconomic and regulatory moment
- •How many ways can a drug be turned into a slow-release preparation?
- •Pretest self-assessment question (answer at the end of the case)
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Medication history
- •Psychotherapy history
- •Social and personal history
- •Medical history
- •Family history
- •Patient evaluation on initial visit
- •Current medications
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation (continued)
- •Further investigation
- •Case outcome: first interim follow-up visit four to six weeks later
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim follow-up visits through three months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through three months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim follow-up visits through three months (continued)
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through six months
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim follow-up visits through six months
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Performance in practice: confessions of a psychopharmacologist
- •Tips and pearls
- •Overview
- •Classification
- •Clinical manifestations
- •Therapy and management
- •Posttest self-assessment question and answer
- •Pretest self-assessment question (answer at the end of the case)
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Current medications
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation (continued)
- •Further investigation
- •Case outcome: first interim follow-up visit six weeks later
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim follow-up visits through six months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through six months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim follow-up visit through six months (continued)
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through nine months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim follow-up visits through nine months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through 15 months
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Performance in practice: confessions of a psychopharmacologist
- •Tips and pearls
- •Neurocircuitry moment
- •Treatments for ocd
- •Posttest-self assessment question and answer
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Social and personal history
- •Patient evaluation on initial visit
- •Current medications
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation (continued)
- •Further investigation
- •Case outcome: first interim follow-up visit four weeks later
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: second interim follow-up visit at two months
- •Case outcome: second interim follow-up visit at two months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: second interim follow-up visit at two months (continued)
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through four months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim follow-up visits through four months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through nine months
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim follow-up visits through 12 months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through 18 months
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Performance in practice: confessions of a psychopharmacologist
- •Tips and pearls
- •Mechanism of action moment
- •Diagnosis
- •Etiology
- •Rls and comorbidity
- •Rls treatment
- •Posttest self-assessment question and answer
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Current medications
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation (continued)
- •Further investigation
- •Case outcome: first interim follow-up visit four weeks later
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: second interim follow-up visit at two months
- •Case outcome: second interim follow-up visit at two months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: second interim follow-up visit at two months (continued)
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits at three months
- •Question
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visit at four months
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim follow-up visits through four months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through six months
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Performance in practice: confessions of a psychopharmacologist
- •Tips and pearls
- •Pharmacokinetic moment
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Psychotherapy history
- •Patient evaluation on initial visit
- •Current medications
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation (continued)
- •Further investigation
- •Case outcome: first interim follow-up visit four weeks later
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: second interim follow-up visit at three months
- •Case outcome: second interim follow-up visit at three months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: second interim follow-up visit at three months (continued)
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through 12 months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim follow-up visits through 24 months
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Performance in practice: confessions of a psychopharmacologist
- •Tips and pearls
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Current medications
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation (continued)
- •Further investigation
- •Case outcome: first interim follow-up visit three months later
- •Question
- •Case outcome: first interim follow-up visit three months later (continued)
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: second interim follow-up visit at six months
- •Case outcome: second interim follow-up visit at six months
- •Question
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through nine months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim follow-up visits through nine months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through 36 months
- •Question
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through 48 months
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Performance in practice: confessions of a psychopharmacologist
- •Tips and pearls
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Patient evaluation on initial visit
- •Current medications
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation (continued)
- •Further investigation
- •Case outcome: first interim follow-up visits four and eight weeks later
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: second interim follow-up visit at three months
- •Case outcome: second interim follow-up visit at three months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: second interim follow-up visit at three months (continued)
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through six months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim follow-up visits through six months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through nine months
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim follow-up visits through nine months
- •Question
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through 15 months
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Performance in practice: confessions of a psychopharmacologist
- •Tips and pearls
- •Neuropsychiatric moment
- •Causes, incidence, and risk factors
- •Symptoms
- •Signs and tests
- •Treatment
- •Prognosis
- •Pharmacodynamic moment
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Psychotherapy history
- •Patient evaluation on initial visit
- •Current medications
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation (continued)
- •Further investigation
- •Case outcome: first interim follow-up visit four weeks later
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: second interim follow-up visit at two months
- •Case outcome: second interim follow-up visit at two months
- •Question
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through five years
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim follow-up visits through five years
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through six years
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim visits through year six
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through six years (continued)
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim visits through year six (continued)
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Performance in practice: confessions of a psychopharmacologist
- •Tips and pearls
- •Mechanism of action moment
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Psychotherapy history
- •Patient evaluation on initial visit
- •Current medications
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation (continued)
- •Further investigation
- •Case outcome: first interim follow-up visits one to two weeks later
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: second interim follow-up visit at three to four weeks
- •Case outcome: second interim follow-up visit at three to four weeks
- •Question
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through four to six weeks later
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim follow-up visits through six weeks
- •Case outcome interim follow-up visits through 10 weeks
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Performance in practice: confessions of a psychopharmacologist
- •Tips and pearls
- •Chronic risks
- •Acute risks predictive of future suicide attempt include*
- •Summary
- •Posttest self-assessment question and answer
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Psychotherapy history
- •Patient evaluation on initial visit
- •Further investigation
- •Case outcome: first interim follow-up visits through six months
- •Question
- •Case outcome: second interim follow-up visits through 12 months
- •Question
- •Case outcome: second interim follow-up visits through 12 months (continued)
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim visits through 18 months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through 18 months
- •Question
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through 24 months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim follow-up visits through 24 months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through 24 months (continued)
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Performance in practice: confessions of a psychopharmacologist
- •Tips and pearls
- •Gaba-a receptors and the positive allosteric modulation of the bZs
- •Gaba-a receptors: desensitization, tachyphylaxis, and tolerance
- •Why does this happen?
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation (continued)
- •Further investigation
- •Case outcome: first interim follow-up visits through three months
- •Question
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through four months
- •Question
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through six months
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: visits through six months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through nine months
- •Question
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through nine months (continued)
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Performance in practice: confessions of a psychopharmacologist
- •Tips and pearls
- •Pretest self-assessment question (answer at the end of the case)
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Case outcome: via telephone
- •Further investigation
- •Case outcome: first interim follow-up six hours later
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: six hours later
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim follow-up information through 72 hours
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up information through 72 hours
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits through 80 hours
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: interim follow-up information through 72 hours (continued)
- •Question
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up information through 92 hours
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Performance in practice: confessions of a psychopharmacologist
- •Tips and pearls
- •Delirium primer
- •Posttest self-assessment question and answer
- •Pretest self-assessment question (answer at the end of the case)
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Psychotherapy history
- •Patient evaluation on initial visit
- •Current psychiatric medications
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation (continued)
- •Case outcome: initial visit
- •Further investigation
- •Question
- •Case outcome: first interim follow-up visit one week later
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Performance in practice: confessions of a psychopharmacologist
- •Tips and pearls
- •Mechanism of action moment
- •Disulfiram (Antabuse)
- •Naltrexone (ReVia)
- •Acamprosate (Campral)
- •Posttest self-assessment question and answer
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Social and personal history
- •Medical history
- •Family history
- •Medication history
- •Psychotherapy history
- •Patient evaluation on initial visit
- •Current psychiatric medications
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation (continued)
- •Case outcome: initial visit
- •Further investigation
- •Case outcome: first interim follow-up visit two months later
- •Question
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits three to six months later
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: follow-up visit, six months
- •Case outcome: interim follow-up visits eight to 12 months later
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Performance in practice: confessions of a psychopharmacologist
- •Tips and pearls
- •Medication management of adhd in children versus adults
- •Posttest self-assessment question and answer
- •Patient evaluation on intake
- •Psychiatric history
- •Patient evaluation on initial visit
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation
- •Case outcome: initial visit
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation (continued)
- •Case outcome: interim visit at six weeks
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Patient’s genetic summary
- •Case outcome: initial visit
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation (continued)
- •Case outcome: interim visit at four weeks
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •A short tutorial on the scientific background of this case
- •Patient’s genetic summary
- •Case outcome: initial visit
- •Question
- •Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation (continued)
- •Case outcome: interim visit through 16 weeks
- •Case debrief
- •Take-home points
- •Cme online posttest and certificate instructions
- •Index of drug names
- •Index of case studies
Patient’s genetic summary
In Table 29.2, findings in red suggest genetic vulnerabilities
Black findings may be genetically protective
Genes (a person’s genotype) code for proteins, i.e., receptors, enzymes, growth factors, and regulatory factors
Proteins allow neurocircuits to be active at optimal performance levels
Neurocircuits that are over- or underactive likely lead to symptoms (a patient’s phenotype)
Sometimes these inappropriately hyper- or hypofunctioning neurocircuits can be seen with functional neuroimaging techniques such as fMRI or PET scans (called an endophenotype)
If a patient inherits enough of these subtle molecular vulnerabilities (gene mutations), then s/he will collect abnormal proteins, develop abnormally functioning neurocircuits, and show different psychiatric symptoms that may coalesce into a syndrome or categorical DSM-5 diagnosis
Table 29.2. Genetic vulnerabilities in another patient with MDD
Pathway |
Gene |
Comments |
Patient result |
||||
Serotonin |
SLC6A4 |
Carriers of the Short(S) or L(G) alleles may be less likely to respond to SSRIs, or may respond more slowly, and may be more likely to experience adverse effects from SSRIs |
S/S |
||||
Dopamine |
DRD2 |
Del allele carriers (Del/Ins or Del/Del) may demonstrate less satisfactory antipsychotic drug response compared to Ins/Ins individuals |
(Ins/Ins) |
||||
COMT |
Patients with the homozygous Val/Val genotype may be less likely to respond to SSRI treatments |
(158 Val/Val, 472 G/G) |
|||||
Glutamate |
CACNA1C |
The A allele has been associated with elevated rates of mood disorder recurrence |
(G/G) |
||||
Metabolism |
MTHFR |
Presence of the 677 T allele (C/T or T/T) is associated with decreased MTHFR activity, leading to increased homocysteine and decreased methylation capacity |
(T/C) |
||||
MTHFR–COMT methylation interaction |
Methylation pathways regulate the metabolism of neurotransmitters, particularly DA. In low methylation states, such as that caused by the MTHFR T allele, DA is degraded at a higher rate. This effect is exacerbated in patients who carry both the MTHFR 677 T allele and the high-activity COMT 158 Val/Val genotype |
This patient has a gene–gene interaction that may worsen symptoms |
|||||
Posttest self-assessment question and answer
A 55-year-old patient with depression has the S/S genotype for the SERT gene (SLC6A4). Based only on this genetic result, what treatment might be preferred for this patient?
A. SSRI
B. SNRI
C. Noradrenergic TCA
Answer: C
Carriers of the Short(S) alleles for the SLC6A4 gene may be less likely to respond to SSRIs, or may respond more slowly, and may be more likely to experience adverse effects from SSRIs. Therefore, choosing an SSRI first may be fraught with inefficacy or intolerability, thus wasting time clinically while trying to obtain a treatment response. Choosing an SNRI would carry similar problems in that SNRIs have full serotonin reuptake inhibition (SRI) function as part of their dual mechanism of action. Choosing a noradrenergic TCA, would avoid this SRI mechanism and be a logical first treatment choice.
References
1.Arinami T, Gao M, Hamaguchi H, Toru M. A functional polymorphism in the promoter region of the dopamine D2 receptor gene is associated with schizophrenia. Hum Mol Genet 1997; 6:577–82.
2.Baune B, Hohoff C, Berger K, et al. Association of the COMT val158met variant with antidepressant treatment response in major depression. Neuropsychopharmacology 2008; 33:924–32.
3.Casamassima F, Huang J, Fava M, et al. Phenotypic effects of a bipolar liability gene among individuals with major depressive disorder. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2010; 153B:303–9.
4.Ferreira MA, O’Donovan MC, Meng YA, et al. Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. Collaborative genome-wide association analysis supports a role for ANK3 and CACNA1C in bipolar disorder. Nat Genet 2008; 40:1056–8.
5.Gelernter J, Cubells JF, Kidd JR, Pakstis AJ, Kidd KK. Population studies of polymorphisms of the serotonin transporter protein gene. Am J Med Genet 1999; 88:61–6.
6.Heils A, Teufel A, Petri S, et al. Allelic variation of human serotonin transporter gene expression. J Neurochemistry 1996; 66:2621–4.
7.Jönsson EG, Nothen M, Grunhage F, et al. Polymorphisms in the dopamine D2 receptor gene and their relationships to striatal dopamine receptor density of healthy volunteers. Mol Psychiatry 1999; 4:290–6.
8.Kato M, Serretti A. Review and meta-analysis of antidepressant pharmacogenetic findings in major depressive disorder. Mol Psychiatry 2010; 15:473–500.
9.Kirchheiner J, Nickchen K, Bauer M, et al. Pharmacogenetics of antidepressants and antipsychotics: the contribution of allelic variations to the phenotype of drug response. Mol Psychiatry 2004; 9:442–73.
10.Kocabas NA, Faghel C, Barreto M, et al. The impact of catechol-O-methyltransferase SNPs and haplotypes on treatment response phenotypes in major depressive disorder: a case-control association study. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 2010; 25:218–27.
11.Popp J, Leucht S, Heres S, Steimer W. Serotonin transporter polymorphisms and side effects in antidepressant therapy – a pilot study. Pharmacogenetics 2006; 7:159–66.
12.Stahl SM. Stahl’s Essential Psychopharmacology: The Prescriber’s Guide, 5th edn. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
13.Tsai SJ, Gau YT, Hong CJ, et al. Sexually dimorphic effect of catechol-O-methyltransferase val158met polymorphism on clinical response to fluoxetine in major depressive patients. J Affect Disord 2009; 113:183–7.
14.Zhang J-P, Lencz T, Malhotra AK. Dopamine D2 receptor genetic variation and clinical response to antipsychotic drug treatment: a meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2010; 167:763–72.
Patient file
The Case:
23-year-old with first depression…that’s it!
The Question:
How might psychopharmacology be delivered in the future: neuropharmacogenetic imaging?
The Dilemma:
Can genotyping and functional neuroimaging help predict successful treatment selection
Pretest self-assessment question
A 23-year-old patient with her first depression has the S/S genotype for the SERT gene, the Del/Del alleles for the D2 receptor gene, the Val/Val alleles for the COMT gene, the T/T alleles for the MTHFR gene, and the A/A alleles for the CACNA1C gene. She also had a brain fMRI completed and it shows that her right insular cortex was hypoactive. Based only on these genetic results and neuroimaging findings, what treatment might be preferred for this patient?
A. SSRI
B. An atypical antipsychotic
C. Lithium
D. NDRI like bupropion
E. A noradrenergic TCA like desipramine
F. A mood stabilizer like lamotrigine
G. A folate-boosting product such as L-methylfolate
H. CBT
Patient evaluation on intake
23-year-old woman states that she feels “sad, down, and amotivated”
Admits to all MDD symptoms except for suicidality for the last two to three months
There was no psychosocial trigger and she reported that “life was going well”
Psychiatric history
There is no premorbid psychiatric history
This is her first MDE
There has been no prior psychotropic drug treatment before this hospitalization for suicidal thinking
There are no other comorbid psychiatric disorders present
Social and personal history
Graduated college with a business degree and has a good job as a manager in a local company
This job is going very well and with minimal stress
She is in a long-term relationship with a supportive boyfriend
There are no financial concerns
Her upbringing was relatively stress free and her parents are supportive
Denies any drug or alcohol misuse
Medical history
Denies acute medical problems
Takes no medications
Family history
There is no family history of psychiatric disorder
Patient evaluation on initial visit
She is diagnosed with single-episode MDD
Question
Based on this patient’s history and current symptom profile, testing of which of the following might be useful?
SLC6A4 (SERT) gene
COMT gene
MTHFR gene
Calcium channel, voltage-dependent L-type alpha, 1c subunit (CACNA1C) gene
D2 receptor gene (DRD2)
fMRI of the insular cortex
Attending physician’s mental notes: initial evaluation
This patient is asking for a precise answer as to what type of treatment will “help her the most, the fastest, and harm her the least”
– All antidepressants are equal per regulatory agencies
– Her genetic testing is daunting in that she has the bad alleles for every gene (see Table 30.1)
She is less likely to respond to SSRI and may have more side effects
Her high-activity COMT will degrade DA more completely
She may be vulnerable to more cognitive depressive symptoms
She is less likely to respond to atypical antipsychotic augmentation
She may experience many recurring depressive episodes
Testing of any of these genes may provide information that could be considered in the management of this patient
– SLC6A4, 5HTTLPR
This patient is homozygous (i.e., has two copies) for S/S
May indicate individuals who are more likely to exhibit unsatisfactory or no response to previous SSRI treatment, or who have developed treatment-emergent side effects on SSRIs
– COMT
This patient is homozygous for (158 Val/Val, 472 G/G)
May indicate individuals with depression who are more likely to experience associated cognitive symptoms such as slowness of information processing, difficulty with executive functioning, and problem solving
– CACNA1C, G>A rs1006737
This patient is homozygous for (A/A)
The A allele may indicate individuals with mood disorders who are more likely to experience frequent relapses and recurrences
– DRD2, -141C insertion/deletion (rs1799732)
This patient is homozygous for (Del/Del)
May indicate individuals who are less likely to benefit from augmentation with an atypical antipsychotic, in the event that they do not respond to an antidepressant (compared to those who carry the Ins allele)
– MTHFR, 677 C>T
This patient is heterozygous for T/T
The T allele may indicate individuals with depression who are more likely to experience associated cognitive symptoms, especially in those who also express the Val variant of the COMT gene
As this is her index depressive episode, treating her to remission quickly and avoiding relapses and recurrences is the primary goal, similar to an index episode of schizophrenia or mania
It seems that no medication is an ideal choice and genetic testing really has failed to guide prescribing toward a clear, concise choice of antidepressant
Testing via fMRI suggests depression exists when the DLPFC is hypoactive and the limbic system is hyperactive
– This patient has this typical depression finding in her limbic area, which may help aid in diagnosis but does not help in treatment selection
– This patient also has a novel finding that her right insular cortex is hypoactive
Initial studies suggest that this hypoactivity predicts a response to CBT but not SSRI
Alternatively, if hyperactivity were detected, then response to SSRI is favored and CBT would likely be ineffective
