- •Table of contents
- •In This World by Donna Fargo 68
- •Northeastern State University
- •College of Education
- •Conceptual framework
- •Vision Statement
- •Conceptual framework continued
- •Educators as Leaders will:
- •III. Educators as Developers of Human Potential will:
- •Conceptual framework continued
- •Fall 2011 Pre II Internship Calendar
- •Nov. 18, Friday Last day to submit/resubmit any competency to Chalk & Wire
- •Student resources:
- •Professional dress is required at all seminars and placement interviews
- •Professional dress is required for Internship visits, at all seminars and Full Internship placement interviews
- •Student instructions for northeastern state university education
- •Meet and Greet Required Contents
- •1Field Experience Activity Record – Pre-Internship II
- •Northeastern State University Observation/Evaluation of the Lesson
- •1: Communication
- •2: Showing topic
- •3: Relating subject topics
- •4: Use of signal responses
- •5: Teaches Objectives
- •6: Skills Demonstration
- •7: Positive reinforcement
- •8: Checks student progress
- •9: Instructional changes
- •10: Requiring practices
- •11: Summarization Practices
- •12: Student unsupervised practice
- •13: Grading pattern usage
- •14: Building student self-awareness
- •15: Interaction with students
- •16: Fair and firm treatment
- •17: Rapport development
- •18: Growth and development awareness
- •19: Idea acceptance
- •20: Acknowledging students' accomplishments
- •22: Lesson plan design
- •23: Activity selection
- •24: Time on task
- •25: Time use efficiency
- •26: Defining expected behavior
- •28: Mutual courtesy
- •29: Rapport with students
- •30: Personal organization
- •31: Written record maintenance
- •32: Lesson plan design
- •33: Professionalism
- •34: Self expression
- •35: Educational theories and practices
- •36: Overall lesson evaluation
- •Nsu 2pre-intern II Responsibilities
- •Activities
- •Example only
- •Northeastern State University – College of Education
- •Final evaluation form
- •Portfolio
- •Portfolio checkpoints & courses from which artifacts will be created & assessed (Courses are dependent upon major)
- •Portfolio Artifact Cover Sheet Tips
- •Portfolio Competency 11 Assignment Instructions
- •Submit Comp. 11, in Chalk and Wire, to Lereen Neugin by the due date (See Pre-II Calendar in the handbook)
- •Instructions:
- •1. Preparation: The teacher plans for the delivery of the lesson relative to short-term and long-term objectives.
- •2. Routine: The teacher uses minimum class time for non- instructional routines, thus maximizing time on task.
- •3. Discipline: The teacher clearly defines expected behavior, encourages positive behavior and controls negative behavior.
- •4. Learning environment: The teacher establishes rapport with students and
- •1. Establishes objectives: The teacher communicates the instructional objectives to students.
- •2. Stresses sequence: The teacher shows how the present topic is related to those
- •3. Relates objectives: The teacher relates subject topics to existing student
- •4. Involves all learners: The teacher uses signaled responses, questioning
- •5. Explains content: The teacher teaches the objectives through a variety of methods.
- •6. Explains directions: The teacher gives directions that are clearly stated and related to the learning objectives.
- •7. Models: The teacher demonstrates the desired skills.
- •8. Monitors: The teacher checks to determine if students are progressing toward stated objectives.
- •9. Adjusts based on monitoring: The teacher changes instruction based on the
- •2. Student files: The teacher maintains a written record of student progress.
- •3. Grading patterns: The teacher uses grading patterns that are fairly administered and based on identified criteria.
- •Nsu lesson plan template
- •Instructional design
- •Nsu unit plan template
- •Instructional design
- •Instructional design (con’t)
- •Sample Reflection and Self Evaluation Rubric
- •In This World
Sample Reflection and Self Evaluation Rubric
FYI: This is provided for your information as a resource
to improve your post-lesson reflection
“As teachers we must believe in change, must know it is possible, or we wouldn’t be teaching – because education is a constant process of change.
Every single time you “teach” something to someone, it is ingested, something is done with it, and a new human being emerges.”
~ Leo Buscaglia
Reflection and Self Evaluation Rubric: |
|
|||
|
Unacceptable |
Acceptable |
Target |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
||
Evidence of Impact on |
No evidence or reasons |
Provides simplistic, |
Uses evidence to support conclusions of student |
|
student learning |
provided to support any |
superficial reasons or |
learning. Explores multiple hypotheses for why |
|
(Reflection Questions 7.a) |
conclusions of student |
hypotheses to support |
students did or did not meet learning goals |
|
|
learning |
conclusions of student learning |
|
|
Self-Evaluation |
Minimal self-reflections |
General reflections are |
Specific reflections are given that focus on the |
|
(Reflection Question |
are given. |
provided focusing on |
impact of the experience on student learning. |
|
7.b) |
|
teacher behaviors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implications for Future |
Provides no ideas or |
Provides ideas for |
Provides ideas for redesigning learning goals, instruction, and assessment and explains why these modifications would improve student learning. |
|
Teaching. |
inappropriate ideas for |
redesigning learning |
||
(Reflection Question 7.c) |
redesigning learning |
goals, instruction and |
||
|
goals, instruction, and |
assessment but offers no |
||
|
assessment. |
rationale for why these changes |
||
|
|
would improve student learning. |
|
|
First Interpretation of |
Interpretation is |
Interpretation is |
Interpretation is meaningful, and appropriate |
|
data of impact on learning from Sub |
inaccurate, and conclusions are missing |
technically accurate, but conclusions |
conclusions are drawn from data. |
|
Group/Individual |
or unsupported by data |
are missing or not fully supported |
|
|
(Reflection Question |
|
by data. |
|
|
7.d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Interpretation of data of impact on |
Interpretation is inaccurate, and conclusions are missing |
Interpretation is technically accurate but conclusions are |
Interpretation is meaningful, and appropriate conclusions are drawn from data; planned interventions address |
|
learning from Sub Group/Individual |
or unsupported by data. No interventions given. |
missing or not fully supported by data; planned interventions |
student/group difficulties |
|
(Reflection Question |
|
do not address student/group |
|
|
7.e) |
|
Difficulties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Message of Thanks to All the Great Teachers