- •Статьи для перевода на русский язык
- •Dating and Family Relationships in the Workplace: Should You Have a Policy? (8/11)
- •Summer Increase to irs Standard Mileage Rate (8/11)
- •Fragrance Sinsitivities at Work: Irritant or ada Issue? (8/11)
- •Are Written Policies Contracts? (8/11)
- •Notice Requirements for Policy Changes (8/11)
- •Are Your Exempt Classifications a Lawsuit Waiting to Happen? (7/11)
- •Gross Misconduct and cobra (7/11)
- •Supreme Court Rejects Giant Wal-Mart Class Action Discrimination Suit (7/11)
- •Employers Beware: The nlrb Is Targeting Nonunion Employers (6/11)
- •1099 Reporting Provision Repealed at Last (6/11)
- •New dol Phone App Underscores Importance of Accurate flsa Records (6/11)
- •Employee Medical Files (6/11)
- •It’s Official - Everyone (Almost) is Disabled Now Under New ada Regs (5/11)
- •Moonlighting: How to Deal with Employees’ Second Jobs (4/11)
- •Five Tips to Address Negative Facebook and other Social Media Postings (4/11)
- •Is “Being Unemployed” the Next Protected Class? (4/11)
- •Congress Closer to Passing 1099 Reporting Provision Repeal (4/11)
- •Medical Marijuana in the Workplace (4/11)
- •Guns in the Workplace (4/11)
- •Five Ways the dol Makes It Easier for Employees to Sue You (3/11)
- •Unanimous Supreme Court Broadens Title VII Retaliation Protections (3/11)
- •Can You Make Flexible Work Arrangements "Work" for You? (3/11)
- •Six Keys to Effective Performance Evaluations (2/11)
- •New Regulations on the Executive Agenda: How Will They Affect Your Workplace? (2/11)
- •New Year's Check Up: Do You Have the Right Workplace Posters (1/11)
- •Congress Extends Expiring Tax Cuts; Cuts Payroll Taxes for Employees (1/11)
- •Requiring Medical Certification for All Sick Days (1/11)
- •Irs Delays New w-2 Reporting Requirement (12/10)
- •Gina Final Regulations Finally Issued (12/10)
- •Paying Nonexempt Employees a Fixed Salary (12/10)
- •Reassignment Obligations and the ada (11/10)
- •Per Diem Rates Decline for Business Travel Expenses (11/10)
- •Be Careful Using Unpaid Suspensions to Discipline Exempt Employees (11/10)
- •Health Care Dependent Coverage Regulations Issued (10/10)
- •Health Care 1099 Reporting Rule Will Create New Tax Burden (10/10)
- •Modest Pay Increases Expected for 2011 as Economy Tries to Recover (10/10)
- •Required Leave for Part-Time Pregnant Employee (10/10)
- •Overtime When Paid Time Off Taken During Week (10/10)
- •You're Not Paranoid if Someone Really Is Watching You: Monitoring Employee Use of Social Media (9/10)
- •Tuition Tax Break Set to Expire (9/10)
- •Dol Clarifies Who Can Be Considered Like a Parent Under fmla (9/10)
- •Employee Benefits Remain Stable as Recession Lingers (9/10)
- •Independent Contractor Classification Causes Confusion, Potential Penalties (8/10)
- •New Child Labor Regs Expand "Safe" Jobs for Teens (8/10)
- •Pay for Employee Who Clocks In Early (8/10)
- •Your Harassment Response is Key to Prevent Liability (7/10)
- •Cobra Subsidy Expires - Will it Be Renewed? (7/10)
- •Supreme Court Allows Search of Public Employee's Text Messages (7/10)
- •Wage Overpayments (7/10)
- •Disclosing Status of Employee with Medical Problem (7/10)
- •Twelve Steps to Effective Workplace Searches (6/10)
- •New Laws Give Employers Hiring Incentive (6/10)
- •Ftc Requires Employees to Disclose Relationship on Blogs, Social Media (6/10)
- •How to Deal with an Employee with a Drinking Problem (6/10)
- •Voluntary Unpaid Vacation (6/10)
- •Can Anything Be Done to Stop the Avalanche of Wage and Hour Litigation? a Few Class Action Avoidance Options (5/10)
- •New Health Care Act Requires Breaks for Nursing Mothers (5/10)
- •Flsa Investigations: What to Expect When the dol Pays a Visit (5/10)
- •Job Demotion Because of Absenteeism (5/10)
- •Consider Religious Accommodations to Improve Employee Relations (4/10)
- •Cobra Subsidy Extended Only Through March; More to Come? (4/10)
- •Know Your Obligations Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (fcra) (4/10)
- •Is it Time to Revisit Your Distracted Driving Policy (3/10)
- •Make Better Promotion Decisions (3/10)
- •Irs and Obama Administration Target Independent Contractors (3/10)
- •Summer Increase to irs Standard Mileage Rate (8/11)
Voluntary Unpaid Vacation (6/10)
We are trying to cut costs and are considering asking employees to volunteer to take an unpaid week off from work. Is this practice legal?
As the current economic downturn begins to show some signs of a slow recovery, employers in all industries are still looking for creative ways to cut expenses without cutting staff. One such practice is requiring employees to take unpaid vacation. For example, Dell Computers made the news in late 2008 when it asked employees to consider taking up to five days of unpaid leave as part of a package of cost-cutting measures. While it generally is legal to require employees to take full weeks off, this practice may not achieve the results you expect. Let’s take a look at the legal issues first, and in particular the treatment of nonexempt and exempt employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Nonexempt employees are those employees who are covered by the FLSA’s overtime and minimum wage provisions. Nonexempt employees only have to be paid for time actually worked and generally do not have to be guaranteed any specific number of hours of work in a week (assuming they are not covered by a collective bargaining agreement or a contract specifying otherwise). Accordingly, you can ask (or even require) your nonexempt employees to take an unpaid week off. You also can require them to take just a day or less off without pay. Exempt employees should be handled a little more carefully. They are exempt from the FLSA’s minimum wage and overtime requirements because of the nature of their job duties and the fact that they are paid on a salary basis. The most common exempt classifications include executive, administrative, and professional employees, outside sales employees, highly-skilled computer-related employees, and highly compensated employees. The term “salary basis” is defined by the FLSA regulations as the payment on a weekly or less frequent basis of a predetermined amount that constitutes all or part of compensation, without reductions for variations in the quality or quantity of the work performed. Under this definition, exempt employees generally must receive their full salary for any week in which they perform work, without regard to the number of days or hours worked. However, you do not have to pay exempt employees for weeks in which they perform no work. Therefore, as long as you are asking exempt employees to take a full week off, you will not jeopardize their exempt status. Note, though, that you should not ask exempt employees to take less than a full week off unpaid. As long as the employee is ready, willing, and able to work, reductions in pay may not be made for time when work is not available in a week when the employee has performed work. Deductions may be made for less than full weeks only in limited circumstances, such as for full day absences for personal reasons or under a bona fide sick policy. Even a “voluntary” unpaid day off likely would not meet these criteria, though, particularly if it is initiated by the employer. While voluntary unpaid vacation weeks have helped some companies manage short-term cash-flow problems, others have found that it creates planning and administrative hassles. On the one hand, if too many employees take the unpaid time off, you may experience staffing problems. Alternatively, if too few employees take you up on the offer, you may have to be prepared to engage in other cost-cutting methods, such as reduced work hours or temporary layoffs. In addition, you have to consider potential negative employee reactions, particularly by employees who are financially unable to take an unpaid week off but who feel pressured to do so. So, make sure you have thought through all of the potential risks and benefits of a voluntary unpaid vacation policy before you implement one.