- •Статьи для перевода на русский язык
- •Dating and Family Relationships in the Workplace: Should You Have a Policy? (8/11)
- •Summer Increase to irs Standard Mileage Rate (8/11)
- •Fragrance Sinsitivities at Work: Irritant or ada Issue? (8/11)
- •Are Written Policies Contracts? (8/11)
- •Notice Requirements for Policy Changes (8/11)
- •Are Your Exempt Classifications a Lawsuit Waiting to Happen? (7/11)
- •Gross Misconduct and cobra (7/11)
- •Supreme Court Rejects Giant Wal-Mart Class Action Discrimination Suit (7/11)
- •Employers Beware: The nlrb Is Targeting Nonunion Employers (6/11)
- •1099 Reporting Provision Repealed at Last (6/11)
- •New dol Phone App Underscores Importance of Accurate flsa Records (6/11)
- •Employee Medical Files (6/11)
- •It’s Official - Everyone (Almost) is Disabled Now Under New ada Regs (5/11)
- •Moonlighting: How to Deal with Employees’ Second Jobs (4/11)
- •Five Tips to Address Negative Facebook and other Social Media Postings (4/11)
- •Is “Being Unemployed” the Next Protected Class? (4/11)
- •Congress Closer to Passing 1099 Reporting Provision Repeal (4/11)
- •Medical Marijuana in the Workplace (4/11)
- •Guns in the Workplace (4/11)
- •Five Ways the dol Makes It Easier for Employees to Sue You (3/11)
- •Unanimous Supreme Court Broadens Title VII Retaliation Protections (3/11)
- •Can You Make Flexible Work Arrangements "Work" for You? (3/11)
- •Six Keys to Effective Performance Evaluations (2/11)
- •New Regulations on the Executive Agenda: How Will They Affect Your Workplace? (2/11)
- •New Year's Check Up: Do You Have the Right Workplace Posters (1/11)
- •Congress Extends Expiring Tax Cuts; Cuts Payroll Taxes for Employees (1/11)
- •Requiring Medical Certification for All Sick Days (1/11)
- •Irs Delays New w-2 Reporting Requirement (12/10)
- •Gina Final Regulations Finally Issued (12/10)
- •Paying Nonexempt Employees a Fixed Salary (12/10)
- •Reassignment Obligations and the ada (11/10)
- •Per Diem Rates Decline for Business Travel Expenses (11/10)
- •Be Careful Using Unpaid Suspensions to Discipline Exempt Employees (11/10)
- •Health Care Dependent Coverage Regulations Issued (10/10)
- •Health Care 1099 Reporting Rule Will Create New Tax Burden (10/10)
- •Modest Pay Increases Expected for 2011 as Economy Tries to Recover (10/10)
- •Required Leave for Part-Time Pregnant Employee (10/10)
- •Overtime When Paid Time Off Taken During Week (10/10)
- •You're Not Paranoid if Someone Really Is Watching You: Monitoring Employee Use of Social Media (9/10)
- •Tuition Tax Break Set to Expire (9/10)
- •Dol Clarifies Who Can Be Considered Like a Parent Under fmla (9/10)
- •Employee Benefits Remain Stable as Recession Lingers (9/10)
- •Independent Contractor Classification Causes Confusion, Potential Penalties (8/10)
- •New Child Labor Regs Expand "Safe" Jobs for Teens (8/10)
- •Pay for Employee Who Clocks In Early (8/10)
- •Your Harassment Response is Key to Prevent Liability (7/10)
- •Cobra Subsidy Expires - Will it Be Renewed? (7/10)
- •Supreme Court Allows Search of Public Employee's Text Messages (7/10)
- •Wage Overpayments (7/10)
- •Disclosing Status of Employee with Medical Problem (7/10)
- •Twelve Steps to Effective Workplace Searches (6/10)
- •New Laws Give Employers Hiring Incentive (6/10)
- •Ftc Requires Employees to Disclose Relationship on Blogs, Social Media (6/10)
- •How to Deal with an Employee with a Drinking Problem (6/10)
- •Voluntary Unpaid Vacation (6/10)
- •Can Anything Be Done to Stop the Avalanche of Wage and Hour Litigation? a Few Class Action Avoidance Options (5/10)
- •New Health Care Act Requires Breaks for Nursing Mothers (5/10)
- •Flsa Investigations: What to Expect When the dol Pays a Visit (5/10)
- •Job Demotion Because of Absenteeism (5/10)
- •Consider Religious Accommodations to Improve Employee Relations (4/10)
- •Cobra Subsidy Extended Only Through March; More to Come? (4/10)
- •Know Your Obligations Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (fcra) (4/10)
- •Is it Time to Revisit Your Distracted Driving Policy (3/10)
- •Make Better Promotion Decisions (3/10)
- •Irs and Obama Administration Target Independent Contractors (3/10)
- •Summer Increase to irs Standard Mileage Rate (8/11)
Moonlighting: How to Deal with Employees’ Second Jobs (4/11)
Second, and even third, jobs are a fact of today’s work life, so you need to be prepared to cope with employees’ split allegiances. Find out five ways to help balance an employee’s outside employment with your organization’s performance expectations.
The issue of outside employment is a challenge for many organizations. On one side, you may be concerned that “moonlighting” will lead to divided allegiances, conflicts of interest, and poor job performance. However, employers also recognize that employees take second jobs for many legitimate reasons, including the need for extra income and the desire to learn new skills. Further, most employers cannot, and do not want to, control their employees’ off-duty activities. In addition, both employers and employees are embracing new relationships that include the use of part-time and temporary workers and innovations such as job sharing and telecommuting. As a result, workers with multiple jobs are a growing segment of the market, and attitudes toward outside employment and strict loyalty to one employer are changing. Why Employees Take Second Jobs The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that in 2009, 7.3 million workers held more than one job and the multiple jobholding rate was 5.2% of the working population. As an employer, then, you should understand the motivations for secondary employment. People generally take extra jobs for several reasons: 1. To meet current expenses or pay off debt. Financial problems may be temporary, such as when an employee’s spouse is between jobs, and the employee only needs a second job on a short-term basis. Or, the problems can be ongoing because the employee’s salary is too low or does not keep pace with inflation, or the employee is overextended. In these cases, the employee often commits to a second job for an extended or indefinite period. 2. To earn extra money. Some employees may be working an extra job to earn additional cash for a particular purchase, such as a home or car. These jobs tend to be temporary until the goal is met. 3. To gain further work experience. Some employees want to acquire new skills that they cannot get in their present job. Others use second jobs to explore career changes. 4. To balance work and outside obligations. A few employees work multiple part-time jobs, as opposed to a single full-time one, to allow more flexibility for personal obligations such as child and elder care or to pursue recreational interests. Determining the Need for a Policy Most HR experts point out that the purposes behind a moonlighting policy are important and should be communicated. Typically, this policy should explain the employer’s performance expectations, warn against conflicts of interest and remind of confidentiality and noncompete requirements. At the same time, however, some experts think that a separate policy focusing on employees’ off-duty activities can create an atmosphere of mistrust. Proponents of a separate policy counter this argument by emphasizing that a well-written policy can reinforce the employer’s position and make employees consider more carefully the possible strains a second job can create. Outside employment policies often are used by organizations that have numerous employees who work second jobs and by those that do not have separate conflict of interest of confidentiality policies. Legal Aspects of Outside Employment Policies You also should consider the potential legal issues that can arise from regulating outside employment. As a general rule, courts have determined that private employers may prohibit employees from moonlighting and may terminate employees for doing so, unless there is an agreement otherwise. However, a few states, including Colorado and New York, have enacted statutes that restrict organizations from making employment decisions based on an employee’s lawful off-duty conduct, which could include second jobs. These statutes generally allow employers to prohibit second jobs only when that employment creates a conflict of interest with the worker’s duties to the employer. For example, Colorado prohibits termination based on any legal off-duty conduct unless the restriction is related to a bona fide occupational requirement, is reasonably related to the employment activities of an employee or group of employees, or is necessary to prevent an actual or apparent conflict of interest. And, New York prohibits employers from discriminating against employees for using any legal product, like tobacco or alcohol, while off-duty and off the premises; engaging in legal political or recreational activity while off-duty and off the premises; or belonging to a union. Accordingly, you should consult with legal counsel to determine if state restrictions apply. The ability of public employers to restrict outside employment is more limited than for the private sector. For the most part, public employers must show the need to prevent actual or apparent conflicts of interest. However, they generally may require prior approval of any outside employment. Five Points to Address Concerning Outside Employment Whether you decide to have a separate moonlighting policy or incorporate the issues into existing policies, you should take into account both your concern to prevent conflicts and the employee’s need or desire to work. By doing so, you can strike a fair balance and develop legally sound policies that address everyone’s interests. To help achieve this balance, the policy should include the following five provisions: 1. A requirement that employees inform you of any outside employment. In addition, they should be required to obtain prior permission before pursuing the activity. 2. A review process for requests and specific criteria for approval. Request from higher-level and exempt employees may be evaluated using more stringent criteria than requests from others. A single person or department should be responsible for the final decision. 3. A statement prohibiting behaviors that negatively impact the employer. In particular, you should prohibit competition with the employer; the performance or solicitation of outside business during paid working time; the use of the employer’s tools or equipment for outside work; any work activity that would adversely affect the employer’s image; and the use of certain paid absences for outside employment. The policy also should discourage any work activity that affects the employee’s job performance, punctuality, loyalty, and ability to fulfill other responsibilities of the primary job. (See also # 5, below.) 4. A provision addressing outside employment when an employee is on a leave of absence, such as leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Many employers prohibit employees from self employment or working a second job while on a leave of absence, with the exception of public service or military leaves. Others allow employees to work in pre-approved second jobs during an FMLA leave as long as their reason for leave does not preclude the outside employment. For example, an employee on FMLA leave to care for a seriously ill family member during the normal work day is still able to work a second job during the evening hours, but an employee on leave for his own serious health condition may not be able to perform a second job. The FMLA allows you to apply a policy restricting outside employment to employees who take FMLA leave as long as the policy is applied uniformly. However, if you do not prohibit outside employment during FMLA, you cannot deny the employee any FMLA benefits if an employee continues working at a second job while taking FMLA leave from his primary job. 5. A reminder regarding disciplinary action if the outside work causes or contributes to job-related problems. As an alternative to strict regulation of off-duty conduct, you should reinforce your intent to address on a continuing basis specific job performance or conflict-of-interest problems related to secondary employment.