- •1. Grammatical category. Grammatical meaning. Grammatical form
- •2. Theory of oppositions. Types of oppositions. Oppositions in morphology
- •3. Morpheme. Derivation morphemes and inflection morphemes
- •4. Distributional analysis. Morphemic analysis. Ic-analysis
- •1. Noun
- •2. Adjective
- •3. Pronoun
- •4. Numeral
- •5. The verb
- •7. The adverb
- •8. Prepositions
- •9. Conjunctions
- •10. Particles
- •11. Interjections
- •1. General characteristics
- •2. The category of number
- •3. The category of case
- •4. The Problem of Gender in English
- •5. The Category of Determination
- •1. A General Outline of the Verb as a Part of Speech
- •2. Classification of Verbs
- •3. The Category of Person
- •4. The Category of Number
- •5. The category of tense
- •6. The category of aspect
- •7. The category of temporal correlation
- •1. The category of voice
- •2. The Category of Mood
- •3. Mood and Modality
- •4. Oppositional reduction of verbal categories
- •Introductory
- •1. A general outline of the adjective
- •2. Classification of adjectives
- •3. The problem of the category of state
- •4. The category of comparison
- •5. The Adverb
- •1. A General Outline of Functional Parts of Speech
- •2. The Preposition
- •3. The Conjunction
- •4. The Particle
- •5. The Interjection
- •6. The Modal Word
- •1. The phrase as the basic unit of syntax.
- •2. Types of phrases
- •3. Types of syntactic relations
- •1. The notion of sentence. The sentence as a language unit
- •2. Classifications of simple sentences
- •1. The traditional scheme of sentence parsing
- •2. The main sentence parts: the subject and the predicate, their types
- •3. The Secondary Sentence Parts
- •4. Structural Schemes of the Sentence. The Elementary Sentence
- •5. Syntactic Processes
- •1. Semantic Roles and Semantic Configurations
- •2. Actual Division of the Sentence
- •3. Language means of expressing the theme and the rheme
- •1. The Definition of the Composite Sentence
- •2. Compound Sentences
- •3. Complex Sentences
- •4. Asyndetic Sentences
- •5. Transition From Simple To Composite Sentences
- •6. Mixed type of composite sentences
- •1. Semantics and Pragmatics
- •2. Indirect Meaning of the Utterance
- •1. Speech acts theory. Classification of speech acts
- •2. Pragmatic transposition of sentences
- •1. Conversational Implicature
- •2. The Cooperative principle and Grice’s maxims
- •3. The Politeness principle and Leech’s maxims
- •1. Text as an Object of Linguistic Research
- •2. Cohesion and Coherence
- •3. Textual Categories
- •4. Textual Units. Supra-Phrasal Unity and Paragraph
4. Structural Schemes of the Sentence. The Elementary Sentence
There are no structural limits for increasing the size of the sentence and
expanding its structure, however, the opposite procedure has a specific limit, the
limit being the elementary sentence. Omission of some element of the elementary
sentence destroys it as a structural and semantic unit.
Thus, the sentence “A low rumbling sound had broken the silence around
them.” (from Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone) can be made more
complicated by adding new attributes, introducing dependent clauses, inserting
modal words, etc. The process will have no end. However, omission of elements
that do not affect the structural and semantic completeness of the sentence can go
on until it meets a certain limit. Such limit for the sentence under consideration is
“A sound had broken the silence”. It realizes the syntactic structure made up by the
subject + a simple predicate expressed by a verb of non-prepositional directivity +
a direct object.
The structural scheme of the sentence is a sentence structure minimal
by its composition and simplest by grammatical and semantic structure. A
construction built according to a structural scheme and realizing all of its
components is called an elementary sentence. Prof. Pocheptsov lists some
structural schemes for verbal sentences and examples of corresponding elementary
sentences:
Structural schemes Elementary sentences
Subject – predicate expressed by a verb of nondirected
action (Active Voice)
Pages rustle. (S. Bedford)
Subject – predicate expressed by a verb of nonprepositional-
object directivity (Active Voice)
– direct object
Моr was enjoying the port.
(I. Murdoch)
Subject – predicate expressed by a verb
requiring two non-prepositional objects: object
of addressee and object of patient (Active
voice) – non-prepositional object of addressee
– non-prepositional object of patient
'I've taught him that.' (J. Galsworthy)
Subject – predicate expressed by a verb of
spatial directivity (Active Voice) – adverbial
modifier of place
The Judge is in the chair. (S. Bedford)
Subject – predicate expressed by a verb of
temporal directivity (Active Voice) – adverbial
modifier of time
That was long ago. (P. Abrahams)
Subject – predicate expressed by a verb of nonprepositional
object directivity (Passive Voice)
They had been seized. (H.G. Wells)
The set of structural schemes specific to every language is the initial basis
for building actual sentences as facts of speech.
One point that should be mentioned here is the status of passive sentences.
The question is whether they should be included into the set of structural schemes
as active sentences or whether they should be regarded as secondary constructions
built on the basis of active sentences. As it has been shown by psycholinguistic
experiments, passive sentences do not appear in actual speech as results of
transforming active sentences. Besides that, there are some passive sentences that
do not have corresponding active sentences (eg. I was born in France.). Therefore,
a passive sentence is not a derivative of an active one but an independent
syntactical phenomenon.
The total number of structural schemes in a language is a few dozens of
units.