Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Учебники / Genetic Hearing Loss Willems 2004

.pdf
Скачиваний:
131
Добавлен:
07.06.2016
Размер:
3.5 Mб
Скачать

44

Govaerts

Audiometric Tests and Diagnostic Workup

45

areas where rubella vaccination is not common practice, serological examination is probably justified.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a frequent cause of congenital infections [0.4–2.3% of live births (18)] and may cause congenital hearing loss. Prenatal diagnosis is possible and provides the optimal means for both diagnosing fetal infection and identifying fetuses at risk of severe sequelae (19). Serological evaluation is possible on blood samples and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) diagnosis is possible on urine samples.

D.Imaging

Refining the diagnosis means searching for the etiology.

Middle ear problems often consist of atresia and/or ossicular malformations. In most cases these can be readily seen on high-resolution CT scan (Fig. 4). Therefore, a congenital conductive hearing loss makes a CT scan mandatory. This can be done under sedation or anesthesia if necessary.

Sensorineural hearing losses are mainly caused by cochlear problems (large vestibular aqueduct, Mondini dysplasia, semicircular canal malformations) and to a lesser extent by central auditory lesions, situated in the auditory nerve (aplasia or hypoplasia), the auditory pathways, or the auditory cortex. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (Fig. 5) may elucidate the details and is often complementary to CT, especially in the study of inner-ear malformations (20). Routine T2-weighted spin-echo images of the brain are

Figure 5 MRI for congenital sensorineural hearing loss (courtesy J. Casselman). Axial 0.7-mm-thick T2-weighted gradient-echo images and sagittal reconstructions perpendicular to the course of the nerves made at the level of the fundus of the internal auditory canal (IAC) through both the right (A, C) and the left (B, D) inner ear in a patient with congenital deafness on the left side. (A) Normal facial nerve (large black arrow), inferior vestibular (black arrowhead), and cochlear (small black arrowhead) branch of the VIIIth nerve can be seen near the floor of the IAC. (B) The facial nerve (large black arrow) and inferior vestibular branch of the VIIIth nerve (black arrowhead) can again be distinguished; however, the cochlear branch of the VIIIth nerve is absent (small black arrow). (C) The facial nerve (large black arrow), superior vestibular (double arrowhead), inferior vestibular (arrowhead), and cochlear (small black arrow) branch of the VIIIth nerve can all be seen on the reconstruction made at the fundus of the right IAC. (D) The facial nerve (large black arrow), superior vestibular (double arrowhead), and inferior vestibular branch (arrowhead) of the VIIIth nerve can again be seen. This image confirms the congenital absence of the cochlear branch of the VIIIth nerve (small black arrow).

46

Govaerts

ideally suited to exclude white-matter disease or other lesions in the cochlear nuclei and along the auditory pathways. Only MR can demonstrate the abnormal course, hypoplasia, or aplasia of the vestibulocochlear nerve and facial nerve (21). MR techniques have to be adapted for inner-ear malformations. Only heavily T2-weighted gradient-echo sequences, such as threedimensional Fourier transform constructive interference in steady state (3DFT-CISS), true-fast imaging with steady precession (true-FISP), or 3Dfast spin-echo (3D-FSE) sequences, are suitable for this purpose (22). Moreover, some changes inside the membranous labyrinth can only be seen on submillimetric (0.7 mm thickness) heavily T2-weighted MR images. A CT can be complementary to evaluate the abnormal internal auditory canal or facial nerve canal. Thin CT images (reconstructed 1- or 1.25-mm-thick images every 0.5 or even 0.1 mm) yield detailed information on the bony labyrinth, including modiolus and even the osseous spiral lamina, but they do not give any information on the fluid in the lanyrinthine compartments, which can only be seen on MR images.

E.Ophthalmological Examination with Fundoscopy

One of the most frequent ocular problems linked with congenital hearing loss is retinitis pigmentosa (Usher syndrome). This is seen on fundoscopy. The first signs of retinitis, however, appear no sooner than at the age of a couple of years and often even much later. Therefore, a negative ophthalmological examination is no proof of the absence of Usher syndrome. Electroretinography may provide early diagnosis from the age of 2 years onward and some authors claim that all children with severe to profound, prelingual sensorineural hearing loss should be screened by ophthalmological examination including electroretinogram (23).

Other syndromes may consist of early onset eye problems, such as retinopathy, optic atrophy, or iridal or corneal anomalies.

F.Electrocardiogram

An electrocardiogram is routinely taken to exclude the long Q-T syndrome (Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome).

G.Ultrasound Examination of the Renal System

Ultrasound examination of the kidneys is important to rule out any renal structural malformation, e.g., in the branchio-oto-renal syndrome (BOR).

Audiometric Tests and Diagnostic Workup

47

H.Urine

Urine examination should exclude microscopic hematuria and proteinuria, although the latter is uncommon in children. It is also useful for detecting cytomegalovirus by PCR techniques.

REFERENCES

1.ASHA American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Guidelines for audiometric symbols. ASHA 1990; 20(suppl 2):25–30.

2.Govaerts PJ, Casselman J, Daemers K, De Ceulaer G, Peeters S, Somers TH, O eciers FE. Audiological findings in the large vestibular aqueduct syndrome. Int J Pediatr ORL 1999; 51:157–164.

3.Kemp DT. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 64:1386–1391.

4.Khanna SM, Leonard DG. Measurement of basilar membrane vibrations and evaluation of cochlear condition. Hearing Res 1986; 23:37–53.

5.Sellick PM, Patuzzi R, Johnstone BM. Measurements of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mo¨ssbauer technique. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 72:131–141.

6.White KR, Vohr BR, Maxon AB, Behrens TR, McPherson MG, Mauk GW. Screening all newborns for hearing loss using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1994; 29(3):203–217.

7.Govaerts PJ, De Ceulaer G, Yperman M, Van Driessche K, Somers TH, O eciers FE. A two-stage, bipodal screening model for universal neonatal hearing screening. Otol Neurotol 2001; 22(6):850–854.

8.Reardon W, Co ey R, Chowdhurry T, Grossman A, Jan H, Britton K, Kendall-Taylor P, Trembath R. Prevalence, age of onset, and natural history of thyroid disease in Pendred syndrome. J Med Genet 1999; 36(8):595–598.

9.Van Camp G, Smith RJH. Hereditary Hearing loss Homepage. World Wide Web URL: http://www.uia.ac.be/dnalab/hhh/. (October, 1996).

10.Dahl HH, Saunders K, Kelly TM, Osborn AH, Wilcox S, Cone-Wesson B, Wunderlich JL, Du Sart D, Kamarinos M, Gardner RJ, Dennehy S, Williamson R, Vallance N, Mutton P. Prevalence and nature of connexin 26 mutations in children with non-syndromic deafness. Med J Aust 2001; 175(4): 182–183.

11.Kenna MA, Wu BL, Cotanche DA, Korf BR, Rehm HL. Connexin 26 studies in patients with sensorineural hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 127(9):1037–1042.

12.Milunsky JM, Maher TA, Yosunkaya E, Vohr BR. Connexin-26 gene analysis in hearing-impaired newborns. Genet Test 2000; 4(4):345–349.

13.Morell RJ, Kim HJ, Hood LJ, et al. Mutations in the connexin 26 gene (GJB2) among Ashkenazi Jews with nonsyndromic recessive deafness. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:1500–1505.

48

Govaerts

14.Lerer I, Sagi M, Malamud E, Levi H, Raas-Rothschild A, Abeliovich D. Contribution of connexin 26 mutations to nonsyndromic deafness in Ashkenazi patients and the variable phenotypic e ect of the mutation 167delT. Am J Med Genet 2000; 6:53–56.

15.Zhang S, Zhao C, Yu L. Analysis of sensorineural hearing loss in 77 children. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi 1997; 11(6):252–254.

16.Scott DA, Wang R, Kreman TM, Andrews M, McDonald JM, Bishop JR, Smith RJ, Karniski LP, She eld VC. Functional di erences of the PDS gene product are asspociated with phenotypic variation in patients with Pendred syndrome and nonsyndromic hearing loss (DFNB4). Hum Mol Genet 2000; 1709–1715.

17.Zimmerman L, Reef SE. Incidence of congenital rubella syndrome at a hospital seving a predominantly Hispanic population. Pediatrics 2001; 107(3):E40.

18.Witters I, Van Ranst M, Fryns JP. Cytomegalovirus reactivation in pregnancy and subsequent isolated bilateral loss in the infant. Genet Couns 2000; 11(4): 375–378.

19.Azam AZ, Vial Y, Fawer CL, Zu erey J, Hohfeld P. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97(3):443–448.

20.Casselman JW, O eciers FE, De Foer B, Govaerts P, Kuhweide R, Somers TH. CT and MR imaging of congenital abnormalities of the inner ear and internal auditory canal. Eur J Radiol 2001; 40(2):94–104.

21.Casselman JW, O eciers FE, Govaerts PJ, Kuhweide R, Geldof H, Somers TH, D’Hont G. Aplasia and hypoplasia of the vestibulocochlear nerve: Diagnosis with MR Imaging. Radiology 1997; 202:773–781.

22.Casselman JW, Kuhweide R, Deemling M, Ampe W, Dehaene I, Meeus L. Constructive interference in steady state-3DFT MR imaging of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle. Am J Neuroradiol 1993; 14:47–57.

23.Mets MB, Young NM, Pass A, Lasky JB. Early diagnosis of Usher syndrome in children. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2000; 98:237–242.

3

Classification and Epidemiology

Alessandro Martini and Patrizia Trevisi

Ferrara University, Ferrara, Italy

I.CLASSIFICATION

The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) defined hearing loss (HL) as the di erence from the normal ability to detect sounds relative to its established standards.

Hearing impairment is usually classified by site of lesions into two main groups, conductive and sensorineural. More specific definitions of damage localization along the auditory pathway, according to a better diagnostic evaluation, provide a more detailed subdivision of the impairments. The ‘‘sensorineural’’ term is related to disease or deformity of the inner ear/ cochlear nerve with an air-bone gap < 15 dB; ‘‘neural’’ refers to pathology of the cochlear nerve; ‘‘sensory’’ means a cochlear disease or deformity. A combined involvement of the outer/middle ears and the inner ear, characterized by >20 dB HL in the bone conduction and associated with >15 dB air-bone gap, is defined as ‘‘mixed’’ impairment. A ‘‘central’’ impairment is due to a disease localized in the central nervous system above the cochlear nerve. This classification appears to be useful in clinical practice. However, a nosological point of view does not fully respect the impact of hearing impairment on individual participation in social life and on quality of life, when health intervention must be planned.

For this reason, several epidemiological studies refer to ‘‘permanent’’ hearing impairment in the better ear and for frequencies ranging from 0.5 to 4 KHz, which are essential for understanding speech. The World Health Organisation (WHO) considers losses of 41 dB or greater in the better ear, for adults, and 31 dB, for children, as disabling impairments.

49

50

Martini and Trevisi

From a rehabilitative point of view, classifications based on period of acoustic deprivation (permanent/transient), grade of impairment, and age of onset of hearing loss (prenatal, perinatal, postnatal) are adopted.

Grades of hearing impairment (ANSI)

Mild, 15–30 dB HL

Moderate, 31–60

Severe, 61–89

Profound, 90 or greater

Grades of hearing impairment (WHO)

No impairment, 25 dB or better

Slight, 26–40 dB

Moderate, 41–60 dB

Severe, 61–80 dB

Profound, 81 dB or greater

Grades of hearing impairment (EU)

Mild, over 20 and less than 40 dB

Moderate, over 40 and less than 70 dB

Severe, over 70 and less than 95 dB

Profound, equal to and over 95 dB

Permanent childhood hearing impairments (PCHI) are traditionally classified according to etiology as congenital or acquired (Table 1). Congenital hearing impairment is present at birth, owing to exogenous factors or endogenous-genetic factors, while acquired loss occurs after birth. Based on age of onset and developmental conditions present at the time of hearing deterioration, hearing impairment is classified as pre-, peri-, or postnatal and pre-, peri-, or postverbal.

Global phenotypic expression of the causative factors of hearing loss may involve di erent systems and organs, with association of signs in recognizable syndromes. Syndromic hearing impairment and isolated nonsyndromic hearing impairment are defined. Many syndromes are caused by single gene defects and therefore can be inherited; others, such as Goldenhar’s syndrome, are due to exogenous agents and are not hereditable. On the other hand, a hereditary syndrome that includes hearing loss does not necessarily show the defect, owing to the variability of gene expression, but it can be hereditable.

Some misunderstandings between definitions of audiological terms and subdivisions of etiologies still occur. Concerning prenatal causes, ‘‘congenital’’ and ‘‘hereditary’’ mean di erent conditions. Causes a ecting pregnancy, due to exogenous agents, such as rubella, are congenital, not hereditary. Cytomegalovirus infections occur in pregnancy and can cause a delayed hearing damage, defined as progressive hearing loss. In the same

Classification and Epidemiology

51

Table 1 Classification of Hearing Impairment by Etiology

 

 

 

 

Congenital (prenatal)

 

 

Nongenetic

Infections (toxoplasmosis, cytomegalovirus,

 

 

rubella, AIDS, HSV)

 

 

Ototoxic drugs

 

 

Metabolic disorders

 

Genetic

Syndromicic

 

 

Non syndromic

 

Acquired

 

 

Perinatal

Hypoxia

 

 

Hyperbilirubinemia

 

 

Infections

 

 

Prematurity, low weight

 

Postnatal

Meningitis

 

 

Otitis media

 

 

Viral infections (parotitidis, measles, CMV)

 

 

Noise exposure

 

 

Trauma

 

Genetic delayed

Progressive hereditary

 

 

 

 

way, some of the most common types of hereditary hearing impairment are progressive, not present at birth.

II.EPIDEMIOLOGY

A.Prevalence

Prevalence is defined as the total number of subjects with a specific condition in a given population at a specific time. The number of individuals a ected by hearing impairment is calculated from population-based national surveys. These data are essential in planning programs for prevention and management of hearing loss. Based on the WHO classification, disabling hearing impairment in children under 15 years of age is defined as a permanent hearing threshold level for the better ear of 31 dB or greater, averaged for the four frequencies 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz. Above this grade of impairment, the WHO recommends hearing aids to preserve communication skills and social integration of these patients. Moreover, a standard classification and an epidemiologically valid methodology are needed to compare data between di erent countries and to describe the proportion of causes.

52

Martini and Trevisi

In 1995, WHO estimated at least 120 million of hearing impaired people worldwide, with a global prevalence of 2.1%. More than a half of these people were from developing countries.

In a European Economic Community (EEC) study of 1969 cohorts, prevalence estimates for hearing impairment z 50 dB in the better ear of 0.9/1000 were found (see Table 2) (1,5,7,8,11–18). In recent studies, the prevalence estimates vary from 0.5 to 4.2/1000 in European countries (2–4).

In Estonia, the estimated prevalence (5) of permanent childhood hearing impairment z 40 dB BEHL, birth cohort 1985–1990, was calculated as 172 per 100.000 live births. Concerning the prevalence of profound hearing impairment (4), the overall prevalence was 0.41/1000 and 0.45/ 1000 live births in Wales and in Denmark, respectively, in the same birth cohort (1975–1980). The proportion of inherited hearing loss is 47–50% in the two countries. A prevalence rate of severe to profound PCHI in 0.24/1000 live birth was found in the Trent region (6).

According to a universal neonatal hearing screening in the United Kingdom, prevalence is 1/1000 live births and increases until the age of 9 years (7); after birth, 50–90% more children are unpredictably diagnosed in the following 10 years. Parving found a prevalence estimate of 1–1.5/1000 live births. The increase in the estimated prevalence of hearing impairment in childhood, reaching at least 3.6–8.2/1000 of live births at 5–9 years of age, was observed (8).

According to a large population study from Great Britain (9), the prevalence of hearing impairments in the adult population is 18% and increases as a function of age, in particular over 70 years. The tendency of the proportion of the elderly to increase in the future has been well known in developed countries (10). Projections of recent studies, in Finnish and English populations, suggest that the number of all hearing-impaired people is expected to increase (9) in the developed countries.

1.Prevalence of Hearing Impairment in Specific Subgroups

The global prevalence of PCHI is low in developed countries; however, in specific subgroups of children, higher prevalence estimates than those reported for the overall population are found (Table 3).

A high prevalence of hearing impairment was found in neonatal intensive care units (NICU). In these studies (9,19,20), hearing impairment was reported to be 20–100 times greater than in the well-baby population. A wide variability between studies was observed, probably depending on di erent criteria for access to special care units and on the combination of di erent risk factors.

Particular syndromes with craniofacial malformations, such as Down syndrome, are characterized by inner or middle ear anomalies. In these

Table 2 Prevalence of Hearing Impairment (1,5,7,8,11–18)

Author

Prevalence/1000

Cohorts

Population

Grade dB

Country

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed countries

 

 

 

z50

 

Martin, 1981

0.9

1969

Children

EEC

Maki Torkko, 1998

1.2

1973–1982

 

z40

 

 

 

1983–1992

 

z40

 

Parving, 1999 (8)

1–1.5

 

Newborns

 

 

3.6–8.2

 

5–9 years

z40

 

Uus, 2000 (5)

1.72

1985–1990

 

Estonia

 

0.15 (congenital)

 

 

 

 

Streppel, 2000 (12)

0.43

 

School-aged

z25

Germany

Dalzell, 2000

2.0

 

Newborns

NY State, U.S.A.

Neckham, 2001

1.27

1980–1994

Newborns

Moderate

Tyrol

Fortnum, 2001 (7)

0.91

1980–1995

3 years

z40

UK

 

1.65

 

9–16 years

 

 

Developing countries

 

 

 

 

 

Liu, 2001 (13)

0.67

 

<15 years

 

China

 

12.8

 

60 years

 

 

Prasansuk, (14)

3.5

1988–2000

Children

z50

Thailand

Hadjikakou, 2000 (15)

1.19 congenital

1979–1996

 

Cyprus

 

0.4 acquired

 

 

z31

 

Elahi, 1998 (16)

7.9

 

5–15 years

Pakistan

 

 

 

 

 

 

Epidemiology and Classification

53