- •English Lexicology
- •Preface
- •Organization and Content
- •Contents
- •Part I: Introduction
- •1.2 Methods and Procedures of Lexicological Analysis
- •Part II: The Structure of the English Lexicon
- •2.1 Words and Their Associative Fields
- •2.2 Word Families
- •2.3 Word Classes
- •2.4 Semantic, or Lexical, Fields
- •3.1 Synchronic Approach to the Structure of the English Vocabulary
- •3.1.1 Common, Literary, and Colloquial layers
- •3.1.2 Neologisms
- •3.2 Diachronic Approach: Etymological Survey of the English Word-Stock
- •3.2.1 Definition of Etymology
- •3.2.2 English Lexemes of Native Origin
- •3.2.3 Borrowed, or Loan, Lexemes
- •3.2.4 Classification of Borrowings according to the Degree of Assimilation
- •3.2.5 Etymological Doublets and Triplets
- •3.2.6 Folk Etymology
- •Part IV: The Word
- •4.1 Defining a Word
- •4.2 Morphological Structure of Words
- •4.2.1 Free and Bound Morphemes
- •4.2.2 Roots and Affixes
- •4.2.3 Stems
- •4.2.4 Types of affixes
- •4.2.5 Derivational and Functional Affixes
- •Inflection of Derived or Compound Words
- •4.2.6 Cliticization
- •4.2.7 Internal Change/Alternation
- •4.2.8 Suppletion
- •4.2.9 Reduplication
- •Part V: Word-Formation
- •5.1 Derivation/Affixation
- •5.1.1 Types of Derivational Affixes
- •5.2 Stress and Tone Placement
- •5.3 Compounding
- •5.3.1 Classification of Compounds
- •5.3.2 Endocentric and Exocentric Compounds
- •5.4 Reduplication
- •5.5 Conversion
- •5.6 Blend(ing)
- •5.7 Eponyms
- •5.8 Backformation
- •5.9 Clipping
- •5.10 Acronyms and Abbreviations
- •Part VI: Semantics
- •6.1 Types of Semantics
- •6.2 Word-Meaning
- •6.3 Types of Meaning
- •6.3.1 Grammatical Meaning
- •6.3.2 Lexical Meaning
- •6.3.3 Denotative Meaning
- •6.3.4 Connotative Meaning
- •6.3.5 Differential Meaning
- •6.3 6 Distributional Meaning
- •6.4 Phonetic, Morphological, and Semantic Motivation of Words
- •6.5 Semantics and Change of Meaning
- •7.1 Similarity of Sense
- •7.2 Oppositeness of Sense
- •7.3 Sense Categories: Hyponymy
- •7.4 Sense Categories: Meronymy
- •7.5 Related Senses
- •7.6 Unrelated Senses: Homonymy
- •7.7 Semantic Deviance
- •Part VIII: Word Groups and Phraseological Units
- •8.1 Basic Features of Word-groups
- •8.2 Phraseology
- •8.3 Definition of a Phraseological Unit
- •8.4 The Criteria of Phraseological Units
- •8.5 Classification of phraseologisms
- •8.6 The Origin of Phraseological Units
- •8.6.1 Native Phraseological Units
- •8.6.2 Borrowed Phraseological Units
- •8.7 Semantic Structure of Phraseological Units
- •8.8 Phraseological Meaning
- •8.9 Semantic Relations of Phraseological Units
- •8.9.1 Similarity of Sense
- •8.9.2 Oppositeness of Sense
- •9.1 Differences in Vocabulary between American and British English
- •9.2 Spelling Differences between American and British English
- •7.3 Grammatical Differences between American and British English
- •Part X: Lexicography
- •10.1 Main Types of Dictionaries
- •10.1.1 Non-linguistic Dictionaries: Encyclopaedias
- •10.1.2 Linguistic Dictionaries
- •Imitation
- •Glossary
7.2 Oppositeness of Sense
The second semantic relation is antonymy, which is the sense relation that exists between lexemes fundamentally opposite in meaning. Brown defines antonymy as “a relation in which two lexemes share all relevant properties except for one that causes them to be incompatible” (p.26), which is polarity of meanings. The lexemes freedom and book cannot be compared because they do not share a common semantic ground on which they are contrasted. However, antonyms may realize their relation in the context where items share a common ground or if they hold the same sense. This feature depends on the context and situation; for example, in discussing colors, dull and bright are antonymous, but if dull characterizes a person, then the antonym of dull is sharp or bright. If dull is used in reference to blades or knives, then the antonym of dull is sharp.
There are several ways where lexemes can be opposites. One of them is complementary, or contradictory, pairs. Complementary antonyms are the ones, whose “senses completely bisect some domain” (Brown, p.26). Complementary antonyms do not have a middle ground; they are absolute opposites. There may exist only two possibilities—either one or the other. “The items complement each other in their meaning, and thus are known as complementary antonyms” (Crystal, p. 165). The examples of complementary antonyms are man—woman, girl—boy, married—single, dead—alive, win—lose, exit -- entrance, sink -- float, true -- false, pass -- fail, legal—illegal, and others.
The second group of antonyms is called gradable, or polar, antonyms, which include “the concept of scale between two endpoints” (Tserdanelis & Wong, p. 225). If two antonyms are opposite in meaning, and at the same time there can be seen endpoints of some scale (temperature, height, size, age, and others), then they are gradable antonyms. Gradable antonyms have a middle ground. The examples of gradable antonyms include toward – away, hot—cold, good—bad, slow—fast, rapid—slow, and others. One solution to gradable antonyms is to treat the items as polysemous, “having relative and absolute senses in contrary and complementary relations, respectively (Brown, p.26), e.g., hot—warm—cold.
The third group of antonyms is based on the oppositeness, where one item presupposes the other, and this oppositeness is called converseness. Some scholars name these types of antonyms relational (Denham & Lobeck, 2010, p. 296; Tserdanelis & Wong, 2004, p.225). Some examples of these antonyms are husband—wife, buy—sell, above –below, over—under, parent-child, teacher—student, doctor—patient, friend—enemy, lawyer—client, day—night, begin—end, and others. There cannot be a husband without a wife or a doctor without a patient, and there cannot be a parent without a child. Converseness presupposes that each antonym describes the same relation or activity from a different side. Reverses are relations between terms describing movement, where one term describes movement in one direction and the other,the same movement, in the opposite direction.
All languages have antonyms, and antonyms share the same types of relation.