- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •Foreword
- •Introduction
- •Cognitive therapy with in-patients
- •Why do cognitive therapy with in-patients?
- •Specific problems relating to cognitive therapy with in-patients
- •Case example (Anne)
- •Short case history and presentation
- •Assessment of suitability for cognitive therapy
- •Beginning of cognitive formulation of case
- •Session 2 (continuation of assessment for suitability for cognitive therapy)
- •Progress of therapy
- •Session 3
- •Session 4 (three days later)
- •Session 5 (next day—half an hour)
- •Session 6 (next day)
- •Sessions 7–26
- •Outcome
- •Ratings
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Cognitive treatment of panic disorder and agoraphobia: a brief synopsis
- •A many layered fear of internal experience: the case of John
- •Second session
- •Tenth session
- •Postscript
- •References
- •Introduction
- •The behavioural model
- •Cognitive hypotheses of obsessive-compulsive disorder
- •The cognitive hypothesis of the development of obsessional disorders
- •The role of cognitive and behavioural factors in the maintenance of obsessional disorders
- •Applications of the cognitive model
- •General style of treatment
- •Assessment factors
- •Problems encountered in implementing assessment
- •Content
- •Effects of discussion
- •More specific concerns
- •Embarrassment
- •Chronicity
- •Broadening the cognitive focus of assessment
- •Treatment
- •Engagement and ensuring compliance
- •Further enhancing exposure treatments
- •Dealing with negative automatic thoughts
- •Dealing with concurrent depression
- •Dealing with obsessions not accompanied by compulsive behaviour
- •Relapse prevention
- •Conclusions
- •Acknowledgements
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Cognitive-behavioural hypothesis
- •Increased physiological arousal
- •Focus of attention
- •Avoidant behaviours
- •The importance of reassurance
- •Principles of cognitive treatment of hypochondriasis
- •Case 1
- •Treatment strategies and reattribution
- •Alternative hypotheses
- •Case 2
- •Cognitive-behavioural intervention
- •Case 3
- •Conclusions
- •Notes
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Prevalence of psychological problems in cancer patients
- •Why use cognitive behaviour therapy?
- •Specific issues in applying cognitive behaviour therapy to cancer patients
- •Grieving for the ‘lost self’
- •Locus of control
- •Physical status
- •Pain
- •Treatment issues
- •Longstanding deficits in coping strategies
- •Specific problems in applying cognitive behaviour therapy in cancer patients
- •Case study
- •Sessions 1 and 2
- •Session 3
- •Session 4
- •Sessions 5 to 7
- •Session 8
- •Sessions 9 and 10
- •Outcome
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Case history
- •Medical assessment
- •Psychological assessment
- •Treatment plan
- •Developing motivation for treatment
- •Rationale for treatment
- •Providing information and education
- •Weight restoration
- •Eating behaviour
- •Binge eating
- •Vomiting and laxative abuse
- •Identifying dysfunctional thoughts
- •Dealing with dysfunctional thoughts
- •Dealing with other areas of concern
- •Maintenance and follow-up
- •Being a therapist with anorexic and bulimic patients
- •References
- •Treatment of drug abuse
- •Drug withdrawal
- •General treatment measures
- •Cognitive models of drug abuse
- •A scheme for cognitive behaviour therapy with drug abusers
- •Engaging the patient
- •Establishing a therapeutic relationship
- •Motivation
- •Rationale
- •The role of negative cognitions in the process of engagement and commitment
- •Cue analysis
- •Problem solving and cue modification
- •Modifying situational factors
- •Cue exposure and aversion
- •Predicting and avoiding high-risk situations
- •Coping with high-risk situations
- •Modifying emotional factors
- •Underlying assumptions
- •Self-schemas in addiction
- •Modifying cognitive structures
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Other clinical approaches with the offender
- •Problems of working with offenders
- •Cognitive-behavioural techniques with offenders
- •General strategies
- •Explaining the role of cognitions
- •Developing trust
- •Collaboration
- •Common cognitive patterns in interaction with offenders
- •Self-defeat
- •Levels of involvement
- •Analysis of the offence
- •Assessing change; deciding on the need for therapy
- •Cognitive therapy
- •Case example
- •Presentation
- •Sessions one to three
- •Background
- •Exposure history
- •Analysis
- •The treatment decision
- •Session four
- •The issue of control
- •The issue of deterrents
- •Explaining the role of cognitions
- •The self-help task
- •Session five
- •Session six
- •Re-analysis
- •Session seven
- •Dependency
- •The issues of wanting to expose and pleasure
- •The issue of dissatisfactions
- •Session eight
- •Session nine
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Suicidal thoughts during therapy for depression
- •Secondary prevention immediately following deliberate self-harm
- •Outline for therapy
- •Vigilance for suicidal expression
- •Case transcripts
- •Reasons for living and reasons for dying
- •Evaluating negative thoughts within a session
- •Inability to imagine the future
- •Some common problems
- •Concluding remarks
- •References
- •Emergent themes
- •Cross-sectional and longitudinal assessment
- •Engagement in and explanation of cognitive therapy
- •Techniques for eliciting thoughts and feelings within the session
- •Dealing with dysfunctional attitudes
- •Other applications of cognitive therapy
- •Application of cognitive therapy to clients with a learning difficulty
- •Case 1
- •Case 2
- •Case 3: Cognitive Restructuring
- •The cognitive framework
- •Different cognitive levels
- •Implications of a ‘levels’ model for therapy methods
- •Theoretical cogency of a ‘levels’ model
- •Future Research
- •Basic research on cognitive processes
- •Future strategies for clinical research
- •Note
- •References
- •Index
Chapter seven
Drug abusers
Stirling Moorey
Over the last 10 years the role of cognitive factors in addiction has been viewed with increasing interest. The old-style disease model, which saw addicts as suffering from an illness which limited their control of their own actions, is being replaced by a self-control model, which emphasises individuals’ contribution through their thoughts and actions to their dependence on drugs. One of the features of this theoretical approach is its concern with the factors which various addictions have in common, i.e. the deficits in self-control which can be seen in such widely divergent areas as alcoholism, smoking, and heroin addiction (Levison et al. 1983). This chapter will mainly focus on illicit drugs rather than on the physically more damaging but socially condoned drugs such as alcohol and nicotine. Before pursuing the cognitive model of drug abuse further we will look at the conventional forms of treatment.
Treatment of drug abuse
Most workers in the field of addictions would see the problem as multifactorial in its aetiology. Psychological, social, and physiological factors all play a part in producing physical or psychic dependence on a drug. The approach to treatment is similarly eclectic, as far as resources allow, making use of the divergent skills of various disciplines. The modern drug dependence team consists of psychiatrist, nurses, social workers, and psychologists and has more and more a communityoriented approach with good links with local voluntary and self-help organisations.
The treatment of drug dependence falls into two phases: drug withdrawal and general treatment measures.
Drug withdrawal
The aim of all treatment of addicts is to free them from dependence on the drug. Some doctors advocate a period of maintenance on the drug before detoxification. In practice this usually applies only to opiates. The argument for this is that many addicts, particularly polydrug abusers, have an unstable, chaotic life-style, and if they are to overcome their addiction they need to be in as stable a condition as possible. Though plausible, there is little evidence to support this stance. Most doctors would suggest an immediate period of detoxification as an out-patient or in-patient. Before commencing withdrawal an assessment would be carried out over a number of sessions. A psychiatric and drug history is taken, together with details of the extent of present drug use. Physical examination may reveal withdrawal signs or signs of side-effects of drug abuse. If the person is dependent on opiates, three positive urine tests over a period of ten to fourteen days are usually needed to confirm dependence (Gardner and Connell 1970). Methods of detoxification vary depending on the drug used. The basic principle is to replace the drug with another which either has the same effects (e.g. methadone in heroin withdrawal) but can be reduced in a controlled way, or to give a drug which dampens some of the symptoms of withdrawal (e.g. benzodiazepines in alcohol dependence). For more details see Ghodse (1983).
General treatment measures
Getting the addict off the drug is relatively easy. It is prolonging this state of affairs which is difficult. The second phase of treatment will use a variety of measures with the aims of preventing relapse and resocialising the person into a drug-free life-style. The methods used depend on theoretical orientation, the particular problem of the addict, and the resources available. Some units offer a short-term detoxification followed by out-patient treatment with support groups. Others attempt a more radical change and advocate a long admission, often along therapeutic community lines, with the goal of helping the patient to learn more appropriate and mature ways of relating. Social work input to help with accommodation, training for and obtaining jobs, or helping with family problems is frequently used. Psychotherapy is rarely available, though in-patient or out-patient groups run along psychotherapeutic lines are more common. Many of these interventions are influenced by the old disease model, although this influence will not always be acknowledged. Residential treatment centres encourage avoidance of people and
