
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •Foreword
- •Introduction
- •Cognitive therapy with in-patients
- •Why do cognitive therapy with in-patients?
- •Specific problems relating to cognitive therapy with in-patients
- •Case example (Anne)
- •Short case history and presentation
- •Assessment of suitability for cognitive therapy
- •Beginning of cognitive formulation of case
- •Session 2 (continuation of assessment for suitability for cognitive therapy)
- •Progress of therapy
- •Session 3
- •Session 4 (three days later)
- •Session 5 (next day—half an hour)
- •Session 6 (next day)
- •Sessions 7–26
- •Outcome
- •Ratings
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Cognitive treatment of panic disorder and agoraphobia: a brief synopsis
- •A many layered fear of internal experience: the case of John
- •Second session
- •Tenth session
- •Postscript
- •References
- •Introduction
- •The behavioural model
- •Cognitive hypotheses of obsessive-compulsive disorder
- •The cognitive hypothesis of the development of obsessional disorders
- •The role of cognitive and behavioural factors in the maintenance of obsessional disorders
- •Applications of the cognitive model
- •General style of treatment
- •Assessment factors
- •Problems encountered in implementing assessment
- •Content
- •Effects of discussion
- •More specific concerns
- •Embarrassment
- •Chronicity
- •Broadening the cognitive focus of assessment
- •Treatment
- •Engagement and ensuring compliance
- •Further enhancing exposure treatments
- •Dealing with negative automatic thoughts
- •Dealing with concurrent depression
- •Dealing with obsessions not accompanied by compulsive behaviour
- •Relapse prevention
- •Conclusions
- •Acknowledgements
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Cognitive-behavioural hypothesis
- •Increased physiological arousal
- •Focus of attention
- •Avoidant behaviours
- •The importance of reassurance
- •Principles of cognitive treatment of hypochondriasis
- •Case 1
- •Treatment strategies and reattribution
- •Alternative hypotheses
- •Case 2
- •Cognitive-behavioural intervention
- •Case 3
- •Conclusions
- •Notes
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Prevalence of psychological problems in cancer patients
- •Why use cognitive behaviour therapy?
- •Specific issues in applying cognitive behaviour therapy to cancer patients
- •Grieving for the ‘lost self’
- •Locus of control
- •Physical status
- •Pain
- •Treatment issues
- •Longstanding deficits in coping strategies
- •Specific problems in applying cognitive behaviour therapy in cancer patients
- •Case study
- •Sessions 1 and 2
- •Session 3
- •Session 4
- •Sessions 5 to 7
- •Session 8
- •Sessions 9 and 10
- •Outcome
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Case history
- •Medical assessment
- •Psychological assessment
- •Treatment plan
- •Developing motivation for treatment
- •Rationale for treatment
- •Providing information and education
- •Weight restoration
- •Eating behaviour
- •Binge eating
- •Vomiting and laxative abuse
- •Identifying dysfunctional thoughts
- •Dealing with dysfunctional thoughts
- •Dealing with other areas of concern
- •Maintenance and follow-up
- •Being a therapist with anorexic and bulimic patients
- •References
- •Treatment of drug abuse
- •Drug withdrawal
- •General treatment measures
- •Cognitive models of drug abuse
- •A scheme for cognitive behaviour therapy with drug abusers
- •Engaging the patient
- •Establishing a therapeutic relationship
- •Motivation
- •Rationale
- •The role of negative cognitions in the process of engagement and commitment
- •Cue analysis
- •Problem solving and cue modification
- •Modifying situational factors
- •Cue exposure and aversion
- •Predicting and avoiding high-risk situations
- •Coping with high-risk situations
- •Modifying emotional factors
- •Underlying assumptions
- •Self-schemas in addiction
- •Modifying cognitive structures
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Other clinical approaches with the offender
- •Problems of working with offenders
- •Cognitive-behavioural techniques with offenders
- •General strategies
- •Explaining the role of cognitions
- •Developing trust
- •Collaboration
- •Common cognitive patterns in interaction with offenders
- •Self-defeat
- •Levels of involvement
- •Analysis of the offence
- •Assessing change; deciding on the need for therapy
- •Cognitive therapy
- •Case example
- •Presentation
- •Sessions one to three
- •Background
- •Exposure history
- •Analysis
- •The treatment decision
- •Session four
- •The issue of control
- •The issue of deterrents
- •Explaining the role of cognitions
- •The self-help task
- •Session five
- •Session six
- •Re-analysis
- •Session seven
- •Dependency
- •The issues of wanting to expose and pleasure
- •The issue of dissatisfactions
- •Session eight
- •Session nine
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Suicidal thoughts during therapy for depression
- •Secondary prevention immediately following deliberate self-harm
- •Outline for therapy
- •Vigilance for suicidal expression
- •Case transcripts
- •Reasons for living and reasons for dying
- •Evaluating negative thoughts within a session
- •Inability to imagine the future
- •Some common problems
- •Concluding remarks
- •References
- •Emergent themes
- •Cross-sectional and longitudinal assessment
- •Engagement in and explanation of cognitive therapy
- •Techniques for eliciting thoughts and feelings within the session
- •Dealing with dysfunctional attitudes
- •Other applications of cognitive therapy
- •Application of cognitive therapy to clients with a learning difficulty
- •Case 1
- •Case 2
- •Case 3: Cognitive Restructuring
- •The cognitive framework
- •Different cognitive levels
- •Implications of a ‘levels’ model for therapy methods
- •Theoretical cogency of a ‘levels’ model
- •Future Research
- •Basic research on cognitive processes
- •Future strategies for clinical research
- •Note
- •References
- •Index
CANCER PATIENTS 61
within the classic CBT framework. Sobel and Worden (1980) focused on problem-solving skills, whilst Gordon et al. (1980) utilised a programme of supportive therapy with education and information giving and environmental manipulation. This aimed to give patients a more realistic outlook, increase their daily activities, and improve their adjustment to the disorder.
Specific issues in applying cognitive behaviour therapy to cancer patients
The following section refers to specifie issues that may need to be tackled in a course of CBT with a cancer patient who is suffering from psychological problems. It is obvious that some of these difficulties may also be experienced by patients with other physical illnesses.
Grieving for the ‘lost self’
One of the major problems confronting the patient will be the effect of the illness on their self-esteem and self-image. The role of the individual in the family and work situation may change significantly. Self-esteem will be affected by loss or changes in role. Cancer sufferers often feel stigmatised by colleagues and friends. Those close to them often feel uncomfortable in the patient’s company, not knowing if they are or are not allowed to discuss the illness.
The disfigurement brought about by surgery can have a tremendous effect on the individual’s self-image. Many women report sexual difficulties following mastectomy related to their anxieties about their body image (Morris 1979). These difficulties are often compounded by a sense of personal failure and self-blame that the individual has developed cancer in the first instance.
In many ways the patient’s view of themselves is tackled in the same way as it would be in CBT in general (e.g. see Beck et al. 1979; Williams 1984). In addition the following points should be remembered:
1.With the physically ill, subjective perceptions of personal worth and degree of handicap may be distorted, but in tackling these issues there is also a need for a realistic appraisal of the patient’s role and help is needed in adjusting to actual changes that may be required.
2.It is often important to involve the spouse in discussions about self-image in patients who have undergone disfiguring surgery.
3.Role-plays can be used to enable the patient to take the lead in interactions with friends and colleagues. This allows the patient to take control of discussions about the illness and its treatment.
Locus of control
Patients frequently feel hopeless because of the overwhelming sense of lack of personal control over their illness and prognosis. This sense of powerlessness is very demoralising. At some point a sensitive exploration of the patient’s fears about coping with death is necessary. The patient can be helped in several ways:
1.An acknowledgement that the future is uncertain, accompanied by the provision of clear information about what is and is not known about their particular illness.
2.According to Gomez (1987), most patients’ fantasies about their death include images of ‘disastrous dyscontrol’ and an agonising, often painful and lonely end. It is important to take on these anxieties and to talk in detail about all aspects of concern. Additional meetings can be organised with the clinicians to discuss pain control, etc.
3.Avoiding overgeneralisation of feelings of lack of control by getting the patient to define those aspects of life that they are in control of and those which no one can control.
4.Helping the patient overcome any guilt or anger they feel about their lack of control.
Physical status
There may be realistic limitations placed on the patient because of physical disability or side-effects of treatment. This needs to be taken into account when planning activity schedules by:
1.planning activities that require less exertion or mobility;
2.using activities that enhance residual abilities rather than expose deficits;
3.putting limitations on what the patient is allowed to tackle at a given time, e.g. in the initial time after radiotherapy (which can be particularly tiring) only allowing the individual to choose from a specific number of activities that have been preselected as feasible for someone in that physical state.