task
.docxPractical tasks
The Subject of Theoretical Grammar
Points for discussion:
-
What is grammar?
-
What is the difference between theoretical and practical grammar?
-
What is the aim of theoretical grammar?
-
How is grammar connected with other disciplines?
-
The subject of theoretical grammar.
-
Syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations. Give your own examples.
-
What language levels are identified in the language system?
-
What is the difference between segmental and suprasegmental units?
-
What functions do the language units perform?
Exercises
Exercise 1. Use the frame of the hierarchy of units and analyze the following sentences.
Discourse
(sentence)
Clause
Phrase
Word
phoneme/grapheme
-
You kind of have to nail him to the wall.
-
I have inevitably covered a great deal of familiar ground.
-
You are easy to cook for.
-
It is perhaps more likely that they were associated with locomotion from the beginning.
-
If you really think so, it’s meaningless.
Recommended Literature
-
Иванова И.П., Бурлакова В.В., Почепцов Г.Г. Грамматика современного английского языка. – М., 1981.
-
Bloh M.Y. A Course in Theoretical English Grammar – Moscow, 2000.
-
Ilyish B.A. The Structure of Modern English. – Moscow. – Leningrad, 1971.
Morphemic structure of the word. Categorial structure of the word
Points for discussion 1
-
What is the correlation between notional and functional words?
-
What is the basic difference between the morpheme and the word as language units?
-
What is a morph?
-
What is a morpheme?
-
What does the difference between a morpheme and an allomorph consist in?
-
What principles underlie the traditional study of the morphemic composition of the word?
-
What principles is the distributional analysis of morphemes based on?
-
With what meaning of morpheme are we concerned in grammar?
-
Give the definitions of “suffix”, “inflection” , “ending”.
-
What types of word-form derivation do you know?
Exercises:
Exercise I. State the morphological composition of the following words.
Snow, sandstone, impossibility, widower, opinion, exclamation, passer-by, misunderstanding, inactivity, snowball, kingdom, mother–of-pearl, population, pretty, bushy, homeless, thoughtful, improbable, shaky, deep-blue, illegible, courageous, to worry, to forbid, to retell, to retire, to do away, to befriend, to disobey
Exercise II. State the meaning of the affix.
Un-, in-, dis-, non-, re-, mis-, en-, de-, over-, under-, pre-, post-, anti-, counter-, co-, inter-, ex-, sub-, super-, trans-, ultra-, -er, -or, -ist, -ian, -ee
Exercise III. Do the morphemic analysis of the words on the lines of the traditional and distributional classifications.
MODEL: Do the morphemic analysis of the word “inseparable”.
On the lines of the traditional classification the word “inseparable” is treated as a three-morpheme word consisting of the root “-separ-”, the prefix “in-” and the lexical suffix “-able”.
On the lines of distributional analysis the root “-separ-” is a bound, overt, continuous, additive morpheme; the prefix “in-” is bound, overt, continuous, additive; the suffix “-able” is bound, overt, continuous, additive.
quiet, perceptions, unmistakable, bell, unbelievably, glassy, inexplicable, semidarkness, sing – sang- singing – singer, disfigured, underspecified, outlandish.
Exercise IV. Group the words according to a particular type of morphemic distribution.
MODEL: worked – bells – tells – telling – spells – spelled – spelt – felled – bell
Spells – spelled: the allomorphs “-s” and “-ed” are in contrastive distribution (=fells - felled);
Bell – bells: the allomorph “-s” and the zero allomorph are in contrastive distribution
Spelt – spelled: allomorphs “-t” and “-ed” are in non-contrastive distribution;
Worked – spelled: the allomorphs “-ed” [t] and “-ed” [d] are in complementary distribution.
-
burning – burns – burned – burnt;
-
dig – digs – digging – digged – dug – digger
-
light – lit – lighted – lighting – lighter
-
worked – working – worker – workable – workaholic.
Recommended Literature
1.Иванова И.П., Бурлакова В.В., Почепцов Г.Г. Грамматика современного английского языка. – М., 1981.
2.Bloh M.Y. A Course in Theoretical English Grammar – Moscow, 2000.
3.Ilyish B.A. The Structure of Modern English. – Moscow. – Leningrad, 1971.
4. Хлебникова И.Б. Оппозиции в морфологии. – М., 1969