Chris_Mi_handout
.pdf
Go to the moon !
39
Approximate Rating of Powertrain
•To determine the forces needed for a 3000lb vehicle to accelerates at 10mph/second; assume aerodynamic, rolling and hillclimbing force counts extra 10% of the forces needed
Force = 1.1*mass*acceleration
=1.1*3000lb*10mph/second*5280ft/3600second
=48400 lbm =1503 lbf
Force = 1.1*mass*acceleration
=1.1*3000lb/2.2*10mph/s*1609/3600second
=6704 N
40
20
Rating of Powertrain
•Determine the average power needed to accelerate the vehicle from zero speed to 60mph
energy = mass*V*V / 2
=3000lb/2.2*[60mph*1609/3600second] 2 / 2
=490318 joules
time = v / a |
v=at |
=[60mph*1609/3600] / [10mph/second*1609/3600]
=[26.8 m/s] / [4.47m/s2]
=6 seconds
Average power = force*distance/seconds = energy / time |
|
|
= 81.7 kW |
(peak power pmax=FV=180kW) |
41 |
|
|
|
Approximate Rating of Powertrain
•Alternatively, determine the forces needed for a 3000lb vehicle to accelerate to 60mph in 10 seconds; assume aerodynamic, rolling and hillclimbing force counts extra 10% of the forces needed, and a constant acceleration
–Final speed V= 60mph*1609/3600=26.8 m/second
–Acceleration a = V / t =26.8 / 10 = 2.68 m/S2
–Force F = m*a = 3000/2.2*2.68 m/S2 = 3657 N
–Power = F V = 3657 * 26.8 = 98 kW (at 60mph speed)
42
21
Rating of Powertrain
•The above assumed a constant acceleration. In real life, the acceleration near 60mph will be greatly reduced. Therefore, the actual power needed to accelerate the vehicle is much less than 90kW
Average power = Final power / 2 = 49 kW
43
Rating of Motor
•Assume the effective tire radius is R
•Torque at wheel is
Tw=FR
Tmotor=Tw / rg
Where rg is gear ratio
• Alternatively, motor torque is
T=P/wm
Where wm is motor angular speed
44
22
Size of Drive Train
•Motor size is determined by
D 2l = 6.1×C108 ABP 1n
Where P is motor input power, in kW, P=Pmax / efficiency A is airgap current density
B is airgap magnetic flux density
C is a constant, between 0.5 and 0.9 n is motor speed in rpm
D is inner diameter of stator or inner diameter of rotor
L is effective length of stator/rotor
45
Size of Motor
•Note that the power required to cruise a vehicle on highway at 60mph is only 6% of the power needed to accelerate the vehicle from 0 to 60mph in 10 seconds.
•Since most motors can be designed to overload for a short time, a motor can be designed at much lower ratings. Example:
–30kW rated power (13.8kW dragging at 60mph, 1/3 rated)
–2 times overload for 60 seconds (60 kW)
–3 times overload for 30 seconds (90 kW)
–4 times overload for 20 seconds (120 kW)
–5 times overload for 10 seconds (150 kW)
46
23
Efficiency
•Note also that a motor can have efficiency (including controller) of over 90%, while an engine only has efficiency less than 30%
•An ICE does not have the overload capability as that of a motor. That’s why the rated power of ICE is usually much higher than required for highway cruising
47
Vehicle Power Plant Characteristics
•Ideal characteristics
•Constant power over all speed ranges
•Constant torque at low speeds to provide high tractive effort where acceleration and hill climbing capability are high
Power |
Torque |
Speed |
48
24
Engine Performance at Full Throttle
•Operating smoothly at idle speed
•Maximum torque is reached at intermediate speed
•Torque declines as speed increases further
•There is a maximum fuel efficiency point in the speed range
P ower (kW)
T orque |
|
l n |
|
fue |
pti |
|
o |
c |
um |
if |
|
i |
|
pec o |
|
|
s |
|
n |
S c |
|
49
Motor Performance at Full Load
•Constant torque below base speed
•Constant power above base speed – field weakening region
•Only single gear or fixed gear is needed in motor transmission
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
Power |
|
300 |
|
Motor power, kW |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
50 |
|
|
|
Torque |
|
250 |
Motor torque, N.m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
||
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
||
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
||
|
10 |
|
|
|
Base |
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
speed |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
1000 |
2000 |
3000 |
4000 |
5000 |
|
Motor rpm
50
25
Tractive Effort of Internal
Combustion Engine
•In order to increase tractive effort, a multi gear transmission is needed in
ICE vehicles
•Manual gear transmission consists of clutch, gear box, final drive, and drive shaft
•Highest gear (smallest ratio): max vehicle speed
•Lowest gear (maximum ratio): maximum tractive effort
|
5 |
|
|
1st gear |
|
|
|
|
|
kN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wheel, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2nd gear |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3rd gear |
|
|
||
effort |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
4th |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
gear |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Tractive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
40 |
60 |
80 |
100 |
120 140 |
160 180 |
200 |
|
|
0 |
||||||||
Vehicle speed, km/h
51
Tractive Effort of EV with Single Gear
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
kN |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wheel, |
5 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
on |
3 |
|
|
|
|
effort |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tractive |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
50 |
100 |
150 |
200 |
|
|
|
Speed, km/h |
|
|
52
26
Continuously Variable Transmissions
(CVT)
•Provide infinite gear ratios
•Virtually matching any engine speed with vehicle speed
53
Vehicle Performance – Speed and
Gradeability of ICEV
•Engine alone
•Gradeability is reduced at higher speed
•Gear provides wider range of speed/gradeability
Tractive effort and resistances, kN
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0 0
1st gear |
|
|
|
||
o |
(57.7%) |
|
Tractive effort |
||
30 |
|
Resistance on |
|||
|
o |
(46.6%) |
|
|
grade |
|
|
|
|
||
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20o (36.4%) |
2nd gear |
|
|
|
|
15o |
|
||
|
|
(26.8%) |
|
||
|
|
10o |
o |
|
|
|
|
(17.6%) |
|
||
|
|
|
|
3rd gear |
|
|
|
|
|
5o (8.7%) |
4th gear |
|
|
0o |
(0%) |
|
|
|
|
|
F |
+ + |
|
|
|
|
|
r F w F g |
|
5 |
100 |
150 |
200 |
||
0 |
|||||
Speed, km/h |
Maximum |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
speed |
|
|
|
54
27
Vehicle Performance – Speed and
Gradeability of EV
•One gear
•More gradeability than ICEV
7 |
|
|
|
Tractive |
|
|
25o |
(46.6%) |
effort |
6 |
|
Resistance on grade |
||
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
20o (36.4%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
15o (26.8%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10o |
(17.6%) |
3 |
|
|
|
5o (8.7%) |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0o (0%) |
1 |
|
|
|
Fr+Fw+Fg |
0 0 |
50 |
|
100 |
150 |
|
|
Speed, km/ |
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
h |
|
|
|
|
speed |
|
55
Driving Cycles
|
100 |
|
|
Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
km/h |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
driving |
|
|
|
|
||
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Speed, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
400 |
600 |
800 |
|
1000 |
1200 |
1400 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
km/h |
50 |
|
|
|
Highway |
|
|
|
|
Speed, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
driving |
|
|
|
|
|
0 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
200 |
300 |
400 |
500 |
600 |
700 |
800 |
|
Driving time, sec.
56
28
|
|
Fuel Economy of ICE |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
• |
ICE has optimum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
operating point for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum engine |
|||
|
best fuel economy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
power |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Ways to increase |
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Optimum |
|
|
2 |
6 |
|
28 |
20 |
|
|
|
|||
|
fuel economy |
|
line |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
include: |
80 |
operation |
* |
|
|
|
5 |
5 |
|
|
00 |
||
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
0 |
|
– |
Optimum vehicle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
design |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
– |
Improving engine |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engin specific fuel |
|
|
efficiency |
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
consumption, g/kWh |
|
– |
Properly matching |
2000 |
3000 |
|
|
|
4000 |
5000 |
|||||
|
0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
transmission |
|
Engine speed, rpm |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– |
Advanced hybrid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
technology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
Braking Performance
•Energy wasted during braking in conventional vehicles
•Can be partially recovered in EV and HEV
•ABS performance can be improved in HEV/EV
•Traction control is easier to achieve in HEV/EV
58
29
