Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Davis W.A.Radio frequency circuit design.2001

.pdf
Скачиваний:
97
Добавлен:
23.08.2013
Размер:
2.47 Mб
Скачать

140

CLASS A AMPLIFIERS

 

 

 

V CC

 

 

V CC

 

+

 

+

 

i ac+ I dc R c

i o

 

I dc RFC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

+

 

 

i c

R L

V o

i c

 

 

 

 

 

(a )

 

 

(b )

i o

+

R L V o

FIGURE 7.12 Class A amplifiers with (a) collector resistor and (b) collector inductor.

I o,max

I o

I Q

FIGURE 7.13 Magnitude of the output current and quiescent current of the class A amplifier.

The quiescent current, IQ, and the output current, Io, is defined in Fig. 7.13. When the load is drawing the maximum instantaneous power,

Io,max D IQ D Idc.

7.84

At this point the maximum output voltage is

 

 

 

Vo,max D Io,maxRL

7.85

and

 

 

 

jVo,maxj D VCC D Io,maxRL

7.86

The dc power source supplies

 

 

 

 

V2

 

Pdc D IdcVCC D

CC

 

7.87

RL

POWER COMBINING OF POWER AMPLIFIERS

141

The maximum average power delivered to the load can now be written in terms of the supply voltage:

P

 

jVo,maxj2

D

VCC2

 

7.88

 

 

 

2RL

 

o D

 

2RL

 

 

If the RF input power is Pi, the power added efficiency is

 

 

0

D

 

Po Pi

 

 

 

7.89

 

 

Pdc

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For high-gain amplifiers, Pi

− Po

 

and

the

maximum efficiency is

0 ³ 21 .

However, it should be noted that many times high-power amplifiers do not have high gain, so the power added efficiency given by Eq. (7.89) offers a more useful quality factor for a transistor than if Pi were neglected.

7.8POWER COMBINING OF POWER AMPLIFIERS

Design of power FET amplifiers requires use of large gate periphery devices. However, eventually, the large the gate periphery causes other problems such as impedance matching especially at RF and microwave frequencies. Bandwidth improvement can be obtained by combining several transistors, often on a single chip. An example of combining two transistors is shown in Fig. 7.14 [7,8]. The separation of the transistors may induce odd-order oscillations in the circuit, even if the stability factor of the individual transistors (even-order stability) indicate they are stable. This odd-order instability can be controlled by adding Rodd between the two drains to damp out such oscillations. This resistor is typically less than 400 $. Symmetry indicates no power dissipation when the outputs of the two transistors are equal and in phase. An example of a four transistor combining circuit is shown in Fig. 7.15, which now includes resistors Rodd1 and Rodd2 to help suppress odd-order oscillations.

R odd

50 Ω

50 Ω

FIGURE 7.14 Power combining two transistors [7,8].

142 CLASS A AMPLIFIERS

R odd1

R odd2

50 Ω

50 Ω

R odd1

FIGURE 7.15 Power combining four transistors [7,8].

PROBLEMS

7.1Using the flow graph reduction method, verify the reflection coefficient found in Eq. (7.17).

7.2The measured scattering parameters of a transistor in an amplifier circuit are found to be the following:

jS11j

6

S11

jS21j

6

S21

jS12j

6

S12

jS22j

6

S22

0.85

32

3.8

145

0.04

74

0.92

15

(a)Determine the stability factor, k, for this transistor.

(b)Determine the y parameters for this circuit.

(c)Determine the circuit that would neutralize (almost unilateralize) the circuit. While this procedure does not guarantee stability in all cases, it always helps lead toward greater stability.

(d)Determine the new scattering parameters for the neutralized circuit.

(e)Determine the generator and load impedances that would give maximum transducer power gain (not unilateral power gain).

(f)What is the value for the maximum transducer power gain.

7.3Determine the transfer function for the flow graph in Fig. 7.16.

7.4A certain transistor has the following S parameters:

S11 D 1.2, S21 D 4.0, S12 D 0, S22 D 0.9

Determine whether this transistor is unconditionally stable.

REFERENCES 143

a

b

c

d

e

f

FIGURE 7.16 Flow graph for Problem 7.3.

REFERENCES

1.H. L. Krauss, C. W. Bostian, and F. H. Raab, Solid State Radio Engineering, New York: Wiley, 1980, pp. 371–382.

2.P. J. Khan, Private communication, 1971.

3.J. M. Rollett, “Stability and Power-Gain Invariants of Linear Twoports,” IRE Trans. Circuit Theory, Vol. CT-9, pp. 29–32, 1962.

4.D. Woods, “Reappraisal of the Unconditional Stability Criteria for Active 2-Port Networks in Terms of S Parameters,” IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems, Vol. CAS-23, pp. 73–81, 1976.

5.T. T. Ha, Solid State Microwave Amplifier Design, New York: Wiley, 1981.

6.S. G. Burns and P. R. Bond, Principles of Electronic Circuits, Boston: PWS Publishing, 1997.

7.R. G. Reitag, S. H. Lee, and D. M. Krafcsik, “Stability and Improved Circuit Modeling Considerations for High Power MMIC Amplifiers,” 1988 IEEE Microwave Theory Tech. Symp. Digest, pp. 175–178, 1988.

8.R. G. Freitag “A Unified Analysis of MMIC Power Amplifier Stability,” 1992 IEEE Microwave Theory Tech. Symp. Digest, pp. 297–300, 1992.

Radio Frequency Circuit Design. W. Alan Davis, Krishna Agarwal

Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Print ISBN 0-471-35052-4 Electronic ISBN 0-471-20068-9

CHAPTER EIGHT

Noise

8.1SOURCES OF NOISE

The dynamic range of a communication transmitter or receiver circuit is usually limited at the high-power point by nonlinearities and at the low-power point by noise. Noise is the random fluctuation of electrical power that interferes with the desired signal. There can be interference with the desired signal by other unwanted deterministic signals, but at this point only the interference caused by random fluctuations will be considered. There are a variety of physical mechanisms that account for noise, but probably the most common is thermal (also referred to as Johnson noise or Nyquist noise). This can be illustrated by simply examining the voltage across an open circuit resistor (Fig. 8.1). The resulting voltage is not zero! The average voltage is zero, but not the instantaneous voltage. At any temperature above absolute 0 K, the Brownian motion of the electrons will produce random instantaneous currents. These currents will produce random instantaneous voltages, and this leads to noise power.

Noise arising in electron tubes, semiconductor diodes, bipolar transistors, or field effect transistors come from a variety of mechanisms. For example, for tubes, these include random times of emission of electrons from a cathode (called shot noise), random electron velocities in the vacuum, nonuniform emission over the surface of the cathode, and secondary emission from the anode. Similarly, for diodes, a random emission of electrons and holes produces noise. In a bipolar transistor, there is in addition partition noise. This represents the fluctuation in the path that charge carriers take between the base and the collector after leaving the emitter. There is in addition 1/f, or flicker noise (where f is frequency), that is caused by surface recombination of base minority carriers at the base-emitter junction [1]. Clearly, as the frequency approaches dc, the flicker noise increases dramatically. As a consequence intermediate amplifier stages are designed to operate well above the frequency where 1/f noise is a significant contributor to the total noise. Typically this frequency ranges from 100 Hz to 10 kHz. In a field effect transistor, there is thermal noise arising from channel resistance, 1/f

144

THERMAL NOISE

145

+

 

 

v(t)

 

 

 

 

 

 

ix

iy

FIGURE 8.1 Voltage across an open circuit resistor.

noise, and a coupling of the channel noise back to the gate where it is of course amplified by the transistor gain. Noise also arises from reverse breakdown in the avalanching of electrons in such devices as Zener diodes and IMPATT diodes. At RF frequencies the two most common noise sources are the thermal noise and the shot noise.

8.2THERMAL NOISE

The random fluctuation of electrons in a resistance would be expected to rise as the temperature increases, since the electron velocities and the number of collisions per second increases. The noise voltage is expressed as an auto correlation of the instantaneous voltage over a time period T:

 

1

T

 

hv2i D Tlim

v2 t dt

8.1

 

2T

!1

 

T

 

The expression for thermal noise voltage has been derived in a variety of ways. Harry Nyquist first solved the problem based on a transmission line model. Other approaches included using a lumped element circuit, the random motion of electrons in a metal conductor, and the radiation from a black body. These are all basically thermodynamic models, and each method resulted in the same expression. The black body method is based on quantum mechanics and therefore provides a solution for noise sources at both cryogenic and room temperatures.

8.2.1Black Body Radiation

Classical mechanics is based on the continuity of energy states. When this theory was applied to calculation of the black body radiation, it was found that the radiation increased without limit. This so-called ultraviolet catastrophe was clearly not physical. However, Max Planck was able to correct the situation by postulating that energy states are not continuous but are quantized in discrete states. These energy values are obtained by solving the Schrodinger¨ equation for the harmonic oscillator. The actual derivation is found in most introductory texts on quantum mechanics [2]:

1

8.2

E D n C hf, n D 0, 1, 2, . . .

2

146 NOISE

In this equation h D 6.547 Ð 10 34 J Ð s is Planck’s constant. If energy were continuous, then the average energy could be obtained from the Boltzmann probability distribution function, P E , by the following integral:

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

D

0

 

EP E dE

8.3

 

E

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

P E dE

0

 

where

 

 

 

 

P E D C exp ˇE

8.4

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

ˇ D

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

kT

 

 

 

 

and

1

 

 

 

 

 

C D

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

e ˇE

 

The value k D 1.380 Ð 10 23 J/°K is the Boltzmann constant and is essentially the proportionality constant between energy measured in terms of Joules and energy measured in terms of absolute temperature. Planck replaced the continuous integrals in Eq. (8.3) with summations of the discrete energy levels [3]:

1

 

 

 

 

 

EP E

 

 

 

 

 

nD0

 

 

 

 

 

8.5

 

E D

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

P E

 

 

 

 

 

nD0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

1/2 hfe ˇ nC1/2 hf

 

 

 

 

 

 

n

C

 

 

 

D

nD0

 

 

 

 

8.6

 

 

1

 

e ˇ nC1/2 hf

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

nD0

 

It may be easily verified by differentiation that

 

 

 

 

d

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ln

e ˇ nC1/2 hf D E

8.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

dˇ

The argument of the logarithm can be evaluated by recognizing it as an infinite geometric series:

1

e ˇh/2

 

e ˇhf/2 n 0 e nˇhf D

 

8.8

1 e ˇhf

D

 

 

THERMAL NOISE

147

If Eq. (8.8) is substituted back into Eq. (8.7), the average energy can be found:

 

d

 

 

 

 

 

 

E D

 

[ln 1 e ˇhf ln e ˇhf/2]

8.9

dˇ

 

hfe ˇhf

hf

 

 

 

 

D

 

 

C

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 e ˇhf

2

 

 

 

 

 

or

 

 

 

hf

 

h

 

 

 

E D

 

C

8.10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ehf/kT 1

2

 

This will be used as the starting point for finding the noise power.

8.2.2The Nyquist Formula

The thermal noise power in a given bandwidth f is obtained directly from Eq. (8.10):

NT D

hf f

C

hf f

8.11

ehf/kT 1

2

 

At room temperature the second term, hf f/2, plays no role, but

it may

be essential in finding the minimum noise figure for cyrogenically cooled devices [4]. An approximation for the noise power can be found by expanding Eq. (8.11) into a Taylor series:

 

hf

1

hf f

 

hf

 

NT ³ hf f 1 C

 

1

C

 

 

D kT f 1 C

 

8.12

kT

2

 

2kT

At room temperature, hf/kT − 1, so this reduces to the usual practical formula for noise power as given by Nyquist [5]:

NT D kT f

8.13

If this is the available power, the corresponding mean-squared voltage is obtained by multiplying this by four times the resistance, R:

hv2i D 4RNT

D 4RkT f

8.14

The mean-squared noise current is

hi2i D 4GkT f

8.15

where G is the associated conductance.

148 NOISE

8.3SHOT NOISE

Shot noise arises from random variations of a dc current, I0, and is especially associated with current carrying active devices. Shot noise is most apparent in a current source with zero-shunt source admittance. For the purpose of illustration, consider a current source feeding a parallel RLC circuit (Fig. 8.2). The inductor provides a dc current path and is open to ac variations of the current. Hence the resulting noise voltage appears across the resistor (which is presumed free of any thermal noise). If an instrument could measure the current produced by randomly arriving electrons, the instrument would record a series of current impulses for each electron. If n is the average number of electrons emitted by the source in a given time interval t, then the dc current is

qn

8.16

I0 D t

where q is the charge of an electron. Each current pulse provides an energy pulse to the capacitor with the value of

E D

 

q2

 

8.17

 

2C

 

 

 

The average shot noise power delivered to the load is then

 

Ns D

nE

 

t

 

 

 

which in the light of Eqs. (8.16) and (8.17) becomes

 

Ns D

 

nq2

 

 

2C t

 

D

qI0

 

8.18

2C

The equipartition theorem, as found in thermodynamics textbooks, states that the average energy of a system of uniform temperature is equally divided among the degrees of freedom of the system. If there are N degrees of freedom, then

 

 

N

8.19

 

E D

2 kt

I 0

L

C

R < v 2 >

FIGURE 8.2 Equivalent circuit for shot noise and for certain thermal noise calculations.

NOISE CIRCUIT ANALYSIS

149

A system with N degrees of freedom can be described uniquely by N variables. The circuit in Fig. 8.2 has two energy storage elements, each containing an average energy of kT/2. For the capacitor this average energy is

E

D 21 Chv2i D 21 kT

8.20

But it was found that the Nyquist noise formula predicted that hv2i D 4RkT f. Consequently

C D

1

8.21

4R f

Using Eq. (8.21) to replace the value of the capacitance in Eq. (8.18) gives the desired formula for the shot noise power:

Ns D 2qRI0 f

8.22

The corresponding shot noise current is found by dividing by R:

hi2i D 2qI0 f

8.23

The shot noise current is directly proportional to the dc current as has been verified experimentally.

8.4NOISE CIRCUIT ANALYSIS

When a circuit contains several resistors, the total noise power can be calculated by suitable combination of the resistors. Two resistors in series each produce a mean-squared voltage, hv2i. Since the individual noise voltage sources are uncorrelated, the total hv2i is the sum of the hv2i of each of the two resistors. Similarly two conductances in parallel each produce a mean-squared noise current, hi2i, that may be added when the two conductances are combined, since the noise currents are uncorrelated. It should be emphasized that two noise voltages hvi cannot be added together, only the mean-squared values can be added. The use of an arrow in the symbol for a noise current source is used to emphasize that this is a current source. The use of C and signs in the symbol for a noise voltage source are used to emphasize that this is a voltage source. They do not imply anything about the phase of the noise sources. When both series and parallel resistors are present as shown in Fig. 8.3, then Thevenin’s´ theorem provides an equivalent circuit and associated noise voltage. The output resistance is R1 C R2 jjR3, and the corresponding noise voltage delivered to the output is

hv2i D 4kT R1 C R2 jjR3

8.24

When there is reactive element in the circuit such as that shown in the simple RLC circuit in Fig. 8.4, the output noise voltage would be attenuated by the magnitude of total admittance. If the admittance is constant over the bandwidth,

Соседние файлы в предмете Электротехника