Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Public Choice In a Representative Democracy

.pdf
Скачиваний:
11
Добавлен:
23.05.2015
Размер:
921.96 Кб
Скачать

Andreas Freytag

1.Introduction

2.Origins of the State

3.Public Choice in a Direct

Democracy

4.Public Choice in a Representative Democracy

5.Application of Political

Economy Models

6.Normative Public

Choice

Public Choice

Intergovernmental grants under federalism

Is there a justification for grants from one governmental level to another (normally top down)?

Positive externalities, example state highway (US), used by citizens from all US states.

A federal grant then is a Pigouvian subsidy, financed e.g. through lump sum taxes.

What are the effects of …

 

a matching grant (Figure 4.1);

 

 

an unconditional grant (Figure 4.2);

 

 

an earmarked grant?

 

 

Grants can also be justified by financial differences

 

© Freytag 2013

across communities.

11

 

 

Andreas Freytag

1.Introduction

2.Origins of the State

3.Public Choice in a Direct

Democracy

4.Public Choice in a Representative Democracy

5.Application of Political

Economy Models

6.Normative Public

Choice

G

B‘

GMG

B

G0

Public Choice

Figure 4.1: The effects of matching grants

G

F

 

U2

U1

EF – substition effect

 

FG – income effect

 

X

X0

B

© Freytag 2013

12

Andreas Freytag

1.Introduction

2.Origins of the State

3.Public Choice in a Direct

Democracy

4.Public Choice in a Representative Democracy

5.Application of Political

Economy Models

6.Normative Public

Choice

© Freytag 2013

Public Choice

Figure 4.2: The effects of unconditional and earmarked lump-sum grants

G

new budget constraint: BB“B‘

EF income effect, no substitution effect

 

B‘

switch U3

U4 not possible

switch U3

U5 possible

B

GUG F

E

 

 

 

 

G0

 

 

 

 

U1

B

 

 

 

U3

 

U5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U4

X0 XUG

 

 

B‘

X

B

13

 

 

 

 

Andreas Freytag

1.Introduction

2.Origins of the State

3.Public Choice in a Direct

Democracy

4.Public Choice in a Representative Democracy

5.Application of Political

Economy Models

6.Normative Public

Choice

Public Choice

Empirical evidence is contradicting the basis hypothesis as derived from Figure 4.2: Both unconditional and earmarked grants should be divided into an increase of the public good and more private consumption or savings (e.g. via tax reduction).

Flypaper effect: federal money sticks where it lands, in the local governmental budget!

Reasons:

fiscal illusion;

bureaus tend to maximise their budget

 

(Niskanen 1971);

an earmarked grant is treated like a matching

 

grant.

© Freytag 2013

14

Andreas Freytag

1.Introduction

2.Origins of the State

3.Public Choice in a Direct

Democracy

4.Public Choice in a Representative Democracy

5.Application of Political

Economy Models

6.Normative Public

Choice

Public Choice

c) Why may the size of government be too large and too small under federalism?

Assume a two level state with a government only striving for re-election; a very simple model where median voter theorem does not hold.

In the model, spending money increases the probability of re-election, raising taxes decreases it

Under geographic representation, two public goods are in the calculus of the government; GL and GF.

As a result of the optimisation process, the government provides GL on a more then optimal level and GF on a less than optimal one.

Figure 4.3 a) and b).

© Freytag 2013

15

Andreas Freytag

Public Choice

1.Introduction

2.Origins of the State

3.Public Choice in a Direct

Democracy

4.Public Choice in a Representative Democracy

Figure 4.3: Effects of grants on government expenditures in a federalist system

MVL, MCL

5.Application of Political

Economy Models

6.Normative Public

Choice

 

 

MCL

 

MC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MCGL

MVGF

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MV +MVG

F

 

 

 

 

F

 

 

 

GL 0

MVF

GF

0

GG

G0L GGL

GG GGFG0FGTF

© Freytag 2013

(a)

(b)

16

Andreas Freytag

1.Introduction

2.Origins of the State

3.Public Choice in a Direct

Democracy

4.Public Choice in a Representative Democracy

5.Application of Political

Economy Models

6.Normative Public

Choice

Public Choice

II. Two-party competition - deterministic voting

With an increasing size of communities (polities), direct democracy becomes unrealistic. Thus, decisions are taken by representatives. These are assumed to behave rationally and as utility maximisers.

Put differently: “…parties formulate policies in order to win

elections, rather than win elections in order to formulate policies.” (Downs 1957, p. 28, cited after Mueller 2003, p. 230).

Three important aspects

© Freytag 2013

behaviour of representatives (campaign and office),),

behaviour of voters,

outcome under representative democracy. 17

Andreas Freytag

1.Introduction

2.Origins of the State

3.Public Choice in a Direct

Democracy

4.Public Choice in a Representative Democracy

5.Application of Political

Economy Models

6.Normative Public

Choice

Public Choice

Much of what we learned with respect to direct democracy, also applies to representative democracy, e.g.

median outcome,

cycling,

log-rolling.

a) Outcomes in the Hotelling-Downs-Model

The basic model is the Downs model.* However, the first to analyse political competition in a spatial model was Harold Hotelling.**

The easiest way to think of Hotelling’s model is to imagine a western city with a couple of saloons. Where will you find the saloons?

 

* Downs, Anthony (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York.

© Freytag 2013

** Hotelling, Harold (1929), ‘Stability in Competition’, The Economic Journal, Vol18. 39,

 

pp. 41-57.

Andreas Freytag

1.Introduction

2.Origins of the State

3.Public Choice in a Direct

Democracy

4.Public Choice in a Representative Democracy

5.Application of Political

Economy Models

6.Normative Public

Choice

Public Choice

Figure 4.4: Median voter outcomes under two-party competition

Number of

voters

 

L

X M

R

Position of

 

candidates 19

© Freytag 2013

 

 

Andreas Freytag

Public Choice

Number of

voters

1.Introduction

2.Origins of the State

3.Public Choice in a Direct

Democracy

4.Public Choice in a Representative Democracy

5.Application of Political

Economy Models

6.Normative Public

Choice

X M

Position of

Number of

candidates

voters

 

© Freytag 2013

M

Position of

 

20

 

candidates

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]