Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5894_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •PEGylated Nanocarriers in Medicine and Pharmacy
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Editors and Contributors
- •About the Editors
- •Contributors
- •1.1.3.1 Passive Targeting Agent
- •1.1.3.2 Solubility Enhancers
- •1. PEGylated Pharmaceutical Nanocarriers
- •1.1 PEGylation
- •1.1.1 PEG Characteristics
- •1.2 PEGylation Determination
- •1.2.2.1 Thermal Gravimetric Analysis (TGA)
- •1.2.2.2 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)
- •1.2.2.4 X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
- •1.3.1 Nanoparticulate System
- •1.3.1.1 Solid Lipid Nanoparticles
- •1.3.1.2 Nanostructured Lipid Carriers (NLCs)
- •1.3.1.3 Polymeric Nanoparticles
- •1.3.2 Metal Nanoparticles
- •1.3.2.1 Silver Nanoparticles
- •1.3.2.2 Gold Nanoparticles
- •1.3.2.3 Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles
- •1.3.2.4 Copper Nanoparticles
- •1.3.3 Vesicular Systems
- •1.3.3.1 Liposomes
- •1.3.3.2 Niosomes
- •1.3.3.3 Ethosomes
- •1.4.1 Cancer
- •1.4.2 Gene Delivery
- •1.4.3 Diagnostics Imaging
- •1.4.4 Vaccines
- •1.4.5 Rheumatoid Arthritis
- •1.4.6 Hemophilia
- •1.4.7 Pain Therapy
- •1.4.8 Diabetes
- •1.4.9 Others
- •1.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •Nanoprecipitation (Solvent Diffusion)
- •Emulsification (Solvent Evaporation or Nanoemulsion)
- •Physical Adsorption Strategy
- •2.2.2.1 Pre-Insertion PEGylation
- •2.2.2.2 Post-Insertion PEGylation
- •2.3.1 Indirect Assessment (Qualitative Assessment)
- •2.3.1.1 Particle Size
- •2.3.1.2 Zeta Potential
- •2.3.1.3 Surface Hydrophilicity
- •2.3.1.4 Microscopic Techniques
- •2.3.1.5 Fourier Transform-Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR)
- •2.3.2 Direct Assessment (Quantitative Assessment)
- •2.3.2.1 Colorimetric Methods
- •2.3.2.2 Chromatographic Methods
- •2.3.2.4 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)
- •2.3.2.5 X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Characterization Techniques
- •3.3 Infrared Spectroscopy
- •3.4 Raman Spectroscopy
- •3.5 X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
- •3.6 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
- •3.7 Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy
- •3.8 Mass Spectroscopy (MS)
- •3.9 Thermogravimetric Analysis
- •3.10 Differential Scanning Calorimetry
- •3.11 Atomic Force Microscopy
- •3.12 Scanning Electron Microscopy
- •3.13 Transmission Electron Microscopy
- •3.14 Conclusion
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.3.1 Nanoparticles PEGylation
- •4.3.2 Polyplexes (PP) PEGylation
- •4.5.1 Systemic Drug Delivery
- •4.5.2 Nonsystemic Drug Delivery
- •4.5.2.3 PEGylated Intravaginal Nanocarriers
- •4.5.2.6 Vaccines Entrapped PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •4.6.2 PEG Molecular Weight (MW)
- •4.7 PEGylated Nanocarriers Products
- •4.8.3 Disadvantageous Physicochemical Properties
- •4.8.5 Limited RES Evasion Capacity
- •4.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.1.2 PEG Solubility Characteristics
- •5.2 Water-Soluble PEGylated Small Molecule Drugs
- •5.3 Soluble PEGylated Proteins/Enzymes
- •5.3.2 Organic Solvent–Soluble PEGylated Proteins/Enzymes
- •5.4 Water-Soluble PEGylated Drug Nanocarriers
- •5.4.1 Water-Soluble PEGylated Silicon Nanocarriers
- •5.4.2 Water-Soluble PEGylated Carbon Nanotubes
- •5.4.4 Water-Soluble PEGylated Dendrimers
- •5.4.5 Water-Soluble PEGylated Polymeric Micelles
- •5.5 Hydrated or Hydrophilic PEGylated Drug Nanocarriers
- •5.5.1 Hydrated PEGylated Lipid Nanocarriers
- •5.5.2 Hydrophilic PEG-Coated Zein Nanocarriers
- •References
- •5.6.4.1 PEG Chain Length/Molecular Weight
- •6.1 Introduction
- •Increased Solubility
- •Improved Stability
- •Reduced Immunogenicity
- •Enhanced Circulation Time
- •Heterogeneity
- •6.3.1 Enhancing Immune Responses
- •6.3.2 Suppressing Immune Responses
- •6.3.3 Immune Evasion
- •6.4.1 Strategies to Overcome Immunological Barriers
- •6.4.1.1 PEGylation
- •6.4.1.2 Cell Membranes
- •6.4.1.3 Carbohydrates
- •6.4.1.4 Proteins
- •6.6.1 Cancer Therapy
- •6.6.2 Gene Therapy
- •6.6.3 Immunotherapy
- •6.6.4 Central Nervous System (CNS) Drug Delivery
- •6.6.5 Pulmonary Drug Delivery
- •6.6.6 Ocular Drug Delivery
- •6.6.7 Cardiovascular (CVS) Drug Delivery
- •6.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.3 Nanocarrier-Based Targeted Drug Delivery
- •7.4.1 Covalent Approach
- •7.4.2 Non-covalent Approach
- •7.4.2.1 PEGylation Via Monovalent Interactions
- •High-Affinity Host-Guest Interactions
- •7.4.2.2 PEGylation Via Multivalent Interactions
- •PEGylated Block Copolymers
- •PEGylated Graft Copolymers
- •Polyelectrolyte Complex-Based Systems
- •Non-ionic Interaction-Based Systems
- •PEGylated Dendritic Copolymers
- •PEGylated Copolymers Utilizing Mobile Side Groups
- •7.5 Various Targeting Strategies
- •7.5.1 Active Targeting
- •7.5.2 Passive Targeting
- •7.5.2.1 PEG Dilemma
- •7.7.1 Brain Disorders
- •7.7.2 Pulmonary Disorders
- •7.7.3 Cancer
- •7.7.4 Inflammatory Disorders
- •7.7.5 Bone Disorders
- •7.7.6 Blood Disorders
- •7.8 Stimuli-Sensitive Nanocarriers
- •7.8.1 External-Responsive Nanocarriers
- •7.8.1.1 Ultrasound-Responsive PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •7.8.1.2 Thermal-Responsive PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •7.8.1.3 Magnetic Responsive PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •7.8.2 Internal-Responsive Nanocarriers
- •7.8.2.1 pH-Responsive Systems
- •7.8.2.2 Redox-Responsive Systems
- •7.8.2.3 Enzyme-Responsive Systems
- •7.8.2.4 Hypoxia-Responsive Systems
- •7.8.3 Multimodal Responsive Nanocarriers
- •7.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.3.1 PEGylated Liposome
- •8.3.2 PEGylated Micelles
- •8.3.3 PEGylated Nanogels
- •8.3.4 PEGylated Inorganic Nanoparticles
- •8.3.5 PEGylated Polymeric Nanoparticles
- •8.4.1 Cancer
- •8.4.1.1 Breast Cancer
- •8.4.1.2 Lung Cancer
- •8.4.1.3 Colon Cancer
- •8.4.1.4 Brain Cancer
- •8.4.2 Autoimmune Diseases
- •8.4.3 Inflammatory Disorders
- •8.4.4 Cardiovascular Diseases
- •8.4.5 Ocular Diseases
- •8.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.4.1.1 Amino Acid Modifications
- •9.4.1.3 Cysteine Thiol Residue Conjugation
- •9.4.2 Releasable PEGs
- •9.7.1.1 Cationic Lipid Toxicology
- •9.8 RNA Lipid Nanoparticle
- •9.13 Conclusion
- •References
- •10.2.1 PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •10.2.1.1 Polymeric NPs
- •10.2.1.2 Liposomes
- •10.2.1.3 Dendrimers
- •10.2.1.4 Polymeric Micelles
- •10.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.1.2 Factors Influencing PPDs’ Short-Term Efficiency
- •11.2 What Is PEGylation?
- •11.3.1 Random PEGylation
- •11.3.2 Site-Specific PEGylation
- •11.3.2.1 Amine Conjugation
- •11.3.2.2 Cysteine Conjugation
- •11.4.1 Binding Affinity
- •11.4.2 Altered Biological Activity
- •11.4.3 Physicochemical Modifications
- •11.4.4 PEG Size
- •11.4.5 PEG Structure
- •11.6 PK Profiling
- •11.9 FDA-Approved PEGylated Products
- •11.11 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.1.2 Current Market Scenario
- •12.2.1 PEGylated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2.1 PEGylated Lipid-Based NPs
- •13.2.2 PEGylated Polymeric Nanoparticles
- •13.2.3 PEGylated Metal-Based Nanoparticles
- •13.2.4 Multifunctional PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •13.2.5 Targeted PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •13.3.1 Surface Modification Chemistry
- •13.3.2 Polymer Chemistry
- •13.3.4 Characterization Techniques
- •13.4.1 Longer Circulation Time
- •13.4.2 Enhanced Cellular Uptake
- •13.4.3 Controlled Drug Release
- •13.5.1 Cancer Theragnostic
- •13.5.2 Cardiovascular Theragnostic
- •13.7.2 Prolonged Circulation Time
- •13.7.3 Improved Drug Delivery
- •13.7.4 Diagnostic Functionality
- •13.8 Technical Challenges
- •13.8.4 Limited Clinical Validation
- •13.10 Conclusion
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Reversible PEGylation Strategies
- •14.2.1 Reversible PEGylation Chemistry
- •14.2.2.1 Aromatic Linkers
- •14.2.2.2 Aliphatic Linkers
- •14.2.3 Cleavage Linkers
- •14.2.3.1 Hydrolyzable Linkers
- •14.2.3.2 Enzymatically Cleavable Linkers
- •14.2.4 pH-Responsive PEGylation
- •14.2.4.1 Proteasome Inhibitor MG132
- •14.2.5 Temperature-Responsive PEGylation
- •14.2.6 Light-Responsive PEGylation
- •14.3.1 Analytical Techniques
- •Zeta Potential
- •Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography (HIC)
- •Near Infrared (NIR) Spectroscopy
- •Fourier Transform-Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR)
- •13C-NMR
- •Mass Spectrometry
- •High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
- •Calorimetry
- •X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)
- •Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)
- •TGA-DSC
- •14.3.2.1 Protein Adsorption
- •14.3.2.2 Cellular Association
- •14.3.2.5 Bioactivity Assay
- •14.3.2.6 Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
- •14.3.2.7 Sandwich ELISA
- •14.3.2.8 Anti-PEG ELISA
- •14.3.3.1 In Vivo Blood Circulation Half-Life
- •14.3.3.2 Radiolabeling
- •14.4.1 Therapeutic Applications
- •14.4.1.1 Anticancer Activity
- •14.4.1.2 Antibiotic Administration
- •14.4.1.3 Enzyme-Replacement Therapy
- •14.4.1.4 Red Blood Cell Substitution
- •14.4.1.5 Oxygen Toxicity Diseases
- •14.4.2 Pharmaceutical Applications
- •14.4.2.1 PEGylated Liposomes
- •14.4.2.2 PEGylated Proteins
- •14.4.2.3 Targeted Delivery
- •14.5.1 Design Complexity
- •14.5.3 Biological Environment Stability
- •14.5.4 Trigger Selection
- •14.5.5 Immunogenicity
- •14.5.6 Scale-up Difficulties
- •14.5.8 Cost
- •14.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •15. Stimuli-Responsive PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.2 External Stimuli-Responsive Systems
- •15.2.1 Thermoresponsive Systems
- •15.2.2 Magnetically Responsive Systems
- •15.2.3 Ultrasound-Triggered Drug Delivery
- •15.2.4 Light-Triggered Drug Delivery
- •15.2.5 Electroresponsive Systems
- •15.3 Internal Stimuli-Responsive Systems
- •15.3.1 pH-Responsive Systems
- •15.3.2 Redox-Responsive Systems
- •15.3.3 Enzyme-Responsive Systems
- •15.3.4 Self-Regulated Systems
- •15.4.3 Multistimuli Responsive Systems
- •15.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.3 PEGylated Products
- •16.3.1 PEGylated Liposomes
- •16.3.2 PEGylated G-CSF
- •16.3.3 PEGylated Proteins
- •16.3.4 PEGylated Nanoparticles
- •16.5.1 Poly(Zwitterions)
- •16.5.2 Poly(Glycerols)
- •16.5.3 Poly(Amino Acids)
- •16.5.4 Poly(Oxazolines)
- •16.5.6 Poly(Vinylpyrrolidones)
- •16.5.8 Polypeptides
- •16.5.9 Carbohydrate-Based Systems
- •16.5.10 Hydrophilic Polymers
- •16.5.11 Non-PEGylated Nanoparticles
- •16.6 Future Prospects
- •16.7 Conclusion
- •References

16 Beyond PEGylation “PEGylation andits Alternatives”
477
(c) Additionally, polypeptides can be customized with specic sequences and
lengths, allowing for precise control over their properties and interactions with
other molecules, making them valuable for tailoring drug delivery systems to
specic therapeutic needs.
(d) Polypeptides offer diverse functionalities, including amino acids with side
chains, which can be used for drug conjugation and targeting ligands.
(e) They are naturally compatible with biological systems, allowing them to inter-
act more effectively with cells, tissues, and biological molecules than synthetic
polymers.
(f) Some polypeptides, like β-sheet-forming peptides, can self-assemble into sta-
ble secondary structures, enhancing drug delivery and controlled release.
Polypeptides are particularly useful in applications like tissue engineering,
wound healing, and regenerative medicine, as they mimic extracellular matrix
components and are biocompatible with biological structures (Hosseinkhani
etal. 2013).
Excluding hydrophobic and highly polar amino acids from a polypeptide
sequence increases drug delivery or the system’s solubility. Taking advantage of this
benet, the circulation half-life of the drug can be enhanced by using homopolymers of genetically encoded amino acids (Bolze etal. 2016; Falvo etal. 2016). PAS,
a polypeptide composed of proline, alanine, and serine, was biodegradable and
hydrophilic, with a large hydrodynamic volume and surface charge. The highly
soluble formulation not only showed antihemolytic activity but was also distributed
and cleared similarly to PEG.PASylation is dened as “the genetic infusion of a
conformationally unfolded homopolymer of PAS with therapeutic proteins or
drugs” (Harari etal. 2014; Kuhn et al. 2016). In mouse models, the stability of
PASylated products was demonstrated in serum, with no organ distribution and
minimal immunogenicity and toxicity. Though this class of products is yet to be
investigated in the clinic, they have been widely employed to extend the systemic
circulation of leptins, antibody fragments, chemotherapeutics, interferons, and
growth hormones and for various therapeutic as well as diagnostic purposes
(Mendler etal. 2015; Morath etal. 2015; Schlapschy etal. 2013). Another study
reported an intriguing genetic fusion of XTEN, a polypeptide sequence, with a protein that resulted in a 60-fold increase in plasma half-life. XTEN is a hydrophilic,
stable homopolymer with an indenite structure. It is non-immunogenic and consists of certain amino acid sequences (alanine, glutamic acid, glycine, proline, serine, threonine). XTEN fusions have been further extended to glucagon, factor VII,
green uorescent protein, and human growth hormone to improve the efcacy of the
respective systems in diverse invivo models (Podust etal. 2016; Schellenberger
etal. 2009; Strohl 2015).
Polypeptides offer advantages like enzymatic degradation and structural stability, but may also face challenges in large-scale production. The choice between PEG
and polypeptides depends on the drug delivery system’s requirements and desired
properties, and researchers carefully consider these factors when selecting the most
suitable polymer (Fig.16.14).

478
Fig. 16.14 Chemical structure of cyclized polypeptide as an alternative to PEG
S. Mohanta et al.
Fig. 16.15 Structure of carbohydrate-based polymers
16.5.9 Carbohydrate-Based Systems
Carbohydrates, nucleic acids, and proteins are important natural macromolecules
for life. Synthetic carbohydrates can be good candidates for applications in polymer
and pharmaceutical research. They can have a linear, comb-type, branched, or
dendrimer- like structure (Tolstyka etal. 2016) (Fig.16.15).
Carbohydrate-based systems exhibit a PEG-like effect due to their hydrophilicity
and steric hindrance, which form a protective layer on drug delivery systems or
biomaterials. This layer minimizes protein adsorption, extending the circulation
time and enhancing bioavailability. Carbohydrate-based systems can also mimic
glycoproteins and glycolipids found on cell surfaces, effectively “camouaging”
themselves from the immune system. This molecular mimicry can reduce immune
responses and prevent immune-mediated clearance of the drug delivery system.
Carbohydrates are biocompatible, making them suitable for drug delivery reducing
the likelihood of adverse reactions or immunogenicity. The chemistry in their conjugation is crucial in understanding these mechanisms (Moros etal. 2012).

16 Beyond PEGylation “PEGylation andits Alternatives”
479
Carbohydrate-based systems can be conjugated to drug carriers, nanoparticles,
or other substrates through various chemical reactions. The specic chemistry used
depends on the functional groups on the carbohydrate and the substrate’s surface.
Carbohydrates can be functionalized with specic reactive groups, such as amino
(-NH2), carboxyl (-COOH), or thiol (-SH) groups, during synthesis or chemical
modications. Chemical conjugation can occur through amidation, thiol-disulde
exchange, or carbodiimide-mediated coupling. If both carbohydrate and substrate
have compatible functional groups, they can be covalently linked to form a stable
bond. Some carbohydrate-based systems can be conjugated using enzymatic or glycosylation reactions, mimicking natural glycosylation processes in living organisms. The carbohydrate-based system and chemistry choice depend on the
application and desired drug delivery properties. Carbohydrate-based systems offer
an attractive alternative to PEG, providing similar benets in drug delivery and
biomaterials while aligning with the biocompatibility of natural carbohydrates (Su
etal. 2021).
Aside from their biological activities, they are suitable candidates for PEG substitutes due to intrinsic qualities that render them chemically well-dened, compact,
biocompatible, highly hydrated, synthetically exible, and less susceptible to aggregation and protein adsorption. Both polysaccharides (dextran, starch, hydroxyethyl
starch (HES), and hyaluronic acid) and oligosaccharides (from one to twelve sugar
units) have been widely investigated. Dextran-coated nanocarriers, like PEG and
HES, have demonstrated low protein adsorption and prolonged circulation durations (Besheer etal. 2007). Carbohydrates, combined with their active biological
role of interacting with cell surfaces or specic proteins, have emerged as desirable
candidates for biotherapeutic applications (Sizovs etal. 2013; Luyckx and Baudouin
2011). Trehalose is an exciting example of a naturally occurring disaccharide. It is
a nonreducing sugar with glucose units joined by α,α’-1,1-glucosidic bond, another
compelling example of a carbohydrate. It has shown fascinating biochemical properties, rendering them appealing for research in academia and industry (Gu
etal. 2014).
16.5.10 Hydrophilic Polymers
Hydrophilic polymers have numerous applications, including drug delivery (Knop
et al. 2010; Hildebrand et al. 2017), self-assembly (Willersinn et al. 2017), and
catalysis (Ge et al. 2007). As a result, research into hydrophilic polymers is an
essential aspect of polymer science. Signicant areas of investigation have been
structure-property relationships and their interactions with biological entities
(Rudolph etal. 2013; Takahashi etal. 2018; Cuomo etal. 2012). Synthetic polymer
chemistry offers new possibilities for advanced characteristics and prospects using
innovative hydrophilic polymers and structures (Liu etal. 2018; Mccormick and
Lowe 2004). Hydrophilic polymers have essential features not just when dissolved
but also when crosslinked, as in the case of hydrogels. This class of materials has
various intriguing features as well as customizable size and morphology, which are

480
S. Mohanta et al.
of great importance for pharmaceutical applications (Thiele etal. 2014). Hydrophilic
polymers include poly(acrylamide) and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG). It has to be
noted that some polymers, such as poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate), are hydrophilic and water-swellable albeit with poor aqueous solubility. Even for hydrophilic
polymers, water solubility varies according to polymer concentration, type, and
molecular weight. As a result, they may not be distinguished based just on solubility
(Schmidt 2019) (Fig.16.16).
Hydrogels are hydrophilic polymer materials known for their biocompatibility,
swelling, and soft texture. They nd applications in areas such as tissue engineering
and implants. Reports have described polymer self-assembly combined with hydrogel formation has been described, with the double hydrophilic block copolymer
poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone)-b-poly (oligo ethylene glycol methacrylate) coupled with
α-cyclodextrin (α-CD). This results in thermo-responsive hydrogels that exhibit distinct mechanical properties upon cooling to room temperature (Jiang etal. 2016).
Cyclic cyclodextrin (CD) can not only be applied for gelation but can also be utilized in stimulus-responsive hydrogels for drug entrapment. Bian etal. synthesized
an amphiphilic polymer by combining hydrophilic acrylamide, hydrophobic
N-dodecyl acrylamide, and sodium acrylate, which delayed the formation of phenolic network crosslinking points (Xu etal. 2019). Cuomo and coworkers described a
Fig. 16.16 Chemical structure of epoxy poly(AAG-AA), a hydrophilic polymer

16 Beyond PEGylation “PEGylation andits Alternatives”
481
hydrogel based on an emulsion of alginate and lemon grass essential oil, which was
studied for mechanical properties.
Thiele and coworkers reported a polysaccharide hydrogel targeting microgels via
microuidics (Hauck etal. 2018). Combining chitosan or hyaluronic acid with tertbutyl isocyanide and a PEG crosslinker allowed for the fabrication of mono- disperse
microgels with sizes in the 70–100μm range. Functional microgels were formed by
adding functional carboxylic acids in the Ugi crosslinking reaction, potentially
valuable for drug delivery. Lensen and coworkers described the microstructure of
PEG-based hydrogels, revealing the strong effect of the polymerization process on
the size of crystalline domains. With this understanding, crystallization behavior in
PEG-based hydrogels can be ne-tuned to improve material properties (Zhang
etal. 2018).
Reinforcement via nanoparticles has also been explored to investigate the formation and mechanical properties of Laponite/cellulose-based hydrogels (Xie etal.
2018). When Laponite was combined with silanized hydroxypropyl methylcellu-
lose, a signicant reinforcement effect was observed, increasing the storage modulus by an order of magnitude. Fluorescent microsphere tracking analysis was used
to investigate the hydrogel architecture, revealing two domains: loose aggregates in
the periphery and dense Laponite structures in the core.
Hydrophilic polymers have been applied in the biomedical eld with advances in
drugs and vaccines in the form of polymeric nanomaterials. These nanoparticles
exhibit targeted delivery and sustained release (Secker etal. 2015). Poly(peptoids)
have gained attention, with Barz et al. developing siRNA polyplexes with
poly(sarcosine) as a shielding agent. They reported the formation of lipo-oligomer
structure and siRNA polyplexes, with the oligomer consisting of cholanic acids
coupled through a bioreducible disulde linker. The ability to shield was tested
using invivo imaging and biophysical assays, revealing prolonged systemic circulation time on par with the gold standard PEG (Klein etal. 2018) (Table16.1).
16.5.11 Non-PEGylated Nanoparticles
Non-PEGylated microparticles and nanoparticles (Fig. 16.17), mainly inorganic
nanoparticles such as iron, gold, silver, hafnium, ceramic silica, and carbon nanotubes, have sparked considerable interest in tissue engineering, drug delivery, and
diagnostic formulations (Anselmo and Mitragotri 2015, 2016). Metal nanoparticles
with about 1–100nm diameters are appealing owing to their distinct physicochemical characteristics, such as enhanced surface-area-to-volume ratio, small size, and
conductivity. They are also amenable to surface modication and can be designed to
respond to external stimuli with pharmacokinetics suitable for systemic delivery
(Huang etal. 2011). Because of their increased permeability and retention, nanoparticles preferentially concentrate at malignant tumor sites.
Non-PEGylated nanoparticles can be modied to achieve a PEG-like effect
through chemical reactions and surface functionalization. These methods include
hydrophilic coating, ligand attachment, surface modication, and stealth coatings.

482
Table 16.1 Comparison between different alternative polymers for PEG
Name of Polymer
Polyzwitterions Chemical exibility,
Polyglycerols (PGs) Biocompatibility, easy
Polyvinyl pyrolidones
(PVP)
Polyoxazolines (Pox) Low PDI values,
Polyacrylamides Easy functionalization
Poly[oligo(ethylene
glycol) methyl ether
methacrylate]
(POEGMA)
Polyamino acids Biodegradable,
Carbohydrate-based Biodegradable, low
Advantages Disadvantages
Nondegradable, high
zwitterionic nanovectors,
biocompatibility,
non-fouling, prolonged
blood circulation, and
multifunctionality
synthesis, immune
invasion, and prolonged
circulation due to
hyperbranched
polyglycerol (HPG)s
Biocompatible and
stabilizer
exible end-group
chemistry,
biodegradability, and
biocompatibility
due to hydroxyl groups,
Biocompatible and
fouling
Biocompatible, Easy
chemical modication,
Thermoresponsive,
Biodegradable
Decreased ABC
phenomenon,
Biocompatible
immunogenicity,
nontoxic, easy chemical
modication,
biocompatible
synthesis and
modication cost
Nonbiodegradability,
accumulation in tissues
Enhanced protein
adsorption, slower
biodegradation
Higher synthesis cost
and no FDA approval
Nonbiodegradability,
degradation by thermal
and photolytic effect,
resultant monomer gives
neurotoxic effect
Microbial
contamination, excessive
hydration, and reduced
viscosity on storage
Variable chemistry,
broad or mixed
molecular weights
S. Mohanta et al.
Reference
Qian etal.
(2022), Zheng
etal. (2017)
Hoang Thi etal.
(2020)
Hadjesfandiari
and Parambath
(2018), Knop
etal. (2010)
Hoang Thi etal.
(2020)
Hadjesfandiari
and Parambath
(2018), Knop
etal. (2010)
Lutz (2008)
Boddu etal.
(2021)
Barclay etal.
(2019), Hoang
Thi etal. (2020)
Hydrophilic polymers like dextran, chitosan, or albumin can be conjugated to the
nanoparticle’s surface through covalent bonding (Salatin and Yari Khosroushahi
2017). Ligands, peptides, or biomimetic materials can enhance biocompatibility
and enable targeted drug delivery. Surface modications, such as adsorption or
encapsulation of hydrophilic materials, create a hydrophilic shell around the
nanoparticles. Stealth coatings can be formed using materials like zwitterions or
synthetic polymers.

16 Beyond PEGylation “PEGylation andits Alternatives”
Fig. 16.17 Structure of a
non-PEGylated
nanoparticle
483
Non-PEGylated nanoparticles should be synthesized and characterized to meet
high standards of quality, purity, and consistency. Biocompatibility testing should
be conducted to evaluate safety and interactions with biological systems. Sterility
should be maintained during preparation and handling, especially in medical and
biological applications. Chemical compatibility should be veried to avoid degradation, reduced efcacy, or undesired by-products. Dosage optimization should be
determined for each specic application, as excessive amounts may not improve
effectiveness or lead to undesirable side effects.
Non-PEGylated gold nanoparticles are used in cancer therapeutic applications
like drug delivery and photothermal therapy due to their high biocompatibility, minimal cytotoxicity, and low immunogenicity. They are compatible with biological
systems and have limited inammation and foreign body responses. Toxicity studies show no acute toxicity, but thorough characterization and purication are crucial. Sterile handling is essential to prevent contamination. The optimal dosage and
concentration should be determined for each cancer therapeutic application. The
safety prole varies depending on the nanoparticles used and their application, and
comprehensive safety assessments and studies are essential. Researchers should reference peer-reviewed sources for safety assessments and research (Gamucci
etal. 2014).
Metal nanoparticle-based therapeutic systems are being investigated in various
stages of preclinical and clinical development for the therapy as well as diagnosis of
diseases such as cancer, liver cirrhosis, and anemia. While more research is warranted to understand the long-term effects of nanoparticles, current treatment
options can be improved by enhancing bioavailability and efcacy via an approach
that combines inorganic metal nanoparticles conjugated to small molecule entities
(Na etal. 2009).
16.6 Future Prospects
Although the FDA has approved natural polymers such as polypeptides, polysaccharides, and nucleotides for various indications, scientists have tried to develop
synthetic polymers that can perform better. Among other synthetic polymers, linear
PEG has been demonstrated to be superior for multiple applications.

484
S. Mohanta et al.
Even though PEGylation provides numerous benets, new research has shown
critical shortcomings such as immune activation, poor degradability, and potential
aggregation. The enormous advances in macromolecular engineering and polymer
chemistry have aided in exploring substitutes for PEG that can address the abovementioned limitations. Polymeric systems such as poly(glycerol)s,
poly(vinylpyrrolidone), poly(amino acid)s, poly(N-(2-hydro-xypropyl) methacrylamide), and poly(2-oxazoline)s have shown potential as far as hydrophilicity, aqueous solubility, stealth properties, and biocompatibility are concerned. However,
none of them have been approved by the FDA yet, and further research is required
to properly evaluate and compare them with PEG through a comprehensive analysis
of polymer structure as well as cellular interactions.
16.7 Conclusion
PEGylation is, without a doubt, a very versatile and effective bioconjugation
method. PEGylation of nanoparticles allows for effective transport of hydrophobic
medicines, prolongs systemic circulation, enhances mucus penetration, and
improves the stability of biotherapeutics. As a result, PEGylation has emerged as an
invaluable technique for nanomedicine modication to enable the development of
safe and efcacious drug delivery systems. Nonetheless, the anti-PEG immune
response is a vexing problem that compromises the safety of drugs. So far, potential
PEG alternatives are yet to be successfully translated to the clinic. Studies investigating the immunogenic potential of PEG have demonstrated that the clearance of
subsequent doses of the drug can be primarily attributed to the anti-PEG antibodies
produced after the rst dose. If the patient has preexisting antibodies due to prior
exposure to PEG in domestic or cosmetic goods, the rst dose can elicit an immune
response. It is, therefore, critical to understand the parameters that inuence the
development of anti-PEG antibodies to design innovative drug vectors or change the
injection schedule and/or administration route and achieve therapeutic efcacy.
While PEG alternatives will be aggressively investigated in the near future, we
believe that PEG will continue to be extensively used for bioconjugation to enable
effective drug delivery.
Acknowledgments The author RKT acknowledges the Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry
of Chemicals and Fertilizers, India, for supporting the drug discovery and formulation research at
NIPER Ahmedabad. R.K.T also acknowledges the Department of Science and Technology,
Government of India, for a Core Research Grant funding (File No. CRG/2021/005402) and also
acknowledges the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, for the grant File Id:
2021-14161 and grant File Id: IIRP-2023-4849/F1 for supporting research in RKT lab.

16 Beyond PEGylation “PEGylation andits Alternatives”
485
References
Aapro M, Bohlius J, Cameron DA, Dal Lago L, Donnelly JP, Kearney N, Lyman G, Pettengell
R, Tjan-Heijnen V, Walewski (2011) 2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of
granulocyte- colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile
neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours. European
J Cancer 47:8–32
Abbina S, Vappala S, Kumar P, Siren EM, La CC, Abbasi U, Brooks DE, Kizhakkedathu JN (2017)
Hyperbranched polyglycerols: recent advances in synthesis, biocompatibility and biomedical
applications. J Mater Chem B 5:9249–9277
Alconcel SN, Baas AS, Maynard HD (2011) FDA-approved poly (ethylene glycol)–protein conju-
gate drugs. Polym Chem 2:1442–1448
Allen TM, Cullis PR (2004) Drug delivery systems: entering the mainstream. Science
303:1818–1822
Allen TM, Cullis PR (2013) Liposomal drug delivery systems: from concept to clinical applica-
tions. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65:36–48
Amoozgar Z, Yeo Y (2012) Recent advances in stealth coating of nanoparticle drug delivery sys-
tems. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 4:219–233
Anselmo AC, Mitragotri S (2015) A review of clinical translation of inorganic nanoparticles.
AAPS J 17:1041–1054
Anselmo A, Mitragotri S (2016) Nanoparticles in the clinic. Bioeng Transl Med 1:10–29
Barclay TG, Day CM, Petrovsky N, Garg S (2019) Review of polysaccharide particle-based func-
tional drug delivery. Carbohydr Polym 221:94–112
Besheer A, Hause G, Kressler J, Mäder K (2007) Hydrophobically modied hydroxyethyl starch:
synthesis, characterization, and aqueous self-assembly into nano-sized polymeric micelles and
vesicles. Biomacromolecules 8:359–367
Boddu SH, Bhagav P, Karla PK, Jacob S, Adatiya MD, Dhameliya TM, Ranch KM, Tiwari AK
(2021) Polyamide/poly (amino acid) polymers for drug delivery. J Funct Biomater 12:58
Bolze F, Morath V, Bast A, Rink N, Schlapschy M, Mocek S, Skerra A, Klingenspor M (2016)
Long-acting PASylated leptin ameliorates obesity by promoting satiety and preventing hypo-
metabolism in leptin-decient Lepob/ob mice. Endocrinology 157:233–244
Bond TC, Szabo E, Gabriel S, Klastersky J, Tomey O, Mueller U, Schwartzberg L, Tang B (2018)
Meta-analysis and indirect treatment comparison of lipeglgrastim with peglgrastim and l-
grastim for the reduction of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia-related events. J Oncol Pharm
Pract 24:412–423
Botteri E, Krendyukov A, Curigliano G (2018) Comparing granulocyte colony–stimulating factor
lgrastim and peglgrastim to its biosimilars in terms of efcacy and safety: a meta-analysis of
randomised clinical trials in breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 89:49–55
Caló E, Khutoryanskiy VV (2015) Biomedical applications of hydrogels: a review of patents and
commercial products. Eur Polym J 65:252–267
Cao Z, Jiang S (2012) Super-hydrophilic zwitterionic poly (carboxybetaine) and amphiphilic non-
ionic poly (ethylene glycol) for stealth nanoparticles. Nano Today 7:404–413
Cao Z, Brault N, Xue H, Keefe A, Jiang S (2011) Manipulating sticky and non-sticky properties in
a single material. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:6102–6104
Cao Y, Liu M, Zhang K, Dong J, Zu G, Chen Y, Zhang T, Xiong D, Pei R (2016) Preparation of
linear poly (glycerol) as a T 1 contrast agent for tumor-targeted magnetic resonance imaging.
J Mater Chem B 4:6716–6725
Carter PJ (2011) Introduction to current and future protein therapeutics: a protein engineering
perspective. Exp Cell Res 317:1261–1269
Cattani G, Vogeley L, Crowley PB (2015) Structure of a PEGylated protein reveals a highly porous
double-helical assembly. Nat Chem 7:823–828
Cornes P, Gascon P, Chan S, Hameed K, Mitchell CR, Field P, Latymer M, Arantes LH (2018)
Systematic review and meta-analysis of short-versus long-acting granulocyte colony-

486
stimulating factors for reduction of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia. Adv Ther
35:1816–1829
Crawford J, Caserta C, Roila F (2010) Hematopoietic growth factors: ESMO clinical practice
guidelines for the applications. Ann Oncol 21:v248–v251
Cuomo F, Lopez F, Ceglie A, Maiuro L, Miguel MG, Lindman B (2012) pH-responsive liposome-
templated polyelectrolyte nanocapsules. Soft Matter 8:4415–4420
De Volder J, Vereecke L, Joos G, Maes T (2020) Targeting neutrophils in asthma: a therapeutic
opportunity? Biochem Pharmacol 182:114292
Dozier JK, Distefano MD (2015) Site-specic PEGylation of therapeutic proteins. Int J Mol Sci
16:25831–25864
Drago SE, Craparo EF, Luxenhofer R, Cavallaro G (2021) Development of polymer-based
nanoparticles for zileuton delivery to the lung: PMeOx and PMeOzi surface chemistry reduces
interactions with mucins. Nanomedicine 37:102451
Dzieciuch M, Rissanen S, Szydłowska N, Bunker A, Kumorek M, Jamroz D, Vattulainen I,
Nowakowska M, Rog T, Kepczynski M (2015) PEGylated liposomes as carriers of hydropho-
bic porphyrins. J Phys Chem B 119:6646–6657
Engler AC, Ke X, Gao S, Chan JM, Coady DJ, Ono RJ, Lubbers R, Nelson A, Yang YY, Hedrick
JL (2015) Hydrophilic polycarbonates: promising degradable alternatives to poly (ethylene
glycol)-based stealth materials. Macromolecules 48:1673–1678
Falvo E, Tremante E, Arcovito A, Papi M, Elad N, Bof A, Morea V, Conti G, Toffoli G, Fracasso
G (2016) Improved doxorubicin encapsulation and pharmacokinetics of ferritin–fusion protein
nanocarriers bearing proline, serine, and alanine elements. Biomacromolecules 17:514–522
Fernandes R, Mazzarello S, Stober C, Vandermeer L, Dudani S, Ibrahim MF, Majeed H, Perdrizet
K, Shorr R, Hutton BJBCR (2017) Optimal primary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis for
patients receiving docetaxel–cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for breast cancer: a systematic
review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 161:1–10
Francis G, Fisher D, Delgado C, Malik F, Gardiner A, Neale D (1998) PEGylation of cytokines and
other therapeutic proteins and peptides: the importance of biological optimisation of coupling
techniques. Int J Hematol 68:1–18
Gamucci O, Bertero A, Gagliardi M, Bardi G (2014) Biomedical nanoparticles: overview of their
surface immune-compatibility. Coatings 4:139–159
Ge Z, Xie D, Chen D, Jiang X, Zhang Y, Liu H, Liu S (2007) Stimuli-responsive double hydrophilic
block copolymer micelles with switchable catalytic activity. Macromolecules 40:3538–3546
Gheybi H, Sattari S, Bodaghi A, Soleimani K, Dadkhah A, Adeli M (2018) Polyglycerols.
Engineering of biomaterials for drug delivery systems. Elsevier
González-Aramundiz JV, Lozano MV, Sousa-Herves A, Fernandez-Megia E, Csaba N (2012)
Polypeptides and polyaminoacids in drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 9:183–201
Gu L, Faig A, Abdelhamid D, Uhrich K (2014) Sugar-based amphiphilic polymers for biomedical
applications: from nanocarriers to therapeutics. Acc Chem Res 47:2867–2877
Guillerm B, Monge S, Lapinte V, Robin JJ (2012) How to modulate the chemical structure of poly-
oxazolines by appropriate functionalization. Macromol Rapid Commun 33:1600–1612
Hadjesfandiari N, Parambath A (2018) Stealth coatings for nanoparticles: polyethylene glycol
alternatives. Engineering of biomaterials for drug delivery systems. Elsevier
Hamidi M, Azadi A, Raei P (2006) Pharmacokinetic consequences of pegylation. Drug Deliv
13:399–409
Han S, Kim C, Kwon D (1997) Thermal/oxidative degradation and stabilization of polyethylene
glycol. Polymer 38:317–323
Harari D, Kuhn N, Abramovich R, Sasson K, Zozulya AL, Smith P, Schlapschy M, Aharoni R,
Köster M, Eilam R (2014) Enhanced invivo efcacy of a type I interferon superagonist with
extended plasma half-life in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. J Biol Chem 289:29014–29029
Harris JM, Bentley MD, Moreadith RW, Viegas TX, Fang Z, Yoon K, Weimer R, Dizman B,
Nordstierna L (2019) Tuning drug release from polyoxazoline-drug conjugates. Eur Polym J
120:109241
S. Mohanta et al.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
