Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5894_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •PEGylated Nanocarriers in Medicine and Pharmacy
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Editors and Contributors
- •About the Editors
- •Contributors
- •1.1.3.1 Passive Targeting Agent
- •1.1.3.2 Solubility Enhancers
- •1. PEGylated Pharmaceutical Nanocarriers
- •1.1 PEGylation
- •1.1.1 PEG Characteristics
- •1.2 PEGylation Determination
- •1.2.2.1 Thermal Gravimetric Analysis (TGA)
- •1.2.2.2 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)
- •1.2.2.4 X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
- •1.3.1 Nanoparticulate System
- •1.3.1.1 Solid Lipid Nanoparticles
- •1.3.1.2 Nanostructured Lipid Carriers (NLCs)
- •1.3.1.3 Polymeric Nanoparticles
- •1.3.2 Metal Nanoparticles
- •1.3.2.1 Silver Nanoparticles
- •1.3.2.2 Gold Nanoparticles
- •1.3.2.3 Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles
- •1.3.2.4 Copper Nanoparticles
- •1.3.3 Vesicular Systems
- •1.3.3.1 Liposomes
- •1.3.3.2 Niosomes
- •1.3.3.3 Ethosomes
- •1.4.1 Cancer
- •1.4.2 Gene Delivery
- •1.4.3 Diagnostics Imaging
- •1.4.4 Vaccines
- •1.4.5 Rheumatoid Arthritis
- •1.4.6 Hemophilia
- •1.4.7 Pain Therapy
- •1.4.8 Diabetes
- •1.4.9 Others
- •1.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •Nanoprecipitation (Solvent Diffusion)
- •Emulsification (Solvent Evaporation or Nanoemulsion)
- •Physical Adsorption Strategy
- •2.2.2.1 Pre-Insertion PEGylation
- •2.2.2.2 Post-Insertion PEGylation
- •2.3.1 Indirect Assessment (Qualitative Assessment)
- •2.3.1.1 Particle Size
- •2.3.1.2 Zeta Potential
- •2.3.1.3 Surface Hydrophilicity
- •2.3.1.4 Microscopic Techniques
- •2.3.1.5 Fourier Transform-Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR)
- •2.3.2 Direct Assessment (Quantitative Assessment)
- •2.3.2.1 Colorimetric Methods
- •2.3.2.2 Chromatographic Methods
- •2.3.2.4 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)
- •2.3.2.5 X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Characterization Techniques
- •3.3 Infrared Spectroscopy
- •3.4 Raman Spectroscopy
- •3.5 X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
- •3.6 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
- •3.7 Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy
- •3.8 Mass Spectroscopy (MS)
- •3.9 Thermogravimetric Analysis
- •3.10 Differential Scanning Calorimetry
- •3.11 Atomic Force Microscopy
- •3.12 Scanning Electron Microscopy
- •3.13 Transmission Electron Microscopy
- •3.14 Conclusion
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.3.1 Nanoparticles PEGylation
- •4.3.2 Polyplexes (PP) PEGylation
- •4.5.1 Systemic Drug Delivery
- •4.5.2 Nonsystemic Drug Delivery
- •4.5.2.3 PEGylated Intravaginal Nanocarriers
- •4.5.2.6 Vaccines Entrapped PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •4.6.2 PEG Molecular Weight (MW)
- •4.7 PEGylated Nanocarriers Products
- •4.8.3 Disadvantageous Physicochemical Properties
- •4.8.5 Limited RES Evasion Capacity
- •4.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.1.2 PEG Solubility Characteristics
- •5.2 Water-Soluble PEGylated Small Molecule Drugs
- •5.3 Soluble PEGylated Proteins/Enzymes
- •5.3.2 Organic Solvent–Soluble PEGylated Proteins/Enzymes
- •5.4 Water-Soluble PEGylated Drug Nanocarriers
- •5.4.1 Water-Soluble PEGylated Silicon Nanocarriers
- •5.4.2 Water-Soluble PEGylated Carbon Nanotubes
- •5.4.4 Water-Soluble PEGylated Dendrimers
- •5.4.5 Water-Soluble PEGylated Polymeric Micelles
- •5.5 Hydrated or Hydrophilic PEGylated Drug Nanocarriers
- •5.5.1 Hydrated PEGylated Lipid Nanocarriers
- •5.5.2 Hydrophilic PEG-Coated Zein Nanocarriers
- •References
- •5.6.4.1 PEG Chain Length/Molecular Weight
- •6.1 Introduction
- •Increased Solubility
- •Improved Stability
- •Reduced Immunogenicity
- •Enhanced Circulation Time
- •Heterogeneity
- •6.3.1 Enhancing Immune Responses
- •6.3.2 Suppressing Immune Responses
- •6.3.3 Immune Evasion
- •6.4.1 Strategies to Overcome Immunological Barriers
- •6.4.1.1 PEGylation
- •6.4.1.2 Cell Membranes
- •6.4.1.3 Carbohydrates
- •6.4.1.4 Proteins
- •6.6.1 Cancer Therapy
- •6.6.2 Gene Therapy
- •6.6.3 Immunotherapy
- •6.6.4 Central Nervous System (CNS) Drug Delivery
- •6.6.5 Pulmonary Drug Delivery
- •6.6.6 Ocular Drug Delivery
- •6.6.7 Cardiovascular (CVS) Drug Delivery
- •6.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.3 Nanocarrier-Based Targeted Drug Delivery
- •7.4.1 Covalent Approach
- •7.4.2 Non-covalent Approach
- •7.4.2.1 PEGylation Via Monovalent Interactions
- •High-Affinity Host-Guest Interactions
- •7.4.2.2 PEGylation Via Multivalent Interactions
- •PEGylated Block Copolymers
- •PEGylated Graft Copolymers
- •Polyelectrolyte Complex-Based Systems
- •Non-ionic Interaction-Based Systems
- •PEGylated Dendritic Copolymers
- •PEGylated Copolymers Utilizing Mobile Side Groups
- •7.5 Various Targeting Strategies
- •7.5.1 Active Targeting
- •7.5.2 Passive Targeting
- •7.5.2.1 PEG Dilemma
- •7.7.1 Brain Disorders
- •7.7.2 Pulmonary Disorders
- •7.7.3 Cancer
- •7.7.4 Inflammatory Disorders
- •7.7.5 Bone Disorders
- •7.7.6 Blood Disorders
- •7.8 Stimuli-Sensitive Nanocarriers
- •7.8.1 External-Responsive Nanocarriers
- •7.8.1.1 Ultrasound-Responsive PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •7.8.1.2 Thermal-Responsive PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •7.8.1.3 Magnetic Responsive PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •7.8.2 Internal-Responsive Nanocarriers
- •7.8.2.1 pH-Responsive Systems
- •7.8.2.2 Redox-Responsive Systems
- •7.8.2.3 Enzyme-Responsive Systems
- •7.8.2.4 Hypoxia-Responsive Systems
- •7.8.3 Multimodal Responsive Nanocarriers
- •7.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.3.1 PEGylated Liposome
- •8.3.2 PEGylated Micelles
- •8.3.3 PEGylated Nanogels
- •8.3.4 PEGylated Inorganic Nanoparticles
- •8.3.5 PEGylated Polymeric Nanoparticles
- •8.4.1 Cancer
- •8.4.1.1 Breast Cancer
- •8.4.1.2 Lung Cancer
- •8.4.1.3 Colon Cancer
- •8.4.1.4 Brain Cancer
- •8.4.2 Autoimmune Diseases
- •8.4.3 Inflammatory Disorders
- •8.4.4 Cardiovascular Diseases
- •8.4.5 Ocular Diseases
- •8.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.4.1.1 Amino Acid Modifications
- •9.4.1.3 Cysteine Thiol Residue Conjugation
- •9.4.2 Releasable PEGs
- •9.7.1.1 Cationic Lipid Toxicology
- •9.8 RNA Lipid Nanoparticle
- •9.13 Conclusion
- •References
- •10.2.1 PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •10.2.1.1 Polymeric NPs
- •10.2.1.2 Liposomes
- •10.2.1.3 Dendrimers
- •10.2.1.4 Polymeric Micelles
- •10.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.1.2 Factors Influencing PPDs’ Short-Term Efficiency
- •11.2 What Is PEGylation?
- •11.3.1 Random PEGylation
- •11.3.2 Site-Specific PEGylation
- •11.3.2.1 Amine Conjugation
- •11.3.2.2 Cysteine Conjugation
- •11.4.1 Binding Affinity
- •11.4.2 Altered Biological Activity
- •11.4.3 Physicochemical Modifications
- •11.4.4 PEG Size
- •11.4.5 PEG Structure
- •11.6 PK Profiling
- •11.9 FDA-Approved PEGylated Products
- •11.11 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.1.2 Current Market Scenario
- •12.2.1 PEGylated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2.1 PEGylated Lipid-Based NPs
- •13.2.2 PEGylated Polymeric Nanoparticles
- •13.2.3 PEGylated Metal-Based Nanoparticles
- •13.2.4 Multifunctional PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •13.2.5 Targeted PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •13.3.1 Surface Modification Chemistry
- •13.3.2 Polymer Chemistry
- •13.3.4 Characterization Techniques
- •13.4.1 Longer Circulation Time
- •13.4.2 Enhanced Cellular Uptake
- •13.4.3 Controlled Drug Release
- •13.5.1 Cancer Theragnostic
- •13.5.2 Cardiovascular Theragnostic
- •13.7.2 Prolonged Circulation Time
- •13.7.3 Improved Drug Delivery
- •13.7.4 Diagnostic Functionality
- •13.8 Technical Challenges
- •13.8.4 Limited Clinical Validation
- •13.10 Conclusion
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Reversible PEGylation Strategies
- •14.2.1 Reversible PEGylation Chemistry
- •14.2.2.1 Aromatic Linkers
- •14.2.2.2 Aliphatic Linkers
- •14.2.3 Cleavage Linkers
- •14.2.3.1 Hydrolyzable Linkers
- •14.2.3.2 Enzymatically Cleavable Linkers
- •14.2.4 pH-Responsive PEGylation
- •14.2.4.1 Proteasome Inhibitor MG132
- •14.2.5 Temperature-Responsive PEGylation
- •14.2.6 Light-Responsive PEGylation
- •14.3.1 Analytical Techniques
- •Zeta Potential
- •Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography (HIC)
- •Near Infrared (NIR) Spectroscopy
- •Fourier Transform-Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR)
- •13C-NMR
- •Mass Spectrometry
- •High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
- •Calorimetry
- •X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)
- •Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)
- •TGA-DSC
- •14.3.2.1 Protein Adsorption
- •14.3.2.2 Cellular Association
- •14.3.2.5 Bioactivity Assay
- •14.3.2.6 Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
- •14.3.2.7 Sandwich ELISA
- •14.3.2.8 Anti-PEG ELISA
- •14.3.3.1 In Vivo Blood Circulation Half-Life
- •14.3.3.2 Radiolabeling
- •14.4.1 Therapeutic Applications
- •14.4.1.1 Anticancer Activity
- •14.4.1.2 Antibiotic Administration
- •14.4.1.3 Enzyme-Replacement Therapy
- •14.4.1.4 Red Blood Cell Substitution
- •14.4.1.5 Oxygen Toxicity Diseases
- •14.4.2 Pharmaceutical Applications
- •14.4.2.1 PEGylated Liposomes
- •14.4.2.2 PEGylated Proteins
- •14.4.2.3 Targeted Delivery
- •14.5.1 Design Complexity
- •14.5.3 Biological Environment Stability
- •14.5.4 Trigger Selection
- •14.5.5 Immunogenicity
- •14.5.6 Scale-up Difficulties
- •14.5.8 Cost
- •14.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •15. Stimuli-Responsive PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.2 External Stimuli-Responsive Systems
- •15.2.1 Thermoresponsive Systems
- •15.2.2 Magnetically Responsive Systems
- •15.2.3 Ultrasound-Triggered Drug Delivery
- •15.2.4 Light-Triggered Drug Delivery
- •15.2.5 Electroresponsive Systems
- •15.3 Internal Stimuli-Responsive Systems
- •15.3.1 pH-Responsive Systems
- •15.3.2 Redox-Responsive Systems
- •15.3.3 Enzyme-Responsive Systems
- •15.3.4 Self-Regulated Systems
- •15.4.3 Multistimuli Responsive Systems
- •15.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.3 PEGylated Products
- •16.3.1 PEGylated Liposomes
- •16.3.2 PEGylated G-CSF
- •16.3.3 PEGylated Proteins
- •16.3.4 PEGylated Nanoparticles
- •16.5.1 Poly(Zwitterions)
- •16.5.2 Poly(Glycerols)
- •16.5.3 Poly(Amino Acids)
- •16.5.4 Poly(Oxazolines)
- •16.5.6 Poly(Vinylpyrrolidones)
- •16.5.8 Polypeptides
- •16.5.9 Carbohydrate-Based Systems
- •16.5.10 Hydrophilic Polymers
- •16.5.11 Non-PEGylated Nanoparticles
- •16.6 Future Prospects
- •16.7 Conclusion
- •References

11 PEGylation ofTherapeutic Proteins andPeptides
11.10 Obstacles andPitfalls ofPEGylation
PEGylation has recently gained popularity as a post-production modication
technique for enhancing protein therapeutics’ biological effectiveness and
physicochemical characteristics. Given the usefulness and safety of this
approach, which several commercial medications have already demonstrated
for more than 10 years, PEGylation is anticipated to be used to modify more
potential therapeutic proteins. However, given the trend towards using branch
and high molecular weight PEGs, the non-biodegradability of PEG could
pose a signicant constraint for the subsequent generation of protein therapeutics, which are used at high concentrations and over an extended period.
Protein PEGylation has progressed from the rst to the second generation,
and current attempts to use the third generation are being made to boost efcacy. PEG polymeric size and orientation concerning protein conjugates can
signicantly change the characteristics of the resulting product. Polydispersity
value, site- specic PEGylation, and degree of PEGylation are further disadvantages. Similarly, the method primarily blocking proteolytic enzymes from
destroying PEGylated protein can prevent a substrate from accessing the protein’s active site. Hence, active-site protective agents are utilized to avoid such
troubles and other issues. However, PEGylation can still occur close to the
protected region.
PEGylation therapy has adversely affected patients by entering the vasculature, resulting in dermatitis, mucositis, and hands and foot syndrome (HFS)
(Najem etal. 2014). Additional disadvantages have been reported in biotechnology and nanomedicine systems, wherein receptor interaction is reduced
because of the steric hindrance provided by the disordered PEG chain. In
invivo trials, enzymes like alcohol dehydrogenase and cytochrome P450 can
gradually shorten the chain length. The 40kDa branched PEG version is currently the greatest PEG molecular weight used for protein conjugation.
Due to the PEGylation PPDs improved bioavailability, thermal and physical stability, decreased immunogenicity, increased half-lives, and optimized
pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, these compounds
have shown promise in the eld of biomedicine (Schellekens et al. 2013).
However, the extensive usage of PEGylation is somewhat constrained due to
anti-PEG, vacuoles associated with PEGs, and other drawbacks. On the other
hand, this approach should be applied more frequently and appropriately. To
address these issues, we must rst investigate the various modied process
parameters for multiple PEGs to determine the ideal level of modication and
the nal product’s molecular weight (Zhang etal. 2014a).
337
11.11 Conclusion
Many facets of PEGylation technology have been discussed in this review.
They include the creation of PEG reagents, PEGylation processes, purications, and studying PEG–protein conjugates. PEGylation is an established and

338
N. Akojwar et al.
tried technology that has already produced various FDA-approved medicines,
attesting to its viability and safety. Since its inception, PEGylation has mostly been
utilized to control the life cycles of already-existing therapeutic proteins. Since
every protein is unique, each PEG moiety must be tailored individually to the
desired therapeutic molecule. The impact on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic qualities depends heavily on the length and form of each PEG moiety. In
addition, homogeneity and pyrogenicity requirements for pegylated drugs must be
met, and activation and binding methods must be repeatable. Notwithstanding these
difculties, methods for PEGylating proteins and peptides have greatly improved
recently. In the near future, we may anticipate and sincerely hope that the numerous
studies conducted by academic and commercial researchers will successfully
address the issues with PEG-small drug conjugates, allowing the introduction of
these novel products to the market as well.
Acknowledgments The author, RKT, acknowledges the Department of Pharmaceuticals,
Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, India, for supporting the drug discovery and formulation
research at NIPER Ahmedabad. RKT also acknowledges the Department of Science and
Technology, Government of India, for a Core Research Grant funding (File No. CRG/2021/005402)
and also acknowledges the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, for the grant
File Id: 2021-14161 and grant File Id: IIRP-2023-4849/F1 for supporting research in RKT lab.
References
Alconcel SNS, Baas AS, Maynard HD (2011) Fda-approved poly(ethylene glycol)–protein conju-
gate drugs. Polym Chem 2:1442–1448
Alqahtani AD, O'connor D, Domling A, Goda SK (2019) Strategies for the production of long-
acting therapeutics and efcient drug delivery for cancer treatment. Biomed Pharmacother
113:108750
Awwad S, Ginn C, Brocchini S (2018) The case for protein Pegylation. Woodhead
Publishing, London
Bailon P, Won CY (2009) Peg-modied biopharmaceuticals. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 6:1–16
Baumann A, Tuerck D, Prabhu S, Dickmann L, Sims J (2014) Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and
distribution of Pegs and Pegylated proteins: quo Vadis? Drug Discov Today 19:1623–1631
Belén LH, Rangel-Yagui CDO, Beltrán Lissabet JF, Effer B, Lee-Estevez M, Pessoa A, Castillo
RL, Farías JG (2019) From synthesis to characterization of site-selective pegylated proteins.
Front Pharmacol 10:1
Bender C, Maese L, Carter-Febres M, Verma A (2021) Clinical utility of Pegaspargase in chil-
dren, adolescents and young adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a review. Blood
Lymphat Cancer 11:25–40
Beranová M, Wasserbauer R, Vancurová D, Stifter M, Ocenásková J, Mára M (1990) Effect of
cytochrome P-450 inhibition and stimulation on intensity of polyethylene degradation in
microsomal fraction of mouse and rat livers. Biomaterials 11:521–524
Bliss M (1982) Banting's, Best's, and Collip's accounts of the discovery of insulin. Bull Hist Med
56:554–568
Bruno BJ, Miller GD, Lim CS (2013) Basics and recent advances in peptide and protein drug
delivery. Ther Deliv 4:1443–1467
Byrne SA, Bedding MJ, Corcilius L, Ford DJ, Zhong Y, Franck C, Larance M, Mackay JP, Payne
RJ (2021) Late-stage modication of peptides and proteins at cysteine with Diaryliodonium
salts. Chem Sci 12:14159–14166

11 PEGylation ofTherapeutic Proteins andPeptides
Caliceti P, Veronese FM (2003) Pharmacokinetic and biodistribution properties of poly(ethylene
glycol)-protein conjugates. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 55:1261–1277
Cao S-J, Lv Z-Q, Guo S, Jiang G-P, Liu H-L (2020) An update—prolonging the action of protein
and peptide drugs. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 61:102124
Carbonaro-Sarracino DA, Chun K, Clark DN, Kaufman ML, Jin X, Wang X, Kohn DB (2021)
Gene delivery using Aav8 invivo for disease stabilization in a bimodal gene therapy approach
for the treatment of Ada-decient Scid. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev 20:765–778
Caserman S, Kusterle M, Kunstelj M, Milunović T, Schiefermeier M, Jevsevar S, Porekar VG
(2009) Correlations between invitro potency of polyethylene glycol-protein conjugates and
their chromatographic behavior. Anal Biochem 389:27–31
Cheetham AG, Keith D, Zhang P, Lin R, Su H, Cui H (2016) Targeting tumors with small molecule
peptides. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 16:489–508
Chen G, Kang W, Li W, Chen S, Gao Y (2022) Oral delivery of protein and peptide drugs: from
non-specic formulation approaches to intestinal cell targeting strategies. Theranostics
12:1419–1439
Cheng F, Yang J, Schwaneberg U, Zhu L (2019) Rational surface engineering of an arginine
deiminase (an antitumor enzyme) for increased Pegylation efciency. Biotechnol Bioeng
116:2156–2166
Cornes P, Gascon P, Vulto AG, Aapro M (2020) Biosimilar Peglgrastim: improving access and
Optimising practice to supportive care that enables cure. BioDrugs 34:255–263
Craik DJ, Fairlie DP, Liras S, Price D (2013) The future of peptide-based drugs. Chem Biol Drug
Des 81:136–147
Davenport AP, Scully CCG, De Graaf C, Brown AJH, Maguire JJ (2020) Advances in therapeutic
peptides targeting G protein-coupled receptors. Nat Rev Drug Discov 19:389–413
Defrees S, Wang ZG, Xing R, Scott AE, Wang J, Zopf D, Gouty DL, Sjoberg ER, Panneerselvam
K, Brinkman-Van Der Linden EC, Bayer RJ, Tarp MA, Clausen H (2006) Glycopegylation
of recombinant therapeutic proteins produced in Escherichia Coli. Glycobiology 16:833–843
Delgado C, Francis GE, Fisher D (1992) The uses and properties of peg-linked proteins. Crit Rev
Ther Drug Carrier Syst 9:249–304
Dimitrov DS (2012) Therapeutic proteins. Methods Mol Biol 899:1–26
Dozier JK, Distefano MD (2015) Site-specic Pegylation of therapeutic proteins. Int J Mol Sci
16:25831–25864
Ezban M, Hansen M, Kjalke M (2020) An overview of Turoctocog alfa Pegol (N8-Gp; Esperoct(®)
) assay performance: implications for Postadministration monitoring. Haemophilia 26:156–163
Fee CJ (2007) Size comparison between proteins Pegylated with branched and linear poly(ethylene
glycol) molecules. Biotechnol Bioeng 98:725–731
Fee CJ, Van Alstine JM (2006) Peg-proteins: reaction engineering and separation issues. Chem
Eng Sci 61:924–939
Filpula D, Zhao H (2008) Releasable Pegylation of proteins with customized linkers. Adv Drug
Deliv Rev 60:29–49
Finck B, Tang H, Civoli F, Hodge J, O'kelly H, Vexler V (2020) Pharmacokinetic and
Pharmacodynamic equivalence of Peglgrastim-Cbqv and Peglgrastim in healthy subjects.
Adv Ther 37:4291–4307
Fishburn CS (2008) The pharmacology of Pegylation: balancing Pd with Pk to generate novel
therapeutics. J Pharm Sci 97:4167–4183
Fontaine SD, Reid R, Robinson L, Ashley GW, Santi DV (2015) Long-term stabilization of
Maleimide-thiol conjugates. Bioconjug Chem 26:145–152
Fontana A, Spolaore B, Mero A, Veronese FM (2008) Site-specic modication and Pegylation of
pharmaceutical proteins mediated by transglutaminase. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 60:13–28
Fu K, March K, Alexaki A, Fabozzi G, Moysi E, Petrovas C (2020) Immunogenicity of protein
therapeutics: a lymph node perspective. Front Immunol 11:11
Gaertner HF, Offord RE (1996) Site-specic attachment of functionalized poly(ethylene glycol) to
the amino terminus of proteins. Bioconjug Chem 7:38–44
339

340
Greish K (2007) Enhanced permeability and retention of macromolecular drugs in solid tumors: a
Royal Gate for Targeted Anticancer Nanomedicines. J Drug Target 15:457–464
Gunnoo SB, Madder A (2016) Chemical protein modication through cysteine. Chembiochem
17:529–553
Gupta V, Sengupta M, Prakash J, Tripathy BC (2016) Production of recombinant pharmaceuti-
cal proteins. In: Basic and applied aspects of biotechnology. Springer, Singapore, pp77–101.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 981- 10- 0875- 7_4
Gupta V, Bhavanasi S, Quadir M, Singh K, Ghosh G, Vasamreddy K, Ghosh A, Siahaan TJ,
Banerjee S, Banerjee SK (2019) Protein Pegylation for cancer therapy: bench to bedside. J Cell
Commun Signal 13:319–330
Hamidi M, Azadi A, Raei P (2006) Pharmacokinetic consequences of Pegylation. Drug Deliv
13:399–409
Han Y, Gao Z, Chen L, Kang L, Huang W, Jin M, Wang Q, Bae YH (2019) Multifunctional Oral
delivery systems for enhanced bioavailability of therapeutic peptides/proteins. Acta Pharm Sin
B 9:902–922
Harris JM, Chess RB (2003) Effect of Pegylation on pharmaceuticals. Nat Rev Drug Discov
2:214–221
Harris JM, Martin NE, Modi M (2001) Pegylation: a novel process for modifying pharmacokinet-
ics. Clin Pharmacokinet 40:539–551
Henninot A, Collins JC, Nuss JM (2018) The current state of peptide drug discovery: Back to the
future? J Med Chem 61:1382–1414
Humphreys SZ, Geller RB, Walden P (2022) Peglgrastim Biosimilars in us supportive oncology:
a narrative review of administration options and economic considerations to maximize patient
benet. Oncol Ther 10:351–361
Ibeanu N, Egbu R, Onyekuru L, Javaheri H, Khaw PT, Williams GR, Brocchini S, Awwad S (2020)
Injectables and depots to prolong drug action of proteins and peptides. Pharmaceutics 12:999
Jevsevar S, Kunstelj M, Porekar VG (2010) Pegylation of therapeutic proteins. Biotechnol J
5:113–128
Jones MW, Mantovani G, Blindauer CA, Ryan SM, Wang X, Brayden DJ, Haddleton DM (2012)
Direct peptide bioconjugation/Pegylation at tyrosine with linear and branched polymeric
Diazonium salts. J Am Chem Soc 134:7406–7413
Joseph M, Trinh H, Mitra A (2017) Peptide and protein-based therapeutic agents. Elsevier,
Amsterdam
Kemptner J, Marchetti-Deschmann M, Siekmann J, Turecek PL, Schwarz HP, Allmaier G (2010)
Gemma and Maldi-Tof Ms of reactive Pegs for pharmaceutical applications. J Pharm Biomed
Anal 52:432–437
Knop K, Hoogenboom R, Fischer D, Schubert US (2010) Poly(ethylene glycol) in drug delivery:
pros and cons as well as potential alternatives. Angew Chemie Int Ed 49:6288–6308
Kolate A, Baradia D, Patil S, Vhora I, Kore G, Misra A (2014) Peg—a versatile conjugating ligand
for drugs and drug delivery systems. J Control Release 192:67–81
Kozma GT, Shimizu T, Ishida T, Szebeni J (2020) Anti-peg antibodies: properties, formation, test-
ing and role in adverse immune reactions to Pegylated Nano-biopharmaceuticals. Adv Drug
Deliv Rev 154-155:163–175
Kunstelj M, Fidler K, Skrajnar S, Kenig M, Smilović V, Kusterle M, Caserman S, Zore I, Porekar
VG, Jevševar S (2013) Cysteine-specic Pegylation of Rhg-Csf via Selenylsulde bond.
Bioconjug Chem 24:889–896
Kursa M, Walker GF, Roessler V, Ogris M, Roedl W, Kircheis R, Wagner E (2003) Novel shielded
transferrin-polyethylene glycol-Polyethylenimine/Dna complexes for systemic tumor-targeted
gene transfer. Bioconjug Chem 14:222–231
Lagassé HA, Alexaki A, Simhadri VL, Katagiri NH, Jankowski W, Sauna ZE, Kimchi-Sarfaty C
(2017) Recent advances in (therapeutic protein) drug development. F1000res 6:113
Lau JL, Dunn MK (2018) Therapeutic peptides: historical perspectives, current development
trends, and future directions. Bioorg Med Chem 26:2700–2707
N. Akojwar et al.

11 PEGylation ofTherapeutic Proteins andPeptides
Lee AC-L, Harris JL, Khanna KK, Hong J-H (2019) A comprehensive review on current advances
in peptide drug development and design. Int J Mol Sci 20:2383
Li CM, Haratipour P, Lingeman RG, Perry JJP, Gu L, Hickey RJ, Malkas LH (2021) Novel peptide
therapeutic approaches for cancer treatment. Cells 10:2908
Maiser B, Dismer F, Hubbuch J (2014) Optimization of random pegylation reactions by means of
high throughput screening. Biotechnol Bioeng 111:104–114
Manandhar M, Chun E, Romesberg FE (2021) Genetic code expansion: inception, development,
commercialization. J Am Chem Soc 143:4859–4878
Maniatis AK, Casella SJ, Nadgir UM, Hofman PL, Saenger P, Chertock ED, Aghajanova EM,
Korpal-Szczyrska M, Vlachopapadopoulou E, Malievskiy O, Chaychenko T, Cappa M,
Song W, Mao M, Mygind PH, Smith AR, Chessler SD, Komirenko AS, Beckert M, Shu AD,
Thornton PS (2022) Safety and efcacy of Lonapegsomatropin in children with growth hor-
mone deciency: enlighten trial 2-year results. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 107:E2680–E2689
Mero A, Spolaore B, Veronese FM, Fontana A (2009) Transglutaminase-mediated Pegylation of
proteins: direct identication of the sites of protein modication by mass spectrometry using a
novel monodisperse peg. Bioconjug Chem 20:384–389
Milla P, Dosio F, Cattel L (2012) Pegylation of proteins and liposomes: a powerful and exible
strategy to improve the drug delivery. Curr Drug Metab 13:105–119
Monfardini C, Schiavon O, Caliceti P, Morpurgo M, Harris JM, Veronese FM (1995) A branched
Monomethoxypoly(ethylene glycol) for protein modication. Bioconjug Chem 6:62–69
Morpurgo M, Veronese FM, Kachensky D, Harris JM (1996) Preparation of characterization of
poly(ethylene glycol) vinyl sulfone. Bioconjug Chem 7:363–368
Najem A, Deregnaucourt D, Ramdane S, Dridba M, Djouba F, Vercambre-Darras S (2014)
Intertrigo-like dermatitis with Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin: diagnosis and management.
J Clin Oncol 32:E104–E106
Ng EW, Shima DT, Calias P, Cunningham ET Jr, Guyer DR, Adamis AP (2006) Pegaptanib, a
targeted anti-Vegf aptamer for ocular vascular disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5:123–132
Nguyen GK, Kam A, Loo S, Jansson AE, Pan LX, Tam JP (2015) Butelase 1: a versatile ligase for
peptide and protein macrocyclization. J Am Chem Soc 137:15398–15401
Okikiolu J, Woodley C, Cadman-Davies L, O'sullivan J, Radia D, Garcia NC, Harrington P,
Kordasti S, Asirvatham S, Sriskandarajah P, Saunders J, Saha C, Sanchez I, Delavallade H,
Mclornan DP, Harrison CN (2023) Real world experience with Ropeginterferon alpha-2b
(Besremi) in essential Thrombocythaemia and Polycythaemia Vera following exposure to
Pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys). Leuk Res Rep 19:100360
Panda S, Singh PK, Mishra S, Mitra S, Pattnaik P, Adhikary SD, Mohapatra RK (2023) Indian
Biosimilars and vaccines at crossroads-replicating the success of Pharmagenerics. Vaccines
(Basel) 11:110
Pasut G, Veronese FM (2006) Pegylation of proteins as tailored chemistry for optimized bioconju-
gates. In: Satchi-Fainaro R, Duncan R (eds) Polymer therapeutics I.Springer, Berlin
Patrawala M, Kuruvilla M, Li H (2020) Successful desensitization of Pegvaliase (Palynziq®) in a
patient with phenylketonuria. Mol Genet Metab Rep 23:100575
Pettit DK, Bonnert TP, Eisenman J, Srinivasan S, Paxton R, Beers C, Lynch D, Miller B, Yost J,
Grabstein KH, Gombotz WR (1997) Structure-function studies of interleukin 15 using site-
specic mutagenesis, polyethylene glycol conjugation, and homology modeling. J Biol Chem
272:2312–2318
Plesner B, Fee CJ, Westh P, Nielsen AD (2011) Effects of peg size on structure, function and stabil-
ity of Pegylated Bsa. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 79:399–405
Qi Y, Chilkoti A (2015) Protein-polymer conjugation-moving beyond Pegylation. Curr Opin Chem
Biol 28:181–193
Rudmann DG, Alston JT, Hanson JC, Heidel S (2013) High molecular weight polyethylene glycol
cellular distribution and peg-associated cytoplasmic Vacuolation is molecular weight depen-
dent and does not require conjugation to proteins. Toxicol Pathol 41:970–983
Sato H (2002) Enzymatic procedure for site-specic Pegylation of proteins. Adv Drug Deliv Rev
54:487–504
341

342
Schellekens H, Hennink WE, Brinks V (2013) The immunogenicity of polyethylene glycol: facts
and ction. Pharm Res 30:1729–1734
Schreiber S (2011) Certolizumab Pegol for the treatment of Crohn's disease. Ther Adv Gastroenterol
4:375–389
Schwartzberg LS, Bhat G, Peguero J, Agajanian R, Bharadwaj JS, Restrepo A, Hlalah O, Mehmi
I, Chawla S, Hasal SJ, Yang Z, Cobb PW (2020) Eapegrastim, a long-acting granulocyte-
Colony stimulating factor for the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: results
of a phase iii trial. Oncologist 25:E1233–E1241
Seif S, Planz V, Windbergs M (2017) Delivery of therapeutic proteins using electrospun bers-
recent developments and current challenges. Arch Pharm (Weinheim) 350:1700077
Selby C, Peyton-Thomas B, Eslami P (2021) Peglgrastim Biosimilars: where are we now? J Adv
Pract Oncol 12:541–547
Shah S, Chamlagain R, Musalman ZH, Raj Adhikari Y, Chhetri S, Paudel S, Gundabolu K, Dhakal
P (2022) Pegcetacoplan in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: a systematic review on ef-
cacy and safety. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 6:E12781
Sriram K, Insel PA (2018) G protein-coupled receptors as targets for approved drugs: how many
targets and how many drugs? Mol Pharmacol 93:251–258
Sugiuchi H, Uji Y, Okabe H, Irie T, Uekama K, Kayahara N, Miyauchi K (1995) Direct mea-
surement of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in serum with polyethylene glycol-modied
enzymes and sulfated alpha-Cyclodextrin. Clin Chem 41:717–723
Swierczewska M, Lee KC, Lee S (2015) What is the future of Pegylated therapies? Expert Opin
Emerg Drugs 20:531–536
Szijj PA, Kostadinova KA, Spears RJ, Chudasama V (2020) Tyrosine bioconjugation—an emer-
gent alternative. Org Biomol Chem 18:9018–9028
Szlachcic A, Zakrzewska M, Otlewski J (2011) Longer action means better drug: tuning up protein
therapeutics. Biotechnol Adv 29:436–441
Tagawa H, Maruyama K, Sasaki K, Konoue N, Kishimura A, Kanai M, Mori T, Oisaki K, Katayama
Y (2020) Induction of Adcc By A folic acid–mab conjugate prepared by tryptophan-selective
reaction toward folate-receptor-positive cancer cells. RSC Adv 10:16727–16731
Tilley SD, Francis MB (2006) Tyrosine-selective protein alkylation using pi-Allylpalladium com-
plexes. J Am Chem Soc 128:1080–1081
Turecek PL, Bossard MJ, Schoetens F, Ivens IA (2016) Pegylation of biopharmaceuticals: a review
of chemistry and nonclinical safety information of approved drugs. J Pharm Sci 105:460–475
Vargason AM, Anselmo AC, Mitragotri S (2021) The evolution of commercial drug delivery tech-
nologies. Nat Biomed Eng 5:951–967
Veronese FM (2001) Peptide and protein Pegylation: a review of problems and solutions.
Biomaterials 22:405–417
Veronese FM, Mero A (2008) The impact of Pegylation on biological therapies. BioDrugs
22:315–329
Veronese FM, Caliceti P, Schiavon O (1997) Branched and linear poly(ethylene glycol): inuence
of the polymer structure on enzymological , pharmacokinetic, and immunological properties of
protein conjugates. J Bioact Compat Polym 12:196–207
Villegas MR, Baeza A, Vallet-Regí M (2018) Nanotechnological strategies for protein delivery.
Molecules 23:1008
Wang L, Zhou W, Wang Q, Xu C, Tang Q, Yang H (2018) An injectable, dual responsive,
and self-healing hydrogel based on oxidized sodium alginate and hydrazide-modied
poly(Ethyleneglycol). Molecules 23:546
Wang J, Deng T, Liu Y, Chen K, Yang Z, Jiang ZX (2020a) Monodisperse and Polydisperse
Pegylation of peptides and proteins: a comparative study. Biomacromolecules 21:3134–3139
Wang T, Guo Y, He Y, Ren T, Yin L, Fawcett JP, Gu J, Sun H (2020b) Impact of molecular weight
on the mechanism of cellular uptake of polyethylene glycols (Pegs) with particular reference to
P-glycoprotein. Acta Pharm Sin B 10:2002–2009
N. Akojwar et al.

11 PEGylation ofTherapeutic Proteins andPeptides
Warren K, Bent R, Wolters PL, Prager A, Hanson R, Packer R, Shih J, Camphausen K (2012) A
phase 2 study of Pegylated interferon Α-2b (peg-intron(®)) in children with diffuse intrinsic
pontine glioma. Cancer 118:3607–3613
Webster R, Elliott V, Park BK, Walker D, Hankin M, Taupin P (2009) Peg and peg conjugates
toxicity: towards an understanding of the toxicity of peg and its relevance to Pegylated bio-
logicals. In: Veronese FM (ed) Pegylated protein drugs: basic science and clinical applications.
Birkhäuser, Basel
Webster J, Scott J, Smith H, Wieland D, Donaldson J, Catasus C, Smith R (2020) Udenyca has
equivalent efcacy to the Peglgrastim originator in breast cancer patients receiving highly
Myelosuppressive chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 38:E19273–E19273
Weeks AM, Wells JA (2020) Subtiligase-catalyzed peptide ligation. Chem Rev 120:3127–3160
Witt KA, Huber JD, Egleton RD, Roberts MJ, Bentley MD, Guo L, Wei H, Yamamura HI, Davis
TP (2001) Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characterization of poly(ethylene glycol)
conjugation to met-Enkephalin analog [D-Pen2, D-Pen5]-Enkephalin (Dpdpe). J Pharmacol
Exp Ther 298:848–856
Xu L, Kuan SL, Weil T (2021) Contemporary approaches for site-selective dual functionalization
of proteins. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 60:13757–13777
Yang J, Liu R, Granghaud A, Zaidi O, Stephens J (2021) Biosimilar Peglgrastim may offer
affordable treatment options for patients in France: a budget impact analysis on the basis of
clinical trial and real-world data. J Med Econ 24:665–674
Yoshimoto N, Yamamoto S (2012) Pegylated protein separations: challenges and opportunities.
Biotechnol J 7:592–593
Yowell SL, Blackwell S (2002) Novel effects with polyethylene glycol modied pharmaceuticals.
Cancer Treat Rev 28 Suppl A:3–6
Zalipsky S (1995) Functionalized poly(ethylene glycols) for preparation of biologically relevant
conjugates. Bioconjug Chem 6:150–165
Zalipsky S, Seltzer R, Menon-Rudolph S (1992) Evaluation of a new reagent for covalent attach-
ment of polyethylene glycol to proteins. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 15:100–114
Zhang J, Zhao Y, Su Z, Ma G-H (2007) Synthesis of Monomethoxy poly(ethylene glycol) without
diol poly(ethylene glycol). J Appl Polym Sci 105:3782–3786
Zhang F, Liu MR, Wan HT (2014a) Discussion about several potential drawbacks of Pegylated
therapeutic proteins. Biol Pharm Bull 37:335–339
Zhang H, Wilson J, Zhang J, Luo Y (2014b) Characterization of potential degradation products in
a Pegylating reagent 20 Kda Monomethoxy polyethylene glycol Propionaldehyde by Rp-Hplc,
Apci-Ms and Nmr. J Pharm Biomed Anal 89:221–226
Zuma LK, Gasa NL, Makhoba XH, Pooe OJ (2022) Protein Pegylation: navigating recombinant
protein stability, aggregation, and bioactivity. Biomed Res Int 2022:8929715
343


PEGylated Nanocarriers forDiagnostic
Applications
NaveenGupta, AnkitMishra , PranKishoreDeb,
andMuktikaTekade
Abstract
Polyethylene glycol, due to its “stealth” characteristics and biocompatibility, is
frequently used in the administration of drugs and nanomaterials. PEGylation
enables biomaterials and particle delivery systems to circumvent the immune
system and extend circulation lifetimes. To diagnose various diseases, substan-
tial attempts are being made to create alternative imaging techniques that can
improve the signal or produce high positive contrast for effective molecular
imaging. The development of PEGylated nanoparticles as contrast agents in
imaging technology has made it possible to gain precise cellular and molecular
imaging, detect drug delivery, particularly to tumoral areas, and provide informa-
tion for adequate surgical excision of solid tumors. PEGylated nanocarriers have
been identied as potential candidates for the targeted treatment and imaging of
malignant tumors. Peptides or antibodies can be conjugated to the surface of
PEGylated nanocarriers to directly target tumor cells and potentially impair their
12
N. Gupta (*)
Patel Institute of Pharmacy, Madhyanchal Professional University,
Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
A. Mishra
Department of Pharmaceutics, VNS Group of Institutions, Faculty of Pharmacy, Bhopal,
Madhya Pradesh, India
P. K. Deb
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technology, Birla Institute of Technology (BIT),
Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
M. Tekade
School of Pharmacy, Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya, Takshila Campus,
Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India
345

346
N. Gupta et al.
active signaling pathways. They improve magnetic resonance imaging contrast,
helping physicians to track anatomical, physiological, and molecular changes in
a disease as treatment progresses. PEGylated nanocarriers are effective imaging
tools for tumor diagnosis, follow-up, and disease monitoring, which help in the
overall clinical management of tumors.
Keywords
PEGylation · PEGylated · Nano carriers · Diagnostic · Imaging
12.1 Introduction
Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is an aqueous, safe, and biocompatible polymer approved
by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). PEG generally nds applications in
intravenous, oral, and dermal delivery routes for human use. PEG with high molecular weight are viscous and colorless liquids, and larger molecular weight PEGs are
waxy liquids. They are miscible with glycols, soluble in water, alcohol, acetone, and
chloroform, and insoluble in ether. Due to its purported “stealth” qualities and biocompatibility, PEG is frequently used in pharmaceutical delivery systems. PEG has
demonstrated promise in delaying renal clearance and extending circulation lives.
The prevailing consensus is that PEGylation enables biomaterials and particulate
delivery systems to avoid the immune system by extending circulation lifetimes.
The process by which PEGylation prolongs circulation durations is widely thought
to include a considerable reduction in opsonization, which accounts for its “stealth”
behavior.
Studies have examined reduced protein binding to nanoparticles containing
PEGylated components and associated the amount of protein adsorption (as a measure of opsonization) with half-life in the distribution, both of which agree with this
theory. In fact, PEG is believed to conceal surface charge on nanoparticles (as can
be observed by a near-neutral zeta potential) and form a hydrophilic barrier that
sterically inhibits protein adsorption. Numerous invitro studies have clearly shown
that PEGylation can reduce macrophage absorption, and it is hypothesized that this
effect is the one that allows PEG to lengthen circulation durations invivo (Verhoef
and Anchordoquy 2013).
A drug delivery system must be in the bloodstream for sufcient time to reach
the target region. Through the reticuloendothelial system (RES), plasma proteins
known as opsonins can bind circulating drug delivery devices, namely nanocarriers,
and eliminate them from circulation in seconds to minutes. Giving these drug delivery systems a stealth shielding on their surface stops opsonins from identifying
these particles, restricting phagocytosis by the RES cells and extending the time it
takes for blood to circulate throughout the body from minutes to hours or days, as
represented in Fig.12.1. To achieve such stealth-shielding and long-circulation of
pharmaceuticals or delivery devices, polyethylene glycol modication has arisen as
a frequent tactic. PEG is also called polyethylene oxide (PEO) when the molecular
weight is larger than 20kDa. PEGylation term is used to describe the covalent
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
