Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5894_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
19 Мб
Скачать
6 PEGylation asaTool toAlter Immunological Properties ofNanocarriers
177
ultimately reduces the immune recognition of such molecules, thereby signicantly reducing their immunogenicity (Shi etal. 2022).
Enhanced Circulation Time
PEGylation can increase the overall circulation time of the proteins or drugs upon administration. PEGylation increases the overall molecular weight of the proteins or drugs, which reduces their renal clearance (Du etal. 2020). Reduced renal clearance coupled with declined immune recognition owing to PEGylation combined enhances the circulation time of the PEGylated molecules.
6.2.3.2 Disadvantages ofPEGylation
Despite all the lucrative advantages that the technique of PEGylation offers, it still presents some disadvantages. Careful consideration and thorough examination of these disadvantages are recommended while adapting the strategic PEGylation approach for proteins, peptides, and drugs of interest. A few leading disadvantages of PEGylation are mentioned in following section.
Heterogeneity
PEGylation is a complex process necessitating the careful monitoring of various process parameters such as reaction temperature, reaction time, molecular weight of PEG, and pH.PEGylation reactions are time-consuming and involve forming het­erogeneous nal products over a monosubstituted product. This further makes the downstream processing cumbersome and increases the cost of production. Non­specic coupling reactions usually lead to the formation of heterogeneous products. However, this can be minimized by site-specic PEGylation of proteins and pep­tides, which specically carries out PEGylation at the particular amino acid residue of the protein or peptide under consideration.
Risk ofImmune Response
Although PEG is generally considered safe for human use, some individuals may develop an immune response to PEGylated molecules, leading to allergic reactions or other adverse effects. Multiple reports have suggested the formation of immedi­ate and delayed anti-PEG antibodies in individuals after exposure to PEG.De Groot etal. have reported instances of anaphylactic shock with a marketed PEGylated contrast agent (De Groot etal. 2004). The cases of urticaria are also reported by Perez et al. using polysorbate 80, a PEG-containing polymer (Pérez-Pérez etal. 2011).
Alteration ofBiological Activity
PEGylation can alter the biological activity of a molecule, either positively or nega­tively, depending on the specic application. The steric hindrance created by PEG may interfere with the interaction of the PEGylated molecules and their target, thereby reducing the desired pharmacological response. The drugs or proteins requiring cellular internalization to demonstrate their pharmacological activity may suffer signicantly due to PEGylation. This effect can be prominently observed in
178
A. Tiwari et al.
the case of PEGylated enzymes, wherein the interaction between the therapeutic enzyme and the substrate is severely affected due to PEGylation.
Overall, PEGylation is a valuable tool for modifying the properties of molecules for various applications. However, the advantages and disadvantages of PEGylation should be carefully considered, along with other factors, such as the specic appli­cation, target molecule, and regulatory requirements.
6.3 Immunological Properties ofNanocarriers
Nanocarriers are engineered structures that are used to deliver drugs, genes, or other therapeutic agents to specic sites in the body. While nanocarriers have shown great promise as drug-delivery vehicles, they can also have immunological properties that must be carefully considered. To understand the immune response to the externally administered nanocarriers, it is essential rst to understand the immune system. The immune system is a complex network of cells, tissues, and organs that protect the body against pathogens and foreign substances. It is responsible for identifying and eliminating harmful invaders while maintaining tolerance to self-antigens (Chaplin
2010). The immune system can be divided into two main parts—the innate immune
system and the adaptive immune system. The innate immune system is the rst line of defense against invading pathogens. It includes physical barriers, such as the skin and mucous membranes, as well as cellular components, such as phagocytic cells (e.g., macrophages and neutrophils) and natural killer (NK) cells. These cells can recognize and eliminate foreign invaders through non-specic mechanisms, such as phagocytosis, cytokine production, and complement activation (Anaya etal. 2013).
The adaptive immune system is a more specialized and targeted response that develops over time in response to specic pathogens. It includes B, T, and antigen­presenting cells (APCs). B cells produce antibodies that specically recognize and neutralize foreign antigens, while T cells recognize and destroy infected or abnor­mal cells. APCs, such as dendritic cells and macrophages, present antigens to T cells to initiate an immune response (Den Haan etal. 2014). The humoral immunity and cell-mediated immunity are two branches of adaptive immunity. Humoral immunity involves the production of antibodies by B cells, which can neutralize pathogens in the bloodstream or other extracellular spaces.
In contrast, cell-mediated immunity consists of activating T cells, which can destroy infected or abnormal cells. The immune system can also remember previous exposure to pathogens, allowing for a faster and more efcient response upon sub­sequent encounters. This is the basis for vaccination, which involves the introduc­tion of a non-pathogenic form of a pathogen to elicit an immune response and establish memory (Cooper and Eleftherianos 2017).
Depending on the therapeutic application, nanocarriers can play an essential role in modulating the immune response, either by enhancing or by suppressing immune responses. The immune response to nanocarriers can depend on several factors, including their size, shape, surface chemistry, and cargo.
6 PEGylation asaTool toAlter Immunological Properties ofNanocarriers
179

6.3.1 Enhancing Immune Responses

Nanocarriers can be designed to enhance immune responses by delivering antigens, adjuvants, or immunomodulatory agents to antigen-presenting cells (APCs), such as dendritic cells and macrophages. This can activate T and B cells, generating an adaptive immune response against infectious diseases or cancer. For example, nano­carriers can be used as a platform for cancer vaccines to deliver tumor-associated antigens and adjuvants to APCs, which can enhance the immune response to cancer. Castro et al. developed chitosan/poly(γ-glutamic acid) nanoparticles (Ch/γ-PGA NPs) to modulate the inammatory prole of macrophages and dendritic cells to impair their ability to promote cancer evasion (Castro etal. 2017). Ch/γ-PGA NPs demonstrated the development of immunostimulatory phenotype of dendritic cells, thereby enhancing the expression of co-stimulatory molecules such as CD86, CD40 and secretion of pro-inammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-12p40, and TNF-α. Ch/γ-PGA NPs also promoted the macrophages to a pro-inammatory prole, decreasing the expression of CD163. These developments observed using Ch/γ- PGA NPs inhibited the antigen-presenting cells’ ability to invade colorectal cancer.

6.3.2 Suppressing Immune Responses

Nanocarriers can also be designed to suppress immune responses, such as treating autoimmune diseases or transplant rejection. This can be achieved by delivering immunosuppressive agents, such as siRNA or small molecule drugs, to immune cells, such as T cells or dendritic cells, which can reduce their activation and prolif­eration. Tang etal. developed PEG-b-poly(,-lactide-co-glycolide) (PEG-PLGA) nanoparticles and encapsulated cyclosporine A (CsA) into them (Tang etal. 2012). T-cell assay was performed to assess the suppression of T-cell proliferation and production of inammatory cytokines. Both free CsA and CsA encapsulated PEG­PLGA NPs demonstrated dose-dependent production of inammatory cytokines and suppression of T-cell proliferation. The release kinetics of CsA from CsA encapsulated PEG-PLGA NPs (55.6% release on day 1) suggested their ability to maintain the therapeutic concentration of CsA invivo. This PEGylated NP-based delivery system for the delivery of immunosuppressive drugs presents the potential application of PEGylated techniques for the targeted delivery of immunosuppres­sive drugs.

6.3.3 Immune Evasion

Nanocarriers can also be designed to evade the immune system by using stealth coatings, such as PEG, or by mimicking the properties of natural cells, such as erythrocytes or platelets. This can increase the circulation time of nanocarriers and reduce their recognition and clearance by the immune system.
180
A. Tiwari et al.
6.4 Immunological Barriers toNanocarrier-Mediated
Drug Delivery
PEGylation is the procedure of adhering PEG chains to a nanocarriers’ surface, such as liposomes or nanoparticles. By inhibiting immune system detection and clearance, PEG chains can lengthen the duration that nanocarriers are in circulation in the bloodstream. Nanocarriers are foreign substances, and when they are intro­duced into the body, they can elicit an immune response. The immune system can recognize nanocarriers as foreign and try to eliminate them. This immune response can limit the effectiveness of nanocarriers as drug-delivery systems (Zolnik etal.
2010). By disguising the surface of the nanocarriers and preventing the immune
system from recognizing them, adding PEG chains to nanocarriers can aid in lower­ing the immunological response. The “stealth effect” is the name given to this phe­nomenon. The stealth effect can prolong the circulatory circulation duration of nanocarriers, allowing for their accumulation in the target tissue or organ (Zalba etal. 2022). However, prolonged circulation of PEGylated nanocarriers can also lead to the formation of anti-PEG antibodies in some patients. These antibodies can recognize and eliminate PEGylated nanocarriers, limiting their effectiveness as drug delivery systems. The formation of anti-PEG antibodies may also lead to hypersensitivity reactions in some patients (Zhang etal. 2016a).
Nanocarrier-mediated drug delivery has shown great potential for the treatment of various diseases. However, there are several immunological barriers that can limit their efcacy and safety. The immune system can recognize nanocarriers as foreign invaders, which can trigger an immune response. This can lead to the activa­tion of immune cells, such as macrophages and dendritic cells, and the production of inammatory cytokines (Liu etal. 2017). When nanocarriers are recognized by the immune system, they can be coated with opsonins, such as antibodies and com­plement proteins. This opsonization can promote their uptake by phagocytic cells, such as macrophages, which can limit their circulation time and therapeutic efcacy (Gamucci etal. 2014).
Furthermore, nanocarriers can be cleared from the body by the reticuloendothe­lial system (RES), which includes the liver and spleen. The rate of clearance can depend on the size, shape, surface charge, and surface chemistry of the nanocarrier (Duan and Li 2013). Some nanocarriers can be immunogenic, meaning they can stimulate an immune response even without an antigen. This can be due to adju­vants, contaminants, or impurities in the nanocarrier (Zarreen Simnani etal. 2023).
Although the nanocarriers offer a variety of advantages for drug delivery pur­poses, their utility is often limited by the immunological responses that are elicited upon their administration. Some strategies, such as surface modication and PEGylation, can be undertaken to overcome the immunological barriers associated with nanocarriers.
6 PEGylation asaTool toAlter Immunological Properties ofNanocarriers
181
6.4.1 Strategies toOvercome Immunological Barriers
There are several strategies that can be employed to overcome immunological bar­riers in nanocarrier-mediated drug delivery, including the use of biocompatible materials and surface modications. Nanocarrier surface modications possess a distinct advantage as they allow non-biocompatible materials to be delivered with­out eliciting an immune response. Surface modications include using macromol­ecules, membranes from endogenous cells, receptors, and steric polymers. The aim of utilizing the surface modication strategies is to synthesize the stealth nanocarri­ers, which are undetectable to the immune system, allowing them to reach the target site and exert their desired therapeutic response. The commonly utilized surface modication strategies are summarized in Table6.1.
6.4.1.1 PEGylation
PEGylation, as described earlier, refers to the method of coating the surface of nanocarriers with PEG.Various proteins, such as complement proteins, plasma pro­teins, and antibodies, are known to aggregate on the surface of foreign bodies and lead to protein corona formation, which marks the initial step in the process of immune recognition. PEG has shown a potential to hinder the formation of protein corona on the surface of nanocarriers by forming a steric barrier (Schöttler etal.
2016). Additionally, PEG-coated nanocarriers can be designed to smartly shed the
PEG coating in response to a stimulus upon reaching the target site. Qiao etal. suc­cessfully developed a nanosystem by combining matrix metalloprotease-2 sensitive peptides with HLAH, a pH-sensitive peptide, and PEG (Qiao etal. 2017). The PEG ensured the enhanced circulation time for the compound, whereas, upon reaching the acidic tumor microenvironment, the PEG coating was released, leading to the delivery of the cytotoxic compound to the target site.
Although PEGylation possesses various merits over non-PEGylated systems, it still presents certain limitations. PEG is susceptible to oxidative degradation, which

Table 6.1 Strategies to overcome immunological barriers

Surface modication strategy
PEGylation PEG Form steric barrier and
Coating with cell membranes
Coating with carbohydrates
Coating with proteins
Coating material
Cell membranes derived from RBCs, leukocytes
Heparin, hyaluronic acid, polysialic acid, glucosamine, and dextran
Albumin, CD47 ligand, zwitterion of lysine, and glutamic acid
Mechanism of immune evasion
prevent protein corona formation
Mimic circulatory cells and increases circulation time
Mimic cell surface and prevent protein corona formation
Form steric barrier and prevent protein corona formation
References Schöttler etal.
(2016)
Parodi etal. (2013)
Bellido etal. (2015)
Nowinski etal. (2014)
182
A. Tiwari et al.
will lead to the formation of reactive oxygen species, and repeated administration of the PEGylated system might also lead to the formation of anti-PEG antibodies (Sung et al. 2010; Verhoef et al. 2014). However, compared to other polymers potentially used to meet the same purpose, PEG is preferred choice.
6.4.1.2 Cell Membranes
Using cell membranes as a coating material for the nanocarriers is another area of research that primarily focuses on creating biomimetic systems to evade the immune response. The initial investigations in this area involved the development of nano­carriers coated with the membrane of red blood cells. This method exhibited prom­ising applications as the nanocarriers prepared by membrane coating retained their original structure with enhanced circulation time and reduced clearance (Hu etal.
2011). The coating with cell membranes allows multiple administrations of the
developed formulation without developing a signicant immune response (Hu etal.
2011; Piao etal. 2014).
Apart from RBCs, the membranes of various leukocytes have been utilized to demonstrate immune evasion by the nanocarriers. Leukocyte-derived membranes showed immune evasion of the nanocarriers and provided unique functions to the nanocarriers, such as receptor-ligand afnity and diapedesis (Parodi etal. 2013). The nanocarriers coated with platelet membranes showed stealth properties and the ability to adhere to the damaged blood vessels (Hu etal. 2015). Using cell mem­branes to coat the nanocarriers’ surface opened new avenues of opportunities in engineered biomimetic nanosystems. Future investigations in this domain are expected to develop synthetic biomimetic membranes with specic properties and targeting abilities.
6.4.1.3 Carbohydrates
Macromolecules have been thoroughly investigated to develop coated nanocarriers that can remain signicantly undetectable by the immune system. Heparin and hyal­uronic acid are the natural glycosaminoglycan polysaccharides found on the surface of various cells. This imparts the ability to trick the immune system and prevents the development of an immunogenic response against the coated nanocarriers (Bellido etal. 2015; Peer etal. 2003; Toole 2004). Monosaccharides such as polysialic acid have demonstrated similar functions by shielding the nanocarriers and allowing tar­geted delivery of nanocarriers (Wilson et al. 2014; Fernandes and Gregoriadis
2001). A precursor to glycosaminoglycans, glucosamine, is another carbohydrate
that reduces complement activation and thereby minimizes immunogenic response to the coated nanocarriers (Thasneem etal. 2013). Besides the above-mentioned polysaccharides and monosaccharides, dextran has also demonstrated the ability to evade complement activation (Thomas etal. 2011).
6.4.1.4 Proteins
Like carbohydrates, the presence of various proteins, as an integral part of anatomi­cal and physiological aspects of human beings, makes them a suitable choice for coating nanocarriers. Albumin, an abundantly present plasma protein, has been
6 PEGylation asaTool toAlter Immunological Properties ofNanocarriers
widely utilized as a coating material owing to its ability to shield the nanocarriers and form a steric barrier, which prevents the plasma proteins from forming a protein corona around the nanocarriers (Gulati etal. 2017, 2018). CD47 ligand is another commonly used coating material found on the surface of RBCs and is known to induce M1 phagocytic activity (Rodriguez etal. 2013). Zwitterions can also be uti­lized to coat the surface of nanocarriers effectively. Zwitterionic coating consisting of lysine and glutamic acid repeated chains has demonstrated signicant promise as a coating material by preventing protein corona formation on the surface of nano­carriers (Nowinski etal. 2014).
183
6.5 Effects ofPEGylation onInVivo Behavior
ofNanocarriers
PEGylation plays a crucial role in tailoring the invivo behavior of nanocarriers, profoundly impacting their efcacy as drug delivery systems. PEGylation imparts stealth properties to the nanocarriers, thereby preventing their immune recognition and enabling them to remain in systemic circulation for longer. Various effects of PEGylation on the invivo behavior of nanocarriers are discussed below.
6.5.1 Pharmacokinetics andBiodistribution ofNanocarriers
PEGylation can signicantly affect the pharmacokinetics (PK) and biodistribution of nanocarriers. By attaching PEG chains to the surface of nanocarriers, the physi­cochemical properties of the nanocarriers can be altered, leading to changes in their PK and biodistribution. One of the main effects of PEGylation is the extension of the circulation time of nanocarriers in the bloodstream. PEG chains on the surface of nanocarriers can create a steric barrier that reduces their recognition and uptake by the reticuloendothelial system (RES), resulting in increased systemic circulation time. The longer circulation time can allow nanocarriers to accumulate in the target tissue or organ and improve their therapeutic efcacy (Suk etal. 2016).
Another effect of PEGylation is the reduction of non-specic interactions between nanocarriers and biological components, such as serum proteins, cell mem­branes, and extracellular matrix components. This can decrease the rate of clearance and uptake by the RES, which can lead to improved biodistribution and reduced accumulation in non-target organs (Donahue etal. 2019). The size of PEG chains and their density on the surface of nanocarriers can also impact PK and biodistribu­tion. Higher PEG density on the surface of nanocarriers can lead to a more signi­cant reduction of RES uptake, but it may also lead to faster kidney clearance. Conversely, lower PEG density may increase non-specic interactions, leading to rapid clearance by the RES (Perry etal. 2012).
184
A. Tiwari et al.
6.5.2 Modulation oftheImmune Response
PEGylation can also modulate the immune response by reducing the recognition of nanocarriers by the immune system and altering the interaction between nanocarri­ers and immune cells. As mentioned earlier, nanocarriers can elicit an immune response, which can reduce their efcacy as drug delivery systems. By adding PEG chains to the surface of nanocarriers, the immune response can be reduced due to the “stealth effect.” The PEG chains can create a hydrophilic layer on the surface of nanocarriers, which can reduce their recognition and uptake by immune cells, such as macrophages and dendritic cells (Liu etal. 2017).
Moreover, PEGylation can also affect the cytokine prole of the immune response. Some studies have shown that PEGylation can lead to a shift toward an anti-inammatory cytokine prole, such as interleukin 10 (IL-10) and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), which can reduce inammation and promote tissue repair. This shift in cytokine prole can be benecial for treating inammatory dis­eases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (Naing etal. 2016). However, prolonged circula­tion of PEGylated nanocarriers can also lead to the formation of anti-PEG antibodies, which can elicit an immune response and limit the effectiveness of PEGylated nano­carriers. In some cases, these anti-PEG antibodies can also lead to hypersensitivity reactions.
Therefore, the immunomodulatory effects of PEGylation need to be carefully considered in developing nanomedicines. The PEGylation strategy needs to be opti­mized to achieve the desired immune response while minimizing the risk of adverse effects, such as forming anti-PEG antibodies (Xia etal. 2021).
6.5.3 Immunogenicity ofPEGylated Nanocarriers
Although PEGylation can reduce the immunogenicity of nanocarriers, it can also lead to the formation of anti-PEG antibodies, which can affect the safety and ef­cacy of PEGylated nanocarriers. The formation of anti-PEG antibodies is a concern because it can lead to accelerated clearance of PEGylated nanocarriers from the bloodstream and reduce their circulation time. This can decrease the therapeutic efcacy of PEGylated nanocarriers (Li etal. 2018). Several factors, including the size and shape of PEG chains, the density of PEG chains on the surface of nanocar­riers, the route of administration, the frequency of administration, and the immune status of the patient, may inuence the formation of anti-PEG antibodies. For exam­ple, smaller PEG chains may be more immunogenic than larger ones, and higher densities of PEG chains on the surface of nanocarriers may increase the likelihood of antibody formation (Kozma et al. 2020). Furthermore, it has been reported that some patients with pre-existing PEG-specic antibodies may be at an increased risk of developing hypersensitivity reactions to PEGylated nanocarriers. Hypersensitivity reactions can range from mild to severe, including anaphylaxis, and can limit the clinical application of PEGylated nanocarriers (Sellaturay et al. 2021).
6 PEGylation asaTool toAlter Immunological Properties ofNanocarriers
Fig. 6.2 Applications of PEGylated nanocarriers
185
While PEGylation can reduce the immunogenicity of nanocarriers, it can also lead to the formation of anti-PEG antibodies, which can impact the safety and ef­cacy of PEGylated nanocarriers. Careful consideration of the immunogenicity of PEGylated nanocarriers and optimization of the PEGylation strategy is necessary to minimize the risk of adverse immune responses.
6.6 Applications ofPEGylated Nanocarriers
inDrug Delivery
Considering the advantages PEGylation offers, the PEGylated moieties are expected to possess a diverse spectrum of applications in drug delivery. PEGylated nanocar­riers have been widely investigated as drug delivery systems for various therapeutic applications. The applications of PEGylated nanocarriers are elaborated in Fig.6.2.

6.6.1 Cancer Therapy

PEGylated liposomes have been approved for treating various cancers, including ovarian and multiple myeloma. PEGylation can increase the circulation time of liposomes and enhance their accumulation in tumors through the enhanced perme­ability and retention (EPR) effect. Furthermore, PEGylation can reduce the toxicity and immunogenicity of liposomes (Fulton and Najahi-Missaoui 2023).
186
A. Tiwari et al.

6.6.2 Gene Therapy

PEGylated nanoparticles have been used for gene therapy to deliver nucleic acids, such as DNA and RNA.PEGylation can protect the nucleic acids from degradation and increase their stability in circulation. Moreover, PEGylation can enhance the cellular uptake of nanoparticles and reduce their interaction with serum proteins and immune cells (Hatakeyama etal. 2011).

6.6.3 Immunotherapy

PEGylated nanoparticles have been used for immunotherapy to deliver immuno­modulatory agents, such as cytokines and Toll-like receptor agonists. PEGylation can increase the half-life of nanoparticles and improve their bioavailability. Moreover, PEGylation can reduce the toxicity and immunogenicity of immuno­modulatory agents (Debele etal. 2020).

6.6.4 Central Nervous System (CNS) Drug Delivery

PEGylated nanoparticles have been investigated for the delivery of drugs to the CNS, which is challenging due to the blood-brain barrier (BBB). PEGylation can enhance the penetration of nanoparticles through the BBB and improve the distribu­tion of drugs in the brain. Furthermore, PEGylation can reduce the clearance of nanoparticles by the RES in the liver and spleen (Crawford etal. 2016).

6.6.5 Pulmonary Drug Delivery

PEGylated nanoparticles have been investigated for pulmonary drug delivery, a non-invasive route of administration for treating respiratory diseases. PEGylation can increase the retention time of nanoparticles in the lungs and enhance their pen­etration through the mucus layer. Moreover, PEGylation can reduce the clearance of nanoparticles by the immune system in the lungs (Almeida and Souto 2007).

6.6.6 Ocular Drug Delivery

PEGylated nanocarriers have shown potential in ocular drug delivery, allowing for sustained release of drugs to the eye. These nanocarriers can improve the bioavail­ability of drugs, prolong therapeutic effects, and enhance patient compliance in treating ocular diseases (Tsai etal. 2018).