Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5537_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
22 Мб
Скачать
should be doubled until a diuresis occurs. Addition of a thiazide diuretic can be an effective way to block sodium reabsorption at other sites of the nephron. Delivering loop diuretics as a continuous intravenous infusion avoids rebound tubular sodium reabsorption and produces a steady diure­sis. On occasion, it may be necessary to measure cardiac filling pressures and resting hemodynamics in those instances where doubt exists as to a patient’s true volume status and cardiac output. Addition of a vasodilator or inotrope may be indicated in cases of a reduced cardiac output to increase both renal perfusion and GFR.
An alternative way to reduce congestion is to mechanically remove fluid. Ultrafiltration uses a pressure gradient across a semipermeable membrane to remove fluid. The composition of this fluid contains more sodium than that produced by loop diuretics. Although clinical experience with this device is limited, in one study ultrafiltrated patients spent fewer days in hospital and required repeat heart failure hospitalizations less often than patients receiving loop diuretics.
13
Current barriers to wide­spread use of ultrafiltration include its more invasive nature, need for vas­cular access, telemetry or intensive care unit monitoring and cost.
Vasodilators
Vasodilators are effective drugs for treating acute decompensated heart failure, because they quickly improve the loading conditions on the heart. They act by relaxing vascular smooth muscle cells and in so doing reduce systemic vascular resistance and increase venous capacitance. By lower­ing both afterload and preload, vasodilators reduce ventricular volumes, myocardial wall stress and oxygen demand. The efficiency of cardiac con­traction improves and cardiac output increases. Vasodilators also decrease the severity of mitral regurgitation, when present, and further lower pul­monary capillary pressure. Unlike diuretics, vasodilators may decrease neurohormonal stimulation. They are usually reserved for patients who have more pronounced symptoms upon presentation or persistent symp­toms in spite of treatment with intravenous diuretics. Vasodilators work
214
G. Sayer and S. Pinney
particularly well in patients with significant hypertension. They should be used cautiously in patients with a reduced blood pressure and are con­traindicated in cardiogenic shock.
Currently, three vasodilators are used for the treatment of acute heart failure: nitroglycerin, sodium nitroprusside and nesiritide. Nitroglycerin produces vascular relaxation by first being converted to nitric oxide, which in turn signals cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) produc­tion. It is primarily a venodilator, but is often used in patients with acute coronary syndromes because of its ability to dilate coronary arteries. Its use may be limited by headache, hypotension and tachyphylaxis. When it is employed to treat heart failure, much higher doses than those used in treating myocardial ischemia are required. Sodium nitroprusside works through a similar mechanism as nitroglycerin, but is a more potent arterial dilator. As a result, it is more likely to produce hypotension and it should be administered only in an intensive care unit with continuous arterial blood pressure monitoring. Nitroprusside may worsen myocardial ischemia by producing coronary steal and reflex tachycardia. Prolonged infusion may result in thiocyanate toxicity, particularly in patients with impaired renal function. Nesiritide is a recombinant form of B-type natriuretic peptide which lowers pulmonary capillary wedge pressure more quickly than nitroglycerin while alleviating dyspnea to a similar degree.
14
It has a longer half-life than nitroglycerin or nitroprusside and requires minimal, if any, dose titration. Its primary side effect is hypotension, which can be mitigated by omitting an initial bolus.
Inotropes
Inotropes enhance cardiac contractility by promoting actin–myosin bridg­ing in myocardial cells. Dobutamine and dopamine work through beta-1 receptors, stimulating the production of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and increasing intracellular calcium. Milrinone is a phosphodi­esterase-3 inhibitor that prevents breakdown of cAMP. In addition to its myocardial effects, milrinone produces vascular smooth muscle cell
215
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
relaxation and vasodilation. As opposed to the catecholamines, milrinone leaves the beta-receptor unoccupied and allows for concomitant therapy with a beta-blocker. This approach may be particularly useful when tran­sitioning hospitalized patients off inotropes to chronic medical therapy. Inotropes should be reserved for patients with poor peripheral perfusion where augmenting cardiac output is required to restore an adequate circu­lation and relieve symptoms.
All inotropes possess significant side effects. They elevate the heart rate, promote tachyarrhythmias and, in the case of milrinone, produce hypotension. Increases in the heart rate and contractility increase myocardial oxygen demand and may worsen ischemia. As in chronic heart failure, routine inotrope use increases mortality and is strongly discouraged.
15

Transition Home

Hospitalization for acute heart failure offers a “teachable moment” for cli­nicians to instruct patients about living with heart failure. Spending ade­quate time teaching patients and their families about triggers of heart failure, prognosis, importance of compliance, and identifying signs and symptoms of clinical worsening can often reduce the need for subsequent hospitalization. Prior to going home, all patients should receive written discharge instructions that address:
Dietary restrictions;
Activity level;
Discharge medications;
Followup appointments;
Daily weight monitoring;
What to do if symptoms worsen.
Clinicians should ensure that patients have achieved euvolemia and are receiving optimal doses of ACE/ARB and beta-blockers. The
216
G. Sayer and S. Pinney
ventricular rate of atrial fibrillation should be controlled. Whenever possible, hospitalized heart failure patients should be referred to an outpatient disease management team. Taking the time to complete these steps in accordance with clinical practice guidelines will ensure a safe, high-quality discharge.

Conclusion

Treating acute heart failure patients remains a clinical challenge. Current therapies effectively improve symptoms, but have uncertain effects on mortality. Applying the evidence-based approaches outlined above and summarized in Fig. 2 should help improve outcomes for these complex patients.
217
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
failure. D = diuretic therapy or mechanical volume removel; V = vasodilator therapy; I = inotropic therapy (Reprinted, with permission, from Ref. 17.)

References

1. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, et al. (2009) Heart disease and stroke statistics — 2009 update: A report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 119: 480–486.
2. Krumholz HM, Parent EM, Tu N, et al. (1997) Readmission after hospitalization for congestive heart failure among Medicare benefici­aries. Arch Intern Med 157: 99–104.
3. Goldberg RJ, Ciampa J, Lessard D, et al. (2007) Long-term survival after heart failure: A contemporary population-based perspective. Arch Intern Med 167: 490–496.
4. Stevenson LW. (1999) Tailored therapy to hemodynamic goals for advanced heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 1: 251–257.
5. Gheorghiade M, Zannad F, Sopko G, et al. (2005) Acute heart failure syndromes: Current state and framework for future research. Circulation 112: 3958–3968.
6. Peacock WFt, De Marco T, Fonarow GC, et al. (2008) Cardiac troponin and outcome in acute heart failure. N Engl J Med 358: 2117–2126.
7. Fonarow GC, Abraham WT, Albert NM, et al. (2008) Factors identi­fied as precipitating hospital admissions for heart failure and clinical outcomes: Findings from OPTIMIZE-HF. Arch Intern Med 168: 847–854.
8. Maisel AS, Krishnaswamy P, Nowak RM, et al. (2002) Rapid meas­urement of B-type natriuretic peptide in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure. N Engl J Med 347: 161–167.
9. Fonarow GC, Abraham WT, Albert NM, et al. (2007) Influence of a performance-improvement initiative on quality of care for patients hospitalized with heart failure: Results of the Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure (OPTIMIZE-HF). Arch Intern Med 167: 1493–1502.
10. Gheorghiade M, Pang PS. (2009) Acute heart failure syndromes. J Am
Coll Cardiol 53: 557–573.
218
G. Sayer and S. Pinney
11. Fonarow GC, Adams KF, Jr., Abraham WT, et al. (2005) Risk strati­fication for in-hospital mortality in acutely decompensated heart fail­ure: Classification and regression tree analysis. JAMA 293: 572–580.
12. Levy WC, Mozaffarian D, Linker DT, et al. (2006) The Seattle Heart Failure Model: Prediction of survival in heart failure. Circulation 113: 1424–1433.
13. Costanzo MR, Guglin ME, Saltzberg MT, et al. (2007) Ultrafiltration versus intravenous diuretics for patients hospitalized for acute decom­pensated heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 49: 675–683.
14. Publication Committee for the VMAC Investigators (Vasodilatation in the Management of Acute CHF). (2002) Intravenous nesiritide vs nitroglycerin for treatment of decompensated congestive heart failure: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 287: 1531–1540.
15. Cuffe MS, Califf RM, Adams KF, Jr., et al. (2002) Short-term intra­venous milrinone for acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 287: 1541–1547.
16. Konstam MA, Gheorghiade M, Burnett JC, Jr., et al. (2007) Effects of oral tolvaptan in patients hospitalized for worsening heart failure: The EVEREST Outcome Trial. JAMA 297: 1319–1331.
17. Yancy CW. (2008) Vasodilator therapy for decompensated heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 52: 208–210.
219
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
This page intentionally left blankThis page intentionally left blank
Valvular Heart Disease
Mark Harrison†and Lane Duvall *

Key Pearls

With the aging of the US population, the four major types of
valvular heart disease (aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, mitral stenosis and mitral regurgitation) will continue to increase in preva­lence. Transthoracic echocardiography plays a key role in making the diagnosis.
In patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, (as manifested by
syncope, shortness of breath, or angina), surgical valve replacement is the best current treatment option.
Mitral stenosis is usually caused by rheumatic heart disease and ther-
apy is targeted towards reducing CHF symptoms and decreasing the risk of thromboembolism.
Aortic regurgitation presents variably, depending on the underlying
etiology and natural history.
Mitral regurgitation is caused by a wide number of entities. Medical
therapy is centered around relieving pulmonary congestion, but when patients become symptomatic, they may benefit from surgical repair or replacement of the valve.
221
*Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
The Hudson Valley Heart Center, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA.
21
Chapter

Introduction

Valvular heart disease includes a group of congenital or acquired conditions characterized by abnormal valvular function (stenosis, regurgitation, or both) which can cause significant morbidity and mortality.
1–2
While the exact prevalence is unknown, estimates have identified up to 5 million Americans affected, with the number expected to increase as the population ages.
3–4
Transthoracic echocardiography plays a key role in making the diagnosis.
5–6

Aortic Stenosis (AS)

A normal trileaflet aortic valve allows for unobstructed flow between the left ventricle and the aorta. Under certain pathologic circumstances, aor­tic stenosis develops, in which the valve can narrow and prevent complete opening, impeding normal blood flow.
Etiology
In the United States, the most common cause of AS is progressive calcifi­cation and degeneration of the valve occurring with age. “Senile” AS usu­ally presents in the seventh through ninth decade of life. Worldwide, rheumatic fever can be a cause of AS, presenting in the third through fifth decade of life, and usually accompanied by mitral valve disease. Due to recurrent inflammation, the valve progressively narrows through fibrous contracture and fusion of adjacent cusps. Finally, a congenital cause of AS occurs in patients with a bicuspid aortic valve, consisting of two cusps instead of three. Occurring in 1–2% of people, bicuspid aortic valves are especially prone to the formation of calcium deposits and bicuspid AS usually presents in the 40s and 50s.
History and Physical
Symptoms of aortic stenosis tend to develop gradually. Ultimately, patients with progressive disease experience the classic triad of chest pain, syncope, and congestive heart failure (CHF).
222
M. Harrison and L. Duvall
In patients with angina, the five-year mortality rate is 50%. Syncope can be attributed to poor cardiac output, decreased cerebral blood flow, or cardiac arrhythmias. After a syncopal event, the median survival is three years. Finally, for individuals with symptoms of CHF, the prognosis is extremely poor, with a two-year mortality of 50% if the valve is not replaced. Symptoms of heart failure may occur from a combination of systolic dysfunction, diastolic dysfunction, or both.
On examination, patients with aortic stenosis typically have a harsh systolic crescendo-decrescendo murmur heard at the right upper sternal border which radiates to both carotids. Advanced disease is suggested by a diminished S2, late peaking murmur, and weak and delayed carotid pulses.
Diagnosis and Testing
The standard evaluation for patients with suspected AS includes an ECG, chest X-ray (CXR) and an echocardiogram. In advanced aortic stenosis, the 12-lead ECG will often reveal left ventricular hypertrophy; however, it is not present in all patients. On CXR, cardiomegaly and calcification of the aorta and aortic valve support the diagnosis of AS.
Ultimately, echocardiography can confirm the clinical diagnosis of aortic stenosis. Beyond assessing the degree and severity of valve nar­rowing, echo provides additional information on ventricular size, systolic and diastolic function, valve leaflet number, valve morphology, and the degree of calcification. Cardiac catheterization can be used for hemody­namic confirmation of severity if needed.
Treatment
The initial management of patients with significant AS presenting with congestive heart failure includes monitoring, supportive oxygen, intra­venous access, and diuretics. For patients with angina, measures should be taken to relieve the chest discomfort, which may include administration of oxygen, nitrates, and beta blockers. Importantly, blood pressure lowering
223
Valvular Heart Disease