Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5537_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Contents
- •List of Contributors
- •Hospitalists as Leaders
- •Key Pearls
- •Challenges
- •The Future
- •References
- •Key Clinical Pearls
- •Introduction
- •The Path to Leadership
- •Leading in Care Delivery
- •Leading in Hospital Quality and Patient Safety
- •Leading in Education
- •Introduction
- •Diagnosis
- •Clinical Scenario
- •Diagnosis Study
- •Discussion
- •Prognosis
- •Clinical Scenario
- •Prognosis Study
- •Discussion
- •Therapy
- •Clinical Scenario
- •Therapy Trial
- •Discussion
- •Economics
- •Clinical Scenario
- •Economics Study
- •Economics Criteria
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Introduction
- •A New Paradigm: The Evidence Hierarchy
- •Becoming an Evidence-based Practitioner
- •Answering Questions
- •Resources to Answer Background Questions
- •Resources to Answer Foreground Questions
- •Summary
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Introduction
- •The Clinical Exam as Diagnostic Test
- •Assessing Volume Status
- •Acute Blood Loss
- •Non-Blood Loss Causes of Hypovolemia
- •How to Perform Postural Vital Signs
- •Cardiac Murmurs
- •Systolic Murmurs
- •Aortic Stenosis
- •How to Perform the Useful Physical Exam for Aortic Stenosis
- •Mitral Regurgitation
- •How to Examine the Useful Physical Exam for Mitral Regurgitation
- •Diastolic Murmurs
- •Aortic Insufficiency
- •How to Perform the Useful Physical Exam for Aortic Insufficiency
- •Hepatomegaly
- •How to Perform the Useful Physical Exam to Assess Hepatomegaly
- •Ascites
- •How to Perform the Useful Physical Exam to Assess for Ascites
- •Central Venous Pressure
- •Evaluation of JVP
- •Abdominojugular Reflux Test
- •Kussmaul Sign
- •Pleural Effusion
- •How to Perform the Useful Physical Exam
- •Conventional Percussion
- •Chest Expansion
- •Tactile Fremitus
- •References
- •Patient Safety and Hospital Quality
- •Key Pearls
- •Background
- •Communication Standards
- •Systematic Approaches
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Accountability
- •Causal Factors of Error (Swiss cheese model)
- •Reporting
- •Root Cause Analysis
- •Disclosure
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Introduction
- •Key Pearls
- •Background and Essential Elements of Teamwork
- •Quality
- •Choosing Performance Improvement Targets
- •Do Your Homework — Gather Baseline Data
- •Form the Right Team
- •Define Goals
- •Break Down the Problem — Process Maps
- •Collect Data
- •Analyze the Findings
- •Implement Change
- •Measure, Track and Repeat
- •Summary
- •References
- •Challenges to Improving Teamwork
- •Assessment of Teamwork
- •Examples of Successful Interventions
- •Team Training
- •Daily Goals of Care
- •Interdisciplinary Rounds
- •Nurse-Physician Unit Co-Leadership
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Background
- •Barriers
- •Successful Strategies
- •Remaining Challenges
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Required Components of the Discharge Process
- •Optional Components of the Discharge Process
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Introduction
- •Drivers for Health Information Technology
- •The Electronic Health Record
- •Clinical Decision Support (CDS)
- •The Risks and Benefits of HIT
- •Roles for Hospitalists in Health Informatics
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Business of Hospital Medicine
- •Key Pearls
- •Introduction
- •Hospitalist Movement a Way Out to Provide Cost Effective Treatment
- •Business Plan for a Hospitalist Program
- •Staffing Structure of the Program
- •Cost Projection
- •Revenue Generation
- •Business Plan Outline and Factors
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Metrics
- •Volume
- •Length of Stay
- •Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA)
- •Avoidable re-admissions
- •Hospital-acquired conditions
- •Clinical Documentation
- •MS-DRG
- •APR-DRG
- •Satisfaction Surveys
- •Medical Necessity
- •Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC)
- •Concurrent Review
- •Retrospective Denial
- •Dashboards
- •Aligning Interests
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Introduction
- •Hospitalist Coding
- •Documenting E&M Codes for Initial and Subsequent Visits
- •Chief Complaint
- •History
- •Physical Exam
- •Medical Decision Making
- •Determining Which Code to Use
- •Documenting E&M Codes for Discharge Day Visits
- •Documenting E&M Codes for Consultation Visits
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Definition of Non-Physician Practitioners (NPPs)
- •Quality and Cost-Effectiveness of NPs and PAs Care
- •NPPs Roles and Responsibilities
- •Autonomy and Scope of Practice
- •NPPs in Academic Centers
- •NPPs in Small Community Hospital
- •NPPs in Private Physician Hospitalist Service
- •Potential Pitfalls of Collaboration
- •Reimbursement and Billing
- •References
- •Hospitalist as Educator
- •Key Pearls
- •Tips for Teaching that Won’t Slow you Down (Too Much)
- •Teaching Different Levels of Learners
- •The Microskills of Clinical Teaching
- •Example of the Microskills in Action
- •Pearls for Giving Meaningful Feedback with Less Stress
- •Making Time for Teaching
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Introduction
- •Framework
- •Set the Stage with Learners — What to Do Before Entering the Room
- •1. Establish your goals ahead of time
- •2. State your established goals clearly to the group
- •3. Define roles and responsibilities
- •4. Establish that there will be debriefing and feedback after the encounter
- •Orient the Patient — What to Do When you Enter the Room
- •1. Introductions
- •2. Explain the goals and structure of the encounter to the patient
- •3. Elicit any additional goals from the patient
- •Key Principles to Follow at the Bedside
- •1. Follow your pre-arranged structure
- •2. Maintain patient respect
- •3. Maintain learner respect
- •Debrief — Outside the Room
- •1. Provide learner-specific feedback
- •2. Elicit feedback about the session
- •Summary
- •References
- •Cardiology
- •Key Pearls
- •Key History Elements and Physical Exam Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Cardiac Testing
- •Chest Pain Units
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Definitition and Pathophysiology
- •Diagnosis
- •ECG Evaluation
- •History
- •Physical Exam
- •Cardiac Biomarkers
- •Initial Treatment and Stabilization
- •UA/NSTEMI
- •STEMI
- •Transition to Maintenance Therapy
- •Quality Measures in Acute Coronary Syndromes
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Profiles
- •Diagnostic Strategies
- •Outcomes of Acute Heart Failure
- •Management of Acute Heart Failure
- •Diuretics
- •Vasodilators
- •Inotropes
- •Transition Home
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Introduction
- •Aortic Stenosis (AS)
- •Etiology
- •History and Physical
- •Diagnosis and Testing
- •Treatment
- •Mitral Stenosis (MS)
- •Etiology
- •History and Physical
- •Diagnosis and Testing
- •Treatment
- •Aortic Regurgitation (AR)
- •Etiology
- •History and Physical
- •Diagnosis and Testing
- •Treatment
- •Mitral Regurgitation (MR)
- •Etiology
- •History and Physical
- •Diagnosis and Testing
- •Treatment
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Introduction
- •Epidemiology
- •Etiologies and Associated Conditions
- •Clinical Findings
- •History and Physical Examination
- •Electrocardiogram
- •Echocardiography
- •Additional Laboratory Evaluation
- •Management
- •Rate Control
- •Stroke Risk Assessment
- •Antithrombotic Therapy
- •Rhythm Control
- •Cardioversion
- •Maintenance of sinus rhythm
- •Future Trends
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Introduction
- •Role of the Electrophysiology Study
- •Bradyarrhythmias
- •Tachyarrhythmias
- •Supraventricular Arrhythmias
- •Regular Narrow Complex Tachycardia with a Short RP Interval
- •AV-nodal re-entrant tachycardia
- •AV re-entrant tachycardia
- •Atrial tachycardia
- •Ventricular Arrhythmias
- •Ventricular Tachycardia in the Absence of Structural Heart Disease (Idiopathic VT)
- •Left bundle branch block VT
- •Right bundle branch block VT
- •Ventricular Tachycardia in the Presence of Structural Heart Disease
- •Ischemic cardiomyopathy
- •Nonischemic cardiomyopathy
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Introduction
- •Incidence and Etiology
- •Pathophysiology
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Ophthalmic Manifestations
- •Neurological Changes (Hypertensive Encephalopathy)
- •Cardiovascular Complications
- •The Kidney
- •Hematological Changes
- •Clinical Evaluation (Table 2)
- •Treatment
- •Hypertensive Urgency (Table 3)
- •Hypertensive Emergency (Table 4)
- •Specific Situations (Table 5)
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Introduction
- •Patient History
- •Physical Examination
- •Cardiac Syncope: Arrhythmia and Structural Heart Disease
- •Select Options for Monitoring and Diagnostic Evaluation
- •References
- •Pulmonary
- •Key Pearls
- •Pathophysiology
- •Diagnosis
- •Clinical History
- •Physical Examination
- •General Appearance
- •Vital Signs
- •Chest
- •Cardiac Exam
- •Extremities
- •Neurologic
- •Basic Diagnostic Testing
- •Advanced Diagnostic Testing
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Early Management of the Acutely Dyspneic Patient
- •Key Management Strategies
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Introduction
- •Definition, Precipitating Factors and Mortality Risk
- •Evaluation of Patients Hospitalized with an Asthma Exacerbation
- •History
- •Physical Examination
- •Objective Testing
- •Management of Patients Hospitalized with an Asthma Exacerbation
- •Medications
- •Adjunct Therapy
- •Monitoring Parameters
- •Treatment of Comorbid Conditions
- •When to Consult a Specialist
- •Goals for Discharge
- •Summary
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Introduction
- •Acute Exacerbations
- •Treatment of Acute Exacerbations
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Evaluation
- •History
- •Clinical Exam
- •Radiologic Evaluation
- •Pulmonary Function Testing, Echocardiography, Laboratory Data and Ancillary Testing
- •Surgical Lung Biopsy
- •Management of DPLD
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Introduction
- •Definition
- •Classification
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Evaluation (see Fig. 1)
- •Medical Treatment
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Prognosis
- •References
- •Critical Care
- •Key Pearls
- •Introduction
- •Definitions, Pathophysiology, and Epidemiology
- •What Is SIRS/Sepsis/Severe Sepsis/ Sepsis with Shock
- •What Causes Sepsis
- •What Causes Shock in Sepsis
- •What Is the Cause of Microcirculatory Disturbance in Sepsis
- •Sepsis Recognition and Intervention: Principles and Action Plan
- •Key Recognition Principles and Guidelines
- •Key Intervention Principles
- •Role of Monitoring: What to Measure — When and How Reliable
- •Other Therapeutic Considerations/Controversies
- •Outcome Analysis and Prognosis
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Introduction
- •Initiation of Mechanical Ventilation
- •Modes and Settings
- •Monitoring and Supportive Care
- •Monitoring
- •Supportive Care
- •Disease-Specific Conditions and Ventilator Management
- •Obstructive Lung Disease
- •Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome/ Acute Lung Injury
- •Evaluation of Respiratory Distress in the Mechanically Ventilated Patient
- •Liberation from the Mechanical Ventilator
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Glucose Goals
- •Insulin IV Infusion
- •Glucose Monitoring
- •Calculation of SC Insulin Doses
- •References
- •Renal
- •Key Pearls
- •Introduction
- •Common Reasons for ESRD-related Hospitalization
- •Infections
- •Catheter-related Bacteremia
- •Catheter-associated Peritonitis
- •Volume Overload
- •Vascular Access Issues
- •Steal Syndrome
- •Aneurysms
- •Hyperkalemia
- •Tips for Managing Hospitalized ESRD Patients
- •Orders
- •Daily Weights
- •Renal Diet
- •Labs
- •Medications
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Opportunity for Renal Replacement Therapy Preparation and Re-Evaluation During Inpatient Hospitalization
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Introduction
- •Initial Workup of AKI
- •Categories of AKI
- •Prerenal AKI
- •Definition
- •Diagnosis
- •Treatment
- •Intrarenal (Intrinsic) AKI
- •Definition
- •Diagnosis
- •Treatment
- •Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy
- •Prognosis of CIN
- •Prevention of CIN
- •Postrenal AKI
- •Diagnosis
- •Treatment
- •Intravenous Fluids for Postobstructive Diuresis
- •Parameters to Monitor in Postobstructive Diuresis
- •Medications and Procedures in AKI
- •Renal Consult for AKI
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Initial Considerations
- •Metabolic Acidosis
- •Causes
- •Clinical Manifestations
- •Compensatory Mechanisms
- •Diagnosis
- •Treatment
- •Metabolic Alkalosis
- •Clinical Manifestations
- •Compensatory Mechanisms
- •Diagnosis
- •Treatment
- •Respiratory Acidosis
- •Clinical Manifestations
- •Compensatory Mechanisms
- •Diagnosis
- •Treatment
- •Respiratory Alkalosis
- •Clinical Manifestations
- •Compensatory Mechanisms
- •Diagnosis
- •Treatment
- •Mixed Acid-Base Disorders
- •Interpretation of Blood Gas Measurements
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •General Concepts
- •Hyponatremia
- •Workup
- •History
- •Physical exam
- •Labs
- •Treatment
- •Hypernatremia
- •Workup
- •History
- •Physical exam
- •Labs
- •Treatment
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Introduction
- •Hyperkalemia
- •Etiology
- •Clinical Manifestations
- •Signs and Symptoms
- •ECG Manifestations
- •Workup
- •Transtubular potassium concentration gradient
- •Plasma Aldosterone Concentration and Plasma Renin Activity
- •Treatment
- •Hypokalemia
- •Etiology
- •Clinical Manifestations
- •Signs and Symptoms
- •ECG Manifestations
- •Workup
- •Random Urine Potassium–Creatinine Ratio
- •24 hr Urinary Potassium Excretion
- •PAC, PRA and PAC/PRA Ratio
- •Treatment
- •References
- •Key Pearls
- •Appendicitis
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Management
- •Acute Cholecystitis
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Management
- •Diverticulitis
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Management
- •Bowel Ischemia
- •Acute Mesenteric Ischemia
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Management
- •Colonic Ischemia
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Management
- •Iatrogenic Abdominal Pain
- •Urological/Renal or Gynecological Causes of Abdominal Pain
- •General Concerns
- •Pain Management

This page intentionally left blankThis page intentionally left blank

Cardiology

This page intentionally left blankThis page intentionally left blank

187
Approach to Chest Pain
Kevin G. Dunsky*
Key Pearls
• Cardiovascular causes of chest pain include myocardial ischemia,
aortic dissection, myocarditis, pericarditis and coronary spasm.
• Myocardial perfusion imaging, which includes two common agents,
thallium-201 and technetium-99 sestamibi, increases the diagnostic
accuracy of stress testing.
• Stress echocardiography looks at stress-induced decreases in wall
motion which may indicate underlying coronary ischemia. These
results are similar to SPECT imaging.
6
• Perhaps the greatest utility of cardiac computed tomography is its
strong negative predictive value. Various studies have shown the
negative predictive value to be 96–100%.
• Although there is no evidence that chest pain units decrease adverse
outcomes, they may reduce length of stay and rate of hospital
admissions.
Chest pain remains a diagnostic challenge to the physician in both
the — inpatient and outpatient setting. It is a common complaint and
the ramifications for the patient can range from a minimal issue to a lifethreatening disorder.
18
Chapter
*Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Key History Elements and Physical Exam Findings
As is true in all of medicine, the history and physical examination are critical in making the proper diagnosis. The duration, location and quality of
the pain should always be determined. One should ask if the pain is related
to food and whether or not it occurs during coughing or deep inspiration.
It is important to know if anything exacerbates or relieves the pain.
Associated symptoms such as dyspnea, nausea, vomiting and radiating
pain should be included when talking to the patient.
Special attention to the physical exam needs to be performed. Just by
looking at the patient, one can assess for diaphoresis or cyanosis. Taking
blood pressures in both arms is important because this can provide clues
to the presence of an aortic dissection. Simple inspection of the chest wall
for lesions indicating the presence of herpes zoster is important. Crepitus
indicating the presence of subcutaneous air may be seen in the presence
of an esophageal rupture. Proper auscultation of the lungs can help diagnose congestive heart failure or the possible presence of a pneumothorax.
Friction rubs can help to diagnose pericarditis. The presence of an S3
can indicate the presence of congestive heart failure, whereas an S4 is
present in myocardial ischemia and at times in diastolic dysfunction.
Simple palpation of the abdomen can help identify potential problems
such as masses or organomegaly. Right upper quadrant tenderness may
increase the likelihood of cholecystitis.
Differential Diagnosis
Chest pain can be caused by a variety of disorders. Essentially, any input
through the thoracic autonomic ganglia can cause chest pain. Esophageal
rupture is a critical disorder and should be considered. Chest X-ray and
esophagography can often aid in confirming this diagnosis. Peptic ulcer disease and gastroesophageal reflux may also masquerade as chest pain.
Pancreatitis and biliary tract disease should also be considered. Pancreatitis
is often associated with an elevated amylase or lipase. Patients with biliary
disease often present with recurrent right upper quadrant pain or pain after
eating. It is quite uncommon that exertion would elicit any of these findings.
188
K.G. Dunsky

Pulmonary etiologies, including pleuritis and pneumonia, may also
present as chest pain. Pain during breathing or coughing may be seen in
pleuritis. Fevers and productive sputum are often seen in patients with
pneumonia. Life-threatening pulmonary disorders such as a pulmonary
embolism is always of great concern. Various diagnostic tools are available to diagnose pulmonary embolism. Clinical risk predictors include
signs and symptoms of deep venous thrombosis, tachycardia, immobilization for more than three days, hemoptysis, previous deep venous
thrombosis or pulmonary embolus, or surgery within four weeks.¹
Diagnostic tools include a V/Q scan or CT angiogram. A tension pneumothorax can also be a life-threatening disorder and this is often diagnosed clinically as well as on a routine chest X-ray.
Musculoskeletal disorders such as costochondritis and trauma can
cause chest pain and should be considered. Herpes zoster can clearly
cause chest pain and in fact the chest pain, may precede the vesicular rash
by several days.
Cardiovascular causes clearly need to be identified due to the possible fatal implications. Thus, myocardial ischemia and aortic dissection are
two findings that can clearly cause chest pain. Myocarditis and pericarditis should also be included in this list. Intermittent or constant chest pain
that is exacerbated by breathing is commonly described in patients with
pericarditis. It is often worse in the supine position and is relieved by the
patient leaning forward. A friction rub may be present on physical exam.
Myocardits is often associated with fever and a recent infection. Coronary
artery spasm may cause chest pain that may be indistinguishable from a
person experiencing an acute coronary syndrome.
Since heart disease is a leading cause of mortality, it is essential to
identify whether such a diagnosis can be confirmed. Identifying risk factors such as hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, tobacco use, diabetes
and an early family history of coronary artery disease should always be
carried out. A full physical, ECG and cardiac biomarkers such as troponins should be obtained. If the chest pain is not related to exertion whatsoever, it is less likely that the pain is due to an acute coronary syndrome.
It should be noted, however, that critical disease can be caused from silent
189
Approach to Chest Pain

ischemia, and the patient may not exhibit any of the usual signs or symptoms of chest pain.
Cardiac Testing
Stress testing is a significant tool in diagnosing heart disease. An exercise
stress test will attempt to reproduce the chest pain and assess for ECG
changes which may be indicative of coronary ischemia. The American
College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association performed a
meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of exercise stress testing involving 24,045 patients who underwent both coronary angiography and exercise stress testing. The results indicated a mean sensitivity of 68% and a
mean specificity of 77%. If patients with previous MI’s were excluded,
the mean sensitivity was 67% and the mean specificity was 72% of exercise stress testing for diagnosing coronary artery disease.²
Myocardial perfusion imaging, which includes two common agents,
thallium-201 and technetium-99 sestamibi, increases the diagnostic accuracy of stress testing. The ACC/AHA guidelines report that when both exercise and pharmacologic stress tests with SPECT imaging are compared with
angiography, the test is 87–89% sensitive and 73–75% specific for significant stenosis (>50%).³ Vanzetto performed a six year follow-up study which
showed that in patients with a normal thallium-201 perfusion study, the rate
of myocardial infarction or death was only 0.88%.
4
Iskander performed a
meta-analysis which showed that a normal technetium-99 sestamibi imaging result was associated with a 0.6% cardiac event rate per year.
5
Stress echocardiography looks at stress-induced decreases in wall
motion which may indicate underlying coronary ischemia. A study by
Fleischmann showed that stress echocardiography had a sensitivity of
85% and a specificity of 77% as compared with coronary angiography.
Although this test is operator dependent, these results are similar to
SPECT imaging.
6
Cardiac computed tomography can measure calcification in the walls
of the coronary arteries. The amount of calcium is expressed as an
Agatston score. If any calcification is present, the test is considered
190
K.G. Dunsky

positive. Calcium scores greater than 1000 are associated with increases
in morbidity and mortality. In fact, such a score indicates a patient having
a 20% chance of suffering a myocardial infarction or cardiac death within
a year. However, it should be noted that a high score does not necessarily
mean that there is an obstructive lesion. A positive scan indicates atherosclerosis, but that does not mean significant obstruction is present.
7
Perhaps the greatest utility of this test is its strong negative predictive
value. Anegative test has a 96–100% negative predictive value for obstructive lesions.
8
Thus, patients with a normal study are unlikely to have significant stenosis. This can be of great help to physicians evaluating chest
pain patients in acute settings.
Chest Pain Units
Patients often present to the Emergency Department with complaints of
chest pain. Chest pain units have been developed to help physicians choose
which patients would benefit from further testing and inpatient admission.
Protocols including a history and physical, observation period and serial
measurements of serum biomarkers are used to help improve risk stratifying this patient population. Although there is no evidence that chest pain
units decrease adverse outcomes, there are a number of trials which indicate
that they may reduce length of stay and rate of hospital admissions. As a
result, chest pain protocols for evaluating patients with suspected acute
coronary syndromes (ACS) and chest pain in the Emergency Department
received a Class I recommendation by the 2010 American Heart
Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency
Cardiovascular Care.
9
Conclusion
Chest pain is a common presentation that all physicians face. The differential diagnosis is wide and includes many different etiologies, including
pulmonary, gastrointestinal, infectious as well as cardiac. A careful history
and physical will help to narrow the diagnosis. Since cardiac disease is a
191
Approach to Chest Pain

leading cause of mortality, it is essential to make the proper diagnosis. The
various imaging tests described above will greatly help the physician to
make the proper diagnosis and as a result help to facilitate the proper care
of the patient.
References
1. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. (2000) Derivation of a sim-
ple clinical model to categorize patients’ probability of pulmonary
embolism: Increasing the model utility with the SimpliREDD-dimer.
Thromb Haemost 83: 418.
2. Gianrossi R, Detrano R, Mulvihill D, et al. Exercise-induced ST
depression in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. A meta-analysis.
Circulation 80: 87–98.
3. Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Beasley JW, et al. (1997) ACC/AHA
Guidelines for Exercise Testing. A report of the American College of
Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice
Guidelines (Committee on Exercise Testing). J Am Coll Cardiol
30(1): 260–311.
4. Vanzetto G, Ormezzano O, Fagret D, et al. (1999) Long-term additive
prognostic value of thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging over
clinical and exercise stress test in low to intermediate risk patients:
Study in 1137 patients with 6-year follow-up. Circulation 100(14):
1521–7.
5. Iskander S, Iskandrian AE. (1998) Risk assessment using single-
photon emission computed tomographic technetium-99m sestamibi
imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 32(1): 57–62.
6. Fleischmann KE, Hunink MG, Kuntz KM, et al. (1998) Exercise
echocardiography or, exercise SPECT imaging? A meta-analysis of
diagnostic test performance. JAMA 280(10): 913–20.
7. Pletcher MJ, Tice JA, Pignone M, Browner WS. (2004) Using the
coronary artery calcium score to predict coronary heart disease
192
K.G. Dunsky

events: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 164:
1285–1292.
8. Budoff MJ, Achenbachs S, Roger S, et al. (2006) Assessment of coro-
nary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography. A scientific
statement from the American Heart Association Committee on
Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular
Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging,
Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 114 : 1761–1791.
9. O’Connor, Robert E. et al. (2010) Part 10: Acute coronary syndromes:
2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary
Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 122:
S787–S817.
193
Approach to Chest Pain
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
