Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5537_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
22 Мб
Скачать
are transferred from one provider to another within hospital walls and at the time of discharge. Work hour restrictions for house staff and the increased use of hospitalists may be contributing to this trend. In fact, in one teaching institution, residents alone had 300 signouts per month and 4,000 handoffs occurred per day among all providers.
2
In response to this, the Joint Commission has implemented several National Patient Safety Goals relat­ing to handoffs, medication reconciliation at transition points, and discharge communication to better standardize care.
3
While all transitions of care and handoffs are problematic, the process of discharging a patient from an acute setting to home or another care facility can lead to a host of problems, including medication errors, patient dissatisfaction, increased healthcare costs, patient confusion and misunderstanding, and readmission.
The discharge process requires the careful coordination of a multidis­ciplinary team to optimally arrange the needed resources for patients. As patients transition from the hospital to the next level of care, medications are altered, follow-up testing and procedures may be needed, and addi­tional follow-up care involving appointments and therapy is often required. This process takes adequate preparation and coordination to ensure success, and when poorly executed, frequently results in errors. For example, one in five patients experience an adverse event upon dis­charge, the most common of which is an adverse drug events.
5
With sys­tem improvements, as many as two-thirds of these adverse events could be avoided or mitigated.
5
Additionally, over 40% of patients have test results return after they leave the acute setting, with as many as 9% of these returned tests considered actionable.
7
Perhaps more concerning is
that outpatient physicians are unaware of these tests 62% of the time.
7
Physician communication between the inpatient provider and outpatient provider is poor, occurring only 3 to 20% of the time.
8
Similarly, dis­charge summaries are only available at first follow-up 12 to 24% of the time.
8
Moreover, patients with an error in their work-up post-discharge are
6.2 times more likely to be readmitted in the following three months.
6
The fact that almost 20% of Medicare recipients are readmitted within 30 days of hospital discharge suggests that focusing on the discharge transition may be high yield.
4
104
J. Goldenberg, R. Jervis and K. Cunningham
This chapter will review the components needed to transition a patient from the hospital to home, first reviewing the required key features and secondly discussing those interventions considered optional given the intensive resources needed for implementation.

Required Components of the Discharge Process

The ideal discharge process should be a team approach using the com­bined efforts of physicians, nurses, pharmacists and social workers. The team should pay extra attention to the psychosocial aspects of the patient’s care, the acuity of disease, and any barriers to care. The discharge process starts at the time of admission and should include thoughtful planning and teaching on a daily basis until discharge is carried out.
The discharge transition is complex and has many critical compo­nents, as listed in Table 1. The discharge process should always include a careful review of home medications and hospital medications and the gen­eration of a discharge medication list. Follow-up arrangements should be made ideally within seven to 14 days after discharge.
9
Patients given scheduled appointments are more likely to show up for their appointments than patients asked to call to arrange follow-up.
10
Patients with high risk diagnoses (i.e. congestive heart failure) or those patients taking medica­tions that require close monitoring (i.e. warfarin) should be seen in less than one week.
9
Anticipatory guidance in the form of directions to patients, caregivers and providers on which symptoms and signs may occur post-discharge and how to respond should be clearly outlined. Instructions to the patient and next provider should detail any needed tests, studies, or referrals.
6
Any
pending labs at the time of discharge should be explicitly indicated.
6
Patients should receive both clear verbal and written instructions. Written material should be at a 6th grade reading level and should be reinforced by the multidisciplinary team.
11
These instructions should be tailored to the patient’s or care giver’s cognitive level and native language. The technique of teach-back should be employed whenever possible.
12
To perform teach-
back, the teacher asks the learner to repeat back the information they have
105
Transitions of Care: The Hospital Discharge
106
J. Goldenberg, R. Jervis and K. Cunningham
Table 1. Key Components of the Discharge Transition
Key Components Details/Comments
Medication Reconcile home and hospital medications to compile one
Management
11
accurate list of discharge medications.
Clearly identify new medications, changed medications and stopped medications; add indications and explanation for changes whenever possible.
Use a pharmacist when available to assist with process.
Follow-up
9
Schedule within 7–14 days.
High risk diagnoses and medications will require
follow-up in less than 7 days.
Pending Data; Alert patient and next provider about needed follow-up
Follow-up Tests tests, procedures, and pending data and provide. and Procedures
6
anticipatory guidance based on results.
Patient Education
12
Provide clear and simple verbal and written instructions to patient and caregiver.
Tailor to patient’s literacy level and native language whenever possible.
Employ techniques of teach-back to verify understanding.
Emergency Contact • Provide patients with instructions about who to call with
Information questions and which scenarios require medical attention.
Verbal Communication Verbally hand over care at the time of discharge.
to Next Provider
13
Discharge Letter or Complete on the day of discharge and forward to the next
Summary
8
provider before first follow-up visit.
Include:
Problem that led to hospitalization.Discharge diagnosis.Condition at discharge.Key findings and test results.Brief problem-based hospital course.Recommendations and contact information of
subspecialty consultants.
Comprehensive and reconciled discharge medication
list.
Follow-up appointments with names, dates and times
and contact information.
Pending lab work and tests.Contact information for hospitalist.
just learned to confirm understanding.12The patient’s paperwork at dis­charge should be clear, simple, legible, and contain:
Details about the reason for hospital admission
Discharge diagnosis
Relevant tests and procedures
Discharge medications
Follow-up appointments
Anticipatory guidance
Red flags
Emergency contact information
Any transportation needs and other home services (i.e. physical therapy, nursing services) should be carefully considered and arranged. A standard verbal communication in the form of a phone call should be considered mandatory to the receiving provider to highlight any special discharge needs or instructions.
13
Discharge summaries are an important target for improving the dis­charge process, as they are frequently difficult to read, tardy, and lacking in important information regarding the hospitalization. For example, most physicians (between 66% and 88%) do not receive a copy of the discharge summary in time for the patient’s follow up appointment.
8
A quarter of
physicians never receive a discharge summary at all.
8
These discharge summaries are often lacking the primary diagnosis (17.5%), a list of dis­charge medications (21%) and pending test results (65%).
8
Most importantly, a discharge summary must be timely, as a thorough discharge summary is of little value if the patient has contact with a health­care setting before the discharge summary is made available. Ideally, discharge summaries should be completed the day that the patient is dis­charged. Handing the discharge summary to the patient may facilitate the transfer of the discharge summary to the outpatient physician, but this should be done in addition to a more formal transfer of information with the receiving physician. An electronic facsimile or other delivery service to the accepting physician is usually preferred and the mode of delivery should be confirmed during a verbal exchange.
107
Transitions of Care: The Hospital Discharge
The required components of a discharge summary are listed in Table 1. A structured template rather than a free form narrative is the best strategy to produce discharge summaries in an accurate and efficient manner.
14
In one study, structured discharge summaries were shorter (302 versus 619 words) and were rated as having more clinically relevant information.
14
Electronic summaries should be used when available to increase efficiency and decrease the delay imposed by transcription services.
15

Optional Components of the Discharge Process

While every discharge should contain the above key components, addi­tional interventions can be useful and should be considered for high risk patients (i.e. multiple co-morbidities, elderly, congestive heart failure). Optional components of the discharge process are listed in Table 2. These interventions often require increased staffing and organizational support. One such intervention includes follow-up phone calls to patients. These phone calls can help inpatient providers collect information on the dis­charge process and more importantly serve as a venue to field patient ques­tions, clarify medication changes, and understand patient compliance.
16
108
J. Goldenberg, R. Jervis and K. Cunningham
Table 2. Optional Components of the Discharge Transition
Optional Components Details/Comments
Follow-up Phone Calls
16
Can assist in:
Fielding patient questionsResolving medication discrepanciesIdentifying medication side effectsEnsuring compliance with therapy and follow-up
Home Visits with an Initial in hospital visit made by transitional worker
Enhanced Discharge followed by continued home visits and telephone Process
17–20
contact for extended period of time post-discharge.
Emphasis on early response to status changes that could precipitate readmission.
Has been shown to lower health care costs, improve patient satisfaction and reduce hospital readmission.
Another optional intervention is a comprehensive discharge process followed by home visits and telephone contact with the help of a transi­tional care provider. This approach allows for early identification of prob­lems with medications and symptom control and allows for active participation with patients and families.
17–20
The Care Transitions Intervention is a program that uses a “transition coach” to guide patients from the hospital to home.
20
The program starts when the patient is still inpatient and the “transition coach” follows the patient out into commu­nity with both home visits and phone calls. The goals of the intervention include patient (and caregiver) understanding of medications, a self directed and compiled personal health record, scheduled and made fol­low-up appointments, and an understanding of “red flags” and how to respond. These four pillars are emphasized in the hospital, at home visits and by telephone.
20
The authors of this study found that patients in the intervention group had lower 30 and 90 day rehospitalization rates as compared with the control group and lower rehospitalization rates for same condition that precipitated index hospitalization at 90 and 180 days.
20
Another example of success was noted in the Reengineered Discharge Study, known as Project Red. Their intervention uses a nurse “discharge advocate” who assists patients in arranging follow-up, confir­mation of medication reconciliation, and assists with providing discharge information to the next provider.
19
A pharmacist is responsible for a post-
discharge follow-up call at two to four days.
19
The authors found a 30% lower rate of hospital utilization in the intervention group as compared with usual care.
19
These two interventions along with a few other similar approaches have demonstrated reduced hospital readmission rates, decreased health care costs, and increased patient satisfaction.
18–20

Conclusions

The transition from hospital to home is a complex and time-intensive multidisciplinary process. Hospitalists are key players in improving the way this transition occurs. Hospitalists can lead efforts to improve and standardize the transition. Every discharge should contain the discussed
109
Transitions of Care: The Hospital Discharge
key features, highlights of which include medication reconciliation, follow-up arrangements, and communication with the receiving provider. When staffing allows, organizations should consider a more comprehen­sive interventions that may include follow-up phone calls, transitional workers, and home visits.

References

1. Horwitz LI, Moin T, Krumholz HM, et al. (2008) Consequences of inad-
equate sign-out for patient care. Arch Intern Med 168(16): 1755–1760.
2. Triple Handoff, Arpana R. Vidyarthi. AHRQ WebM&M [serial online]. September 2006. Available at: http://webmm.ahrq.gov/case. aspx?caseID=134. Accessed Sept 2010.
3. National Patient Safety Goals. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Available at: http://www.jointcommission. org/PatientSafety/NationalPatientSafetyGoals. Accessed Sept 2010.
4. Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA. (2009) Rehospitalizations among patients in the medicare fee-for-service program. New Eng J Med 360(14): 1418–1428.
5. Forster AJ, Murff HJ, Peterson JF, et al. (2003) The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital. Ann Intern Med 138: 161–167.
6. Moore C, Wisnivesky J, Williams S, McGinn T. (2003) Medical errors related to discontinuity of care from an inpatient to an outpatient set­ting. J Gen Intern Med 18: 646–651.
7. Roy CL, Poon EG, Karson AS, et al. (2005) Improving patient care: Patient safety concerns arising from test results that return after hospital discharge. Ann Intern Med 143: 121–128.
8. Kripalani S, LeFevre F, Phillips CO, et al. (2007) Deficits in communi­cation and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians. JAMA 297: 831–841.
9. Kripalani S, Jackson AT, Schnipper JL, Coleman EA. (2007) Promoting effective transitions of care at hospital discharge: A review of key issues for hospitalists. J Hosp Med 2: 314–323.
110
J. Goldenberg, R. Jervis and K. Cunningham
10. Lowenthal G. (2006) The best way to improve emergency department follow-up is actually to give the patient a specific appointment. J Gen Intern Med 21: 398.
11. Ideal Discharge for the Elderly Patient: A Hospitalist checklist. Available at: http://www.hospitalmedicine.org/AM/Template.cfm? Section=QI_Clinical_Tools&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm& ContentID=10303. Accessed Sept 2010.
12. Shojania KG, Duncan BW, McDonald KM, Wachter RM, (eds).
Making Healthcare Safer: A Critical Analysis of Patient Safety Practices. Evidence Report No. 43 from the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality. AHRQ Publication No. 01-E058 2001.
13. Pantilist SZ, Lindenauer PK, Katz PP, Wachter RM. (2001) Primary care physician attitudes regarding communication with hospitalists. Am J Med 111: 15S–20S.
14. van Walraven C, Duke SM, Weinberg AL, Wells PS. (1998) Standardized or narrative discharge summaries. Which do family physicians prefer? Can Fam Physician 44: 62–69.
15. Bolton P. (1999) A review of the role of information technology in discharge communications in Australia. Aust Health Rev 22: 56–64.
16. Nelson JR. (2001) The importance of postdischarge telephone follow­up for hospitalists: A view from the trenches. Am J Med 111: 43S–44S.
17. Naylor MD, Brooten DA, Campell RL, et al. (2004) Transitional care of older adults hospitalized with heart failure: A randomized, con­trolled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 52: 675–684.
18. Naylor MD, Brooten D, Campbell R, et al. (1999) Comprehensive discharge planning and home follow-up of hospitalized elders: A ran­domized clinical trial. JAMA 281: 613–620.
19. Jack BW, Veerappa KC, Anthony D, et al. (2009) A reengineered hos­pital discharge program to decrease rehospitalization. Ann Intern Med 150: 178–187.
20. Coleman EA, Smith JD, Frank JC, Min S, Parry C, Kramer AM. (2004) Preparing patients and caregivers to participate in care deliv­ered across settings: The care transitions intervention. J Am Geriatr Soc 52(11): 1817–1825.
111
Transitions of Care: The Hospital Discharge
This page intentionally left blankThis page intentionally left blank
Health Informatics for Hospitalists
Anuj K. Dalal* and Kendall Rogers

Key Pearls

Health information technology (HIT) can dramatically improve health-
care quality and safety when effectively designed and implemented.
As a function of the electronic health record (EHR), computerized
physician order entry (CPOE) with clinical decision support (CDS) reduces errors and improves the delivery of evidenced-based medical care.
The importance of EHR functionality to improve patient safety and
quality of care often competes with the need for efficient system design for pharmacy, central supply and administrative services.
Hospitalists should understand the benefits and risks to patient safety
offered by the EHR at their institution.
Hospitalists are uniquely qualified to drive EHR design and imple-
mentation to improve patient safety and quality of care.

Introduction

Practicing hospitalists have first-hand experience with the benefits, pitfalls, and challenges of health information technology (HIT). Most clinicians agree that current technology often does not meet patient’s and provider’s
113
11
Chapter
*Birgham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA.