Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5881_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
10 Composites forDrug-Eluting Devices: Emerging Biomedical Applications
133. Englert, C., etal., Pharmapolymers in the 21st century: Synthetic polymers in drug delivery
applications. Progress in Polymer Science, 2018. 87: p.107–164.
134. Huang, Y., etal., Drug-eluting biostable and erodible stents. Journal of Controlled Release,
2014. 193: p.188–201.
135. Stefanini, G.G., et al., Long-term clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer biolimus-
eluting stents versus durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary
artery disease (LEADERS): 4 year follow-up of a randomised non-inferiority trial. The
Lancet, 2011. 378(9807): p.1940–1948.
136. Upendra, K. and B.Sanjeev, Advantages of novel BioMimeTM Sirolimus Eluting Coronary
Stent system. Moving towards biomimicry. Minerva Cardioangiologica, 2012. 60(1): p.23–31.
137. Kereiakes, D.J., et al., Efcacy and safety of a novel bioabsorbable polymer-coated,
everolimus- eluting coronary stent: the EVOLVE II Randomized Trial. Circulation:
Cardiovascular Interventions, 2015. 8(4): p. e002372.
138. Ulery, B.D., L.S.Nair, and C.T.Laurencin, Biomedical applications of biodegradable poly-
mers. Journal of polymer science Part B: polymer physics, 2011. 49(12): p.832–864.
139. Xiao, L., etal., Poly (lactic acid)-based biomaterials: synthesis, modication and applica-
tions. Biomedical science, engineering and technology, 2012. 11: p.247–282.
140. Avérous, L. and E.Pollet, Environmental silicate nano-biocomposites. Vol. 1. 2012: Springer.
141. Bao, L., etal., Gas permeation properties of poly (lactic acid) revisited. Journal of membrane
science, 2006. 285(1–2): p.166–172.
142. Jain, R.A., The manufacturing techniques of various drug loaded biodegradable poly
(lactide- co-glycolide)(PLGA) devices. Biomaterials, 2000. 21(23): p.2475–2490.
143. Kumari, A., S.K.Yadav, and S.C.Yadav, Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles based drug
delivery systems. Colloids and surfaces B: biointerfaces, 2010. 75(1): p.1–18.
144. Farah, S., D.G.Anderson, and R.Langer, Physical and mechanical properties of PLA, and
their functions in widespread applications—A comprehensive review. Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2016. 107: p.367–392.
145. Da Silva, D., etal., Biocompatibility, biodegradation and excretion of polylactic acid (PLA)
in medical implants and theranostic systems. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018. 340:
p.9–14.
146. Uhrich, K.E., etal., Polymeric systems for controlled drug release. Chemical reviews, 1999.
99(11): p.3181–3198.
147. Ginjupalli, K., etal., Poly (α-hydroxy acid) based polymers: A review on material and degra-
dation aspects. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 2017. 144: p.520–535.
148. Kumar, A. and J.Pillai, Implantable drug delivery systems: An overview. Nanostructures for
the engineering of cells, tissues and organs, 2018: p.473–511.
149. Doppalapudi, S., et al., Biodegradable polymers—an overview. Polymers for Advanced
Technologies, 2014. 25(5): p.427–435.
150. Goonoo, N., etal., Polydioxanone-based bio-materials for tissue engineering and drug/gene
delivery applications. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 2015. 97:
p.371–391.
151. Waksman, R.O.N., etal., Short-term effects of biocorrodible iron stents in porcine coronary
arteries. Journal of interventional cardiology, 2008. 21(1): p.15–20.
152. Jiang, W., etal., Comparison study on four biodegradable polymer coatings for control-
ling magnesium degradation and human endothelial cell adhesion and spreading. ACS
Biomaterials Science & Engineering, 2017. 3(6): p.936–950.
153. Zhang, L., etal., Fabrication and size-selective bioseparation of magnetic silica nanospheres
with highly ordered periodic mesostructure. Advanced Functional Materials, 2008. 18(20):
p.3203–3212.
154. Concheiro, A. and C. Alvarez-Lorenzo, Chemically cross-linked and grafted cyclodextrin
hydrogels: From nanostructures to drug-eluting medical devices. Advanced Drug Delivery
Reviews, 2013. 65(9): p.1188–1203.
305
306
155. Schmidt, H. and M.Mennig, Wet coating technologies for glass. SolGel.com, http://www.
solgel.com/articles/nov00/mennig.htm, 2000.
156. Shanshan, C., etal., Study of drug-eluting coating on metal coronary stent. Materials Science
and Engineering: C, 2013. 33(3): p.1476–1480.
157. Leong, K.W. and R. Langer, Polymeric controlled drug delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery
Reviews, 1988. 1(3): p.199–233.
158. Ammam, M., Electrophoretic deposition under modulated electric elds: a review. Rsc
Advances, 2012. 2(20): p.7633–7646.
159. Nukala, R.K., etal., The application of electrostatic dry powder deposition technology to
coat drug-eluting stents. Pharmaceutical research, 2010. 27: p.72–81.
160. Liu, Y., etal., Advanced stent coating for drug delivery and invivo biocompatibility. Journal
of nanoparticle research, 2013. 15: p.1–16.
161. Simchi, A., et al., Recent progress in inorganic and composite coatings with bactericidal
capability for orthopaedic applications. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and
Medicine, 2011. 7(1): p.22–39.
162. Mandal, S., etal., Laser-assisted nanofabrication of multielement complex oxide core–shell
nanoparticles. Materials & Design, 2022. 220: p.110882.
163. Toh, H.W., et al., Polymer blends and polymer composites for cardiovascular implants.
European Polymer Journal, 2021. 146: p.110249.
164. Ainslie, K.M., C.M.Kraning, and T.A. Desai, Microfabrication of an asymmetric, multi-
layered microdevice for controlled release of orally delivered therapeutics. Lab on a Chip,
2008. 8(7): p.1042–1047.
165. Gupta, A.K., etal., Laser irradiation-induced nanoscale surface transformations in strontium
titanate. Crystals, 2022. 12(5): p.624.
166. Gupta, A.K., S.Gupta, and R.Sachan, Laser irradiation induced atomic structure modica-
tions in strontium titanate. Jom, 2022. 74: p.143–150.
167. Dong, J., etal., Surface engineering and the application of laser-based processes to stents-A
review of the latest development. Bioactive Materials, 2022. 10: p.159–184.
168. Alvarez-Lorenzo, C. and A.Concheiro, Smart drug release from medical devices. Journal of
Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 2019. 370(3): p.544–554.
169. Zhao, W., etal., Shape memory polymers and their composites in biomedical applications.
Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2019. 97: p.864–883.
170. Gupta, A.K., et al., ∑ 3 Twin Boundaries in Gd2Ti2O7 Pyrochlore: Pathways for Oxygen
Migration. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2020. 12(40): p.45558–45563.
171. Rydz, J., A. Šišková, and A.Andicsová Eckstein, Scanning electron microscopy and atomic
force microscopy: Topographic and dynamical surface studies of blends, composites, and
hybrid functional materials for sustainable future. Advances in Materials Science and
Engineering, 2019. 2019.
172. Kumar, A., etal., Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy: Data interpretation and applica-
tions in structure elucidation and analysis of small molecules and nanostructures, in Data
Processing Handbook for Complex Biological Data Sources. 2019, Elsevier. p.77–96.
173. Solangi, N.H., etal., Mechanism of polymer composite-based nanomaterial for biomedical
applications. Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research, 2023.
174. Yusop, A.H., etal., Structure, degradation, drug release and mechanical properties relationships of iron-based drug eluting scaffolds: The effects of PLGA. Materials & design, 2018.
160: p.203–217.
175. Kowalczuk, D. and M.Pitucha, Application of FTIR method for the assessment of immobi-
lization of active substances in the matrix of biomedical materials. Materials, 2019. 12(18):
p.2972.
176. Sharipova, A., et al., Drug-eluting biodegradable metals and metal-ceramic composites:
High strength and delayed drug release. bioRxiv, 2022: p.2022–12.
A. K. Gupta et al.
10 Composites forDrug-Eluting Devices: Emerging Biomedical Applications
177. Lenzuni, M., et al., Dynamic investigation of zein-based degradable and hemocompat-
ible coatings for drug-eluting stents: a microuidic approach. Lab on a Chip, 2023. 23(6):
p.1576–1592.
178. Padmakumar, S., M.M.Varghese, and D.Menon, Differential Drug Release Kinetics from
Paclitaxel-Loaded Polydioxanone Membranes and Capsules. Recent Advances in Drug
Delivery and Formulation: Formerly Recent Patents on Drug Delivery & Formulation, 2022.
16(3): p.241–252.
179. Ordikhani, F., etal., Physicochemical and biological properties of electrodeposited graphene
oxide/chitosan lms with drug-eluting capacity. Carbon, 2015. 84: p.91–102.
180. Wang, Y.X.J., et al., In vivo chemoembolization and magnetic resonance imaging of liver
tumors by using iron oxide nanoshell/doxorubicin/poly (vinyl alcohol) hybrid composites.
Angewandte Chemie, 2014. 126(19): p.4912–4915.
181. Wilson, G.J., etal., Comparison of inammatory response after implantation of sirolimus-and
paclitaxel-eluting stents in porcine coronary arteries. Circulation, 2009. 120(2): p.141–149.
182. Li, X., etal., Corrosion resistance of dicalcium phosphate dihydrate/poly (lactic-co-glycolic
acid) hybrid coating on AZ31 magnesium alloy. Corrosion Science, 2016. 102: p.209–221.
183. Deng, X., Development of Drug-Eluting Surgical Sutures for the Wound-Healing Process
Using Melt Extrusion Technology. 2020.
184. Chakraborty, S., etal., Studies on nano-metal dispersed Cu-Cr matrix composite. Materials
Letters, 2019. 257: p.126739.
185. Kačuráková, M., et al., Molecular interactions in bacterial cellulose composites studied
by 1D FT-IR and dynamic 2D FT-IR spectroscopy. Carbohydrate research, 2002. 337(12):
p.1145–1153.
186. Ding, Y., etal., Electrospun brous architectures for drug delivery, tissue engineering and
cancer therapy. Advanced Functional Materials, 2019. 29(2): p.1802852.
187. Sun, L., et al., Tailoring materials with specic wettability in biomedical engineering.
Advanced Science, 2021. 8(19): p.2100126.
188. Govindarajan, R., D.P.Singh, and A.K.S.Rawat, High-performance liquid chromatographic
method for the quantication of phenolics in ‘Chyavanprash’a potent Ayurvedic drug. Journal
of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 2007. 43(2): p.527–532.
189. Gupta, A., etal. Design and analysis of vertical vacuum fryer. Springer.
190. Choudhari, A., etal. Design and Development of Vacuum Frying Machine for the Production
of High-Quality Fried Products. Springer.
191. Kilcup, N., etal., Composition-property relationships for radiopaque composite materials:
pre-loaded drug-eluting beads for transarterial chemoembolization. Journal of Biomaterials
Applications, 2015. 30(1): p.93–103.
192. Shi, E., etal., Chronic inammation, cognitive impairment, and distal brain region alteration
following intracerebral hemorrhage. The FASEB Journal, 2019. 33(8): p.9616–9626.
193. Frenț, O.D., et al., Preparation and characterization of chitosan-alginate microspheres
loaded with quercetin. Polymers, 2022. 14(3): p.490.
194. Chopra, L., et al., Multifunctional Modied Chitosan Biopolymers for Dual Applications
in Biomedical and Industrial Field: Synthesis and Evaluation of Thermal, Chemical,
Morphological, Structural, In Vitro Drug-Release Rate, Swelling and Metal Uptake Studies.
Sensors, 2022. 22(9): p.3454.
195. Brown, M.E. and P.K. Gallagher, Handbook of thermal analysis and calorimetry: recent
advances, techniques and applications. 2011.
196. Alothman, O.Y., et al., Fabrication and characterization of polylactic acid/natural ber
extruded composites. Polymer Engineering & Science, 2023. 63(4): p.1234–1245.
197. Paarakh, M.P., et al., Release kinetics–concepts and applications. International Journal of
Pharmacy Research & Technology (IJPRT), 2018. 8(1): p.12–20.
198. Malekjani, N. and S.M.Jafari, Modeling the release of food bioactive ingredients from car-
riers/nanocarriers by the empirical, semiempirical, and mechanistic models. Comprehensive
Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 2021. 20(1): p.3–47.
307
308
199. Shoaib, M.H., etal., Evaluation of drug release kinetics from ibuprofen matrix tablets using
HPMC. Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2006. 19(2): p.119–124.
200. Li, F., et al., In vitro release study of sirolimus from a PDLLA matrix on a bioresorbable
drug-eluting stent. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, 2018. 48: p.88–95.
201. Zhang, H., etal., Drug release kinetics from a drug-eluting stent with asymmetrical coat.
Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark, 2017. 22(3): p.407–415.
202. Chakravarty, K. and D.C.Dalal, An analytical study of drug release kinetics from a degrad-
able polymeric matrix. International Journal of Biomathematics, 2018. 11(01): p.1850011.
203. Kamaly, N., et al., Degradable controlled-release polymers and polymeric nanoparticles:
mechanisms of controlling drug release. Chemical reviews, 2016. 116(4): p.2602–2663.
204. Belu, A., C.Mahoney, and K.Wormuth, Chemical imaging of drug eluting coatings: combin-
ing surface analysis and confocal Raman microscopy. Journal of Controlled Release, 2008.
126(2): p.111–121.
205. Mohammed, A., etal., Additive manufacturing technologies for drug delivery applications.
International journal of pharmaceutics, 2020. 580: p.119245.
206. Borandeh, S., etal., Polymeric drug delivery systems by additive manufacturing. Advanced
drug delivery reviews, 2021. 173: p.349–373.
207. Choudhari, A., etal. Designing and Prototyping for Conservation and Effective Utilization
of Waste Heat from Air Conditioner. in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and
Engineering. 2021. IOP Publishing.
208. Talkar, S., A.Choudhari, and P.Rayar. Building Envelope Optimization and Cost-Effective
Approach in HVAC to Support Smart Manufacturing. in Proceedings of International
Conference on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation. 2020. Springer.
209. Zhang, J., etal., Pharmaceutical additive manufacturing: a novel tool for complex and personalized drug delivery systems. AAPS PharmSciTech, 2018. 19: p.3388–3402.
210. Preis, M., J.Breitkreutz, and N.Sandler, Perspective: Concepts of printing technologies for
oral lm formulations. International journal of pharmaceutics, 2015. 494(2): p.578–584.
211. Zhang, Y., etal., 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds with antibacterial and osteogenic activity.
Biofabrication, 2017. 9(2): p.025037.
212. Akmal, J.S., etal., Implementation of industrial additive manufacturing: Intelligent implants
and drug delivery systems. Journal of functional biomaterials, 2018. 9(3): p.41.
213. Tan, D.K., M.Maniruzzaman, and A.Nokhodchi, Advanced pharmaceutical applications of
hot-melt extrusion coupled with fused deposition modelling (FDM) 3D printing for personalised drug delivery. Pharmaceutics, 2018. 10(4): p.203.
214. Gioumouxouzis, C.I., etal., A 3D printed bilayer oral solid dosage form combining metformin for prolonged and glimepiride for immediate drug delivery. European Journal of
Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2018. 120: p.40–52.
215. Farto-Vaamonde, X., etal., Post-manufacture loading of laments and 3D printed PLA scaf-
folds with prednisolone and dexamethasone for tissue regeneration applications. European
Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 2019. 141: p.100–110.
216. Mota, C., etal., Additive manufacturing techniques for the production of tissue engineering
constructs. Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2015. 9(3): p.174–190.
217. Datta A, Kumar A, Kumar A, Kumar A, Singh VP (2022) Advanced materials in biological
implants and surgical tools. In: Advanced Materials for Biomedical Applications. CRC Press,
pp.21–43.
218. Kumar A, Datta A, Kumar A, Kumar A (2022a) Recent advancements and future trends in
next-generation materials for biomedical applications. In: Advanced Materials for Biomedical
Applications. CRC Press, pp.1–19.
219. Kumar A, Datta S, Kalyanasundaram D (2016a) Liquid slippage in conned ows: Effect
of periodic micropatterns of arbitrary pitch and amplitude. In: ASME 2016 5th International
Conference on Micro/Nanoscale Heat and Mass Transfer, MNHMT 2016.
220. Kumar A, Datta S, Kalyanasundaram D (2016b) Permeability and effective slip in conned
ows transverse to wall slippage patterns. Phys Fluids 28.
A. K. Gupta et al.
10 Composites forDrug-Eluting Devices: Emerging Biomedical Applications
221. Kumar A, Datta S, Kalyanasundaram D (2018a) Reduction of hydraulic friction in conned ows by laser texturing: Experiments and theoretical validation. In: ASME 2018 16th
International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels, ICNMM 2018.
222. Madrid, A.P.M., etal., Advances in additive manufacturing for bone tissue engineering scaf-
folds. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2019. 100: p.631–644.
223. Qu, H., Additive manufacturing for bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Materials Today
Communications, 2020. 24: p.101024.
224. Farré-Guasch, E., etal., Application of additive manufacturing in oral and maxillofacial sur-
gery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2015. 73(12): p.2408–2418.
225. Kumar A, Datta S, Kalyanasundaram D (2018b) Liquid Slippage in Conned Flows: Effect
of Periodic Micropatterns of Arbitrary Pitch and Amplitude. J Heat Transfer 140.
226. Kumar A, Datta S, Kalyanasundaram D (2016c) Liquid slippage in con ned ows: effect of
periodic micropatterns of arbitrary pitch and amplitude. In: ASME 2016 5th Micro/Nanoscale
Heat and Mass Transfer International Conference (MNHMT2016), Biopolis, Singapore.
227. Kumar A, Gangwar AKS, Kumar A, Meena CS, Singh VP, Dutt N, Prasad A, Gori Y (2022b)
Biomedical study of femur bone fracture and healing. In: Advanced Materials for Biomedical
Applications. CRC Press, pp.235–250.
228. Kumar A, Gupta A, Kant R, Akhtar SN, Tiwari N, Ramkumar J, Bhattacharya S (2013)
Optimization of laser machining process for the preparation of photomasks, and its application to microsystems fabrication. J Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, MOEMS 12.
229. Kumar A, Keerti S, Jain J, Sinha S, Tekumalla S, Gupta M (2018c) Investigations of Wear
Response of Pure Mg and Mg-0.4 Ce-Y2O3/ZnO Nanocomposites Using a Single and
Repeated Scratch Tests. Tribol Trans 61:951–959.
230. Kumar A, Panda U (2022) Microuidics-based devices and their role on point-of-care testing.
In: Biosensor Based Advanced Cancer Diagnostics. Elsevier, pp.197–224.
231. Zadpoor, A.A. and J. Malda, Additive manufacturing of biomaterials, tissues, and organs.
2017, Springer. p.1–11.
232. Garot, C., G.Bettega, and C.Picart, Additive manufacturing of material scaffolds for bone
regeneration: toward application in the clinics. Advanced functional materials, 2021. 31(5):
p.2006967.
233. Kumar A, Panda U, Patel VK, Kant R (2022c) Laser-Assisted Fabrication of Polymers by
Pushing Down the Limit of Resolution. Trends Fabr Polym Polym Compos 1–3.
234. Kumar A, Parihar A, Basha SN, Panda U (2022d) Clinically available/under trial drugs and
vaccines for treatment of SARS-COV-2. In: Computational Approaches for Novel Therapeutic
and Diagnostic Designing to Mitigate SARS-CoV2 Infection. Elsevier, pp.451–488.
235. Kumar A, Parihar A, Panda U, Parihar DS (2022e) Microuidics-based point-of-care testing
(POCT) devices in dealing with waves of COVID-19 pandemic: The emerging solution. ACS
Appl Bio Mater 5:2046–2068.
236. Gaharwar, A.K., et al., 2D nanoclay for biomedical applications: regenerative medicine,
therapeutic delivery, and additive manufacturing. Advanced Materials, 2019. 31(23):
p.1900332.
237. Sheoran, A.J., etal., Bio-medical applications of additive manufacturing: a review. Procedia
Manufacturing, 2020. 51: p.663–670.
238. Dhavalikar, P., etal., Biomedical applications of additive manufacturing, in Biomaterials
Science. 2020, Elsevier. p.623–639.
239. Davoodi, P., etal., Drug delivery systems for programmed and on-demand release. Advanced
drug delivery reviews, 2018. 132: p.104–138.
240. Kumar A, Pathak A, Kumar A, Kumar A (2023a) Physics of Laser--Matter Interaction in
Laser-Based Manufacturing. In: Laser-based Technologies for Sustainable Manufacturing.
CRC Press, pp.45–54.
241. Kumar A, Sharma AK, Katiyar JK (2023b) State-of-the-Art in Sustainable Machining of
Different Materials Using Nano Minimum Quality Lubrication (NMQL). Lubricants 11:64.
309
310
242. Kumar A, Shrama AK, Gupta TVK, Katiyar JK (2022f) Inuence of hexagonal boron nitride
additive nanocutting uid on the machining of AA6061-T6 alloy using minimum quality
lubrication. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng 09544089221110980.
243. Kumar S, Verma RK, Kumar A, Patel VK (2022g) Importance of Chemically Treated Natural
Fibers in the Fabrication of Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites. Trends Fabr
Polym Polym Compos 10–11.
244. Leventini SD, Martin-Gutierrez BS, Kumar A, Mittman AS, Kim SM, Martini A (2022) Tactile
Perception of Vellum Quantied by Friction and Surface Roughness. Tribol Lett 70:127.
245. Thomas, N.G., et al., Toxicity Evaluation and Biocompatibility of Nanostructured
Biomaterials, in Cytotoxicity. 2023, IntechOpen.
246. Bergstrand, M., etal., A semi-mechanistic modeling strategy to link invitro and invivo drug
release for modied release formulations. Pharmaceutical research, 2012. 29: p.695–706.
247. Teixeira, M.O., J.C.Antunes, and H.P.Felgueiras, Recent advances in ber–hydrogel com-
posites for wound healing and drug delivery systems. Antibiotics, 2021. 10(3): p.248.
248. Wang, J., etal., Emerging 3D printing technologies for drug delivery devices: Current status
and future perspective. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2021. 174: p.294–316.
249. Frketic, J., T. Dickens, and S.Ramakrishnan, Automated manufacturing and processing of
ber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites: An additive review of contemporary and modern techniques for advanced materials manufacturing. Additive Manufacturing, 2017. 14:
p.69–86.
250. Efferth, T. and E. Koch, Complex interactions between phytochemicals. The multi-target
therapeutic concept of phytotherapy. Current drug targets, 2011. 12(1): p.122–132.
251. Anighoro, A., J. Bajorath, and G.Rastelli, Polypharmacology: challenges and opportuni-
ties in drug discovery: miniperspective. Journal of medicinal chemistry, 2014. 57(19):
p.7874–7887.
252. Jayaraman, P., et al., Controlled release of drugs in electrosprayed nanoparticles for bone
tissue engineering. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2015. 94: p.77–95.
253. Mehra AK, Saini R, Kumar A (2021) The effect of bre contents on mechanical and moisture absorption properties of gourd sponge/coir bre reinforced epoxy hybrid composites.
Compos Commun 25:100732.
254. Parihar A, Kumar A, Panda U, Khan R, Parihar DS, Khan R (2023) Cryopreservation: A
Comprehensive Overview, Challenges, and Future Perspectives. Adv Biol 2200285.
255. Parihar A, Pandita V, Kumar A, Parihar DS, Puranik N, Bajpai T, Khan R (2021) 3D Printing:
Advancement in Biogenerative Engineering to Combat Shortage of Organs and Bioapplicable
Materials. Regen Eng Transl Med 1–27.
256. Parmar V, Kumar A, Mani Sankar M, Datta S, Vijaya Prakash G, Mohanty S,
Kalyanasundaram D (2018) Oxidation facilitated antimicrobial ability of laser micro-textured titanium alloy against gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus for biomedical applications. J Laser Appl 30.
257. Parmar V, Kumar A, Prakash GV, Datta S, Kalyanasundaram D (2019) Investigation, modelling and validation of material separation mechanism during ber laser machining of medical
grade titanium alloy Ti6Al4V and stainless steel SS316L.Mech Mater 137.
258. Pathak A, Kumar A, Kumar A, Kumar A (2023) Application of Laser Technology in the
Mechanical and Machine Manufacturing Industry. In: Laser-based Technologies for
Sustainable Manufacturing. CRC Press, pp.107–155.
259. Samimi Gharaie, S., S.M.H.Dabiri, and M.Akbari, Smart shear-thinning hydrogels as inject-
able drug delivery systems. Polymers, 2018. 10(12): p.1317.
260. Naveena, N., etal., Biomimetic composites and stem cells interaction for bone and cartilage
tissue regeneration. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2012. 22(12): p.5239–5253.
261. Gao, G., etal., 3D printing of pharmaceutical application: drug screening and drug delivery.
Pharmaceutics, 2021. 13(9): p.1373.
262. Filippi, M., etal., Integrated Closed-loop Control of Bio-actuation for Proprioceptive Bio-
hybrid Robots. bioRxiv, 2024: p.2024-01.
A. K. Gupta et al.
10 Composites forDrug-Eluting Devices: Emerging Biomedical Applications
263. Malik, A., etal., Bionanomaterials for Sensors, Actuators, Drug Delivery, and Their Medical
Applications, in Bionanomaterials for Biosensors, Drug Delivery, and Medical Applications.
CRC Press. p.252–268.
264. Lucignani, G., Nanoparticles for concurrent multimodality imaging and therapy: the dawn
of new theragnostic synergies. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging,
2009. 36: p.869–874.
265. Domenico, A., etal., De novo drug design of targeted chemical libraries based on articial
intelligence and pair-based multiobjective optimization. Journal of Chemical Information
and Modeling, 2020. 60(10): p.4582–4593.
266. Saurabh Gupta, Ruchika Saini, Abhishek Kumar, Prateek Shrivastava, (2020) Performance
Analysis of Gudgeon Pin of Various Cross Sections by FEM. Int J Recent Technol Eng
8:4569–4573.
267. Shrivastava Prateek SR, Kumar A, others (2020) Investigation of Torsional Rod to Minimize
Vibration in Automobile using ANSYS.In: 2020 1st International Conference on Innovative
Research in Applied Science, Engineering and Technology (IRASET). pp.1–6.
268. Singh M, Kumar A, Khan AR (2020) Capillary as a liquid diode. Phys Rev Fluids 5:102101.
269. Singh RK, Kumar A, Kant R, Gupta A, Suresh E, Bhattacharya S (2014b) Design and fabrication of 3-dimensional helical structures in polydimethylsiloxane for ow control applications. Microsyst Technol 20:101–111.
270. Subramanian Y, Gajendiran J, Veena R, Azad AK, Sabarish VCB, Muhammed Ali SA, Kumar
A, Gubendiran RK (2023) Structural, Photoabsorption and Photocatalytic Characteristics of
BiFeO3-WO3 Nanocomposites: An Attempt to Validate the Experimental Data Through
SVM-Based Articial Intelligence (AI). J Electron Mater 1–11.
271. Vats P, Gajrani KK, Kumar A (2023) Laser-Based Additive Manufacturing. In: Laser-based
Technologies for Sustainable Manufacturing. CRC Press, pp.67–83.
311
Chapter 11
Biological Smart Biomaterials: Materials
forBiomedical Applications
SaswatChowdhury , NipunJain , YusufOlatunjiWaidi ,
RanjitBarua , SamirDas , ArbindPrasad , andSudiptoDatta
Abstract In the Biomedical engineering domain, the use of smart biomaterials has
a huge impact. These biomaterials own different features that respond to the surrounding changes, allowing them to be used in various biomedical therapeutic applications. They are sensitive to external stimulations like temperature, light, pH,
magnetic and electric elds, etc. Also, these materials are biocompatible, biodegradable, and less expensive. The development, analysis, and synthesis of these materials have shown notable progress in biomedical applications in the past few decades.
These SMART materials are used to develop wound healing scaffolds, drug delivery
systems, and implants. SMART materials have huge opportunities for changing biological applications. In this book chapter, we will briey discuss various SMART
materials, their advancement in the biomedical engineering domain, applications of
these materials with 3D and 4D bioprinting, the challenges, and prospects.
Saswat Chowdhury, Nipun Jain and Yusuf Olatunji Waidi contributed equally with all other
contributors.
S. Chowdhury
Department of Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
e-mail: saswatc@iisc.ac.in
N. Jain · Y. O. Waidi · S. Datta (*)
Department of Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Science,
Bangalore, Karnataka, India
e-mail: nipunjain@iisc.ac.in; yusufwaidi@iisc.ac.in
R. Barua
Centre for Healthcare Science and Technology, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and
Technology, Howrah, West Bengal, India
S. Das
Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering Lab, School of Medical Science and Technology Indian
Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India
A. Prasad
Mechanical Engineering Department, Katihar Engineering College (Under Department of
Science, Technology and Technical Education, Government of Bihar), Katihar, Bihar, India
A. Kumar et al. (eds.), Applications of Biotribology in Biomedical Systems,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58327-8_11
313© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024
314
S. Chowdhury et al.
Keywords Smart biomaterials · 3D bioprinting · 4D printing · Shape memory
alloy · Polymers · Tissue engineering
11.1 Introduction
Responding to stimulation is a fundamental process in the scientic world.
According to nature’s lessons, researchers have created valuable substances responsive to external response change. These retaliations emerge as alterations to shape,
surface properties, solubility, the creation of a complicated structure, a sol-gel transition, and so on. The adjective “Smart” means the substances are able to notice
uctuations in surroundings and later act upon these modications in a predened
fashion [1]. Smart materials can refer to materials that can change their shape, function, or any other property in a controlled fashion upon external stimulation externally. In the biological context, the smart material in question also needs to be
biocompatible, i.e., it should not elicit any unwanted response from the tissue.
Considering that the biological systems are dynamic in nature, the biomaterials
must also be able to modify their properties based on the stimulus, externally
imposed, or changes in the surrounding milieu. The stimulus can range from physical, such as heat, magnetic eld, light, electrical, and mechanical strain, to chemical, such as pH, water, and analyte concentration. The change in the property can
either be reversible, i.e., the material can recover to its initial state upon withdrawal
of the external stimulus, or irreversible, which means the material is permanently
locked in the changed state. The most widely used class of smart substances are
shape-memory alloys and polymers [2]. Apart from these, there are other special
classes of smart materials, such as self-healing polymers, water-responsive shapechanging hydrogels, shape-changing composites, piezoelectric materials, etc.
The transitions across different phases of the smart material demonstrate various
characteristics due to changes in temperature or loading conditions. The shape
memory effect describes how the structures return to their predened shapes when
heated. Superelasticity describes the phenomena in which the structures undertake
considerable deformations but still restore their shape following unloading [3]. The
latest developments in stimuli-responsive design have opened the door to new biomedical uses. Stimuli-responsive alterations allow for their innovative uses in delivering medicines, biological engineering, and biomimetic actuators. This chapter
deals with different classes of smart materials, their principles of change in property, stimulation, the interaction of the material with stimulus, the role of modeling
in property change, and nally, the biological applications of these smart materials.
The focus is restricted to a brief review of the technology, material requirements,
classication of smart materials, and application.
11 Biological Smart Biomaterials: Materials forBiomedical Applications
315
11.2 Shape Memory Alloys (SMA)
The fascinating journey of shape-memory alloys (SMA) started in 1932 with Chang
and Read’s discovery of a reversible phase transformation in AuCd. However, practical applications only took off in 1962 when Buechler etal. stumbled upon the
shape memory effect in NiTi (Nitinol) at the Naval Ordnance Laboratory. Nitinol
quickly rose to prominence due to its superior thermomechanical properties and
superelasticity compared to other SMAs. At its core, the magic of SMAs lies in their
ability to exist in two distinct phases: austenite at high temperatures with a cubic
structure and martensite at lower temperatures, which can adopt various asymmetric
parallelogram structures (up to 24 variations). SMA exhibits fascinating properties
like shape memory and superelasticity, triggered by temperature or stress-induced
phase transformations between two distinct crystal structures: austenite and martensite. The shape memory effect emerges when a deformed SMA, cooled to stabilize the martensitic phase, is reheated. This triggers a transformation to the austenite
phase, restoring the material to its original “memory” shape. In contrast, superelasticity arises when an austenitic SMA is subjected to stress. This stress induces a
detwinning mechanism within the martensitic phase, where different martensite
variants transform into a single variant that maximizes elongation. Notably, the
twinned martensitic structure is weaker due to its parallelogram arrangement, allowing signicant deformation. Conversely, the austenitic phase exhibits greater stress
resistance with its single possible orientation.
SMA are versatile metals with unique properties like shape memory, superelasticity, and damping. These properties make them valuable in diverse elds [4], from
aerospace (tougher composites) [5] to medicine (smart stents). SMAs can function
as memory elements, actuators, or superelastic materials, expanding their application potential [6]. SMA shines in the biomedical world due to their biocompatibility,
preventing infections and seamlessly integrating with the body. Their impressive
mechanical properties make them ideal for implants in orthopedics and orthodontics
[7]. Simon lter, a pioneering SMA device, lters blood clots and has inspired
numerous next-generation devices like stents, cava lters, and even articial heart
activators. These “smart” materials, with their ability to deform and regain shape on
cue, these “smart” materials offer minimally invasive alternatives to traditional surgeries, saving lives and revolutionizing healthcare [8]. SMAs bone plates speed
healing with temperature-activated compression, which is ideal for facial bones and
the spine [9]. They offer a tight t, stable pressure, and precise vertebral positioning,
perfect for areas where casts are impractical; even physiotherapy benets from their
controlled stress, aiding muscle recovery [10]. NiTi alloys revolutionized orthodontics (1915) with their unique “memory” and gentle forces. These smart wires, stable
in the mouth, gradually guide teeth into alignment, making treatment more comfortable and efcient. They also nd use in implants, ensuring better xation thanks to
the shape memory effect. Beyond dentistry, shape memory polyurethanes with
phase-separated structures hold promise for various applications [11]. Additionally,