Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5526_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
29 Мб
Скачать
30 Headache Attributed toPituitary Apoplexy
285
The headache pathogenesis in an apoplexy can be multifactorial: (a) with the vascular changes taking place in the sella, a sudden surge in the sellar pressure, distending its meningeal walls is a possible mechanism—this hypothesis is rein­forced by the fact that sellar decompression is usually able to improve this symp­tom, and (b) the hemorrhagic changes happening within the sella may reach the subarachnoidal space. Both hypotheses uphold in the case presented: intraoperative ndings consistent with elevated intrasellar pressure were seen in our patient, as well as meningeal signs at admission and a certain amount of blood in the basal cisterns was deemed present in the initial CT.Although transop intrasellar pressure recordings have been reported, this method still awaits further validation [5] to become routinely used.

30.4 Differential Diagnosis

Because pituitary apoplexy syndrome may share a commonality of symptoms and signs with other common neurological emergencies such as subarachnoid hemor­rhage, bacterial meningitis or stroke [3], this diagnosis may be delayed or missed.
Most apoplexies seem spontaneous, but causal roles have been identied in up to 40% of cases [3]. These range from the most frequent—hypertension—through a wide array of contributing factors, including dopamine agonist therapy (bromocrip­tine and cabergoline) [1], estrogen treatment, radiation therapy of pituitary tumors [1], head trauma, thrombocytopenia, lymphocytic leukemia, sickle cell anemia [4], pregnancy, arteriography, lumbar puncture, myelography, pneumoencephalography, recent surgery, use of anticoagulants, increased intracranial pressure, and pituitary function tests [1, 18], to the least common—major surgery [3]; causal factors abound.
Factors implied on the pathogenesis of apoplexy include (a) the close relation­ship between the portal vessels and the diaphragm sellae, (b) the critical size of a tumor inside a semi-rigid sella and (c) the tumor metabolic activity versus its vascu­larization. Some other factors seem to be implied in specic cases. Vascular endo­thelial growth factor messenger RNA may be increased, particularly in nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas [4].
All these factors for pituitary apoplexy can be arranged into four groups: (a) vascular ux reduction (as in surgical procedures, radiotherapy and after spinal anesthesia), (b) acute increase in blood ow (physical activity and systemic hyper­tension), (c) pituitary stimulation (as in pituitary function tests), and (d) coagulation disturbances (thrombocytopenia and anticoagulation) [4].
Considering the association of apoplexy and pituitary function tests [18], one should remember that the thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) effect in elevating serum norepinephrine may trigger vasospasm. It can also act directly activating the tumor cells, resulting in higher metabolic demand. Both effects being therefore implicated in apoplectic events.
In apoplexy related to dopamine agonists therapy (bromocriptine and cabergo­line) [1], the resulting apoptosis of lactotroph cells reduces metabolic demands and
286
C. Martins et al.
angiogenesis is inhibited, but it is the imbalance between the two that leads to infarctions with hemorrhage or hemorrhage only [1]. In bromocriptine long-term usage, it is the rapid shrinkage of tumor cells and perivascular accumulation of uid the implicated factors. The disruption of tissue textures seems to be the factor caus­ing hemorrhage within the lesion, but the hypotension induced effect caused by this drug has also been suggested as causal factor in the circulatory disturbances within the capillaries of the region [18]. Cystic degeneration within the prolactinoma which is being treated with a dopamine antagonist, particularly cabergoline, signals previous intratumoral hemorrhage and is considered a predisposition to the develop­ment clinical pituitary apoplexy [1].

30.5 Diagnosis

Unenhanced tomogram (CT) is often the rst study performed. Although it is fairly sensitive to demonstrate the sellar lesion, usually disclosing a variably hyperdense mass in the sella [6] and suprasellar regions, it is not infrequent that it fails in pre­senting a small hemorrhage or infarction [18]; therefore, it is the combination of an acute syndrome and a sellar tumor on CT that underscores the diagnosis of pituitary apoplexy and treatment decisions can be made with CT in centers where MRI is not readily available.
MRI is considered the exam of choice and can identify intrinsic hemorrhage, necrosis and provide data on adjacent structures [6]. The ndings will depend on the size of tumor, extent of hemorrhage/necrosis, and timing of examination, because—like hemorrhage elsewhere in the brain—the MRI appearance depends on the stage of hemoglobin degradation. Gadolinium IV administration discloses areas of necrosis or infarct that—differently from normal pituitary tissue—stays hypointense.
Endocrinologic assessment involves establishing a hormonal serum prole (serum prolactin, testosterone/estrogen, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, free thyroxine, thyroid stimulating hormone, growth hormone, insulin­like growth factor-1 and cortisol).
Preop evaluation includes blood count, kidney and liver function, electrolytes, glucose, and coagulation prole.
Early register of the visual elds should be obtained whenever possible but should not postpone treatment. This rationale is based on the observation that sig­nicant improvement has been observed in patients rendered blind by the apoplexy if early decompression is undertaken [3]. Campimetry studies performed on the days following surgery can be used as set-point for visual eld follow-up, because although improvement is seen in the immediate postoperative period, it often con­tinues for several weeks afterwards [3].
30 Headache Attributed toPituitary Apoplexy
287

30.6 Treatment

Although alleviating the headache is undoubtedly a focus in the management of these patients, it is not the main priority:
Pituitary apoplexy is a life-threatening complication in which reaching clinical stability, relief of the elevated intracranial pressure, and decompression of the opti­cal apparatus takes clear precedence and should not be delayed longer than the time to stabilize the patient. It is also true that because of the pathogenesis involved in this type of headache (Table30.1), prioritizing the goal just presented also relieves the headache.
It has been a rule of thumb in the eld that if the apoplectic patient has no visual decits or is making neurological improvements, a conservative treatment may be established. Surgical intervention, by an experienced surgical team, is required whenever the patient presents with visual decits or deteriorates within the frame of a previously established conservative treatment. Visual eld defects and ocular palsy seem to benet the most from surgical treatment, but there is also a tendency for a protective effect of surgery on visual acuity and pituitary function [19]. Intractable headaches were also listed as indications for surgery in 7.7% of pituitary apoplexy patients [4], but are usually seconded by other indications for surgery.
A lot has been debated about the timing of surgery in apoplectic patients [3, 20]. Urgent decompressive transsphenoidal surgery [4] is the denomination given for the surgical treatment performed within hours (in a semi-elective regimen, as reported in our patient), on the same day or a maximum of 24hours after the ictus. It is our experience, as well as others [4] that timing of surgery and extent of preop decits are important factors inuencing the nal outcome of these patients, and consider­ing headache, early surgery results in prompt control or shortening of the analgesic requirements. A semi-elective regimen takes advantage of a harmonic structure existing within a neurosurgical department in which—while the patient is being stabilized and initially evaluated by the on-call neurosurgical and ICU teams—the group with experience in sellar surgery and handling of the specic equipment is being deployed, in a sequential fashion, to benet the patient and provide prompt and qualied care as have happened in our case-example.
Surgery (transcranial, transsphenoidal microscopic or endoscopic) resulted in improvement of visual function in 73–80% of cases [18, 21], but the best results are to be expected the sooner visual decompression is performed, particularly in patients presenting with blindness [21]. The goals of the procedure should be debulking of the lesion and decompression of intracranial structures, while avoiding complica­tions that may keep the patient in the ICU, as postoperative stula (and the follow­ing meningitis) or diabetes insipidus.
Transient diabetes insipidus is noted in the postoperative period in up to 16% of patients with pituitary apoplexy [3]. In our department, besides the usual monitor­ing of serum indicators, urinary output and density have been carefully followed, sometimes only to witness an interval of insufciency that is but a few hours-long and swiftly recovered in the cases in which the pituitary gland and its stalk are
288
C. Martins et al.
anatomically preserved, suggesting that in fact transient diabetes insipidus can be much more frequent than reported in literature. However, diabetes insipidus is a dreaded complication to be dealt with when it is permanent, taking a considerable tool on the life of the patient, family, and on the health system.

30.7 Conclusion

Patients with pituitary apoplexy should have endocrine, biochemical assessment of pituitary function, formal assessment of visual acuity and elds four to eight weeks after the event. MRIs are recommended three to six months after apoplexy and annually for ve years, then two-yearly.
Residual tumor should be followed. Tumor regression after apoplexy is a well­known phenomenon with a clear pathophysiology but is denitely not a done deal. The fate of such a tumor after apoplexy lies on its molecular signature, size of resi­due, and extent of hemorrhage or infarction [8] and recurrences are also recognized. In such cases, redo surgery or radiotherapy might be indicated [3], depending on the type of lesion.

References

1. Chng E, Dalan R.Pituitary apoplexy associated with cabergoline therapy. J Clin Neurosci. 2013;20:1637–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2013.02.027.
2. Laws E.Surgical management of pituitary apoplexy. In: Primer on cerebrovascular diseases. Academic; 1997.
3. Rajasekaran S, Vanderpump M, Baldeweg S, Drake W, Reddy N, Lanyon M, etal. UK guide­lines for the management of pituitary apoplexy pituitary apoplexy guidelines development group: may 2010. Clin Endocrinol. 2011;74:9–20.
.03913.x.
4. Gondim JA, de Albuquerque LAF, Almeida JP, Bulcao T, Gomes E, Schops M, et al. Endoscopic Endonasal surgery for treatment of pituitary apoplexy: 16 years of experience in a specialized pituitary Center. World Neurosurg. 2017;108:137–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
wneu.2017.08.131.
5. Jahangiri A, Wagner JR, Chin AT, Han SW, Tran MT, Miller LM, etal. Incidence of headache as a presenting complaint in over 1000 patients with sellar lesions and factors predicting post­operative improvement. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015;132:16–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
clineuro.2015.02.006.
6. Chapman PR, Singhal A, Gaddamanugu S, Prattipati V.Neuroimaging of the pituitary gland: practical anatomy and pathology. Radiol Clin North Am. 2020;58:1115–33. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.rcl.2020.07.009.
7. Martinez-Perez R, Kortz MW, Carroll BW, Duran D, Neill JS, Luzardo GD, etal. Coronavirus disease 2019 and pituitary apoplexy: a single-Center case series and review of the literature. World Neurosurg. 2021;152:e678–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.06.004.
8. Almeida JP, Sanchez MM, Karekezi C, Warsi N, Fernández-Gajardo R, Panwar J, etal. Pituitary apoplexy: results of surgical and conservative management clinical series and review of the literature. World Neurosurg. 2019;130:e988–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.055.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2265.2010
30 Headache Attributed toPituitary Apoplexy
9. Oyesiku NM, Tindall GT. Pituitary apoplexy: syndromes and surgical management. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1997;99:S243–4.
10. Rosso M, Ramaswamy S, Sucharew H, Vagal A, Anziska Y, Levine SR.Isolated third cranial nerve palsy in pituitary apoplexy: case report and systematic review. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021:30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105969.
11. Campero A, Martins C, Yasuda A, Rhoton AL Jr. Microsurgical anatomy of the diaphragma sellae and its role in directing the pattern of growth of pituitary adenomas. Neurosurgery. 2008;62 https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000317321.79106.37.
12. Campero A, Campero AA, Martins C, Yasuda A, Rhoton AL Jr. Surgical anatomy of the dural walls of the cavernous sinus. J Clin Neurosci. 2010;17 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jocn.2009.10.015.
13. Yasuda A, Campero A, Martins C, Rhoton AL Jr, Ribas GC.The medial wall of the cavernous sinus: microsurgical anatomy. Neurosurgery. 2004;55:179.
14. Martins C, Yasuda A, Campero A, Rhoton AL Jr. Microsurgical anatomy of the oculomotor cistern. Neurosurgery. 2006;58 https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000204673.55834.BE.
15. Martins C, Yasuda A, Campero A, Ulm AJ, Tanriover N, Rhoton A.Microsurgical anatomy of the dural arteries. Neurosurgery. 2005;56 https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000144823.94402.3D.
16. Zaidi HA, Cote DJ, Castlen JP, Burke WT, Liu YH, Smith TR, etal. Time course of reso­lution of hyperprolactinemia after Transsphenoidal surgery among patients presenting with pituitary stalk compression. World Neurosurg. 2017;97:2–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
wneu.2016.09.066.
17. Mlawa G, Rehman F.Pituitary tumours and bradycardia/complete heart block-an association or incidental ndings? Endocr Abstr. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1530/endoabs.50.p301.
18. Masago A, Ueda Y, Umemura S.Pituitary apoplexy after pituitary function test: a report oftwo cases and review of literature. Surg Neurol. 1995:158–65.
19. Tu M, Lu Q, Zhu P, Zheng W. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for pituitary apo­plexy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci. 2016;370:258–62. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jns.2016.09.047.
20. Sahyouni R, Goshtasbi K, Choi E, Mahboubi H, Le R, Khahera AS, etal. Vision outcomes in early versus late surgical intervention of pituitary apoplexy: meta- analysis. World Neurosurg. 2019;127:52–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.133.
21. Lubbe DE, Mankahla N, Carrara H, Semple P.Surgical intervention for binocular blindness in pituitary apoplexy. Interdiscip Neurosurg. 2019:18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inat.2019.100490.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0303- 8467(97)82413- 4.
289
Part V
Headache Attributed to Non-vascular
Intracranial Disorder
Chapter 31
Headache Attributed toLow Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Pressure
MarcioNattanPortesSouza andDiogoGuilhermeLeãoEdelmuth

31.1 Introduction

Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) is an underdiagnosed secondary head­ache condition caused by spontaneous cerebrospinal uid (CSF) leakage, resulting in a spectrum of diverse symptoms and radiological ndings. The most common clinical manifestation is orthostatic headache, and the rst step of investigation is the brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Advances in imaging and understand­ing of the underlying mechanisms, including cerebrospinal uid (CSF)–venous s­tulas (CVF), have improved diagnostic accuracy; however, management remains challenging, particularly in patients with complex presentations or comorbidities. This chapter explores the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic approaches, and treatment strategies for SIH, grounded in a real-world case that highlights the importance of specialized care, multidisciplinary evaluation, and tar­geted imaging techniques. Through this lens, we aim to provide clinicians with practical insights and an evidence-based framework to recognize and manage this condition effectively across a range of clinical settings.

31.2 Pathophysiology

Currently, three different etiologies of SIH are recognized: (1) CSF leak due to a nerve root sleeve diverticulum, (2) CSF leak due to an osteophyte spur, and (3) CSF–venous stula (CVF)(1). In all types, there is a CSF leak from the subarach­noid space to either the epidural space or the intravenous compartment. Despite the CSF volume loss, intracranial pressure measured by lumbar puncture is usually
M. N. P. Souza (*) · D. G. L. Edelmuth Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Hospital das Clinicas FMUSP, São Paulo, Brazil
Switzerland AG 2026 D. Uludüz et al. (eds.), Rare Causes of Headache Disorders, Headache,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-10242-3_31
293© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
294
M. N. P. Souza and D. G. L. Edelmuth
normal, due to compensatory mechanisms including an increase in intracranial venous volume, which can be identied in some cases by prominent intracranial venous engorgement [13]. One important concept is that skull-base CSF leaks typically do not present with the typical symptoms of SIH or neuroimaging signs. Therefore, in cases of SIH presentation, the target of investigation and treatment should be at the spinal levels [4].

31.3 Case Presentation

A 72-year-old man with a history of chronic kidney disease following unilateral nephrectomy, splenomegaly, and prior malignancies (including bladder, renal, intestinal, and prostate cancer) presented with a sudden onset of daily headache, predominantly orthostatic, worsening in the upright position and alleviating with recumbency. He had no previous history of headaches. Brain MRI at the time revealed bilateral subdural hematomas and diffuse pachymeningeal thickening, ndings suggestive of spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) (Fig.31.1).
Spine MRI did not present any longitudinal epidural collection (Fig.31.2).
After the rst week, there was spontaneous improvement in symptoms. A few days later, following a minor motor vehicle accident, the patient experienced clini­cal deterioration characterized by exacerbation of headaches, postural instability, gait disturbances, and altered level of consciousness. Brain computed tomography (CT) showed enlargement of the subdural hematomas, requiring urgent neurosurgi­cal drainage (Fig.31.3).
Fig. 31.1 Axial uid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) image shows diffuse pachymenin­geal thickening and bilateral subdural effusions/hematomas
31 Headache Attributed toLow Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Pressure
Fig. 31.2 Spine MRI sagittal T1 showing absence of longitudinal epidural collection
295
Fig. 31.3 Brain CT showing left hematoma with shift of the midline suggestive of hypertensive hematoma
296
Fig. 31.4 Axial FLAIR showing bilateral subdural hematoma
M. N. P. Souza and D. G. L. Edelmuth
The postoperative course was complicated by delayed surgical site infection and subsequent bacterial meningitis, necessitating further surgical interventions, includ­ing craniectomy and drainage repositioning. Although the headaches initially improved after these procedures, the patient reported persistent asthenia and dis­crete proximal weakness in the upper limbs, and brain MRI continued to show nd­ings suggestive of SIH (Fig.31.4).
An epidural blood patch (EBP) was considered at that time. Still, due to the comorbidities and the absence of an epidural collection at the rst spine image, a second opinion was sought in a specialized center. Considering the typical presenta­tion at the beginning of the evolution, the typical ndings of the rst Brain MRI, the absence of an identiable epidural CSF collection and the persistence of signs of SIH in the last Brain MRI after surgery, the possibility of a CSF–venous stula was considered.
A rst computed tomography (CT) myelography was performed with contrast injection in the right lateral decubitus position and did not reveal any denite cere­brospinal uid–venous stula (Fig.31.5). However, subtle linear contrast enhance­ment was observed near the left T10–T11 neural foramen (at the emergence of the left T10 nerve root), with delayed washout, possibly representing veins of the inter­vertebral venous plexus.
After two days, a second CT myelography was performed in the left lateral decu­bitus position, and it revealed a CSF–venous stula at the level of T10–T11 (Fig.31.6).