Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5526_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
29 Мб
Скачать
24 Headache Attributed toCerebral Venous Thrombosis (CVT)
233
24.5 Pain Pathways Involved inCVT-Related Headaches
The pain mechanisms underlying CVT-related headaches are multifaceted, involv­ing both peripheral and central sensitization. The activation of the trigeminovascu­lar system, combined with secondary inammatory and vascular changes, leads to increased excitability of central pain-processing networks in the brainstem and thalamus. This central sensitization contributes to headache chronicity and may explain why some CVT patients develop prolonged post-thrombotic headaches even after recanalization [16].
Given the complex interplay of venous congestion, neuroinammation, cerebral edema, and hemorrhagic transformation, CVT-related headaches require a tailored treatment approach [17]. Management strategies should focus on anticoagulation to prevent thrombosis progression, symptomatic relief with analgesics, and measures to reduce ICP, such as acetazolamide or therapeutic lumbar punctures (LPs) in select cases. Early recognition and intervention are crucial to mitigate long-term neurological complications and improve patient outcomes.

24.6 Clinical Characteristics

Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a complex condition that often presents with headache as a primary symptom, occurring in up to 90% of cases [1]. The headache associated with CVT can exhibit diverse characteristics, making its diagnosis chal­lenging [18]. CVT-related headaches typically have a subacute or progressive onset, though some cases may present with a thunderclap headache pattern, which is sud­den and severe, reaching its peak within minutes [1, 19, 20]. Thunderclap headaches in CVT can be particularly concerning, as they may mimic subarachnoid hemor­rhage [7, 21]. The headache can be diffuse or localized, sometimes described as throbbing or band-like [19, 22]. Diffuse headaches are common, affecting the whole head, while localized headaches may involve specic regions such as the frontal, temporal, or occipital areas [21]. CVT-related headaches are often accompanied by nausea, photophobia, and focal neurological signs such as seizures, motor weak­ness, or visual disturbances [1]. These symptoms can vary widely among patients and may not always be present.
Comparison with Other Secondary Headaches CVT-related headaches can be confused with other secondary headache disorders due to overlapping symptoms. For example, idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) also presents with headache and increased intracranial pressure, but typically includes visual disturbances like papilledema [6]. Meningitis may also cause headache, but is usually accompanied by fever and neck stiffness [23]. Stroke can present with a sudden-onset headache, but is typically associated with focal neurological decits [23].
234
D. Uluduz and A. Özge
Red ags for CVT include the sudden onset of severe headache, seizures, or focal neurological decits such as weakness or visual disturbances [1, 2, 24]. These symptoms necessitate prompt imaging and diagnosis to prevent complications and improve outcomes.
24.7 Diagnosis ofCVT-Related Headache
Diagnosing cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT)-related headaches involves a combi­nation of clinical suspicion and differential diagnosis, as the symptoms can mimic other conditions such as idiopathic intracranial hypertension or subarachnoid hem­orrhage [25, 26]. The headache associated with CVT often presents with nonspe­cic features, making it crucial to consider CVT in the differential diagnosis of patients with headache, especially when accompanied by signs of increased intra­cranial pressure or focal neurological decits [25].
Clinical Presentation and Pathophysiology The headache associated with CVT is highly variable and can range from a diffuse, pressure-like pain to a thunderclap headache suggestive of subarachnoid hemorrhage. The underlying mechanism is related to impaired venous drainage, leading to increased intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral congestion, and potential venous infarction [26]. The increased ICP results from obstructed cerebrospinal uid (CSF) absorption at the arachnoid granu­lations due to venous hypertension, contributing to persistent headaches, often exac­erbated by Valsalva maneuvers, coughing or postural changes.
Focal neurological decits such as hemiparesis, aphasia, or seizures may arise from localized venous infarcts due to thrombosis-induced ischemia. The presence of papilledema on fundoscopic examination can further support the diagnosis of raised ICP secondary to CVT.In some cases, patients may also present with altered mental status or encephalopathy, particularly if there is signicant cerebral edema or hemorrhagic transformation [25].
Neuroimaging Approaches
Neuroimaging plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis of
CVT.The gold standard imaging modality is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with magnetic resonance venography (MRV), which provides high sensi­tivity and specicity in detecting thrombosed cerebral veins or dural sinuses [1]. MRI sequences such as susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) and T2* gradient echo can help visualize the thrombus by detecting deoxygenated blood products. In contrast, contrast-enhanced MRV can delineate the extent of venous obstruction. Computed tomography (CT) and CT venography (CTV) can serve as alternatives, particularly in emergency settings where MRI may not be immediately available. A hyperdense appearance of the thrombosed sinus on non-contrast CT (commonly observed in the superior sagittal sinus) or the “empty delta sign” on contrast­enhanced CT suggests CVT [26]. However, CT imaging alone may miss early or partial thrombosis, necessitating further conrmation with MRV. In ambiguous
24 Headache Attributed toCerebral Venous Thrombosis (CVT)
235
cases, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) may be considered as a conrmatory tool to visualize venous outow patterns and detect subtle occlusions not delineated by MRV or CTV [27].
Lumbar Puncture and CSF Analysis in CVT While lumbar puncture (LP) is not a primary diagnostic tool for CVT, it can provide supportive evidence by revealing elevated opening pressure, which indicates increased ICP [25]. Elevated protein levels and mild pleocytosis in the CSF may suggest secondary inammatory or ischemic processes. However, normal CSF ndings do not exclude CVT, and LP should be performed cautiously in the presence of signicant intracranial hyperten­sion to prevent brain herniation.
Biomarkers and Laboratory Tests for Prothrombotic States Since CVT often occurs in the setting of an underlying hypercoagulable state, laboratory investiga­tions are essential to identify potential risk factors. Prothrombotic screening should include testing for inherited and acquired thrombophilic disorders such as: Factor V Leiden mutation (leading to activated protein C resistance), prothrombin gene mutation (G20210A), antithrombin III, protein C, and protein S deciencies (impairing anticoagulant pathways), antiphospholipid syndrome (testing for lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, and β2-glycoprotein-I antibodies), elevated homo­cysteine levels, which can predispose to endothelial dysfunction and thrombosis [26]. Additional inammatory markers, such as D-dimer, can assist in early screen­ing, as elevated levels indicate ongoing brinolysis in the presence of a thrombus. However, D-dimer levels may be normal in isolated cortical vein thrombosis or subacute CVT, necessitating further imaging conrmation [26].

24.8 Treatment Approaches

The cornerstone of CVT treatment is anticoagulation therapy, which aims to prevent clot propagation, facilitate recanalization, and reduce venous congestion. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is used in the acute phase, particularly in critically ill patients, as it offers the advantage of rapid reversal in cases of hemorrhagic compli­cations. UFH is administered intravenously and requires dose adjustments based on activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) values [27, 28]. Low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is preferred over UFH due to its more predictable pharmacokinet­ics, lower risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and reduced need for monitor­ing. LMWH has been shown to have better efcacy and safety compared to UFH in CVT treatment [9]. Warfarin is initiated after the acute phase, usually as a bridging therapy following heparin, targeting an international normalized ratio (INR) of 2–3. Warfarin has traditionally been used for long-term anticoagulation in CVT [9]. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly considered as alternatives to warfarin due to their ease of use, xed dosing, and lower bleeding risk. Recent stud­ies suggest comparable efcacy of DOACs in CVT treatment, but more extensive
236
D. Uluduz and A. Özge
trials are needed for denitive guidelines [29]. Notably, anticoagulation is recom­mended even in the presence of intracranial hemorrhage, as CVT-induced bleeding often results from venous congestion rather than primary vessel rupture. The ratio­nale for continued anticoagulation is to reduce venous hypertension, thereby pre­venting further hemorrhage and facilitating clot resolution.
In cases where anticoagulation therapy fails or neurological deterioration pro­gresses despite optimal medical management, endovascular treatment may be con­sidered. These interventions include mechanical thrombectomy, like catheter-based techniques that physically remove thrombi from the occluded venous sinuses, restoring venous drainage and reducing ICP [30]. Catheter-directed thrombolysis involves direct administration of thrombolytic agents (e.g., recombinant tissue plas­minogen activator, rtPA) into the thrombus to accelerate clot dissolution [31]. Angioplasty with stenting is rarely performed, but is considered in cases with per­sistent venous sinus stenosis contributing to ongoing venous hypertension [26, 32,
33]. Endovascular interventions remain reserved for severe cases where conven-
tional anticoagulation fails, particularly in the setting of extensive cerebral edema or coma. In severe cases with signicant neurological deterioration, endovascular interventions such as mechanical thrombectomy or thrombolysis may be considered to restore venous outow and alleviate intracranial hypertension [26, 32].
Management of Increased Intracranial Pressure (ICP) Elevated ICP is a major contributor to CVT-related headaches and may lead to secondary neurological deterioration if not effectively controlled. Acetazolamide, a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, reduces cerebrospinal uid (CSF) production, thereby lowering ICP.It is commonly used in patients with signs of intracranial hypertension, such as papill­edema. Acetazolamide has been shown to have an acceptable safety prole at dos­ages up to 4 g/d in treating idiopathic intracranial hypertension, though it is associated with side effects like paresthesia and dysgeusia [34, 35]. Agents such as mannitol and hypertonic saline can be administered to reduce cerebral edema in acute settings. Both agents are effective in reducing ICP, but hypertonic saline may offer a greater and longer-lasting effect compared to mannitol. Corticosteroids are not routinely recommended unless there is an associated inammatory component, such as vasculitis or autoimmune thrombosis. Corticosteroids have shown minimal benet in reducing ICP in conditions like traumatic brain injury and ischemic stroke. Still, they may be benecial in bacterial meningitis by reducing complications like sensorineural hearing loss [36]. In cases of refractory increased ICP with impending brain herniation, decompressive craniectomy or ventriculostomy may be required to relieve pressure and prevent fatal outcomes. Decompressive craniectomy has been shown to improve survival and functional outcomes in patients with malignant cere­bral infarctions by effectively controlling ICP [37].
Analgesics and anti-inammatory drugs are used for the symptomatic relief of headaches. However, prolonged use of nonsteroidal anti-inammatory drugs (NSAIDs) should be avoided due to bleeding risks when combined with anticoagu­lation [1013]. The use of corticosteroids is controversial and generally not recom­mended unless there are specic indications, such as signicant inammation. In
24 Headache Attributed toCerebral Venous Thrombosis (CVT)
some cases, CVT-related headaches may mimic migraines, and similar treatment strategies may be employed.
Some patients may experience persistent or recurrent headaches post-CVT, which can evolve into chronic daily headache or post-thrombotic headache syn­dromes [13]. The risk of developing chronic headache conditions is a concern, necessitating long-term follow-up and management [13]. CVT can lead to cognitive impairments and neuropsychological issues, which require rehabilitation efforts to improve quality of life [8]. Patients should be advised on lifestyle modications to prevent future episodes, including management of prothrombotic conditions and avoiding triggers for headache exacerbation.
237
24.9 Future Directions andResearch Gaps
Despite signicant advances in the understanding and management of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVT) and its associated headaches, several gaps remain that warrant further research and clinical innovation. The identication of reliable biomarkers could facilitate earlier diagnosis of CVT, reducing delays in treatment initiation. Research into inammatory markers, coagulation proles, and endothe­lial dysfunction could provide valuable insights into CVT pathophysiology and aid in risk stratication. CVT-related headaches exhibit substantial heterogeneity, rang­ing from migraine-like to tension-type or thunderclap headaches. Tailoring treat­ment strategies based on individual headache phenotypes could enhance symptom control and improve patient quality of life. While acute treatment is well- established, there is a need for structured long-term follow-up protocols to monitor recurrence risk, persistent headaches, and cognitive or psychological sequelae in CVT survi­vors. Future studies should explore optimal surveillance intervals and preventive strategies.

24.10 Conclusion

Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis remains a complex and potentially life- threatening condition, often presenting with persistent and debilitating headaches. Early recog­nition and accurate diagnosis are crucial to initiating timely anticoagulation therapy and managing intracranial hypertension effectively.
This review highlights the importance of neuroimaging as the cornerstone of CVT diagnosis, the role of anticoagulation in preventing disease progression, and the need for personalized approaches in headache management. The long-term bur­den of CVT-related headaches underscores the necessity for continued research into biomarkers, neuroimaging techniques, and individualized treatment protocols. Given the multifaceted nature of CVT, an interdisciplinary approach involving neu­rologists, hematologists, radiologists, and other specialists is essential to optimize
238
D. Uluduz and A. Özge
patient outcomes. Future studies should focus on rening diagnostic tools, improv­ing therapeutic strategies, and developing comprehensive long-term care models to enhance the quality of life for CVT survivors.

References

1. Duman T, Uluduz D, Midi I, Bektas H, Kablan Y, Goksel BK, Milanlioglu A, Necioglu Orken D, Aluclu U, VENOST Study Group. A multicenter study of 1144 patients with cerebral venous thrombosis: the VENOST study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;26(8):1848–57. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.04.020.
2. García-Azorín D, Monje MHG, González-García N, Guerrero ÁL, Porta-Etessam J.Presence of red ags in patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis admitted to the emergency department because of headache: a STROBE compliant cohort-study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(29):e20900. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020900.
3. Riva N, Squizzato A.Stroke: patients with CVT urgently need high-quality evidence. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13(11):644–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2017.143.
4. Duman T, Çınar N, Uludüz D, Domaç FM, Öztürk S, Yayla V, Karahan AY, Afşar N, Sungur MA, Göksu EÖ, Yürekli VA, Genç H, Utku U, Şahin Ş, Tekeli H, Tokuç FE, Uzuner N, Şenol MG, Yılmaz A, Gökçe M, Demirci S, Küsbeci ÖY, Uzuner GT, Batur Çağlayan HZ, Açıkgöz M, Kurucu H, Özdağ MF, Baybaş S, Ekmekçi H, Çabalar M, Yaman M, Bektaş H, Kaplan Y, Göksel BK, Milanlioğlu A, Örken DN, Aluclu MU, Çolakoğlu S, Tüfekçi A, Bakar M, Nazliel B, Tasçılar N, Göksan B, Kozak HH, Mısırlı CH, Küçükoğlu H, Midi İ, Mengüllüoğlu N, Aytaç E, Yeşilot N, İnce B, Yalın OÖ, Güneş T, Oruç S, Demir S.Headache as the sole pre­senting symptom of cerebral venous sinuses thrombosis: Subgroup analysis of data from the VENOST study. Agri. 2021;33(1):7–14. English. https://doi.org/10.14744/Agri.2020.77698.
5. Timóteo Â, Inácio N, Machado S, Pinto AA, Parreira E.Headache as the sole presentation of cerebral venous thrombosis: a prospective study. J Headache Pain. 2012;13(6):487–90. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s10194- 012- 0456- 3.
6. Cumurciuc R, Crassard I, Sarov M, Valade D, Bousser MG.Headache as the only neurologi­cal sign of cerebral venous thrombosis: a series of 17 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76(8):1084–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2004.056275.
7. Sparaco M, Feleppa M, Bigal ME.Cerebral venous thrombosis and headache–a case-series. Headache. 2015;55(6):806–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.12599.
8. Mehta A, Danesh J, Kuruvilla D.Cerebral venous thrombosis headache. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019;23(7):47.
9. ICHD-3. Headache attributed to cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). In: International classi­cation of headache disorders. 3rd ed. 2018.
10. Piazza G. Cerebral venous thrombosis. Circulation. 2012;125(13):1704–9. https://doi.
org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.067835.
11. Olaru C, Langberg S, McCoin NS.A review of the clinical presentation, causes, and diagnostic evaluation of increased intracranial pressure in the emergency department. West J Emerg Med. 2024;25(6):1003–10. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18500.
12. Saposnik G, Barinagarrementeria F, Brown RD Jr, Bushnell CD, Cucchiara B, Cushman M, deVeber G, Ferro JM, Tsai FY, American Heart Association stroke council and the council on epidemiology and prevention. Diagnosis and management of cerebral venous thrombosis: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2011;42(4):1158–92. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0b013e31820a8364.
13. Russo AF.Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP): a new target for migraine. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015;55:533–52.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916- 019- 0786- 9.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev- pharmtox- 010814- 124701.
24 Headache Attributed toCerebral Venous Thrombosis (CVT)
14. Hu S, Lee H, Zhao H, Ding Y, Duan J.Inammation and severe cerebral venous thrombosis. Front Neurol. 2022;13:873802. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.873802.
15. Li AY, Tong E, Yedavalli VS.A case-based review of cerebral venous infarcts with perfusion imaging and comparison to arterial ischemic stroke. Front Radiol. 2021;1:687045. https://doi.
org/10.3389/fradi.2021.687045.
16. Bernstein C, Burstein R. Sensitization of the Trigeminovascular pathway: perspective and implications to migraine pathophysiology. J Clin Neurol. 2012;8(2):89–99. https://doi.
org/10.3988/jcn.2012.8.2.89.
17. Idiculla PS, Gurala D, Palanisamy M, Vijayakumar R, Dhandapani S, Nagarajan E.Cerebral venous thrombosis: a comprehensive review. Eur Neurol. 2020;83(4):369–79. https://doi.
org/10.1159/000509802.
18. Nascimento FA, Sória MG, Rizelio V, Kowacs PA.Cerebral venous thrombosis with migraine­like headache and the Trigeminovascular system. Case Rep Neurol Med. 2016;2016:2059749.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2059749.
19. Botta R, Donirpathi S, Yadav R, Kulkarni GB, Kumar MV, Nagaraja D.Headache patterns in cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2017;8(Suppl 1):S72–7. https://doi.
org/10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_339_16.
20. Duman T, Uluduz D, Midi I, Bektas H, Kablan Y, Goksel BK, Milanlioglu A, Necioglu Orken D, Aluclu U (No specic date provided). Headache as the sole presenting symptom of cerebral venous sinuses thrombosis: Subgroup analysis of data from the VENOST study.
21. Wasay M, Kojan S, Dai AI, Bobustuc G, Sheikh Z.Headache in cerebral venous thrombosis: incidence, pattern and location in 200 consecutive patients. J Headache Pain. 2010;11(2):137–9.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10194- 010- 0186- 3. Epub 2010 Jan 29. PMID: 20112042; PMCID:
PMC3452295.
22. Singh RJ, Saini J, Varadharajan S, Kulkarni GB, Veerendrakumar M. Headache in cerebral venous sinus thrombosis revisited: exploring the role of vascular congestion and cortical vein thrombosis. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(3):503–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102417698707.
23. Bousser MG, Ferro JM. Cerebral venous thrombosis: an update. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(2):162–70.
24. Timóteo Â, Inácio N, Machado S, Pinto AA, Parreira E.Headache as the sole presentation of cerebral venous thrombosis: a prospective study. J Headache Pain. 2012;13:487.
25. Ferro JM, Aguiar de Sousa D.Cerebral venous thrombosis: an update. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2019;19(10):74.
26. Ferro JM, Bousser MG, Canhão P, Coutinho JM, Crassard I, Dentali F, di Minno M, Maino A, Martinelli I, Masuhr F, Aguiar de Sousa D, Stam J, European Stroke Organization. European stroke organization guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis– endorsed by the European academy of neurology. Eur J Neurol. 2017;24(10):1203–13. https://
doi.org/10.1111/ene.13381.
27. Ranjan R, Ken-Dror G, Sharma P. Pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of cerebral venous thrombosis: a comprehensive review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102(48):e36366.
https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000036366.
28. Coutinho JM, Ferro JM, Canhão P, Barinagarrementeria F, Bousser MG, Stam J, ISCVT Investigators. Unfractionated or low-molecular weight heparin for the treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis. Stroke. 2010;41(11):2575–80. https://doi.org/10.1161/
STROKEAHA.110.588822.
29. Weimar C, Beyer-Westendorf J, Bohmann FO, Hahn G, Halimeh S, Holzhauer S, Kalka C, Knoach M, Koennecke HC, Masuhr F, Mono ML, Nowak-Göttl U, Scherret E, Schlamann M, Linnemann B.New recommendations on cerebral venous and dural sinus thrombosis from the German consensus-based (S2k) guideline. Neurol Res Pract. 2024;6(1):23. https://doi.
org/10.1186/s42466- 024- 00320- 9.
30. Siddiqui FM, Dandapat S, Banerjee C, Zuurbier SM, Johnson M, Stam J, Coutinho JM.Mechanical thrombectomy in cerebral venous thrombosis: systematic review of 185 cases. Stroke. 2015;46(5):1263–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007465.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474- 4422(07)70029- 7.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910- 019- 0988- x.
239
240
31. Sundar K, Paulraj S, Choudhury SR, Hassan H, Sengupta J, Pattari SK.Successful endo­vascular treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis with a novel, larger aspiration catheter (REACT): a case report. Neurointervention. 2021;16(1):83–7. https://doi.org/10.5469/neu
roint.2020.00304. Epub 2020 Dec 28. Erratum in: Neurointervention. 2021 Jul;16(2):200.
https://doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2020.00304.e1.
32. Zhongrong M, Feng L, Shengmao L, Fengshui Z.Venous sinus stent-assisted angioplasty for refractory benign intracranial hypertension. Interv Neuroradiol. 2003;9(1):79–82. https://doi.
org/10.1177/159101990300900114. Epub 2004 Oct 22
33. ten Hove MW, Friedman DI, Patel AD, Irrcher I, Wall M, McDermott MP.NORDIC idiopathic intracranial hypertension study group. Safety and tolerability of acetazolamide in the idio­pathic intracranial hypertension treatment trial. J Neuroophthalmol. 2016;36(1):13–9. https://
doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000000322.
34. NORDIC Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Study Group Writing Committee, Wall M, McDermott MP, Kieburtz KD, Corbett JJ, Feldon SE, Friedman DI, Katz DM, Keltner JL, Schron EB, Kupersmith MJ.Effect of acetazolamide on visual function in patients with idio­pathic intracranial hypertension and mild visual loss: the idiopathic intracranial hypertension treatment trial. JAMA. 2014;311(16):1641–51. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.3312.
35. Kareemi H, Pratte M, English S, Hendin A.Initial diagnosis and management of acutely elevated intracranial pressure. J Intensive Care Med. 2023;38(7):643–50. https://doi.
org/10.1177/08850666231156589.
36. Lim JX, Liu SJ, Cheong TM, Saffari SE, Han JX, Chen MW.Intracranial pressure as an objec­tive biomarker of decompression adequacy in large territory infarction: a multicenter observa­tional study. Front Surg. 2022;9:823899. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.823899.
37. Gadgil N, Aldave G, Whitehead WE, Dmytriw AA, Chen K, Orbach D, Maier I, Behme D, Fargen KM, Elijovich L, Dornbos D 3rd, Spiotta A, Kan P.Endovascular intervention for refractory pediatric cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Pediatr Neurol. 2021;121:45–50.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2021.05.004.
D. Uluduz and A. Özge
-
Chapter 25
Headache Attributed toReversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome
MarceloValença andLucianaPatríziaAlvesde Andrade-Valença

25.1 Introduction

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is a condition characterized by recurrent episodes of thunderclap headache associated with reversible multifocal vasoconstriction of cerebral arteries [13]. The syndrome can occur spontaneously or be triggered by various factors, including sexual activity, antidepressants such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [4, 5], immunosuppressant pharmacotherapy [68], vasoactive drugs [9], cocaine abuse [10], bromuscular dysplasia [11], snakebite victims [12], Guillain–Barré syndrome [13], coronavirus 2 vaccination [14], intracranial hypotension [15], among other causes [16]. The female sex appears to be more susceptible to RCVS [17]. Cases of RCVS have been diagnosed as a rare and understudied transfusion reaction, most commonly observed in adult females after the correction of chronic, severe anemia [18, 19]. While initially underrecognized, RCVS has gained increasing attention due to its potential to cause severe neurological complications.
The rst time we encountered a patient with RCVS was in 1999. She was a woman who experienced two episodes of explosive thunderclap headache occurring during separate orgasms, one during sexual intercourse and another during mastur­bation. Her case was published in 2004 alongside a literature review of similar cases associated with sexual activity [20]. In our article, we mentioned that we found several cases in the literature of thunderclap headache with concurrent intracranial arterial vasoconstriction unrelated to eclampsia, suggesting a distinct clinical entity. We rst introduced this concept at the Brazilian Headache Congress in 2002 [21], where we proposed it as a new headache syndrome, initially named “Abrupt Severe Headache Associated with Segmental Artery Narrowing (ASHCAN).” At that time, we drafted an article outlining diagnostic criteria, clinical features, and prognostic
M. Valença (*) · L. P. A. de Andrade-Valença Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
Switzerland AG 2026 D. Uludüz et al. (eds.), Rare Causes of Headache Disorders, Headache,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-10242-3_25
241© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
242
M. Valença and L. P. A. de Andrade-Valença
factors. However, the article was not accepted for publication, with no justication provided. Years later, we eventually published our ndings, contributing to the growing recognition of RCVS as a distinct neurological disorder [16].

25.2 Case Presentation

A 42-year-old woman with a history of chronic migraine-like headache and overuse of analgesics, particularly Neosaldina® (a combination of isometheptene, dipyrone sodium, and caffeine), was scheduled for elective gallbladder surgery. One week before the procedure, she took Allegra D (fexofenadine) for 7days to manage her allergy symptoms.
During the surgery, she developed anaphylactic shock, requiring resuscitation. Following this event, she became torpid and exhibited right-sided hemiparesis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with angiography revealed multiple ischemic lesions affecting different arterial territories (Fig.25.1), and MR angiography showed diffuse arterial narrowing in several cerebral arteries (Fig.25.2), consistent with RCVS.
The patient deteriorated further, developing intracranial hypertension, primarily due to cerebellar edema with brainstem compression. MRI scans revealed the absence of subarachnoid cisterns, indicating a signicant mass effect in the poste­rior fossa (Fig.25.1b, c). An emergency posterior fossa decompressive craniectomy with duroplasty was performed to relieve pressure (Fig.25.3).
Over the next 2months, the patient showed gradual improvement in consciousness, initially presenting with akinetic mutism, where she failed to open her eyes but occa­sionally obeyed simple verbal commands. At 6months, she regained the ability to walk and communicate verbally, though she remained somewhat apathetic with mild right-arm motor weakness. She was even able to drive under her husband’s supervision.
abc
Fig. 25.1 Axial brain MRI showing ischemic areas in the left posterior cerebral artery territory, including the left thalamus (a), and a large cerebellar ischemic area involving both hemispheres with signicant brainstem compression (b and c). Note the near-complete disappearance of the posterior fossa cisterns, suggesting severe compartmental hypertension