Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5526_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Foreword
- •Contents
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Pathophysiology
- •1.3 Case Presentation
- •1.4 Case Discussion
- •1.5 Clinical Characteristics
- •1.6 Diagnostic Algorithm
- •1.8 Management
- •1.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Pathophysiology
- •2.3 Case Presentation
- •2.4 Case Discussion
- •2.5 Clinical Characteristics
- •1.7 Differential Diagnosis
- •2.6 Diagnostic Algorithm
- •2.7 Management
- •2.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Pathophysiology
- •3.3 Case Presentation
- •3.4 Case Discussion
- •3.5 Clinical Characteristics
- •3.6 Diagnostic Algorithm
- •3.7 Management
- •3.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Pathophysiology
- •4.3 Case Presentation
- •4.4 Case Discussion
- •4.6 Diagnostic Algorithm
- •4.7 Management
- •4.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Pathophysiology
- •5.3 Case Presentation
- •5.4 Case Discussion
- •5.5 Diagnostic Algorithm
- •5.6 Management
- •5.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Pathogenesis
- •6.3 Case Presentation
- •6.4 Case Discussion
- •6.5 Diagnostic Algorithm
- •6.6 Management
- •6.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Pathophysiology
- •7.3 Case Presentation
- •7.5 Differential Diagnosis
- •7.7 The Following Strategies Are Essential
- •7.7.1 Acute Symptom Relief
- •7.7.1.1 Pharmacological Treatment
- •7.7.2.1 Pharmacologic Prophylaxis
- •7.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.3 Case Study
- •8.4 Case Discussion
- •8.5 Clinical Management
- •8.7 Diagnosis
- •8.8 Treatment
- •8.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Case Presentation
- •9.4 Diagnosis Algorithm
- •9.5 Secondary SUNCT
- •9.6 Management
- •9.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 Pathophysiology
- •10.3 Case Presentation
- •10.4 Case Discussion
- •10.5 Clinical Characteristics
- •10.6 Diagnostic Algorithm
- •10.7 Management
- •10.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Pathophysiology
- •11.3 Case Presentation
- •11.4 Case Discussion
- •11.5 Clinical Characteristics
- •11.6 Diagnostic Algorithm
- •11.6.1 Step 1: Detailed Patient History
- •11.8 Management
- •11.9 Conclusions
- •12.2 Pathophysiology
- •12.3 Case Presentation
- •12.4 Case Discussion
- •12.6 Treatment
- •12.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 Pathophysiology
- •13.3 Case Presentation
- •13.4 Case Discussion
- •13.5 Clinical Characteristics
- •13.6 Diagnostic Algorithm
- •13.7 Management
- •13.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Pathophysiology
- •14.3 Case Presentation
- •14.3.1 Clinical Case 1
- •14.3.2 Clinical Case 2
- •14.4 Case Discussion
- •14.5 Clinical Characteristics
- •14.7 Treatment/Management
- •14.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.2 Case Presentation
- •15.3 Case Discussion
- •15.4 Diagnostic Algorithm
- •15.5 Pathophysiology
- •15.6 Clinical Presentation
- •15.6.1 External-Compression Headache (ECH)
- •15.6.2 External-Traction Headache (ETH)
- •15.7 Management
- •15.7.1 Nonpharmacological Strategies
- •15.7.2 Pharmacological Strategies
- •15.7.3 Patient Education and Awareness
- •15.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Pathophysiology
- •16.3 Case Presentation
- •16.4 Case Discussion
- •16.6 Diagnostic Algorithm
- •16.7 Management
- •16.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 Pathophysiology
- •17.3 Case Presentation
- •17.4 Case Discussion
- •17.5 Clinical Characteristics
- •17.6 Diagnosis
- •17.7 Differential Diagnosis
- •17.8 Treatment
- •17.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •18.1 Introduction
- •18.2 Pathophysiology
- •18.3 Case Presentation
- •18.4 Case Discussion
- •18.5 Clinical Presentation
- •18.6 Diagnosis
- •18.7 Differential Diagnosis
- •18.8 Treatment
- •18.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.2 Pathophysiology
- •19.3 Case Presentation
- •19.4 Case Discussion
- •19.5 Diagnostic Approach
- •19.6 Management
- •19.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •20.1 Introduction
- •20.3 Case Report
- •20.4 Case Discussion
- •20.6 Clinical Presentation
- •20.7 Diagnostic Algorithm
- •20.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •21.1 Introduction
- •21.2 Case Presentation
- •21.3 Clinical Characteristics
- •21.4 Diagnosis
- •21.5 Treatment
- •References
- •22.1 Introduction
- •22.3 Case Presentation 1
- •22.4 Case Discussion
- •22.5 Case Presentation 2
- •22.6 Case Discussion 2
- •22.7 Clinical Characteristics
- •22.8 Diagnostic Workup
- •22.9 Treatment
- •22.10 Prognosis
- •References
- •23.1 Introduction
- •23.2 Pathophysiology
- •23.3 Case Presentation
- •23.4 Case Discussion
- •23.6 Diagnostic Algorithm
- •23.7 Management
- •23.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •24.1 Introduction
- •24.2 Case Presentation
- •24.3 Case Discussion
- •24.4 Pathophysiology
- •24.6 Clinical Characteristics
- •24.8 Treatment Approaches
- •24.10 Conclusion
- •References
- •25.1 Introduction
- •25.2 Case Presentation
- •25.3 Case Discussion
- •25.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •26.1 Introduction
- •26.2 Pathophysiology
- •26.3 Case Presentation
- •26.4 Case Discussion
- •26.5 Clinical Characteristics
- •26.6 Diagnostic Algorithm
- •26.7 Management
- •26.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •27.1 Introduction
- •27.2 Case Presentations
- •27.3 Clinical Characteristics
- •27.4 Discussion
- •27.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •28.1 Introduction
- •28.2 Case Presentation
- •28.3 Case Discussion
- •28.4 Clinical Characteristics
- •28.5 Diagnosis
- •28.6 Conclusion
- •28.7 Key Messages
- •References
- •29.1 Introduction
- •29.2 Pathophysiology
- •29.3 Case Presentation
- •29.4 Clinical Presentation
- •29.5 Diagnosis
- •29.6 Treatment
- •29.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •30.1 Introduction
- •30.2 Clinical Case
- •30.3 Clinical Presentation
- •30.4 Differential Diagnosis
- •30.5 Diagnosis
- •30.6 Treatment
- •30.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •31.1 Introduction
- •31.2 Pathophysiology
- •31.3 Case Presentation
- •31.4 Case Discussion
- •31.5 Clinical Presentation
- •31.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •32.1 Introduction
- •32.2 Pathophysiology
- •32.3 Case Presentation
- •32.4 Case Discussion
- •32.6 Diagnosis
- •32.7 Additional Diagnostic Evaluations
- •32.8 Apply ICHD-3 Diagnostic Criteria [9]
- •32.10 Management
- •32.11 Conclusion
- •References
- •33.1 Introduction
- •33.2 Pathophysiology
- •33.3 Case Presentation
- •33.4 Clinical Characteristics
- •33.5 Diagnostic Algorithm
- •33.6 Treatment
- •33.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •34.1 Introduction
- •34.2 Pathophysiology
- •34.3 Case Presentation
- •34.4 Case Discussion
- •34.6 Diagnostic Algorithm
- •34.7 Treatment
- •34.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •35.1 Introduction
- •35.3 Case Presentation
- •35.4 Case Discussion
- •35.7 Treatment
- •35.7.1 Oxygen Therapy (100% Oxygen)
- •35.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •36.1 Introduction
- •36.2 Pathophysiology
- •36.3 Case Presentation
- •36.5 Diagnostic Algorithm
- •36.6 Treatment
- •36.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •37.1 Introduction
- •37.2 Pathophysiology
- •37.3 Case Presentation
- •37.4 Headache Characteristics
- •37.5 Case Discussion
- •37.6 Treatment
- •37.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •38.1 Introduction
- •38.2 Pathophysiology
- •38.3 Case Presentation
- •38.4 Clinical Presentation
- •38.5 Diagnostic Algorithm
- •38.6 Treatment
- •38.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •39.1 Introduction
- •39.3 Case Presentation
- •39.4 Case Discussion
- •39.6 ICHD-3 Diagnostic Criteria [28]
- •39.6.1 Diagnostic Criteria
- •39.7 Diagnostic Algorithm
- •39.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •40.1 Introduction
- •40.3 Case Presentation
- •40.4 Case Discussion
- •40.5.1 Diagnostic Algorithm
- •40.6 Treatment
- •40.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •41.1 Introduction
- •41.3 Case Presentation
- •41.4 Clinical Presentation
- •41.5 Differential Diagnosis
- •41.6 Conclusion
- •41.7 Key Messages
- •References
- •42.1 Introduction
- •42.2 Pathophysiology
- •42.3 Case Presentation
- •42.5 Case Discussion
- •42.6 Clinical Presentation
- •42.7 Diagnostic Algorithm [9]
- •42.8 Preeclampsia
- •42.9 Eclampsia
- •42.10 Fetal Assessment
- •42.11 Treatment
- •42.12 Antihypertensive Management [8]
- •42.14 Conclusion
- •References
- •43.1 Introduction
- •43.2 Pathophysiology
- •43.3 Case Presentation
- •43.4 Case Discussion
- •43.5 Clinical Manifestations
- •43.6 Diagnosis
- •43.7 Treatment
- •43.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •44.1 Introduction
- •44.2 Pathophysiology
- •44.3 Case Presentation
- •44.4 Case Discussion
- •44.6 Diagnostic Approach
- •44.7 Management
- •44.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •45.1 Introduction
- •45.2 Pathophysiology
- •45.3 Case Presentation
- •45.6 Treatment
- •45.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •46.1 Introduction
- •46.2 Pathophysiology
- •46.3 Case Presentation
- •46.4 Clinical Characteristics
- •46.5 Differential Diagnosis
- •46.6 Treatment
- •46.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •47.1 Introduction
- •47.2 Pathophysiology
- •47.3 Case Presentation
- •47.4 Case Discussion
- •47.5 Clinical Presentations
- •47.6 Diagnostic Algorithm
- •47.7 Differential Diagnosis
- •47.8 Treatment
- •47.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •48.1 Introduction
- •48.2 Pathophysiology
- •48.3 Case Presentation
- •48.4 Case Discussion
- •48.5 Clinical Characteristics
- •48.7 Treatment
- •48.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •49.1 Introduction
- •49.2 Pathophysiology
- •49.3 Case Presentation
- •49.4 Clinical Presentation
- •49.5 Diagnosis
- •49.6 Treatment
- •49.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •50.1 Introduction
- •50.2 Pathophysiology
- •50.3 Case Presentation
- •50.4 Case Discussion
- •50.5 Clinical Characteristics
- •50.6 Diagnosis
- •50.7 Treatment
- •50.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •51.1 Introduction
- •51.2 Case Presentation
- •51.3 Clinical Characteristics
- •51.4 Diagnosis
- •51.5 Treatment
- •51.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •52.1 Introduction
- •52.2 Pathophysiology
- •52.3 Case Presentation
- •52.4 Case Discussion
- •52.5 Clinical Characteristics
- •52.6 Diagnosis
- •52.6.1 Cervicogenic Headache
- •52.6.2 Migraine
- •52.6.3 Neck Pain
- •52.6.4 Demyelinating Lesions
- •52.6.5 Cervical Myelitis
- •52.6.6 Occipital Allodynia
- •52.6.7 Cervical Muscle Spasms
- •52.7 Treatment
- •52.7.2 Acupuncture
- •52.7.3 Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulations (TENS)
- •52.8 Minimally Invasive Treatment
- •52.8.1 Nerve Blocks
- •52.8.2 Botulinum Toxin A
- •52.8.3 Radio Frequency
- •52.8.4 Occipital Nerve Stimulation
- •52.9 Surgical Treatments
- •52.10 Conclusions
- •References
- •53.1 Introduction
- •53.2 Pathophysiology
- •53.3 Characteristics of Pain
- •53.4 Case Presentation
- •53.5 Case Discussion
- •53.6 Clinical Characteristics
- •53.8 Treatment
- •53.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •54.1 Introduction
- •54.2 Pathophysiology
- •54.3 Case Presentation
- •54.4 Case Discussion
- •54.5 Clinical Characteristics
- •54.6 Diagnostic Algorithm
- •54.7 Management
- •54.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •55.1 Introduction
- •55.2 Pathophysiology
- •55.3 Case Presentation

x
Contents
Part VI Headache Attributed to a Substance or Its Withdrawal
35 Headache Attributed to a Substance or Its Withdrawal:
Carbon Monoxide (CO)-Induced Headache . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 333
Esra Aciman Demirel
36 Cocaine-Induced Headache . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341
Utku Topbaş and Aynur Özge
Part VII Headache Attributed to Disorder of Homoeostasis
37 Headache Attributed to Airplane Travel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 353
Hilton Mariano da Silva Júnior and Leticia Bragalia Passarella
38 Diving Headache . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 365
Juliana Ramos de Andrade,
Marcos Antônio Inácio de Oliveira Filho, and Marcelo Valença
39 Dialysis Headache . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371
Ana Luisa de Lima Antoniazzi and Andre Cleriston Jose dos Santos
40 Headache Attributed to Pheochromocytoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 379
Christina I. Deligianni and Theodoros Mavridis
41 Headache Attributed to Hypertensive Encephalopathy . . . . . . . . . . . 387
Mario Fernando Prieto Peres
42 Headache Attributed to Preeclampsia or Eclampsia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 395
Andressa Regina Galego and Eliana Meire Melhado
43 Headache Attributed to Hypothyroidism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 407
Pablo Guarisco Ferreira, Edivan Rodrigo de Paula Ramos,
and Alcântara Ramos de Assis César
44 Cardiac Cephalalgia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 417
Vinícius da Silva Lessa de Oliveira, Victor Alfonso Garcia Ortiz,
and Vanise Grassi
Part VIII Headache or Facial Pain Attributed to Disorder
of the Cranium, Neck, Eyes, Ears, Nose, Sinuses,
Teeth, Mouth or Other Facial or Cervical Structure
45 Cervicogenic Headache . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 435
Marcelo Valença and Juliana Ramos de Andrade
46 Headache Attributed to Craniocervical Dystonia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 443
Míriam Carvalho Soares and Pedro Augusto Sampaio Rocha-Filho
47 Headache Attributed to Heterophoria Or Heterotropia . . . . . . . . . . . 451
Caio Vinicius de Meira Grava Simioni

Contents
48 Meningotheliomatous Meningioma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 459
Dilcan Kotan, Esen Çiçekli, and Derya Kara Genç
49 Headache or Facial Pain Attributed to Inflammation
of the Stylohyoid Ligament . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 467
Elder Sarmento
Part IX Painful Lesions of the Cranial Nerves
and Other Facial Pain
50 Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 477
Marcelo Valença
51 Nervus Intermedius Neuralgia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 485
Raiza Borges
52 Occipital Neuralgia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 491
Ida Fortini
53 Painful Optic Neuritis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 503
João José Freitas de Carvalho, Raimundo Neudson Maia Alcantara,
and Renata De Oliveira Carvalho
54 Paratrigeminal Oculosympathetic (Raeder’s) Syndrome . . . . . . . . . . 513
Renan Domingues
xi
55 Burning Mouth Syndrome . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 519
Daniela Aparecida de Godoi Gonçalves, Juliana Stuginski Barbosa,
and Marlon Ferreira Dias

Part I
Migraine

Chapter 1
Hemiplegic Migraine
ElcioJuliatoPiovesan
andMarcoAntonioTakashiUtiumi
1.1 Introduction
Hemiplegic migraine (HM) is a rare migraine subtype marked by transient motor
auras with or without headache, typically starting in childhood or adolescence [1,
2]. It is linked to ion channel gene mutations that disrupt neuronal excitability and
lower thresholds for cortical spreading depolarization (CSD). The classic triad
includes non-motor aura, motor aura, and headache, though presentations vary
widely even within families carrying the same mutation. HM may also involve
ataxia, epilepsy, and cognitive symptoms, with a tendency to diminish in severity
over time [2]. Diagnosis is clinical in familial cases (FHM), but sporadic forms
(SHM) often require imaging and genetic testing. Treatment options remain limited,
and preventive strategies lack robust evidence.
1.2 Pathophysiology
HM is an autosomal dominant disorder with 80–90% penetrance [3], caused by
mutations in known genes such as the CACNA1A (FHM Type 1 [FHM1]), ATP1A2
(FHM2), SNC1A (FHM3), and, more recently, PRRT2 [4, 5]. However, in up to
80% of the cases, no genetic mutation is identied (classied as Familial hemiplegic migraine, other loci) [6], suggesting that the genetic heterogeneity of HM
extends beyond a Mendelian inheritance [7].
E. J. Piovesan (*)
Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
M. A. T. Utiumi
Clínica de Neurologia São José, São José, Brazil
Switzerland AG 2026
D. Uludüz et al. (eds.), Rare Causes of Headache Disorders, Headache,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-10242-3_1
3© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature

4
E. J. Piovesan and M. A. T. Utiumi
From a neurophysiological perspective, the auras accompanying HM attacks,
including the motor ones, are triggered by CSD [8]. This phenomenon might activate the trigeminal nerve at a peripheral level and provoke headaches [9]. CSD may
be succeeded by vascular changes and the production of proinammatory molecules, leading to a state of parenchymal inammation with the opening of pannexin 1 channels and inammasome activation [8]. The motor weakness that can develop
into hemiplegia in HM attacks is possibly the result of a prolonged aura since the
same patient can have typical FHM attacks interspersed with attacks of nonhemiplegic migraine with aura (MA) [8, 9].
FHM1 is caused by mutations in the CACNA1A gene (19p13.1) that encodes the
voltage-gated calcium channels alpha 1A subunit (Cav2.1). A gain-of-function
leads to their frequent opening and activation at lower voltages than those required
by channels in individuals without HM [8, 9]. An increase in glutamate secretion
[10] might, nally, favor the occurrence of CSD (Fig.1.1). FHM2 is associated
with the ATP1A2 gene (1q23.2), which encodes the alpha-2 subunit of the Na+/K+
ATPase pump. The loss-of-function effect may sustain a state of cortical hyperexcitability [10], which would explain epilepsy in cases of FHM [10]. On the other
hand, in FHM3 (SCN1A gene [2q24.3], alpha-1 subunit of the voltage-gated Na+
channel [Nav1.1]), the resulting gain-of-function may converge in a hyperexcitability state [10].
Fig. 1.1 Flow chart illustrating three types of Familial Hemiplegic Migraine (FHM) mechanisms.
1. **FHM Type I (CACNA1A):** Shows a gain-of-function in the CaV2.1 channel of excitatory
neurons, leading to increased glutamate release. 2. **FHM Type II (ATP1A2):** Depicts a Na+/
K+ ATPase channel in glial cells with normal and loss-of-function states, affecting glutamate regulation and inducing cortical spreading depression. 3. **FHM Type III (SCN1A):** Illustrates Nav
1.1 and CaV2.1 channels in inhibitory neurons, with gain-of-function in Ca channels and loss-offunction in Na channels, leading to epilepsy. Arrows indicate the ow of ions and neurotransmitters, with labels for normal and dysfunctional states

1 Hemiplegic Migraine
5
The propagation of CSD reaching the corticostriatal regions could explain
the severe motor decits in FHM1 [10]. During CSD, an increase in Ca2+ concentration in cortical neurons is observed, which is expected with a gain-offunction mutation of Cav2.1 in pyramidal cells [10]. There is an increase in
oxygen consumption and a consequent reduction in tissue O2 during vigorous
CSD [10]. In these experimental models, multiple CSDs may occur more frequently in homozygous models than in heterozygous ones [10]. In FHM1, it is
possible to observe glutamatergic changes while the GABAergic release is unaltered [10]. In addition, specialized core microcircuits of inhibitory interneurons
may be involved and responsible for maintaining the excitatory–inhibitory balance pathways necessary to transfer information while preventing runaway
excitation [10]. These microcircuits are essential for the correct processing of
sensory information (control of sensory gain, suppression, synchronization and
generation of cortical rhythms, formation of cell assemblies, and transfer of
information to higher areas) [1]. They are likely dysfunctional in FHM, leading
to alterations in cortical function and contributing to the development of
FHM [1].
1.3 Case Presentation
A 15-year-old female student with a history of paroxysmal headaches for 8years
presented at the headache clinic. She reported a sensation of water drops dripping
down her right arm, which quickly evolved into a loss of muscle strength in the
lower and upper right limbs, followed by difculty walking and moving her arm. A
few minutes later, visual changes appeared, consisting of images of lights and lines.
She also reported difculty speaking. The reduction in strength, the visualization of
lights, and the difculty in speaking lasted about an hour and a half. However, the
line images persisted for 24h in her eld of vision. A moderate headache with nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia followed all these symptoms. The pain worsened with body movements. She reported signicant cognitive impairment lasting
up to 36h. Previous attempts to control the disease had already been made with
propranolol and lamotrigine.
The patient’s mother has suffered from migraine with visual aura and sensation
of loss of muscle strength since she was 12years old. The patient had no history of
seizures. In the rst attack, she was hospitalized and underwent magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) and arterial and venous phase magnetic resonance angiography
(MRA) with no abnormal ndings. Lumbar puncture and transcranial Doppler
showed no abnormalities. Autonomic system disorders were investigated using a tilt
table test, but no abnormalities were found. Hematological and metabolic/endocrinological tests were all normal. The patient underwent a genetic study that revealed
alterations in the CACNA1A gene and was subsequently diagnosed with FHM1.
She started calcium channel blockers (unarizine) as a prophylactic treatment. In
6months, she had three moderate-intensity attacks and one of greater magnitude
with hemiparesis.

6
E. J. Piovesan and M. A. T. Utiumi
1.4 Case Discussion
This case demonstrates the complexity of HM.The motor aura aggregated with
visual, sensory, or speech symptoms in a patient with a migraine-type headache is
highly suggestive of HM.The diagnosis is based on the family history and, whenever possible, genetic testing. The results of prophylactic treatment are usually suboptimal. The acute treatment depends on the presentation of symptoms, primarily
whether cognitive dysfunction is present or not.
1.5 Clinical Characteristics
Like other migraine types, HM can present with four stages: (1) a premonitory
phase with non-headache symptoms; (2) an aura that includes motor symptoms; (3)
the headache phase; and (4) a recovery or postdromic stage (Fig.1.2). Generally, the
rst attack consists of a headache with aura but no hemiplegia. The number of
attacks throughout life varies, reaching up to 0.4/year [11]. Triggering factors
include physical and emotional stress and even pregnancy.
Premonitory Phase The semiological information on the premonitory phase is
lacking. This stage typically presents with symptoms such as insomnia, yawning,
fatigue, and irritability [12], indicating hypothalamic involvement.
Aura Phase The characteristics of the aura phase are fundamental for a correct
clinical diagnosis, as elegantly demonstrated by Bonemazzi [13]. The HM “core” is
the presence of two or more aura symptoms—TOGETHER, CONCOMITANT,
AGGREGATED—which differentiates it from other types of MA in which, when
more than one aura symptom occurs, they usually follow one another (each symptom in isolation) [1, 14] (Fig.1.2). In HM, four or more types of aura can occur in
the same attack in up to 72% of cases, three types in 30%, and, rarely, only one type
of aura in up to 5% of cases [1, 14, 15].
The total duration of all aura symptoms can vary from 10min to 7days, although
the most typical duration is 60–120min [14, 15]. Each symptom typically lasts
between 5 and 30min [1, 14, 15]. The classic sequence of aura presentation begins
with visual, sensory, motor, aphasic, and basilar manifestations. There may be other
types of aura with different combinations [1, 14].
Visual aura is reported in 74–97% of cases [1, 12, 14–16]. The symptoms include
impaired central vision, hemianopsia, blurred vision, scintillating scotoma, phosphenes, ickering lines, and zig-zag lines [14]. The symptom duration ranges from
5min to 12h (average of 2h) [1, 14, 15, 17].
Sensorial symptoms occur in up to 97% of patients and are characterized by
hypoesthesia, numbness, and paresthesia. The symptoms spread gradually and may
be ipsilateral or contralateral to the motor symptoms, and less frequently, bilateral
[1, 14–16]. The symptoms occur more frequently in the arms, hands, face, tongue,
legs, and body [14, 15]. It usually lasts 1–12h (average of 4h) [1, 14, 15, 17].

1 Hemiplegic Migraine
Fig. 1.2 Diagram illustrating the phases of migraines. The left side shows the “Aura Phase” with
two types: “Migraine with Aura” and “Hemiplegic Migraine.” Each type is divided into sections
labeled with symptoms: Visual, Motor, Sensory, and Speech/Language, marked as either weakness
(W) or symptoms (S). The right side depicts the “Headache Phase,” showing outcomes: “Migraine
with Aura without Headache,” “Migraine with Aura with Headache,” “Hemiplegic Migraine without Headache,” and “Hemiplegic Migraine with Headache.” Arrows indicate reversible symptoms.
7
Motor symptoms are characterized by weakness or paralysis in the hands, arms,
feet, legs, tongue, face, and body [1, 14–16]. The weakness, which is typically unilateral in most cases, has a gradual onset and usually lasts for ≥5min [1, 14, 15].
The motor decit can spread to the other side [16]. Unlike the different forms of
aura described above, motor aura can last from 30min to 24h (an average of 5h).
It may last longer than 24h in 8% and 2% of those with sporadic and familial forms,
respectively [
1]. Language symptoms occur in 60–81% of cases [1, 14–16] and are
characterized by alterations such as dysphasia, aphasia, dysarthria, and dysnomia.
Aphasia can be sensory or motor [1, 14–16]. Its duration varies from 1 to 12h [1,
14, 15, 17].
Brainstem aura symptoms are reported in 60–73% of cases, with manifestations
as diverse as decreased hearing, dizziness, tinnitus, a sensation of pressure and pain
in the ear, loss of balance, vertigo, clumsiness in the hands, dropping of objects,
dysarthria, diplopia, tongue stiffness, pharyngeal and tongue numbness, swallowing
difculties, drop attacks, and decreased level of consciousness [1, 13–16].
Some semiological aspects may be more suggestive of an HM aura than other
types of MA.Sensory symptoms are more extensive in HM, spreading through the
face, arms, feet, and legs [1]. Visual symptoms begin peripherally as a scotoma,
whereas with MA, the onset of symptoms is more central, characterized by zig-zag
lines [1, 14]. In aphasic aura, the MA patient complains of language changes; in
HM, impaired comprehension is more common. In HM, the motor aura can last
much longer. The typical clinical pattern is complete recovery of symptoms,

8
E. J. Piovesan and M. A. T. Utiumi
although hemiplegia and altered consciousness may persist for weeks [18, 19].
There are cases in which repetitive motor auras may evolve with irreversible brain
damage associated with tissue atrophy, infarcts, cognitive decits, and, in extreme
situations, death [20].
Seizures may be observed and usually occur more frequently in the rst few
years of life. Some patients with ATP1A2 mutation can also have seizures lasting an
average of 3.8±6.1h, while in those with a mutated CACNA1A, they last an average of 24.3±23.5h [11]. Individuals with the same mutations and members of the
same family may also exhibit clinical variability, suggesting a role for additional
factors (e.g., environmental elements) in the expression of the phenotype [3].
Headache Phase Headaches facilitate the diagnosis; however, the patient may
present with aura but no pain complaints [15]. The headache is unilateral in 50–80%
and bilateral in 40–50% of cases [1, 14, 15]. Unilateral pain may be xed on the
same side or shift to the other side between attacks [16]. The headache may be
described as pulsatile, pressure, squeezing, throbbing, or stabbing.
The pain is of moderate to severe intensity and worsens with physical activity. It
starts during or after the visual aura or, very rarely, before [14, 15]. Its duration varies from 4 to 72h, with some cases lasting from 5min to 5days [1, 14, 15]. Nonheadache symptoms might occur during headache attacks and include nausea
(84–94%), vomiting (58–80%), phonophobia (70–92%), photophobia (70–99%),
fever (8–58%), and mental confusion and disorientation (36–81%). Other manifestations have been reported, including autonomic symptoms (e.g., nasal congestion,
lacrimation), motion sickness, Raynaud’s syndrome, loss of consciousness, and seizures [17]. In the pediatric population, irritability, agitation, and drowsiness may
occur [17]. More severe symptoms include visual hallucinations, meningismus,
limb alienation, apraxia, hyperacusis, and torticollis [21].
Postdromic Phase The postdromic stage is the least understood. The non-painful
symptoms include motor, cognitive, and cerebellar clinical manifestations. They
can last from a few hours to several days.
Interictal Phase
Patients may present abnormal functioning between attacks, a
common nding in familial forms, emphasizing the role of the underlying genetic
alteration in other physiological processes and increasing the burden on patients.
Cerebellar signs are frequently found in FHM1, characterized by downbeat positioning nystagmus associated with ataxia in up to 60% of cases. In FHM2, these
ndings are rare [1, 22].
Some CACNA1A and ATP1A2 mutations are associated with mental retardation
and cognitive impairment after recurrent severe seizures [23, 24]. Those with symptom onset in the rst few years of life may present severe manifestations such as
coma and seizures, predictive symptoms of an unfavorable clinical evolution [1].
Patients with a mutated CACNA1A between 3 and 18years old with HM, torticollis, vertigo, and tonic upward gaze showed progression to cognitive dysfunction and
cerebellar atrophy (vermis) [25]. Seizures in HM patients can be of the partial or

1 Hemiplegic Migraine
9
generalized type, associated or not with fever [26]. Epilepsy begins in childhood
and usually precedes the onset of HM attacks [2]. It generally has a benign course,
with more frequent events occurring in FHM2. Epileptic seizures are generally
independent of migraine attacks [20].
1.6 Diagnostic Algorithm
Step 1: Clinical suspicion
• Identify key symptoms:
– Migraine with motor aura plus visual, sensory, and/or speech or language
aura; together, concomitant, or aggregated (Fig.1.2).
– Family history of HM.
– Semiological cyclical behaviors start in life’s rst and second decades. It is
possible to observe a reduction in intensity and severity over time.
Step 2: Initial diagnostic workup
• Perform brain MRI:
– Assess for white matter hyperintensities (WMHs).
– Cerebellar atrophy (with or without ataxia).
– Unilateral cytotoxic edema has been observed during attacks in the spo-
radic type.
– Middle cerebral artery vasospasm has been described in a third of patients,
with 12.5% evolving into vasogenic edema.
Step 3: Consider genetic testing
• Conduct genetic testing:
– Test for CACNA1A (FHM1), ATP1A2 (FHM2), SCN1A (FHM3), or
PRRT2 gene mutations. Offspring of patients with FHM have a 50%
chance of inheriting the disorder.
Step 4: Additional diagnostic evaluations
• Perform EEG:
– Abnormalities during or immediately after the end of seizures might be
observed in up to 85% of cases (asymmetry of the tracing, diffuse slow
waves on the symptomatic side, and slowing occipital activity).
• Cerebrospinal uid analysis:
– Exclude other differential diagnoses such as meningoencephalitis and sub-
arachnoid hemorrhage. Consider Headache and Neurological Decits with
Cerebrospinal Fluid Lymphocytosis (HaNDL), but note that the symptoms
are typically limited to 3months in this syndrome.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
