Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5214_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •About the Authors
- •Further Reading
- •2.1.1 HA Fillers
- •2.1.2.4 PLLA (Poly-L-Lactic Acid) Fillers
- •2.1.2.5 PMMA (Polymethyl Methacrylate) Fillers
- •2.1.2.6 PAAG (Polyacrylamide Gel) Fillers
- •2.2.3 Cross-Linking Process
- •2.2.4 Dialysis or Washing
- •2.2.5 Cutting
- •2.2.6 Filling
- •2.2.7 Sterilization Process
- •2.3.1.2 Fluid Mechanics
- •2.1.2 Non-HA Fillers
- •2.1.2.1 Collagen Fillers
- •2.1.2.2 Ca Fillers
- •2.1.2.3 PCL (Polycaprolactone) Fillers
- •2.3.1.3 Rheology
- •2.3.2.1 G′: Elastic Modulus
- •2.3.2.2 G″: Viscous Modulus
- •2.3.2.3 G*: Complex Modulus
- •2.3.2.4 Phase Angle (Tangent δ)
- •2.3.2.5 Cohesion
- •Perceived Cohesion Test
- •Dispersion Test
- •Drop Weight Test
- •Compression Force Test
- •Flexibility Test
- •Further Reading
- •3.3 Retaining Ligaments
- •3.5.1 Subgalea-Frontalis Space
- •3.5.6 Prezygomatic Space
- •3.5.9 Prebuccal Space
- •3.5.11 Premental Space
- •Further Reading
- •4.1 Design Guidelines
- •4.1.4 Lateral View: Ricketts Line
- •4.2 Anesthesia: Nerve Block
- •4.2.1 Supratrochlear Nerve/Supraorbital Nerve
- •4.3 Cannula or Needle Selection
- •4.3.1 Cannula
- •4.4 Injection Techniques
- •4.4.1.8 Mantoux Injection Technique
- •4.4.1.9 Sandwich Technique
- •4.5 Basic Techniques by Area
- •4.6.1.2 Key Methodological Steps
- •4.6.1.3 Study Result
- •4.7.1 Filler Molding
- •4.7.2 Filler Degradation Test
- •Further Reading
- •5.1 Upper Face
- •5.1.2 Temple
- •5.2 Midface
- •5.2.2.1 Terminology
- •5.2.2.4 Injection Skill
- •Needle Injection
- •Cannula Injection
- •5.2.4.1 Design
- •5.2.4.2 Anesthesia
- •5.2.4.4 Injection Technique
- •5.2.5 Midcheek Groove
- •5.2.5.2 Treatment
- •5.2.7 Nose
- •5.2.7.3 Injection Technique
- •5.2.8 Nasolabial Fold
- •5.3 Lower Face
- •5.3.3.2 Injection Technique
- •5.3.4.1 Design
- •5.3.4.2 Anatomy
- •5.4 Skin Booster Procedures
- •5.4.1 Manual Injection Techniques
- •Further Reading
- •6.1.2 Edema
- •6.1.5.2 Granuloma
- •6.1.6 Infection
- •6.2.1.1 Extravascular Compression
- •6.2.1.2 Intravascular Emboli
- •6.2.2 Skin Necrosis
- •Decompression
- •Revascularization
- •Scar Treatment
- •6.2.3 Vascular Complication: Blindness
- •6.3.1.1 Hyaluronic Acid Turnover
- •6.3.2.4 Clinical Implications
- •Further Reading

56
Fig. 2.56 Difference of dynamic forces that contribute to deformation of HA llers between supercial and deep plane
2 Types ofFillers andRheological Considerations forHA (Hyaluronic Acid) Fillers
Doctors should choose a ller with proper
rheological properties according to the procedure
part, the patient’s facial conditions, and the procedure goal. They also need to consider the following in advanced.
First, doctors should assess whether molding
would be actively needed after a procedure. For
example, a nose ller procedure is one of the
most common ller procedures in the nation. In a
procedure on a low nose with asymmetry between
the nasal bones, there is a big possibility that the
nose shape will seem asymmetrical after the procedure no matter how careful the doctor might
have been. In such asymmetry cases, doctors
should predict that the patient will need correction to some degree after a molding-based procedure. It will be difcult to correct the shape
through molding after the procedure is over.
Doctors can create a symmetrical shape overall
more conveniently by injecting a ller in small
doses based on the presence and degree of asymmetry and implementing molding simultaneously
from the start.
Second, doctors should consider the degree of
external force or facial expression changes to
which a ller will be exposed. The bridge of the
nose, for instance, can have uneven skin due to
facial expression changes in the middle of the
forehead and nasal radix and can be pressed by
glasses or sunglasses after a procedure. In consultations before a procedure, doctors should predict the possibilities of changing ller shapes due
to severe changes to the patient’s facial expressions in the middle of the forehead after a procedure, so they should tell them to the patient.
When necessary, they also need to take additional
treatment with a toxin on the middle of the forehead and nasal radix before or after a ller procedure, and they should be given explanations and
cautions when wearing glasses or sunglasses.
When there is high pressure to push down on the
skin and soft tissues around a ller injection, the
ller will have difculties maintaining its shape
right after the procedure due to compression following the procedure. In a nose with a big hollow
part, for instance, the compressed area will not

2.6 Considerations forSelecting HA Fillers
57
revive easily, especially in the nasal radix with
the injected ller spreading easily after the procedure. Before a procedure, doctors need to pinch
the skin of the compressed part and assess the
degree of the skin’s adherence to check the pressure of the skin and soft tissues in the hollow part.
If the pressure of the skin and soft tissues is high
in the part where a procedure will be implemented, there is a big possibility that the nose
shape created by the ller procedure will not last
and easily sink due to compression following the
procedure. In such a case, doctors should have
talks with their patients to choose between a ller
that is harder than average to maintain the nose
shape created by a procedure even a little bit or a
ller of average strength based on a prediction of
some sinking and then correction according to
the progress.
Finally, doctors should have knowledge about
the characteristics of volume changes in each HA
ller product they use.
Given the rheological properties, products that
are fully hydrated in the manufacturing process
swell less by attracting water after an injection.
Biphasic llers have their HA molecules entangled tightly with each other structurally and thus
attract less water and swell less than soft monophasic llers that have abundance spaces between
molecules due to weak cross-linking. Even in the
group of monophasic llers, however, some are
made hard by causing HA molecules to entangle
with each other through active cross-linking.
Thus, they have less space between HA molecules and swell less after a procedure than biphasic llers and soft monophasic llers with less
cross-linking.
HA ller products mixed with free HA may
seem to highlight the initial volume in the early
days after a procedure as free HA absorbs water
and swells. Free HA is, however, degraded and
absorbed a few days after the procedure with
only the cross-linked HA components kept. As a
result, the ller dose is reduced from the initial
injection. Patients may have different reactions to
the amount of mixed free HA. In some cases,
they are satised with the outcome right after a
procedure and complain about the fast speed of
the ller fading away as that part may seem even
hollower in a couple of weeks than in the initial
state.
HA llers with abundant incomplete crosslinking due to pendant-type BDDEs swell more
easily without any special reason than other HA
ller products despite similar viscoelasticity and
C-MOD, which is the ratio of complete crosslinking provided by the manufacturers. When
some products have more serious and persistent
swelling than other products and cannot be
explained through rheology, doctors should have
suspicion about the action of BDDEs based on
incomplete cross-linking. The possibilities of
delayed immune reactions grow when such products are used in too large doses at a time or in
procedures that are repeated too often.
Accordingly, it is recommended to have enough
observations of clinical progress before deciding
to increase the product dose.
2.6 Considerations forSelecting
HA Fillers
2.6.1 Fillers forIntradermal
Injection
The original indication of llers is to supplement
dermal deciencies, meaning it is a tool for treating situations where the dermis is decient for
various reasons. However, in reality, it has been
more widely used for volumization purposes
through deep subdermal injection. From the perspective of material saturation, llers tend to
expand after injection, typically exceeding the
injected volume. Researchers developing llers
refer to this as “% saturation”. For example, the
phrase “20% saturation” means that after ller
injection, the volume increases by approximately
20% by attracting water. While not an ofcial
term, it helps understand the properties of llers.
As a result, due to the increase in volume after
ller injection, it is easy to experience nodularity
when palpating the ller after intradermal injection. As alternatives, methods such as injecting
into the subcutaneous fat layer or using less ller
than the actual degree of wrinkling have been
used. However, recently, methods have been

58
2 Types ofFillers andRheological Considerations forHA (Hyaluronic Acid) Fillers
developed to reduce the formation of nodules
after intradermal injection, such as mixing crosslinked HA with non-cross-linked HA or introducing HA llers with signicantly reduced
cross-linking ratios.
These methods are particularly effective for
wrinkles around the chin, periorbital wrinkles,
perioral wrinkles, forehead wrinkles, etc. In other
words, they can be used without the concern of
nodularity even for dynamic wrinkles, not just
static wrinkles.
2.6.2 Fillers forSubcutaneous
Injection
In the subcutaneous layer of the face, there are
often major blood vessels passing through. In
particular, as the facial artery transitions into the
angular artery, it passes through the subcutaneous
layer. Additionally, major blood vessels in the
region of the temple are spatially situated in the
subcutaneous layer, surrounded by the supercial
temporal fascia (Fig.2.57).
Performing procedures without a thorough
understanding of the vascular anatomy at the
treatment site increases the likelihood of vascular
complications. This risk is further heightened
when using needles, as they can easily puncture
blood vessels. Consequently, deep-layer
injections (just above the periosteum) are often
recommended as a safer ller technique.
However, although the deepest layers are typically avascular planes, there are situations where
subcutaneous layer injections are necessary to
achieve precise and optimal ller results.
Therefore, avoiding subcutaneous layer injections altogether may not always be the optimal
approach.
No matter how sensitive a practitioner’s hands
may be, it’s hard to determine the exact depth at
which needles or cannulas travel within the subcutaneous layer. Especially feeling the sensation of
penetrating through thin facial muscles into deeper
layers requires an extremely sensitive touch, which
many practitioners may not possess.
Ultimately, during procedures, the depth at
which needles or cannulas travel can be condently estimated to be just above the periosteum,
at the top of the subcutaneous fat layer, or when
injecting into the dermis. When working within
the subcutaneous layer, a technique involving the
sensation of needles or cannulas brushing against
the underside of the dermis at the top of the subcutaneous fat layer is considered a method with a
low risk of vascular accidents.
If it’s unavoidable to inject llers into the subcutaneous layer, it’s safest to inject them at the
top of the subcutaneous fat layer, just beneath the
dermis.
Injecting llers at the top of the subcutaneous
fat layer is highly benecial, particularly when
treating nasolabial folds. It’s also a helpful injection layer for treating Indian bands.
Skin
Subculaneous fat
Supercial
temporal fascia
Deep
temporal fascia
Temporalis
Fig. 2.57 Supercial temporal artery course in the temple area. The supercial temporal artery is embedded within
the supercial temporal fascia but spatially resides in the supercial fat layer

2.7 Basic Considerations fortheUse oftheHA Filler Degrading Enzyme Hyaluronidase
59
2.6.3 Fillers forSupraperiosteal
Injection
Typically, this depth represents an avascular
plane, making it safe for procedures. Therefore,
injections are often performed using a cannula or
a needle technique involving touching the bone
before injection.
However, even in this scenario, absolute certainty cannot be guaranteed. For instance, in
areas like the forehead with bony contours, the
curvature of the bone may prevent the cannula
from maintaining the depth of the deeper layer.
Additionally, when injecting ller using a needle
technique with bone touch in the temple area,
there is a possibility of encountering the deep
temporal artery. Furthermore, when injecting
after bone touch, there are instances where the
needle tip may not remain just above the periosteum but may be displaced into a shallower layer
due to the injection process itself, caused by the
injected ller.
When injecting into deeper layers, it’s crucial
to consider whether the injected ller easily
migrates to other areas. For example, when
injecting deep-layer llers into the nasolabial
area, the ller may migrate to the upper lateral
part of the face due to facial expressions, causing
the nasolabial fold to appear deeper instead.
2.7 Basic Considerations
fortheUse oftheHA Filler
Degrading Enzyme
Hyaluronidase
HA llers are dissolved by an enzyme material
called hyaluronidase to address side effects or
complaints with a shape after an HA ller injection. Hyaluronidase is especially useful in urgent
situations where the side effects of an HA ller
injection happen in blood vessels.
HA llers should be dissolved by the injection
of hyaluronidase after a procedure in the following cases: the ller is not injected in the intended
location; the ller is injected too much; there is a
huge difference between right and left; the
injected ller has moved to a different location;
the ller holds together hard to form a lump or
bead; the mass of the injected ller makes it
uncomfortable to move the face; the patient has
complaints with the shape; the parts around the
ller injection are swollen and have inammation
due to an allergic reaction; severe inammation
and foreign body reactions have caused granuloma; the injected ller is reected bluish on the
skin due to the tyndall phenomenon on thin parts
of the skin; and side effects with blood vessels
are suspected or in progress already due to the
injected ller.
“The Right Ways to Use Hyaluronidase to
Prevent the Side Effects of HA Fillers” will later
discuss the details of how to use hyaluronidase to
dissolve an injected HA ller as much as is
intended. This section will cover the basic considerations to use hyaluronidase.
First, doctors should consider the dose of
hyaluronidase marked in units needed to dissolve
an HA ller. In the past, some argued that 150
units or so should be enough to dissolve 1ml of
an HA ller according to a calculation of 5~15
units of hyaluronidase to dissolve 0.1ml of an
HA ller based on the basic amount of hyaluronidase needed to break the structure of HA molecules. These units may be enough to dissolve to
some extent the biphasic llers with a low crosslinking rate or monophasic llers whose ller
particles are not entangled with each other too
severely in a sticky way due to their weak crosslinking. They are, however, insufcient in completely dissolving HA llers in a hard structure
due to the strong entanglement of HA molecules
to highlight a lot of volume these days. The
researcher uses a minimum of 200~300 units of
hyaluronidase to dissolve 1ml of a soft HA ller
for wrinkles and 500 units of hyaluronidase or
more to dissolve 1ml of an HA ller with reinforced consistency for volume.
Second, it is critical to consider the time for
hyaluronidase to take effects. Doctors should rst
gure out in advance the differences in reaction
time when dissolving biphasic and monophasic
llers with hyaluronidase. They must have
knowledge about the time it takes hyaluronidase
to dissolve the ller of their choice in an emergency where an HA ller should be dissolved

60
2 Types ofFillers andRheological Considerations forHA (Hyaluronic Acid) Fillers
right away due to side effects in blood vessels.
Based on this knowledge, doctors can properly
use hyaluronidase according to each HA ller
product and obtain optimal results when such
side effects happen.
Third, doctors should consider the active duration during which hyaluronidase maintains its
effects over time to some extent after being
injected into the human body. Based on animal
experiments, it has been reported that injected
hyaluronidase will maintain its functions for 6h
from the injection. There are no particular problems if doctors wait a day on average to repeat a
hyaluronidase injection into the HA ller mass or
inject a new ller after the old one is dissolved.
Once exposed to blood in blood vessels, hyaluronidase will abruptly disappear and within
minutes cannot perform its roles. When using
hyaluronidase to dissolve HA ller particles
blocking a blood vessel, doctors should predict
that it will not play its roles any longer than a
short period.
Fourth, different criteria should be applied
to use hyaluronidase for suspected side effects
in blood vessels after an HA ller injection than
its injection into a ller mass. When trying to
dissolve an HA ller due to side effects in blood
vessels, doctors cannot accurately inject hyaluronidase directly into it like when there is a
mass. They have to inject widely a hyaluronidase solution in parts where the ischemia of
blood vessels is suspected so that it will perme-
ate in blood vessels. Even more amounts of
hyaluronidase should be used than the simple
dissolution of a ller mass (Fig. 2.58). It is
allowed to use up to 1500~3000 units of hyaluronidase at a time. Hyaluronidase will lose its
action as an enzyme material much faster inside
blood vessels than outside them as it can disappear in 4~5min. Doctors need to check the situations in which blood ows return after the rst
injection and repeat an injection in 10~15min
when necessary.
Fifth, it is recommended to dilute the hyaluronidase of enough physiological saline
before using it and massage the injected area
after the injection of a hyaluronidase solution
so that it will spread as evenly as possible and
increase its contact surface with the ller. As
mentioned in the section above, hyaluronidase
cannot penetrate into ller particles due to its
high molecular weight and can only work on
particles directly touching it. As HA chains in
contact with the solution are degraded and broken into smaller units, the spaces become
larger and work to expand the contact areas
gradually. It is important to dilute hyaluronidase in enough amounts of physiological saline
in order to inject a hyaluronidase solution
evenly and expand the area of ller particles
that are in contact with it as much as possible
(Fig.2.59).
Sixth, when a ller mass becomes lumpy to
form a lump or nodule, the affected areas will
Fig. 2.58 Inltration
of hyaluronidase
solution through the
vessel wall

2.7 Basic Considerations fortheUse oftheHA Filler Degrading Enzyme Hyaluronidase
Fig. 2.59 The action mechanism of hyaluronidase acting on HA ller material
61
have poor blood circulation. Tissue reactions will
become more severe in the collagen capsules
enveloping the mass. The capsules on the outside
become slightly thicker and form a biolm. In
such a case, there will not be enough dissolution
on the surface in contact with hyaluronidase,
which eventually fails to penetrate the ller mass
to dissolve the lump or nodule. When trying to
dissolve piles of lumps or nodules in hard collagen capsules for certain, doctors need to inject a
hyaluronidase solution into the HA ller mass as
much as possible so that hyaluronidase diluted in
a saline can move in between the particles inside
the mass rather than on the surface (Fig.2.60).
Finally, a hyaluronidase injection can cause
allergic reactions related to allergies such as itchiness and skin are. Doctors should always be
prepared for these reactions when using hyaluronidase. Some recommend a skin test before
using hyaluronidase. It is a good decision to prepare antihistamine and steroid injections for the
treatment of potential allergic reactions.

62
2 Types ofFillers andRheological Considerations forHA (Hyaluronic Acid) Fillers
Fig. 2.60 Two injection methods of hyaluronidase solution for HA ller mass
Further Reading
1. Tezel A, Fredrickson GH. The science of hyaluronic acid dermal llers. J Cosmet Laser Ther.
2008;10:35–42.
2. Park KY, Kim HK, Kim BJ. Comparative study of
hyaluronic acid llers by invitro and invivo testing. J
Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28(5):565–8.
3. Flynn TC, etal. Comparative histology of intradermal
implantation of mono and biphasic hyaluronic acid
llers. Dermatol Surg. 2011;37(5):637–43.
4. Park S, etal. Investigation of the degradation- retarding
effect caused by the low swelling capacity of a novel
hyaluronic acid ller developed by solid-phase crosslinking technology. Ann Dermatol. 2014;26(3)
5. Pierre S, et al. Basics of dermal ller rheology.
Dermatol Surg. 2015;41:S120–6.
6. Kablik J, et al. Comparative physical properties
of hyaluronic acid dermal ller. Dermatol Surg.
2009;35:302–12.
7. Falcone SJ, etal. Cross-linked hyaluronic acid dermal llers: a comparison of rheological properties. J
Biomed Mater Res. 2008;87A:264–71.
8. Borrell M, etal. Lifting capacities of hyaluronic acid
llers. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2011;13:21–7.
9. Stern R, etal. Hyaluronan catabolism: a new metabolic pathway. Eur J Cell Biol. 2004;83:317–25.
10. Kim JE, et al. Hyaluronic acid llers: history and
overview. Facial Plast Surg. 2011;27:523–8.
11. Åke Öhrlund J, Edsman KLM. The myth of the
“biphasic” hyaluronic acid ller. Dermatol Surg.
2015;41(Suppl 1):S358–64.
12. Rhee DY, etal. Efcacy and safety of a new monophasic hyaluronic acid ller in the correction of nasolabial folds: a randomized, evaluator-blinded, split-face
study. J Dermatolog Treat. 2014;25(5):448–52.
13. Kopera D, et al. An open-label uncontrolled, multicenter study for the evaluation of the efcacy and
safety of the dermal ller Princess VOLUME in
the treatment of nasolabial folds. Biomed Res Int.
2015:195328.
14. Philipp-Dormston WG, et al. Evaluating perceived
naturalness of facial expression after llers to the nasolabial folds and lower face with standardized video
and photography. Dermatol Surg. 2018;44(6):826–32.
15. Ramos-e-Silva M, et al. STYLAGE: a range of
hyaluronic acid dermal llers containing mannitol.
Physical properties and review of the literature. Clin
Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2013;6:257–61.
16. Sundaram H, et al. Biophysical characteristics of
hyaluronic acid soft-tissue llers and their relevance to aesthetic applications. Plast Reconstr Surg.
2013;132:5S.
17. Kho I-S, Lee W.Filler complication. Springer; 2019.
p.27–40.

Further Reading
63
18. Seungmin O, Kim B.Safe ller injection technique
demonstration using live imaging tools. DAEHAN;
2017.
19. Edsman K, etal. gel properties of hyaluronic acid dermal llers. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38:1170–9.
20. Yang B, etal. determination of modication degree
in BDDE-modied hyaluronic acid hydrogel by SEC/
MS.Carbohydr Polym. 2015;131:233–9.
21. Pereira H, etal. Hyaluronic acid. Part of the advances
in experimental medicine and biology book series.
AEMB. 2018;1059:137–53.
22. Ascher B, et al. 12-Month follow-up, randomized
comparison of effectiveness and safety of two hyaluronic acid llers for treatment of severe nasolabial
folds. Dermatol Surg. 2017;43(3):389–95.
23. Philipp-Dormston WG, et al. Perceived naturalness
of facial expression after hyaluronic acid ller injection in nasolabial folds and lower face. J Cosmet
Dermatol. 2020;19(7):1600–6.
24. da Costa A, etal. Durability of three different types
of hyaluronic acid llers in skin: are there differences
among biphasic, monophasic monodensied, and
monophasic polydensied products? Aesthetic Surg
Jour. 2016;37(5):573–81.
25. Shu XZ, et al. In situ crosslinkable hyaluronan
hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials.
2004;25(7-8):1339–48.
26. Andre P, etal. Free radical scavenging properties of
mannitol and its role as a constituent of hyaluronic
acid llers: a literature review. Int J Cosmet Sci.
2016:27.
27. Wende FJ, etal. determination of substitution position
in hyaluronic acid hydrogels using NMR and MS based
methods. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;136:1348–57.
28. Hobar, etal. Porous hydroxyapatite granules for alloplastic enhancement of the facial region. Clin Plast
Surg. 2000;27:557–69.
29. Edsman KL, etal. Is there a method that can measure cohesivity? Cohesion by sensory evaluation
compared with other test methods. Dermatol Surg.
2015;41:S365–72.
30. Lee W, etal. Clinical application of a new hyaluronic
acid ller based on its rheological properties and
the anatomical site of injection. Biomed Dermatol.
2018;2(1)
31. Keen MA.Hyaluronic acid in dermatology. SKINmed.
2017;15(6):441–8.
32. Stocks D, etal. Rheological evaluation of the physical
properties of hyaluronic acid dermal llers. J Drugs
Dermatol. 2011;10(9):974–80.
33. Rzany B, etal. An 18-month follow-up, randomized
comparison of effectiveness and safety of two hyaluronic acid llers for treatment of moderate nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg. 2017;43(1):58–65.
34. Glogau RG, Kane MAC. Effect of injection techniques on the rate of local adverse events in patients
implanted with nonanimal hyaluronic acid gel dermal
llers. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34(Suppl 1):S105–9.
35. Choi SC, etal. Modulation of biomechanical properties
of hyaluronic acid hydrogels by crosslinking agents. J
Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2015;103(9):3072–80.
36. De Boulle K, et al. A review of the metabolism
of 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether-crosslinked
hyaluronic acid dermal llers. Dermatol Surg.
2013;39(12):1758–66.
37. Guo X, et al. Bone resorption in mentum induced
by unexpected soft-tissue ller. Aesthet Surg J.
2018;38(10):Np147–Np149.
38. Landau M, Fagien S. Science of hyaluronic acid
beyond lling: broblasts and their response to
the extracellular matrix. Plast Reconstruct Surg.
2015;136(5 Suppl):188s–95s.
39. Mochizuki M, etal. Evaluation of the invivo kinetics and biostimulatory effects of subcutaneously
injected hyaluronic acid ller. Plast Reconstruct Surg.
2018;142(1):112–21.

Anatomical Considerations
forFiller Procedures
3
3.1 Vessels andNerves
The face contains countless vessels, and it is
practically impossible to inject llers without
damaging the vessels at all. The reason why we
should know the vessel structure and positioning
relationship of the arteries is to avoid these complications which can lead to skin necrosis and
visual complications. Figure3.1 shows the facial
supraorbital and supratrochlear arteries which
most likely to cause such complications. Of
course, if the ller is injected into the supercial
a
b
temporal artery, it can reach the ophthalmic
artery via the supraorbital or supratrochlear
artery, both able to cause eventually visual
complications.
The facial artery usually travels upward near
the middle of the mandible lower margin and the
anterior boundary of the masseter muscle. It is
relatively safe to inject ller in the supercial fat
layer around the jowl because the vessels are
deeply located at the point they pass the mandibular bone (Fig. 3.1a, b). This upward-facing
artery can be bent around the corners of the
Fig. 3.1 Arteries of the face
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2025
G. Hong et al., The Art and Science of Filler Injection,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-9215-6_3
65

66
Fig. 3.2 Vascular
structures of the temple
Sentinel
(Zygomaticotem
poral) vein
Superficial layer
of
deep temporal
fascia (DTF)
Middle
temporal vein
3 Anatomical Considerations forFiller Procedures
Superficial
temporal fat
zygomatic arch
(Red pin)
pad
mouth and can be used to drive up and down the
facial muscles. In addition, the ascending facial
artery, traveling in and out of the nasolabial folds,
produces several branches to the nose and lips.
The soft tissue of the lip is soft enough that the
pressure is low when the ller is injected, and the
abundance of blood supply does not easily cause
complications. However, in the case of the nose,
the ller injected can increase the pressure in the
surrounding tissue, since there is less space to
place the ller. Moreover, since the diameter of
the facial artery and its branches become narrower as they go up, these vessels can be blocked
with less pressure, and the blockage is likely to
cause local necrosis around the nose.
Although the facial artery sometimes does not
extend the dorsal nasal artery branch as it ascends,
the dorsal nasal artery and supraorbital artery
from the facial artery is clinically important in
causing visual complications by its connection to
the ophthalmic artery. It is also important to know
the depth at which the arteries are located in order
to know which depth is safe to inject.
It is relatively safe to inject ller directly
above the bone in the nasolabial area, as the
angular artery runs between the subcutaneous
and muscular layers. It can also be safer if the
physician presses along the course of the artery
distal to the injection site using the opposite hand
ngers when doing the ller injection, which can
prevent the ller from moving up the vessel.
When injecting ller near the eyebrow, one
will encounter the supratrochlear artery and
supraorbital artery, which originates deep inside
the inner part of the orbital rim and rises to the
supercial layer. The supratrochlear artery has
mainly supercial branches, but the supraorbital
artery usually divides into supercial branch and
deep branch at a point 1 centimeter above the
orbital rim. Unlike a nasolabial fold procedure,
this artery produces a deep branch, so the deep
layer injection is not necessarily safe. Therefore,
pressing the superorbital part of the orbital rim
with the opposite hand can prevent the movement
of the ller.
Other vascular structures to be kept in mind
are the transcanthal vein between the eyes, angular vein located just below the tear trough, and
the middle temporal vein which exists between
the supercial and deep layers of the temporal
fascia in the temple area (Fig. 3.2). Although
visual complications via veins are an unusual
event, there is an argument that the risk of vascular complications through the vein may be a
problem. However, it is impossible to perform
the procedure without causing any vascular damage, so you should rst focus much more on
avoiding the dangerous arteries and, if possible,
then the venous structures.
We don’t need to be too concerned about the
nerve structures during ller injection. This is
because it is rare to have serious side effects such
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
