Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5214_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
31 Мб
Скачать
56
Fig. 2.56 Difference of dynamic forces that contribute to deformation of HA llers between supercial and deep plane
2 Types ofFillers andRheological Considerations forHA (Hyaluronic Acid) Fillers
Doctors should choose a ller with proper rheological properties according to the procedure part, the patient’s facial conditions, and the pro­cedure goal. They also need to consider the fol­lowing in advanced.
First, doctors should assess whether molding would be actively needed after a procedure. For example, a nose ller procedure is one of the most common ller procedures in the nation. In a procedure on a low nose with asymmetry between the nasal bones, there is a big possibility that the nose shape will seem asymmetrical after the pro­cedure no matter how careful the doctor might have been. In such asymmetry cases, doctors should predict that the patient will need correc­tion to some degree after a molding-based proce­dure. It will be difcult to correct the shape through molding after the procedure is over. Doctors can create a symmetrical shape overall more conveniently by injecting a ller in small doses based on the presence and degree of asym­metry and implementing molding simultaneously from the start.
Second, doctors should consider the degree of external force or facial expression changes to which a ller will be exposed. The bridge of the nose, for instance, can have uneven skin due to facial expression changes in the middle of the forehead and nasal radix and can be pressed by glasses or sunglasses after a procedure. In con­sultations before a procedure, doctors should pre­dict the possibilities of changing ller shapes due to severe changes to the patient’s facial expres­sions in the middle of the forehead after a proce­dure, so they should tell them to the patient. When necessary, they also need to take additional treatment with a toxin on the middle of the fore­head and nasal radix before or after a ller proce­dure, and they should be given explanations and cautions when wearing glasses or sunglasses. When there is high pressure to push down on the skin and soft tissues around a ller injection, the ller will have difculties maintaining its shape right after the procedure due to compression fol­lowing the procedure. In a nose with a big hollow part, for instance, the compressed area will not
2.6 Considerations forSelecting HA Fillers
57
revive easily, especially in the nasal radix with the injected ller spreading easily after the proce­dure. Before a procedure, doctors need to pinch the skin of the compressed part and assess the degree of the skin’s adherence to check the pres­sure of the skin and soft tissues in the hollow part. If the pressure of the skin and soft tissues is high in the part where a procedure will be imple­mented, there is a big possibility that the nose shape created by the ller procedure will not last and easily sink due to compression following the procedure. In such a case, doctors should have talks with their patients to choose between a ller that is harder than average to maintain the nose shape created by a procedure even a little bit or a ller of average strength based on a prediction of some sinking and then correction according to the progress.
Finally, doctors should have knowledge about the characteristics of volume changes in each HA ller product they use.
Given the rheological properties, products that are fully hydrated in the manufacturing process swell less by attracting water after an injection. Biphasic llers have their HA molecules entan­gled tightly with each other structurally and thus attract less water and swell less than soft mono­phasic llers that have abundance spaces between molecules due to weak cross-linking. Even in the group of monophasic llers, however, some are made hard by causing HA molecules to entangle with each other through active cross-linking. Thus, they have less space between HA mole­cules and swell less after a procedure than bipha­sic llers and soft monophasic llers with less cross-linking.
HA ller products mixed with free HA may seem to highlight the initial volume in the early days after a procedure as free HA absorbs water and swells. Free HA is, however, degraded and absorbed a few days after the procedure with only the cross-linked HA components kept. As a result, the ller dose is reduced from the initial injection. Patients may have different reactions to the amount of mixed free HA. In some cases, they are satised with the outcome right after a procedure and complain about the fast speed of the ller fading away as that part may seem even
hollower in a couple of weeks than in the initial state.
HA llers with abundant incomplete cross­linking due to pendant-type BDDEs swell more easily without any special reason than other HA ller products despite similar viscoelasticity and C-MOD, which is the ratio of complete cross­linking provided by the manufacturers. When some products have more serious and persistent swelling than other products and cannot be explained through rheology, doctors should have suspicion about the action of BDDEs based on incomplete cross-linking. The possibilities of delayed immune reactions grow when such prod­ucts are used in too large doses at a time or in procedures that are repeated too often. Accordingly, it is recommended to have enough observations of clinical progress before deciding to increase the product dose.
2.6 Considerations forSelecting
HA Fillers
2.6.1 Fillers forIntradermal
Injection
The original indication of llers is to supplement dermal deciencies, meaning it is a tool for treat­ing situations where the dermis is decient for various reasons. However, in reality, it has been more widely used for volumization purposes through deep subdermal injection. From the per­spective of material saturation, llers tend to expand after injection, typically exceeding the injected volume. Researchers developing llers refer to this as “% saturation”. For example, the phrase “20% saturation” means that after ller injection, the volume increases by approximately 20% by attracting water. While not an ofcial term, it helps understand the properties of llers.
As a result, due to the increase in volume after ller injection, it is easy to experience nodularity when palpating the ller after intradermal injec­tion. As alternatives, methods such as injecting into the subcutaneous fat layer or using less ller than the actual degree of wrinkling have been used. However, recently, methods have been
58
2 Types ofFillers andRheological Considerations forHA (Hyaluronic Acid) Fillers
developed to reduce the formation of nodules after intradermal injection, such as mixing cross­linked HA with non-cross-linked HA or intro­ducing HA llers with signicantly reduced cross-linking ratios.
These methods are particularly effective for wrinkles around the chin, periorbital wrinkles, perioral wrinkles, forehead wrinkles, etc. In other words, they can be used without the concern of nodularity even for dynamic wrinkles, not just static wrinkles.
2.6.2 Fillers forSubcutaneous
Injection
In the subcutaneous layer of the face, there are often major blood vessels passing through. In particular, as the facial artery transitions into the angular artery, it passes through the subcutaneous layer. Additionally, major blood vessels in the region of the temple are spatially situated in the subcutaneous layer, surrounded by the supercial temporal fascia (Fig.2.57).
Performing procedures without a thorough understanding of the vascular anatomy at the treatment site increases the likelihood of vascular complications. This risk is further heightened when using needles, as they can easily puncture blood vessels. Consequently, deep-layer injections (just above the periosteum) are often recommended as a safer ller technique.
However, although the deepest layers are typi­cally avascular planes, there are situations where subcutaneous layer injections are necessary to achieve precise and optimal ller results. Therefore, avoiding subcutaneous layer injec­tions altogether may not always be the optimal approach.
No matter how sensitive a practitioner’s hands may be, it’s hard to determine the exact depth at which needles or cannulas travel within the subcu­taneous layer. Especially feeling the sensation of penetrating through thin facial muscles into deeper layers requires an extremely sensitive touch, which many practitioners may not possess.
Ultimately, during procedures, the depth at which needles or cannulas travel can be con­dently estimated to be just above the periosteum, at the top of the subcutaneous fat layer, or when injecting into the dermis. When working within the subcutaneous layer, a technique involving the sensation of needles or cannulas brushing against the underside of the dermis at the top of the sub­cutaneous fat layer is considered a method with a low risk of vascular accidents.
If it’s unavoidable to inject llers into the sub­cutaneous layer, it’s safest to inject them at the top of the subcutaneous fat layer, just beneath the dermis.
Injecting llers at the top of the subcutaneous fat layer is highly benecial, particularly when treating nasolabial folds. It’s also a helpful injec­tion layer for treating Indian bands.
Skin
Subculaneous fat
Supercial temporal fascia
Deep temporal fascia
Temporalis
Fig. 2.57 Supercial temporal artery course in the temple area. The supercial temporal artery is embedded within the supercial temporal fascia but spatially resides in the supercial fat layer
2.7 Basic Considerations fortheUse oftheHA Filler Degrading Enzyme Hyaluronidase
59
2.6.3 Fillers forSupraperiosteal Injection
Typically, this depth represents an avascular plane, making it safe for procedures. Therefore, injections are often performed using a cannula or a needle technique involving touching the bone before injection.
However, even in this scenario, absolute cer­tainty cannot be guaranteed. For instance, in areas like the forehead with bony contours, the curvature of the bone may prevent the cannula from maintaining the depth of the deeper layer. Additionally, when injecting ller using a needle technique with bone touch in the temple area, there is a possibility of encountering the deep temporal artery. Furthermore, when injecting after bone touch, there are instances where the needle tip may not remain just above the perios­teum but may be displaced into a shallower layer due to the injection process itself, caused by the injected ller.
When injecting into deeper layers, it’s crucial to consider whether the injected ller easily migrates to other areas. For example, when injecting deep-layer llers into the nasolabial area, the ller may migrate to the upper lateral part of the face due to facial expressions, causing the nasolabial fold to appear deeper instead.
2.7 Basic Considerations
fortheUse oftheHA Filler Degrading Enzyme Hyaluronidase
HA llers are dissolved by an enzyme material called hyaluronidase to address side effects or complaints with a shape after an HA ller injec­tion. Hyaluronidase is especially useful in urgent situations where the side effects of an HA ller injection happen in blood vessels.
HA llers should be dissolved by the injection of hyaluronidase after a procedure in the follow­ing cases: the ller is not injected in the intended location; the ller is injected too much; there is a huge difference between right and left; the injected ller has moved to a different location;
the ller holds together hard to form a lump or bead; the mass of the injected ller makes it uncomfortable to move the face; the patient has complaints with the shape; the parts around the ller injection are swollen and have inammation due to an allergic reaction; severe inammation and foreign body reactions have caused granu­loma; the injected ller is reected bluish on the skin due to the tyndall phenomenon on thin parts of the skin; and side effects with blood vessels are suspected or in progress already due to the injected ller.
“The Right Ways to Use Hyaluronidase to Prevent the Side Effects of HA Fillers” will later discuss the details of how to use hyaluronidase to dissolve an injected HA ller as much as is intended. This section will cover the basic con­siderations to use hyaluronidase.
First, doctors should consider the dose of hyaluronidase marked in units needed to dissolve an HA ller. In the past, some argued that 150 units or so should be enough to dissolve 1ml of an HA ller according to a calculation of 5~15 units of hyaluronidase to dissolve 0.1ml of an HA ller based on the basic amount of hyaluroni­dase needed to break the structure of HA mole­cules. These units may be enough to dissolve to some extent the biphasic llers with a low cross­linking rate or monophasic llers whose ller particles are not entangled with each other too severely in a sticky way due to their weak cross­linking. They are, however, insufcient in com­pletely dissolving HA llers in a hard structure due to the strong entanglement of HA molecules to highlight a lot of volume these days. The researcher uses a minimum of 200~300 units of hyaluronidase to dissolve 1ml of a soft HA ller for wrinkles and 500 units of hyaluronidase or more to dissolve 1ml of an HA ller with rein­forced consistency for volume.
Second, it is critical to consider the time for hyaluronidase to take effects. Doctors should rst gure out in advance the differences in reaction time when dissolving biphasic and monophasic llers with hyaluronidase. They must have knowledge about the time it takes hyaluronidase to dissolve the ller of their choice in an emer­gency where an HA ller should be dissolved
60
2 Types ofFillers andRheological Considerations forHA (Hyaluronic Acid) Fillers
right away due to side effects in blood vessels. Based on this knowledge, doctors can properly use hyaluronidase according to each HA ller product and obtain optimal results when such side effects happen.
Third, doctors should consider the active dura­tion during which hyaluronidase maintains its effects over time to some extent after being injected into the human body. Based on animal experiments, it has been reported that injected hyaluronidase will maintain its functions for 6h from the injection. There are no particular prob­lems if doctors wait a day on average to repeat a hyaluronidase injection into the HA ller mass or inject a new ller after the old one is dissolved. Once exposed to blood in blood vessels, hyal­uronidase will abruptly disappear and within minutes cannot perform its roles. When using hyaluronidase to dissolve HA ller particles blocking a blood vessel, doctors should predict that it will not play its roles any longer than a short period.
Fourth, different criteria should be applied to use hyaluronidase for suspected side effects in blood vessels after an HA ller injection than its injection into a ller mass. When trying to dissolve an HA ller due to side effects in blood vessels, doctors cannot accurately inject hyal­uronidase directly into it like when there is a mass. They have to inject widely a hyaluroni­dase solution in parts where the ischemia of blood vessels is suspected so that it will perme-
ate in blood vessels. Even more amounts of hyaluronidase should be used than the simple dissolution of a ller mass (Fig. 2.58). It is allowed to use up to 1500~3000 units of hyal­uronidase at a time. Hyaluronidase will lose its action as an enzyme material much faster inside blood vessels than outside them as it can disap­pear in 4~5min. Doctors need to check the situ­ations in which blood ows return after the rst injection and repeat an injection in 10~15min when necessary.
Fifth, it is recommended to dilute the hyal­uronidase of enough physiological saline before using it and massage the injected area after the injection of a hyaluronidase solution so that it will spread as evenly as possible and increase its contact surface with the ller. As mentioned in the section above, hyaluronidase cannot penetrate into ller particles due to its high molecular weight and can only work on particles directly touching it. As HA chains in contact with the solution are degraded and bro­ken into smaller units, the spaces become larger and work to expand the contact areas gradually. It is important to dilute hyaluroni­dase in enough amounts of physiological saline in order to inject a hyaluronidase solution evenly and expand the area of ller particles that are in contact with it as much as possible (Fig.2.59).
Sixth, when a ller mass becomes lumpy to form a lump or nodule, the affected areas will
Fig. 2.58 Inltration of hyaluronidase solution through the vessel wall
2.7 Basic Considerations fortheUse oftheHA Filler Degrading Enzyme Hyaluronidase
Fig. 2.59 The action mechanism of hyaluronidase acting on HA ller material
61
have poor blood circulation. Tissue reactions will become more severe in the collagen capsules enveloping the mass. The capsules on the outside become slightly thicker and form a biolm. In such a case, there will not be enough dissolution on the surface in contact with hyaluronidase, which eventually fails to penetrate the ller mass to dissolve the lump or nodule. When trying to dissolve piles of lumps or nodules in hard colla­gen capsules for certain, doctors need to inject a hyaluronidase solution into the HA ller mass as
much as possible so that hyaluronidase diluted in a saline can move in between the particles inside the mass rather than on the surface (Fig.2.60).
Finally, a hyaluronidase injection can cause allergic reactions related to allergies such as itch­iness and skin are. Doctors should always be prepared for these reactions when using hyal­uronidase. Some recommend a skin test before using hyaluronidase. It is a good decision to pre­pare antihistamine and steroid injections for the treatment of potential allergic reactions.
62
2 Types ofFillers andRheological Considerations forHA (Hyaluronic Acid) Fillers
Fig. 2.60 Two injection methods of hyaluronidase solution for HA ller mass

Further Reading

1. Tezel A, Fredrickson GH. The science of hyal­uronic acid dermal llers. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2008;10:35–42.
2. Park KY, Kim HK, Kim BJ. Comparative study of hyaluronic acid llers by invitro and invivo testing. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28(5):565–8.
3. Flynn TC, etal. Comparative histology of intradermal implantation of mono and biphasic hyaluronic acid llers. Dermatol Surg. 2011;37(5):637–43.
4. Park S, etal. Investigation of the degradation- retarding effect caused by the low swelling capacity of a novel hyaluronic acid ller developed by solid-phase cross­linking technology. Ann Dermatol. 2014;26(3)
5. Pierre S, et al. Basics of dermal ller rheology. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41:S120–6.
6. Kablik J, et al. Comparative physical properties of hyaluronic acid dermal ller. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35:302–12.
7. Falcone SJ, etal. Cross-linked hyaluronic acid der­mal llers: a comparison of rheological properties. J Biomed Mater Res. 2008;87A:264–71.
8. Borrell M, etal. Lifting capacities of hyaluronic acid llers. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2011;13:21–7.
9. Stern R, etal. Hyaluronan catabolism: a new meta­bolic pathway. Eur J Cell Biol. 2004;83:317–25.
10. Kim JE, et al. Hyaluronic acid llers: history and overview. Facial Plast Surg. 2011;27:523–8.
11. Åke Öhrlund J, Edsman KLM. The myth of the “biphasic” hyaluronic acid ller. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41(Suppl 1):S358–64.
12. Rhee DY, etal. Efcacy and safety of a new monopha­sic hyaluronic acid ller in the correction of nasola­bial folds: a randomized, evaluator-blinded, split-face study. J Dermatolog Treat. 2014;25(5):448–52.
13. Kopera D, et al. An open-label uncontrolled, mul­ticenter study for the evaluation of the efcacy and safety of the dermal ller Princess VOLUME in the treatment of nasolabial folds. Biomed Res Int. 2015:195328.
14. Philipp-Dormston WG, et al. Evaluating perceived naturalness of facial expression after llers to the naso­labial folds and lower face with standardized video and photography. Dermatol Surg. 2018;44(6):826–32.
15. Ramos-e-Silva M, et al. STYLAGE: a range of hyaluronic acid dermal llers containing mannitol. Physical properties and review of the literature. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2013;6:257–61.
16. Sundaram H, et al. Biophysical characteristics of hyaluronic acid soft-tissue llers and their rele­vance to aesthetic applications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:5S.
17. Kho I-S, Lee W.Filler complication. Springer; 2019. p.27–40.
Further Reading
63
18. Seungmin O, Kim B.Safe ller injection technique demonstration using live imaging tools. DAEHAN;
2017.
19. Edsman K, etal. gel properties of hyaluronic acid der­mal llers. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38:1170–9.
20. Yang B, etal. determination of modication degree in BDDE-modied hyaluronic acid hydrogel by SEC/ MS.Carbohydr Polym. 2015;131:233–9.
21. Pereira H, etal. Hyaluronic acid. Part of the advances in experimental medicine and biology book series. AEMB. 2018;1059:137–53.
22. Ascher B, et al. 12-Month follow-up, randomized comparison of effectiveness and safety of two hyal­uronic acid llers for treatment of severe nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg. 2017;43(3):389–95.
23. Philipp-Dormston WG, et al. Perceived naturalness of facial expression after hyaluronic acid ller injec­tion in nasolabial folds and lower face. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020;19(7):1600–6.
24. da Costa A, etal. Durability of three different types of hyaluronic acid llers in skin: are there differences among biphasic, monophasic monodensied, and monophasic polydensied products? Aesthetic Surg Jour. 2016;37(5):573–81.
25. Shu XZ, et al. In situ crosslinkable hyaluronan hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2004;25(7-8):1339–48.
26. Andre P, etal. Free radical scavenging properties of mannitol and its role as a constituent of hyaluronic acid llers: a literature review. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2016:27.
27. Wende FJ, etal. determination of substitution position in hyaluronic acid hydrogels using NMR and MS based methods. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;136:1348–57.
28. Hobar, etal. Porous hydroxyapatite granules for allo­plastic enhancement of the facial region. Clin Plast Surg. 2000;27:557–69.
29. Edsman KL, etal. Is there a method that can mea­sure cohesivity? Cohesion by sensory evaluation
compared with other test methods. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41:S365–72.
30. Lee W, etal. Clinical application of a new hyaluronic acid ller based on its rheological properties and the anatomical site of injection. Biomed Dermatol. 2018;2(1)
31. Keen MA.Hyaluronic acid in dermatology. SKINmed. 2017;15(6):441–8.
32. Stocks D, etal. Rheological evaluation of the physical properties of hyaluronic acid dermal llers. J Drugs Dermatol. 2011;10(9):974–80.
33. Rzany B, etal. An 18-month follow-up, randomized comparison of effectiveness and safety of two hyal­uronic acid llers for treatment of moderate nasola­bial folds. Dermatol Surg. 2017;43(1):58–65.
34. Glogau RG, Kane MAC. Effect of injection tech­niques on the rate of local adverse events in patients implanted with nonanimal hyaluronic acid gel dermal llers. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34(Suppl 1):S105–9.
35. Choi SC, etal. Modulation of biomechanical properties of hyaluronic acid hydrogels by crosslinking agents. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2015;103(9):3072–80.
36. De Boulle K, et al. A review of the metabolism of 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether-crosslinked hyaluronic acid dermal llers. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39(12):1758–66.
37. Guo X, et al. Bone resorption in mentum induced by unexpected soft-tissue ller. Aesthet Surg J. 2018;38(10):Np147–Np149.
38. Landau M, Fagien S. Science of hyaluronic acid beyond lling: broblasts and their response to the extracellular matrix. Plast Reconstruct Surg. 2015;136(5 Suppl):188s–95s.
39. Mochizuki M, etal. Evaluation of the invivo kinet­ics and biostimulatory effects of subcutaneously injected hyaluronic acid ller. Plast Reconstruct Surg. 2018;142(1):112–21.
Anatomical Considerations forFiller Procedures
3
3.1 Vessels andNerves
The face contains countless vessels, and it is practically impossible to inject llers without damaging the vessels at all. The reason why we should know the vessel structure and positioning relationship of the arteries is to avoid these com­plications which can lead to skin necrosis and visual complications. Figure3.1 shows the facial supraorbital and supratrochlear arteries which most likely to cause such complications. Of course, if the ller is injected into the supercial
a
b
temporal artery, it can reach the ophthalmic artery via the supraorbital or supratrochlear artery, both able to cause eventually visual complications.
The facial artery usually travels upward near the middle of the mandible lower margin and the anterior boundary of the masseter muscle. It is relatively safe to inject ller in the supercial fat layer around the jowl because the vessels are deeply located at the point they pass the mandib­ular bone (Fig. 3.1a, b). This upward-facing artery can be bent around the corners of the
Fig. 3.1 Arteries of the face
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2025 G. Hong et al., The Art and Science of Filler Injection,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-9215-6_3
65
66
Fig. 3.2 Vascular structures of the temple
Sentinel
(Zygomaticotem
poral) vein
Superficial layer
of
deep temporal
fascia (DTF)
Middle
temporal vein
3 Anatomical Considerations forFiller Procedures
Superficial
temporal fat
zygomatic arch
(Red pin)
pad
mouth and can be used to drive up and down the facial muscles. In addition, the ascending facial artery, traveling in and out of the nasolabial folds, produces several branches to the nose and lips. The soft tissue of the lip is soft enough that the pressure is low when the ller is injected, and the abundance of blood supply does not easily cause complications. However, in the case of the nose, the ller injected can increase the pressure in the surrounding tissue, since there is less space to place the ller. Moreover, since the diameter of the facial artery and its branches become nar­rower as they go up, these vessels can be blocked with less pressure, and the blockage is likely to cause local necrosis around the nose.
Although the facial artery sometimes does not extend the dorsal nasal artery branch as it ascends, the dorsal nasal artery and supraorbital artery from the facial artery is clinically important in causing visual complications by its connection to the ophthalmic artery. It is also important to know the depth at which the arteries are located in order to know which depth is safe to inject.
It is relatively safe to inject ller directly above the bone in the nasolabial area, as the angular artery runs between the subcutaneous and muscular layers. It can also be safer if the physician presses along the course of the artery distal to the injection site using the opposite hand ngers when doing the ller injection, which can prevent the ller from moving up the vessel.
When injecting ller near the eyebrow, one will encounter the supratrochlear artery and supraorbital artery, which originates deep inside the inner part of the orbital rim and rises to the supercial layer. The supratrochlear artery has mainly supercial branches, but the supraorbital artery usually divides into supercial branch and deep branch at a point 1 centimeter above the orbital rim. Unlike a nasolabial fold procedure, this artery produces a deep branch, so the deep layer injection is not necessarily safe. Therefore, pressing the superorbital part of the orbital rim with the opposite hand can prevent the movement of the ller.
Other vascular structures to be kept in mind are the transcanthal vein between the eyes, angu­lar vein located just below the tear trough, and the middle temporal vein which exists between the supercial and deep layers of the temporal fascia in the temple area (Fig. 3.2). Although visual complications via veins are an unusual event, there is an argument that the risk of vascu­lar complications through the vein may be a problem. However, it is impossible to perform the procedure without causing any vascular dam­age, so you should rst focus much more on avoiding the dangerous arteries and, if possible, then the venous structures.
We don’t need to be too concerned about the nerve structures during ller injection. This is because it is rare to have serious side effects such