Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_896_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
33 Мб
Скачать
8 Regeneration oftheSkin andPeripheral Nerves intheAdult
https://t.me/med1917
151
124. Hinz B, Pittet P, Smith-Clerc J, Chaponnier C, Meister J-J.Myobroblast development is characterized by specic cell­cell adherens junctions. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15(9):4310–20.
https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e04- 05- 0386.
125. Yannas IV. Models of organ regeneration processes induced by templates. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997;831:280–93. https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1749- 6632.1997.tb52203.x.
126. Knight CG, Morton LF, Peachey AR, Tuckwell DS, Farndale RW, Barnes MJ. The collagen-binding A-domains of integrins alpha(1)beta(1) and alpha(2)beta(1) recognize the same specic amino acid sequence, GFOGER, in native (triple-helical) colla-
gens. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(1):35–40. https://doi.org/10.1074/
jbc.275.1.35.
127. Yannas IV.Studies on the biological activity of the dermal regen­eration template. Wound Repair Regen. 1998;6(6):518–23. https://
doi.org/10.1046/j.1524- 475x.1998.60604.x.
128. Troxel K.Delay of skin wound contraction by porous collagen­GAG matrices. 1994.
129. Yannas IV, Burke JF, Gordon PL, Huang C, Rubenstein RH. Design of an articial skin. II. Control of chemical com­position. J Biomed Mater Res. 1980;14(2):107–32. https://doi.
org/10.1002/jbm.820140203.
Neuropeptides, Inflammation,
https://t.me/med1917
andDiabetic Wound Healing: Lessons fromExperimental Models andHuman Subjects
LucasMota, FrankW.LoGerfo, AristidisVeves, andLeenaPradhan-Nabzdyk
9
Abstract
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy and vascular disease, along with trauma, have long been recognized as major risk factors for the development of diabetic foot ulcer­ations (DFUs). More recently, chronic inammation, abnormal extracellular matrix remodeling, and reduced wound neovascularization, as a result of dysregulated cell function with imbalanced secretion of cytokines, matrix metalloproteinases, and growth factors, have been impli­cated in DFU failure to heal. Therefore, researchers are now focusing their efforts on understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms of diabetes-associated impaired wound healing, in an attempt to identify new targets and novel potential therapeutic approaches for DFUs, which remain a serious unmet clinical need. Recent advances in technologies such as single-cell sequencing are being implemented to further understand the pathology underlying DFU and design precise thera­peutics. A growing body of evidence suggests an impor­tant role of neuropeptides in skin repair, particularly in
L. Mota Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA e-mail: lsouzamo@bidmc.harvard.edu
F. W. LoGerfo Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA e-mail: ogerfo@bidmc.harvard.edu
A. Veves The Rongxiang Xu, MD, Center for Regenerative Therapeutics, Joslin-Beth Israel Deaconess Foot Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA e-mail: aveves@bidmc.harvard.edu
L. Pradhan-Nabzdyk (*) Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA e-mail: lpradhan@bidmc.harvard.edu
diabetes, where neuropeptide levels are diminished. On the other hand, there is emerging interest in dissecting the mechanisms of dysregulated inammation, namely, the changes in immune cells, such as macrophages and mast cells (MCs), in diabetic wound healing. Studies using in vitro and in vivo models of diabetic wound healing have considerably improved our understanding of the healing process. However, the currently available models have major caveats and are not ideal to study chronic, complicated, and multifactorial wounds, such as DFUs. In this chapter we summarize the involvement of neuro­peptides and mast cells in diabetic wound healing, high­lighting the most recent ndings. We also discuss the benets and limitations of the current wound healing models, emphasizing the need for conrmation and/or validation in multiple models and/or tissue specimens from human subjects.
Neuropeptides andDiabetic Wound Healing
Peripheral neuropathy is the most common complication of diabetes, affecting approximately 50% of diabetics, and being associated with up to 85% of DFUs [1, 2]. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy is associated not only with loss of pain sensitivity, especially at the lower extremities, rendering dia­betic patients prone to disregard trauma in such areas, but also with reduced levels of neuropeptides [3]. Neuropeptides are secreted by the small nerve bers, both sensory and auto­nomic, as well as by dermal and epidermal cells [4, 5]. They not only relay information such as pain signals to the central nervous system but participate in the inammatory and pro­liferative phases of wound healing by binding to specic receptors that are found in various skin cells, including immune cells such as mast cells (MCs), as well as endothe­lial cells, broblasts, and keratinocytes [6]. In fact, neuro­peptides can regulate the release of numerous cytokines and growth factors that are pivotal for wound repair and imbal-
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024 A. Veves et al. (eds.), The Diabetic Foot, Contemporary Diabetes, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55715-6_9
153
154
https://t.me/med1917
L. Mota et al.
anced in diabetes, including IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, and VEGF [4]. As a result, there is growing interest in the poten­tial role of neuropeptides, namely, substance P (SP), neuro­peptide Y (NPY), neurotensin (NT), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), and alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone (α-MSH), in diabetic wound healing [35, 7]. As key players in the bidirectional neuro-immune/neuro-inammatory axis [4, 6], it is anticipated that neuropeptides are involved in the healing of DFUs, where loss of sensory nerves, ineffective immune and inammatory responses, and dysregulated inammation are present. While focusing mostly on sub­stance P (SP), our group has also investigated the roles of neuropeptide Y (NPY) and neurotensin (NT) in diabetic wound healing.
Substance P andDiabetic Wound Healing
Substance P (SP) is an 11-amino-acid peptide that belongs to the tachykinin neuropeptide family, encoded by the TAC1gene. SP is released by c-nociceptive bers in response to injury and exerts its actions by activating three primary types of neurokinin (NK) receptors—NK1R, NK2R, and NK3R, with NK1R being the predominant and with highest afnity, and is degraded by the enzyme neutral endopepti­dase (NEP).
For decades, reports have suggested and/or demonstrated that SP participates in acute noncomplicated wound healing. SP is known to cause vasodilation [8, 9], to stimulate prolifera- tion and migration of endothelial cells [10, 11], broblasts [1214], and keratinocytes [15], as well as to recruit and acti­vate immune cells, particularly playing a crucial role in wound site inltration of polymorphonuclear leukocytes [1619]. Besides its trophic and chemoattractant effects, SP has also proven to be pro-angiogenic invitro and invivo [2022]. SP has been also recently implicated in the mobilization of endo­thelial progenitor cells, accelerating wound healing via improved angiogenesis [23, 24]. Based on such properties, and on the fact that SP is promptly released following cutane­ous injury, it was predicted to improve wound healing. In fact, SP treatment was shown to ameliorate acute wound healing in rodents [25]. Of interest, studies have reported reduced SP expression in skin biopsies from diabetic subjects [26]. Therefore, emerging studies are starting to explore the involve­ment of SP in healing of diabetic wounds—in diabetic corneal wounds [27, 28], where epithelial cells are the major effectors, and also in diabetic cutaneous wounds [5, 29], which involve a complex interplay between dermal and epidermal cells, and are characterized by a chronic inammatory and highly pro­teolytic environment.
Studies by our group have shown reduced gene and pro­tein expression of SP, as well as reduced gene expression of the main SP receptor—neurokinin-1 receptor (NK1R)—in the unwounded skin of diabetic rabbits when compared to their nondiabetic counterparts [3032]. This reduced SP skin expression was accompanied by a local chronic inamma­tory state, indicated by an increased baseline pro­inammatory cytokine expression without further increase in response to wounding, and resulted in delayed wound clo­sure [5].
In acute noncomplicated healing, M1-activated macro­phages are predominant during the inammatory phase, as they initiate an acute inammatory response to injury, while during the proliferative phase M2 macrophages take over to promote angiogenesis and granulation tissue formation [31,
3335]. However, diabetic rabbits showed an elevated base-
line skin M1/M2 macrophage ratio that persisted until the later stages of wound healing (10days post-wounding), sug­gesting a chronic pro-inammatory environment.
In agreement with our diabetic rabbit ear model ndings, we have shown reduced SP expression and increased NEP expression in the skin of diabetic mice (Fig. 9.1) [19]. Importantly, in diabetic human subjects, the circulating lev­els of SP were reduced, the SP skin gene expression of SP was reduced, and both the skin gene and protein expression of NEP were increased when compared to healthy control subjects, suggesting that SP bioavailability is severely decreased in diabetes. In addition, skin gene expression of the SP receptor NK1R was reduced in diabetes. Similarly, to the diabetic rabbit, the diabetic murine wound healing model was characterized by increased pro-inammatory cytokine expression and elevated M1/M2 macrophage ratio at base­line, lack of a robust acute inammatory response at the ear­lier stages of healing (day 3 post-wounding), and defective inammation resolution at the later stages (day 10 post­wounding), with failure to switch from the pro-inammatory M1 to the pro-regenerative M2 phenotype and delayed wound closure. Moreover, genetically modied mice de­cient in SP and related tachykinins (TAC1KO mice) or in the SP receptor NK1R (NK1RKO mice) also had delayed wound closure compared to their wild-type (WT) controls and pre­sented chronic low-grade inammation, with elevated base­line skin expression of pro-inammatory markers and elevated M1/M2 ratio, similar to the diabetic animals.
Of note, the presence of diabetes did not further delay wound healing in NK1R-decient (NK1RKO) mice [19]. Furthermore, using the rabbit sham/ischemic/neuroischemic ear model, our group has shown that diabetes impairs wound healing in both sham and ischemic conditions, but does not have an additional negative impact on the healing of neu-
a
c
9 Neuropeptides, Inammation, andDiabetic Wound Healing: Lessons fromExperimental Models andHuman Subjects
https://t.me/med1917
bd e
155
Fig. 9.1 Substance P (SP) skin expression is reduced, and neutral endopeptidase (NEP) skin expression is increased in diabetic mice. (a) Skin gene expression of SP was reduced in wild-type mice with diabe­tes mellitus (WT DM) compared to their nondiabetic wild-type controls (WT). (b) Skin gene expression of NEP was decreased in WT DM mice, as well as in neurokinin 1 receptor knockout (NK1RKO) and knockout (TAC1KO) mice at baseline (Day 0, d0). (c) Representative images of NEP staining in the baseline (d0) skin from WT non-DM and WT DM mice. DM mice have a higher NEP intensity in the epidermis (red arrows) and a higher number of NEP-positive cells in dermis
roischemic wounds. Together, these results suggest loss of neuropeptide (in particular SP) function as an important component of diabetes-associated impaired wound healing. Interestingly, neuroischemic wounds, which showed the most delayed healing, had the highest baseline skin macro­phage inltration and the highest wound M1/M2 ratio at later stages of healing (day 10 post-wounding) [31].
Importantly, we have demonstrated that topical applica­tion of SP to the wounds of both diabetic mouse dorsum and diabetic neuroischemic rabbit ear accelerates closure and ameliorates healing (Fig. 9.2) [19]. SP topical treatment induced the expression of pro-inammatory cytokines, such as MCP-1, IL-6, and KC (mouse homolog of human IL-8), as well as increased M1 macrophages during the early stages (inammatory phase) of healing, whereas it reduced pro-
(black arrows) compared with WT non-DM mice at day 0. Scale bar: 100μm. NEP staining intensity was increased in the (d) epidermis and (e) dermis of WT DM mice at baseline (d0). In WT non-DM mice, NEP intensity increased at day 3 post-wounding but returned to baseline lev­els by day 10, whereas in WT DM mice, it remained elevated through­out the healing process. Data represent the mean±SEM. *p<0.05. Copyright© Elsevier. Adapted from Leal, Carvalho, Tellechea et al., Substance P promotes wound healing in diabetes by modulating inam­mation and macrophage phenotype, American Journal of Pathology 2015 Jun;185 (6):1638–48 with permission from Elsevier
inammatory cytokine expression and polarized macro­phages to the M2 phenotype during the later stages, therefore allowing inammation resolution and progression to the pro­liferative phase (Fig.9.3). Topical SP has also been subse­quently shown to also improve wound healing in murine models through stimulating the proliferation and migrations of dermal broblasts and epidermal keratinocytes, substan­tially improving healing times in these models [3638].
In agreement with human studies that showed increased MMP-9 levels in the skin of diabetic subjects [39], as well as in diabetic and other chronic wounds [4042], MMP-9 expression was increased in both unwounded skin and wounds of our mouse model of diabetic wound healing [19]. Of interest, TAC1KO and NK1RKO mice also presented increased baseline skin MMP-9 expression, whereas topical
156
https://t.me/med1917
ab
cd
L. Mota et al.
Fig. 9.2 Substance P (SP) topical treatment accelerates wound healing in mouse and rabbit models of diabetes. (a) Representative images of mouse dorsal skin wounds at baseline (day 0) and day 10 of wild-type nondiabetic (WT), WT diabetic (WT DM), and WT diabetic SP-treated wounds (WT DM+ SP). (b) WT DM mice showed delayed healing compared to WT non-DM mice. Topical SP accelerated wound closure in both WT and WT DM mice. Data represent mean±SEM.*p<0.05, compared to WT. †p<0.05, compared to DM. (c) Representative image of the neuroischemic rabbit ear wounds at day 0. 1: untreated; 2:
SP treatment reduced MMP-9 expression post-wounding in diabetic mice. This suggests that loss of SP function may contribute to chronic elevated expression of MMP-9in dia­betic skin and wounds, which is associated with impaired healing [43], and that SP treatment may attenuate it.
More recently, other researchers have studied the effect of
systemically administered SP on cutaneous wound healing
vehicle- treated; 3: SP-treated; NI: neuroischemia. (d) Topical SP improved wound healing in a DM NI rabbit wound healing model. Data represent mean±SEM. **p<0.01 compared to untreated and vehicle­treated wounds. Copyright© Elsevier. Adapted from Leal, Carvalho, Tellechea etal., Substance P promotes wound healing in diabetes by modulating inammation and macrophage phenotype, American Journal of Pathology 2015 Jun;185 (6):1638–48 with permission from Elsevier
in diabetic mice. As expected, their results conrmed that SP accelerates diabetic wound closure and prevents the pro­longed inammatory response to injury [44, 45]. Interestingly, the effects of systemic SP observed in the serum of the dia­betic mice were similar to the ones of topical SP in the wound tissue at the later stages of healing, namely, elevated M2 monocytes in the peripheral blood mononuclear cell popula-
ab
9 Neuropeptides, Inammation, andDiabetic Wound Healing: Lessons fromExperimental Models andHuman Subjects
https://t.me/med1917
c
157
Fig. 9.3 SP modulates skin macrophage phenotype during healing. (a) Representative images of M1 and M2 macrophages in wild-type non­diabetic (WT non-DM) and diabetic (WT DM) mouse skin. Scale bar: 100μm. M1 (upper panel) and M2 (lower panel) are denoted by the yellow-orange stain resulting from triple-positive stain with CD68, TNFα and DAPI (for M1) or CD68, CD206 (for M2), and DAPI. (b) M1/M2 ratio was higher in DM at day 0 (d0). In non-DM mice, M1/M2 peaked at day 3 (d3) and returned to baseline levels at day 10 (d10), while it was persistently elevated in DM mice. SP increased M1/M2 at d3 and reduced it at d10. (c) MCP-1 skin gene expression peaked at d3
tion/elevated M2 macrophages in the wound margins, and reduced TNF-α circulating levels/reduced TNF-α wound expression, respectively. Additionally, it appears that SP also has a role in regulating adiponectin and fatty acid levels, demonstrating that it not only plays a role as an anti­inammatory peptide attenuating certain diabetic complications, but it may have a direct role in pathophysiol­ogy of insulin resistance itself (Fig.9.4) [45].
The ability of SP to induce the switch from M1 to M2 macrophages has also recently been conrmed invitro [46,
47]. Of note, SP treatment promoted macrophage M2 polar-
ization and release of pro-inammatory factors via activation of the NF-κB pathway in a co-culture model of broblasts and resting macrophages [46], whereas it suppressed NF-κB activation and reduced the production of pro-inammatory cytokines and enzymes in LPS-stimulated murine macro-
and returned to pre-wounding levels at d10in WT non-DM mice, but not remained elevated at d10in DM mice. In both WT non-DM and DM mice, SP treatment further increased MCP-1 at d3 and reduced it at d10. Data represent mean±SEM. *p<0.05; †p<0.05 compared to WT non-DM d0. Copyright© Elsevier. Adapted from Leal, Carvalho, Tellechea etal., Substance P promotes wound healing in diabetes by modulating inammation and macrophage phenotype, American Journal of Pathology 2015 Jun;185 (6):1638–48 with permission from Elsevier
phages [47], again suggesting that it may act as pro- or anti­inammatory depending on the environment/experimental conditions.
In summary, SP acts as a modulator of the inammatory response to injury and may be particularly important in the treatment of diabetic cutaneous wounds, where it appears to convert the chronic low-grade inammation into an early acute inammatory response followed by inammation reso­lution with progression to the proliferative phase of healing. NEP inhibitors have been suggested as a potential treatment for DFUs, but their serious adverse effects, such as angio­edema, impede its use [48, 49]. Alternatively, local delivery of SP via biomaterials that gradually release SP [38, 50], protect­ing it from rapid degradation, or topical treatment with more resistant SP analogs, have the potential to promote wound healing in diabetes, without major off-target effects expected.
158
a
b
cd
ef
Free fatty acid (FFA, mEq/L)
Leptin (pg/ml)
Time of SP injection
aline
OLETF+SP+At
https://t.me/med1917
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
Blood glucose (mg/dl)
100
50
0
0306090120
Time post injection of glucose (2g/kg)
LETO+Saline
LETO+SP
OLETF+Saline
OLETF+SP
OLETF+SP+At
120
100
80
60
T.CHO (mg/dl)
40
20
0
2wks
Time of SP injection
L. Mota et al.
LETO+Saline
LETO+SP
OLETF+Saline
OLETF+SP
OLETF+SP+At
4wks
1400
200
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
2wks
Time of SP injection
4wks
4500
4000
3500 3000
2500
2000 1500 1000
500
0
2wks 4wks
150
100
Triglyceride (mg/l)
50
0
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
Adiponectin (mg/ml)
1000
0
2wks
Time of SP injection
2wks 4wks
4wks
LETO+Saline
LETO+SP
OLETF+Saline
OLETF+SP
OLETF+SP+At
LETO+Saline
LETO+SP
OLETF+S
OLETF+SP
Time of SP injection
N=10/group. Adapted from Baek SM, Kim K, Kim S, Son Y, etal., SP prevents T2DM complications by immunomodulation. Sci Rep. 2020;10 (1):16753. Open Access. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/
by/4.0/. Theocharidis G, Thomas BE, Sarkar D, etal. Single cell tran-
scriptomic landscape of diabetic foot ulcers. Nature Communications. 2022 Jan;13 (1):181. Need this gure from Veves, OPEN ACCESS—
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Fig. 9.4 Substance P restores impaired glucose regulation by modulat­ing serum obese/insulin resistance-related markers. Substance P (SP) was injected into LETO or OLETF rats from postnatal 27weeks for 4weeks; (a) results of the glucose tolerance test (GTT) in LETO and OLETF rats at postnatal 31 weeks were evaluated. (b–f) Serum bio­chemical and growth factors were quantied at 2 and 4weeks post SP injection; p-values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically sig­nicant (*p<0.05, **p <0.01, ***p<0.001). At: NK-1R antagonist.
Neuropeptide Y andDiabetic Wound Healing
binding to its G-protein-coupled receptors—Y1, Y2, Y4, Y5, and y6—and is widely distributed through the central
The 36-amino-acid peptide neuropeptide Y (NPY) belongs to the pancreatic polypeptide family and is one of the most abundant neuropeptides in mammals [4]. NPY acts by
and peripheral nervous system but can also be found in other tissues, including the gastrointestinal tract and the skin [5153].
9 Neuropeptides, Inammation, andDiabetic Wound Healing: Lessons fromExperimental Models andHuman Subjects
https://t.me/med1917
159
Most studies on NPY are related to its neuroendocrine
effects on the central nervous system, where NPY acts as a potent orexigenic peptide regulating appetite, energy metab­olism, and body weight [54]. However, there is evidence that NPY also inuences metabolic functions in peripheral tis­sues. NPY was shown to suppress lipolysis and promote adi­pogenesis [55, 56], suggesting benecial effects on lipid uptake and storage in adipose tissue. Accordingly, mice de­cient in NPY or in its Y1 receptors developed insulin resis­tance and adipose tissue inammation following high-fat diet feeding [57, 58]. Another study conrmed that NPY modulates obesity-induced inammation, as loss of NPY expression from hematopoietic cells increased the number of adipose tissue macrophages and NPY receptor blockade induced dendritic cell maturation and secretion of IL-6 and TNFα [59]. Nonetheless, in a model of combined chronic stress and diet-induced obesity, the expression of NPY and Y2 receptor were associated with insulin resistance and increased numbers of adipose tissue macrophages [60, 61].
Similar to obesity, diabetes affects NPY levels, distribu-
tion, and action in a complex fashion. Whereas elevated plasma circulating levels of NPY have been associated with type 2 diabetes [62, 63], and NPY has also been identied as a minor autoantigen in type 1 diabetes [64, 65], the skin expression of this neuropeptide is reduced in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes [66, 67].
NPY has been reported to participate in angiogenesis as well
as in inammatory and immune responses both in vitro and invivo. Namely, NPY induces proliferation, migration, and tube formation of endothelial cells [68]; promotes angiogenesis [69
71]; and regulates immune responses including leukocyte traf-
cking, macrophage function, phagocytosis, cytokine release from macrophages and helper T cells, antigen presentation and antibody production, and activation of natural killer cells [72
75], all of which are important in wound healing. The effects of
NPY on immune cells are complex, and, similarly to SP, NPY can induce either pro- or anti-inammatory activities. For exam­ple, NPY stimulated macrophage function in adult mice, but suppressed the chemotactic and phagocytosis capacity of mac­rophages from aged mice [76, 77]. Likewise, NPY induced nitric oxide (NO) release from LPS-stimulated peritoneal mac­rophages in young rats, but not from their older counterparts [78]. Such ndings suggest that NPY may potentiate acute inammatory responses while protecting against inammation in chronic inammatory conditions.
The role of NPY in healing has been mostly studied in
ligament and tendon rupture [7981], vascular remodeling [8284], and ischemic tissue regeneration [85, 86] and more recently been shown to affect migration and angiogenesis potential of human adipose-derived stromal cells in chronic wounds [87]. Researches have also begun to explore its
involvement in cutaneous wound healing, through focusing on its pro-angiogenic receptors (NPY-2R and NPY-5R). Namely, mice decient in the Y2 receptor have delayed wound healing and reduced skin neovascularization [88]. Studies by our group have shown that, similarly to SP, the gene and protein expression of NPY is dysregulated in the diabetic rabbit ear model [30, 31]. In particular, baseline NPY skin protein expression was reduced in the diabetic ani­mals, while its gene expression was reduced post-injury. In addition, compared to their nondiabetic counterparts, NPY gene expression was lower in diabetic ischemic and diabetic neuroischemic wounds [31]. Interestingly, no differences were observed in the gene expression of receptors Y2 and Y5, which are known for their pro-angiogenic effects. The above ndings suggest that NPY participates in the healing of diabetic wounds. Additionally, some studies suggest that it may be involved in neurogenesis and also play a role in the pathophysiology of peripheral neuropathy itself, making it a particularly interesting target in the management of DFU [8991]. However, further investigation is needed to unravel the mechanistic pathways involved.
Neurotensin andDiabetic Wound Healing
Neurotensin (NT) is a 13-amino-acid bioactive peptide pri­marily distributed in the central nervous system and in the gastrointestinal tract [92, 93]. NT mediates its functions through the binding to two G-protein-coupled receptors— neurotensin receptor 1 (NTR1), high-afnity and most pre­dominant, and neurotensin receptor 2 (NTR2), low-afnity receptor—and/or to an intracellular type I receptor, neuro­tensin receptor 3 (NTR3) [94].
NT displays pro-inammatory properties by stimulating vasodilation, vascular permeability, immune cell migration, and phagocytosis [9597]. In addition, NT was able to induce IL-8 expression via NF-ƙB and ERK pathways in human colonocytes [98] and has been implicated in the pathophysi­ology of acute colonic inammation and intestinal angiogen­esis [99101]. However, NT also demonstrates protective effects in inammatory conditions, as shown by its ability to modulate intestinal inammation and stimulate healing fol­lowing experimentally induced colitis [102, 103]. Together, these ndings suggest an important immunomodulatory role for this neuropeptide. Moreover, NT was found to promote migration of microglial cells in an invitro cerebral wound healing model [104]. Furthermore, the proliferative effects of NT have been shown in both normal and malignant cells.
Most NT studies have focused on the central nervous sys­tem or gastrointestinal tract, and little is known about NT signaling in diabetes, particularly in diabetic skin and/or
160
https://t.me/med1917
L. Mota et al.
wounds. Interestingly, studies have suggested a role for NT in the development of diabetes. Fasting plasma levels of pro­neurotensin were associated with increased risk of diabetes incidence in human subjects [105] and were also elevated in both obese and insulin-resistant subjects [106]. In addition, increased levels of NT were observed in the pancreas of obese (ob/ob) mice and in the intestine of both ob/ob and diabetic (db/db) mice and correlated with insulin deciency [107, 108]. However, other studies reported no differences in NT levels between nondiabetic, diabetic lean, and diabetic obese subjects or between obese type 2 diabetic mice and their respective lean controls [109, 110].
Recent studies have demonstrated that while inducing inammation under homeostatic conditions, NT downregu­lates the inammatory responses of skin dendritic cells, mac­rophages, T cells, and broblasts when cells are previously exposed to pro-inammatory and/or hyperglycemic condi­tions [111113]. Such ndings highlight the role of NT as an immune and inammatory modulator, particularly through its role in downregulating inammatory pathways such as Janus kinase (JNK) and nuclear factor kappa beta (NF-kB). In addi­tion, NT treatment of cells previously exposed to LPS yielded different results than pre-treatment with NT followed by LPS treatment [111], suggesting that timely release of endogenous NT is crucial for proper wound healing responses. Of interest, hyperglycemic conditions reduced the expression of endoge­nous NT and its cell surface receptors NTR1 and NTR2in mouse macrophages, and this was associated with a reduction in macrophage migratory capacity, whereas NT treatment was able to partially reverse the hyperglycemia-induced impaired cell migration [112]. In addition, hyperglycemia signicantly reduced NT and NTR expression in a human keratinocyte cell line [114]. Recently treatment of keratino­cytes and T cells with NT has also been shown to enhance cell migration and reduce expression of inammatory markers such as TNF-a and IL-18 [115]. Together these results sug­gest that NT may not only work through direct effect on kera­tinocytes but also via paracrine and/or autocrine effects on macrophages, dendritic cells, and broblasts.
More importantly, invivo studies have shown that when topically applied to diabetic (and/or nondiabetic) mouse wounds, chitosan-, collagen-, and alginate-based biomateri­als and other biodegradable nanobers delivering NT, either alone or in combination with SP, signicantly accelerate healing [50, 116119]. Similar to SP treatment, NT treat­ment induced the expression of pro-inammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-6, and KC (mouse homolog of human IL-8) in day 3 wounds of diabetic mice, while reducing it at day 10 post-wounding. In addition, NT treatment reduced MMP-9 gene and protein expression in the diabetic mouse wounds at
the later stages of healing, and this was associated with an increase in broblast migration, as well as with an increase in the expression and deposition of collagen [116, 117].
In summary, NT improves diabetic wound healing via suppression of the prolonged and uncontrolled inammatory response, and subsequent induction of the proliferative phase of healing. This seems to be achieved by regulating the timely expression of pro-inammatory cytokines, stimulat­ing broblast migration, and modulating extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, all of which are compromised in dia­betic wounds and required for proper healing.
Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide andDiabetic Wound Healing
Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a 37-amino-acid neuropeptide widely distributed in the central and peripheral nervous systems and also present in non-neuronal tissues. The receptors for CGRP and related peptides are calcitonin receptor-like receptors (CLR) linked to an essential receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP), which is required for full functionality. In the peripheral nervous system, CGRP is co-localized with SP and released from capsaicin-sensitive peripheral afferent neurons and therefore is implicated in pain signaling. The relationship between SP and CGRP appears to be synergistic for vasodilation of human skin, with the co-application having a dose-dependent relationship with long-lasting vasodilation [120]. In addition of being one of the most potent peripheral microvascular vasodilators, CGRP has also been shown to have cardioprotective effects [121123].
Most studies involving diabetes and CGRP focus on the cardiovascular system. Diabetes was found to reduce the expression of CGRP and its receptors in rodents and to reduce CGRP-mediated vasodilation in rats [124131]. In addition, CGRP circulating levels were reduced in human subjects with diabetes and cardiovascular disease [132]. In support of such ndings, CGRP gene transfer was shown to have protective effects in a diabetic mouse model of ischemic- reperfusion injury [133] and play a modulatory role decreasing autophagy in mice cardiac tissue [134]. However, studies have also shown that CGRP may play an important role in the pathophysiology of diabetes, particu­larly type 2. A study in human obese nondiabetic subjects detected a modest increase in CGRP levels compared to lean controls [135], and a similar increase was also observed in pre-obese Zucker rats [136]. Additionally, mice decient in αCGRP are protected against diet-induced obesity, show improved glucose tolerance and increased insulin sensitivity
9 Neuropeptides, Inammation, andDiabetic Wound Healing: Lessons fromExperimental Models andHuman Subjects
https://t.me/med1917
161
[137]. Monoclonal therapy against CGRP has also shown to improve glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity, reduce adi­posity, and assist in weight loss, suggesting that CGRP inhi­bition may prove benecial in the treatment of obesity and insulin resistance. The impact of diabetes on CGRP and the role of CGRP in diabetes is complex and requires further investigation. Nonetheless, it is known that CGRP has an important role in peripheral nerve regeneration, and the loss of CGRP-containing sensory nerves has been implicated in the pathophysiology of diabetic peripheral neuropathy [138141].
CGRP is released in the skin from sensory afferents and can also be secreted by keratinocytes and immune cells, including monocytes/macrophages, and Langerhans cells [6]. There is evidence that CGRP participates in wound heal­ing, as CGRP administration increased blood ow and ap survival in a rat skin-ap model [142], and accelerated heal­ing in a blister model of the rat hind footpad [143], whereas deciency in CGRP, deciency in CGRP receptors, or phar­macological antagonism of CGRP-impaired wound healing [144147]. In a study, vacuum-assisted treated wounds in a diabetic mice demonstrated a signicant increase in dermal and epidermal bers, CGRP, and nerve growth factor expres­sion [148]. The benecial effects of CGRP in wound healing are likely related to vasodilation, induction of VEGF release triggering the cAMP pathway, and angiogenesis [143, 147,
149, 150]. In addition, CGRP promoted wound healing of
human bronchial epithelial cells by stimulating cell survival, proliferation, and migration via activation of PKC and MAPK pathways [151]. The role of CGRP in inammation and immunity is also complex, as it may increase the ow of immune and inammatory cells to the site of injury follow­ing vasodilation and stimulate pro-inammatory cytokine release, or suppress pro-inammatory-mediator release via cAMP [145]. Namely, whereas CGRP can increase the release of pro-inammatory cytokines including IL-1, IL-8, IL-6, and TNF-α [152155], as well as stimulate macro­phage phagocytic activity [156], it also has the ability to inhibit lymphocyte differentiation, proliferation, and IL-2 production [157159]; modulate Langerhans cell antigen­presenting function [160]; suppress pro-inammatory Th1; and induce regulatory Th2 responses [161]. Interestingly, recent studies suggest that CGRP induces a regulatory phe­notype in TLR4-stimulated macrophages and inhibits T-cell proliferation [162, 163].
Together, these ndings clearly indicate a role for CGRP as an immunomodulator and inammation regulator. Although the properties of CGRP suggest a potential candi­date for the treatment of diabetic wounds, the knowledge on this subject remains very limited, and new studies are needed to test this hypothesis.
Alpha-Melanocyte-Stimulating Hormone andDiabetic Wound Healing
Alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH) is a tride­capeptide that belongs to the melanocortin family and derives from the melanocortin precursor pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC), which is mainly expressed in the pituitary gland but can be found in a variety of tissues, including signicant amounts in the human skin [164, 165]. Five melanocortin receptors (MC1-5R) have been identied to date and shown to be involved in the regulation of many physiological phe­nomena including skin pigmentation (MC1R), cortisol pro­duction (MC2R), food intake and energy metabolism (MC3R and MC4R), and temperature regulation (MC5R) [166172]. Various skin cell types, including melanocytes, keratino­cytes, broblasts, and endothelial cells, produce α-MSH and express melanocortin receptors [165, 173, 174]. Like α-MSH, the enzyme that catalyzes its degradation—prolyl­carboxypeptidase (PRCP)—is expressed in the central ner­vous system and in a variety of peripheral tissues, including the skin.
In diabetes, α-MSH appears to have protective effects. In particular, it reduces weight gain, adiposity, and hepatic fat accumulation while stimulating muscle glucose uptake and increasing energy expenditure in mouse models of obesity [175, 176], as well as protects retinal vascular endothelial cells against oxidative stress and apoptosis in a rat model of diabetes [177]. Of interest, studies have shown reduced expression of POMC in the hypothalamus and pituitary of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats [178, 179], increased plasma levels of the enzyme PRCP in obese and/or diabetic human subjects [180], and even suggested a role for α-MSH deciency in the development of type 2 diabetes [181].
α-MSH is also known for its protective effects in inam­matory conditions, including colitis, brain and pulmonary inammation, transplantation, and skin inammatory dis­eases such as urticaria and psoriasis [182192]. Its anti­inammatory properties are vast and target multiple cells such as lymphocytes, monocytes and macrophages, mast cells, endothelial cells, broblasts, and keratinocytes, where α-MSH inhibits the NF-ƙB pathway. Namely, α-MSH sup- presses proliferation of stimulated lymphocytes and modu­lates its activity, inducing a regulatory phenotype [193, 194]. In addition, α-MSH inhibits monocyte adhesion to the vascu­lar endothelium and reduces TNF-α release from LPS­stimulated human monocytes in culture, while increasing IL-10in both human peripheral blood monocytes and cul­tured monocytes [195197]. Of note, such effects were achieved with low doses (range of 10 also attenuates the expression of IFN-γ and nitic oxide in LPS-stimulated murine macrophages [198, 199] and reduces
10
to 10
17
M). α-MSH