Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_896_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
276
https://t.me/med1917
G. Theocharidis and J. Li
repair activity of keratinocytes [49]. Exosomes from human
umbilical cord blood can transfer miR-21-3p to promote the
regenerative abilities of broblasts and endothelial cells,
thereby accelerating wound healing [50]. Therefore, bloodderived EVs may be a potential therapeutic approach for
wound healing.
Engineered EVs forWound Healing
Applications
To optimize EV functionality and therapeutic impact, various approaches have been proposed, aiming to manipulate
their cargo or their surface protein expression. These engineering methods can be either focused on directly modifying
the EVs or indirectly altering the EV through manipulation
of the parental cell [51].
Ribonucleic Acid-Based Therapeutic Approach
Introduction tomRNA
Messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) functions as the transient intermediator between deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)
and proteins. These single-stranded RNAs transcribed from
the protein-coding regions in DNA can be further translated
to produce functional protein molecules. By the development of in vitro-transcribed (IVT) mRNA that was demonstrated in the late 1990s [52], the mRNA-based therapeutics
received considerable attention and numerous researches
have been investigated to optimize IVT mRNA transfection
efciency, instability, immunogenicity, and delivery [53].
One of the biggest advantages of mRNA-based therapeutic approach over plasmid DNA (pDNA)-based gene therapy
is the capability of expressing the therapeutic protein without
entering inside the nucleus of target cells. Theoretically, the
delivered gene of interest, mRNA, accesses the cytoplasm
and produces any desired protein/peptide through translation
and protein synthesis machinery in the transfected cell. Such
an undemanding transfection approach enhances transfection efciency, avoids the risks of genomic integration, and
lowers potential toxicity risks. More importantly, compared
to direct protein delivery, the mRNA delivered inside the
cells is able to trigger long-lasting protein expression due to
its continuous translation in targeted cells over the course of
hours or days. These advantages of mRNA provide great
therapeutic potential in a range of biomedical elds: vaccination [54–56], cancer immunotherapy [57], protein replacement [58], and genome editing [59, 60], and obviously
enable the rapid entry of mRNA therapeutics in treating diabetic foot ulcers. The mRNA encoding therapeutic proteins
can be employed as a direct strategy to supply missing pro-
tein, enhance downregulated endogenous protein, and procure functional foreign proteins to the ulcer area.
The development of mRNA therapeutics for treating DFU
is at the initial stage compared to their growth in cancer
immunotherapies and vaccines. This is mainly due to [1] the
challenges remaining in mRNA delivery systems: target
delivery and endosomal escape, and [2] ongoing discovery
of healing-associated genes that will have therapeutic potential. In this section, we briey overview representative
mRNA delivery methods, mRNA modication strategies,
and the potential and ongoing research on genes of interest in
managing chronic wounds and in diabetic lower extremity
complications.
mRNA Delivery Platforms
Messenger RNAs possess inherent limitations. They have difculty penetrating target cells and are easily degraded by
nucleases present in biological uids when used as a standalone drug. The use of naked mRNAs may result in inefcient
cellular uptake, low transfection rate, and immunogenicity.
Thus, most research has focused on establishing appropriate
delivery methods to improve the mRNA stability and optimize mRNA base modication to reduce immunogenicity.
One of the rst experiments using liposomes to deliver
exogenous mRNA into mouse lymphocytes dates back to
1978 [61]. The successful translation of mRNA encoding
rabbit globin introduced by liposome opened the door to
advancing in ionizable lipid and RNA entrapment techniques
[55, 58, 62]. Over decades, a variety of materials, mainly
lipids-based, have been formulated for mRNA delivery, such
as lipids, polymer derivatives, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs),
and lipid-like materials. Above all, LNPs have been extensively studied. As a well-established delivery vehicle, LNPs
rst received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
approval in 2018 for delivering small molecular: siRNA
[63]. By 2020, two authorized mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines validated the efciency of lipid nanoparticles in delivering base-modied antigen mRNA in humans. They are
BNT162b2 from Pzer-BioNTech and mRNA-1273 from
Moderna [64].
The properties of LNPs are primarily governed by the
chemistry of the lipids and components of other lipids.
Lipids are amphiphilic molecules that include a hydrophilic
polar head group and a hydrophobic tail [65–67]. Cationic
LNPs are the most widely used nonviral nucleic acid carriers, due to their permanent positively charged head group:
quaternary ammonium lipid. Not only do the positively
charged LNPs stabilize the entrapment of negatively charged
nucleic acid, but also electrostatically promote the adsorption of LNPs to negatively charged cell membranes and
facilitate higher cellular uptake rates. The successful release
of nucleic acid from their carriers into the cell cytoplasm

15 Role ofExtracellular Vesicles, Modied mRNA, miRNA, andsiRNA inDiabetic Lower Extremity Complications
https://t.me/med1917
277
Fig. 15.1 Schematic illustration of the delivery mechanism of exogenous messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA), small interfering ribonucleic
acid (siRNA), and micro ribonucleic acid (miRNA). In addition to
being entrapped inside nanoparticle carriers, both ligand-conjugated
naked siRNA and miRNA are small enough (~22 kDa) to be delivered
requires the cationic property from the LNP complexes. The
anionic lipids in the cell membrane help neutralize the positively charged cationic LNP, then lead to the disruption of
electrostatic interactions between the LNP and the nucleic
acids. This theory applies to ionizable lipids, another type of
lipids that have been studied and evaluated for mRNA delivery in vivo, as well [57, 58, 68]. Ionizable lipids are pHsensitive. They maintain a neutral charge at physiological
pH, but are protonated at low pH [69]. Therefore, the lipid
carriers become positively charged when trapped in endosomes where the pH is lower than the extracellular environment. The positively charged lipid complexes are able to
better foster endosomal escape by destabilizing the negatively charged cell membrane (Fig.15.1). Compared to cationic lipids, the ionizable lipids in extracellular uids have
less interaction with negatively charged red blood cells, and
provide an improved biocompatibility and lower toxicity to
LNPs [58]. Nevertheless, the quaternary ammonium contained in cationic lipid complexes displays immunostimulatory potency and is widely used as an immune adjuvant in
mRNA vaccines [57].
into the cell cytoplasm. However, for relatively large RNA molecules,
such as mRNA, lipid nanoparticles are required for delivery. Unlike
mRNA-based therapeutic approaches, which enhance protein expression, both siRNA and miRNA are employed for gene silencing (mRNA
cleavage) to suppress protein expression
To promote efcient protein expression and target cell
delivery efcacy, LNP-mRNA formulations commonly contain other helper lipids components in addition to cationic and
ionizable lipids, including cholesterol and polyethylene glycol
(PEG) lipids. Cholesterol is utilized to enhance and modulate
LNP stability, whereas the molar percentage and structure of
PEG lipids alters LNP sizes and surface charge, which is
determined by zeta potential. More importantly, the addition
of PEG lipids endows the ability to conjugate specic ligands
or antibody to the surface of LNPs for target delivery [68, 70].
In addition to PEG-linked ligands targeted delivery, scientists
recently developed a cell-specic targeting platform named
Anchored Secondary scFv Enabling Targeting (ASSET) to
coat LNPs with monoclonal antibodies specically binding to
the receptor present on the cell membrane to deliver siRNA or
mRNA.The ASSET platform successfully achieved a selective protein expression (IL-10) in a specic cell type
(Ly6c + leukocytes) in vivo and was explored for treating
inammatory bowel disease [71, 72]. The decoration of
ligands/antibodies on the surface of nanoparticles opens up the
opportunities for cell-selective targeting in chronic diseases

278
https://t.me/med1917
G. Theocharidis and J. Li
like diabetes. Opportunities to leverage mRNA-based therapeutics to target cell types that are associated with ECM
remodeling, angiogenesis, vascularization, and re-epithelialization are now emerging, including but not limited to, broblasts, macrophages, keratinocytes, and mast cells.
Structural Elements ofmRNA Molecules andtheir
Modications
The selection of materials for lipid carrier synthesis should
prioritize endosomal escape and target delivery, the two of
the major challenges that remain in mRNA-based therapeutics, considering that the surface of the lipids are the rst
layer of mRNA-LNP complexes cells can sense. To further
enhance translational efcacy, improve mRNA biological
activity, and reduce immunogenicity, modications on synthetic mRNA are required.
Similar to the natural mRNA in eukaryotic cells, the basic
structure of modied mRNA contains ve major structural
elements that start with the 5′ cap and end with the 3’poly (A)
tail, open reading frame (ORF, region encoding the protein of
interest) and 5′ and 3′ untranslated region (5’UTRs and 3’
UTRs) in between [56, 73, 74] (Fig.15.2a). Incorporation of
functional 5′ cap structure in synthetic mRNA allows binding
to eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (EIF4E) and protects mRNA from nuclease degradation by binding to mRNA
decapping enzymes. The most common 5′ cap consists of an
inverted 7-methylguanosine and has 5′-5′ triphosphate
(m7GpppN, Cap 0) that serves as a bridge in between to connect the rest of the mRNA complexes [75]. The length of the
3′ poly(A) tails has been found to affect the translation efciency. The protein expression levels are positively correlated
with the length of the 3′ poly (A) tails and an optimal length is
Fig. 15.2 Schematic illustration of lipid nanoparticle nucleic acid (LNP-mRNA/siRNA/miRNA) carrier structure (top) and intracellular trafcking of LNP complexes (bottom)

15 Role ofExtracellular Vesicles, Modied mRNA, miRNA, andsiRNA inDiabetic Lower Extremity Complications
https://t.me/med1917
279
considered ranging from 120A to 150A [56]. In addition, both
the translation efciency and half-life of synthetic mRNA are
regulated by the 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTR). A
highly structured 5’ UTR region is not recommended, since 5’
UTR is important for initiation of the translation; whereas 3’
UTRs are mostly derived from β-globin [73].
The delivered exogenous mRNA presents inherent immunostimulation and can be recognized as foreign mRNA by
intracellular sensors, due to their lack of the natural modied
nucleotides present in natural mRNA.Unmodied mRNAs
have been shown to signal through human toll-like receptors
(TLRs), including TLR3, TLR7, and TLR8, resulting in
upregulated type I interferon, TNF-α expression, and IL-12
expression [76]. To reduce immunogenicity, the following
nucleotides are commonly used to modify synthetic mRNA:
N [1]-methylpseudouridine (m [1]Ψ), pseudouridine (Ψ),
5-methylcytidine (5mC), N6-methyladenosine (m [6]A),
5-methyluridine (5meU), 5-methoxyuridine (5moU),
5-hydroxymethyl-cytidine (5hmC), or 2-thiouridine (S [2]U)
[77–80] (Fig.15.2b). Not only does the incorporation of the
modied nucleotides decrease innate immune activation, but
also enhances protein expression and protects mRNA from
RNAse degradation in physiological environments.
Moreover, research has shown a combination of modications is more benecial to replicate the modied nucleotides
in natural mRNA.The mRNA harboring both Ψ and 5mC
signicantly lowered the IFN-β and TNF-α expression in
macrophages [81]. The m [1]Ψ/5mC-modied mRNA
encoding FLuc displayed a higher luciferase activity than
those modied solely with m [1]Ψ or 5mC [79]. In addition
to m [1]Ψ/5mC modication combination, combinations of
5hmC/5meU and 5moC/5meU-modied FLuc mRNAs
exhibited superior luciferase activity compared to unmodied mRNA [78]. These ndings support the critical role of
chemical modications of mRNA in improving its stability
and prolonging transcription time.
Current Genes ofInterest inTreating DFU
During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, modied mRNA therapeutic applications in viral infection and vaccination gained
global attention. The investigation of mRNA-based therapeutics on how to treat DFU is also progressing. Many
researches have focused on identifying and targeting the
genes that are associated with diabetic/chronic wound
healing.
A signicant percentage of diabetic patients are suffering
from peripheral artery disease (PAD). Due to the vascular
dysfunction present in diabetic foot ulcers, peripheral ischemia in lower extremity is one of the major factors contributing to impaired wound healing [82]. Targeting genes that are
essential to angiogenesis and vascularization to promote
wound healing has been proposed as a promising strategy. In
particular, the most extensively studied mRNA-based therapeutic strategy in both preclinical animal models and human
clinical trials is vascular endothelial growth factor A
(VEGF-A) [83–89]. The Ψ/5mC-modied mRNA encoding
VEGF-A (165) was the rst developed for improving cardiac
function by regulating new blood vessel formation, stimulating endothelial proliferation [90, 91]. The modied VEGF-A
mRNA, known as AZD8601 [92], was the rst mRNA-based
therapeutics evaluated in patients with type 2 diabetes [86].
The therapeutic protein expression and effects of chemi-
cally modied VEGF-A
in wound healing were validated
165
in mouse and human studies. The intradermal injection of
AZD8601, formulated with Lipofectamine2000, in db/db
mice upregulated blood ow, promoted new vessel formation and blood oxygen supply, and accelerated reepithelization in a dose-dependent manner compared to the
wounds treated with recombinant human VEGF-A protein or
citrate/saline vehicle [89]. In 2019, naked chemically modied VEGF-A
(AZD8601) was rst evaluated in a human
165
study with intradermal injections on the forearm. The study
recruited 18–65years-old male volunteers with type 2 diabetes mellitus and included three different dosages of mRNA
ranging from 24ug to 360ug. At the mRNA-treated sites,
upregulated VEGF-A protein levels were observed at 4–24h
post-administration, and basal skin blood ow was enhanced
at 4h to 7days post-administration [86]. Nevertheless, the
increased local mRNA diffusivity can signicantly lower the
therapeutic performance due to the rapid degradation/loss of
mRNA at the wound injection sites [83, 84, 87]. Thus, the
delivery carrier for modied mRNA matters, as was earlier
discussed. An ionizable lipid nanoparticle vehicle composed
of ionizable lipid, PEG
, 1,2- distearoyl- sn- glycerol- choli
2000
ne 3-phosphate (DSPC), and cholesterol was developed for
the delivery of mRNA encoding VEGF-A protein and was
validated in both regular [84] and streptozotocin-induced
diabetic C57BL/6 mouse models [83]. The VEGF-A mRNALNP transfection efcacy and therapeutic protein expression
was profoundly upregulated when compared to naked
VEGF-A mRNA.Collagen deposition and vascular formation in VEGF-A mRNA-LNP-treated wounds were enhanced
~30% more than in naked mRNA-treated wounds [84].
The success of VEGF-A
(AZD8601) mRNA-based
165
therapeutic effects in diabetic wound healing is a major milestone and impelled the investigations of other genes of interest associated with healing in treating impaired wounds.
Growing evidence has shown the benecial impact of using
growth factors (cytokines and human recombinant protein),
such as VEGF, keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) [93, 94],
epidermal growth factor (EGF) [95, 96], basic broblasts
growth factors (bFGF) [96], and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) [97], on promoting impaired diabetic wound
healing. Potential mRNA candidates could include modied

280
https://t.me/med1917
G. Theocharidis and J. Li
bFGF, KFG, EGF mRNA, or any other genes that are proreparative to modulate either the inammation or/and proliferation stages in wound healing. Many genes of interest are
currently being investigated and require validation in appropriate diabetic preclinical models to determine their translatability to humans.
Intro toSmall Interfering RNA (siRNA)
Small interfering RNAs (siRNA)-based drug/treatment is
one other major class in RNA therapies that can manipulate
gene/protein expression. The main biochemical mechanism
of action of siRNA-based therapeutics currently under
research, clinical trials, or FDA approval is to mediate gene
silencing [72]. Unlike mRNA (~340–2300kDa), siRNAs are
smaller in size (~ 13kDa) with a double-stranded structure.
To sufciently suppress protein translation (gene knockdown), siRNA interferes with the mature mRNA; thus, the
a
siRNA sequence is designed specically to target mRNA
that encodes the undesired protein. After the siRNA is delivered into the cell cytoplasm, the endogenous RNA interference machinery of the cell is triggered. Then, RNA-induced
silencing complex (RISC) is recruited to load the antisense
strand from delivered siRNA to pair it to targeted complementary mRNAs. Once the target sequence is located and
paired, the mRNA is cleaved by the catalytic RISC protein,
Argonaute 2 (Ago2), resulting in reduced expression of the
protein-coding gene. Similar to mRNA delivery, siRNA only
requires cytoplasmic delivery. Besides synthetic delivery
carriers mentioned previously, siRNAs can also be solely
delivered by using a small conjugate or antibody due to their
smaller size; whereas, synthetic nanovehicles are required
for sufcient delivery of larger RNAs, such as mRNA
(Fig.15.3). Nevertheless, the most effective siRNA delivery
is achieved by using lipid nanoparticles as the carrier [98].
The rst siRNA-LNP based therapeutics was approved by
the FDA in 2018, known as Onpattro (treating polyneuropa-
b
Fig. 15.3 Basic structure of modied mRNA (a) and examples of chemically modied nucleobases (b) [58]. (Copyright 2021, American Chemical
Society)

15 Role ofExtracellular Vesicles, Modied mRNA, miRNA, andsiRNA inDiabetic Lower Extremity Complications
https://t.me/med1917
281
thies) [63]. One year later, delivering N-acetylgalactosamine
(GalNAc) conjugated siRNA to hepatocytes against aminolevulinate synthase 1 (ALAS1) was approved by the FDA
to treat porphyria attacks [99]. The convenient delivery
methods available has enabled the application of siRNA
drugs in numerous diseases [100, 101]. In recent years, the
investigation of siRNA has been thriving and showing great
potential in diabetic wound healing.
Current Genes Modulated forWound Healing
Acceleration
siPHD2
Enhancing the stability of hypoxia-inducible factor-α
(HIF-1α) via the siRNA mechanism to regulate cell behavior
and promote tissue formation has been studied for over
15years [102, 103]. This critical transcription factor is primarily involved in cellular responses, including cell viability,
motility, and adhesion, to lower O2 levels (Hypoxia) [104].
Oxygen is required for the normal function of most cells;
however, during the course of wound healing, hypoxia can
be benecial for the production of growth factors and cytokines that promote angiogenesis and tissue repair [105].
Studies have demonstrated that mice with constitutive
expression of the HIF-1α protein developed 66% more blood
vessels compared to mice without HIF-1α expression [106].
The overexpression of HIF-1α upregulated VEGF and FGF2
protein expression, and vascular density. Hyperglycemia has
been shown to negatively impact the hypoxic response, leading to less stabilization of HIF-1α in diabetic wound environments when compared to non-diabetic wounds. Berra etal.
reported that HIF prolyl-hydroxylases domain-2 (PHD2)
contributes to hydroxylate proline residues on HIF-1α in
normoxia. Silencing PHD2 via PHD2 siRNA was found to
sufciently improve the stability of HIF-1α in normoxia
[103]. Thus, targeting expression of HIF-1α via siRNAbased therapy would be benecial for promoting angiogenesis DFU healing.
Various delivery systems for PHD2 siRNA have been
validated in different animal models. Diabetic db/db mice
wounds treated by agarose matrix loaded PHD2 siRNA topically upregulated the protein levels of HIF-1α, mRNA levels
of VEGF and FGF-2, and vascular density compared to the
control group which was treated with nonsense siRNA [105].
To promote siRNA delivery efciency, Nelson etal. developed biodegradable scaffolds (polyester triol prepolymers)
loaded with siRNA-nanoparticles (di-block copolymer poly
[DMAEMA71-b-(BMA103-co-PAA68-co-DMAEMA57)]
self-assembled micellar) to achieve a sustained release of
siRNA and facilitate exosome escape. The scaffold-loaded
PHD2 siRNA-nanoparticle-treated balb/c mice wounds
demonstrated an increased number of vessels within scaffolds [107]. A similar PHD2 siRNA delivery method has
been validated on a diabetic rat model, resulting in elevated
α-SMA vessels and Col IV vessels in PHD2 siRNA-treated
wounds [108].
siMMP9
Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a family (24 different
MMPs in human) of zinc-dependent endopeptidases that are
overexpressed in many diseases, leading to physiological
and pathological disorders [109]. MMPs play critical roles in
the pathology of diabetic foot ulcers, the most common
forms of chronic wounds [110]. The persistence of elevated
levels of MMP-9 was detected in prolonged chronic cutaneous wounds where healing was signicantly impaired [111].
MMP-9 was found to be detrimental to tissue remodeling
and regeneration in the healing process due to its capability
of degrading various kinds of extracellular matrix. The study
of diabetic MMP-9 knockout mice provided further conrmation of the detrimental impact of MMP-9 on diabetic
wound pathology, as these mice were observed to have
impaired wound healing [110]. Thus, a siRNA-based therapeutic approach of targeting MMP-9 for the treatment of
DFU has been increasingly investigated.
One of the major challenges for gene therapy strategies is
to build an efcient and safe delivery platform. Due to the
anionic phosphate groups in the MMP-9-siRNA, cationic
polymers are often selected as the carriers for this
siRNA. Compared to naked MMP-9 siRNA, the
β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) core and poly (amidoamine) Dendron
arms (β-CD-[D3]7)/MMP-9-siRNA complexes promoted
wound healing in diabetic rats on Day 7 [112]. Repeated
administration of (β-CD-[D3]7)/MMP-9-siRNA, however,
may result in the accumulation of siMMP-9 in the liver,
which could cause thrombocytopenia or peripheral neuropathy. A controlled, sustained, and localized delivery system
for RNAi therapy is needed to maximize the MMP-9 siRNA
therapeutic effect in diabetic wound healing. Many research
labs have focused on using cationic polysaccharide derivatives, including chitosan, dextran, pectin, and pullulan, or a
hybrid hydrogel dressing to achieve controlled MMP-9
siRNA release [113–118]. Using electrostatic assembly, a
layer-by-layer (layer of siRNA lm and layer of chitosan)
self-assembled hydrogel incorporated with siRNA was able
to achieve localized delivery into wound beds with sustained
release. This approach resulted in a signicant reduction of
MMP-9 expression through sufcient knockdown [113].
Unlike linear cationic polymers, hyperbranched cationic
polysaccharide derivatives (HCP) have been found to be
effective as nonviral gene delivery vectors due to their compact and globular structures. Studies have demonstrated that
these vectors exhibit higher transfection efciency while
causing minimal cytotoxicity [119]. The ethylenediamine
(EDA)—or diethylenediamine (DETA)-modied glycogen
can form complexes with siMMP-9 with a diameter of 100-

282
https://t.me/med1917
G. Theocharidis and J. Li
Fig. 15.4 Schematic illustration of a supramolecular peptide hydrogel
doped with siRNA-loaded NPs for local siMMP-9 delivery in diabetic
wound healing. After administration of this siRNA delivery system to
the diabetic wound as dressing (a), the peptide hydrogel could signicantly prolong the retention of siRNA-loaded NPs at the wound tissues
200 nm. Particularly, EDA-modied glycogen siMMP-9
complex-treated diabetic rats’ wounds resulted in enhanced
wound healing by 20% higher wound closure rates compared
to pure EDA modied glycogen treated and control wounds
[114]. The most promising and appealing approach for delivering siRNA via a nanoplatform currently is the incorporation of siRNA-LNP into hydrogel substrates [118]. LNP is
used to protect siRNA from degradation and increase cellular uptake efciency, while hydrogel dressing facilitates the
sustained release of LNP (Fig.15.4). One recent study demonstrated that supramolecular peptide hydrogel incorporated
siMMP-9 loaded nanoparticles (cationic lipid-like compound) efciently silenced MMP-9 expression up to day 7
post-wounding, improved the rate of wound healing, and
enhanced the maturity of collagen in diabetic rats [118].
Other Potential siRNA inTreating DFU
There are other types of emerging siRNA that have demonstrated excellent results in regulating gene expression in
impaired diabetic animal wound models, including Keap1
and GM3S siRNA.While these siRNAs of interest have not
been heavily studied, the remarkable results they have
obtained are noteworthy.
Several studies have demonstrated that diabetic wounds
with hyperglycemia have elevated levels of reactive oxygen
species (ROS) compared to normoglycemic wounds, due to
the hyperglycemia-associated oxidative stress. Such an
(b). With the sustained release of siRNA-loaded NPs from the hydrogel
network (c), the keratinocytes could efciently internalize the loaded
siRNA (d), leading to signicant inhibition of MMP-9 expression (e)
and thereby effective diabetic wound healing [118]. (Copyright 2023,
Elsevier)
imbalanced ROS production may result in dysregulated
reduction-oxidation (redox) state in the wounds. Nuclear
factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) signaling pathway
plays a crucial role in regulating antioxidants and maintaining redox homeostasis by reducing the oxidative stress [120].
Upregulation of Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1
(Keap1) is observed in diabetes, which functions as a repressor of Nrf2 and leads to a high level of ROS accumulation.
Topical siKeap1 therapy can effectively restore Nrf2 signaling in diabetic mouse models, leading to a reduction in ROS
accumulation, and higher Nrf2 protein expression in the
wound area. The wound healing outcomes in db/db mice
were improved with increased granulation tissue, newly generated vessel counts, and reduced epithelial gap [120]. The
improved siKeap1 delivery efcacy was demonstrated using
lipoproteoplex nanoparticles composed of cationic lipid
nanoparticles and coiled-coil protein, or milk-derived exosomes as carriers [121, 122]. Both topical delivery systems
successfully restored Nrf2 antioxidant function, promoted
diabetic tissue regeneration, and enhanced collagen formation in db/db mice and STZ-induced diabetic mice models,
respectively [121, 122].
The overexpression of ganglioside-monosialic acid 3synthase (GM3S) in diabetic human plantar skin is known to
cause insulin resistance and impair wound healing. Randeria
etal. developed a spherical GM3S nucleic acids loaded gold
nanoparticle delivery system to knockdown GM3 synthase.

15 Role ofExtracellular Vesicles, Modied mRNA, miRNA, andsiRNA inDiabetic Lower Extremity Complications
https://t.me/med1917
283
In contrast to LNP nanoplatform, duplexed GM3S thiolated
siRNA were modied onto the surface of 13 nm gold
nanoparticles. Topically delivered spherical GM3S siRNA
accelerated the healing rate by promoting granulation tissue
area, vascularity, and most importantly, upregulating insulinlike growth factor (IGF1) and epidermal growth factor (EGF)
receptor phosphorylation in type 2 diabetic mice [123].
The siRNA-based treatment has exhibited great potential
in treating diabetic wounds, as it has the capability of targeting/silencing specic undesired mRNA expression. However,
there are still limitations and challenges, such as efcient
gene selection from databases, target delivery, endosomal
escape, and prolonged RNA stability. The future approach
for RNA-based therapeutic is a combination of appropriate
gene selection and their nano carriers (LNP), with the ultimate objective of maximizing the efcacy of RNA delivery.
Advanced RNA-based therapies have shown promising
results in treating diabetic wound healing and may become a
standard treatment option in the future. However, further
research and clinical trials are necessary to fully understand
their safety and efcacy before they can be widely adopted in
clinical settings.
References
1. van Niel G, D'Angelo G, Raposo G. Shedding light on the
cell biology of extracellular vesicles. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol.
2018;19:213–28. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2017.125.
2. Vader P, Mol EA, Pasterkamp G, Schiffelers RM. Extracellular
vesicles for drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;106:148–56.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2016.02.006.
3. Gurung S, Perocheau D, Touramanidou L, Baruteau J. The exosome journey: from biogenesis to uptake and intracellular signalling. Cell Commun Signal. 2021;19:47. https://doi.org/10.1186/
s12964- 021- 00730- 1.
4. Taylor J, Bebawy M.Proteins regulating microvesicle biogenesis
and multidrug resistance in cancer. Proteomics. 2019;19:e1800165.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201800165.
5. Xie S, Zhang Q, Jiang L. Current knowledge on exosome biogenesis, cargo-sorting mechanism and therapeutic implications.
Membranes (Basel). 2022;12(5):498. https://doi.org/10.3390/
membranes12050498.
6. Jahn R, Sudhof TC.Membrane fusion and exocytosis. Annu Rev
Biochem. 1999;68:863–911. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.
biochem.68.1.863.
7. Nabi IR, Le PU.Caveolae/raft-dependent endocytosis. J Cell Biol.
2003;161:673–7. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200302028.
8. Doherty GJ, McMahon HT.Mechanisms of endocytosis. Annu
Rev Biochem. 2009;78:857–902. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.
biochem.78.081307.110540.
9. van Dongen HM, Masoumi N, Witwer KW, Pegtel
DM. Extracellular vesicles exploit viral entry routes for cargo
delivery. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2016;80:369–86. https://doi.
org/10.1128/MMBR.00063- 15.
10. Gurtner GC, Werner S, Barrandon Y, Longaker MT. Wound
repair and regeneration. Nature. 2008;453:314–21. https://doi.
org/10.1038/nature07039.
11. Furie B, Furie BC.Mechanisms of thrombus formation. N Engl J
Med. 2008;359:938–49. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra0801082.
12. Koh TJ, DiPietro LA.Inammation and wound healing: the role
of the macrophage. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2011;13:e23. https://
doi.org/10.1017/S1462399411001943.
13. Eming SA, Krieg T, Davidson JM. Inammation in wound
repair: molecular and cellular mechanisms. J Invest Dermatol.
2007;127:514–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jid.5700701.
14. Velnar T, Bailey T, Smrkolj V. The wound healing process: an
overview of the cellular and molecular mechanisms. J Int Med Res.
2009;37:1528–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/147323000903700531.
15. Theocharidis G, Connelly JT.Minor collagens of the skin with
not so minor functions. J Anat. 2019;235:418–29. https://doi.
org/10.1111/joa.12584.
16. Baum CL, Arpey CJ. Normal cutaneous wound healing: clinical correlation with cellular and molecular events.
Dermatologic Surg. 2005;31:674-686; discussion 686. https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1524- 4725.2005.31612.
17. Kou M, etal. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles for immunomodulation and regeneration: a next generation therapeutic tool? Cell Death Dis. 2022;13:580. https://doi.
org/10.1038/s41419- 022- 05034- x.
18. Lo Sicco C, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular
vesicles as mediators of anti-inammatory effects: endorsement of
macrophage polarization. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2017;6:1018–
28. https://doi.org/10.1002/sctm.16- 0363.
19. Ti D, et al. LPS-preconditioned mesenchymal stromal cells
modify macrophage polarization for resolution of chronic inammation via exosome-shuttled let-7b. J Transl Med. 2015;13:308.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967- 015- 0642- 6.
20. Yu B, etal. Exosomes derived from MSCs ameliorate retinal laser
injury partially by inhibition of MCP-1. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34562.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34562.
21. Yang J, et al. Extracellular vesicles derived from bone marrow
mesenchymal stem cells protect against experimental colitis via
attenuating colon inammation, oxidative stress and apoptosis.
PLoS One. 2015;10:e0140551. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.
pone.0140551.
22. Monguio-Tortajada M, et al. Nanosized UCMSC-derived extracellular vesicles but not conditioned medium exclusively inhibit
the inammatory response of stimulated T cells: implications
for nanomedicine. Theranostics. 2017;7:270–84. https://doi.
org/10.7150/thno.16154.
23. Ti D, Hao H, Fu X, Han W. Mesenchymal stem cells-derived
exosomal microRNAs contribute to wound inammation. Sci
China Life Sci. 2016;59:1305–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s11427- 016- 0240- 4.
24. Liang X, Zhang L, Wang S, Han Q, Zhao RC.Exosomes secreted
by mesenchymal stem cells promote endothelial cell angiogenesis
by transferring miR-125a. J Cell Sci. 2016;129:2182–9. https://
doi.org/10.1242/jcs.170373.
25. Ren S, etal. Microvesicles from human adipose stem cells promote wound healing by optimizing cellular functions via AKT and
ERK signaling pathways. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10:47. https://
doi.org/10.1186/s13287- 019- 1152- x.
26. Zhang J, etal. Exosomes released from human induced pluripotent stem cells-derived MSCs facilitate cutaneous wound healing
by promoting collagen synthesis and angiogenesis. J Transl Med.
2015;13:49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967- 015- 0417- 0.
27. Hu L, etal. Exosomes derived from human adipose mensenchymal stem cells accelerates cutaneous wound healing via optimizing the characteristics of broblasts. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32993.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32993.
28. McBride JD, etal. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived
CD63(+) exosomes transport Wnt3a exteriorly and enhance dermal broblast proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis invitro.
Stem Cells Dev. 2017;26:1384–98. https://doi.org/10.1089/
scd.2017.0087.

284
https://t.me/med1917
G. Theocharidis and J. Li
29. Cooper DR, etal. Human adipose-derived stem cell conditioned
media and exosomes containing MALAT1 promote human dermal broblast migration and ischemic wound healing. Adv Wound
Care (New Rochelle). 2018;7:299–308. https://doi.org/10.1089/
wound.2017.0775.
30. Zhang B, et al. HucMSC-exosome mediated-Wnt4 signaling is
required for cutaneous wound healing. Stem Cells. 2015;33:2158–
68. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.1771.
31. Martin P. Wound healing—aiming for perfect skin regeneration. Science. 1997;276:75–81. https://doi.org/10.1126/
science.276.5309.75.
32. Wang L, et al. Exosomes secreted by human adipose mesenchymal stem cells promote scarless cutaneous repair by regulating
extracellular matrix remodelling. Sci Rep. 2017;7:13321. https://
doi.org/10.1038/s41598- 017- 12919- x.
33. Fang S, et al. Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cellderived Exosomal MicroRNAs suppress Myobroblast differentiation by inhibiting the transforming growth factor-beta/
SMAD2 pathway during wound healing. Stem Cells Transl Med.
2016;5:1425–39. https://doi.org/10.5966/sctm.2015- 0367.
34. Zhao B, et al. Exosomes derived from human amniotic epithelial cells accelerate wound healing and inhibit scar formation. J Mol Histol. 2017;48:121–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10735- 017- 9711- x.
35. Zhang D, etal. Exosome-mediated small RNA delivery: a novel
therapeutic approach for inammatory lung responses. Mol Ther.
2018;26:2119–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.06.007.
36. Li M, etal. Macrophage-derived exosomes accelerate wound healing through their anti-inammation effects in a diabetic rat model.
Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2019;47:3793–803. https://doi.
org/10.1080/21691401.2019.1669617.
37. Chen J, et al. Blockade of lncRNA-ASLNCS5088-enriched exosome generation in M2 macrophages by GW4869 dampens the effect
of M2 macrophages on orchestrating broblast activation. FASEB
J. 2019;33:12200–12. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201901610.
38. Han X, et al. Exosomes derived from autologous dermal broblasts promote diabetic cutaneous wound healing through the Akt/
beta-catenin pathway. Cell Cycle. 2021;20:616–29. https://doi.org
/10.1080/15384101.2021.1894813.
39. Oh EJ, etal. Extracellular vesicles derived from broblasts promote wound healing by optimizing broblast and endothelial
cellular functions. Stem Cells. 2021;39:266–79. https://doi.
org/10.1002/stem.3310.
40. Li Q, Zhao H, Chen W, Huang P, Bi J.Human keratinocyte-derived
microvesicle miRNA-21 promotes skin wound healing in diabetic
rats through facilitating broblast function and angiogenesis. Int
J Biochem Cell Biol. 2019;114:105570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
biocel.2019.105570.
41. Huang P, et al. Keratinocyte microvesicles regulate the expression of multiple genes in dermal broblasts. J Invest Dermatol.
2015;135:3051–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2015.320.
42. Glady A, Vandebroek A, Yasui M. Human keratinocyte-derived
extracellular vesicles activate the MAPKinase pathway and promote cell migration and proliferation in vitro. Inamm Regen.
2021;41:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41232- 021- 00154- x.
43. Wang P, etal. Exosomes derived from epidermal stem cells improve
diabetic wound healing. J Invest Dermatol. 2022;142:2508–2517
e2513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2022.01.030.
44. Goetzl EJ, etal. Altered cargo proteins of human plasma endothelial cell-derived exosomes in atherosclerotic cerebrovascular
disease. FASEB J. 2017;31:3689–94. https://doi.org/10.1096/
fj.201700149.
45. Wei F, etal. Plasma endothelial cells-derived extracellular vesicles
promote wound healing in diabetes through YAP and the PI3K/
Akt/mTOR pathway. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12:12002–18.
https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.103366.
46. Zeng T, etal. Endothelial cell-derived small extracellular vesicles
suppress cutaneous wound healing through regulating broblasts
autophagy. Clin Sci (Lond). 2019;133:CS20190008. https://doi.
org/10.1042/CS20190008.
47. Qi L, Lu Y, Wang Z, Zhang G. microRNA-106b derived from
endothelial cell-secreted extracellular vesicles prevents skin
wound healing by inhibiting JMJD3 and RIPK3. J Cell Mol Med.
2021;25:4551–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.16037.
48. Guo SC, etal. Exosomes derived from platelet-rich plasma promote the re-epithelization of chronic cutaneous wounds via activation of YAP in a diabetic rat model. Theranostics. 2017;7:81–96.
https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.16803.
49. Xu Y, et al. Platelet-rich plasma-derived Exosomal USP15 promotes cutaneous wound healing via deubiquitinating EIF4A1.
Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2021;2021:9674809. https://doi.
org/10.1155/2021/9674809.
50. Hu Y, et al. Exosomes from human umbilical cord blood accelerate cutaneous wound healing through miR-21-3p-mediated
promotion of angiogenesis and broblast function. Theranostics.
2018;8:169–84. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.21234.
51. Armstrong JP, Holme MN, Stevens MM.Re-engineering extracellular vesicles as smart nanoscale therapeutics. ACS Nano.
2017;11:69–83. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b07607.
52. Wolff JA, Malone RW, Williams P, Chong W, Acsadi G,
Jani A, Felgner PL. Direct gene transfer into mouse muscle
in vivo. Science. 1990;247:1465–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/
science.1690918.
53. Balmayor ER.Synthetic mRNA—emerging new class of drug for
tissue regeneration. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2022;74:8–14. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2021.10.015.
54. Hou X, Zaks T, Langer R, Dong Y.Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA
delivery. Nat Rev Mater. 2021;6:1078–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/
s41578- 021- 00358- 0.
55. Elkhalifa D, Rayan M, Negmeldin AT, Elhissi A, Khalil
A. Chemically modied mRNA beyond COVID-19: potential
preventive and therapeutic applications for targeting chronic
diseases. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;145:112385. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112385.
56. Kim SC, et al. Modications of mRNA vaccine structural elements for improving mRNA stability and translation efciency. Mol Cell Toxicol. 2022;18:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s13273- 021- 00171- 4.
57. Miao L, Zhang Y, Huang L. mRNA vaccine for cancer immunotherapy. Mol Cancer. 2021;20:41. https://doi.org/10.1186/
s12943- 021- 01335- 5.
58. Wang C, Zhang Y, Dong Y. Lipid nanoparticle-mRNA formulations for therapeutic applications. Acc Chem Res. 2021;54:4283–
93. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00550.
59. Li B, et al. Engineering CRISPR–Cpf1 crRNAs and mRNAs
to maximize genome editing efciency. Nat Biomed Eng.
2017;1:1–10.
60. Zhao W, Hou X, Vick OG, Dong Y. RNA delivery biomaterials for the treatment of genetic and rare diseases.
Biomaterials. 2019;217:119291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
biomaterials.2019.119291.
61. Dimitradis GJ.Translation of rabbit globin mRN a introduced by
Iiposomes into mouse lymphocytes. Nature. 1978;274:923–4.
62. Robinson E, etal. Lipid nanoparticle-delivered chemically modied mRNA restores chloride secretion in cystic brosis. Mol Ther.
2018;26:2034–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.05.014.
63. Akinc A, et al. The Onpattro story and the clinical translation of nanomedicines containing nucleic acid-based drugs.
Nat Nanotechnol. 2019;14:1084–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/
s41565- 019- 0591- y.
64. Islam N, Sheils NE, Jarvis MS, Cohen K. Comparative effectiveness over time of the mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccine and

15 Role ofExtracellular Vesicles, Modied mRNA, miRNA, andsiRNA inDiabetic Lower Extremity Complications
https://t.me/med1917
285
the BNT162b2 (Pzer-BioNTech) vaccine. Nat Commun.
2022;13:2377.
65. Zhang W, et al. Lipid carriers for mRNA delivery. Acta Pharm
Sin B. 2022;13(10):4105–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
apsb.2022.11.026.
66. Zhang Y, Sun C, Wang C, Jankovic KE, Dong Y.Lipids and lipid
derivatives for RNA delivery. Chem Rev. 2021;121:12181–277.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00244.
67. Li B, Zhang X, Dong Y. Nanoscale platforms for messenger
RNA delivery. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol.
2019;11:e1530. https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.1530.
68. Han X, etal. Ligand-tethered lipid nanoparticles for targeted RNA
delivery to treat liver brosis. Nat Commun. 2023;14:75. https://
doi.org/10.1038/s41467- 022- 35637- z.
69. Ball RL, Hajj KA, Vizelman J, Bajaj P, Whitehead KA. Lipid
nanoparticle formulations for enhanced co-delivery of siRNA and
mRNA.Nano Lett. 2018;18:3814–22. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.
nanolett.8b01101.
70. Torchilin V, etal. P-Nitrophenylcarbonyl-PEG-PE-liposomes: fast
and simple attachment of specic ligands, including monoclonal
antibodies, to distal ends of PEG chains via p-nitrophenylcarbonyl
groups. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001;1511:397–411.
71. Veiga N, etal. Cell specic delivery of modied mRNA expressing therapeutic proteins to leukocytes. Nat Commun. 2018;9:4493.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467- 018- 06936- 1.
72. Paunovska K, Loughrey D, Dahlman JE.Drug delivery systems
for RNA therapeutics. Nat Rev Genet. 2022;23:265–80. https://
doi.org/10.1038/s41576- 021- 00439- 4.
73. Linares-Fernandez S, et al. Combining an optimized mRNA
template with a double purication process allows strong expression of in vitro transcribed mRNA. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids.
2021;26:945–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtn.2021.10.007.
74. Oberli MA, et al. Lipid nanoparticle assisted mRNA delivery
for potent cancer immunotherapy. Nano Lett. 2017;17:1326–35.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03329.
75. Wojcik R, et al. Novel N7-arylmethyl substituted dinucleotide
mRNA 5′ cap analogs: synthesis and evaluation as modulators of
translation. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:1941.
76. Kariko K, Buckstein M, Ni H, Weissman D. Suppression of
RNA recognition by toll-like receptors: the impact of nucleoside modication and the evolutionary origin of RNA.Immunity.
2005;23:165–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2005.06.008.
77. Uchida S, Kataoka K, Itaka K. Screening of mRNA chemical modication to maximize protein expression with reduced
immunogenicity. Pharmaceutics. 2015;7:137–51. https://doi.
org/10.3390/pharmaceutics7030137.
78. Li B, Luo X, Dong Y.Effects of chemically modied messenger
RNA on protein expression. Bioconjug Chem. 2016;27:849–53.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00090.
79. Andries O, et al. N1-methylpseudouridine-incorporated mRNA
outperforms pseudouridine-incorporated mRNA by providing
enhanced protein expression and reduced immunogenicity in mammalian cell lines and mice. J Control Release. 2015;217:337–44.
80. Uchida S, Perche F, Pichon C, Cabral H. Nanomedicine-based
approaches for mRNA delivery. Mol Pharm. 2020;17:3654–84.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00618.
81. Moradian H, Roch T, Lendlein A, Gossen M. mRNA transfectioninduced activation of primary human monocytes and macrophages:
dependence on carrier system and nucleotide modication. Sci
Rep. 2020;10:4181. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598- 020- 60506- 4.
82. Spiliopoulos S, Festas G, Paraskevopoulos I, Mariappan M,
Brountzos E.Overcoming ischemia in the diabetic foot: minimally
invasive treatment options. World J Diabetes. 2021;12:2011–26.
https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v12.i12.2011.
83. Zha W, et al. Efcient delivery of VEGF-A mRNA for promoting diabetic wound healing via ionizable lipid nanopar-
ticles. Int J Pharm. 2023;632:122565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
ijpharm.2022.122565.
84. Dong S, et al. Efcient delivery of VEGFA mRNA for promoting wound healing via ionizable lipid nanoparticles.
Bioorg Med Chem. 2023;78:117135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
bmc.2022.117135.
85. Yu F, et al. Human adipose-derived stem cells enriched with
VEGF-modied mRNA promote angiogenesis and long-term
graft survival in a fat graft transplantation model. Stem Cell Res
Ther. 2020;11:490. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287- 020- 02008- 8.
86. Gan LM, etal. Intradermal delivery of modied mRNA encoding VEGF-A in patients with type 2 diabetes. Nat Commun.
2019;10:871. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467- 019- 08852- 4.
87. Rikard SM, etal. Mathematical model predicts that acceleration
of diabetic wound healing is dependent on spatial distribution of
VEGF-A mRNA (AZD8601). Cell Mol Bioeng. 2021;14:321–38.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195- 021- 00678- 9.
88. Almquist J, et al. Model-based analysis reveals a sustained and
dose-dependent acceleration of wound healing by VEGF-A
mRNA (AZD8601). CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol.
2020;9:384–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12516.
89. Sun N, etal. Modied VEGF-A mRNA induces sustained multifaceted microvascular response and accelerates diabetic wound
healing. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1–11.
90. Carlsson L, et al. Biocompatible, puried VEGF-A mRNA
improves cardiac function after Intracardiac injection 1 week
post-myocardial infarction in swine. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev.
2018;9:330–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2018.04.003.
91. Zangi L, etal. Modied mRNA directs the fate of heart progenitor
cells and induces vascular regeneration after myocardial infarction. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:898–907. https://doi.org/10.1038/
nbt.2682.
92. Mullard A. mRNA-based drug approaches phase I milestone.
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016;15:595. https://doi.org/10.1038/
nrd.2016.182.
93. Xiaojie W, et al. Scarless wound healing: current insights from
the perspectives of TGF-β, KGF-1, and KGF-2. Cytokine Growth
Factor Rev. 2022;66:26–37.
94. Cai J, etal. Comparative analysis of KGF-2 and bFGF in prevention of excessive wound healing and scar formation in a corneal
alkali burn model. Cornea. 2019;38:1430–7.
95. Choi SM, etal. Effects of structurally stabilized EGF and bFGF on
wound healing in type I and type II diabetic mice. Acta Biomater.
2018;66:325–34.
96. Hui Q, Jin Z, Li X, Liu C, Wang X.FGF family: from drug development to clinical application. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:1875.
97. Shi R, et al. Nanosphere-mediated co-delivery of VEGF-A and
PDGF-B genes for accelerating diabetic foot ulcers healing in rats.
Gene Ther. 2018;25:425–38.
98. Wittrup A, et al. Visualizing lipid-formulated siRNA release
from endosomes and target gene knockdown. Nat Biotechnol.
2015;33:870–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3298.
99. Scott LJ.Givosiran: rst approval. Drugs. 2020;80:335–9. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s40265- 020- 01269- 0.
100. Zhong R, et al. Hydrogels for RNA delivery. Nat
Mater. 2023;22(7):818–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/
s41563- 023- 01472- w.
101. Semple SC, et al. Rational design of cationic lipids for siRNA
delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:172–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/
nbt.1602.
102. Mazure NM, etal. HIF-1: master and commander of the hypoxic
world. A pharmacological approach to its regulation by siRNAs.
Biochem Pharmacol. 2004;68:971–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
bcp.2004.04.022.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
