Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_896_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
33 Мб
Скачать
7 Physiology andPathophysiology ofWound Healing inDiabetes
https://t.me/med1917
111
TGF-ß2 [23, 24]. A single lineage of broblasts that express the gene Engrailed-1 (En1) is the main culprit of brosis and scar formation during cutaneous wound healing. This differ­ence in capacity to form a scar is cell intrinsic and permanent [25]. Elegant studies using genetic fate-mapping techniques at the single cell level found that a lineage of broblasts that do not express EN1 are responsible for forming the structural ECM during embryonic development. This lineage subse­quently declines during development with a concurrent increase in EN1 expressing broblasts, providing a rationale for why adult skin in higher-order vertebrates is prone to scarring and why embryonic skin can regenerate with no scar [26]. Furthermore, this transition can be reversed by trans­planting EN1 naïve cells into the local wound microenviron­ment. A subpopulation of EN1 naïve cells in postnatal mice give rise to postnatally EN1 expressing cells by activating EN1 expression during wound healing. EN1 expression is induced by mechanical tension and canonical mechanotrans­duction signaling pathways. Wound regeneration (versus scarring) can be induced in adult mice by blocking this path­way with small molecule inhibitors and genetic knockout techniques [27]. A recent study constructed a broblast atlas by integrating single-cell transcriptomic data from about 230,000 broblasts across 17 tissues, 50 datasets, and 11 dis­ease states, and both mice and humans found the existence of two universal broblast subtypes across all tissues dened by the expression of Pi16 (peptidase inhibitor 16) and Col15a1 (collagen-type XV alpha-1 chain). The roles of these universal broblasts include ECM secretion, collagen production, and basement membrane maintenance. Furthermore, these subtypes serve as a reservoir that yields two broad classes of specialized broblasts: steady-state broblasts in tissues and activated broblasts in disease and perturbed states such as wound healing. Lrrc15+ (leucine rich repeat containing 15) cluster was implicated in wound healing as well as arthritis, brosis, and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. This cluster also showed high expression of Cthrc1 (collagen triple-helix repeat containing 1), Acta2 (actin alpha 2), Postn (periostin), Adam12 (ADAM metallo­peptidase domain 12), and collagens, suggesting they were composed of predominantly myobroblasts [28]. Furthermore, IGF1 (insulin-like growth factor) was found implicated in myobroblast formation, and WNT4 (WNT family member 4) was primarily involved in the ability of broblasts to support epidermal stratication and mainte­nance [29]. These studies are just beginning to shed light on the key organizing principals of the broblast lineage in development and disease. They revealed that nonoverlapping disease-associated broblasts reside in specic locations/tis­sues which are different from normal and/or embryonic broblasts involved in tissue repair and regeneration. This revelation has profound implications in drug discovery and
therapeutic development, whereby one can specically tar­get broblasts involved in wound healing pathology [30].
In response to skin injury, local dermal broblasts are activated and begin to proliferate. Twist1 (Twist family BHLH transcription factor 1)-Prrx1-(Twist1-paired-related homeobox 1)-TNC (tenascin-C)-positive feedback loop is implicated in broblast activation in wound healing [31]. A few days later during the process, broblast migrate into the provisional matrix of the wound clot where they begin to produce the major constituents of the ECM, which is rich in collagen [3234]. A critical discriminator between bro­blasts in dermal development versus wound healing is that dermal maturation occurs without active broblast migration [35]. The ECM acts as both a scaffold and a reservoir, whereby it provides structure to the healing wound and attachment sites for the various cells and sequesters signal­ing molecules that are involved in crucial wound healing process such as angiogenesis, cell proliferation, cell migra­tion, and inammation [36, 37]. Additionally, broblasts are indispensable for producing a stromal address which directs leukocyte behavior within tissues including trafcking, dif­ferentiation, and survival [38]. Dysregulation of this stromal address leads to chronic inammatory disease [38].
Dermal broblasts at the site of injury begin to proliferate as an early response to wounding. A few days after wound­ing, broblasts migrate into the provisional matrix of the wound clot to lay down their own collagen-rich matrix [32
34]. This ECM acts as a “scaffold” during tissue repair, pro-
viding structural support and attachment sites for cell surface receptors while simultaneously acting as a regulated “reser­voir” for signaling molecules that modulate diverse pro­cesses such as angiogenesis, cell proliferation, cell migration, and inammation [36, 37]. In order to migrate into the clot, dermal broblasts must downregulate their collagen recep­tors and upregulate integrins that bind ECM proteins such as brin, bronectin, and vitronectin [39, 40]. During migra­tion, broblasts sense and respond to signals coming from both their local matrix environment and from the surround­ing growth factor milieu.
About 1 week after wounding, the wound clot is fully invaded by activated broblasts. Transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGFß-1) is a potent pro-brotic signaling molecule that with other growth factors stimulates broblasts to syn­thesize and remodel the new collagen-rich matrix [33, 34,
39]. Simultaneously, a proportion of the wound broblasts
transform into myobroblasts, which express α-smooth mus­cle actin and resemble smooth muscle cells in their capacity for generating strong contractile forces [41, 42].
Conversion from broblasts to myobroblasts is medi­ated not only by growth factors, especially TGF-ß1 [41, 43,
44], but also by mechanical tension [4548]. Myobroblasts
align parallel to mechanical tension building up in the granu-
112
https://t.me/med1917
I. Pastar et al.
lation tissue, and their appearance in the wound coincides with a strong induction of contractile properties. Collagen­gel models have been useful for the study of various tensile forces acting on and exerted by wound broblasts before, during, and after their contraction. Several growth factors present in the wound site and ECM reservoir are stimulators of broblast-driven gel contraction, which can presumably induce granulation tissue contraction in vivo [49, 50]. Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-AA and PDGF-BB isoforms and TGF-ß1 lead to efcient collagen-gel contrac­tion and can be considered stimulatory [4952], while IL-1α and IL-1ß were shown to be inhibitory, which is due to increased matrix metalloproteinase activity [53, 54].
Contraction stop signals have been studied in a similar manner by releasing mechanically stressed anchored gels from their substrate attachments, which simulates the loss of resistance after a wound has closed. Within minutes of release from resisting forces, PDGF and EGF receptors on the cell surface become deactivated [55], and the relaxed cells return to a quiescent state similar to that existing before the injury. Fibroblasts present in the granulation tissue undergo apoptosis, triggered by TGF-ß1 and FGF at the injury site, after wound contraction has ceased [56, 57]. Together, these mechanisms promote a return to the normal physiologic state and location of broblasts after the process of healing has completed.
Given the importance of broblasts and keratinocytes in proper wound healing, human skin substitutes have been developed as a wound treatment modality. Several cell thera­pies are approved for use in diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and two in particular utilize broblasts. Graftskin (Apligraf) is a human skin equivalent composed of a dermal layer contain­ing human broblasts and connective tissue and an epider­mal layer consisting of keratinocytes [58]. Similarly, Dermagraft is a human dermal substitute consisting of cryo­preserved human broblasts, ECM, and a bioabsorbable scaffold [59]. Thus, broblasts and keratinocytes are vitally important for the maintenance of the epidermal barrier as well as the process of wound healing after injury while also showing great promise in their practical translation to the bedside. Please see treatments section for additional information.
Endothelial Cells (ECs)
Local ECs are additional responders to the wound healing signals released by keratinocytes and broblasts. Normally, ECs are located in the wall of the vascular lumen forming the tubular structure of blood vessels and the barrier between blood and extravascular tissue. They express integrins and other cell adhesion molecules to allow selective permeability between these two compartments and are highly upregulated
during angiogenesis [60, 61]. The process of angiogenesis is facilitated by growth factors, cytokines, cell-cell and cell­matrix interactions, and even exosomes from certain stem cells that activate these ECs [62]. These activated ECs along with platelets, macrophages, and broblasts release pro­angiogenic cytokines that lead to the invasion and migration of ECs into the ECM, EC proliferation, and new immature vascular formation [63, 64]. Before angiogenesis can begin, ECs must detach from neighboring ECs primarily by digest­ing the basement membrane and components of the ECM [64, 65]. This is achieved by proteolytic enzymes, including serine proteases, urokinase plasminogen activator, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) that are released by acti­vated ECs [66]. The addition of an MMP synthetic inhibitor to EC cultures signicantly decreases angiogenic activity [66], highlighting the importance of this group of enzymes to EC function. Once they are liberated, ECs migrate to the site of new vessel formation via vascular endothelial growth fac­tor (VEGF)-stimulated chemotaxis where they will prolifer­ate [64, 66, 67]. Additionally, specic adhesion molecules, especially integrins, mediate endothelial cell-matrix interac­tions to ensure migration to the site of new vessel formation [64, 67]. Functional capillary formation in wound healing relies on induction of capillary growth, removal of most endothelial cells during resolution, and successful matura­tion [68]. In the maturation phase, blood vessel pericytes increase and spread, and endothelial cells produce a func­tional basement membrane [68]. Finally, wound resolution and remodeling phases are induced by the inhibition of endo­thelial cell movement governed by anti-angiogenic factors capable of inducing vascular regression and capillary prun­ing [68].
Neutrophils
Inammation is a key process of normal wound healing and is tightly regulated both temporally and spatially by multiple cell types. Immediately following injury, activation of the clotting cascade ensues causing platelet aggregation and leading to the formation of a brin clot which initiates hemo­stasis. These processes are important to stop blood and uid loss as well as to provide a provisional matrix that facilitates the inltration and recruitment of inammatory cells and other cells to the injury site [1, 69]. Platelets degranulate and release a variety of growth factors and cytokines that act as chemoattractants for cells such as neutrophils, macrophages, endothelial cells, broblasts, and keratinocytes resulting in the initiation of the inammatory phase [1, 70]. The rst inammatory cells to migrate to the wound site are the neu­trophils which are the predominant cell type during the rst 2 days. Their role is to remove dead cells and infectious microorganisms by phagocytosis and generation of reactive
7 Physiology andPathophysiology ofWound Healing inDiabetes
https://t.me/med1917
113
oxygen species or by releasing neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) [7174]. Neutrophil activity has to be rapid to mini­mize host tissue damage and excessive inammation, and the cells undergo apoptosis or die by NETosis once infection is under control [75]. After a few days, neutrophil inltration ceases, and expended neutrophils are phagocytosed by macrophages.
Macrophages
Macrophages appear at the wound site within 2days after injury and play an important role in clearing matrix, cell debris, and microorganisms. Both inammatory monocytes, recruited from the bone marrow that later become macro­phages, and resident macrophages are recruited to the wound site [76, 77]. These macrophage populations change their expression proles according to cytokine and growth factor stimuli [78, 79]. During normal wound healing, mac­rophages transition from a pro-inammatory or “M1” phe­notype to a wound healing-associated or “M2” phenotype [80, 81]. M1 macrophages dominate earlier during injury and express pro- inammatory mediators and cytokines including TNFα, IL-1, IL-6, IL-12, and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), whereas M2 macrophages dominate later during injury and express anti-inammatory genes as well as promote ECM synthesis and cell proliferation [81
83]. The M2 macrophage population include multiple sub-
types such as the pro- healing subtype (M2a), pro-remodeling (M2b), and anti-inammatory (M2f) [84]. Several factors mediate the phenotypic switch that include anti-inamma­tory cytokines (e.g., IL-4 and IL-13) and phagocytosis of apoptotic neutrophils that triggers the release of pro-healing growth factors and suppress pro-inammatory factors to augment the tissue repair process [8486]. Diabetic mouse models demonstrate a dysregulated and persistent M1 mac­rophage polarization compared to normal wounds [87]. Macrophages also release a battery of growth factors, che­mokines, and MMPs [77], which all aid in driving cell pro­liferation and ECM synthesis. Sustained inammasome activation in macrophages from diabetic wounds has been demonstrated to contribute to the inhibition of wound heal­ing and pharmacological inhibition of inammasomes resulted in phenotypic switch to pro- healing macrophages with increased growth factor production and improved heal­ing [88].
Mast Cells
Mast cells are one of the rst responders to injury and are involved in neutrophil recruitment, clot stability, angiogene­sis, and brogenesis [8991]. Mast cells quickly become
activated and increase in number over time during wound healing. At the site of injury, mast cells undergo degranula­tion and release their pre-stored factors that inuence the repair process [8991]. Diabetic wounds are characterized by increased degranulated mast cells, and the inhibition of mast cell degranulation promotes wound healing and shifts macrophages to the pro-healing M2 macrophage phenotype [9193]. However, mice decient for mast cells display impaired healing, indicating that certain mast cell mediators are required for proper healing [92].
Inammatory cells also exert their inuence on the sur­rounding tissue by generating nitric oxide (NO) and large amounts of ROS [94]. NO and ROS are known to drive cer­tain aspects of repair [95, 96], but, at the same time, affected wound cells must protect themselves by detoxifying pro­grams [94, 97]. NO is a very transitory molecule, whose lev­els together with inducible NO synthase (iNOS) activity shows a distinct time course during normal healing [98, 99]. Recent studies have demonstrated the essential need for inammatory cells that include macrophages and neutrophils that coordinate the early phase of the tissue repair process by exerting profound inuences on other cell types present in the wound environment [100103]. One of the important roles of inammatory cytokines is to regulate angiogenesis, which they accomplish in concert with signals from other wound cells and from serum (see section on angiogenesis). However, nonhealing wounds fail to progress through the normal phases of wound repair, but instead remain in a sup­pressed and prolonged inammatory state [101103]. Imbalances in wound proteases and their inhibitors in chronic wounds, because of sustained production of inammatory mediators and inux of inammatory cells, prevent matrix synthesis and remodeling, essential for progression to a healed wound [104109].
Pathophysiology ofWound Healing inDiabetes Mellitus
Over 415million people worldwide have diabetes with an estimated 29.1million affected people in the United States alone. These numbers incur annual costs of more than $245billion, rendering it a major public health and socio­economic concern [110]. The prevalence of diabetes is on an upward trend, possibly affecting one-third of the US adult population by 2030 [111]. Diabetes has many devastating complications, one of which is DFUs, which occurs in 15% of diabetic patients often leading to lower-limb amputations [1]. Following amputation, DFU patients have a 5-year mor­tality rate of nearly 50% [112]. DFUs often lead to lengthier hospitalization with associated high treatment costs, pain, and reduced quality of life [113, 114] and are a signicant cause of morbidity and mortality [115].
114
https://t.me/med1917
I. Pastar et al.
Wound healing is a dynamic process comprising of overlapping phases of hemostasis, inammation, prolifera­tion, and remodeling that involve multiple cell types. This highly organized and coordinated series of processes results in the restoration of tissue integrity and functions. Deregulation in any of these processes leads to a delayed or nonhealing phenotype as seen in DFUs [1, 112, 116]. Factors that contribute to the delayed wound healing seen in diabetes are multifactorial and include macro- and microvascular, neuropathic, immune functions, and bio­chemical abnormalities. Indeed a recent study provided evidence that additional diabetic- associated problems may play an important role in the development of DFUs since only subtle changes were found between non-ulcerated non-neuropathic diabetic foot skin and healthy nondiabetic foot skin using comparative genomic analyses as well as detailed histomorphological evaluations [117, 118]. Poor glucose control and hyperglycemia are additional factors that may contribute to the metabolic pathophysiology of diabetes-related complications [119, 120]. DFU develop­ment involves both extrinsic and intrinsic factors. Extrinsic factors include callous formation, excessive pressure, repeated trauma, and wound infection [121], while intrinsic factors that contribute to an impairment in diabetic wound healing include prolonged inammation, persistent infec­tion, imbalanced proteolytic activity, improper formation and remodeling of the ECM, reduced growth factors, poor angiogenesis and various cell type and stem cell dysfunc­tion, cellular senescence, and reduced reepithelialization
[1, 122125]. Prolonged hypoxia [126] and reduced levels of neuropeptides [127] have all been shown to contribute to the impaired wound healing in DFUs.
Keratinocytes’ andFibroblasts’ Role inImpaired Wound Healing
Upon cutaneous injury, epidermal keratinocytes become activated. However, this activation is not properly executed in chronic wounds, and migration and proliferation of these cells are affected as a result. The EGF family, particularly family members involved in wound healing such as EGF, heparin-binding EGF (HB-EGF), and TGF-α can bind and activate the EGF receptor (EGFR), thus leading to the stimu­lation of keratinocyte migration and proliferation [15]. Lee etal. (2005) showed that EGF-mediated migration is blocked by glucocorticoids, and this occurs through repressing K6/ K16 transcription [128]. In the nonhealing edge of chronic wounds, EGF receptor (EGFR) is expressed in the cytoplasm of keratinocytes instead of the membrane as with normal epi­dermis [129], suggesting that these cells are unable to respond to EGF ligands. This may be a likely reason why topical application of EGF, in an attempt to heal human chronic wounds, is met with limited success [130]. Nonhealing ulcer keratinocytes are hyperproliferative in both basal and suprabasal layers of the epidermis, giving rise to parakeratosis and hyperkeratosis, indicating impaired dif­ferentiation (Fig.7.1) [131, 132]. The differentiation mark-
ab
Fig. 7.1 Histology of DFU (a) compared to adjacent non-ulcerated diabetic foot skin (b). DFUs display a hyperproliferative nonmigratory epidermis with parakeratosis. Signicantly thicker cornied layer (hyperkeratosis) and the presence nuclei in the cornied layer (para-
keratosis) are characteristic for DFUs (a) and not present in adjacent non-ulcerated diabetic skin (b). E epidermis, D dermis, CL cornied layer, I inammatory cellular inltrate; arrows indicate nuclei in the cornied layer. Scale bar=200μm
ab
7 Physiology andPathophysiology ofWound Healing inDiabetes
https://t.me/med1917
115
ers K1/K10, laggrin, and a subgroup of small proline-rich proteins were found to be suppressed, while the late differen­tiation markers transglutaminase 1 and involucrin were induced in nonhealing venous ulcers [132]. In a prospective clinical study, it was shown that the nonmigratory and hyper­proliferative phenotype of keratinocytes seen at the nonheal­ing wound edge of chronic ulcers was attributed to nuclear presence and overexpression of the oncogene c-myc and β-catenin (Fig. 7.2), contributing to epidermal stem cell depletion [122, 133]. In addition, stabilization of nuclear β-catenin inhibited wound healing and keratinocyte migra­tion by blocking EGF response, inducing c-myc and repress-
Fig. 7.2 Wound edge of the chronic DFU shows overexpression of c-myc. Immunohistochemistry with c-myc-specic antibody of healing (a) and nonhealing DFU (b). Nuclear presence and overexpression of c-myc (brown) contributes to hyperproliferative phenotype in the non­healing DFU.Healing DFU has less c-myc positive nuclei; dashed lined demarcates epidermal-dermal boundary
ing K6/K16 in vitro [133]. Mechanisms of β-catenin activation in DFU keratinocytes also involve membranous glucocorticoid receptor (mbGR) signaling [134, 135]. While glucocorticoids are established inhibitors of reepithelializa­tion acting through the phosphorylation and nuclearization of GRs, mbGR inhibits wound reepithelialization by activat­ing a Wnt-like phospholipase/protein kinase C signaling resulting in atypical activation of β-catenin and c-myc [134,
136]. Importantly, the inhibitory effects of glucocorticoids
can be reversed by topical application of statins, widely used inhibitors of cholesterol synthesis, resulting in enhanced wound closure through inhibition of GR activation and sup­pression of local, cutaneous cortisol synthesis [137, 138]. In addition, topical mevastatin-induced expression of noncod­ing RNA Gas5 resulted in suppression of c-myc and acceler­ated wound closure [138]. Despite the hyperproliferative phenotype characterized by overexpression of oncogenes, DFU epidermis remains protected from tumor development due to newly discovered mechanism governed by miRNA­193b- 3p targeting proto-oncogene KRAS (Kirsten rat sar­coma viral proto-oncogene) and KIT (KIT proto-oncogene) [139]. Furthermore, miRNA-193b-3p has a dominant­negative effect on cellular migration by targeting compo­nents of keratinocyte actin cytoskeleton, and inhibition of stress ber formation mediated by RhoA, required for directed migration and successful wound closure [139]. Moreover, the epidermis of chronic nonhealing DFU has also been shown to exhibit decreased expression of the pre­cursor of the alpha 3 chain of laminin [140], and increased levels of Cav1 (Caveolin 1) involved in sequestration of the growth factor signaling and diminished Rho GTPases activ­ity contributing to impaired reepithelialization and inhibition of wound closure [141, 142]. The lack of keratinocyte migra­tion in DFU and insufcient inammation may also be a consequence of the deregulated expression of immune inhib­itory receptor ligand-programmed death ligand 1 (PDL1) [143]. Transmembrane protein PDL1 was found downregu­lated in DFU epidermis, contributing to delayed wound clo­sure, while PDL1 treatment improved wound closure and modulated prolonged inammation in a mouse diabetic wounds [143].
Additional characteristic of the DFU epidermal keratino­cytes is their inability to properly respond to DNA damage. DFU keratinocytes are characterized by accumulated DNA breaks as a result of suppression of the plethora of DNA repair genes (double-strand break repair protein, RAD50; MutS homolog 2, MSH2; WEE1 G2 checkpoint kinase; tumor protein P53; and receptor tyrosine kinase, KIT) [144]. This marked downregulation of the DNA repair genes is gov­erned by miRNA15b-5p, overexpressed due to the accumu­lation of Staphylococcus aureus, the most common DFU pathogen [144].
116
https://t.me/med1917
I. Pastar et al.
Altered Fibroblast Function inDFU
Fibroblast dysfunction is a dening feature of the DFU [42,
145151]. Wound broblasts from diabetic patients display
impaired migration, proliferation, ECM production and deposition, resistance to growth factors, altered morphology, and increased cell death [42, 125, 151156]. Isolated DFU broblasts also display induced cell differentiation and senescence pathways [125]. Cellular aging and senescence and the profound altered metabolic changes of diabetic bro­blasts stimulated by chronic hypoxia and hyperglycemia are broadly implicated in DFUF dysfunction [126, 157].
Recent studies using single-cell RNA sequencing tech­nology have also implicated broblast heterogeneity in DFUs [103, 158]. Compared to acute wounds, diabetic ulcer foot broblasts (DFUF) displayed increased expression of pro-brotic and inammatory markers and decreased expres­sion of anti-apoptotic markers. Healing DFUFs showing an enrichment of a newly found population of broblasts over­expressing matrix metalloprotease 1 (MMP1), matrix metal­loprotease 3 (MMP3), matrix metalloprotease 11 (MMP11), hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF1α), chitinase-3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1), and tumor necrosis factor-inducible gene 6 (TNFAIP6) compared to nonhealing DFU [103].
Age is a signicant risk factor for diabetic foot complica­tions and development of diabetes itself [159161]. Inextricably tied to aging is cellular senescence which is the irreversible state of cell cycle arrest triggered by an array of cellular stressors [162164]. Although senescent cells are dormant, they still are metabolically active and secrete fac­tors that inuence cell behavior and may alter response to wounding. Activation of senescence in broblasts is protec­tive in the early phases of acute wound healing and contrib­utes to prevention of brosis during the later stages of wound resolution [165]. On the contrary, aberrant broblast senes­cence in DFU is associated with wound chronicity and the failure to heal [148, 166, 167]. Elegant studies revealed that aged diabetic wounds exposed to senescent macrophages directly induces broblast senescence and transformation to a pro-brotic phenotype. Specically, these macrophages produce factors called senescence-associated secretory phe­notype (SASP) that contain CXCR2 which act via the activa­tion of nuclear P21 [166]. Reversal of this SASP production led to enhanced healing in diabetic mouse model and human exvivo models [166].
Chronic exposure to hypoxia is an important factor in wound chronicity [168]. DFUs are subjected to chronic hypoxia due to the poor vasculature exhibited in diabetic patients and increased pressure points due to neuropathy. Low-oxygen tension in an acute setting is benecial for wound healing as it activates the myobroblast expression of genes necessary for physiologic healing such as TGF-β and collagen A1 (COLA1) as well as the homing of peripheral
stem cells to the wound [3, 169, 170]. Chronic oxygen depri- vation impedes the hydroxylation of proline and lysine resi­dues, which are oxygen dependent, during collagen synthesis leading to aberrant ECM synthesis and organization [171
176]. In effect broblast growth, function, and activity are
negatively affected leading to wound chronicity [153, 168,
177, 178]. Hypoxia adaptation is largely controlled through
the activation of the master gene regulator hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF1α) [179]. There is a complex interplay between hyperglycemia and HIF1α, which ultimately leads to HIF destabilization, dysfunctional broblast responses, and impaired wound healing [126, 180183]. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy, a widely used treatment modality for DFUs, works to restore oxygen levels to the wound microenvironment to activate broblasts to restore proper ECM production neces­sary for wound healing [180, 184, 185]. Interestingly there is little high-quality evidence to support HBOT use, and almost all RCTs involving HBOT have shown little to no benet [186, 187]. New attention has been directed toward topical oxygen therapy (TOT) for DFUs, with recent trials showing increased statistically signicant healing outcomes com­pared to standard of care [187194].
Hyperglycemia, the hallmark of diabetes, promotes bro­blast dysfunction and wound chronicity largely through the formation of advanced glycation end products (AGE) and imposing major epigenetic and metabolic changes [195]. The formation of AGEs (discussed in more detail in ECM) has been shown to induce apoptosis and cell cycle arrest and decreased ECM production in dermal broblasts [196201]. Interesting studies using cultured broblasts from non­ulcerated diabetic skin showed similar expression and func­tion as broblasts isolated form nondiabetic healthy subjects, implying that hyperglycemia does not directly impair bro­blast activity prior to wounding [117]. Indeed, much evi­dence has shown that broblasts isolated from DFUs show decreased wound healing responses and a stronger resistance to growth factors such as EGF, IGF, and PDGF than non­ulcerated diabetic controls [145, 149, 202]. However, more recent studies claried broblasts isolated from diabetic non-wounded skin do undergo important biological changes that renders them less responsive to important wound heal­ing factors such as TNF-α, reduced their ability to stimulate wound closure in mice, and decreased their production and assembly of ECM similarly to DFUF [42, 145, 203, 204]. Important epigenetic differences between broblasts isolated from diabetic patients is maintained even when re-exposed to physiologic glucose levels, suggesting that hyperglycemia imparts a robust metabolic epigenetic memory program in broblasts that may prime diabetic skin to chronic wounds when injured [205]. Studies using broblasts isolated from monozygotic twins discordant for type 1 diabetes have found important changes in broblast behavior to stressors that is hardwired by diabetes exposure [206, 207]. These insights
7 Physiology andPathophysiology ofWound Healing inDiabetes
https://t.me/med1917
117
are supported by newer studies showing unique broblast subpopulations shared in non-ulcerated and ulcerated dia­betic skin compared to healthy skin [103, 208]. In DFU broblasts plasticity is signicantly impaired through aber­rant NOTCH1 signaling, long-noncoding RNAs, miRNAs, and chromatin remodeling pathways [125, 209217]. Fibroblasts isolated from DFUs and implanted in a 3D model recapitulated the chronic DFU through impaired stimulation of angiogenesis, decreased reepithelialization, and compro­mised ECM assembly and deposition [145]. Taken together, epigenetic changes lock DFU broblasts in a pro­inammatory, anti-angiogenic, and anti-brotic state that opposes wound healing [208, 218, 219]. This epigenetic memory is likely a factor in the less-than-optimal healing results seen with autologous skin grafts and allogenic broblast- based therapies in the treatment of DFUs [59, 220,
221].
One potential remedy to bypass DFU broblasts memory is to reprogram these broblasts into “normal,” pro-healing, broblasts. In a series of recent studies, broblasts were col­lected from chronic DUFs and reprogrammed into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) to regain normal function. These iPSCs were then transformed back into normal bro­blasts [222224]. In an array of functional assays, these reprogrammed DFUFs displayed enhanced healing capabili­ties that was, in part, attributed to miRNA-induced epigene­tic reprogramming [224, 225].
Imbalance ofExtracellular Matrix (ECM) Components inChronic Wounds
DFUs display an irregular, thin ECM that has increased inammatory inltrates and decreased granulation tissue and broblasts [226228]. In normal wound healing, the acellu­lar ECM is an important scaffold and hub that acts as an everchanging highway and signaling reservoir for the pleth­ora of migrating cells to complete the healing process. The ECM must recruit and house inammatory cells as well as repair local damage during the inammatory phase, encour­age angiogenesis and cell migration during the proliferative phase, and contract and reorganize during remodeling [229]. MMPs and their negative regulators tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase (TIMP) are key enzymes involved in ECM dynamics [229]. Major structural components of the ECM known to be affected by these altered proteases include col­lagen, dermatopontin, and bronectin as well as important growth factors, receptors, and cell adhesion molecules nec­essary for proper wound healing and cell behavior [230
235]. MMPs are divided into seven broad subtypes according
to their substrate, including collagenases, gelatinases, stromelysins, metalloelastases, matrilysins, membrane type, and other [236]. In acute wounds, the ratio of MMPs and
TIMPs are tightly controlled in a spatiotemporal manner to direct proper ECM reorganization for healing. In DFUs, this control is ameliorated leading to chronically elevated levels of certain MMPs and reduced levels of TIMPs favoring ECM degradation [229, 234, 237]. The ratio of different MMP/ TIMP has been proposed in many studies to predict healing out comes of DFUs [238240]. Serine proteases are the other major ECM remodeler implicated in DFU chronicity and include mast cell tryptase and chymase, tissue-type plasmin­ogen activators, neutrophil elastase, cathepsin G, and uroki­nase plasminogen activators [236, 241]. Neutrophil elastase and cathepsin G, important components of neutrophil extra­cellular traps, are enriched in chronic DFU dermis and may be an important biomarker to differentiate DFUs that are prone to heal versus fail to heal [242]. Inhibiting NETosis in diabetic wound models can accelerate wound healing [242,
243]. Topical sucrose octasulfate-impregnated dressings
have shown promising results in healing DFUs by inhibiting the action of MMPs [187, 244].
The formation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) is a well-known metabolic consequence of hyperglycemia and aging and specically targets many components of the ECM [201, 245249]. This intricate process involves a non­enzymatic reaction wherein a condensation reaction occurs between the carbonyl group of a reducing sugar molecule and a free amino group of a protein, forming an intermediate Schiff base. Subsequently, this Schiff base transforms into an Amadori product, which undergoes irreversible oxidation into an AGE [250]. Collagen, vitronectin, vimentin, laminin, and bronectin are recognized targets of this glycation [251
256]. AGEs cause increased intermolecular cross-linking
between collagen bers resulting in the stiff, inelastic matrix observed in diabetic tissues including the skin, heart, and renal vasculature [245, 257259]. AGEs also target the amino acid side chains of collagen affecting their charge and interac­tion with other ECM components. Glycated collagen impairs the migration and adhesion of inammatory cells, endothelial cells, and broblasts [260262]. Growth factors and their canonical receptors are subject to this glycation with altera­tion of their activity [255, 263]. Specic receptors for AGEs, termed RAGE, are located on most skin-residing cells and facilitate complex cellular signaling cascades that impede proper wound healing [264267].
Certain growth factors and their receptors are indispens­able for ECM formation and reorganization including VEGF, IGF-1, TGF-B, PDGF, FGFs, and TNF-a. All these factors are erroneously regulated in the DFU milieu and are implicated in chronic DFU pathology [268272]. Interestingly the only three FDA-approved therapies that have shown efcacy for treating DFUs are Regranex (PDGF-BB-based biologic therapy), a major EMC growth factor, and Apligraf and Dermagraft which contain bro­blasts and ECM components [273].
118
https://t.me/med1917
Dermal broblasts from diabetic skin closely resemble those in healthy foot skin, suggesting that diabetes itself does not impact function of broblasts prior to wounding [117]. Namely, a study of the mRNA and micro-RNA (miRNA) expression proles of diabetic and healthy, nondiabetic foot skin broblasts has revealed no signicant differences in gene expression levels [117].
However, broblasts from diabetic foot ulcers exhibit major changes including altered morphology, ECM deposi­tion, increased apoptosis, diminished response to growth fac­tors, reduced proliferation, and reduced migration [42, 125,
145, 146, 274]. Patient-derived broblasts from DFUs
seeded into three-dimensional models led to decreased stim­ulation of angiogenesis, impaired ECM synthesis, and reca­pitulated the nonmigratory and hyperproliferative epidermal phenotype in organotypic cultures in the presence of kerati­nocytes [145]. In a study that used genomic approaches to analyze the pathophysiology of DFU broblasts, miR-21-5p, miR-34a-5p, and miR-145-5p, were found to be induced in DFU-derived broblasts contributing to inhibition of cell migration and proliferation, as well as induced differentia­tion and cell senescence [125].
I. Pastar et al.
Matrix Metalloproteinases andTissue Inhibitors ofMetalloproteinases
An imbalance between ECM protein synthesis and remod­eling by MMPs and the tissue inhibitors of metalloprotein­ases (TIMPs) is seen in DFUs. Increased MMP production causes ECM degradation [275]. MMPs 1, 2, 8, 9, 14, and 26 are highly expressed in DFUs [231, 276278] with con­comitant reduction in the expression of their inhibitors [104]. High MMP9 and a high MMP9/TIMP1 ratio has been shown to be a predictor of poor wound healing [278], whereas a higher MMP1/TIMP1 ratio is correlated with healing (Fig.7.3) [239]. Lobmann etal. (2002) showed an increase in MMPs with reduced concentrations of TIMP-2 in patients with DFUs, compared to traumatic wounds of nondiabetic patients, suggesting that the increased proteolytic environment reduces ECM formation and contributes to the failure of diabetic wounds to heal [279]. The rise in MMP activity not only causes matrix degradation, which delays cell migration and inhibits col­lagen deposition, but also breaks down growth factors and their target cell receptors [15, 279].
Other common causative factors for chronic wounds include deregulation of certain cytokines, growth factors, and their receptors and corresponding signaling molecules. Examples of these include TGF-β, FGF, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), interleukins, VEGF, TNF-α, PDGF, EGF, EGFR, granulocyte-macrophage colony stim­ulating factor (GM-CSF), and receptors such as TGF-β
Fig. 7.3 Deregulation of MMPs and TIMPs in DFUs. Schematic over­view of upregulated (arrows up) and downregulated (arrows down) MMPs, TIMPs, and their ratios in DFUs
receptors, EGFR, and bone morphogenetic protein recep­tor [10, 15, 122, 280].
Angiogenesis inDiabetes
During wound healing, new capillaries form and replace damaged capillaries in a process known as neovasculariza­tion. Neovascularization is important to reestablish oxygen and nutrient supply to the wound and remove waste products [64]. Angiogenesis, one form of vascularization, is the for­mation of new blood vessels from preexisting ones and is usually caused by tissue injury or neoplastic transformation [281, 282]. During the proliferative phase of wound healing, endothelial cells, stimulated by VEGF, FGF2, or low-oxygen tension/hypoxia, migrate to the wound and induce angiogen­esis and sprout capillaries to vascularize the tissue that is being formed [283, 284]. Angiogenesis arises through a nely balanced process involving pro-angiogenic and anti­angiogenic mediators, cells ECM, cytokines, and growth factors, and a shift in this balance leads to impaired angio-
7 Physiology andPathophysiology ofWound Healing inDiabetes
https://t.me/med1917
119
genesis (Table7.1) [282, 285, 286]. Vasculogenesis is the de novo formation of blood vessels from bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) [287]. These newly formed vascular structures mature into capillaries, arterioles, arteries, venules, and veins.
Impaired angiogenesis and vasculogenesis, as a result of deregulation and cleavage of growth factors, and their recep­tors lead to insufcient oxygenation and sub-optimal deliv­ery of nutrients to the wound contributing to poor diabetic wound healing (Tables 7.1 and 7.2) [68, 285, 288]. Dysfunctional angiogenesis is also a key player in many diabetes- related microvascular complications including dia­betic nephropathy, diabetic peripheral neuropathy, and dia­betic retinopathy [282, 285]. The capillary architecture in DFU is compromised including structural components, mat­uration, and capillary permeability and pericyte coverage [289]. The density of capillaries and levels of pro-angiogenic stimuli are also decreased in DFU [68, 290].
VEGF, a pro-angiogenic growth factor, is important for endothelial cell proliferation and migration, ECM degrada­tion, vessel permeability, and vasodilation [285]. Deregulated
Table 7.1 Overview of angiogenesis in acute and chronic wound healing
Normal angiogenesis Angiogenesis in DFU Pro-angiogenic cytokines (including VEGF) are released from
platelets, monocytes, and broblasts Endothelial cells (ECs) disrupt their interactions with neighboring ECs Resident ECs on the chronic wound may lose their ability to support
ECs digest the basement membrane and extracellular matrix (ECM) components (via matrix metalloproteinases) ECs, broblasts, platelets, smooth muscle cells, and monocytes release more pro-angiogenic cytokines ECs invade ECM and migrate/proliferate to form robust new vessels. These vessels are disorganized, tortuous, dense, leaky, and poorly perfused [68] Antiangiogenic and maturation factors induce remodeling of the capillary bed where excess vessels are pruned and vessel integrity is restored [68]
VEGF and associated signaling pathway contributes to diabetes- related pathologies [282, 285]. In some organ sys­tems, high levels of VEGF acts as a pathologic angiogenic stimulus (i.e., ocular neovascularization), while in others, reduced levels of VEGF activity leads to pathology (i.e., nephropathy, peripheral neuropathy, and wound healing) [282, 285, 291, 292]. Macrophages have been implicated in dysfunctional angiogenesis in DFU largely through their role in VEGF/VEGFR signaling [289, 290, 293296].
Another contributing factor to the impaired angiogenesis
seen in diabetics is the bone marrow-derived EPC (Tables
7.1 and 7.2). Dysfunctional EPC, diminished EPC numbers,
and defective recruitment, as well as transition of EPC phe­notype to a pro-inammatory one, have all been observed in diabetic patients [296298]. Increased number of CD34+ CD45dim measured at the beginning of care in DFU patients are positively associated with healing status and affected by wound area and duration, with increasing numbers showing benecial effect on wound closure [297, 298]. Furthermore, lncRNA antisense noncoding RNA in the INK4 locus (ANRIL) is found downregulated in peripheral blood sam-
Fibroblasts become senescent in chronic wounds and lose their ability to provide angiogenic functions [64, 410]
new vessel formation [285] Impaired balance between the accumulation of ECM components and their remodeling by MMPs [279, 411] The chronic wound environment impairs cellular proliferation and angiogenesis [412] EC adhesion, migration through the ECM, and proliferation are impaired in diabetic wounds [282, 285, 413]. The density and number of newly formed capillaries is signicantly attenuated in DFU [68] Antiangiogenic and maturation factors are altered in DFU, resulting in leaky and dysfunctional capillaries [68]
Table 7.2 Overview of normal vasculogenesis process and its impairment in DFUs
Normal vasculogenesis Vasculogenesis in DFU Multipotent adult progenitor cells (MAPCs) differentiate into
hematopoietic precursor cells or early endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in the bone marrow Increased vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) induces vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 (VEGF-R1) activation and subsequently increased matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) secretion Increased MMP-9 mediates the conversion of membrane-bound Kit ligand (mKitL) to soluble Kit ligand (sKitL), which mobilizes EPCs from the bone marrow to circulation
Early EPCs in the circulation further differentiate to late EPCs and gain specic endothelial cell (EC) surface markers Late EPCs arrive to the site of new vessel formation and further differentiate into mature ECs or act as a source of pro-angiogenic cytokines
Impaired VEGF-induced proliferation response in EPCs [413]
Hyperglycemia-mediated inhibition of VEGF [413, 414]
Decreased number and function of circulating EPCs impairs healing [414, 415] Decreased EPCs in the bloodstream is correlated with nonhealing DFUs and can be used to predict healing potential [297, 298] Diminished blood supply to peripheral wound [414]
EPCs demonstrate abnormal mobilization and homing mechanisms in diabetics [414416]
120
https://t.me/med1917
I. Pastar et al.
ples, DFU mouse models, and EPCs exposed to hyperglyce­mia, while increased ANRIL expression promoted wound healing in DFU mouse models by modulating the expression of HIF1α [299]. Additional lncRNA, growth arrest-specic 5 (GAS5), was shown to promote healing by activating the HIF1A/VEGF pathway by binding the TATA box-binding protein-associated factor 15 (TAF15) [300]. E2F2 transcrip­tion factor accelerated wound healing in mouse models likely through activating expression of cell division cycle­associated 7-like (CDCA7L) expression in EPCs and activat­ing angiogenesis [301]. Causes of EPC dysfunction and reduced recruitment from the bone marrow in diabetic indi­viduals include hyperglycemia, increased oxidative stress, chronic inammation, and NADPH oxidase activation [68,
297, 298, 302]. In rodent diabetic wound models, researchers
were able to modulate EPC dysfunction in response to hyper­glycemia and increase wound healing by exposing them to exosomes rich in circular RNA, mmu_circ_0000250, which stimulated SIRT1/miR-128-3p-mediated autophagy [303].
A better understanding of the mechanisms that cause dys­functional angiogenesis is of vital importance particularly in light of the upward trend in diabetes mellitus microvascular complications. Further understanding of the role of angiogenesis in these pathologies is necessary to pave the way forward for the development of novel therapies.
Inammation andInfection in Diabetic Wound Healing
Unresolved inammation is a key aspect of chronic wounds that prevent them from progressing through the normal phases of wound healing [116]. The current paradigm char­acterizes chronic wounds as being “stuck in a chronic inam­matory phase” in which excessive inammation contributes to the inhibition of wound healing and is the rationale to therapeutically target the inammatory response to limit inammation. However, this has proven to be clinically unsuccessful [304]. More recent studies have demonstrated that chronic wounds display an ineffective inammatory response characterized by impaired immune cell recruitment and function that results in a deregulated yet prolonged inammatory response, which fail to reach the optimal levels of inammation that support progression of the healing in an acute wound [101, 102]. The imbalance between pro­inammatory and anti-inammatory signals results in inhibi­tion of wound healing through increased cortisol levels [136138] that in turn induce expression of caveolins result­ing in impaired actin cytoskeletal signaling [101103, 142,
305]. These previously unrecognized ndings describe a
paradigm shift demonstrating a diminished inammatory state present in chronic wounds and provides the insights
regarding lack of clinical effectiveness of therapeutic target­ing of inammation.
A persistent inammatory state contributes to the poor wound healing phenotype seen in chronic wounds and may be caused by multiple factors. Uncontrolled inammation is known to induce MMP expression, cause tissue damage, decrease collagen synthesis, and inhibit epithelialization [121, 275, 306]. Elevated levels of advanced glycation end­products (AGEs) in serum of diabetic individuals result in a subclinical chronic inammatory state and affects synthesis of collagen [121, 306]. Hyperglycemia has been shown to elevate oxidative and inammatory stress via ROS and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), sustaining inammation [307,
308]. Neuropathy and uncontrolled diabetes can affect inl-
trating cell numbers in the skin. Studies have shown an increased number of inammatory cells present in the fore­arm skin of neuropathic individuals [272, 309], but not non­neuropathic ones [117].
During normal wound healing, macrophages shift from a pro-inammatory or “M1” phenotype to a healing­associated or “M2” phenotype [80, 81] and express pro­inammatory and anti-inammatory genes, respectively [82, 83]. Indeed, relative expressions of pro-inammatory and anti- inammatory genes have been shown to be differ­ent in healing versus nonhealing human chronic DFUs [310]. Macrophages exhibited a prolonged pro-inamma­tory response with high-expression levels of pro-inamma­tory molecules such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and MMP-9 during diabetic- impaired healing [80, 88]. Macrophage dysfunc­tion contributed to the defective healing seen in wounds of diabetic humans and mice [88]. In other studies, Nod-like receptor protein (NLRP)-3 inammasome contributed to the sustained inammatory state displayed by macrophages and is in part mediated by IL-1β in diabetic human and mouse wounds [88, 311]. Prolonged production of IL-1β has also been reported to reduce peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) expression in diabetic wounds contrib­uting to impaired healing [80]. Recent studies have demon­strated impaired recruitment of macrophages at the wound edge of DFUs [101]. In addition, single-cell transcriptomics revealed increased numbers of M1 macrophage population in healing DFUs compared to nonhealing DFUs, supporting the notion that an acute wound-like inammatory response needs to be reactivated in DFUs to allow progression of their healing [101103]. These ndings are in contrast to animal studies that demonstrated increased M1 populations inhibit healing, suggesting that increasing the M2 popula­tion would stimulate healing in diabetic wounds. However, these ndings reect the differences in human vs. mouse models of wound healing and further supports that nonheal­ing chronic wounds have a suppressed inammatory response [312, 313].